1989 “Sound of Silence” Patent Reveals Military Mind Control Secret

A patent was taken out in 1989 by one Oliver M. Lowery for something called a “silent subliminal presentation system” that seems to describe a device that would download information to the subconscious brain via an inaudible signal that would be picked up by the ear and decoded (1).

The applications for such a device, referred to as “the sound of silence,” for education are evident. One could conceivably download to one’s brain information that otherwise would have to be delivered via a classroom lecture or by reading a textbook.

However, far more ominous applications come to mind, especially if the process bypasses the usual critical filters many of us use to judge the credibility of information being imparted.

An ad agency might use such technology to convince people that Rot Gut Beer is ambrosia that will taste great, is less filling, and make you attractive to potential mates. A political campaign might be able to convince voters that their hack candidate is the second coming of Abraham Lincoln. A government could induce support for policies that people might otherwise look askance at.

CIA and Mind Control

The United States government has shown interest in mind control. The CIA used various chemical inducements, including LSD, under the MKUltra program (2), in an ostensible effort to break down resistance to interrogation.

The CIA was also interested in programming assassins, a concept popularized in the book and film “The Manchurian Candidate” (3). But has the government used electromagnetic means to try to change moods and control minds?

A site called Silence Opens Doors (4), citing an ITV report, claims that an American military psy-ops unit used something like the Lowery device to broadcast negative emotions from a facility in Riyad, Saudi Arabia, during the first Gulf War. The War is Crime site (5) noted that, at the same time, thousands of Iraqi troops surrendered en masse to coalition forces as they advanced into Kuwait and Iraq. Was there a connection?

At the time, analysts wondered why troops, battle hardened by ten years of war with Iran, would be so quick to surrender. At the time, the conclusion was that far from being battle hardened, the Iraqi Army was battle weary. Rather than face the full fury of modern combat, they took the better part of valor.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blacklistednews/hKxa/~3/iPYhkKJ6qdg/M.html

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes