AIDS Vaccine Coming Soon — Experimental Vaccine Led to Censored Deaths

September 27th, 2011

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post
September 26, 2011

Scientists are hailing a new discovery in the field of AIDS research that may lead to the development of an AIDS vaccine. The discovery, revolving around the elimination of a cholesterol membrane surrounding the virus, emerged from The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. However, the past of the AIDS vaccine is something that few scientists want to discuss. The controversial trials of experimental AIDS vaccines that led to the loss of innocent lives have been ignored by mainstream scientists and reporters. Even the scientists responsible for the deaths covered up the situation, failing to report the fatalities of their trials in order to prevent the public from finding out.

In 1991 it was reported by the Chicago Tribune that in a trial of only 19 participants based in Paris, at least 3 had died from adverse reactions to the experimental AIDS vaccine. In an attempt to cover up the deaths, the French and American authorities that sanctioned the experiments did not report the deaths in medical journals. Even after the deaths, the AIDS vaccine experiment continued, putting lives in danger purely to examine the nature of the reaction. It took the questioning of French physicians who examined 2 of the 3 dead participants to bring the truth to light, exposing the fraud to the media.

Even more shocking is the fact that the trials later continued in South Africa on unsuspecting victims looking to decrease their chance of contracting HIV. What researchers soon found was that the vaccine actually led to an increased risk of contracting HIV.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

The censorship regarding the horribly unsafe nature of the AIDS vaccine is so extreme that it took scientific whistleblowers to warn South Africans against participating in the vaccine trails, citing the fact that the vaccine actually increases the probability that the recipient develops HIV. The report was published in the Washington Post in 2007, after the trials were shut down after scientists claimed they were ineffective and needed more research. The whistleblowers state, however, that they were forced to stop due to an increase in HIV infection following the vaccine.

Interestingly enough, the AIDS vaccine in question is developed by Merck, creator of the Gardasil shot which has been linked to over 49 deaths and countless hospitalizations. The Gardasil shot, of course, may soon be forced upon young girls and boys thanks to legislators who were paid by Merck to pass a bill making the shot mandatory.

Vaccine risks are oftentimes covered up by mega corporations such as Merck in order to make a profit and avoid public scrutiny. It’s time to make vaccine manufacturers answer for their misdeeds through peaceful activism, as they have been granted legal immunity from all lawsuits — valid or not. Join the Vaccine Information Week movement and demand change within the vaccine industry.

Please visit Natural Society for the latest health news and vaccine information

Scientists: HIV Vaccine Increases HIV Risk

Print this page.

Comment Rules

30 Responses to “AIDS Vaccine Coming Soon — Experimental Vaccine Led to Censored Deaths”

Wake up and realize that you must act if your way of life is to be preserved. Everyone knows that actions speak louder than words. It is now time for action! Unlike talking, more action is needed! If you are willing to take action read on?

The modern-day equivalent of adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution is a political movement that will make government, local, state and national, more transparent, less corrupt, more accountable, less wasteful, more fair and equitable. That political movement is “The People’s Branch” at ThePeoplesBranch(dot)org. The People’s Branch is a realistic, reasonable and non-violent, way for the people to regain control of government.

There are those that are still asleep and convinced in their beliefs that modern times don’t require a more reasonable and fitting form of control over government. They believe that what may have worked for government over a hundred years ago can’t be improved upon. They are wrong!

The People’s Branch is working to give the constituents of each elected official the power to participate directly in the governing process alongside that elected official. This will grant all voting constituents of an elected officials to become part of that elected official’s ultimate check and balance. The technology now exists that can implement this. Literally The People’s Branch.

Implementing a “People’s Branch” at each level of government, local, state and national, will guarantee a government that is more transparent, less corrupt, more accountable, less wasteful, more fair and equitable. Yet, why is it that even though everyone is for better government a political movement that would ultimately improve government at all levels by neutralizing special interest’s control is yet to be implemented?

There has never been a greater need for the political solution(s) provided by The People’s Branch. But no one is saying it is going to be easy. Yet, neither was the Civil Rights movement or the Women’s Suffrage movement, etc., etc. Politicians fear this political movement because they know that if it succeeds then their power and control will come to an end and the people’s influence upon government will truly begin.

Talk is always going to be cheap. However, if you want improvement in government then you should be willing to take action and get involved in the only political solution that has a chance to truly reform the evils of government in a sustainable way! This political movement will work everywhere. Start a petition drive. You, your family and future generations will appreciate the positive changes.
Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review
By Sharyl Attkisson
March 31, 2011 11:32 AM

“For all those who’ve declared the autism-vaccine debate over – a new scientific review begs to differ. It considers a host of peer-reviewed, published theories that show possible connections between vaccines and autism.

The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled “Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes–A review.” The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them.”

htt*://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20049118-10391695.html

* = p
- is that the ‘review’ that ignores all evidence that says there is no relation? The article that presents no data, implies that association means causation. If you actually read her article, you will realize its 95% pseudoscience and 5 % science.
Much of Africa struggles from basic sanitation and hygiene requirements, but fixing real problems doesn’t make any money for big pharma.

There is no confirmatory test for HIV. EG, there is no test that isolates just the virus and you know for 100% sure that the person has HIV. That of course, is because there is NO HIV VIRUS, and any virus associated with AIDS does NOT CAUSE AIDS.
People who carry a lighter in their pocket are more likely to develop lung cancer, does that mean that lighters cause lung cancer?
- No, that is a logical fallacy by which two events that occur together are claimed to have a cause-and-effect relationship.
  - Well the vaccine autism debate has the same relationship. Vaccine-Autism has no biological plausibility. Even though people today are getting a greater number of vaccines, the immunological components are less than 10% of that which were in vaccines in the 80′s.
    - Then this is something to be studied, and not discarded out-of-hand without further research …
    - It is being studied and actually quite a bit. But the study that anti-vaccine people want is unethical. You can’t not vaccinate a large group of people to do a study. It is somewhat similar to epidemiological evidence saying that BPA was involved with diseases but lacking all biological plausibility. Only free BPA is an estrogen antagonist, and there isn’t any free BPA in someone blood. And the bound BPA is excreted and metabolized very quickly.
    - Then why are plastics manufacturers removing BPA products from the markets?
    - I forgot all of those clinical trials that you personally over saw which confirmed this statement.
      
      The thesis is perfectly testable. Compare people in the rural 3rd world to people in the 1st. Without exception, the 1st world countries will come in WAY above the rates of those in isolated areas. Problem is, a study of this magnitude would take a lot of money, and the only people willing to fund it are out-and-out and the side of vaccines.
      
      Now, go spread your lies eslewhere.
    - Large numbers of people are already being vaccinated without a study. That seems more unethical to me.
    - Removing it for advertising. There is a consensus in the public that BPA is bad for you.
    - People in 3rd world countries are a completely different population. There could be cofounders in our environment that increase the rate of autism.
    - … and some studies are re-evaluating the safety of BPA, including the FDA. Canadian officials have concluded BPA was harmful. Liability issues maybe?
      
      htt*://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/fda-shifts-stance-on-bpa
      -and-
      htt*://www.viewzone.com/plasticpoison.html
      
      * = p
    - Those websites are a joke. Can you tell me what the difference between eating BPA and having it injected into the blood?
    - I think you may be the joke. You make assertions with no evidence or reference.
    - You realize that anything you eat goes through hepatic portal circulation which metabolizes BPA into inactive byproducts. But most of the research out there is in vivo intravenous, which doesn’t accurately portray the route of exposure.
    - Evidence? It’s common knowledge.
Amazing…the eggheads come up with a “fix” for a disease that other eggheads created in ’79…..BRILLIANT!!!!!
What wonderous marvels of scientific breakthroughs we’ve advanced to so far
…..human beings…what a concept
- Allegedly created in 79. There is another layer of deception to the onion.
- we didn’t have the technology to create viruses in the 70′s.
  - This is true that we did not have the technology to create viruses in the 70′s, but we did have the technology to modify.
    
    Genetic Engineering forum
    Copyright © 2011 Advameg, Inc.
    
    “Although the structure of DNA was discovered in the 1950s, it was not until the early 1970s that scientists figured out how to clone and engineer genes. The first experiments were done with simple organisms such as bacteria, viruses and plasmids (rings of free DNA in bacteria). Hamilton 0. Smith, Daniel Nathans and Werner Arber were the first researchers to realize that the bacteria made enzymes, called restriction enzymes, that would “cut” DNA chains in specific places. The scientists could then use these enzymes to cut the DNA into segments, cut out a segment that gave disease-causing instructions, and replace it with a segment that gave correct instructions for healthy functioning.”
    
    Read more: Genetic Engineering – used, first, blood, body, function, Gene Splicing, Cloning and Engineering, Human Applications, Agricultural Applications, Controversy, Controversy htt*://www.discoveriesinmedicine.com/Enz-Ho/Genetic-Engineering.html#ixzz1Z6WkISR1
    
    * = p
    - using restriction enzymes to modify bacteria is completely different that that of modifying a virus. I modified bacterial genomes in a high school lab. You need to create the modified virus, then culture it, then purify it. Pretty much impossible in the 70′s. Before we had PCR.
    - Then why does the article say that the first experiments were done on virus?
    - Then why does the article say that the first experiments were done on virus also?
AIDS is not a virus so a vaccine is another medical scam. Read “AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire” by Dr Nancy Turner Banks. All vaccines are a scam. Read “ICD-999″ by Patrick Jordan. All Rockefellar/Rothschild medicine is a scam – pharma drugs, Chemotherapy, radiation. People are waking up. The AMA and big pharma should be eliminated.
- Umm. I have done research on the AIDS virus. I looked at it with a scanning electron microscope and sequenced its genes. I’m pretty sure it exists.
  - Sounds to me like you claim to know everything about everything, depending on the question, but produce no evidence or reference. I bet next you will claim to be a nuclear physicist or rocket scientist also. Right Dr J …
    - naw. Evidence or references? most of what i know is common knowledge. Like the first pass effect.