Barrett’s views on climate crisis worry and appalls environmentalists as her confirmation hearings continue

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett’s lack of firm views on climate change has left many environmentalists worried and appalled. 

“Quite simply, if you’re neutral on climate change, you’re complicit in the collapse of the planetary ecosystem upon which the survival of every living thing depends,” says meteorologist Eric Holthaus.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett was nominated by President Donald Trump to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court and is currently going through confirmation hearings. 

On Tuesday evening she was asked about climate change and her response was: “I’m certainly not a scientist. I have read things about climate change. I would not say I have firm views on it.”

With this comment came a lot of backlash from environmentalists, experts, and activists. According to EcoWatch, this is a deeply worrying sign. Many climate fights in the U.S. right now, focused on trying to hold the government and companies accountable, could end up in the Supreme Court.

“It’s the line ‘I’m certainly not a scientist’ that is perhaps so surreal. This has been the standard, canned answer that climate deniers have given for years. But now it’s 2020. We’re in a pandemic. You don’t need to be a scientist to be able to listen to scientists. For someone whose ENTIRE JOB depends on carefully evaluating evidence, not having any ‘firm views’ on climate change is an unrecoverable fatal flaw,” writes Holthaus.  

Since Republicans control the U.S. Senate, Barrett is all but certain to be confirmed – likely in the next three weeks before the presidential election – and would give conservatives a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court and broad authority to overturn judicial precedent on everything from health care to women’s rights to climate change. Since Barrett is only 48 years old and the court seat is a lifetime appointment, her thoughts could almost single-handedly shape the next three decades of US climate policy during a time when radical change “in all aspects of society” is required in order to preserve a stable climate system, reports The Phoenix

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes