Diana Faked Her Death

 

Diana Faked Her Death

by Miles Mathis
mileswmathis.com/diana.pdf

First published December13,2019
As usual,this is just my opinion,based on internet research anyone could do.

I have been looking for a way into this one for years, but could never find an easy path—though I didn’t
look very hard. I had read the basic Wikipedia story several times, but it has been scrubbed of most
useful information. The alternative theories are also trash. Yes, I found the usual numerology in the
mainstream story, with aces and eights everywhere, indicating a fake, but no easy hook beyond that.
But for some reason today I found the door.

That door is Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard who survived the car crash. He was in the front
passenger seatand was allegedly saved by theairbag. I sawthatnameasapeeragenameimmediately,
so I followed that clue. Plus, if you look up Trevor Rees-Jones, you find not one but two. There is
also abillionaireTexasoiland gasman with theexactsamename, including thehyphen. Heissaid to
beabout18 yearsolder, butthey could havechanged thedates. Besides, youcan stillhavechildren at
18, so theTexan could bethebodyguard’s uncle, cousin, or even father. Since oneis British and the
other American, I will assume cousins for now. They even look somewhat alike, with very square
faces.

This other Trevor Rees-Jones has recent ties to the UK, including a grandfather fromWales and a
grandmotherHolmes who was secretary forWilliam Lever, 1st Viscount Leverhulme from Cheshire.
Shewasprobably related to him, sincehiswife Hulme. Weprobably haveafudgefromHulme

to Holmes, you see. Lever was notonly a name Lever
looksfamiliar, itshould. Hewasthefounder of Sunlightsoaps, which also linksusto LeverBrothers
in the US (Lifebuoy, Lux, Vim) as well as to Unilever—now a huge multinational conglomerate.
Lever was agroundbreaker in saturation advertising at the end of the19th century. He even had Sir
Walter Besantworking for him, linking usto AnnieBesantand thewholeTheosophy nest. They were
allspooks. Lever wasabillionaireand acted likeone, setting up monopoliesand then suing thosewho

Townshend, granddaughter of the Marquess Townshend, linking
of WilliamCavendish, 5th Duke of
tried to break them. He won a huge suit against the newspapers after they blew the whistle on his
monopoly—though the case may have been manufactured.

The Texan Rees-Jones is also involved in thePerot Museum in Dallas, which is sold as philanthropy
fromH. RossPerot, Rees-Jones, and others, butwhich includesawalloping doseof pro-oilpropaganda
and science propaganda, including Big Bang. The Rees-Jones wing has also promoted Sherlock
Holmes, which wecan nowread asared flag—sinceRees-Joneswas aHolmes/Hulme. Thatcan’tbea
coincidence. So it appears Rees-Jones learned well from his rich ancestors the value of saturation
advertising.

Anyway, I gotto theAHAmomentpretty quickly after that, sinceIwentto thepeerage.comto look up
these Rees-Jones. They are listed, but are extremely well scrubbed. Only two are listed, and they come
outof nowhereand go nowhere. Nothing isknown of them, although they arerecent. Wealready see
signsof heavy pawing, and we knowwhy. Theonly information we can tease outis thatthese Rees-
Joneswererelated to theSandilandsin oneline, and through themto theStirlings, Douglases, Murrays
and Grahams. So thislinetakesusto Scotland, notWales. Thosenameslink usto the fakeDunblane
event,asyou willremember. Butwedo quickly hittheLivingstons, Stewarts, and Hamiltonsaswell,
thelastnamelinking usto PrincessDiana. Seebelow, whereIshowyou Dianawasclosely related to
the Hamilton dukes.

So thenaturalthing to do islook atthenameReesinstead of Rees-Jones. Thebodyguard Trevor Rees-
Jones’ bio at Wikipedia tells us his father was a Rees, not a Rees-Jones, and refuses to tell us how Rees-
Jones picked up the second name. [But we do find Rees-Jones was born on March 3. That is 3/3.] The
Rees baronets are scrubbed as well, with the1st baronetbeing given no parents. Thatis unusual. 1st
baronets are normally listed with parents. However, we are given the 1st baronet’s wife, and she is
enough to give up thefarm here. She was Mary Catherine Dormer, daughter ofLieutenant General
Honorable JamesCharlemagneDormer. Hisfather was abaron. He became Commander-in-Chief of
theMadrasarmy in 1891. Hisson CharlesDormer, 14th Baron, married CarolineClifford, daughter of
Sir Robert Cavendish Spencer Clifford, 3rd baronet.

Areyou finished hopping up and down? Yes, DianawasaSpencer, so thisindicatesDianaand Trevor
Rees-Jonesarecousins—something they never tell you. Some willsay, “Oh, but maybeSpencer is just
afirstname, notconnected to theSpencer-Churchills”. No. Sir Clifford’sfather AdmiralSir Augustus
Clifford, 1st Baronet, married a

usto
theCompton Earls, theShirleys, theFerrers, and theNoels (Byrons, Gordons). TheComptons then
link usto theSpencers of Suffolk. Clifford himself was the son
Devonshire, and Georgiana Spencer, daughter of the1st EarlSpencer. In fact, this EarlSpencer had a
daughter named. ..DianaSpencer. So wehittheSpencers twice through theDormers. And wehitthe
Churchills as well, since EarlSpencer’s grandmother was Lady Churchill, daughter of the1st Dukeof
Marlborough. These are not some off-line Spencers.

So it looks like the bodyguard in the crash wasn’t really a bodyguard. He was a cousin of Diana
Spencer fromthepeerage. BestguessatthispointishewasIntelligence, maybeMI5 or6,and thathe
crashed this car himself with acouple of bodies fromthe morguein theback seat. They then hired a
Parisian coroner to identify the bodiesas Diana and Dodi. Nothing simpler. We have seen itdozensof
times. MI5 and CIA specialize in stuff like this. But back to that later.

Here’sanother clue. Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones’parents are given atWikipedia as Colin Rees and
Gill. Gillwhat? We don’tknow. Isthat Gill afirstnameor amaiden name? Wearen’ttold. JustGill.

Well, as it turns out, Diana’s grandmother was named Ruth Gill, daughter of Colonel William Gill.

Long pause for effect. Savor it.

TheGillslink usthrough theCrombiesto theForbesof Boyndlieand Monymusk, thereby linking usto
the Keiths, Kers, Carnegies, Arbuthnotts, and Morisons. The Morisons link us to the Maitlands,
Stewarts, Duffs andGordons. Ruth Gill married aRoche, Baron Fermoy, and theRoches were really
FitzEdmunds. They link usthrough theO’Gradysto the Pagets, Earlsof Uxbridge, which isinteresting
sinceaPagetwasin controlof theDianainvestigation in England. SeeOperation Paget. Wearenever
told whereitgotitsname, which is curious enough, butI assumeitisbecauseaPagetwascontrolling
its outcome. The Pagets are also the MarquessesofAnglesey, among other things. Also curious isthat
if you go to theHastingsLawLibrary online for acopy of thePagetreport, uponclicking thelink you
are taken to an empty page at Gov.uk.

ThePagetsthen link usto theHoares, which isalso acluesinceitagain tiesusto the Dianastory. One
of Diana’s boyfriends is alleged to have been Oliver Hoare. So he was yet another cousin.

On her father’s side, we find Diana’s grandmother was a Hamilton, daughter of the 3rd Duke of
Abercorn. So if you thought Diana was of vastly lower rank than Prince Charles, you were wrong. She
isfromseverallinesof dukes. Dianaisalso aBaring, of theBaring bankers, sincethe6th EarlSpencer
had married aBaring in 1887. This also links usto theSeymours, Fitzroys, Somersets and Walpoles.
TheFitzroysarealso dukes(Grafton), so thatisathird dukedomin Diana’srecentlines. TheSomersets
are Dukes of Beaufort, making four. The Hamiltons link us to the Gordon-Lennox, Dukes of
Richmond, making five. They also link recently to theRussells, Dukes of Bedford, making six. The
Russellsquickly link usto theLeveson-Gowersand Manners, giving ustwo more, making eight. The
Cavendishes make nine.

But let us return to Rees-Jones. His injuries also don’t match the story. We are told his face was
crushed, requiring totalreconstruction using old photosasreference. 150 piecesof titaniumwereused
to hold the bones together. Nonetheless, his face never looked that bad, and was “nearly back to
normal with ayear”. Really? Does this look like someone who has had his face completely rebuilt
from photos?

Not to me. Here is what he looked like in his 20s:

Amazing that his face was crushed but his nose suffered no damage at all. His mouth suffered no
damage at all. His jaw was supposed to have required major reconstruction, but we see no sign of
damage. Theonly damageis slight, to his left eye. That could have been acquired beforethe crash,
during his time in the army.

Also curious that we have pictures of the passengers just before the crash:

Butthat’sjust acontinuation of thejoke. Thedriver is making faces, and neither Diana nor Dodi can
beidentified in any of them. Do youreally think thatwastaken by paparazzidriving in frontof them?
I say it is staged. Why? One, because I have never seen a windshield that clean. It is being shot
through by abrightflash, but we see notonespeck of dust, notonebug splat, notonestreak. Also,
look atthehood. Thecarissupposed to beablack Mercedes. Itlooksbrownish to me. Hereisone
from the same staged photo set:

I found that atNational Enquirer, sold as pictures just before the crash. Henri Paul, the driver, is
wearing the same clothes and the same glasses, and that is supposed to be Diana in the back. But
again, does that car look black to you? And look closely atDiana. Whatis blocking theview of her
face? It isn’t the rearview mirror or the seat. It looks like she is wearing a half-helmet. Why?

Also notethatRees-Jonesmakessureto turn his head away to hisleftin every singlephoto in theset.
Why? Because that hides the fact that he already has a scar over there.

TheReesin thepeeragearefromWales, aswehaveestablished. Therethey arerelated to theOwens,
Morgans, and alltheother top nobles. So weshould also look atBaron Peter InnesRees, d. 2008, who
married aMaxwell. HewasChief Secretary of theTreasury in the1980sand wasaPrivy Counsellor.
Thepeeragelistsnochildren forhim, butI would guessheisanother relativeofourRees-Jones. Also
don’t forget Martin Rees, Baron of Ludlow, who we have seen on my science site. He is a British
astrophysicist and the constant salesman of mainstream physics, involvedin thepromotion of gravity
waves. I havealsoshown you beforethatalthough hewasPresidentof theRoyalSociety and isstilla
knightand board member of theIASin Princeton, nothing isknown of him. No parentslisted atWiki,
Geni or any other site. But as I say there:

if we study the Rees family in the peerage, we fnd they were formerly Baronets, related to theViscounts Montagu, the Barons Dormer, the Tufton Earls, the Cecil Earls, the Neville Earls, the
Fitzgerald Earls, the Grey Marquesses, the Beauchamp Earls, the Percy Dukes, the Berkeley
Barons, the De Vere Earls, and the Somerset Earls. Through the Nevilles, they were related to
Henry VIII. Catherine Parr, last wife of Henry, had formerly been the wife of Neville. Through
the Montagus the Rees are related to the Stanleys, Earls of Derby.

Also see Sir William Rees-Mogg, Baron of Hinton Blewitt, editor of the The Times, member of the
BBC’s board of governors, chairman of the Arts Council, and director of General Electric Company
from 1981-97. You can see how he might be helpful in controlling the Diana story.

Also see his son Jacob Rees-Mogg, who was appointed Leader of the House of Commons and Lord

President of the Council by Boris Johnson, despite—or because of—his being aRothschild bank and
Lloyd George brat. He is basically a mole from the hedge funds, especially his own company Somerset
Capital. Itisalmostimpossibleto believehehasnotbeen charged with conflictof interest, exceptthat
this is business as usualin theUS and UK. There are no oversightbodies left, so who would charge
him? Despite being completely unappealing and hugely unpopular, somehowhekeeps advancing—
also business as usual in the Modern world. The creepier you are the more upwardly mobile.

Also remember SophieRhys-Jones, who married Prince Charles’younger brother Edward. That’sthe
samename, differentspelling. ShelookslikeDiananotbecausethey arethesameperson, butbecause
they areclosecousins. Sophie’sO’Sullivan line in thepeerageis quickly scrubbed, ahugered flag by
itself, buttheRhys-Jonesarealso Taits(Tates), Molesworths, Bournes, and Wallaces. Sophie’sRhys-
Jones line also only goes back acouple of generations, which is strange. They come outof nowhere
with thebirth of aTheophilus Rhys-Jones in 1871. So, like theRees-Jones, they are asort of ghost
nobility, with all ties to thepast broken by people likeDarrylLundy. The modern Rhysfamily also
comesout of nowhereatthesametime, with a Walter FitzUryan Rhys, Baron Dynevor, b. 1873. There
arefar older Rhysesin thepeerage, butyou haveto go back many centuries, and they don’tlink to the
modern ones. As it turns out, Rhyschanged the spelling fromRice, as you might expect. They
descend fromthe Barons Talbot as well as theHowards, Dukes ofNorfolk. Also related to the
Vaughans. Morerecently they descend fromtheChild-Villiers, Earlsof Jersey, and theLeighs, Barons
Stoneleigh. That links us to theStanleys, since the Stanleys were originally. . . Stoneleighs.

TheVilliersthen link usto thePeels(seethecover ofSgt. Pepper’s), theGrosvenors, theEgertons, the
Carters, and Lady Elizabeth Churchill. Yes, thatistheElizabeth Churchill, daughter of the1st Dukeof
Marlborough, who married Scroop Egerton, 1st Duke of Bridgwater, linking those two powerful
families in 1703. Their daughter married Wriothesley Russell, 3rd Dukeof Bedford and Marquess of
Tavistock, linking all three dukedoms. Although that trifecta wasn’t able to maintain itself through
further marriage, Elizabeth Churchillisnotonly an explicitlink between theReesfamily and theRice
family, shelinksboth to theSpencers, proving my pointhere. Thatbeing notonly thatthetop of the
peerage is not only incredibly incestuous, but that for all intents and purposes,
Rhys=Rice=Rees=Reese. In previous papers, we have seen that we can also include Reich, Rich,
Ritchie, Richie, and so on. Theupper end of thepeerageisreally justonebig family under athousand
fudged and manufactured names. The only thing they like more than manufacturing names is
manufacturing events.

We are told Diana couldn’thave faked her death because there was an immediate autopsy done when
her body wasreturned to London. Butthat autopsy was done by Dr. Robert Chapman. Does thatname
ring a bell? It should, since we have seen it many times in these fake events. Think Mark David
Chapman,fake shooter of John Lennon, admitted to be related to the peerage as well as to every
famous person ever known. Think Lawrence of Arabia, real surname Chapman, of the Chapman
baronets. Think theChapman brothers, fakeModern artists whose career has been madedestroying
real art. Dr. Chapman is like the Thomas Noguchi of London, since he has been involved in many
other fakes, including the 7/7 fake bombings and the Bain murders. Actually, two Chapmans were
involved in theBain fake, sinceTVpresenter WallaceChapman also gavetestimony againstBain. No
one found that suspicious, I guess.

If you remember, Bain was convicted of killing his family in Dunedin 1995, then acquitted and
released in 2007. Although thegovernmentstillbelieved hewasguilty, itpaid himamillion dollarsto
drop all claims. You might ask why Dr. Chapman was involved in this retrialin New Zealand. They
didn’t have any coroners in New Zealand? You might also ask why thePrivy Council was allegedly

involved in the retrial. We are told rugby player Joe Karam appealed the case to the British Privy
Council, which quashed Bain’s New Zealand convictions and ordered a retrial. What? How does a
rugby player get standing to appeal a multiple murder case in New Zealand to the Privy Council in
London? That would be somewhat like appealing a major murder case to the Attorney General’s Office
in theUS. Shouldn’tBain’sattorneyshaveappealed to aNewZealand appellatecourt, instead of to the
Privy Council in London? It is completely illogical that the Privy Council should have that kind of
power, sinceitreeksof asortof Star Chamber, making amockery of theso-called justicesystem. All
it indicates to me is that Intelligence was involved here, and that the whole thing was a sham.

At any rate, Dr. Chapman ruled Diana was not pregnant, while Dodi’s father Mohammed Fayed was
claiming she was. Since even according to the mainstream timeline, Dodi and Diana had been dating
only aboutonemonth, thisclaim of pregnancy hasto beseen aspretty absurd. Howmany fathers of
theboyfriend would knowaboutapregnancy atthreeweeksanyway? Which justtendsto confirmthat
Mohammed was and is blowing smoke, to make the deaths look real.

Is Dr. Chapman listed in thepeerage? Thereare many RobertChapmans there, butthelistings are so
incompleteitimpossible to tellwho iswho—probably onpurpose. My guess is heis. I found nobio
for him and he is not listed at Wikipedia, but his link above to New Zealand may indicate a link to
RobertMcDonald Chapman, CMG, University of Auckland. Another thing indicating theseChapmans
are from the peerageisthattheChapmanstherearerelated to. ..theReesesand Spencers. SeeRobert
Spencer Chapman, whose daughter married the Baronet Musgrave in 1918. If you think Spencer is a
first name, seeEllen Spencer Chapman of the same years. The Chapmans are also related to the
Montagus, Tudors, Townshends, Stuarts, Fitzroys, Clements, Barclays and Hamiltons. The1st Baronet
Chapman’s mother was a Webb. The current Queen is a Webb.

And we have another connection to our Rees-Jones in Texas. Angharad Rees of thepeerage married
Baron McAlpine of Moffett, adirector of Sir Robert McAlpine and Sons Ltd. Thatis one of thelargest
engineering and construction companies in the UK, specializing inoil and gas projects, as well as
defenseand mining. They builttheMillenniumDomeand Bridge, theOlympicStadium, OneCanada
Square, the Imperial War Museum North, and dozens of other famous buildings.

Angharad was a well-known actress in the 1970s, and was formerly married to actor Christopher de
Lerisson Cazenove. If you think thatlastnameisaslur of Casanova, you arecorrect. Heisalso listed
in the peerage, related to the Astleys, Graftons, Beresfords, Kennedys, Howes, Milles, le Stranges,
Wodehouses, Sheppards, Lamottes, etc.

Trevor Rees-Jones of Texashas ason named Trevor Rees-Jones III. Weare told he was in college at
TCUin 2011, so heisquiteyoung for theson of a68-year-old man. So here’saquestion for you:who
isTrevor Rees-Jones, Jr., orII? Wikipediatellsusthegasman in TexasisTrevor D. Rees-Jones, with
noJr. affixed. Hisfather isgiven asTrevorWilliamRees-Jones, confirming heisnotajunior. If he
were a junior he would have the same middle name. So why is his son III?

Whileyou’rechewing onthat, let’slook atDodiFayed. Whatwashisrolehere? Well, itlookslikehe
also wished to fakehis death. Why? Well, as it turns outhewas (allegedly)in the middle of abig
lawsuit. Hisfiancéewassuing himformillionsfor breach of contract, sincehepromised to marry her
and then allegedly ran off with Dianajustbeforethewedding day. You may notremember thedetails,
butDodi and Diana had only been dating aboutonemonth. According to the mainstream story, they
gottogether in July and by the end of August they were both dead. Just onemonth earlier, in June,
Dodi allegedly got engaged to KellyFisher. The wedding was scheduled forAugust 9. I hopeyou

recognize that date. It is the day of the Manson Murders and the Resignation of Nixon. So, another big
red flag.

What that means to me is that this story is also cover. I think Kelly Fisher’s feud with Dodi’s father was
staged. For whatpurpose? To maketheromanceof Dodiand Dianalook realwhen itwasn’t. I think
it was also staged. Dodi was notan attractive man, being short, hairy, and ghoulish. And we know
Diana liked dashing and attractive men like Oliver Hoare, Will Carling, or David Waterhouse. So I
believe Dodi wasn’t involved here as alover, he was involved as director and producer. Remember,
likeRoman Polanski, Dodiwasafilmproducer. And notjustany films. Dodiwasexecutiveproducer
for theF/X movies and TV series. F/X stands for. . . special effects. Faking things. Do you know what
the subtitle of the filmF/X was? Murder by Illusion. Are you still there? Yes, itis about staging a
murder, to get amob informantoutof thebullseye. Therunning time of theflim is. . . 108 minutes.
Aces and eights. Whatdo you know. Think that’sacoincidence? Therunning time of F/X2 is also
108 minutes.

Fayed also producedChariots of Fire,another famouspropagandafilm. Itre-promotesold agentEric
Liddell, whomIpreviously outed in my paper on Daisy Ridley. Although theflimsellshimassome
sort of hero, the race was always fishy and was likely fixed. He beat his previous best time by a
suspiciously largemargin. Runner Harold Abrahamsisalso re-packaged and resold, buthisfather was
a Jewish banker and Harold came out of theArmy. Being at Cambridge, he wasnot some dispossessed
Jew, butoneof thehighly privileged and promoted. Proof:heis stillbeing promoted by descendant
spooksfromhis family decadeslater. I would guesshisrace wasfixed as well: why else includeitin
theflim? Allthesepeopledo isrun newfakesand re-sellold ones. Washiscoach SamMussabinithe
Michele Ferrari (see Lance Armstrong’s “doctor”) of his time? My guess is yes. They admit the
amateur Abrahams was criticized for hiring a professional coach—something not done at the time.
And get this: Mussabini was also involved in coaching cycling. He began as a coach for Dunlop
Tyres. Thatmeanshewashired to promoteabrand, and companiesarenotknown for their scruples. I
havenoproof theseraces were fixed;I only havetheflim Chariots of Fire to stokemy suspicions. In
my experience, thesepeopledon’tmakeflimsaboutanything real. So theflimby itself isindication of
the fake.

More indication is theinclusion ofEvelyn Aubrey Montague inChariots of Fire. You willremember
thatGeorgeWashington wasaMontague, and thatthey wereand arehigh up in thepeerage, being the
Dukes of Buccleuch, among other things. Although he went by the name Evelyn, in the flim they
called him Aubrey, for obvious reasons. His grandfather was C. P. Scott, legendary editor of the
ManchesterGuardian (nowjustTheGuardian). So, likeAndy Murray, Montaguehad an insidetrack
to publicity. I guesswecan giveEvelyn creditfor notpurchasing agold medalin thesteeplechase. I
mention himbecause they admithewas afriend of Abrahams. With friendslikeMontague and Cecil
(below), Abrahams was in no fear of bullying at Cambridge, due to being Jewish or for any other
reason.

Yes, “AndrewLindsay”of theflimwasalso fromthepeerage, aswecan tellby the“Lord”beforehis
name. Butthey actually changed hisname. Lindsay isalso high up in thepeerage, buttherealperson
thecharacter wasbased on was aCecil, not a Lindsay. HewasDavid BrownlowCecil, 6th Marquess of
Exeter. He was later Presidentof theIAAF and theBritish OlympicAssociation, so youmay wonder
why he asked to be left out ofChariots of Fire. We are told it is because Abrahams never beat him
around thequad, asshown in theflim. So why onearth would theproducersand directorsfudgethat?
Itdoesn’tgiveyou much confidencein their loveof thetruth, doesit? I would suggestCecilwanted to
be left out of it for a greater reason, which I just gave you.

Anyway, back to Fayed. If Dodididn’tfakehisdeath to avoid thatfakelawsuit, why did hefakeit? I
can only guess, but I would say he did it for the usual reason: to join MI6 and go undercover.
Remember, likeTrevor Rees-Jones, Dodi also came outof theRoyalMilitary Academy atSandhurst.
That’sright, pause on that onefor effect, too. Dodi and Trevor both came out of Sandhurst. Coming
outof Sandhurst, Dodiwasassigned asan attachéto theUnited Arab EmiratesEmbassy in London—a
normal spook assignment. He was notfromtheUAE, hewas Egyptian, so the assignment otherwise
makes no sense. Why would this billionaire’sson become an embassy attaché? I say it is probably
because hewas MI6 from the very beginning, and this is howyoung agents gettheir feet wet. After
thathegraduated to Hollywood, also asubsetof Intelligence. Butby thetimehewas42, hewasready
for ameatier assignment. Hewastired of flimsand wished to moveon. HisMiddleEastern looksand
nondescript appearancemay have madehimusefulin more seriousprojects. In other words, hedidn’t
justwantto fakeprojectsfor Hollywood, hewanted to fakeprojectsforreal. And hedidn’twantto do
itfromthesidelines, asan executivedirector, hewanted to do it forreal. So theDianaprojectwashis
first“real”project. Or, itwassold asreal, rather than fiction. Itwasn’tsold asapretend story through
Hollywood, it was sold as a real story through the mainstream media. Its success was Dodi’s
springboard into the world of covert ops.

You may notknowthatDodi’sbrother Omar isalso aspook, though hekeepshishead abitlower. He
produced the 2015 documentaryThe Sunshine Makers, which is a rather late promotion of LSD, but
which takes itsplacein theproud lineof Intelligencedrug-pushing going back decades. Itreminds us
that the original LSD pusher of the 1960s wasAugustus Owsley Stanley III, supposedly froma
political family in Kentucky, but obviously another peerage brat pushing Operation Chaos. The
Stanleyspop up in these projects almost as often as theCohens. Owsley has been scrubbed fromthe
peerage, but even Steely Dan admitted he was of these lines, naming their song about himKid
Charlemagne. And what was the name of their album including that song? The Royal Scam.
Anyway, he wasscum of thelowestkind. So is Omar Fayed, who pretendsto bean environmentalist
while pushing for space exploration and colonization. He is a fellow of the Institute of Ecotechnics
here in New Mexico, started by fellow spook JohnPolk Allen of the same crypto-Jewish families.
Allen was amole fromtheAllegheny Ludlum SteelCorporation, having worked there as well as with
David EliLilienthal(Tennessee Valley Authority and Atomic Energy Commission) in the1950s. So
you should be a bit surprised to find him hanging out with Burroughs, Kerouac, and the other phony
Beats in the 1960s, calling himself Johnny Dolphin. Like others around him in this movement, he
pretended to writeplays, poetry, and whatnot, buteverything hedid wascrap—on purpose. Again, it
was part of Operation Chaos, and was intended to promote Modernism while at the same time
destroying real art of allkinds. This notonly replaced real art with anew art that could be used for
money laundering, it also displaced all real artists with fake ones fromtheFamilies. In other words,
the truly talented were kicked out of their own fields and replaced by the talentless children of the
superrich. Thesekidscould then bepromoted asgeniuses, giving themtheattention they desired while
completely fracturing all forms of true expression. Without these forms of expression, it was hoped
any chance for revolution or resistance would be destroyed—as has pretty much been the case.

To disrupt the real hippies, Allen started Synergia Ranch in 1969—same year as the fake Manson
Murders—and the Institute of Ecotechnics in 1973. This was the attempt to hijack and divert the
environmentaland artmovementsof the1960s, pulling in earnestprogressivesand then subtly turning
them to ineffectual paths. It was yet another disempowerment project posing as an empowerment
project.

Allen was also behind the ridiculous Biosphere project, a 250 million dollar project to save the Earth by

building a big plastic dome on her and creating a closed system. The main point of the project was
creation of fear:the reason we needed to do this, we were told, is thatthe natural system of theEarth
was coming to an end, either due to inevitable nuclear war, overpopulation, or system degradation.
Same project of fearthe fake Hawkingwas still selling last year before his fake death. This fear
allowed for greater levels of taxation across theboard, including taxation for fakeNASA and SpaceX
projects to colonize and explore space.

So anyway, that is who Omar Fayed has joined. He is pushing ahead that execrable set of projects.
Butlet’sget back to Diana’sdeath. Thefact it was fiction would also explain thepoor acting of the
royalfamily after thedeath. Will and Harry never seemed that distraught, did they? And of course
Charles alwayslooked likehe could care less. As for theQueen, she could hardly disguise her glee.
Thisis becausethewholething had been manufactured to getrid of Dianaonceand for all. They had
already gone through a nasty and embarrassing divorce a year earlier, and that hadn’t accomplished
much atall, exceptmakethingsworse. Worsebecauseeveryonetook Diana’sside. So by“getrid of
her”, I mean getthepublic’seyesoff her, notkillher. TheQueen, who had oncebeen abeauty herself,
couldn’t stand being upstaged by this younger and prettier woman, especially once it became clear
Diana couldn’t stand Charles and would continue to make amockery of the marriage. Afaked death
would solve many of those problems, since adead woman can’t continue to makepublic appearances
and beinterviewed. She can’tbefeted for supporting good causes, and can’t makethepapers for her
dalliances either.

Moreproof in thisdirection isthestrangemethod of her “burial”. Shewasallegedly buried by herself
onan island in themiddleofalake. Yeah, I didn’tknowthatuntiltoday, either. Very weird. On the
huge Spencer estate at Althorp, where her father the Earl Spencer lived until 1992, and which her
brother the current Earl still owns, they built a memorial:

Yes, we are supposed to believe sheis buried there by herself, notin thefamily plot with the others.
No other Spencer is buried in the middle of that lake, or ever was.

We are always told that a faked death couldn’t work, since the family wouldn’t agree to be split like
that. Willand Harry wouldn’tkeep quietaboutitand would demand to seetheir mother. Butwhatno
oneseemsto understand ishoweasy thatwould beto dealwith. Justasthedeath wascakefor MI6 to
fake, having thekids see their mother whenever they liked would also becake. These people live in
huge castles surrounded by extensive grounds and high fences, remember? So no one knows what goes
on in Windsor Castle or Buckingham Palace or any of those places unless the royals want them to
know. It is not like Diana would have a problem getting in or out. They drive her in in a car with
tinted windows, or better, chopper her in. Who willbethe wiser? I willbe told that servants would

squeal to the papers. Yeah, maybe, but since the papers won’t print it, it doesn’t matter. Society is
tightly controlled, and that section of society the most of all. I will told that servants would talk locally,
and theword would getoutthatway. Yes, and I assumeitdoes, to avery limited extent. Butitstops
therebecauseitisnever confirmed by themainstream. Therumorsarenever allowed to spread. Large
amounts of money are spent squelching them. One assignmentof the spooksis to deal with talkative
servants. There are ways to deal with that.

Plus, they don’t really care if afew people knowthis was faked. ITDOESN’TMATTER. Itdoesn’t
requirethateveryonebelieveit. Itonly requiresthattheofficialstory remain intact, becauseaslong as
it does Diana cannot resurface and start making appearances in the paper again. The Queen doesn’t
care if Diana visits her children. TheQueen doesn’t care if Diana lives aquietlife somewhere, outof
the limelight. All she cares about is that Diana not be famous anymore. She demands that Diana’s
media attention remain at zero, and a faked death accomplishes that, you see.

You willsay thatallDianahasto do isgo to themediaherself. Butthatwouldn’twork because, again,
themediaiscontrolled. No onewould printthestory. Ifshegoeson Facebook orTwitter orYoutube,
theauthoritiesjustdeny itisher, claiming itisan imposter. Butmy assumption isthatDianaagreed to
this anyway. She was probably just as tired of the media circus as the Queen, and welcomed a way out.
My guessis sheis married to somesecond son of someEarl or Baron somewhere in the country, with a
changed name and asecond family. Possibly sheis nowabrunette. That is about allit would take.
Mostpeoplearen’tthatgood atfacialrecognition;and besides, localstend to beprotectivein caseslike
this. The ones who knowtend to beproud to bein on the secret, and would shield Diana rather than
expose her. And if any local starts making realtrouble, MI5 is again there to putalid on it. Again,
they don’t care if you know. All they care is that you don’t make trouble.

Which is why they won’t blink twice at this paper. What a few unconnected people know is
meaningless to them. If I told you exactly where she was and suggested that you and thousands of
others storm the place to free her from her bonds of anonymity, CIA would probably end up on my
doorstep, butthatisn’twhatI amdoing. I didn’tneed to read aboutDianawhen shewasaliveand don’t
need to be updated on what she is doing now. I don’t really care. I just wish they would fake the
deathsofall theroyalsand nobles, so thatwedidn’thaveto hear aboutany of themand alltheir stupid
philanthropies, charities, projects, concerns, and other self-promotions—including their rotten art, their
rotten science, and their rotten literature.

I only write these papers because I want to know the truth. Sorting through the lies helps me to
understand better the world I am living in, and it may help you too.

Addendum Dec. 14, 2019:After doing abitmorereading—cued by readers—I discovered wecan pull
the Cohens in here as well. I said above that the Stanleys and Cohens seem to appear in just about
every major hoax we look at. Well, Diana had been in atwo-year relationship with HasnatKhan up
until the month before the hoax. According to the peculiar mainstream timeline, Diana allegedly
moved fromKhan to Fayedin the same month. More indication of afake. You don’tget over “Mr.
Wonderful” that fast. Which indicates Diana was probably still with Khan after the faked death, having
never split from him. So that is probably where we can place her in late 1997. Khan was living in
London at the time (working at London Chest Hospital), so it would appear that Diana never left
London—or didn’t go far. I am notsaying sheis still with him, since heremarried in 2006. Butmy
guess is thatis where she was in late 1997. When they split and where sheis nowis anyone’sguess.

Butthatisnotwhy I amhere. I amhereto remind you thatI havepreviously suggested Khan isaslur
ofKahn, which is avariantof Kohn/Kohen. This also probably links usto Komnene. So theKhans
arejusttheEastern castof theCohen family. They admitthis linksusto Imran Khan, PrimeMinister
ofPakistan, who is acousin of Hasnat. Iremind you thatit also probably linksusto theKurtCobain
hoax,wherewe saw aKhan onthe suicidenote. That would beCapt. Larry Khan, probably referring
to Interscopeexecutive Larry Khan. ThatLarry Khan lookssomething likeHasnatKhan, and may be
from this Pakistanifamily. No biographicalinformation on this Larry Khan was to befound, then or
now.

Oh, and remembertheLondon bridgefakestabbingfromtwo weeksago, which included Usman Khan
as fake stabber and Sadiq Khan as fake mayor. We can file them under the name Cohen too, I guess.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes