Glen Allen’s Lawsuit Against the SPLC: We Will Appeal Adverse Ruling

INTRODUCTION by William Williams, Chairman, National Alliance: We should
have expected as much from this judge — a Clinton appointee. The top
dogs at SPLC (what’s left of it) were “Friends of Bill.” And, of course,
a half billion dollar endowment can buy them a lot of “justice.”

It’s good that Glen will appeal. He has a sound case, but the judicial system is corrupt in favor of those who oppose us.

The SPLC pleads “free speech.” That’s a good one. Free speech for Jews, but not for their critics.

A
Jewess on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” show was trying to explain
causes for the rise in “anti-Semitism” on college campuses, and my wife
piped up with, “The rise in anti-Semitism is caused by Semitism.”

It’s good to remember what William Pierce said about judges: “Remember, a judge is a cross between a lawyer and a politician.”

* * *

MR.
ALLEN sent the following communication to his supporters: [Last month]
Judge Katherine Blake of the US District Court for the District of
Maryland dismissed all my claims against the SPLC, Heidi Beirich, and
Marc Potok.

Although Judge Blake’s opinion is 17 pages long, only
a few pages provide substantive legal analysis. The essence of that
analysis is this: 1)all my state law claims are disguised defamation
claims and are therefore subject to defamation claim defenses such as
the opinion doctrine, i.e., the SPLC, Beirich, and Potok merely made
statements about me that cannot be verified as true or false or merely
expressed their opinion and are protected; and 2)I failed plausibly to
allege that the SPLC defendants committed illegal or unethical acts.

I
find both propositions flagrantly flawed. I alleged numerous claims
that cannot properly be characterized as defamation claims, including,
for example, a negligent supervision claim that the court hardly
addressed at all. And to say I did not plausibly allege illegal and
unethical conduct by the SPLC in accordance with federal “plausibility”
pleading standards for a motion to dismiss distorts that standard beyond
recognition. The court states, for example, that I did not plausibly
allege that the SPLC defendants bribed or otherwise improperly induced a
National Alliance employee to turn over confidential documents. But my
complaint describes in detail who was bribed or induced and when, the
circumstances surrounding those events, and why they were illegal and/or
unethical. The court essentially is requiring me to plead full and
detailed evidentiary facts, but I cannot do that without discovery,
i.e., document requests and depositions. This is not the proper
pleading standard.

We live in an upside down world, so I had
steeled myself for an unfavorable result. I am nonetheless disappointed
in the manifest infirmity of Judge Blake’s opinion. I do not feel my
claims got a fair shake.

I will appeal to the Fourth Circuit. My co-counsel, Fred Kelly, is just as defiant as I am. I will of course keep you apprised as the appeal progresses. For your continued support I am continually grateful. Here again is my website for donation purposes: https://breathing-space-for-dissent.com

Thank you for staying with me on this endeavor. Our choices, it seems to me, are either to lie supinely on our backs or to stand on our feet and fight. You have taken the second option with me and I’m grateful for that.

* * *

Source: William Williams and Glen Allen

Source Article from https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/12/glen-allens-lawsuit-against-the-splc-we-will-appeal-adverse-ruling/

Related Posts
High Court lets Knesset legal adviser release ruling on PM’s immunity panel

The High Court of Justice on Sunday said that Knesset legal adviser Eyal Yinon, who

Chris Hedges: Rebellion Is The Only Way To Stop The Ruling Elites

Chris Hedges: Rebellion Is The Only Way To Stop The Ruling Elites Above photo: Freedom

‘Victory for Our Oceans’: US Court Upholds Ruling on Vast Marine Monument Established by Obama

youtube twitter facebook rss Source Article from https://www.globalresearch.ca/victory-oceans-us-court-upholds-ruling-vast-marine-monument-established-obama/5699017

ICC moves towards full investigation into Israeli war crimes, pending ruling on jurisdiction

After years of delays into launching a full investigation into Israeli war crimes committed in

Hits: 19

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes