Jew World Order

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2015

Richard Spencer better hurry up and get a grip on this Jew problem – the problem is getting a grip on him.

Reporting on Spencerfest 2015  – which took place at the National Press Club (wow) – for the Huffington Post, the Jewish kike Samantha Lachman titled her piece “White Nationalists Gather On Halloween To Discuss How Oppressed They Are.”

The Jew Lachman writes:

They’re not racist, they just want a white ethno-state.

The 150-plus white men who gathered on Halloween to discuss their shared European heritage and identity insisted they don’t think they’re better than other races.

They’re simply different, they said.

That all seems fair enough, that’s just like the Jews with their own ethnostate, they don’t think they’re better they just – wait –

Okay, so it’s slightly different than Jews. But it’s the same basic concept.

They’re “white advocates” and “identitarians.” “Racial idealists” or “racial communitarians.” The label “white supremacists,” to them, is a political “scare term” created by liberals and groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center to undercut “legitimate” white interests.

The conference, called “Become Who We Are,” invited other white people to gain this race consciousness so their revolution can move off Twitter, blogs and online journals and into the mainstream. Discussion topics included “The Origins of the White Man,” “The Tragedy of Southern Identity” and “Why We Will Win.”

“There’s something radical about actually being public and talking about these views seriously,” said Richard Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute, which organized the conference. “There’s a tendency in our movement to embrace the fringe — we want to be alienated from society, we want not to be taken seriously.”

???

It’s a strange statement to make to the media. Who is being accused of doing this, exactly?

“We’re trying to make this a sensible position that all white people need to think about,” he said.

Nonetheless, conference attendees wore name tags that revealed only their first names.

Spencer referenced the red pill in the movie “The Matrix” to suggest that white people were becoming “red pilled” — awakened — by their reality or lived experiences.

“You can’t get away from this general tendency to delegitimize the white man,” he said. “We totally recognize the fact that our views are considered beyond the pale, or awful — but we’ve got to start this way. The gay movement had to start at some point, Zionism had to start in the 19th century when that was considered a ridiculous, terrible notion.”

Wait – what are the gay movement and Zionism considered now?

I forget.

Oh right. They’re horrible, destructive things that are loved by Jewish kikes. Maybe pretending to think they’re good will make Jewish kikes like you.

It’s a strategy that has worked well in the past, lets roll with it (WINK WINK WINK).

After all – and correct me if I’m wrong – the gay rights movement and Zionism both got their demands met by tricking people into thinking they believed things they didn’t believe while making the insignificant sacrifice of alienating their own primary support base on a fundamental level.5

We gotta go with what works.

Of course, this insistence that their views are based on genuine differences rather than a sense of superiority is undercut by the sort of rhetoric their community uses to describe traits they believe are inherent in other races or ethnicities. Jews are manipulative. African Americans are lazy or violent. Latinos are free-riders who are stealing American jobs. Etcetera.

This reporter, who is Jewish, was one of three journalists who attended a conference session open to the press at the National Press Club in the heart of Washington. A sentiment among the event’s speakers and attendees is that Jews have rigged the American political system to encourage more open immigration policies, so they can bond together with other minorities and subjugate Americans of European ancestry.

But Jews, they said, have maintained a cohesive identity, and there’s much to admire about that.

“The Jews exist precisely because they were apart, precisely because they had, maybe you could say, a bit of paranoia about trying to stay away — please don’t quote paranoia,” Spencer said.

Maybe do a few more interviews with Jews, then learn that they will quote you even when you tell them not to quote you. I’d say it takes between 60 and 75 interviews with Jewish journalists to figure out they are dishonest people.

After 100 to 130 interviews with Jewish journalists, you figure out that saying nice things about Jews doesn’t make them like you more.

As a rule, it takes approximately 3500-4500 interviews with Jewish journalists before you realize there is nothing to be gained from interactions with Jewish journalists, and then don’t even bother inviting them to your conferences.

“The opposition to intermarriage. The creation of their own state. The recreation of their language. This is the greatest triumph of racial idealism in history. All we’re asking for is equality. The same right that Jews claim for themselves,” said Sam Dickson, an attorney who advocates for breaking up the United States to create a white ethno-state. (Dickson has represented the Ku Klux Klan in court.)

Yes, beg the Jews for equality. It’s a method which simply cannot fail. These Jews will eventually feel pity and give it to you.

It’s inevitable.

Dickson suggested that white people “could give” black people Massachusetts and New York — “blacks could be given Manhattan” — while whites would take states like Iowa. He said the white ethno-state of his imagination would be open to all whites, liberals and conservatives alike.

“White people, as we’ve become a minority, will not be able to live in a state of severe repression and discrimination,” he said. “Our ethno-state will not be a meeting of the Tea Party; it’s not going to be the Southern Baptist Convention. It’s going to be a genuine ethno-state with Christians, Catholics, alcoholics, teetotallers, gay people — it’s not going to be a subset of the right.”

Yes, explicitly say that you are going to include gays – that will make White nationalism more popular with progressives. Brilliant strat, wouldn’t have thought of it myself.

There were only about 12 or so women at the conference, which is perhaps understandable given that white nationalists on Twitter want to #BringBackThePatriarchy and force women back in the kitchen, 1950s style.

I want to do that. I’m pretty sure Richard Spencer doesn’t want to do that. But go ahead and associate him with that, because he isn’t going to blame you personally or Jews as a group, but will instead blame me.

Despite its timing, none of the conference’s attendees wore costumes. They were frightening enough dressed as themselves.

Cute ending, Jew! You should be writing for The Big Bang Theory! Neat!

The Serious Part of This Article

I do not attack other White advocates, and I never will. Even while Richard Spencer once called me a cuckservative, and his right-hand man Colin Liddell repeatedly accused me of being a secret agent for talking about the Jewish gas chamber hoax, I have no reason to show anything but support for these people, because for me, this is not about feelings or ego, but rather about stopping these kikes. Somebody has to do it, and I don’t care who as long as it gets done.

That said, I think constructive criticism is valid and indeed necessary. I do not think that it can be construed as damaging to their cause to state my opinion on their methods.

We have the same goal, which is White countries for White people, so I have no reason not to want Richard Spencer to succeed.

The issue here is that they are coming at this from an angle which I don’t think can possibly be effective. I am not concern-trolling, I am genuinely concerned.

No revolution has ever succeeded on the rallying cry of “we’re normal middle class people, please just leave us alone, please, I’m begging you leave us alone, please.” This is not a position that can incite populism, and it is impossible to have a revolution without populism.

We have a record of the way political revolutions work. The French, Bolshevik and NSDAP revolutions, for instance (two violent, one non-violent) all were based in movements which focused exclusively on the working class. Some intellectual elite supported these revolutions, but they didn’t need it explained to them why they should support them.

No White political leader in America would be expected to hang out with working class people and talk about pick-up trucks, guns, team sports and Jesus. They would, however, have to make it known to these people that they understand and care about them, and that they are fighting for their interests. My head comes close to exploding trying to comprehend how this simply reality would not be obvious to anyone and everyone.

The conference itself is not the issue necessarily. The amount of money and energy poured into it could be an issue, I suppose, but I don’t know the details of that and can’t comment; all things being equal, conferences can be a good thing. However, it seems that these people believe that the conference is somehow an end in and of itself. That end, apparently, is to look normal and by doing so get normal people to think you are normal and then become White nationalists.

Again, there is no historical precedent for this approach, just as there is no historical precedent for a revolution composed exclusively of the upper-middle class and indeed appearing, to the casual observer, to purposefully exclude and alienate working class and even lower-middle class society.

In the above interview with the Jew he invited to report on the conference, Spencer explicitly says that the purpose of the conference is to bring people off the internet into the real world. Political rallies which focused on popular issues such as immigration or Black crime would be a better way of doing this, would get a whole lot more people involved – and hundreds or thousands of times more press coverage.

I’m not even totally clear on the concept here, but presumably, press coverage is the idea, right? Otherwise it makes no sense, because no one who doesn’t already know who Richard Spencer is – from seeing him on the internet – and (at least for the most part agree with him) is going to the conference, meaning that this conference does nothing to expand the movement, or reaching out to create awareness at all.

Besides the above Huffington Post article, the only other piece on this event appears to be a Raw Story blog about the Huffington Post article, and a local DC news piece about antifa (led by Mike Isaacson, lol) protesting the event.

And a Daily Beast piece which features this header image.

This is the same image they would have used if I had thrown a Stormer conference where all attendants were required to wear SS uniforms and speakers did nothing but make gas chamber jokes; again, this speaks to the logic of making it a priority to try and get the Jewish media to be fair with you.

Again, I’m not being disparaging here, but the #BoycottStarWarsVII hashtag had tens of thousands of articles written about it and was featured on every major television news outlet. A bunch of Hollywood celebrities came out and commented on it. I dare say, this did a lot more to normalize White nationalist sentiment than Spencer’s conference, and it did so among the disenfranchised youth demographic that matters most.

Back when there was a bit of drama between myself and some of the allegedly high-brow White nationalists, Greg Johnson wrote a piece responding to my claim that middle class baby boomers are a demographic which is both impossible to appeal to and largely worthless for any type of political revolution, saying that they were worth appealing to because they have money. Well, what is the purpose of this money? What are they going to do with the money? Get better cocktails and hors d’oeuvres for their conferences?

What good is a political movement without people?

In order to get people you need a popular, simple and emotional message which is repeated over and over again, and you need a charismatic leader to say it over and over again with passion that inspires people. This is a scalable model. There is no other workable model for political revolution.

It isn’t really complicated at all. And it is scientific fact, as it has been tested and repeated. Trump is repeating it now – he won’t throw a revolution, but he is gaining widespread popular support by using this method. And look at Putin; the Russian upper class tends to dislike him, but it matters not at all because he has a 90% approval rating from appealing directly to the masses. Also, look at any other successful leader ever in history.

But Richard Spencer and the people associated with him appear to be attempting to press a message which meets only one of the four basic quota for a populist message.

Popular?

The idea of White countries for White people would be popular if people were exposed to it in the right context. Of course it would be.

Simple?

Spencer makes things way more complicated than they need to be, as you can even see in the above interview. Wanting to come across as intellectual for the sake of sounding intellectual for the sake of a small group of upper-middle class Whites means the message cannot be simple.

Emotional?

The same with simplicity not being a factor seen as appealing to said demographic, emotionality is seen as a turn-off so is avoided like the plague.

And a charismatic leader?

I don’t know if Spencer is or isn’t capable of coming across as charismatic, but if he is capable he isn’t doing it. Instead, he comes across low-energy and lacking in intensity.

A Position of Weakness

All of the combined elements of this attempt to appeal to the progressive upper-middle class by being reasonable and not a Nazi comes across as wholly weak. We see this even in the headline of the Huffington Post article – “White Nationalists Gather On Halloween To Discuss How Oppressed They Are” – this is a Jewish woman who they invited to their conference mocking them for being weak.

A DS-approved conference headline would read: “White Nationalists Gather On Hitler’s Birthday To Discuss How To Stop These Kikes.”

But the response, every time I have interacted with these people: “ooooh, no one will ever listen to you if you talk about Hitler and the Holocaust and deporting all Jews” – well then, why do so many more people listen to me than listen to Richard Spencer? Why is my reach so much greater than all of these people’s combined, if the message is less popular than theirs? Am I just a better marketer, capable of marketing a less appealing message more effectively?

Am I being accused of being some kind of marketing genius?

What is the basic reasoning for the theory that my message is not going to be as popular as theirs in the future but it is more popular now? Are they headed for a breakthrough? Is the next conference really going to set it off?

Who’s kidding who here?

Maybe I don’t have the perfect, refined message, but it is demonstrably more popular than that of Spencer, AmRen, Ramz Paul, et al. That’s just a natural fact.

The Good

I want to make it clear that I don’t view this conference as negative, overall. I consider anyone sincerely working for White interests an ally, regardless of details. My main point is that people with this type of organizational skills could and should be using those skills to generate a populist movement. I’m not really sure how that could be argued with, honestly.

However, that doesn’t mean that the conference is not, overall, a net positive (given that there is actually nothing negative about it). I’m sure those involved had a good time mixing it up, I think relationships could have been formed which could lead to more efficient action in the future, and though media coverage was very sparse, media coverage of any type is good.

Here are some articles from those who attended the conference, to give you a better idea of the positives than I’m able to give as I did not attend.

National Policy Institute 2015 – Aryan Skynet

Reports from the #BecomeWhoWeAre NPI event in Washington DC – Red Ice

“Becoming Who We Are”—An Immigration-Critical Jew Reflects On NPI’s Conference – VDARE (don’t lol, goyim)

The Matt Forney Show, Episode 110: NPI and the Great White Shark Hunt – Matt Forney

Everyone seems to have felt good about it, so at the very least it was a chance for White bonding, which is something we all desperately need.

On top of this, it is an improvement that Spencer this year invited Kevin MacDonald, and that people were talking about Jews. Spencer had previously been reluctant to discuss the world’s foremost problem. So there’s an improvement, and reason to hope that more improvements take place in the future.

To Conclude

If we want to do this White revolution thing, we can do it. A popular movement is well within our ability, just following what I’ve laid out here. It isn’t like I invented populism.

I personally don’t know what it is that Richard Spencer wants to do, because I have to assume he is educated enough to know that these conferences cannot possibly lead to anything other than more conferences.

But the conferences certainly don’t hurt anything. Richard Spencer holding conferences does not keep other people from organizing a serious political movement.

I’m here to support anyone who tries to get this thing organized and rolling.

Somebody has to stop these kikes.

Hail Victory.