Jews destroyed Ancient Greece Rome Egypt Persia Mayans etc

Jews destroyed Ancient Greece Rome Egypt Persia Mayans etc

Jews in Ancient History

We have already seen how the Jews weakened and destroyed the civilization of Egypt, but what was the process? It was the biological consequence of an encysted parasitic, growth, the Jewish alien, which had fastened itself onto the Egyptian nation and which proceeded to do everything it could to destroy its host, even though it was deriving all of its sustenance from its host. This process was repeated by the Jews in each of the ancient civilizations.

In the Old Testament, the Jews try to justify their homeless state by pointing out that God was displeased with them, and then He sent them out to wander across the earth because of their own wickedness. This theme is repeated many times in the Bible. (Greek biblos, or book). The verses of Ezekiel XXXVI: 17-20 are typical:

Son of Man, when the House of Israel dwelt in their own land, they defiled it by their own way and by their doings: their way was before me as the uncleaness of a removed woman. Wherefore, I poured my fury upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for their idols wherewith they had polluted it. And I scattered them among the heathen, and they were dispersed through the countries; according to their way and according to their doings I judged them. And when they entered unto the heathen whither they went they profaned my holy name, when they said to them, These are the people of the Lord, and are gone forth out of his land.

Thus God states that it is blasphemy for the Jews to claim to be “the people of the Lord,” and considering their record, it is a fantastic claim. He also states that they were expelled because of the blood accusation, of spilling blood before the polluted idols, the age-old custom known as “ritual murder.” Although God’s anger is given here as the reason for the Jewish Dispersion, it is notable that the blood accusation, which always was made when they were expelled from a nation, is also used.

In this regard, we should not ignore the Jewish predilection for following their innermost compulsion to spread over the civilized world, and it is even more strange that no historian or philosopher of modern times has seen fit to comment upon this worldwide phenomenon, which has had a devastating effect upon every culture which has been poisoned by them. A leading businessman, J. J. Cavanagh, has compared the dispersion of the Jews to the physiological effects of cancer.

“The Jews,” he stated in a speech to a Chicago business group, “can be best understood as a disease of civilization. They can be likened to the spread of cancer throughout the human system. Just as the Jews spread out through the civilized world, following the trade routes, so cancer cells spread through the body, travelling along the arteries and veins to every part of the system. And just as the Jews gather in critical areas of the world and begin to multiply, and strangle and poison whole communities and nations, so cancer cells gather and multiply and destroy the organs of the body, and finally, the body itself.”

Many historians of the ancient world noted the Jewish phenomenon, and commented upon it, but most of these works have since been destroyed. Among the few comments on the Jews which have survived the Jewish destruction of libraries are those of Philo and Strabo. Philo, an important historian,wrote that “Jewish communities have spread out over all the continents and islands.”

Strabo’s comments upon the Jews, written in the time of the Emperor Augustus of Rome, is even more revealing. He wrote, “There were four classes in the state of Cyrene. The first consisted of citizens, the second of farmers, the third of resident aliens, and the fourth of Jews. This people has already made its way into every city, and it is not easy to find any place in the habitable world which has not received this nation and in which it has not made its power felt.”

Strabo’s observation is probably the most illuminating comment on the Jewish problem in the ancient world. He takes care to point out that the Jews occupied a lower status than that of resident aliens — in other words, they were a group of resident aliens who were considered so dangerous that they were regarded as a group in themselves. The Jews had already become known as the destroyers of nations, and they were allowed to exercise little or no political power, but they still managed to make their power felt, as Strabo points out. They did this through their trade in precious stones and gold, and through their international connections as bankers, and as fences for stolen goods. The lending of money was a basic enterprise of this people, because it gave them power over spendthrift aristocrats, who could then be used to enslave the people for Jewish purposes.

Although the Jews tended to settle in the larger cities, they were found in the most remote outposts of the empire. The Rev. Chas. H. H. Wright, in his book “Light from Egyptian Papyri,” London 1908, page 3, says,

Not many years after the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, a colony of Jews found their way to Assuan, the southern frontiers of Egypt. There they acquired for themselves houses and fields. Some of them carried on traffic as money-lenders, and one might say, even as bankers. This is proven from the papyrus marked L , in which a regular bargain for a loan of money is duly recorded. Careful stipulations were made for interest to be paid monthly for the money so lent. Five witnesses affixed their signatures to the document. In those papyri there is mention of the House of Yahu (Jehovah), and of an altar upon which sacrifices were daily offered.

Thus the Jews, thousands of years ago, were carrying on money-lending activities in the remote province of Assuan, and these activities were an integral part of the economic and religious life of the Jewish community.

In those days, the Jews openly worshiped Baal, their God of Gold, but so vile and obscene were the orgies which they practiced before his altar that the Jewish religion was forced to go underground because of popular resentment. The idols of Baal were melted down, and the Jews renamed him Yahu, or Jehovah, and they concealed many of their religious observations in his honor.

Despite the Jews’ claims to having been the most important civilization of the ancient world, in fact the Jewish tribe in Palestine was given scant notice in ancient records. On page 54, Kastein says, in The History of Jews:

The insignificant little state of Palestine was a vassal of Assyria and on account of its very minuteness, was left to its own resources. All about it colossal powers had sprung up who desired empire.

How does one reconcile the historian of the Jews, Kastein, with his definition of Palestine as “an insignificant little state,” with the scholars and professors in our modern universities who tell their students that the Jews had the greatest civilization ever known to man? The fact is that there has never been a Jewish civilization. There have been only infections of healthy civilizations by Jewish parasitic growths, which infections have always proved fatal to their hosts.

Typical was the fate of Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar, the mightiest ruler of the ancient world, had received many complaints about the Jewish bandits operating in Palestine that he marched against them. The Babylonian armies pursued the Jews relentlessly into the deserts and wildernesses until they had killed or captured all of them. This took place in the year 586 B.C. As was customary at that time, Nebuchadnezzar took the survivors home with him as slaves. These 30,000 Jewish captives were settled in the Babylonian Empire and they were allowed to form their own settlements. The Jewish historian Gerson Cohen, writes that “Many a locality in Babylon had an exclusively Jewish population.”

Within less than five decades, Babylon was no more. Despite the freedom they enjoyed, the Jews began to plot the overthrow of the empire. A t that time, Cyrus, leader of the Persians, wished to attack Babylon and seize its riches, but he knew that his army was not strong enough. Jewish emissaries came to him and declared that they were willing to open the gates for him. At first, Cyrus suspected a trap, and he is said to have put the first such Jewish messenger to death, but the Jews later convinced him that they were sincere. They asked in return that he restore to them their land in Palestine.

In the year 539 B.C.,the army of Cyrus appeared before Babylon. On page 65, The History of the Jews, Kastein says, “The conquest of Babylon was achieved without difficulty; the city fell without a fight.” What a coincidence! That is exactly what Manetho wrote about the fall of Egypt to the Hyksos invaders. There was no battle. Although ancient history is filled with accounts of long and desperate battles between nations and sieges of cities which lasted for many years, when a city had a significant Jewish community, these battles did not seem to take place. No doubt the Jews did not wish to see their homes and businesses damaged by an attack.

Kastein continues on page 65, The History of the Jews,

“The Jews welcomed Cyrus with open arms.” Here is another theme which is repeated throughout the history of the Jews. In every nation which falls without a struggle, the Jews rush out to welcome the invaders. Kastein tells us that Cyrus allowed the Jews to return to their own country, but many of them preferred to remain in Babylon. Under the protection of Cyrus, the Jews were allowed to despoil the natives of Babylon, and what riches Cyrus did not carry off to Persia became the property of the Jews. Consequently, the Jews formed a wealthy and powerful ruling class in Babylon, and they devoted their time and money to formulating a Jewish ethic, which was written down as the Babylonian Talmud. In the English edition, published in London in 1935 as the Soncino Talmud, Rabbi Hertz says, page XXI,

“When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when they speak or write of the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish centre for a longer period than any other land; namely, from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era — 1626 years.” Note that Rabbi Hertz proudly states that after being conquered by Cyrus, Babylonia became an autonomous, or self-governing Jewish centre! No statement could be more revealing of the role played by the Jews in betraying the nation to Cyrus.

Not only did the Jews take over the Babylonian Empire, they also went home with Cyrus and formed large colonies in Persia. Max Radin, in “The Jews among the Greeks and Romans,” says page 61,

The virtual autonomy of the Persian period allowed the development of a well-organized ruling class of priests, the Soferim or Scribes, men learned in the law, who had no definite priestly functions.

What Radin does not tell us is that these scribes were not priests, they were the rulers of the autonomous Jewish community. It was Scribes of this type who met to condemn Jesus Christ to be crucified.

The influence of the Jews in the Persian Empire soon caused it to go the way of earlier civilizations. One of the shortest books of the Bible is the Book of Esther, the most Jewish of the books, and the only one in which God is not mentioned. The story of Esther gave rise to the Jews’ most important religious ceremony, the Purim festival which celebrates the victory of the Jews over the gentiles, when Esther succeeded in having Haman executed.

At this time, Ahasuerus was King of Persia, and his prime minister was a conscientious, hard-working gentile named Haman. Haman had been troubled about the growing power and insolence of the Persian Jews. Thus Esther III; 8-9:

Haman said unto King Ahasuerus: There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among thy people in all the provinces of thy kingdom; and their laws are diverse from those of every people; neither keep they the king’s laws; therefore it is not fit for the King’s profit to suffer them. If it please the King, let it be written that they be destroyed.

This request seemed reasonable enough to King Ahasuerus, and he authorized Haman to prepare for a day in the near future when the Jewish problem could be solved. Unbeknownst to them, the king’s favorite wife, Esther, was a secret Jew named
he had had her smuggled into the palace to give her charms to the King, and so the Jewish harlot became Queen.

The Jews soon learned of King Ahasuerus’ plan, and Mordecai hurried to the palace, where he informed Esther of the peril of the Jews. Esther boldly went to the King, said that she was a Jewess, and dared him to carry out Hainan’s request. The King was unable to resist her charms, and he agreed to do anything she asked. Esther asked only that the gallowswhich Haman was building to hang Mordecai and the other Jewish conspirators should be completed, and then that the King should have Haman hung there instead.

The King agreed, and when Haman had been hung, Esther forced the King to inaugurate a reign of terror against his gentile subjects. Esther VIII: 7, “Then the King Ahasuerus said unto Esther the Queen and to Mordecai, the Jew, Behold, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and him they have hanged on the gallows, because he laid his hands upon the Jews.”

The Jews made further demands, and again the King agreed, because he was unable to deny Esther anything. Esther VIII;11: “Wherein the King granted the Jews which were in every city to gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to destroy, to slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province that would assault them, both little ones and women, and to take the spoil of them for a prey.”

This verse reveals the innate bloodthirstiness of the Jews, in their demand to be allowed to massacre women and children who had done them no harm. Hainan’s action against them had been planned as a governmental program, but the Jewish counter-attack became a wild slaughter of the innocents. The massacre begins, as described in Esther VIII: 17. “And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the King’s commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.”

At Esther’s request, King Ahasuerus now hung all of Hainan’s ten sons, their only crime having been that Haman had been their father, and his house and goods were given to Esther’s relatives. The massacres of the gentiles were carried out throughout the Persian Empire, and the bloodletting of the native leaders so weakened the nation that soon afterwards the empire was easily conquered by Alexander the Great. Because Haman had cast the lot, or Pur, to attack the Jews, the victorious Jews took the name of Purim, or Day of the Lot, to celebrate their victory over the gentiles. The, last verse of Esther describes their happy Jewish community; Esther X : 3, “For Mordecai the Jew was next to King Ahasuerus, and great among the Jews, and accepted of the multitude of his brethren, seeking the wealth of his people, and speaking peace to all his seed.”

The civilizations of Egypt, Babylon and Persia had now fallen because of Jewish subversion. Next to bear the brunt of Jewish parasitism was Greece. In all history, no two peoples have been more diametrically opposed than the Jews and the Greeks, and the Jews have always borne great hatred for Greek culture. The Greeks represented the refinement of the civilized gentleman and individual, while the Jew continued to be a brutalized, earth-bound, non-creative, unartistic and nameless member of a bandit tribe.

Ralph Marcus writes, in Great Ideas of the Jewish People, page 103,

We know from recent architectural discoveries that the Hellenistic cities on the borders of Judea were rich in Greek architecture and art.

Greek culture extended to the edge of the wilderness, and it stopped where the Jewish bandits began.

In his History of the Jews, Kastein says, page 92,

The Greeks had had vast experience in this world, their imagination had been fertile and they had created much . . . that, in these circumstances, they should fall in with a people imbued with a calm and sometimes stolid and bucolic certainty where its spiritual possessions were concerned, barbarians with no sculpture or breeding, necessarily tinged their contempt with impotent wrath. The inevitably logical result of this attitude on the part of the Greeks was the growth of anti-Semitism, of hatred of the Jews.

Thus Kastein attributes anti-Semitism to the Jews, but says nothing of the Jewish hatred for Greek culture. On page 88 of his History of the Jews, he gives a more plausible reason for anti- Semitism:

Judea paralyzed the Greek attack while the Alexandrian Jews brought about the disintegration of Hellenic civilization.

This is the most startling admission which a Jewish historian has ever made about the destructive impact of the Jews. Alexandria was the intellectual center of the late Greek Empire, and its library was the greatest in the world. It was here, as Kastein says, that the Jews brought about the disintegration of Hellenic civilization. They later burned the great library, because it contained hundreds of historical references of the destructive activities of the Jews.

With Greek civilization on the decline, the Jews now began to infect Rome. From the very onset of Jewish influence in the empire, the Romans were aware of the danger, but they seemed powerless to counteract the insidious effect of the Jews. The Roman historian Diodorus wrote, “The Jews, alone of all peoples, utterly refuse to have dealings with any other people, and regard all men as enemies.”

This was not entirely accurate. The Jews regarded all other men as a species apart from themselves, in which they seem to be correct. They also regarded other men as ignorant beasts who could be used like cattle and slaughtered for the profit of the Jews. The Roman scholar Williamson comments in this regard,

The separation was not between races; it was between those who gave their allegiance to the Law of Moses and those who rejected it . . . a man of any race might be accepted (by the Jews). The one essential was the acceptance of circumcision, for which they were held in contempt by the Romans.

Thus one finds that the Jews did not exclude anyone from their gang who could accept the barbarous Law of Moses, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. A s an international underworld, the Jew needed one irrefutable sign of recognition, a physical password which would identify at once those who were with them. This identification,one on which the Jews have always insisted for this very reason, was that of circumcision. Not only did it identify those who were active Jews, but it also identified those gentiles whom the Jews had enslaved; it was the badge of Jewry. Consequently, as the Jews rose to power in the Roman Empire, and began to possess many slaves, the first thing they did was to circumcise their gentile slaves as the badge of possession. This circumcision of the gentiles roused the Romans against them. In the year 315 A.D., Emperor Constantine issued the first edict against the Jews, whom he described as “that disgraceful sect”. This edict forbade the Jews to circumcise their gentile slaves, and it also limited Jewish self-rule by forbidding them to punish members of their own race. Up to this time, the Jews had considered themselves above the Roman law, and held their own courts. Jews who rebelled against the rule of the Elders were severely punished. A t this intrusion into their government, the Jews turned against Constantine, and forced him to leave Rome. He went to Constantinople, where he set up the Byzantine Empire.

One of the greatest historians of ancient Rome was Tacitus. He wrote of the Jews,

The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their persistence to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal to one another, always ready to show compassion, but towards every other people they feel only hate and enmity. As a race, they are prone to lust; among themselves nothing is unlawful.

As Tacitus’ comments show, the Romans were well aware of the nature of the Jews as a criminal and immoral group. Why then were the Romans, a proud and ambitious people, unable to withstand the insidious effect of the Jews? The answer, oddly enough, lies in the Roman nature. A strong race, the Romans had conquered the world, including the desert of Palestine. But Rome had no defense against the Jews, who had formed their usual parasitic community in the heart of Rome. The Romans tried again and again to get rid of them. Each time, the Jews came back. Rome was the center of wealth of the world. It was impossible to keep the Jews away from such wealth. Historians refer to the expulsion of the Jews by Emperor Tiberius as the “first known example of religious intolerance i n international affairs”. This is also the first known example of the Jewish adaptation of their favorite excuse for themselves, “religious intolerance”.

The Roman historian, Valerius Maximus, wrote in 139B.C. that the Praetor of Rome forced the Jews to go back to their homeland because they had tried to corrupt Roman morals. The Roman historian Marcus says that Emperor Trajan greeted a Jewish delegation in Rome most cordially, “having already been won over to their side by the Empress Poltina”. Is not this the story of Esther once again? Like most stories about Jews, the same themes recur over and over again throughout five thousand years of recorded history.

In a papyrus found in Oxyhynchus, Egypt, a Roman named Hermaiscus is tried for treason, apparently because, like Haman in the Persian Empire, he protested against the growing power of the Jews. The papyrus states that in his defense, Hermaiscus said to the Emperor Trajan, “It distresses me to see your cabinet and your privy council filled with Jews.” Of course he was daring statement. How many other gentiles have died for like offenses during the past centuries?

Scholars and historians have offered many reasons for the downfall of the Roman Empire. One leading theory is that “the Fall of Rome stemmed from a gradual dissolution of old values”. This theory fails to state just who dissolved these values, but the record speaks for itself. Another theory is that the barbarians swept over Rome. True, this happened, but why? Why did the finest army in the world lose its will to fight, and allow naked tribesmen to take Rome without a fight? It is the same story that we find in the fall of Egypt, in the fall of Babylon, in the fall of Persia.

And here too, as in the case of the previous civilizations, we find that the parasitic community of Jews had developed a terrible pathological hatred of their gentile host. In his “History of the Jews,” Kastein says, page 192,

To the Jews, Rome constituted the quintessence of all that was odious and should be swept away from off the face of the earth. They hated Rome and her device, arma et leges, with an inhuman hatred. True, Rome had leges, laws, like the Jews. But in their very resemblance lay their difference; for the Roman laws were merely the practical application of the arma, the arms. . . but without the arms, the leges were empty formulae.

In this extraordinary paragraph, Kastein admits the feeling which the Jewish parasite always feels for the gentile host, “an inhuman hatred”. So terrible is this hatred that the most important thing for the Jew is to mask his feelings. Consequently, he always appears bearing an olive branch. His first word is “Shalom or Peace”. It is this necessity to conceal his true feelings which leads the Jew to conduct his affairs and his meetings in secret.

We have already seen how the Jew continues to hate the people he has destroyed. Centuries after Babylon is no more, the Jew fulminates again “the whore of Babylon”. But of all nations, the Jew hated Rome the most, and even today, the favorite epithet of the Jew for his opponent is “fascist”. What does the word “fascist” mean? It refers to the fasces, or rods bound together, which the Roman jurist carried to implement his punishment of the wrong-doer. It means simply the rule of law, that is, gentile law, as opposed to the bloodthirsty Jewish Law of Moses. Y et there is not a university in the world today where the student can learn this simple and accurate definition of Fascism. The Jewish professors tell the students that a “Fascist beast” is the most terrible and evil thing that anyone can be, but they never explain it any further.

Few historians make any reference to the part played by the Jews in the fall of Rome, and even fewer give any indication of the power which the Jews achieved in the empire. It is only in books published by the Jews themselves that one discovers these little known facts. And here too, one finds the facts about the assassination of Julius Caesar. How did this come about?

First of all, the Romans had made attempt after attempt to get the Jews out of Rome, but they always came back. In his book, “Jews of Ancient Rome,” Harry J . Leon of the University of Texas says, page 3,

The praetor Hispanus compelled the Jews, who attempted to contaminate the Romans, to go back to their own homes.

This book, published by the Jewish Publication Society, continues, page 5,

According to Philo (Legatio 23.155), the nucleus of the Jewish community of Rome was made up chiefly of enslaved prisoners of war. Ransomed by fellow-Jews or freed by their owners, who must have found them intractable as slaves because of their insistence on observing their dietary laws, abstaining from work on the Sabbath, and practicing their exotic religious rites. . . by the year 59 A.D. the Jews of the city were already a formidable element in Roman politics.

The politically ambitious Julius Caesar recognized the power of the Jews, which stemmed from one incontrovertible fact — Rome was made up of many opposing political groups and sects. In order to win, the politician needed the support of one group which would stick by him steadfastly, and thus influence other groups to support him. Just as in our present-day democracies, this group was the Jews. They would guarantee their support to any politician who in turn would do what they asked.

When Caesar discovered this simple truth, he sought out the Jews, and won their support. On page 8 of “Jews of Ancient Rome”, Leon says,

The Jews in the ‘Populares’, the liberal-democratic or people’s party, supported Caesar and he issued verdicts in their favor.

Things have not changed much in two thousand years. We still have the liberal-democratic party in every country, and it always represents the ambition of the Jews.

With the Jews behind him, Caesar soon became the dictator of Rome and the unchallenged ruler of the world. Alarmed by his increasing subservience to the Jews, a group of loyal Senators, led by Brutus, a former friend of Caesar’s in his pre-Jewish period, resolved to assassinate him. On page 9, Leon says,

In return for the support which he had received from the Jews, Caesar showed them his favor conspicuously, and his decrees in their behalf, which, fortunately, were recorded, exempted them from compulsory military service, allowed them to send shipments of gold to the Temple in Jerusalem, and recognized the authority of the special Jewish courts.

Thus we find that Caesar made the Jews a privileged group who were above the laws of Rome. The traffic, in gold between nations was the cornerstone of Jewish international power two thousand years ago, just as it is today. It was carried on under the guise of being a “religious” occupation, and if we understand that the religion of the Jews was and is gold, this was an accurate description. The Jewish Temple in Jerusalem was still the head- quarters of Baal, the Golden Calf, although he was now called Jehovah. Several Roman Senators tried to ban the traffic in gold, only to be overthrown by Jewish power,

On page 10, of “Jews of Ancient Rome,” Leon says, “For many nights after Caesar’s murder, groups of Jews came to weep at the site of his funeral pyre.”

Here too, nothing has changed. We saw the Jews weeping at the funeral of Roosevelt, at the funeral of Kennedy, at the funeral of Churchill. They will always be weeping when a politician who has committed himself to the machinations of world Jewry meets his end.

Leon states that Emperor Augustus, who inherited the empire after Caesar’s generals fell out among themselves, restored the special privileges of the Jews. This probably explains why he emerged stronger than the other factions which divided Rome after Caesar’s death. As Jewish decay continued, the empire rapidly weakened. After the death of Domitian in 96 A.D., the emperors of Rome were no longer of Roman birth; henceforward, they were all foreigners.

The power of the Jews was such that no Roman politician dared to attack them. Leon quotes the speech of Cicero in October, 59, before a Roman jury. Cicero was defending Lucius Asia. Flaccus had tried to enforce the ban on the Jewish shipments of gold, with the result that the Jews of Rome had him removed from office and brought back to face a trumped-up charge of embezzlement. Cicero said,

We come now to the libel involving the gold, the Jewish gold. This is obviously why the present case is being tried close to the Aurelian Steps. It is because of this particular charge that you have sought out this location, Laelius (the prosecutor), and that mob (referring to the noisy crowd of Jews whom Laelius had assembled to create a commotion at the trial). You know how large a group they (the Jews) are, and how influential they are in politics. I will lower my voice and speak just loudly enough for the jury to hear me; for there are plenty of individuals to stir up those Jews against me and against every good Roman, and I don’t intend to make it any easier for them to do this. Since gold was regularly exported each year in the name of the Jews from Italy and all our provinces to Jerusalem, F there, gentlemen of the jury, who cannot sincerely commend this action? The exportation of gold had been forbidden by the Senate on many previous occasions, and most strictly of all during my consulship. Further, that Flaccus was opposed to this barbarous Jewish superstition was proof of his strong character that he defended the Republic by frequently denying the aggressiveness of the Jewish mobs at political gatherings was an evidence of his high sense of responsibility.

This speech of Cicero’s is one of the few revelations of Jewish subversion which survived the burning of libraries. The great consul of Rome, Cicero, had to lower his voice to avoid stirring up the Jews. A Roman aristocrat, Flaccus, was removed from office and dragged back to Rome to face a false charge. Why? Because he had tried to enforce the Roman law banning the Jewish traffic in gold. The outcome of this trial was that Flaccus was acquitted of the charge of embezzlement, but the Senate ban on the shipping of gold was removed. Thus the Jews won their objective, and Flaccus was lucky to escape with his life after he had opposed them.

In the face of this power of the Jews, the Roman aristocrats were no longer able to keep order in the empire, and Rome fell to the barbarians.

Source Article from http://www.destroyzionism.com/2013/07/16/the-jews-in-ancient-history/

Related Posts
The UN Human Rights Council has issued its report on last summer’s war in Gaza,
Palestinian sentenced to 17 months over Facebook posts IMEMC 22 June — The Israeli District
The cover of Baddawi The following excerpts are from the graphic novel Baddawi, by Leila Abdelrazaq. Baddawi
Follow @hipknowsys Source Article from http://hipknowsys.blogspot.com/2015/06/s0-news-june-22-2015-radiation-storm.html
Print FriendlyWhen corporations can move about the world as they please, workers have no chance

Hits: 487

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Jews destroyed Ancient Greece Rome Egypt Persia Mayans etc”

  1. Mindig Hazudnak says:

    It is a matter of utmost urgency that these filthy parasites are eliminated. Time is running out fast…

  2. Jesus Christ ✝ Jesus Christ exposed the Jews says:

    Kicking them out will only make them come back again with a vengeance.

    They need to be dealt with the same way they have been doing to Humanity (Muslims & Christians) for centuries.

  3. Christine says:

    Good stuff. Could it be that being jewish isn’t so much a race, religion or even an ethnic quality? Maybe it’s a frequency or energy. Some people may be “jewish” but are not possessed by the jewish energies. Others may have no trace of jewish genes, yet they are every bit jewish, i.e., shrewd, clever, manipulative, extravagant, crass, showy, dishonest, theatrical, corrupt, greedy, perverted, etc. They are influenced by, or resonate with this disembodied jewish frequency.

Leave a Reply

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes