Jew World Order

The law is what is best for the community.

Originally the community was racially-homogeneous. Naturally, the law is what is best for the racial community. This provides a law of common interests, and common sense, that wins public confidence, allegiance, and state credibility. Politics husbands the race by upholding the law. The law informs politics intuitively. The root of politics is the law.

Race provides the law with its purpose, its biological purpose, that thwarts the hook-nosed invasive species. The invasive species has no legal standing. It’s the law. A race that obeys the law will survive the Jew. A lawless race falls to the Jew. The law has survival value. The law sustains the race because the law is our group evolutionary strategy.  The law is what is best for the race.

If children only knew the law, in place of the imposter Ten Commandments, they would have a future.

Where are the legal philosophers?

 It’s very difficult to get a good definition of law from legal philosophers.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.  [John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Ch. VI, sec. 57.]

Freedom is a double-edged sword from a biological point of view. Locke missed the aim of law. The aim of law is, practically speaking, the most important thing to know. From the aim of law, you will know what is and is not law.

The law regards man as man, and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved. [John Marshall Harlan, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 559 (1896).]

Not law. To the contrary, the Constitution must yield to the law. Harlan’s view won out. America is now a land of lawless, rootless politics.

The law is the supreme law of the land, not the Constitution. Where the Constitution is wrong, it must yield. This is the basis of peaceful regime change.

If (((Trump))) is an enemy of the European race, where he empowers the invasive species over the indigenous people, he can and should be removed from office. What is best for the community is what is best for the community.

Reclaiming the Law

Is it best for the community to take the law into its own hands? Absolutely.

For far too long, the community has outsourced the law to the Catholic Church, to monarchs, to hijacked Congresses, and to Jewish law professors. Once you know what the law is, you don’t need these interlopers to interpret the law for, and against, you. When you know what the law is, the law is on your side. The people must know the law to restore the law.

A solid definition of law empowers the race. Meme the law to make the law.

When enough people are on the same page as to what the law is, we can act. Amnesty is with us.

Is it best for the community to give amnesty to those who restore the law? Yes.

Is it best for the community for the police and military to take a few days off, of paid leave, while the civilians clean out the political system? Yes. It’s the law. When the law is on your side, you can do many things that make sense.

Rootless politics

Everyone should be respected by the law, and everyone should respect the law.”  [Hillary Clinton, First presidential debate, Transcript, Washington Post (September 26, 2016)]

So says the outlaw Clinton.

Laws must be justified by something more than the will of the majority. They must rest on the eternal foundation of righteousness.” [Calvin Coolidge, to the Massachusetts State Senate, January 7, 1914]

What’s in that black box of righteousness? Race? Who knows. We’ve heard about (((Muh righteousness))).

Calvin Coolidge and Hillary Clinton have a lot in common.

Law versus Logos

It is quite something how (((Christians))) will destroy the law with trick concepts.

It would take a sneaky bastard hungry for WHITE GENOCIDE to concoct Logos as a replacement for race, to corrupt the law and destroy our racial defenses. Why build a wall to keep Jews out, if Jews can profess faith to get over the wall? Jews are the outlaws. They must stay out. You need an ironclad conceptual structure to keep them out. “Jews look hwhite to me,” fails us. Logos fails us.

Thanks to Renegade Radio, the Logos went up in flames. (10 min mark)

Jan Irving, who lied about having a Jew wife, is now known for his infamous syllogism. Jesus is the Logos. If you don’t accept the Logos, you’re a Jew. When Jews convert to Logos, they are no longer Jews.

Jewish logic at its inverted best!

Logos logic is logic unhinged from race. Race-wrecking rabbinical cults (capitalism, communism, Christianity) run on Logos logic.

To live in Logos is to live in delusion.

Affirm the Pagan

Pagan means farmer, like the Boer. Farmers are independent people who can raise their own families. They don’t need centralized Jewish authority. Centralized Jewish authority needs them for food and soldiers, which they are drafted into supplying. Naturally, a globalist religion, like Catholicism, would hate pagans and want to break their intuitive racial spirit to serve the Jews, the (((Logos))). Logos is the enemy of the race.

The law is our group survival strategy against the Jew. That is why the Jew needs to control the law; to throw sand in our gears.

The only law that a Christian should listen to and read is the law of God’s Commandments. And it is not right to comply with, implement or observe any other law.  [Jan Hus]

It is not right to do what is right for the racial community? That’s logos logic. How can a race survive with Christianity?

Deracinated legal philosophers do everything they can to escape defining law because race will emerge as its aim and origin. Has no philosopher wanted to define the law as what is best for the race, for that reason?

This points to the larger issue of deracination.

Outlaw Barbara Spectre

Law versus Deracination

Deracination is a masonic-mental disorder, akin to the mental disorder of a transsexual. Both plague masonic-America.

The deracinated man thinks he has overcome his racial constitution the way a transsexual thinks he has overcome his genetic sex.

There is a disorder of the mind to the body, and a disorder of a man to his race. Liberalism is a mental disorder of deracination. It gives rise to open borders madness and “citizen of the world” megalomania. “Virtue-signaling” is a manifestation of the deracinated soul fighting for fool’s gold.

A healthy mind must have survival value. A racial spirit has survival value. Racial spirit must be a factor in mental health. When you can’t see the obvious danger of the open borders, you’re mentally ill. Jews pathologize healthy racialism among non-Jews, yet a healthy racial spirit is critical to European survival. Without a racial spirit, “Europe will not survive.”  Racial spirit cures liberalism. Jew laws and Jewish psychology are pathological because they induce mental disorder.

A culture of law cures deracination by banning the Jew and his subversion. That protects the women and children.

Do we have such a culture of law? Did Moses tell us what the law is? Did Locke? Did Jefferson? Do the Jews who infest the legal profession tell us what the law is? Everything they say obscures the law.

The philosophy of law is a basket case of vagaries between the law as an ideal and the law as it is legislated. What falls short of the ideal is not law. The ideal remains an undefined. The black hole is covered up in talk of natural law or god’s law (logos), but never the law of race. Race is the most obvious basis for law.

Race gives the law its vitality and significance.

We must get the law on our side. Know what the law is. Meme the law to make the law.

The fever for equality exists only because the law is not understood in the culture. If the law were understood, as what is best for the race, Jews would have no chance to nag for it. Equality-nagging would fall on deaf ears. Your enemy is not your equal. People would be immune to the Jew because they have law!

The fever for equality rises from infiltration and racial conflict. Civilization rides the racial tides. When Jews replace Europeans in power positions, our civilization collapses. We lose the law, the arts, our history memory, culture, blood, and borders.

Civilization is the permanent expression of values conductive to racial development. The law is one such permanent expression. Thus, the law secures civilization. We must protect the law from Jews.

The desperation for “individual” rights flows from the fear that the gates have been broken, that the Jew rules, that one’s community spirit has been broken, that the law and your community are not with you. Every man for himself.

It is natural for there to be in-group equality and outgroup inequality in terms of race.

Is it best for the community that Jews dominate Gentiles? No. It’s against the law. Is it best for the community to give the Jews the boot? Yes.

Women’s Vote

Is it best for European women to have the right to vote?

What if women had the right to vote before black males, say in 1800? Would there have been a Civil War? Would the US have gone into WWI or WWII? How did black men get the right to vote before white women, and was that best for the community? Are women able to restrain men from falling into (Jew) wars? If they are, then their voice keeps the peace. Women were given the vote after WWI, too late to make a difference, but was it an admission of guilt? Jews lead men to war. Women have to pick up the pieces.

Women should have the right to neutralize Jews.

Weiner. Weinstein. Polanski. Spitzer. Schneiderman. Woody Allen. Jack the Ripper.

Women have the right to neutralize the (((mockingbird))). The lives of their sons depend on it.

That’s best for the community. That’s the law.

The law for blacks

It is doubtful that blacks need more than one law. “You’re free to kill any other black who disses you; if they smooth it over, you can let them off the hook.” This would make blacks self-policing. Instead of black-on-black crime, there would be black-on-black justice.

In the right hands, the law works wonders.

Is it best for the community to have allowed Obama to drive the black astronauts of the pavement into the suburbs? No. It is not best for the community. Should the community put up with it? No. The community should stand up for the law.

Is it best for the community to destroy the rape invaders, whose only crime is wanting to impregnate our poor women and children? The law gives a ready answer.

The law resolves many issues some consider too complicated. Because the law is simple, the law is empowering.

Is it best for the community to abandon Christian free love for invaders? Yes, it’s best for the community. The law sets things right.

The law embodies racial righteousness. The law sculpts religion.

FAKE LAW

How do the Ten Commandments stand as law, when we know what the law is?

1. I am the Lord thy God, thou shall not have any gods before me.
2. You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything.
3. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.
4. Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.
5. Honor your father and your mother.
6. You shall not murder.
7. You shall not commit adultery.
8. You shall not steal.
9. You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
10. You shall not covet your neighbor’s house, wife, or property.

There’s no commandment against rape! The Lord blesses rape by omission.

The Ten Commandments are pathetic. The first four are silent on race. How can they be law? Is this the best that god can do?

Since art beautifies the race, and since art is necessary for our health and spiritual nobility, how could art be outlawed? This commandment goes against what is best for the community. Moses is an outlaw.

Since the number of gods we should have is unknown, and what they are owed is unknown, is it best for the community to make a law of it? Exclusivity is an issue of law, of violence? Should Yahweh get an exclusive contract, a Jewish monopoly, on the temple business? It is insanely dangerous to divide the race, to force the community to kneel to Yahweh, the volcano god, and to be locked into that. No one likes to be locked into a cell phone contract. Why be locked into a Jewish salvation contract? Jews want that lock on god, and god’s law. It’s their nose ring for our race. (((Monotheism))) is their gas chamber.

These lawless commandments are Jewish domination, framed over the appendage of “normal” commandments, to give it the appearance of law. It only sounds like law.

Should we have law because it tickles the nipples of god, or because it is best for the race? You don’t get better law, by saying, your laws comes from god. Logos logic and logos law sucks.

The law is with the Volksavers

With the right definition of law, we can recapture the law from Jews and the Jew lobby.

Good definitions manifest destiny.

The Volk is the community. The law emerges out of the Volk.  The law has to serve the Volk. The law is with the Volksavers.

National Socialist Germany was a lawful nation, where its laws served the race. The Basic Law imposed on Germany is basically not law. It lets Merkel get away with murder, rape, and treason. The law will catch up to her in the long run.

With the law on our side, and widely known, the law secures our sovereignty.