NYT’s Fake News about Fake News

NYTs Fake News about Fake News

By WashingtonsBlog
washingtonsblog.com

By Robert Parry, the investigative reporter who many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. Originally published at Parrys Consortium News (republished with permission).

A grave danger from the Western mainstream medias current hysteria about fake news is that the definition gets broadened from the few made-up stories that are demonstrably false often fabricated by kids to get more clicks to include reasonable disputes about the facts of a complex controversy.

This danger has grown worse because The New York Times, The Washington Post and other major Western news organizations have merged their outrage over fake news with the Wests propaganda campaign against Russia by claiming without evidence that the Russian government is somehow putting out false stories to undermine Western democracy.

However, when news organizations actually track down fake news outlets, they are usually run by some young entrepreneurs from outside Russia who saw made-up stories as a way to increase revenue by luring in more readers eager for information that supports their prejudices.

Yet, a front-page Times article on Tuesday, citing fake news as a threat to Europe, contains what arguably is fake news itself by claiming that many of the purported 2,500 stories discredited by the European Unions East Stratcom operation have links to Russia although the Times doesnt identify those links.

The article by Mark Scott and Melissa Eddy then goes on to blur these two separate concepts: In a year when the French, Germans and Dutch will elect leaders, the European authorities are scrambling to counter a rising tide of fake news and anti-European Union propaganda aimed at destabilizing peoples trust in institutions.

But it is this mushing together of fake news and what the Times describes as anti-European Union propaganda that is so insidious. The first relates to consciously fabricated stories; the second involves criticism of a political institution, the E.U,, which is viewed by many Europeans as elitist, remote and disdainful of the needs, interests and attitudes of average citizens.

Whether you call such criticism propaganda or dissent, it is absurd to blame it all on Russia. When it comes to destabilizing peoples trust in institutions, the E.U. especially with its inept handling of the Great Recession and its clumsy response to the Syrian refugee crisis is doing a bang-up job on its own without Russian help.

Yet, rather than face up to legitimate concerns of citizens, the E.U. and U.S. governments have found a convenient scapegoat, Russia. To hammer home this point to make it the new groupthink E.U. and U.S. leaders have financed propaganda specialists to disparage political criticism by linking it to Russia.

Even worse, in the United States, the Times and other mainstream publications reflecting the views of the political establishment have editorialized to get giant technology companies, like Facebook and Google, to marginalize independent news sites that dont accept the prevailing conventional wisdom.

There is an Orwellian quality to these schemes a plan for a kind of Ministry of Truth enforced by algorithms to weed out deviant ideas but almost no one whose voice is allowed in the mass media gets to make that observation. Even now, there is a chilling uniformity in the endless denunciations of Russia as the root of all evil.

Though the Times article treats the E.U.s East Stratcom operatives as 11 beleaguered public servants sticking their fingers in the dike to protect the citizenry from a flood of Russian disinformation, stratcom actually is a euphemism for psychological operations, i.e., the strategic use of communications to influence the thinking of a target population.

In this case, the target populations are the European public and to an ancillary degree the American people who get to absorb the same propaganda from The New York Times. The real goal of stratcom is not to combat a few sleazy entrepreneurs generating consciously false stories for profit but to silence or discredit sources of information that question the E.U. and U.S. propaganda.

More Stratcom

NATO has its own Stratcom command based in Latvia that also is assigned to swat down information that doesnt conform to Western propaganda narratives. The U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S.-funded National Endowment for Democracy also pour tens of millions of dollars into media operations with similar goals as do major Western foundations, such as currency speculator George Soross Open Society. Last December, the U.S. Congress approved and President Obama signed legislation to create an additional $160 million bureaucracy to combat Russian propaganda.

In other words, the Wests stratcom and psychological operations are swimming in dough despite the Times representation that these anti-disinformation projects are unfairly outgunned by sinister forces daring to challenge what everyone-in-the-know knows to be true.

If these stratcom operations were around in 2002-2003, they would have been accusing the few people questioning the Iraq-has-WMD certainty of putting out fake news to benefit Saddam Hussein. Now, journalists and citizens who dont buy the full-Monte demonization of Russia and its President Vladimir Putin are put into a similar category.

Instead of trusting in the free exchange of ideas, the new attitude at the Times, the Post and other Western news outlets is to short-circuit the process by smearing anyone who questions the official narratives as a Putin apologist or a Moscow stooge.

Beyond being anti-democratic, this anti-intellectual approach has prevented serious examination of the facts behind the Wests war or words against Russia. To shut down that debate, all you need to do is to say that any fact cited at a Russian news outlet must be false or fake news. Any Westerner who notes the same fact must be a Putin puppet.

Western stratcom doesnt even want to allow Russian media to criticize politicians who are criticizing Russia. The Times article lamented that Many false claims target politicians who present the biggest obstacles to Moscows goal of undermining the European Union. The Times, however, doesnt offer any examples of such false claims.

Instead, the Times writes that Russian news channels had targeted the [French] presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron, who belongs to the party and is running on a pro-European Union platform.

But what does that mean? Is it now an act of aggression when newscasts in one country criticize a leader of another country? If so, are the European news channels that have targeted U.S. President Donald Trump somehow deserving of U.S. government retaliation? Doesnt the E.U. and by extension The New York Times accept the idea of political disagreement and debate?

This closed-mindedness is especially dangerous indeed existentially risky when applied to a confrontation between nuclear-armed powers. In such a case, the maximum amount of debate should be encouraged, instead of what amounts to blacklisting dissidents in the West who wont toe the official propaganda lines.

Media Censors

Disturbingly, the leading forces in this suppression of skepticism are the most prestigious newspapers in the United States and Europe. Even after the disastrous experience with the Iraq War and the bogus WMD groupthink, Western news outlets that were party to that fiasco have virtually excluded well-reported articles and documentaries that question the U.S. and E.U. narratives of the New Cold War.

For instance, there has been almost no presentation in the mainstream Western media of an alternative and I would argue more complete and accurate narrative of the Ukraine conflict, taking into account the countrys complex history and deep ethnic divisions.

It is essentially forbidden to refer to the violent overthrow of elected President Viktor Yanukovych three years ago as a coup or a putsch or to cite evidence of a U.S.-backed regime change, such as an intercepted phone call between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt in which they discussed how to glue and how to midwife the installation of a new leadership in Kiev.

In the supposedly free West, you can only refer to the post-coup events in Crimea, in which the people of the largely ethnic Russia area voted overwhelmingly to secede from Ukraine and rejoin Russia, as a Russian invasion. No skepticism is allowed even though there were no images of Russian troops wading ashore on Crimeas beaches or Russian tanks crashing across borders. The invasion supposedly happened even though no invasion was necessary because Russian troops were already in Crimea under the naval basing agreement at Sevastopol.

Amid the Wests current hysteria about Russian propaganda, U.S. and E.U. citizens are not even given the opportunity to watch well-reported documentaries about key moments in the New Cold War, including an eye-opening investigative report debunking the Western propaganda myth constructed around the death of Russian accountant Sergei Magnitsky or a well-produced historical account of the Ukraine crisis.

Western news outlets and governments even take pride in blocking such dissenting views and contrary information from reaching the American and European publics. Like East Stratcom the E.U.s Brussels-based 11-member team of diplomats, bureaucrats and former journalists establishment institutions see themselves bravely battling Russian disinformation. They see it as their duty not to let their people hear this other side of the story.

If that is what the Wests institutions have come to dismissing reasonable criticism and thoughtful dissent as Russian disinformation is it any wonder that they are losing the confidence of their people?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DarkPolitricks/~3/FUSFuH4Gq94/

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes