Jew World Order

—–Original Message—–
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 14 January 2012 16:04
To: ‘Kerry Rzezkik’
Cc: ‘chris merrett ‘
Subject: Re: Inquiry as to an allegation about publishing slander about Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)

@Gentlemen,
Kerry Rzezkik alleges he/she is the sub-editor for the criminal slanderer Chris Merrett at Sly Ink. Chris has taken many months to give me contact details for Kerry.
This email is only relevant for those people who want to keep up with the cases of slander by Chris Roubis and “Illuminati Ingrid” as we have evidence Chris Merrett is co-operating with Ingrid in this criminal slander. Since this slander of people like Tim, John, Mark, myself has been quite widespread I am working my way back to their employers who are aiding and abetting known criminals.
If not relevant to you please just delete.
Chris Merrett seems so delusional that he said “just google sly ink”. Well the google results show a very non descript company. Not even a web site.
http://www.hotfrog.com.au/Companies/S…
http://www.austcrimefiction.org/categ…
Thanks
Your brother peter

Hi Kerry,
For a start, MR. NOLAN is a juristic person. You seem to be unaware of this. You are a very ignorant person it seems.
My calling is Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) and that is what you are invited to use. Why would you try to talk to a juristic person?
I have a starting question. I will number my questions to make it easier for you to keep track of your answers.
Q1. Are you male or female? 
I ask this because you have failed to answer any of my very direct questions with direct answers. This is a typical response of women, though Chris Merrett also indulges himself in this behaviour. It has taken him many months to provide me your contact details. So I was wondering if you are female. You write like one.
“To be honest I must say I derive some amusement from your statement that one of my writers is mentally unhinged”

I recommend you read what Chris has been saying then.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
You wish to make the claim that comments like these would come from someone who is NOT mentally unhinged? You are kidding me, right?

“I can confirm that Chris Merrett is one of many freelance writers employed by me in my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink.”
I didn’t ask you if Chris Merrett was one of your freelance writers. Let me repeat the questions and number them. Please answer the questions I ask and please do not make irrelevant and misleading comments that you were not asked about.
Q2. Are you publishing materials about me provided to you by this criminal slanderer?  
Q3. Are you paying this man to publish such materials?
Now. You have not answered these two questions and I would like answers to those two questions please.
“your allegations will not change this”
“Mr Merrett being only one of 3 writers that have been working on your particular case. The vast majority of this information has been gleaned from your own material.”

I claim that your other writers have the right to know that they are in serious trouble of being associated with a serious crime. They also have the right to know that my calling and name are copyrighted worldwide and should they choose to use my calling or name without my permission they will be held accountable for copyright infringement. I suggest you pass me their work email addresses so that I can inform them of this directly. I will post this to CAF so they know you were asked for this information and WHEN you were asked for this information.
“my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink”
I assume you have an editor and or publisher you work for. I recommend you pass me the name and email address of the most senior person in your company so that I can also issue a Lawful Notice to him/her as to the criminal acts being committed by someone in his/her employ.
Q4. What is the calling and contact details for your editor/publisher and the most senior person in your company.
That you have responded with my initial email in the reply is taken as evidence that you have been well informed that my calling and name are copyrighted worldwide and that any further use of my name, calling or image by you, your company or anyone in your employ is a copyright infringement. You are a publisher. You should know about copyright infringement.
Now. Some axioms of law that you might wish to keep in mind. These will be applied to you.
“Ignorance of the law is no excuse”.
And by law that actually means natural law which is commonly called “common law” and not legislation created by UCC legal entities like the commonwealth of Australia.
“All men (and women who claim equality just in case you are female) are equal before the law”.
As far as I am aware you have committed no crimes. Later this week I will issue you with a Lawful Notice.
Q5. Are you willing to accept Lawful Notices to your fax machine or email to save on sending paper from Germany to Melbourne? Save a tree and all that? Should you agree to receive Lawful Notices this way I shall return the favour and accept electronically transmitted documentation.
The Lawful Notice will lay out my proposed remedy pending you giving direct answers to my direct questions.
Q6. If you have, indeed, published any articles containing my calling, name or image of me, please provide PDF copies of the full magazine in which these articles were published. According to Chris Merrett he has been publishing slander about me.
“I also find it amusing that you seem to sincerely believe you can circumvent the Australian Justice System by starting your own.”
You seem to be unaware of the position in which you find yourself in Australia today. The Australian Federal Government is a criminal cartel and it is in league with the banks, the legal fraternity, the MEDIA, the police and the medical fraternity just to name a few of the components of the control grid in which you live. You are living in a police state and you seem to not even be aware of this.
You seem to not have read this letter by Sir Harry Gibb on the Constitutional Crisis. He specifically makes the point that there is no basis in law for the judiciary to be acting.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
You seem also to be unaware of the great work done by the likes of Ian Henke in proving that the federal government is a bunch of criminals and that the Tax Office was not legally created.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
As a “sub-editor” of some sort of “investigative journalism” I would have thought you would know that the entire legal framework of Australia is a giant hoax. After all? I walked into the Australian Federal Magistrates Court on November 26^th 2009 and video recorded a man calling himself David Dunkley commit the crime of impersonating a federal magistrate and I put that video on you tube about a year later.  Surely Chris has pointed you to this video, right? It is one of the most significant pieces of video evidence created against the criminals in the parliament.
Perhaps you might read some of these Lawful Notices. Take particular note of the one to the members of the federal parliament.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…
So. While I have been working on creating an alternative system of law and establishing a lawful judiciary outside the control of these criminals? You seem to be saying to me that you have been paying a man to slander me. I am wondering if that is really what you have been doing. Hence I am asking you for copies of any materials that you have published that contain my calling, my name or my image.
As I said. So far you are not guilty of any crime as far as I know. You seem to be guilty of an extraordinary level of stupidity and ignorance as well as seem to be quite arrogant about that stupidity and ignorance. But being stupid, ignorant and arrogant are not crimes that I am aware of.
Should you refuse to hand over to me all materials published by your company that include my calling, name or image and you have, in fact, published such? This will be the crime of suppression of evidence of a crime. We will get such evidence at a later date via the new courts.
Should you attempt to interfere with the process of putting Chris Merrett on trial or should you further engage Chris Merrett in any capacity what so ever that will be the crime of aiding and abetting a known criminal. You are now aware Chris Merrett is a criminal. It does not matter how long you have known him. It does not matter what you think of him. So those comments you make are not relevant. I knew my ex wife for 32 years before she decided to become a criminal.
Chris now has the same status as a bank robber, paedophile or rapist. That of being a criminal. To assist him you will be committing the same crime as if you are assisting a bank robber, a paedophile or a rapist.
That it will take us a little time to organize our courts and put him on trial is hardly our fault. We are doing the best we can despite criminal slanderers like Chris Merrett attempting to disrupt that process.
To be clear. Chris Merrett has publicly called me a wife beater and a paedophile which is the crime of slander.
He has falsely alleged connections to convicted criminals which is the crime of slander.
A person does not become a criminal when they are found guilty. They become a criminal when they commit the crime. Now you know he has committed these crimes and the evidence he has committed them has been presented to you any aid or support to this man is aiding and abetting a known criminal and you will be accused of this crime in due process should you commit it.
Chris is not “accused” of a crime. He IS a criminal. There is a BIG difference. All the evidence for this has been presented into the public. The process of finding him GUILTY of being a criminal will be run in due course.
If you allow your other writers to present slander about me in the future you will be accused of aiding and abetting their crime of slander as well.
You say “I have total faith in the veracity of any article he submits for publication, as I do all of my freelancers and”. Given this?
Q7. Are you also willing to accept lawful responsibility for what your writers put into your magazine?
This means that if one of your writers commits slander are you willing to also take responsibility for what is printed or are you willing to merely be held as aiding and abetting a known criminal?
Your choice.
If you are so confident of the veracity of your writers then you should have no problem being accountable before a court of law for anything they write that is slanderous, right? So put your money where your mouth is. Lets see if you are willing to put in writing that you are prepared to also stand trial for slander should anything Chris Merrett has published in your magazine turn out to be slanderous. Are you willing to do that?
So. Kerry.
I have asked you SEVEN very simple and very direct questions. Most of them are Yes or No answers. Others are very simple questions to provide me with information.
Lets see if you can “act like a man” and actually answer the questions put to you this time, eh?
After all. Chris Merrett has a psychopathic inability to answer questions. It took him MONTHS to answer the question of your contact details. Seems he does not share the same confidence in you as you allege you have in him.
Oh. By the way?
Chris is the most hopeless “investigator” I have ever met. He claims Robert Kennedy and John Rambo are myself. Laughable.
He also claims he can not find the evidence my wife is a perjurer despite the fact it is published here.
http://www.crima…
Kerry.
Chris Merrett is a mentally unstable man who is a criminal slanderer. If you can not see that then your perception skills must be totally appalling. I will bring this to the attention of your bosses as you are creating liabilities for them that they are well advised not to undertake. I am pretty sure that the further up I go the better hearing I will get as to how terrible your perception skills must be to allow this man to write for your magazine.
Lastly? The Commonwealth of Australia is a UCC Legal Entity Registered on the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore all legislation of the COA is UCC based legislation and NOT LAW. All my communication is issued under natural law also called Common Law. All disputes will be handled in the Peoples Court of Australia that we are establishing. The price of slandering me is $A10,000 per incident. So I am very keen for you to put your money where you mouth is and agree to ALSO be liable for any slander published about me. I plan to collect. If you are so sure of yourself you will have no problems betting your house on it, eh?
After all the criminals in the courts took my house off me. Only fair I take your house off you and Chris, eh?
I look forward to your answers to my SEVEN questions.
Have a good weekend.
Peter-Andrew: Nolan©

Mr Nolan,
Thank you for you interesting email. I can confirm that Chris Merrett is one of many freelance writers employed by me in my capacity as sub-editor at Sly Ink.

To be honest I must say I derive some amusement from your statement that one of my writers is mentally unhinged, given not only the contents of your emails to me, but also given the information provided to me by my writers, Mr Merrett being only one of 3 writers that have been working on your particular case. The vast majority of this information has been gleaned from your own material.

I also find it amusing that you seem to sincerely believe you can circumvent the Australian Justice System by starting your own.

I have known Chris Merrett personally for over 11 years, and have engaged him in a professional capacity since 2004. I have total faith in the veracity of any article he submits for publication, as I do all of my freelancers and your allegations will not change this.

Kerry Rzeznik.

1. My calling and the name PETER ANDREW NOLAN are copyrighted world wide. And I can revoke rights to use my copyrighted materials to anyone I choose. The contract is here.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/a…

You are hereby noticed that any future use of my calling or name or any derivation of such will be a copyright infringement. Please note the fee for this.
 

5. At this moment, as far as I am aware, you have not committed any crime. Hence I am writing to you to ask you if you have unwittingly associated yourself with a crime.

If you have published slander about me then the crime is with Chris Merrett, not yourself. However, now that you have been informed of this crime,  should you have inadvertently published slander, you are obliged by common law to hand over any and all evidence you have of this crime and you are required to co-operate fully in order to bring prosecution of this crime to our new courts.

Failure to fully co-operate bring a known criminal in your employ to justice will result in a criminal accusation of aiding and abetting a known criminal. “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” and by that is meant common law. Your lawyers are no good to you as they do not perform law services. They “practice law” which means they are NOT performing law. Lawyers only deal with legislation and statutes. They do NOT deal with law. And the jurisdiction I am applying is common law.

I am a sovereign and I retain the right to perform all LAW pertaining to myself and my property.
 

6. I would strongly recommend you do not dismiss this email and do not consider that I can not do what I say I can do.

We are about to put all federal politicians on trial. If you have, in fact, published slander about me and refuse to assist me remedy that crime by aiding and abetting a known criminal, then you too will be prosecuted.
 

As I mentioned. I believe these are just the delusional ramblings of a man who is mentally unhinged.

I can not imagine any sensible publisher would believe a word Chris Merrett writes. I am sure that as a publisher you will be aware of his on line activities and his regular slandering of people.