Peace Should Be Integral To The Women’s March

Peace Should Be Integral To The Women’s March

Above photo: From USA Today.

NOTE: I agree with Cindy that Peace needs to be stated loudly and clearly as part of the Women’s March, but I have much greater concerns about the march. It was founded in 2017 by women with strong ties to the Democratic Party to harness the anti-Trump momentum and channel it into growing the base of support for Democrats in the upcoming elections. This year, the theme of the march is to Get Out the Vote. Some of the hash tags used for the march were #BlueTsunami2018 (not “Women’s Tsunami”) and #UniteBlue. The New York Times writes:

This tactic has been used by the Democrats for a long time. They latch onto popular movements and sentiments, portray themselves as the party of the movement and convince participants to channel their energy into campaigning for Democrats, only to continue to serve the interests of the wealthy and disregard the movement when in power. They are masters at making excuses for why they would really like to serve the voters but they just don’t have the votes, or that issue just isn’t on the table. If that doesn’t work, they blame it on the Republicans or some other outside force or more emergent matter.

If people are truly interested in organizing for change, then it is important to see through this charade. The electoral system serves the wealthy. It won’t be changed from within. Recognize that it is the Democrats and Republicans who make the laws and they won’t do anything that lessens their power.

The history of successful social movements demonstrates that  change doesn’t come from the ballot box, it comes from organized and strategic popular power that is clear in its demands.

Yesterday, I posted the message below on Facebook. It received a large and immediate response. Some people understood what I was saying. Others were stuck in the trap of the two-party system, and others were questioning how to build power.

I recommend reading Lance Selfa’s “The Democrats: A Critical History” to understand what the Democratic Party is. And I recommend studying resistance movements to understand how to build popular power and see through the tricks of the power holders.

Together, we can win, but not by being misled down false paths.  – Margaret Flowers

 

There is one thing missing from  the upcoming Women’s March publicity and philosophy: the urgent need for Peace not War!

The March will speak out against hate, discrimination and exploitation. That’s good.

The March will also speak out strongly in favor of equality, women’s reproductive choice and respect for all people regardless to disability, gender, orientation, etc.. That’s also good.

But the subject of US military aggression and war is essential. We hope that many marchers will include this in their signage and discussions.  Despite many antiwar groups and individuals actively advocating for “peace” to be in the platform/demands of the March, this is the second year peace is being minimized or ignored by the organizers.

For the past century the US has intervened aggressively against governments the Washington establishment does not like. A partial list includes Philippines, Korea, Guatemala, Iran, Cuba, Chile, Vietnam,Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Panama, Lebanon, Somalia,  Haiti, Afghanistan, Iraq, Venezuela, Honduras,  Libya and Syria!

These acts of “regime change”  have killed millions of people including many thousands of our own youth, both women and men. They have resulted in hundreds of thousands returning home injured physically or psychologically. Mothers, wives, sisters, aunts, and other family and friends have been profoundly, permanently, and unnecessarily handed a lifetime of pain and sorrow because of the US war machine.

Shouldn’t it be a priority to change the policies and acts of economic aggression and military intervention that result in violence, war and destruction?

Shouldn’t we address the causes of the refugee crisis as well as the symptom? After all, most refugees never wanted to leave their homelands.

We are sure that most of the women and allies who will be attending the Women’s March agree with us on the need for action and protest against our ongoing wars.

The escalating military budget is driving our country further and further into debt. Meanwhile infrastructure is decaying, health care and housing is diminishing and education is underfunded. College students now graduate with astronomical student debt. Meanwhile there is growing police oppression.

We must include PEACE in our march because unless we can stop the trend, a nuclear war is going to destroy civilization.  There is no such thing as a winnable nuclear war and dismantling ALL nukes should be at the forefront of any of our activism.  The continuity of human life on our planet is at stake. These are Womens’ issues.

As we demand a change in tone and behavior in the White House, we must also demand a change in US international foreign policy away from militarism and aggression.

The demand for peace not war should be integral to the Women’s March.

Cindy Sheehan is the mother of Specialist Casey Sheehan who was killed in Iraq in 2004; she is an antiwar activist, author of seven books, Executive Producer and host of Cindy Sheehan’s Soapbox.

Rick Sterling is an investigative journalist.

Source Article from https://popularresistance.org/peace-should-be-integral-to-the-womens-march/

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes