Smithfield Sued For Misleading Consumers With False Claims Of Superior Safety

Smithfield Sued For Misleading Consumers With False Claims Of Superior Safety

Above image: Smithfield Farms Undercover video.

Nonprofit alleges Smithfield products, commonly contaminated with dangerous pathogens and produced under dangerous conditions, can’t be marketed as ‘safest’ possible

The Organic Consumers Association announced that it has sued Smithfield Foods for falsely advertising Smithfield pork products as the “safest” U.S. pork products.

The complaint was filed on behalf of OCA by Richman Law Group in D.C. Superior Court, under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act.

“Consumers are unlikely to know that the USDA has notified Smithfield slaughter plants on multiple occasions that their pork was more likely to be contaminated with salmonella than similar products in slaughter plants of the same size,” said Ronnie Cummins, OCA co-founder and director.

“Failure to report these notifications to consumers is one thing. But claiming that its products are the ‘safest’ possible pork products in the U.S. is a blatant misrepresentation of the brand’s actual safety record,” Cummins said. “The current heightened consumer concern about safety in the meat industry is all the more reason to hold Smithfield accountable for false safety claims.”

In the complaint, OCA alleges that on numerous occasions, the U.S. Department of Agriculture testing of Smithfield pork has detected pathogens that are “commonly associated with human illness” and resistant to antibiotics. This makes the products far less than the “safest possible” in the U.S., according to OCA.

The suit also alleges that many disease strains detected in Smithfield products have been found to be resistant to antibiotics that are designated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration as “highly important” or even “critically important” for human health.

OCA also alleges that Smithfield employs production practices that result in less safe conditions and products, including crowded conditions, the use of potentially carcinogenic drugs and rapid slaughter methods. Such practices contribute to the emergence of widespread diseases, including those that can be transmitted from animals to humans.

A copy of the full complaint can be found here.

Source Article from https://popularresistance.org/smithfield-sued-for-misleading-consumers/

Related Posts
Bionic Eyes With Superior Optics and Night-Vision Are Coming Soon

(TMU) – Will people with eyesight loss soon view the world through bionic vision? A Read more

‘Sure doesn’t look like May’: Lake-effect snow blows across Lake Superior coastline

  Unseasonable weather conditions hit the coastal towns along Lake Superior in northern Michigan on May Read more

The Leftist Guardian Declares Women Genetically Superior to Men

That’s right, subhumans, leftists have gone Full Fash on the woman question, declaring females genetically Read more

Hits: 8

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply


The maximum upload file size: 100 MB.
You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, other.
Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded.

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes