Jew World Order

THE AUSTRALIAN ELECTION WAS A FRAUD

The Fraudulent Election By Brian Shaw

To better understand why this article is termed The Fraudulent Election the structure
and existence of the City of London must be introduced into the issue
The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, Private, Independent, Sovereign State
occupying approximately one square mile within the heart of the Greater London area inside the old Roman Walls of London The commercial hub emanates from Guildhall the house of guilds or in today’s structure – Speculative Freemasonry operating through the House of the Temple The entrance point between the outer and inner City of London is at Temple Bar in Fleet Street London, or in simple terms “The Bar of the Temple”;

From this hub all Law and Finance is controlled and run, through what is called “The
Corporation” or “The Firm” The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia is a Constitution granted to the people of Australia to give the illusion of Self Government, but, at all times the Corporation of the City of London controls and manipulates the Constitution via the Lawyers, Judges and Courts within the Commonwealth of Australia – The most recent Commonwealth election was a Corporation election; at no time was it a Constitutional election.

The principal reason for saying this is in the fact that in the period 2003/2004 the State of Western Australia removed the Constitutional Monarch Queen Elizabeth the Second from Law within Western Australia by the enactment on 1st January 2004 of the Overt Act titled “Acts Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA)”, in particular Parts 5 & 8 of such Act The Constitutional effect of such Act meant that the State of Western Australia could not vote nor participate in a Commonwealth election under the Crown after the removal of the Crown – The State of Western Australia did participate in the voting process, but, at no time was the actual truth revealed to the voting electorate in either Western Australia or the Commonwealth.

This is the Fraud of the Election.
Western Australia was permitted to vote, because the election was held “Under the Corporation” not “Under the Constitution” All Supreme Courts inclusive of the High Court of Australia are under “The City of London Orders” to ensure that the transition from the Constitution into the Corporation occurs without any legal hindrance to the fraudulent agenda Under the Corporation structure the actual Chattels of the Corporation are the People and resources of Australia – Under a correct and valid Constitution the people can control and monitor Government Fraud When uncovering the Corporation of the City of London the following entities come
into the discovery
1. International Freemasonry
2. International Socialism
3. Fabian Socialism
4. The Bank of England
5. The European Union
6. The United Nations
The undeclared international agenda is to turn Commonwealth Countries into Republics chartered to the United Nations under Socialism and Secularism.
Over a large number of years England has moved from Roman law to Protestantism to Socialism and as such Almighty God is excluded in Socialism and Secularism
When Western Australia removed the Crown, they excluded Almighty God and
embraced both Socialism and Secularism and at the same time aborted the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia and traded themselves into the secret world of the Corporation of the City of London In simple terms they trapped themselves in a very well laid trap By voting in a fraudulent election they traded their Souls from a Constitutional Protection into a Corporation Deception in simple terms “Self Imploded” The President of the Liberal party of Western Australia is Barry Court, son of Sir Charles Court former Premier, in 1978 Sir Charles Court revamped Section 73 of the Western Australia Constitution to block or prevent a Labor Party attempt to gain a Socialist Republic by stealth
Western Australia Constitution
Section 73.2(g)
(2) A Bill that —
(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in
accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its
presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
This section sending certain Bills to State referendum debate and consent was not
abided by for The Australia Act Request Act 1984/1985, The Australia Act 1986 nor the “Acts Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA)”,
Western Australia has broken the law of their own Constitution and the law of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia and as such all Political Parties has broken the law to transfer all Australians into “The Corporation”
This is the reason for the header of this article “The Fraudulent Election”
http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal.htm “The Brief of Evidence”
U-Tube: http://www.youtube.com/user/elijahschallenge
Face Book: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=137427046300264

=================================

ALL AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS ARE A CARETAKER FOR THE UN; HERE’S THE REGO NUMBERS – This is Treason. And it is by this transition into corporations, they have avoided proper legal challenge BY also changing the ‘Allegience’ for all Judiciary to uphold ‘NOT TO THE QUEEN’ but to the Corporation Terms. . And the IMF pays their salaries. ==========

“In the December 8 2009 writ the applicants demand that the executive government of Australia ‘cease all operations that are carried out under the Commonwealth of Australia ABN 122 104 616 and registered with the United States American Securities and Exchange Commission :”

No. 000 080 5157 and further command them to dissolve their subsidiary companies being;
The State of New South Wales ABN 066561153
The State of Victoria ABN 054558619
The State of Queensland ABN 066 102930
The State of South Australia ABN 050208921
The State of Western Australia ABN 072526008
The State of Tasmania ABN 053201308
The Trustees of Northern Territory Government ABN 09059854’

===================================

Prepared by Brian Shaw

Page 1 of 4
The Fraud of the Australia Act
In submitting the article I will make it very clear at the beginning what the difference isbetween the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Corporation of the Commonwealth of Australia
The Constitution was granted to the people by Queen Victoria
The Corporation is the ruling entity that owns, runs and controls the City of London
which is not subject to nor under any law of the Monarch of England
This is the First Fraud Prior to Federation in 1900 Australia was divided into Colonies, after Federation the Colonies became States, but, each State was subject to the Constitution Prior to the Australia Act any bill either State or Commonwealth touching a Constitutional issue had to be reserved for Royal Assent involving the Two Houses of Parliament back in England in the process By 1984 the International Socialist movement specifically the Fabian Socialist had
succeeded in getting Mr R Hawke elected as Prime Minster of Australia

The Second Fraud
Page 2 of 4
In a 1996 Senate Standing Committee paper titled “Aspects of Section 44” Professor
Blackshield submitted a paper to the committee which stated that Mr Hawke may havea case to answer in relation to Section 44 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900in that at the time of being Prime Minister Mr Hawke was also a Honorary Citizen of Israel
The Third Fraud
Prior to the actual enactment of the Australia Act 1986 new “Letters Patent” were
issued, it appears that the signature to the new Letters Patent signed at Balmoral in
Scotland in 1984 was Mr R Hawke
The Fourth Fraud
To avoid having to send the Australia Act to a Constitutional referendum Mr Hawke
and the Six Premiers involved decided to use section 51 (xxxviii) of the Commonwealth Constitution
The Fifth Fraud
By using Section 51 not Section 128 this activated State Request Acts and as such under their State Constitutions, Elector approval had to be sought prior to any Royal Assent being granted
The Sixth Fraud
Page 3 of 4
In Western Australia, section 73 of their State Constitution
(2) A Bill that —
(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of
this Act, namely — sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51 and 73, shall not be presented for
assent by or in the name of the Queen unless —
(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in
accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its
presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
In Queensland, section 53 of their State Constitution
53.(1) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or
alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any
way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely— sections
1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent
by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the
electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to
consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection
shall be of no effect as an Act.
In New South Wales, section 7 of their State Constitution
7(a) (2) A Bill for any purpose within subsection (1) shall not be presented to
the Governor for His Majesty’s assent until the Bill has been approved by the
electors in accordance with this section.
7(b) shall not be presented to the Governor for Her Majesty’s assent until the
Bill has been approved by the electors in accordance with this section.
The Seventh Fraud
Page 4 of 4
Within the Australia Act 1986 section 14 amends the Western Australian Constitution
by amending section 50 and 51, but, these particular sections are bound to elector
consent and approval at section 73 of the Western Australia Constitution
The Eighth Fraud
Within the Australia Act 1986 section 13 amends the Queensland Constitution by
amending section 11A and 11B, but, these particular sections are bound to elector
consent and approval at section 53 of the Queensland Constitution
The Ninth Fraud
After the purported enactment of the Australia Act 1986 “Reservation of Bills” for
Royal Assent stopped and Royal Assent to Constitutional amendments operated within Australia after 1986 without any knowledge of the electorate, that “Primary Fraud” had occurred in relation to The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia as opposed to the Corporation of the Commonwealth of Australia operating via the Corporation of the City of London
http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal.htm “The Brief of Evidence”
U-Tube: http://www.youtube.com/user/elijahschallenge
Face Book: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=137427046300264

THINGS YOU MUST KNOW :Below:

======================================

ABOUT OUR AUSTRALIA’S CONSTITUTION AND LAWS:

Hi Chris from James Dean- Article revamped by Chris.

The whole point of a democracy is that the people are in control of the Common-wealth which they own collectively. In this case, this is the Commonwealth of Australia.

We, the People, do not vote our political representatives into power because we, the People, always have the power. Our political representatives are voted into positions of responsibility to maintain the laws which we, the People, vote on via referendum as part of the enactment process. For decades politicians have hoodwinked the People into believing they and only they have the power to enact laws using a governor general which they choose.

The highest man-made law in Australia is the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and it is by this Constitution under section 51 that allows our political representatives to make laws “subject to the Constitution” and this includes the process outlined in section 128 if these political laws are subject to the Constitution.

If our greatest man-made law in Australia (the Constitution) cannot be enacted or amended without a vote of the people then because all laws are subject to the Common-wealth Constitution, all laws must be passed in the same way and that is by the people.

The constitution is binding on all Judges, courts and people of every State, notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State so no high court can usurp the authority of the referendum of the people of Australia and in 1988 the people of every State once again reiterated their wish not to recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT’s and so therefore LOCAL GOVERNMENT’s are invalid under section 109 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 regardless of the State LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995 which automatically became invalid the day it was supposedly enacted.

Inconsistency of Laws

“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”> – COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 109

The people decided in 1988 not to recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT in their Commonwealth Constitution referendum, so the only reason for their existence is to support State Governments for the shortfall funding each year via the Federal consolidated funds.

The question put at the referendum was, “The Constitution recognises Government at Federal and State levels, but makes no mention of local government. Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988 proposed to alter the constitution so as to recognise local government.”
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_referendum,_1988_(Local_Government)

The proposal was refuted by the people at the 1988 referendum.

Improper Collection and Use Of Local Council Rates

Due to a range of UN treaties and agreements, hard working Australians have their taxes sent overseas in foreign aid, to the known tune of $4.5 billion dollars, by the Commonwealth government without even being asked permission to do so by their representative parliamentarians and, at the same time, are taxed again by unconstitutional taxes in the form of Local Council ‘RATES’ on freehold land which was originally purchased from the Commonwealth pool of land and became “alienated land” recognised under the LAND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1997.

It is interesting that the LAND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1997 also became unconstitutional under the Commonwealth Constitution because it offends section 51.2 or (ii) which states,

” (ii) taxation; but so as not to discriminate between States or parts of States;”

and by giving the State Minister the right to Tax freehold land and section 81 which says;

“COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 81

Consolidated Revenue Fund

All revenues or moneys raised or received by the Executive Government of the Commonwealth shall form one Consolidated Revenue Fund, to be appropriated for the purposes of the Commonwealth in the manner and subject to the charges and liabilities imposed by this Constitution.”

The above section says that there shall be one consolidated fund for the purposes of the Commonwealth. Where does it say we give $4.5 billion dollars in foreign Aid and at the same time borrow billions from the IMF at bloated interest rates? We the people did not say this in our Commonwealth Constitution.

Clause 5 of the Constitution reads as follows:

“COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – CLAUSE 5 Operation of the Constitution and laws [see Note 3]

This Act, and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution, shall be binding on the courts, judges, and people of every State and of every part of the Commonwealth, notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State; and the laws of the Commonwealth shall be in force on all British ships, the Queen’s ships of war excepted, whose first port of clearance and whose port of destination are in the Commonwealth.”

Under section 106 all State Constitutions come under the Commonwealth Constitution.

“COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 106

Saving of Constitutions
The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State.”

So if each State Constitution is “subject to the Commonwealth Constitution” and the Commonwealth Constitution does not recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT then no State Constitution can continue to or recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

On 1st January 2004 the Attorney General of Western Australia Mr. J McGinty in agreement with the then Governor Mr. Sanderson enacted an Act titled “Acts Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA)”.

The purpose of the Bill/Act was to remove the Crown and Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth ll Her Heirs and Successors and Subjects from specific law within Western Australia. This was in full breach of the 1999 Commonwealth referendum result. Therefore, as this Bill/Act did not go to any referendum authorizing this legislation – it is invalid legislation.

“CONSTITUTION ACT 1889 – SECT 2

2 . Legislature to be constituted in Western Australia

(1) There shall be, in place of the Legislative Council now subsisting, a Legislative Council and a Legislative Assembly: and it shall be lawful for Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the said Council and Assembly, to make laws for the peace, order, and good Government of the Colony of Western Australia and its Dependencies: and such Council and Assembly shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, have all the powers and functions of the now subsisting Legislative Council.

(2) The Parliament of Western Australia consists of the Queen and the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly.

(3) Every Bill, after its passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, shall, subject to section 73, be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of the Queen and shall be of no effect unless it has been duly assented to by or in the name of the Queen.

CONSTITUTION ACT 1889 – SECT 73

73 . Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions

(1) Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, the Legislature of the Colony shall have full power and authority, from time to time, by any Act, to repeal or alter any of the provisions of this Act. Provided always, that it shall not be lawful to present to the Governor for Her Majesty’s assent any Bill by which any change in the Constitution of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly shall be effected, unless the second and third readings of such Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly respectively. Provided also, that every Bill which shall be so passed for the election of a Legislative Council at any date earlier than by Part III provided, and every Bill which shall interfere with the operation of sections 69, 70, 71, or 72, or of Schedules B, C, or D, or of this section, shall be reserved by the Governor for the signification of Her Majesty’s pleasure thereon 10, 11 .

(2) A Bill that —

(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or

(b) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or

(c) expressly or impliedly provides that the Legislative Council or the Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members other than members chosen directly by the people; or

(d) expressly or impliedly provides for a reduction in the numbers of the members of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or

(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51 and 73,

shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless

(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and

(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section,

and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.

(3) On a day fixed by the Governor by Order in Council, being a day not sooner than 2 months, and not later than 6 months, after the passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2), the question for the approval or otherwise of the Bill shall be submitted to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly according to the provisions of the Electoral Act 1907 .

(4) When the Bill is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as is fixed by law.

(5) If a majority of the electors voting approve the Bill, it shall be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of the Queen.

(6) Any person entitled to vote at a general election of members of the Legislative Assembly is entitled to bring proceedings in the Supreme Court for a declaration, injunction or other remedy to enforce the provisions of this section either before or after a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2) is presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen.”

Jim McGinty is way out on a treasonous limb by removing the Queen who wears the peoples Crown of authority from the West Australian Government. As a matter of interest the Crown was taken from the despotic King John in the year 1215 at the signing of the Magna Charta.

Dennis McLeod is making millions of dollars out of local councils who are unconstitutionally controlled by the equally unconstitutional LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995.

There is a lot more to this matter than a few cleaver words from either McGinty or McLeod (and who Mr Winderstorm is, I have no idea) but he sound like another one banging the drum of antidemocratic process.