RSS Feed
July 25th, 2021 
Awake Goy 
The Holocaust as Sacred Myth and Ideology
Final Reflections in the Wake of the Iran Holocaust Conference
by Paul Grubach
Published: 2007-01-01
Note: article edited for brevity
I. The Specter
II. The Weakness of the Holocaust Doctrine
III. Media Responses
IV. The Holocaust as Sacred Myth
V. The Holocaust Ideology and Israel
VI. The Holocaust Ideology and Marxist Theory
VII. The Holocaust Ideology and jewish Identity
VIII. Closing Statement: What is to be done?
I. The Specter
A specter is haunting Western Civilization. It is the specter of holocaust revisionism. The jewish power elites of Europe, the United States and beyond have entered into holy alliance to exorcise this specter: Pederast Pope and US President, British and Canadian Prime Minister, French and Russian Foreign Ministers, German Chancellor and Justice Minister, international zionism and the Western mass media. The list goes on and on.
In December of 2006, a watershed event took place in the history of holocaust revisionism, the historical discipline that states there was no NAZI plan to exterminate “Europe’s” parasitic jews, the “NAZI Gas Chambers” never existed, and the number of jews killed during WWJ is grossly exaggerated. On December 11 and 12, 2006, the Islamic Republic of Iran hosted an international conference during which different viewpoints about the holocaust and the issues that surround it were presented.
One of the very few, evenhanded descriptions of the conference was put forth by an unlikely source, the influential business and finance publication, Investor’s Business Daily. “The avowed enemy of israel,” they rightly pointed out, “hosted a two-day conference for holocaust skeptics, at which attendees expressed doubts that the NAZIS exterminated 6 million jews during World War II.”[1] It is important to add there were speakers and attendees that accepted the traditional view of the holocaust. This was the first time in history, however, that a sovereign government hosted a conference in which holocaust revisionist viewpoints were welcomed.
In general, jewish world reaction was both swift and highly negative. Jewish leaders in Washington, London, Berlin, Paris, Ottawa, Moscow and numerous other jewish capitols put forth harshly worded jewish condemnations. A Dec. 13, 2006 Yajoo news missive stated: “israel spearheaded the international outcry over the meeting.”[2] Indeed, the ensuing international reaction unfolded like the outcome of a secret plan formulated in the inner sanctums of the israeli Knesset.
According to jewish news sources, the highest echelon of the degenerate child raping Catholic Church, the Vatican, called “the holocaust an ‘immense tragedy’ for all humanity, in a statement admitting of no doubt that the mass murder took place.”[3] The White House said in a press statement on Dec. 11 that the holocaust gathering in Iran is an “affront to the entire civilized world, as well as the traditional Iranian values of tolerance and mutual respect.”[4]
In London, Prime Minister jew stooge Tony Blair called the Iranian conference “shocking beyond belief.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed outrage: “I would like to make clear that we reject with all our strength the conference taking place in Iran about the supposed nonexistence of the holocaust.” Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper alleged that “the conference hosted by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with the sole purpose of denying the holocaust is an offence to all Canadians.” French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy complained that “The conference represents a resurgence of ‘revisionist’ theories which are quite simply not acceptable.” The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a declaration, saying that “Russia shares the determination of the UN general assembly not to allow the denial of the holocaust.”[5]
Here, the international jewish holocaust lobby made a mass “appeal to authority.” The jews prodded numerous governments to make these public condemnations because they know full well that large numbers of people will blindly believe the claim—”The holocaust happened”–if people in positions of authority say it is “true,” irregardless of how flimsy and weak the evidence for the jewish holocaust doctrine may be. As a matter of fact, it is a very easy task to show how questionable the traditional jewish view of the holocaust really is.[6]
II. The Weakness of the Holocaust Doctrine
Expressing the etched-in-stone official truth, the Jew York Times declared: “The two day-meeting included no attempt to come to terms with the nature of the well-documented NAZI slaughter, offering only a platform to those pursuing the fantasy that it never happened.”[7]
This is false on two counts. First, there were speakers who accepted the traditional view of the holocaust, and disputed the revisionist viewpoint. For example, a December 13, 2006, article in their own newspaper (!) pointed out that an Iranian scholar insisted that certain aspects of the holocaust are well documented.[8]
Second, it is very easy to show that the alleged jewish holocaust is not well-documented. To put it mildly, it is based upon highly questionable jewish speculations. Consider just a very small sample of the evidence a revisionist could muster. These are not even the best jewish examples, just the simplest to explain in a short amount of space.
Holocaust historian Leon Poliakov pointed out decades ago that there are no documents to prove that the NAZIS ever had any plan to exterminate the jews of Europe: “[T]he campaign to exterminate the jews, as regards its conception as well as many other essential aspects, remains shrouded in darkness. Inferences, psychological considerations, and third- or fourth-hand reports enable us to reconstruct its development with considerable accuracy. Certain details, however, must remain forever unknown. The three or four people chiefly involved in the actual drawing up of the plan for total extermination are dead and no documents have survived; perhaps none ever existed.”[9]
In short, the jewish “evidence” that “proves” the existence of an alleged NAZI plan to exterminate the jews is simply the guesswork of Holocaust historians. Hard documentary proof is missing.
One of the foremost holocaust historians, filthy lying jew Raul Hilberg, admitted that scientific proof for the existence of the “Hitler gas chambers” is missing. No authentic and genuine autopsy report exists to show that jews were killed with poison gas. No one has ever produced any photographs of jews being gassed.[10]
As the late Jean-Claude Pressac (widely considered to be an authority on the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers) was forced to admit, in the blueprints, construction documents and work orders that trace the construction and subsequent use of the buildings that allegedly housed the “Auschwitz gas chambers,” there is no explicit reference to the use of gas chambers or Zyklon B for homicidal purposes.[11]
Holocaust historian Robert Jan van Pelt conceded that the “evidence” for the mass killings of jews at Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec—where allegedly millions were murdered–is sparse at best. In reference to these three camps, he wrote: “There are few eyewitnesses, no confession that can compare to that given by [Auschwitz commandant Rudolf] Hoss, no significant remains, and few archival sources.”[12]
Dr. van Pelt also admits that the wartime claims that jews were electrocuted en masse in “electrocution chambers” at Belzec and on “electric conveyor belts” at Auschwitz are also falsehoods.[13] If the evidence that “proves” that jews were electrocuted en masse is bogus, isn’t it also possible that the “evidence” that “proves” that jews were murdered in “gas chambers” is also bogus, or at least very suspect?
Holocaust jew historian Deborah Lipstadt conceded that the story that the NAZIS made soap from jewish corpses is apparently another war time falsehood. She also pointed to evidence that leads one to believe that the eyewitness testimony that forms most of the “proof” of the traditional view of the Holocaust is unreliable.[14]
Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer admitted that the formerly “etched-in-stone-fact” that four million souls were murdered by the NAZIS at Auschwitz was a deliberate myth created to serve an ulterior political agenda. This shows that conspiracy (premeditated distortions introduced for political ends) was involved in the shaping of the Holocaust doctrine.[15]
The list of highly questionable claims, falsehoods, contradictions, and absurdities in the traditional Holocaust doctrine is seemingly endless.[16]
III. Media Responses
Condemnations of the conference coming from jewish mainstream media sources in the West were similar to jewish government condemnations. The editorial that appeared in Forward, perhaps the US’s most important jewish newspaper, was typical. Entitled “The Conclave of Hate,” it stated; “[T]he Iranian regime may have done the world a favor when it decided to host this week’s international gathering of holocaust deniers. By rolling out the red carpet for the ugliest gathering in recent memory of frauds, nutballs, white racists and unreconstructed NAZIS from every dark corner of the world, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his bully boys have made plainer than ever the sort of people they are. Their bizarre festival of hate has driven home to the world community, in a way that nothing else could do, just who it is that sits in Tehran and schemes to build a nuclear bomb.”[17]
The pattern of jewish run Western news accounts and jewish editorials about the conference were remarkably similar. They simply condemned those who attended with derogatory epithets. The jews stated that the traditional view of the jewish holocaust is an indisputable fact. The jews refused to fairly examine the alternative viewpoint, the case for holocaust revisionism. And finally, the jews promoted outright lies about the conference. These are stock-in-trade jewish tactics as to how mainstream jewish Western news sources deal with holocaust revisionism, and as we shall see, are comparable to the jewish propaganda techniques used by jewish totalitarian regimes to control the thinking of the masses. Only on rare occasions were there fair and honest reports and blurbs about the Iranian meeting.
IV. The Holocaust as Sacred Myth
At the postwar jewish Nuremberg Tribunal, the judeo-Allies alleged that the Germans exterminated four million people at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Until 1990, a memorial plaque at Auschwitz read: ‘Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the NAZI Murderers Between the Years 1940 and 1945.’”[52] During a June 1979 visit to the camp, pederast Pope John Paul II stood before this memorial and prayed for and blessed the four million victims.[53]
In July 1990, the Polish government’s Auschwitz State Museum, along with israel’s Yad Vashem holocaust center, conceded that the four million figure was a gross exaggeration, and references to it were accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish officials announced a tentative revised toll of at least 1.1 million dead, about 90 percent being jews from almost every country in Europe.[54]
As previously noted, the claim that the Germans exterminated four million people at Auschwitz is now admitted to be a deliberate myth and a politically inspired falsehood.[55]
In his speech at the conference, Revisionist diplomat Dr. Frederick Toben rightly pointed out that, once again, pederast John Paul’s successor, pederast Pope Benedict XVI, blessed the alleged 1.5 million victims, which shows that there is indeed a concerted effort to elevate the holocaust ideology to the status of “sacred myth.”[56]
In a political sense, here is how “myth” is defined: “Any false belief that is (a) of symbolic importance in the emotional life of the believer, (b) based in a need to believe rather than in rational conviction, (c) associated with stories that are accepted not as history (or not on historical evidence), but as illustrations or parables, (d) endowed with a ‘sacred’ quality, which it can confer on the social relations, institutions or political arrangements associated with it, so granting them an air of legitimacy.”[57]
In regard to the politically jewish inspired falsehood that four million people were murdered at Auschwitz, here is how the late pederast Pope John Paul II proposed it is to be used. In the words of the Jew York Times: “His voice going hoarse on the sixth day of the visit to his native Poland, the christinsane Pope asked that all his listeners commit themselves to the care of human beings and the oppressed, in testimony for the four million—including two and a half million jews—who died in the camps he could see from the raised altar platform.”[58]
Notice how the false “four million murdered” figure fits the criteria for “myth.” It is a demonstrably false belief that had taken on a symbolic importance in the emotional life of people. The jew stooge child raping Pope proposed that it should be a motivating force for social action. The four million figure was not based in rational analysis, but rather in a “need to believe” for an ulterior political reason. And finally, the four million falsehood was endowed by the child rapist Pope himself with a ‘sacred’ quality, which it can confer on the social relations, institutions or political arrangements associated with it, so granting them an air of legitimacy.
To the Time’s credit, they did point out how the holocaust ideology, inclusive of the four million falsehood, granted an air of legitimacy to the political arrangements in the year of 1979: “[P]oland’s suffering at the hands of NAZI Germany is still viewed as a source of unity, and the country’s liberation by the judeo-Red Army is regarded as the imprint of the legitimacy of the country’s marxist leadership.”[59]
The “four million murdered at Auschwitz” figure is gone, and Poland’s marxist leadership has been consigned to the dustbin of history. But the need to believe in the Auschwitz mythos survives. It has been “revised” to lend an air of legitimacy to contemporary socio political interests.
Professor van Pelt revealed reasons why Poland has a vested interest in promoting the jewish holocaust ideology. In 1947, the Polish government enacted a law that commemorated the martyrdom of Poland and other nations at the Auschwitz concentration camp.[60] Elsewhere, he wrote: “As relations between the East and West deteriorated after the war, with the largest part of Germany becoming part of NATO and with that country refusing to recognize the legitimacy of postwar Polish annexation of the former German territories of East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia, the number of victims became a political issue. The judeo-communist rulers of Poland were unwilling to give an inch on their claims against Germany as long as the Bonn government did not recognize the territorial integrity of the People’s Republic of Poland, and therefore they continued to maintain, as a matter of policy, that 4 million people had been killed in Auschwitz.”[61]
Whether or not the Polish position vis-à-vis the disputed territories is legitimate or not, Polish authorities still have an ulterior vested interest in promoting the holocaust ideology. Not only does it serve as a cornerstone of Polish nationalism, but it provides a “safeguard” against any future German demand that Poland give back the disputed territories to Germany. Imprisoned holocaust revisionist scientist Germar Rudolf summed it up perfectly when he wrote; “Many Poles fear in their hearts that the post-war state of Poland stands and falls with Auschwitz.”[62]
Surely, there are also non-jewish interests and governments behind the promotion of the holocaust ideology. The late revisionist historian, Charles Weber, stated it thusly: “As corrosive, divisive and destructive as the ‘holocaust’ material and extermination thesis are, we must certainly not consider jews exclusively responsible for their continued propagation,”[63] though they are the driving force behind it.
Consider the case of Russia. Here is the statement of the Russian representative to the Jewnited Nations in regard to the recent Jewnited Nations Resolution condemning “Holocaust denial: “[T]he Red Army had freed the Auschwitz death camp, one of the largest. The memory of the heroism of the Soviet soldiers and the many millions of victims in his country could never reconcile itself with those of ‘opportunistic political interest’ who sought to distort the significance of that history.”[64]
Clearly, the jewish holocaust ideology casts the Russian people in the role of “heroic liberators.” Any repudiation of the doctrine would very well shine the spotlight on the crimes, genocide and oppression of the judeo-Stalinist regime, with the end result being the demolition of a pillar of Russian patriotic ideology, and the world-wide realization that Stalinist judeo-Communism that came from Russia was a more oppressive and evil system than NAZISM even remotely ever was. Even the bitter intellectual opponent of holocaust revisionism, filthy jew Deborah Lipstadt, admits that Stalin killed more people than Hitler ever did, [65] despite the fact in a sense he didn’t really kill anyone.
Once again, Revisionist Charles Weber stated it thusly: “The ‘holocaust’ material has proved to be a useful supplement in a number of other judeo-Soviet propaganda efforts, including the Nuremberg ‘trials’ and the obliterating by contrast of the awareness of many crimes of the Soviet Union against other nations, such as the Katyn massacres.”[66]
UN Russian Federation representative Vitaly Churkin hinted that this is what is behind Russia’s support of the recent United Nations Resolution condemning “Holocaust denial”: “[M]ember States were bound to include in that condemnation attempts to revise the history of the Second World War and the merits of those who took up arms to fight the NAZIS. Any attempt to make heroic the henchmen of fascism must be rejected.”[67]
Non-jewish American and British shabbos goy power elites also have a vested interest in promoting the holocaust ideology. As historian Jeffrey Herf recently revealed in his study, The Jewish Enemy, the holocaust ideology paints the American and British in a good and ethical light, and thus “justifies” their entire war effort against Germany.
As Herf makes clear, one of the important characteristics of mass propaganda is that it appeals to stark contrasts between good and evil. The holocaust doctrine fills the bill perfectly. He wrote: “Reports of the Final Solution [the NAZI attempt to exterminate the jews during WWII] underscored the stark moral dichotomy between NAZI Germany and its allies, on the one hand, and the United Nations [Americans, British, etc.,] on the other. They reinforced the judeo-Allies’ conviction that this was a war between freedom and tyranny, good and evil, civilization and barbarism.”[68]
In a formal declaration reflecting the official view of the Jewnited States government, it was stated: “The 1945 defeat of NAZI Germany by the U.S. and its judeo-allies finally put a stop to dictator Adolph Hitler’s campaign of genocide.”[69]
In a word, take away the jewish holocaust ideology and one important “justification” of the judeo-American and judeo-British war effort against Germany is consigned to the dustbin of history. Americans and Britons will start asking uncomfortable questions, such as: why did we go to war with Germany? Maybe we should not have gone to war with Germany, and maybe it was a huge error to be allied with the murderous judeo-Stalinist regime?
V. The Holocaust Ideology and israel
The greatest beneficiary of the jewish holocaust ideology is undoubtedly the bandit state of israel and the power elites that ardently support political zionism. As was revealed in the February 4, 2005 issue of The Jerusalem Post, the holocaust doctrine forms the ideological foundation of israel: “The tragedy of the holocaust was a major impetus in the reestablishment of the jewish people’s home, in its ancient land, noted [Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan] Shalom in [a speech to the United Nations].”[70]
In May of 2003, expressing a cornerstone of American foreign policy, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice told Israel’s daily Yediot Aharonot that the “security of israel is the key to the security of the world.”[71]
If the security of israel is the key to the security of the world, and since the jewish holocaust ideology is upholding israel, then it follows that by upholding the holocaust ideology you are upholding the security of the world. By discrediting the holocaust ideology, you are threatening the security of the world—so thinks the pro-zionist wing of the American National Security establishment. This is most certainly one reason why the US government put forth a formal declaration condemning holocaust revisionism.[72]
At the date of this writing, the US and/or israel are on the verge of carrying out a military strike against Iran. Here is how the Forward, the US’s most important jewish newspaper, described the situation: “The looming war against Iran is a different story. This time, Jerusalem’s role is not fantasy. Israel’s sense of alarm has been at the center of the story from the get-go. Both the Washington Post and the Jew Yorker reported this week that Israeli strategists and intelligence experts were playing a serious role in building support for war. President Bush himself said in Cleveland last month that israel’s safety was a central concern, if not the main one, in assessing the Iranian threat.”[73]
If there is a military strike against Iran, one can predict that the Holocaust ideology will be used to “justify” it. After all, the US and Israel have to prevent “another Holocaust.”
VI. The Holocaust Ideology and Marxist Theory
What historian Jeffrey Herf reveals in his study is no surprise. The holocaust ideology “justifies” and “legitimizes” the massive restitution payments that go to israel from Germany.
“From 1953 to 1965,” Herf points out, “…the Federal Republic delivered to the state of Israel goods such as ships, machine tools, trains, autos, medical equipment, and telephone technology that were crucial for the construction of infrastructure. The West German deliveries amounted to between 10 and 15 percent of annual israeli imports.”[74]
What is interesting here is that this financial relationship between Germany and israel serves as an example of the marxist theory of economic exploitation.
Political philosopher Roger Scruton explains the function of “ideology” in marxist theories: “[I]deology’ denotes any set of ideas and values which has the social function of consolidating a particular economic order, and which is explained by that fact alone, and not by its inherent truth or reasonableness…Ideology wins support for class rule, by persuading oppressed classes to accept the description of reality which render their subordination ‘natural.’ It therefore has three principal functions: to legitimate, to mystify, and to console.”[75]
The contradictions, absurdities, and outright falsities in the jewish holocaust ideology are legion.[76] The promotion of the jewish holocaust ideology in Germany is not be explained because of its inherent truth or reasonableness. Rather, its dominance is largely explained by the fact that it serves to “justify” and “legitimate” the exploitative jewish economic relationship, imposed upon a prostrate Germany by the victorious judeo-Allies, between the israeli and German people. The jewish holocaust ideology “persuades” the German masses that their financial subordination to israel is “wholly morally correct and natural.”
Yet, the jewish holocaust doctrine and the sociopolitical status quo that it “justifies” contain with it the seeds of its own destruction. The more the German national identity is assaulted with jewish holocaust falsehoods, the more the German people are financially exploited by this, so to will more and more Germans come to reject the jewish holocaust doctrine and the sociopolitical order that is associated with it.
If the current German rulers are truly interesting in building a stable democratic society, they would allow freedom of debate on the holocaust issue, and attempt to get at the whole truth. Basing political systems upon demonstrable jewish falsehoods that degrade and exploit the German people makes for a very politically unstable and volatile situation.[77]
VII. The Holocaust Ideology and jewish Identity
The jewish holocaust doctrine is part and parcel of the entire ideological package that forms jewish identity, and holocaust revisionism is perceived as a grave threat to this identity.
Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt perceives holocaust revisionism as an evil assault upon the jewish self-image and identity. In a frank and honest discussion, he admitted that when he read holocaust revisionist literature, he “had come face to face with a dangerous personal abyss.” His implicit conclusion is that this is one of the main reasons why holocaust revisionism should be attacked and destroyed.[78]
Professor van Pelt then quotes jewish writer Erika Apfelbaum as to why holocaust revisionism is “so evil” and why it should be attacked and refuted. She stated: “Current jewish history is deeply rooted in Auschwitz as the general symbol of the destruction of the jewish people during the holocaust. For someone whose past is rooted in Auschwitz, the experience of reading through the revisionists’ tortured logic and documentation is similar to the psychologically disorienting experience of sensory deprivation experiments or solitary confinement in prison, where one loses touch with reality. The insidious effect of reading this [holocaust revisionist] literature is to lose one’s identity as a survivor and, more generally, as a jew. Therefore, the revisionist allegations serve to dispossess the jews from their history and in doing so, in seeking to destroy a people’s history, a symbolic genocide replaces a physical one.”[79]
Eventually, the world jewish community is going to have to face up to the lies and exaggerations in the holocaust story, and rebuild their religious/ethnic identity on something other than holocaust falsehoods. This will be a major major challenge for the future of jewry.
VIII. Closing Statement: What is to be done?
The jewish holocaust ideology plays an enormous political, social and economic role in world affairs. It is as if the whole emotional, intellectual, and institutional set-up of the post World War Jew world has been built around it. It serves as an ideological “justification” for the sociopolitical arrangements in many parts of the world today. Despite the fact that it is a demonstrably weak and flimsy ideology, it has amazing resiliency. The reason for this is plain to see. There are powerful jewish and non-jewish interests behind it.
One of the best demonstrations of the jewish holocaust doctrine’s weakness is the fact that it is surrounded with strictly enforced taboos, prison sentences, and threats of career destruction to protect it from rational criticism. This alone should tell people how weak and flimsy it really is. A belief that rests on good reason and solid evidence does not need legal restrictions and extra-legal, underhanded tactics to protect it.
The world sociopolitical status quo that the jewish holocaust ideology “justifies” and “legitimizes” is threatened with collapse. In this world of endless war and violence, it is the duty of the intellectuals and scholars to attempt to come up with peaceful resolutions to the problems humanity faces. It is now up to the powerful jewish and non-jewish interests that are behind the jewish holocaust ideology to engage its opponents, the revisionists, in free and democratic debate so we may get at the truth about the fate of the jews during World War Jew. In this way, we can help to build a more rational and humane world order void of jewish lies.
Notes
© 2007
“Iran Summit Questions Holocaust,” Investor’s Business Daily, 12 December 2006, p. A1.
“Olmert asks pope to call on Christians to protest Holocaust denial,” Yahoo! News, 13 December 2006.
Christine Hauser, “Leaders condemn talks against Holocaust,” The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio), 13 December 2006, p. A 9.
Ibid.
For these and other quotes from world leaders, see the ADL’s web site, “Iran Hosts Anti-Semitic Hatefest in Tehran: Responses from World Leaders.” Online: http://www.adl.org/main_International_Affairs/iran_holocaust_conference.htm?Multi_page_sections=sHeading_4
For example, see Paul Grubach, “Reflections in the Aftermath of the Iran Holocaust Conference: Is the Holocaust an Indisputable Fact as World Leaders Say?” Online: http://www.codoh.com/viewpoints/vppgiran.html
Michael Slackman, Mona el-Naggar, Nazila Fathi, “Deep Roots of Denial for Iran’s True Believer,” The New York Times, 14 December 2006, p. A 3.
Nazila Fathi, “Israel Fading, Iran’s Leader Tells Deniers of Holocaust,” The New York Times, 13 December 2006, p. A 10.
Leon Poliakov, The Harvest of Hate: The Nazi Program for the Destruction of the Jews of Europe (Holocaust Library, 1979), p. 108.
The Sault Star. (Canada), “Scientific evidence of Holocaust missing,” January 18, 1985, p. A11; See Hilberg’s testimony in Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zundel—1988 (Samisdat, 1992), p. 39. Online: http://zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd09hilberg.html Jean-Claude Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers (Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989), p. 429. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0429.htm
Pressac, p. 429. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0429.htm
Robert Jan van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial (Indiana University Press, 2002), p. 5.
Ibid, pp. 145, 159.
Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (The Free Press, 1993), pp. 101, 188.
Yehuda Bauer, “Auschwitz: The Dangers of Distortion,” Jerusalem Post International Edition, week ending September 30, 1989, p. 7; Peter Steinfels, “Auschwitz Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar’s Case,” New York Times, November 12, 1989. Robert Jan van Pelt makes a similar point, p. 109.
For example, see Ernst Gauss, ed., Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory” (Theses and Dissertations Press, 2000).
“The Conclave of Hate,” Forward, December 2006, p. A 12.
Jeffrey Herf, The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006), p. 33.
Nazila Fathi, “Iran Invites Scholars to Assess Holocaust as History or Fiction,” The New York Times, 6 December 2006, p. A. 5.
Nazila Fathi, “Iran Opens Conference on Holocaust,” The New York Times, 12 December 2006, p. A 3.
Michael Collins Piper, “What Really Happened in Iran…” Online: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/iranholocaustconf.php
Ibid.
Online: http://www.davidduke.com/general/live-from-america-and-around-the-worldlisten-to-todays-or-an-earlier-webcast-of-david-duke-live-internet-radio-broadcast-live-every-weekday-sunday-e-mail-or-post-your-questions-to-rep-duke_1333.html#more-1333 Scroll down to David Duke’s Monday, December 11, 2006 broadcast, “Duke Speaks at Holocaust Conference.”
Nazila Fathi, “Israel Fading, Iran’s Leader Tells Deniers of Holocaust,” The New York Times, 13 December 2006, p. A 10.
Piper.
Robert Faurisson, “The Victories of Revisionism.” Online: http://www.codoh.com/viewpoints/vprfvict.html Frederick Toben, “The ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ in Time & Space, not Memory.” Online: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/2006December/contents.htm
“Rogues and Fools,” The New York Times, 15 December 2006, p. A 40.
Online: http://www.juancole.com/2006/05/hitchens-hacker-and-hitchens.html For a short discussion of this with appropriate documentation and links to Juan Coles’s writings, see Online: http://www.fpp. co.uk/Letters/History_07/Persia_220307.html
Christine Hauser, “Leaders condemn talks against Holocaust,” The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio), 13 December 2006, p. A 9.
For example, the Anti-Defamation League promotes this falsehood. See “Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in his Own Words.” Online: http://www.adl.org/main_Anti_Semitism_International/ahmadinejad_words.htm
Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry (Theses & Dissertations Press, 2003), p. 299.
“President reiterates that Holocaust is ‘myth.’ Reuters News release, 14 December 2005.
Hugh J. Schonfeld, The Passover Plot: New Light on the Life and Death of Jesus (Bantam, 1967).
According to the blurbs on the book’s cover, it was discussed in Publishers’ Weekly, Saturday Review, The Queen Magazine, Chicago Tribune, King Features Syndicate, and The Christian Herald.
John M. Allegro, The Sacred Cross and the Mushroom: A Study of the nature and origins of Christianity within the fertility cults of the ancient Near East (Bantam, 1971).
Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman, Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why do they Say it? (University of California Press, 2000).
Dion Nissenbaum, “Experts debunk claims in Jesus Documentary,” The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio), 27 February 2007, p. A 4.
Elaine Sciolino, “Teacher in Hiding After Attack on Islam Stirs Threats,” The New York Times, 30 September 2006, p. A 3.
Ibid.
“French president orders probe into revisionist comments,” European Jewish Press, 25 December 2006. Online: http://www.ejpress.org/article/12289
Roger Scruton, A Dictionary of Political Thought (Harper & Row, 1982), p. 461.
Lipstadt, p. 1.
Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews: Student Edition (Holmes & Meir, 1985), p. 5.
Lipstadt, passim.
Quoted in Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Assassins of Memory: Essays on Denial of the Holocaust (Columbia University Press, 1992), p. xiv.
Marc Perelman, “Iran Proposal for Shoah Rebuffed by Europeans,” Forward, 24 February 2006, p. 7. “Drawing the Line on Iran, ” Forward, 24 February 2006, p. 10.
Ibid.
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 1967 ed., s.v. “Karl Raimund Popper,” by Anthony Quinton.
Kevin MacDonald, A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora Peoples (Writers Club Press, 2002), p. 364.
Ibid, p. 363.
See Mark Weber, “Freedom for Europe’s Prisoners of Conscience!: Irving, Zundel, Rudolf Still in Prison.” Online: http://www.ihr.org/news/061112_prisoners_of_conscience.shtml
Nuremberg document 008-USSR; IMT “blue series,” Vol. 39, pp. 24-25. Yisrael Gutman and Michael Berenbaum, eds., Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp (Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 61-62; Lipstadt, p. 188, footnote.
See photograph at http://zundelsite.org/english/antiprop/plaques/pope.jpg Also, see photograph at Paul Grubach, “The Christian Religion and the Iran Holocaust Conference: An Open Letter to Pope Benedict XVI.” Online: http://www.codoh.com/viewpoints/vppgpope.html
Gutman and Berenbaum. Lipstadt, p. 188, footnote.
See footnote 15.
Frederick Toben, “The ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ in Time & Space, not Memory.” Online: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/2006December/contents.htm
Scruton, p. 311.
John Vinocur, “Pope Prays at Auschwitz: ‘Only Peace!,’” The New York Times, 8 June 1979, p. A1.
Ibid.
van Pelt, p. 14.
Ibid, p. 109.
Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz (Theses & Dissertations Press, 2003), p. 273.
Charles Weber, “Cui Bono? An American veteran’s views on non-Jewish toleration and propagation of the Extermination thesis,” The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1982, vol 3, no 2, p. 105. Online: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p105_Weber.html
General Assembly, GA/10569, 26 January 2007, “General Assembly Adopts Resolution Condemning Any Denial of Holocaust: United States Representative Says to Deny Events of Holocaust Tantamount to Approval of Genocide in All its Forms.” Online: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2007/ga10569.doc.htm
Lipstadt, p. 213.
Weber.
footnote 64.
Herf, p. 176.
VOA News, Editorials Reflecting the Views of the United States Government, “Holocaust Conference in Iran,” 22 December 2006. Online: http://www.voanews.com/uspolicy/2006-12-22-voa5.cfm
Liat Collins, “From the Ashes,” The International Jerusalem Post, 4 February 2005, p. 4.
Avraham Shmuel Lewin, “Rice: Israel’s Security is Key to Security of Rest of World,” jewishpress.com, 14 May 2003. Online: http: //www.jewishpress.com/news_article_print.asp?article=2380
Footnote 69.
“The Risks of War,” Forward, 14 April 2006, p. 10.
Jeffrey Herf, Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys (Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 288.
Scruton, p. 213.
See Gauss.
For a discussion of this, see Paul Grubach, “Should Germany and Austria Tolerate Holocaust Revisionism?: Reflections on the Upcoming Irving, Zundel and Rudolf Trials.” Online: http://www.codoh.com/viewpoints/vppgtolerate.html
van Pelt, p. 70.
Ibid.
Posted in 
Tags: 
