RSS Feed
August 25th, 2011 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda 
Owen Myles
Activist Post
August 24, 2011
A small victory for privacy has been scored by Judge Nicholas Garaufis, who has denied a government request for warrantless access to 113 days of cellphone-location history of a Verizon customer. This certainly is a bold contrast amidst this new epoch of privacy invasions and pitiful excuses.
The Judge’s decision can be viewed here(pdf).
Such a decision deserves both attention and respect when considering the tremendous pressure imposed upon figures in similar positions.
The current administration has been extremely aggressive in efforts to abolish transparency for themselves, while forcing it on the public.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Irrational and even childish excuses of [in]security have been made by those eager to “expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment” – most of which warrant anti-psychotic prescriptions rather than approval.
Whether this brave action on the part of Judge Garaufis will set a precedent for others is yet to be seen.
With the greater majority of US citizens valuing their privacy, and perhaps the Constitution, failure for such a precedent to take hold could mean only one thing – we aren’t mad enough.
See: Stored Communications Act
Bookmark on Delicious- Digg this post
- Recommend on Facebook
- share via Reddit
- Share with Stumblers
- Tweet about it
- Subscribe to the comments on this post
- Print for later
- Bookmark in Browser
- Tell a friend
One Response to “Warrantless Spying, Denied – Judge N. Garaufis”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Posted in 
Tags: 
“The Federal Budget”
“THE BUREAU OF FINANCIAL Management Economic Reduction Act.”
The Federal Bureau of Investigations:
Such provisions required:
The US Supreme Court: sessions through the “strict scrutiny,” of the department of financial necessary management and each department expense.
Meaning:
That each individual (per) case study: (cannot exceed limitations) a set given dollar amount; may be with special exceptions allowed by the us department of state revenue, and or within reason of scope the governor review of it’s said jurisdictions.
Special Rules of Exception-
The consideration granted if said upon the US Supreme Court.
Example of Rule:
Class A $100,000
Class B $75,000
Class C $25,000 (thousands per case load) then declared if necessary under ( review ) and penalty of its approved by the court or its said jurisdictions.
(1 through 6)
Crimes and such classifications of terrorism, espionage, heinous and other special considerations applied in such legal definition allowed by statute.
Pg. 1
Financial Budget Defined:
Amount determined upon classification of civil and or criminal action(s) legal intervention.
Case Examples:
Example:
(Class Action) Eg, Civil right’s cases.
Athlete Barry Bonds (The Spent 7.9 million(s) of tax payers’ dollars in expense for the accused steroids case.
That’s a single class action: Conclusion: Finding “Not Guilty.”
The necessary required of STATE regulation of budget expenditures:
(US Constitution Article X- ARS Codes; Checks and Balance(s). The regulation of budget can be controlled by appropriations and in each state’s by representation and of district(s).
The National Average Budget:
Scope of Review: Currently Average $125 Million (Per) State Capital.
The Federal Budget Corrections Mandated: case ratio 1- per 100 (FBI vs Police) *informant actually solved within said budget allowance.
(Criminal Justice Studies)
Quote by Jim Ness (MCC) Renee Lacombe
That Each State Budget:
Alternatives: Local and State Finance.
Each State builds revenue to local, city, county, and state law enforcement, task force, DUI Enforcement and other needed equipment.
(I have) Hereby State or Implied:
Other Special Considerations:
A Statue of Limitation:
Prevention Of Civll Abuse:
That such a requirement of all US CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL MATTERS – and Regulation of a said resolution or satisfied in timely manner.
English Common Law: US ARTICLE, 2, 3, VI *Sect 26 US Article 7, 8, 10, and or all matters to be determined by jury within scope of revised statutes.
Marbury vs. Madison.
Legal Conclusion(s):
“The Fair and Impartial resolved in a “timely manner” and recovery of expenditures of all legal and class civil cases studies. “
Like A Gallon of Milk: Expiration Date- The US ARTICLE 8, 10 expedite due process clause to prevent misrepresentations of claims pending.
That ALL Civil Right suits and other important legislative issues.
Pertaining of all torts, law, and statute, and mandatory hearing before panel review of its said legal appropriations(s).
This Revision Will Provide: That Reducing Costs: The Courts and Legal Processes.
That otherwise:
Without such moderations of these statutes:
Legal Limitations- defined.
It has been continually “proven“to lead to other injury in ongoing gross civil negligence and or avoidance(s) and payment of punitive damages.
To the undue prejudice to act in great excess; of other such abuse, acting under the color of law, that has been known to reoccur without such legal protections of rights as required under all State and US Federal Laws.
ARTICLE 1 US Constitution.
Free speech a right of the people, patrons, and it’s respective citizens.
Very Truly, and Sincerely,
Electronically Signed, ( R) Robert Lane Aiassa, The Republic Of The United States America- and Independence; We The People. 08/24/2011 GWB.