Washington Post Claims ‘Elites’ Should Have ‘Bigger Say’ In Choosing the President

The Washington Post is taking heat over a Tuesday op-ed titled "It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president."

The Washington Post is taking heat over a Tuesday op-ed titled “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.

Julia Azari, the author of the article, argues that the Democrat party’s primary process is too complicated and convoluted, and the process of choosing the nominee should instead be trusted to elite politicians instead.

After outrage ensued, the Post quietly changed the headline to the far less inflammatory “It’s time to switch to preference primaries.

The disturbing article reads: 

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Per Zero Hedge: Instead of primaries in which caucuses are held to pick primary delegates, Azari suggests that the parties should use “preference primaries” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

This would allow the ‘elites’ to choose a nominee based on what the voters want – a strategy Azari admitted is “labor-intensive and a little risky,” according to Breitbart.

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/washington-post-claims-elites-bigger-say-choosing-president/

Related Posts
SOTT FOCUS: Washington in the Time of Domitian

  As you cross the Fourteenth Street Bridge from Arlington into Washington on a sunny spring

Washington Post breaks ranks with other US & UK media, ADMITS polls show Crimeans prefer to be part of Russia

Look, you can make legitimate arguments about international law and the way the process was

Washington Attempts to Intimidate Indonesia Not to Buy Russian Weapons

Correspondents from Bloomberg reported that under pressure from Washington, Indonesia will likely refuse to buy Russian and

Washington state shuts down all restaurants and bars, caps ALL gatherings to no more than 50 people

(Natural News) On Sunday, Washington Governor Jay Inslee made an announcement that

Hits: 10

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes