ARCURI, STARMER, YOSSI, UKRAINE, TRUTH PROJECT, LIEBER

RSS Feed

ARCURI, STARMER, YOSSI, UKRAINE, TRUTH PROJECT, LIEBER

December 23rd, 2021

Awake Goy

Jennifer Arcuri is ‘spouting conspiracy theories about Satanism and vaccines on Twitter and Telegram.’

Boris Johnson’s ‘Ex-Lover’ Has Gone Down a QAnon-Inspired Rabbit Hole

‘Sir Keir Starmer was also filmed having a drinks gathering in a confined space with others. At the end of April this year, he was spotted having beers and food at a location in Durham. Lockdown rules at the time forbade indoor gatherings. #StarmerOut‘

…
Tedros

Untouchables?

‘Over 6000 victims came forward.’

‘of the 5,440 accounts so far analysed: 88 percent described an impact on their mental health, with over a third reporting depression.

‘Just over two thirds did not tell anyone about the sexual abuse at the time it was happening.

’45 percent reported an illness or condition that affects their day-to-day life.

‘One in 10 were talking about an experience of child sexual abuse for the first time when they spoke to the Truth Project’

At the end of that incredible collation of data, will anything actually be done to prosecute those who committed the abuse?

Unknown commented –

Quotes from IICSA Report on Lord Janner:

Institutional responses to allegations of child sexual abuse involving the late Lord Janner of Braunstone QC Investigation Report
Executive Summary

‘Operation Magnolia’ ‘There is no evidence that the police were unduly influenced or placed under improper pressure not to pursue the Lord Janner allegations. The outcome, however, was nonetheless the same as if they had been. The crucial statements of JA-A19 and JA-A6 were ‘brushed under the carpet’.

Operation Dauntless ‘Whilst the decision not to charge Lord Janner was not based on his being given preferential treatment, D/Supt Christopher Thomas and Mr Rock appeared reluctant to progress the investigation. Their decisions were unsound and strategically flawed.’

‘The impact of the Background of the complainants’

‘Complaints of abuse made by children in the care of Leicestershire County Council were not given the attention and respect they deserved.

No effort was expended by the Council to assess what risks they and others may have been exposed to over many years. The Council’s duties towards children in its care did not depend on any outcome of criminal proceedings. The duties of a corporate parent do not evaporate because an alleged perpetrator is not prosecuted.

There is a strong suspicion that complainants were ignored in Operation Magnolia because children who had been in care were distrusted and, despite the efforts of some police officers in Operation Dauntless, there appears to have been little enthusiasm for pursuing enquiries. The advice given by the Crown Prosecution Service did not give rise to any confidence in the decision-making processes.’ How convenient for UK Establishment, eh?

Source