Every reason to doubt the vaccine makers’ reassurances

By Neville Hodgkinson -May 3, 2021

WE HAVE been exposed to many misleading statements aimed at getting as many of us as possible vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus. These have included inflated ways of reporting cases and deaths, unvalidated measures such as enforced mask-wearing to increase fear of contagion, and false assurances from medical authorities and supposed ‘fact-checkers’ about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines.

I have reported previously on an astonishing spike in deaths that occurred alongside an intensive vaccination campaign in Gibraltar, where the small community consequently developed the highest Covid death rate in the world.  We also know that thousands of deaths have been seen in the US, EU and UK in the wake of Covid vaccinations, often immediately after the jab has been administered. 

The manufacturers, leading medical journals and most governments insist these deaths are unrelated to the vaccine. In many instances, the deaths and serious illness have been attributed to coincidental infection with the virus. 

But evidence is mounting that for some, especially the weak and elderly, the vaccine itself is creating or worsening the very illness against which it is supposed to be protective.

This of course would be a disaster for Health Secretary Matt Hancock and his team of advisers, who claimed on Friday that real-world data showing the impact of the vaccines gave them a ‘moment of joy’ over the protection provided. 

Those of you who saw the headlines may have been puzzled over what gave rise to such jubilation. The data released by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) were interpreted as showing that since the start of Britain’s rollout, 99 out of 100 vaccinees who had to go into hospital with Covid symptoms had either become infected just before getting the jab, or too soon afterwards for immunity to develop. Only one in 100 had been inoculated at least three weeks previously.

But as Will Jones has previously reported, a worrying phenomenon which appears consistently in Covid vaccine studies is a spike in purported ‘infections’ which occurs precisely during that three-week period, and usually immediately following the jab. It almost looks as if Sage was desperately trying to find a way to interpret the statistics that would help it avoid facing this reality. 

In Saturday’s Lockdown Sceptics Will Jones described a new study showing, once again, a spike in hospitalisations and deaths post-vaccination – what the authors call ‘an abundance of patients admitted to hospital within seven days of vaccination’. The spike is massive on the day of vaccination and the three days afterwards. 

The researchers raise the possibility that the jab may trigger ‘symptoms likened to Covid-19 symptoms including fever’ in those recently exposed to the virus, though one of the lead authors has also offered a convoluted argument that the spike indicates vaccinated people are assuming they are protected very quickly, and letting their guard down – hardly likely, when they become ill within a day or two of the jab.      

Instead of ‘lazily blaming people for getting themselves infected’, Jones says, scientists and governments should properly investigate what is going on.

He suggests the mechanism may be a depression in immunity caused by a loss of white blood cells post-jab, observed in both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca trials, making the vaccinees more vulnerable to the virus in the short term. 

There is however another possibility, arising from the nature of the vaccine itself. It has not been generally acknowledged that the jab is designed to protect us by provoking our cells into producing the very toxin that makes the virus more dangerous than its predecessors in the coronavirus family. 

This toxin, known as the spike protein, can damage not just the lungs but may also affect organs such the brain, heart and kidneys.  

The reasoning behind administering the jab is that temporary exposure to the toxin may provide long-term protection against becoming ill from the virus. Early indications are that this strategy is working, although it is not at all certain yet to what extent the fall-off in infection rates seen in intensely vaccinated populations is seasonal and related to the waves of infection, or if it is a lasting benefit. 

But there is also a very real possibility, supported by animal experiments as well as by the studies cited above, that the vaccine itself may produce symptoms in vulnerable people which are then attributed to Covid-19. The damage to health may be especially severe in an individual who has been recently or is concurrently infected with the actual virus.

There is therefore every reason to doubt the manufacturers’ assurances that the deaths and injuries seen to be accompanying vaccination, and that in some instances look like and are being attributed to Covid-19, are unrelated to the jabs. 

The situation is serious enough for some doctors and scientists to be calling for a moratorium on further Covid vaccinations until it has been properly investigated.

One of these, Dr Peter Breggin, known as ‘the conscience of psychiatry’ for his decades of efforts to fight misuse of drugs and surgical treatments in mental illness, says voluntary reports of vaccine-related deaths and injuries represent only a small fraction of the true numbers. ‘Physicians are always hesitant to report deaths that might be related to their treatments and many physicians are not even aware that their patients have been vaccinated,’ he writes.

‘We are all living in an oppressive society in which if we refuse vaccinations we will be subjected to social and governmental pressure, as well as extreme fear tactics. 

‘Even worse, many institutions, such as schools and public events, are already announcing that they will not admit individuals who lack vaccine passes. People in the government are warning about vaccine passes being used to control domestic and international travel. Vaccine passports are weapons of social control.

‘I am not against vaccines in principle, but the Covid-19 vaccinations must be stopped. The vaccines are unprecedented in their mechanism, dangerous and very experimental, and the reported deaths are mounting. There is insufficient information for anyone to give informed consent.

‘The tens of millions of people already vaccinated need to be evaluated for both safety and effectiveness, a mammoth task that will take considerable time and effort. When accurate information about the vaccines can be communicated to the public and when citizens are no longer living under such coercive conditions, it may become possible for individuals to make informed, freely-chosen decisions about taking the vaccine. But that is a long way off.’           

Source

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

The maximum upload file size: 28 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded.

*

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes