Jew World Order

RT
September 13, 2011

Amnesty International has called on Libya’s new authorities to prevent human rights abuses. There are allegations of violations committed by both rebels and Colonel Gaddafi’s troops. Most of the country is now under rebel control, with only a few pockets of Gaddafi loyalists still fighting. But some people in the capital say the only fruits of the revolution they’re seeing are uncertainty and fear, as RT’s Maria Finoshina reports:

• Bookmark on Delicious
• Digg this post
• Recommend on Facebook
• share via Reddit
• Share with Stumblers
• Tweet about it
• Subscribe to the comments on this post
• Print for later
• Bookmark in Browser
• Tell a friend

 
Print this page.

Comment Rules

2 Responses to “Fear and Loathing In Libya: Bitter Fruit Of Revolution”

1. Op-Ed: WESTERN FRONT: The Schwarma Republics are Burning
   Published: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:31 AM
   In a Schwarma Republic either the army massacres the mob or overthrows the ruler. Or the rebels cut a deal with some internal elements and wipe out the loyalists.

   Arutz Sheva posts a weekly op-ed column by this popular New York City based writer and freelance commentator, whose special emphasis is the threat to Western civilization posed by the rise in world terror. He blogs at sultanknish.blogspot.com
   ► More from this writer

   Syria is burning, not because of the Arab Spring or Tyranny or Twitter, or any of the other popular explanations. The fire in Syria is the same firestorm burning in Iraq, in Turkey, in Lebanon and throughout much of the Muslim world. It has nothing to do with human rights or democracy. Just the eternal civil war.

   In the Muslim world… gender differences mean you’re a force of corruption or a slave, ethnic differences mean you are the son of a dog, and religious differences mean you’re an enemy.
   Most people accept countries with ancient names like Egypt and Syria as a given. If they think about it at all they assume that they were always around, or were restored after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. But actually the countries of the Middle East are mostly artificial creations borrowing a history that is not their own.

   The fall of the Ottoman Empire brought in the Europeans to reconstruct the Middle East. The modern states are the work of their hands. A clumsy mismatch of borders and warring peoples. The USSR came after with its own line of coups and Arab Socialist dictatorships. Now the third wave of Islamist tyrannies is on the march.
   But none of them can solve the basic problems of the region.

   Syria is burning not because of human rights, but because it’s a collection of different peoples with different variants of Islam who don’t get along. A handful are descended from the original natives. The rest are foreign Arab invaders, some more recent than others. The story repeats itself across the region and across the world.

   Iraq, Bahrain, Syria, Lebanon are just some examples of countries permanently divided by a mismatch of peoples. Agreements and elections come to nothing because no group believes that they will be treated as equals if they aren’t in power. And they’re right. Equality doesn’t just come from open elections, but from a cultural acceptance of differences. This simply does not exist in the Muslim world where gender differences mean you’re a force of corruption or a slave, ethnic differences mean you are the son of a dog, and religious differences mean you’re an enemy.

   For all their bluster and viciousness, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon are abandoned colonies. The Gulf states are even worse, backward clans of cutthroat merchants who are parasitically feeding off the West, even as they try to destroy it.

   The rulers invariably marry Western women or women with a large dose of Western blood. Sadat married the daughter of an English woman. Mubarak married the daughter of a Welsh woman. For all that the Hashemites tout their descent from Mohammed, Queen Noor is more Anglo-Saxon than Arab. And the current Jordanian King’s mother was originally known as Toni Gardner. Even when they do marry Arab women, they are usually Christian Arabs and British educated.

   There’s something pathetic about the sight of the post-colonial Arab leadership trying to gain some psychological legitimacy by intermarrying with their former rulers. As if pumping enough English blood into the veins of their offspring will somehow make them as capable as the Empire that ruled them and then left to attend to its own affairs.

   But not nearly as pathetic as half of them claiming descent from Mohammed. Both reveal the underlying historical instability of their rule. These aren’t nation states, they’re hopelessly dysfunctional geographical divisions bristling with Western weapons and money, with interpretations of the Koran and texts on Arab Socialism, where everyone is a philosopher and a scholar– but no government lasts longer than it takes to overthrow it.

   Every colonel and general dreams of empire, and every cleric in his flea ridden robes theorizes on the Islamic state, but none of them can do anything but act out the same murderous dramas. Building their house of cards and then watching it tumble down.

   When you don’t have a nation, but you do have an army, then what you have is not a state, but a Shawarma Republic. To keep the army from overthrowing the leader, he must find internal or external enemies. When a downturn occurs, and the mobs gather, either the army massacres the mob or overthrows the ruler. Or the rebels cut a deal with some internal elements and wipe out the loyalists.

   This is an old regional narrative that has nothing to do with democracy, human rights, Twitter or any of the other nonsense flowing through New York Times columns faster than the sewers of Cairo.

   The modern Shawarma Republic has some royal or military ruler at the top who receives money from the West or from its enemies to hold up his end of the bargain. Which to him means stowing the money into foreign bank accounts, sending his trophy wife on shopping trips to Paris and striking a fine balance between wiping out his enemies and buying them off.

   Naturally he carries on the ritualistic chant of “Death to Israel”, and if Israel ever looks weak enough, or his new Chinese or Iranian allies kick in the money for a full-fledged invasion, he may even take a whack at it. But mostly the chants of “Death to Israel” are a convenient way to keep his nation’s anger pointed away from him.

   In Syria, Assad’s Shawarma Republic (officially the Syrian Arab Republic, formerly the United Arab Republic, after a bunch of coups and one kingdom, the privately owned fiefdom of the dumbest scion of the clan) is on fire. Because the enemies of the regime, and some of its former allies, got around to exploiting Bashar Assad’s weakness.

   For now Assad’s armies backed by his Iranian allies are in control of the Shawarma Republic of Syria but that might change. Especially now that Turkey and much of the Arab world have stepped into the anti-Assad camp. And when the fireworks die down, and the corpses are cleaned off the streets, there will be another Shawarma Republic. This one may not be run by the Alawites. But it will be run by someone, and it won’t be the people.

   The irony is that after turning Lebanon into its puppet, Syria got the same treatment from Iran. And if a revolt succeeds, then it might get the same treatment from Turkey. The big dog bites the little dog, and the bigger dog bites it.

   You can’t build a country out of sand or armies and billions of dollars. The last 70 years testify to that.
   The reason that Israel works and the Arab world doesn’t is very simple. The Jews retained their identity and their humanity. The perpetrators and victims of Islam who surround them have no roots. Only the sword in their hand and the shifting sand underneath their feet.

2. Alert! There has been an info that NATO is possibly planning a new provocation/staged event in Libya.

   They bought old used Soviet weaponry in Moldova similar to the weaponry used by Gaddafi resistance army, and they are going to stage a “violent terror” by “gaddafi troops” against sitizens of Libya.

   This is going to be filmed for all the BBC/Reuters/other media liars propaganda against Gaddafi!
   Mercenaries dressed up as Gaddafi’s loyalists will presumably do a lot of violence towards innocent citizens, or they also could stage a video of “freedom fighters” being tortured or raped by “Gaddafi monsters”.
   It’s a prediction, but this info is coming from insider sources and afterall, it’s highly possible as such tricks have been pulled off many times by globalists and the liar “official” world media.

   Spread this, and be ready for Libya LIES from the news!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.