Green Fascism: Death by Wind Turbine

May 1st, 2012

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Prisonplanet.com
Tuesday, May 1, 2012

For decades they have been touted by green warriors and global warming believers as the lynch pin of their brave new utopian future. Now it seems that something is truly rotten in the state of Denmark, or the great state of Texas in this case.

Print this page.

Comment Rules

18 Responses to “Green Fascism: Death by Wind Turbine”

Of course chickenshit AGW-deniers intentionally misread and misinterpret the study that states, that wind turbines mix air in the atmosphere. They also state in the same summary that the effect is local and a fraction of the signal created by Anthropogenic Global Warming.

AGW-deniers grasp at anything, no matter how laughable, because NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE refutes AGW!

You might as well face it “you’re addicted to oil!”

Rune Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 5:53 am

who do you work for storky?

you should tell us for two reasons

one: you would actually being passing on some truth here for once and you would earn a tiny bit of respect

two: telling lies continually is bad for your health–you might do yourself some good

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:46 am

Which is why I am confident and healthy. I tell NO lies!

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 10:04 am

Unless you are unfortunate enough to accually collide with one of it’s componenets, “Death by Wind Turbine” is the BEST RIDICULOUSLY STUPID HEADLINE, EVER!

Nebuchadnezzar Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:58 am

Storky, you should obey your husband.
Don’t get out of home without his permission.
You must obey him.

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 10:06 am

Science and speculation are at least two things YOU REALLY SUCK AT!

ivehadenuff Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:52 am

Actually… there is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that refutes natural variability either. NONE! There has been no “global warming” for over a decade, and even the infamous Phil Jones, head of the UEA mothership of AGW lies and computer model fraud, was forced to admit that.

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:50 am

WRONG on ALL counts, clowny!

Here is one of more than 10,000 studies that inndicate that Global Warming is manmade and increasing:

Investigating the possibility of a human component
in various pacific decadal oscillation indices
springerlink.com/content/w661873236444q18/fulltext.pdf

In the twenty first century scenarios, a systematic anthropogenic component is found in all three PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation) indices. Under the first definition—in which no warming signal is removed—this component is so large that it is also statistically detectable in the observed PDO. Using the second/traditional definition, this component is also large, and arises primarily from the differential warming rates predicted in the North Pacific and over global oceans. Removing the spatial average SST (sea Surface Temperature) signal in the PDO region (in the third definition) partially solves this problem, but a human signal persists because the predicted pattern of SST response to human forcing projects strongly onto the PDO pattern.

In other words, regardless of the analysis method used, in the twentieth century, human activities are found to have a profound and measurable effect on Pacific Ocean surface temperatures.

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:58 am

As for your Phil Jones fiction:

bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13719510
Global warming since 1995 ‘now significant’

By widespread convention, scientists use a minimum threshold of 95% to assess whether a trend is likely to be down to an underlying cause, rather than emerging by chance.

If a trend meets the 95% threshold, it basically means that the odds of it being down to chance are less than one in 20.

Last year’s analysis, which went to 2009, did not reach this threshold; but adding data for 2010 takes it over the line.

“The trend over the period 1995-2009 was significant at the 90% level, but wasn’t significant at the standard 95% level that people use,” Professor Jones told BBC News.

“Basically what’s changed is one more year [of data]. That period 1995-2009 was just 15 years – and because of the uncertainty in estimating trends over short periods, an extra year has made that trend significant at the 95% level which is the traditional threshold that statisticians have used for many years.

In other words, ivehadenuff, you’re just another AGW-denier LIAR!

ivehadenuff Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 10:46 am

Latest UK Met Office global temperature data confirms that the world has not warmed in the past 15 years.

Analysis by the GWPF of the newly released HadCRUT4 global temperature database shows that there has been no global warming in the past 15 years – a timescale that challenges current models of global warming.

Professor Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit: “Bottom line – the no upward trend has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.”

“Worried”?? Worried about what Phil, that reality does not agree with your useless, corrupted climate modes? 15 years – times up Phil!

Dr David Whitehouse, science editor of the GWPF, said:

“We are at the point where the temperature standstill is becoming the dominant feature of the post-1980 warming, and as such cannot be dismissed as being unimportant even when viewed over 30 years.”

“It is time that the scientific community in general and the IPCC in particular acknowledged the reality of the global temperature standstill and the very real challenge it implies for our understanding of climate change and estimates of its future effects.”

“It is a demonstration that the science is not settled, and that there are great uncertainties in our understanding of the real-world greenhouse effect when combined with anthropogenic and natural factors.”
Alex ping ponging between the wrath of God, “I can’t take it anymore” and cynical comedy stitch is expected in the daily radio show, but it throws a hand grenade into the idea of a more professional ‘nightly news’ broadcast.

Gloobner Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:16 am

So the reason why they are doing a nightly news is to be more like the main stream (proffesional)? I didn’t know that. Maybe you should do your own show that mimics the stiff neck news jockeys reading telepromters. It’s his show and I don’t expect him to act any different. He still delivers the facts. Do I think he’s over the top sometimes? Yes, but I’m only looking for information and no one else is providing it. Rock on Alex.
really? you morons are going to believe a spinning fan is causing Climate Change but burning fossil fuels is completely safe? Get fucking real

GeorgeZip Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:23 am

Clean renewable energy vs. filthy poisonous oil….hmmmm….that’s a tough one!

The answer depends on your state of mind. People with clean minds will automatically gravitate towards clean energy, while people with filthy minds will insist on their “right” to live in filth and pollute the planet.

Stupid is as stupid does.
There goes Storky, continually looking dorky.

storky Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:59 am

Thought that up all by yoursely, pussy?
Sick twisted joke…..
Yes wind and solar are the enemy! We must burn more oil because global warming is a myth! The ice caps are not melting! 97% of climate scientists are dead wrong. 11 species are not going extinct every day (it used to be 3-5 every decade). The only reason I log into this site is to get a fresh look at government conspiracies and 911 cover-ups. You Paultards are worse than the tea-baggers (maybe are the same?).