Indian CDC Doctors Blow Whistle on Bill Gates and W.H.O.-Funded Hydroxychloroquine Studies Which Gave Lethal Doses to Show Inefficacy and Danger

Above image: WHO President Tedros Adhanom and Bill Gates

As the US response to what was reported as a new virus out of bat caves in China ramped up, Bill Gates and the World Health Organization (WHO) funded influential studies designed to turn researchers away from hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a remedy for COVID. Doctors around the world were reporting great success when used properly in the early stages.

HCQ studies as a whole still show overwhelmingly favorable results in the treatment of COVID, showing 72% lower mortality when administered early.

Yale School of Public Health’s Dr. Harvey Risch said in December of 2022 that US health authorities (such as Anthony Fauci) had sentenced up to “500,000 people to death from the infection because they couldn’t get treated because of the suppression of these treatments.” (Risch video)

Dr. Harvey Risch

In the US, since COVID began, 94% of deaths listed as from COVID have been people over age 50, and 75% of those over age 65. Government totals do not distinguish between COVID as the primary cause of death or a “contributing” cause of death, which could mean a positive test.

In March 2020, even before news of the possible success of HCQ became widely known, Gates began funding a University of Washington study which found it ineffective in treating COVID. But the study administered HCQ alone rather than in the specific protocol combining it with Zinc and Azithromycin.

Another University of Washington study, which has Gates and Seattle-based Microsoft as its most generous donors, ran another study discounting HCQ which was doomed to fail. Gates has given nearly a half billion dollars to UW over the years.

But the coup d’grace in corrupting the medical establishment for Gates is WHO. As the UN health organization charged with leading the world’s response to a pandemic, WHO has outsized influence on any aspect of a response. In turn, mega-donor Bill Gates has outsized influence on WHO.

The WHO studies, and others alongside them also funded by Gates, subjected COVID patients to known lethal doses of HCQ, or about four times the maximum label dose. In one of the studies, the UK Recovery Trial run by Oxford University, COVID patients who were subjected to the dosages died at a rate 10% higher than those who were given nothing at all. Gates largess weighs heavily at Oxford as well.

In June of 2020 Gates plied $750 million on Oxford for a campaign to vaccinate people in poor countries with Astrazeneca. Astrazeneca’s vaccine has now been banned in 18 countries so far over deaths and severe blood clots. The episode is reminiscent of Gates’ sordid history in the Third World, especially India and Africa, which despite a vigorous “debunk” campaign calling this a “conspiracy theory,” is attested to by Indian doctors such as Dr. Visant Lad. See: “Indian High Court Orders Bill Gates to Respond to Vaccine Death Lawsuit.”

Dr. Meryl Nass, MD, an internal medicine specialist in Ellsworth, Maine, noted in her blog in June of 2020 that WHO’s own consultant, in a past study, had determined that 1500 – 2000 mg of HCQ all at once could be a lethal dose. HCQ generally comes in a standard 200 mg dose per pill.

HCQ brand Plaquenil standard 200 mg pill

Dr. Nass wrote in her blog in June 2020:

“The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of chloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs.  Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of chloroquine base “may be fatal.”  According to Browning and Goldfrank, the pharmacokinetics and potency of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are almost identical…”

Below:  Page 5, WHO study on toxicity of chloroquine, similar dosage profile to related hydroxychloroquine (CLICK FOR LAGER IMAGE) (SOURCE)

About a month after they started, the WHO Solidarity Trial and the UK Recovery Trial were halted.

On June 15, 2020, the FDA withdrew Emergency Use Authorization for HCQ, directly citing the UK Recovery trial as a reason (FDA letter.)

In its attached “Memorandum Explaining Basis for Revocation of Emergency Use Authorization for Emergency Use of Chloroquine Phosphate and Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate,” the FDA wrote:

“the RECOVERY Trial results offer persuasive evidence of a lack of benefit of HCQ in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.”

The trials backed by Gates were stopped prematurely due to predictable poor results, which generated headlines greatly dampening enthusiasm for the study of HCQ in the treatment of COVID.

Maximum Official Recommended Dose of HCQ is 2000 mg Over Four Days

The maximum official recommended dose for HCQ in the treatment of other maladies is 2000 mg over 4 days. In the UK Recovery Trial, with “core funding” from the  Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a dosage of 9600 mg over 10 days was administered.

Below: Dosing information for UK Recovery Trial, from official protocol (source)

Below: Standard HCQ brand Plaquenil maximum dosage instructions. Reads: “Adult patients: Administer 800 mg initially; subsequently administer 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the initial dose (total dosage = 2000 mg over 4 days). (Source)

In the other study which bore Gates’ imprimatur, through direct funding but, perhaps more importantly, through the enormous influence he had, and continues to have, at the World Health Organization (WHO), dosing of similar magnitude to the Recovery Trial was administered.

Although, wrote Dr. Nass, the WHO Solidarity Trial protocol was vague as to dosing, the Norwegian and Canadian portions of the international trial, which included the participation of 35 countries as of June 3, 2020, indicated that the dosing was 8800 mg over 10 days.

Dr. Nass wrote that WHO dosing in its official report was “deliberately vague”:

“The…WHO report on dosing…seems to be deliberately vague regarding the dose used in the Solidarity trial, stating the number of milligrams per tablet, but not the number of tablets to be used.  The Solidarity trial is registered but the registration fails to specify dosages.”

“The registration of the Canadian portion of the Solidarity trial informs us of its HCQ dose: ten 200 mg tablets during the first 24 hours (800 mg initial dose, 800 mg 12 hours later then 400 mg every 12 hours for 9 more days).  This is 2.0 grams during the first 24 hours, and a cumulative dose of 8.8 grams over 10 days, or only 0.4 grams less than what Recovery used. The Norwegian Solidarity trial uses dosing identical to Canada.”

Dr. Nass said that the UK Recovery Trial used the “equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine…in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients.”

Two months after the Recovery Trial began, investigators suspended it, reporting:

‘We have concluded that there is no beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. We have therefore decided to stop enrolling participants to the hydroxychloroquine arm of the RECOVERY Trial with immediate effect.”

The final report noted that COVID patients given these high doses died at a 10% higher rate than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Gates is WHO and WHO is Gates

The World Health Organization’s (WHO,) largest donation comes from the combined donations of two Bill Gates-controlled entities, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI,) which Gates founded.

Despite its own record of conducting deadly experiments such as the lethally-dosed Solidarity Trial, WHO has just released a video which attacks the un-COVID-vaccinated and “anti-vaccine activism” as a “major killing force globally.” It is a vicious, no-holds-barred attack on anyone declining a corporate product, one from a company, Pfizer, which already has one of the worst safety records in the world, having been slapped with over $10 billion in fines since 2020.

Delivering the message is Dr. Peter Hotez, the controversial go-to “vaccine expert” called upon by CNN and MSNBC for attacks on “anti-vaxxers.” Unreported by CNN, in August 2022 it was discovered that Hotez had funded gain-of-function coronavirus research at Wuhan lab in China, while publicly calling the idea that the COVID virus could have been made in a lab an “outlandish conspiracy.”

Bill Gates, the world’s most enthusiastic COVID vaccine promoter, once said “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.” Gates also said “You don’t get a choice” when it comes to being COVID-vaccinated.

Gates: “You don’t get a choice” (view at Rumble)

Below source: DW.com

It can be safely said that the interests of WHO and Gates are closely intertwined. In 2019, the Washington Post scoffed at the idea that Gates did not have active influence in the organizations he donates billions to. Reporting on another area of Gates philanthropy, education, the Washington Post noted in an article entitled, “Um, Who Are Bill and Melinda Gates Trying to Kid?”:

“…the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s annual letter was published and addressed nine things the couple said surprised them along their philanthropic journey.

This was Surprise #8: “Textbooks are becoming obsolete.”

The two then discuss the issue, not actually proving that textbooks are becoming obsolete — possibly because they aren’t — but instead talking up the virtues of online education. Why would the founder of Microsoft want to tout online education?”

In 2017, before COVID, reporters at Politico wrote:

“The [Gates] foundation’s impact on the WHO is enormous,” said Garrett, of the Council on Foreign Relations. “If they weren’t there, if they walked away with their money, the deleterious impact would be profound, and everyone is all too aware of that.”

Although not a doctor, a scientist, nor even a college graduate, Gates once offered a medical opinion that HCQ is plagued by “severe side effects,” although it is considered a safe drug taken by billions of people each year, including children and lactating women, for the treatment and prevention of malaria It is routinely prescribed to Americans traveling to tropical regions.

Politico said:

“Some billionaires are satisfied with buying themselves an island. Bill Gates got a United Nations health agency in Geneva…Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom…The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s.” 

Indian Health Authority Doctors Blow Whistle on WHO Solidarity Trial

India’s ICMR is its official medical research agency, roughly the equivalent of the CDC in the US. Alluding to the extremely high doses of HQC being administered in the WHO Solidarity Trial, in May of 2020 the New Indian Express reported in “ICMR writes to WHO disagreeing with HCQ assessment, officials say international trial dosage four times higher than India”:

“India’s nodal government agency ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) overseeing the country’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has…written to the WHO citing differences in dosage standards between Indian and international trials that could explain the efficacy issues of HCQ in treating COVID-19 patients.”

The doctors at the ICMU told WHO that Solidarity’s doses were too high, and that good results were being obtained by Indian doctors prescribing 2400 mg spread out over five days, rather than in a toxic blast all at once..

The New Indian Express described its successful protocol:

“HCQ dosages are administered in the following way- 1st day a heavy dose of 400mg HCQ dose once in the morning and one at night, followed by 200 mg HCQ one in the morning and one at night to be followed for the next four days. The total dosage administered to a patient in 5 days, therefore, amounts to 2400 mg.”

Dr. Meryl Nass, MD wrote in her blog in June of 2020:

“Last week, I was alerted to the fact that India’s ICMR, its official medical research agency, had written to the WHO, telling WHO that the hydroxychloroquine doses being used in the Solidarity trial were 4 times higher than the doses being used in India.  Then I learned that Singapore had been hesitant to participate in the WHO trial due to the hydroxychloroquine dose.”

In other words, WHO was administering nearly 10,000 mg, four times more, over 10 days, an extraordinary amount of HCQ.

Holocaust Survivor, Human Rights Activist Vera Sharav Minces No Words

Never one to mince words, Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor, tireless human rights activist, and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, wrote in June 2020:

“Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.”

  • Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.
  • Recovery [Trial] experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.

There has been no shortage of HCQ studies yielding disappointing or even alarming results when used in the treatment of COVID, all of them flawed, whose money and influence trail is difficult to discern. In Brazil, a study published on April 24, 2020 administered 12,000 mg of chloroquine, a precursor of HCQ with a similar dosage profile, over 10 days. The study’s authors seemed surprised to note that:

” Lethality until day 13 was 39.0% in the high-dosage group (16 of 41) and 15.0% in the low-dosage group (6 of 40).”

The study obligingly concluded that:

“The preliminary findings of this study suggest that the higher CQ dosage should not be recommended for critically ill patients with COVID-19 because of its potential safety hazards…”

In 2021, long after the Gates-backed trials were exposed, the prestigious British Medical Journal nevertheless said in “Misleading clinical evidence and systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19,” by Luis Ignacio Garegnani of the Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina:

 “despite the development of new therapies and the attempts for implementing repurposed drugs (because of their potential immunomodulator or antiviral effects), no reliable specific therapy has been identified yet. Azithromycin, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are some of those drugs, whose adverse effects and/or concerns about efficacy on COVID-19 treatment have determined its deimplementation by different agencies and regulatory authorities…” (Italics added)

The BMJ, very unscientifically, never specifies the studies which have determined the “deimplementation” of HCQ, but the Solidarity and Recovery studies are lingering in the air.

Even after the Recovery, Solidarity, and other high-dose trials have been discredited, Internet searches continue to turn up misinformation based on them, either directly or by inference. On April 24, 2020 the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota issued a stern warning that the FDA had  issued a warning on the use of HCQ. The University of Minnesota posted:

“The warning is related to the potential for the drugs to prolong the QT interval—a cardiogram measurement used to assess some of the electrical properties of the heart—and cause abnormal heart rhythms, particularly in patients with cardiac conditions. Those risks may increase when the drugs are combined with the antibiotic azithromycin, which can further increase the risk for sudden cardiac arrest.

The post goes on to cite the Brazil study. The warning remains online to this day.

The tradition of maligning possibly good cures with junk science which borders on criminal continues in the ongoing war on HCQ and Ivermectin. As recently as December of 2022, lead investigator Dr. Adrian Hernandez, of the Duke University School of Medicine, generated a UPI headline “Another study shows ivermectin doesn’t work against COVID-19” when he turned in a paper in which the authors declare support from a mish-mash of Big Pharma and medical establishment, including AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Pulmatric, Sanofi-Aventis, Genentech, NIH, NIAID. and the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.

Dr. Hernendez’z’s study administered .6 mg of Ivermectin per kg of body weight for 6 days. The typical maximum dose for Ivermectin for common diseases is a one-time dose of .2 mg/kg, repeated after two weeks, a miniscule fraction of that.

The metric for success in the study was that the patient not report any symptoms of COVID for 3 days, a loose threshold.

Hernandez’s’s study concluded: [the] “findings do not support the use of ivermectin in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.” Interestingly, 84% of the study participants were vaccinated with two or more COVID vaccine doses.

Nevertheless, without mentioning these annoying details, the UPI reported, with no critical comment from doctors or scientists with an opposing view, that “Another trial finds no benefit from ivermectin for COVID symptoms.”

A South Carolina Department of Health 2021 advisory warned that reports suggesting success in the use of Ivermectin for COVID were “unscientific.” But many were field reports from frontline doctors and were not meant to constitute full-blown studies. The SC Health Department advisory warns in “The Dangers of Using Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for Preventing or Treating COVID-19”:

“In some unpublished reports in other countries (e.g., Egypt, India, Iran, Iraq) Ivermectin seemed to improve outcomes for COVID-19 patients, but these were not scientific studies. Multiple studies published on Ivermectin have been subsequently retracted when they were found to be based on falsified data or errors in analysis and are misleading.”

In its link to “misleading,” the SC Department of Heath circles back to the British Medical Journal article which never cites a study for its conclusions, but strongly suggests the Recovery Trial which had directly caused “different agencies and regulatory authorities,” such as the FDA, to ‘deimplement’ HCQ.

The Vaccines Vaccines and Only Vaccines Agenda Continues. Why?

By August of 2020 articles were appearing which warned against the misuse of drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin, which conflated improper use of the drugs with the drugs themselves. One was the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s “More than 100 Americans have died after taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 despite Donald Trump insisting people had ‘nothing to lose’ by trying the unproven drug.”

A year later, after over 6,000 deaths following the COVID vaccines had been reported to the same government reporting system, there was no headline in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, or any other newspaper. Now it is over 32,000.

With a similar campaign taking place against Ivermectin, the primary objective remained on-track. Nothing would get in the way of universal access to everyone’s bloodstreams under the guise of “vaccination.” FDA Emergency Use Authorization requires that there be no viable alternative treatments to a disease.

Doctors bucking the directive were fired, threatened with prosecution, had their medical licenses yanked, and were smeared as “quacks” despite decades of impeccable service.

Below: Press Conference by Houston Methodist Hospital Dr. Mary Bowden suspended for positive Twitter remarks on Ivermectin as treatment for COVID (View at Bitchute)

Obviously this was important to someone, to people with the enormous power to corrupt entire institutions such as the mainstream media, government regulatory agencies, and the medical establishment. The lethal dosing of Recovery Trial and Solidarity Trial patients should have been big news, but instead, doctors talking about it risked being banned from Twitter for “misinformation,” and being branded as anti-vaxxer quacks, no matter how distinguished their credentials were.

Of the mainstream media, only Laura Ingraham in early 2020 got the story,and ran with it (below.) Even in the alternative media few were aware of the enormity of the deception, with the exception of Del Bigtree (below.)

Laura Ingraham

Del Bigtree (view at Rumble)

But as a number of deep and critical thinkers have maintained, it is not that hard to figure out. The inexorable move toward universal, mandatory, regular mass vaccination is the key to the roll-out of a global, mandatory, digital ID, purportedly as proof of vaccine status but also now linked to every bit of information on everyone on the planet, who does not belong to a miniscule exempt class of billionaires, and also linked to a single digital currency which can be shut off at the first sign of social “misbehavior.”

Bill Gates: The Banned Documentary (view at Rumble)

For a full understanding of how this would work it is important to be familiar with the following carefully selected, short list of articles and video interviews. For more on Bill Gates’ enormous influence on the world response to COVID, see “REPORT 9”: THE BILL GATES-FUNDED PAPER WHICH CREATED THE ‘NEW NORMAL’ GOVERNMENT POWERS IN APRIL 2020”

Children’s Health Defense: “Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.”

The late Dr. Zev Zelenko, discoverer of HCQ COVID protocol, on his discovery, Fauci, and owners of the major media Blackrock and Vanguard (VIDEO).

George HW Bush Administration Official Catherine Austin Fitts Lays Out The Great Reset and How to Stop It (VIDEO)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 5G, digital currency, and the Great Reset

Top Scientists Explain How the CDC’s Own Data Shows That Vaccines Are Designed to “Kill People Intentionally.”

Epoch TV: 31,696 COVID Vaccine Death Claims Submitted to CDC’s Reporting System Since 2020: Triple All Other Vaccines Combined Over 30 Years 

 Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer (CSO) and Vice President for Pfizer, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg,  former Chairman of the Council of Europe Health Committee, vaccines may be a mass “killing weapon” (View at Rumble)

Huge COVID Vaccine-Injured Rally in Los Angeles Blacked Out by Major Media, Injury Court Claims Skyrocket

1,000+ Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries

Real Not Rare (Vaccine-injured website)

Real Not Rare Facebook

Brave Denver Police Officer Crippled by Mandated Vax, Breaks Down on TV ‘Can’t Carry My Kids to Bed’

Crippling COVID injection reactions (view in Bitchute)

Pfizer Executive Admits COVID Vaccine Does Not Stop Transmission

Source

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes