Jew World Order

“But, Mr. Secretary,” said Alger Hiss, “no one can ignore the terrible power  of this weapon.” “Nevertheless,” said Stettinius, “our entire postwar  program depends on terrifying the world with the atomic bomb.” “To  accomplish that goal,” said John Foster Dulles, “you will need a very good  tally. I should say a million.” “Yes,” replied Stettinius, “we are hoping  for a million tally in Japan. But if they surrender, we won’t have  anything.” “Then you have to keep them in the war until the bomb is ready,”  said John Foster Dulles. “That is no problem. Unconditional surrender.”  “They won’t agree to that,” said Stettinius. “They are sworn to protect the  Emperor.” “Exactly,” said John Foster Dulles. “Keep Japan in the war another  three months, and we can use the bomb on their cities; we will end this war  with the naked fear of all the peoples of the world, who will then bow to  our will.”

Comment: The Zionists are a CRIME Syndicate that plan for these bombs to be dropped next on Americans. As Americans are vaporized and burnt to death ZIONISTS will be having an orgasm they will be so excited to be rid of the goyim even though the American Goyim Military have served ZIONISTS so WELL.

This secret meeting in the Garden Room was actually the first military  strategy session of the United Nations, because it was dedicated to its  mission of exploding the world’s first atomic weapon on a living population.  It also forecast the entire strategy of the Cold War, which lasted  forty-three years, cost American taxpayers five trillion dollars, and  accomplished exactly nothing, as it was intended to do. Thus we see that the  New World Order has based its entire strategy on the agony of the hundreds  of thousands of civilians burned alive at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, including  many thousands of children sitting in their schoolrooms. These leaders had  learned from their master, Josef Stalin, that no one can rule without mass  terrorism, which in turn required mass murder. As Senator Vandenberg, leader  of the Republican loyal opposition, was to say (as quoted in American  Heritage magazine, August 1977), “We have got to scare the hell out of “em.”

THE JEWISH HELL-BOMB The atomic bomb was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico.  The top secret project was called the Manhattan Project, because its secret  director, Bernard Baruch, lived in Manhattan, as did many of the other  principals. Baruch had chosen Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves to head the  operation. He had previously built the Pentagon, and had a good reputation  among the Washington politicians, who usually came when Baruch beckoned. The scientific director at Los Alamos was J. Robert Oppenheimer, scion of a  prosperous family of clothing merchants. In Oppenheimer; the Years Of Risk,  by James Kunetka, Prentice Hall, NY, 1982, Kunetka writes, p. 106, “Baruch  was especially interested in Oppenheimer for the position of senior  scientific adviser.” The project cost an estimated two billion dollars. No  other nation in the world could have afforded to develop such a bomb. The  first successful test of the atomic bomb occurred at the Trinity site, two  hundred miles south of Los Alamos at 5:29:45 a.m. on July 16, 1945. Oppenheimer was beside himself at the spectacle. He shrieked, “I am become  Death, the Destroyer of worlds.” Indeed, this seemed to be the ultimate goal  of the Manhattan Project, to destroy the world. There had been considerable  fear among the scientists that the test explosion might indeed set off a  chain reaction, which would destroy the entire world. Oppenheimer’s  exultation came from his realization that now his people had attained the  ultimate power, through which they could implement their five-thousand-year  desire to rule the entire world. 

THE BUCK PASSES TO TRUMAN Although Truman liked to take full credit for the decision to drop the  atomic bomb on Japan, in fact, he was advised by a prestigious group, The  National Defense Research Committee, consisting of George L. Harrison,  president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Dr. James B. Conant,  president of Harvard, who had spent the First World War developing more  effective poison gases, and who in 1942 had been commissioned by Winston  Churchill to develop an Anthrax bomb to be used on Germany, which would have  killed every living thing in Germany. Conant was unable to perfect the bomb  before Germany surrendered, otherwise he would have had another line to add  to his resume.  His service on Truman’s Committee which advised him to drop  the atomic bomb on Japan, added to his previous record as a chemical warfare  professional, allowed me to describe him in papers filed before the United  States Court of Claims in 1957, as “the most notorious war criminal of the  Second World War”. As Gauleiter of Germany after the war, he had ordered the  burning of my book, The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, ten thousand copies  having been published in Oberammergau, the site of the world-famed Passion  Play.

Only the United States or Uncle Satan was dedicated to developing the EVIL Atomic Bomb.

The story begins in Germany. In the 1930s, Germany and Japan had a number  of scientists icing on the development of nuclear fission. In both of these  countries, their leaders sternly forbade them to continue their research.  Adolf Hitler said he would never allow anyone in Germany to work to work on  such an inhumane weapon.

Comment: Note that Japan AND Germany forbade their scientists to work on something as pure evil as the Atomic Bomb. Uncle Satan representing the most evil, vile nation on the face of the earth couldn’t begin work fast enough! Proof the U.S. is the evilest country on earth! The Jewish Crime Syndicate was Behind These Atrocities aka Khazarian Mafie-the Evilest Bunch that ever existed in human history.

Second-Guessing Hiroshima?

Printer Friendly Version

by Uday Hohan and Leo Maley III on Jul 29, 1998

Second-guessing the necessity and morality of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 53 years ago is nothing new. Contrary to widely held opinion, the first critics of America’s use of atomic weapons were not disillusioned 1960s radicals but figures from the conservative establishment and the highest ranks of the military.

Criticism began within days of the obliteration of the two Japanese cities. On August 8, 1945, two days after the destruction of Hiroshima, former President Herbert Hoover wrote, “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.”

Two days later, John Foster Dulles and Methodist Bishop G. Bromley Oxnam together urged President Truman to forgo additional use of the new weapon, saying they opposed the bomb’s indiscriminate obliteration of human beings.

Within days of the Hiroshima bombing, David Lawrence, the editor of what is now “U.S. News & World Report,” wrote that Japanese surrender had appeared inevitable weeks before the bomb’s use. The claim of “military necessity,” he argued, rang hollow. Official justifications would “never erase from our minds the simple truth that we, of all civilized nations . . . did not hesitate to employ the most destructive weapon of all times indiscriminately against men, women and children.”

Such criticisms were not limited to civilians. The very day after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the personal pilot of General Douglas MacArthur, commander of Allied forces in the Pacific, recorded in his diary that MacArthur was “appalled and depressed by this Frankenstein monster.”

In 1963 President Eisenhower, the Allied commander in Europe during World War II, recalled, as he did on several other occasions, that in July 1945 he had opposed using the atomic bomb on Japan during a meeting with Secretary of War Henry Stimson: “. . . I told him I was against it on two counts. First, the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Second, I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon.”

No one should easily discount these views. These six men were all respected public figures. With the exception of Oxnam, all were conservatives. None was a pacifist. None of the five who survived into the 1960s publicly opposed the war in Vietnam.

Their dissenting opinions were not based on hindsight. They voiced their beliefs even before the war ended. These men considered the use of the atomic bomb to have been militarily unnecessary and morally repugnant based on the information available to them in the summer of 1945.

Keep this in mind when, on Hiroshima anniversaries, you hear claims that opposition to the bombing emerged only in the 1960s, or that critics must, necessarily, be liberals or pacifists.

The comments of men such as Hoover and Eisenhower, leading Republicans whose qualities of caution and prudence cannot be questioned, lend support to the view that America’s use of atomic weapons to end World War II cannot easily be defended. The passage of time has done nothing to alter these considered judgments.

Uday Hohan, a writer for the History News Service, is a graduate student at American University who is researching and writing about Hiroshima and American culture. 

Leo Maley III, a writer for the History News Service, is a graduate student at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, where he is researching and writing about Hiroshima and American culture.