by Niflson’s Mind
I have often said that our current struggle for survival as a race is closer to the Greco-Persian Wars than to the Peloponnesian war. The significance of the comparison should be obvious at the end of this writing, since the latter was an internal war whereas the former was perceived as a war against aliens. Never mind the fact that the Persians of the time would be seen, more than likely, as White people if put into contrast with the vast amount of mongrels that populate that same region today. But, for the sake of this piece, let us view them as significantly foreign to the ‘Greeks’ of the time.
The war that the White Race is facing today is one where our disparate territories are being attacked by a massive foreign onslaught, directed by an enemy who wishes to eradicate us and transmute us into something closer to themselves. Unlike the Second World War, this fight is not about European hegemony, nor about the triumph of socio/economic ideologies, nor about securing particular living space for a nationality. This fight is about survival.
In any war where the issues involved are mere territorial abstractions or proposed sociological ideas, the primal elements that define said conflict arise from orthodoxies and/or variant heresies within it. In other words, maintaining strong convictions and being immovable from rigid perspectives is in fact the very nature of the struggle being waged. Most European wars have been basically of this kind. Europe has been enmeshed for millennia in fratricidal affairs in which different ethnic sub-groups fight amongst each other for either land, leadership or basic conceptions about the supernatural or the social. These wars were not about survival ‘per se’ but about definition. Most wars in Europe were thus similar to the Peloponnesian War referenced above.
To be clear, this is not to say that I adhere to the egalitarian or pacifist view that these conflicts were inherently wrong or destructive. Without practicing with each other for all this time, Native Europeans wouldn’t be the strongest, smartest, and most technologically sound people (i.e. warriors) this solar system has ever seen. We are in fact the ‘master race’ because of our tendency to conflict, compete, and fight for what we consider right. The issue at hand is not the morality of this natural tendency but the practicality of applying it right now, in this specific moment in our history. I am basically suggesting a suspension of our inner quibbling for the sake of directing our energies to a more important fight.
As precedent, I have thus referenced at the start of this article one of the many wars in which our very existence as a racial group was threatened by a foreign entity and itself being a great example of how we pulled it together to get things done. These wars have held an almost mystic fascination throughout our history, from the 300 Spartans (of the famous Greco-Persian war) to the Crusades and the culture of knighthood which came to fruition because of it. The motivations behind these wars could be argued in multiple ways (knowing our people, we could probably end up warring about this very issue!), but in the end, most nation/states in Europe, when faced with similar threats involving clearly foreign enemies, pulled it together to fight as one. The reason for this lies in the clear understanding that fighting each other over ‘ideas’, while our entire population is threatened from without, is suicidal and counterproductive. Basic survival supersedes any sport, including killing each other over concepts. During the Greco-Persian wars there were plenty of different nations and countless ideological differences amongst them (differences of both organization and cultural perspective). But in the end, Athenians and Spartans fought together as best they could against the common enemy, and because of it, they survived. Ideological and political mores aside, when it comes down to the wire, most Athenians wanted those “crazy Spartans” knocking heads and standing their ground while most Spartans were similarly glad to see Athenian triremes hunting down the enemy.
We are now in the unfortunate situation where most White Racialists treat this fight as if it were a continuation of continental European history. As if we are still back there in the 1700’s, 1800’s, or 1900’s, fighting each other for mere specs of ideological and/or metaphysical dignity. Some of us even fight as if we are still in the middle of both World Wars in Europe (uniforms and all). Nevertheless, we are not living in those days. We are, right now, looking down the barrel of a loaded gun and the trigger is half-way squeezed.
What could possibly explain this sordid attitude apparently inherent in our people? The truth is that White people (in general) have an obsessive affinity for universalism. We somehow always proclaim that our perspective is not only correct for us personally, but for every single person we meet, every race, the flora/fauna, and even any possible alien we may encounter in the universe. This tendency may do wonders for philosophy, science, architecture, theology, and the rest of our intellectual pastimes, but it does horrible things when our practical biological imperative to survive is put to the test. This ‘universalist’ tendency is also at fault for bringing into our habitat millions of Non-White undesirables after our attempts at domestication go sour. We do this simply because, so goes the narrative, if clothing, democracy, justice, apple pie, and Jesus are good for us, they must be awesome for them too. In truth, it is our arrogant and implicit acknowledgment of our superiority that makes us complicit in our own destruction.
So, for the sake of continuing to exist in this planet, we must become a bit more flexible when it comes to our views on ‘strategy’ and begin to collectively get our act together in front of the wave of Non-White competitors whose sole aim is to displace us. We must put a hold on our desire to share our achievements with others and begin to set our defenses straight. It is high time we ‘circle the wagons’.
At this point, getting too particular about “who and why” in the latest White advocacy group this year is illogical, and it turns us away from focusing on our main objective. This doesn’t mean that we sacrifice our honor and values nor that we don’t join up with any particular group, it simply means that we assume a smarter perspective on what our fight is and engage all White Racialists with at least the basic respect that they all deserve for being active fighters for the cause of White European existence. It basically serves no purpose to join the “Persians” in insulting the “Athenians” for the sake of convincing them that we are not as bad as those “barbarian” Spartans. The proverbial Persians of today are our declared enemies, their approval or adulation is irrelevant and harmful to us. It is in fact a sign of weakness to seek their favor.
A good example of how distorted our approach to this fight has become can be underscored with how many within our movement view our own racial qualities and the way we approve those who are allowed to fight on our side.
Many in the movement hold a ‘nordicist’ view of race, in which only those with a very specific set of physical traits are approved for participation (specific height of forehead, jaw definition, eye/hair coloration, etc.). This is a remnant of the healthy period of scientific racism that our people went through in the late 19th Century. This is not inherently a bad thing, but at this point, we really can’t afford to pull out the skull measuring tools every time we want to decide who can fight for our cause. Some in our movement hold a more geographic sense of race, in which you are White only if you reside within “traditional” White regions of the world, and if you do not, then you are at least suspect of possibly being mixed with some local Non-White. Again, this may be an interesting debate in our libraries, but at this point, we can take all the manpower we can muster as long as the people involved are easily categorized as White by most rational standards. Usually, our own enemies can easily categorize Whites for us, especially in ‘do or die’ situations like the L.A. race riots.
I, for instance, take a more practical view of “Whiteness”. Irrespective of being categorized as an Alpine, Nordic, or a Mediterranean (or any sub-category we can add to the list), if the person is clearly White, seems to care for his race, and doesn’t claim to be a Jew, then said person should be good enough at this point in our war. {Jews are generally easily recognized RACIALLY/physically but by rejecting those who identify themselves as Jewish, it gives us an additional ‘fail safe’}
After all, the whole point of us advocating Eugenics is to slowly but surely help Nature out in the process of advancing our gene pool and building a better progeny. After we secure a safe haven for our people, and only at that point, can we have the luxury of arguing the details of what true purity entails and/or should look like, but at this point it is simply mental masturbation.
In other words, when faced with all of these issues, we have to accept a ‘trench’ mentality. We must ask: Will this person next to me hold fast in the middle of a fire-fight (this is meant both symbolically and literally)? Has he proven himself to be consistently on our side? If the answer is yes, then whether or not he/she is from Madagascar, is a Christian Evangelical, and listens to Satanic Black Metal is absolutely secondary to the task at hand. I personally may not like any of the characteristics listed, but I can argue the issues later if need be… after we win.
Again, I do have clear and definite convictions, I do have a core set of values, and I even have structured views on what strategy is best and which movement is the most effective, but I try hard not to confuse orthodoxy with stubbornness. Many of our own views might be perceived as anathema to some groups, but we should do our very best to communicate our particular perspective only when constructive, while simultaneously holding an open door policy on all White Racialists who with honesty and courage fight for the future of our children. If the issue is contentious and irrelevant to the final goal, doing our best to side step it is in all of our interests.
Why? Because we must win… we have no other alternative.
Source Article from http://renegadetribune.com/join-at-least-for-a-while/