Michelle Obama Applauds NYC Soda Ban

  • Print

    The Alex Jones Channel
    Alex Jones Show podcast
    Prison Planet TV
    Infowars.com Twitter
    Alex Jones' Facebook
    Infowars store

BYRON TAU
Politico
June 6, 2012

First lady Michelle Obama tells the Associated Press that she wouldn’t want a federal ban on big sugary drink, but applauds Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s effort to fight obesity:

Asked about Bloomberg’s proposal during an interview with The Associated Press, Mrs. Obama said there’s no “one-size-fits-all” solution for the country’s health challenges. But she said, “We applaud anyone who’s stepping up to think about what changes work in their communities. New York is one example.”

And asked whether the nation’s obesity epidemic warrants taking a more aggressive approach, such as Bloomberg’s, she said: “There are people like Mayor Bloomberg who are, and that is perfectly fine.”

Mrs. Obama later issued a statement saying that she hadn’t intended to weigh in on the Bloomberg plan “one way or the other.”

Full article here

Print
Print this page.

Comment Rules


24 Responses to “Michelle Obama Applauds NYC Soda Ban”

  1. ya, right.

    that fat fucking heffer would not know a good thing if it came up and BIT her on her ginormous ass.

    Now if we had a ban on whole racks of ribs you would get to watch her tear that skinny troll limb from limb in one of her classic “wookie rages”

    Cnsay Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 4:48 am

    BWWWWAAAAHAAAHAAAHA! Trying like hell to get that mental image out of my head of her sucking on a rib bone.

    PhilStapley Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 5:46 am

    Michelle Obama is a direct descendant of Eve from the bible. Look at how she clings on to that rib.

    Or she is the missing link. She is halfway between a human and KoKo the gorilla. Fucking look at her.

    hellangone Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:01 am

    LOL!

    That, and a large sack of fries!

    lock and load Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:47 am

    Can you imagine if Bloomberg would have banned fried chicken , watermelon , or collard greens ?
    She’d loose 10 lbs. everytime barry went to N.Y.C for a fundraiser .

  2. LETS BAN CONTROL FREAK TRAITORS INSTEAD !

    hellangone Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:00 am

    Let’s see now…

    You’re husband is sinking in the polls, he faces certain defeat, he needs SOMETHING to justify his reelection, and YOU mouth off about BANNING extra large “sugary” drinks?!

  3. this woman is an IDIOT!
    come-on , you can’t control the size of a drink. this is lunacy.

    my2cents Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:09 am

    Michelle Obama’s conundrum always you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

  4. so bar’s have to get rid of all there tall glasses. that did not take to much cash to get them now did it. give me a 16oz jack please.

  5. omg michelle obama applauds for soda ? that’s front-page news 🙂

    today it’s soda tomorrow it’s beer after that who knows …

  6. of course she’s cheering,
    its another fascist “law” that NO ONE ever voted for.
    they all LOVE that kinda BS.

  7. what a joke. m. obama’s butt is HUGE.

  8. Mrs. Obama, what a big Diet Soda you have! The better to kill you my dear!

  9. The problem of people over weight is and has been obvious for decades now.Too much sweet foods and drinks????

    cutting down on sugar is one way of resolving the addictive problem. But like war, humans for so many do not have the inner will to take responsability for there actions. and when government tries something, it is seen as the NWO abuse dictatorship?? when reality it could simply be people who care about the over weight problem and the cost on the health system because of no self control on the part of the over weight population???

    Now does that make the people overweight enemies? NO of course not.

    But like global warming, we all know that adding carbon taxes will not stop the warming, thats the fraud of all the Al Gore taxation of the humans to reduce global warming.
    Like with the over weight population, it isn’t by criminalizing overweight people you can resolve that problem. and taxes to discourage the people from bying the poisons will only make the banksters richer, it would be another fraud siguised in a humanitarian intervention???

    sort of living in a world where you are damed if you do, and doomed if you don’t????

    Impossible to satisfy everyone. Imagine how do you satisfy 7 billion?

    Vic Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:22 am

    healthy diet and exercise is the solution. but cutting an addiction like sugar is very hard to acheive, it takes will power from the person who wants to control the weight.

    and so can you force a person to want to care for him or herself? forcefull intervention would be dictatorship no?

    well all depends where people stand? those who see there medicals bills rise or the accessibility to health care slowly destroyed might think that those with a weight problem should take responsability for there own health and live and eat better,healhty food??? but the same fact goes for smokers??? lung cancer has a social cost???
    So can we not see that there needs to be some kind of social discipline? otherwise my freedom ends where your starts??? and if your freedom is too ignore your health, why should I pay for that ? and the opposite is also true???? so here we all are in a ketch 22 type of situation.

    Who wins and who looses? A healthy body is the winning situation, for if one remains healthy ,he is free from the BIG PHARMA shylocks. like no dept = free from owing anyone ,anything. why do you all think they keep us in a matrix of dependancy? the more we are dependent of others, the more we are enslaved.

    captain obvious Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 7:02 am

    sugar is “food”, but HFCS and aspartame are rat poisons.

  10. First it was ciggarettes,
    now soda…

    I’m assuming brewski is up next?

    down with the clown Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:20 am

    they did that and it did not work out so well.

    n33san Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 7:40 am

    I guess then that this is dead before it stood a chance as well?

  11. My god. This woman makes Super Duper Man 1776 seem brilliant.

  12. The First Fat, Stupid, Brain Dead Bitch. Can’t wait till her and her husband are gone and fading away forever.

  13. Banish control freak politicians to the gallows. We’ll need more rope.

  14. So if you want a big drink but can’t buy one, you’d end up just buying two medium-sizes instead, right? Wouldn’t that be even more soda than a large?

    The stupidity of these people is quite staggering. You aren’t going to stop someone from doing what they want to do. Look at the war on drugs and prohibition. That this whole thing was even taken seriously, much less applauded is really… really… stupid.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Michelle Obama Applauds NYC Soda Ban

  • Print

    The Alex Jones Channel
    Alex Jones Show podcast
    Prison Planet TV
    Infowars.com Twitter
    Alex Jones' Facebook
    Infowars store

BYRON TAU
Politico
June 6, 2012

First lady Michelle Obama tells the Associated Press that she wouldn’t want a federal ban on big sugary drink, but applauds Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s effort to fight obesity:

Asked about Bloomberg’s proposal during an interview with The Associated Press, Mrs. Obama said there’s no “one-size-fits-all” solution for the country’s health challenges. But she said, “We applaud anyone who’s stepping up to think about what changes work in their communities. New York is one example.”

And asked whether the nation’s obesity epidemic warrants taking a more aggressive approach, such as Bloomberg’s, she said: “There are people like Mayor Bloomberg who are, and that is perfectly fine.”

Mrs. Obama later issued a statement saying that she hadn’t intended to weigh in on the Bloomberg plan “one way or the other.”

Full article here

Print
Print this page.

Comment Rules


24 Responses to “Michelle Obama Applauds NYC Soda Ban”

  1. ya, right.

    that fat fucking heffer would not know a good thing if it came up and BIT her on her ginormous ass.

    Now if we had a ban on whole racks of ribs you would get to watch her tear that skinny troll limb from limb in one of her classic “wookie rages”

    Cnsay Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 4:48 am

    BWWWWAAAAHAAAHAAAHA! Trying like hell to get that mental image out of my head of her sucking on a rib bone.

    PhilStapley Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 5:46 am

    Michelle Obama is a direct descendant of Eve from the bible. Look at how she clings on to that rib.

    Or she is the missing link. She is halfway between a human and KoKo the gorilla. Fucking look at her.

    hellangone Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:01 am

    LOL!

    That, and a large sack of fries!

    lock and load Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:47 am

    Can you imagine if Bloomberg would have banned fried chicken , watermelon , or collard greens ?
    She’d loose 10 lbs. everytime barry went to N.Y.C for a fundraiser .

  2. LETS BAN CONTROL FREAK TRAITORS INSTEAD !

    hellangone Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:00 am

    Let’s see now…

    You’re husband is sinking in the polls, he faces certain defeat, he needs SOMETHING to justify his reelection, and YOU mouth off about BANNING extra large “sugary” drinks?!

  3. this woman is an IDIOT!
    come-on , you can’t control the size of a drink. this is lunacy.

    my2cents Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:09 am

    Michelle Obama’s conundrum always you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

  4. so bar’s have to get rid of all there tall glasses. that did not take to much cash to get them now did it. give me a 16oz jack please.

  5. omg michelle obama applauds for soda ? that’s front-page news 🙂

    today it’s soda tomorrow it’s beer after that who knows …

  6. of course she’s cheering,
    its another fascist “law” that NO ONE ever voted for.
    they all LOVE that kinda BS.

  7. what a joke. m. obama’s butt is HUGE.

  8. Mrs. Obama, what a big Diet Soda you have! The better to kill you my dear!

  9. The problem of people over weight is and has been obvious for decades now.Too much sweet foods and drinks????

    cutting down on sugar is one way of resolving the addictive problem. But like war, humans for so many do not have the inner will to take responsability for there actions. and when government tries something, it is seen as the NWO abuse dictatorship?? when reality it could simply be people who care about the over weight problem and the cost on the health system because of no self control on the part of the over weight population???

    Now does that make the people overweight enemies? NO of course not.

    But like global warming, we all know that adding carbon taxes will not stop the warming, thats the fraud of all the Al Gore taxation of the humans to reduce global warming.
    Like with the over weight population, it isn’t by criminalizing overweight people you can resolve that problem. and taxes to discourage the people from bying the poisons will only make the banksters richer, it would be another fraud siguised in a humanitarian intervention???

    sort of living in a world where you are damed if you do, and doomed if you don’t????

    Impossible to satisfy everyone. Imagine how do you satisfy 7 billion?

    Vic Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:22 am

    healthy diet and exercise is the solution. but cutting an addiction like sugar is very hard to acheive, it takes will power from the person who wants to control the weight.

    and so can you force a person to want to care for him or herself? forcefull intervention would be dictatorship no?

    well all depends where people stand? those who see there medicals bills rise or the accessibility to health care slowly destroyed might think that those with a weight problem should take responsability for there own health and live and eat better,healhty food??? but the same fact goes for smokers??? lung cancer has a social cost???
    So can we not see that there needs to be some kind of social discipline? otherwise my freedom ends where your starts??? and if your freedom is too ignore your health, why should I pay for that ? and the opposite is also true???? so here we all are in a ketch 22 type of situation.

    Who wins and who looses? A healthy body is the winning situation, for if one remains healthy ,he is free from the BIG PHARMA shylocks. like no dept = free from owing anyone ,anything. why do you all think they keep us in a matrix of dependancy? the more we are dependent of others, the more we are enslaved.

    captain obvious Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 7:02 am

    sugar is “food”, but HFCS and aspartame are rat poisons.

  10. First it was ciggarettes,
    now soda…

    I’m assuming brewski is up next?

    down with the clown Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 6:20 am

    they did that and it did not work out so well.

    n33san Reply:
    June 6th, 2012 at 7:40 am

    I guess then that this is dead before it stood a chance as well?

  11. My god. This woman makes Super Duper Man 1776 seem brilliant.

  12. The First Fat, Stupid, Brain Dead Bitch. Can’t wait till her and her husband are gone and fading away forever.

  13. Banish control freak politicians to the gallows. We’ll need more rope.

  14. So if you want a big drink but can’t buy one, you’d end up just buying two medium-sizes instead, right? Wouldn’t that be even more soda than a large?

    The stupidity of these people is quite staggering. You aren’t going to stop someone from doing what they want to do. Look at the war on drugs and prohibition. That this whole thing was even taken seriously, much less applauded is really… really… stupid.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes