Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966 Goes Much Deeper Than an MI5 Replacement Operation

Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike? Removes Original Reference To Paul’s Death On Google Which Appeared On Ringo Starr’s Personal Facebook Page

TMR Editor’s’s Note: Years prior to the The Millennium Report (TMR) website going online one of our writers conducted exhaustive research into the “Paul McCartney is Dead” conspiracy.  It is, in fact, a real conspiracy because of the number of willing participants who, by necessity, had to participate in it in order for it to be successful for almost fifty years.

However, only one element has been missing over the past 49 years. And that is a member of The BEATLES stepping forward to tell the unvarnished truth. It now appears that this little secret has been finally told by Ringo Starr. Certainly, with the death of his bandmates, except ‘Paul’ of course, the burden of this secret became greater for him to carry alone as the years wore on.

The newsprint piece shown above well captures the respective roles of the 4 BEATLES. What it fails to point out is that Ringo Starr was not only the drummer, he was also the heartbeat of the band as all drummers are.

It now appears that the true story about Paul is Ringo’s to tell or else the heartbeat would become increasingly labored by the sheer weight of the harder-to-hide truth (The internet has a way of doing that, yes?).

There is no one else who has the authority, by virtue of his firsthand experience with the whole wild and crazy affair, like Ringo Starr.

The “exhaustive research” conducted over several years did produce an extraordinary amount of evidence pointing to the great likelihood that the original Paul McCartney did leave The BEATLES circa 1966.  There is now a massive body of forensic proof, anecdotal testimony, scientific photograph assessment, comparative voice analysis, circumstantial evidence, etc. on the internet which supports Ringo Starr’s ‘alleged’ revelations.

The following article appears to be correct in stating all the primary facts with the exception of the very last paragraph as follows:

“The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an imposter could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.”

Surely, it was MI5 which coordinated the entire coverup, since they were best positioned to ensure that the conspiracy of silence would stick for so many years.

As for why The BEATLES agreed to go along with the coverup scheme since 1966 — the answer, especially if you were living during the 1960s and had sisters who could sing every single BEATLES song with perfection, is quite obvious. Paul McCartney’s death would have triggered an unprecedented shock to his millions of young and often delirious female fans around the entire world.

For a much better explanation of just how traumatic such a shocking revelation would have been in 1966, the following true story is presented for the reader’s edification.

“During The BEATLES performance at Shea Stadium, which kicked off their 1965 US Tour, the massive contingent of New York City policemen who were assigned to crowd control reported “rivers of urine” which flowed from the girls and young women in attendance, they were in such genuinely altered states. They were so excited and beside themselves that they were literally ‘unconscious’ to controlling their bodily functions.”

Here’s another take on the fans’ out-of-body excitement and uncontrollable urges:
Did Beatle fans wet their pants at concerts??

13 Aug 1965, Manhattan, New York, New York, USA — 8/13/1965 – New York, NY- New York City policemen try to restrain hordes of teenagers- mostly of the female variety -from crashing into the Warwick Hotel, the Beatles’ New York residence, August 12. The Beatles appear at Shea Stadium August 15, their only New York concert on their current U.S. tour. — Image by © Bettmann/CORBIS

Clearly, MI5, MI6, together with the British Monarchy and Parliament had to make a very swift command decision to hide the death of Paul McCartney.  The following quote from Guitar World’s article titled “Did Paul McCartney Actually Die in 1966?” reveals more of the inside story.

The Replacement Of Paul McCartney — Why? And by Whom?

The article below, as it turns out, was published by a tabloid-styled, faux-journalism website by the name of World News Daily Report.  However, it contains a general narrative regarding the Paul McCartney story which could actually be true … right down to the exact dates and details.

That the real Paul McCartney left the ‘world scene’ on November 9th of 1966 is an absolute certainty for those initiated into this particular line of inquiry and investigation.  Their only questions relate to why MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5) arranged for his removal.  And, exactly who did they replace him with?

Their underlying theory goes like this: Paul McCartney’s 1966 death was the result of an MI5* Black Operation overseen by the Tavistock Institute. The BEATLES, it was understood, had way too much POWER AND INFLUENCE for the British Intelligence Services not to take advantage of it.  How to practically harness such power and influence, however, remained a very difficult task, especially given the indomitable John Lennon and deeply spiritual George Harrison.

*The Security Service, commonly known as MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5), is the United Kingdom’s domestic counter-intelligence and security agency and is part of its intelligence machinery alongside the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS; also known as MI6) focused on foreign threats, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and Defence Intelligence (DI).
(Source: Wikipedia — MI5)

The ‘drug overdose’ death of their first manager — Brian Epstein — in 1967 devastated The  BEATLES, as it was meant to.  His knowledge of Paul’s death led to serious personal problems, as well as posed a hugely unpredictable public issue.  That George Harrison lost his bouts with throat cancer, lung cancer and a brain tumor at the age of 58 are also considered suspect by many.  Then there was John Lennon’s shocking assassination by “Manchurian Candidate” Mark David Chapman at 40 years old which was the direct result of his ardent anti-war stance and incessant world peace message.

The BEATLES Lead The British Invasion Bands

The key piece of this ongoing and originally British musical phenomenon, known as the British Invasion, revolves around the BEATLES, and especially the original Macca — Paul McCartney.  For it was Paul who was the premier singer for the first and most famous of all the British Invasion Bands to invade North America.

In that very special and unique capacity did Paul exert an inordinate degree of influence over a musical era defined as the “Golden Age of Rock” (sometimes labeled the “Golden Age of Modern Music“).

What is not very well known is that throughout the development and evolution of the Rock and Roll Revolution, there were always two sides operating in the background trying hard — VERY hard — to influence the direction … and the content … and the spirit of the movement.

Only by comprehending his role of the mega-Macca[1] in this often covert, multi-decade, Anglo-American operation will the real back story of Paul McCartney be properly understood.  So will the true conspiracy behind his death and coverup, as well as his purposeful replacement.

[1] Macca:

“A person possessing extremely large sex appeal in spite of being a care bear. Possibly the most gorgeous and sexy and cute thing ever invented, better than The Beatles and Darius put together. Also has good taste in music and smells nice.”
 — Urban Dictionary

The following article appeared on a website that is often used to leak truths into the public domain.  Sites like World News Daily Report are utilized to disseminate highly sensitive and secret information in a manner that permits plausible deniability.  While the exact facts surrounding Ringo Starr’s involvement may or may not be true, the background Beatles material certainly fits with the most likely historical narrative.


Source Article from

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Paul McCartney’s Death in 1966 Goes Much Deeper Than an MI5 Replacement Operation”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Google has renewed all of these articles spoken about. They are no longer accessible in America and I don’t know if this is from England.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes