RSS Feed
November 6th, 2015 
Awake Goy The diverse white Americans often forget that everyday defamation and expressions of supremacy are acts of war. Acts to resist defamation are also acts of war, and they are not for the faint of heart, who fear someone may not like them when they speak out, and who want to do airy bloodless graduate seminars on global or presidential issues. Only the daring may apply.
No List of Slurs Necessary
It isn’t necessary to have a list of slurs, it is only necessary to recognize that the speaker or writer is claiming the supremacist authority to slam you with bigoted names and labels when he or she does it. Never get trapped in the hate vocabulary used, and always express existential disgust with anyone from outside your demographic (and sometimes from inside) who seeks to demean or denigrate you or your entire demographic.
Demographic slander includes all naming, labeling, defining, and describing from outside, as well as all the slurs, hate caricatures, and negative stereotypes that make up the anti-white narrative.
Anti-white narrative slurs used in print and electronic media include: white boy, redneck, hillbilly, cracker, white trash, white-bread, shiksa, WASP, Caucasian, lily white, Yankee dog, typical white person, gentile, white bread, goober, Righteous Gentile, white resentment, goyim, acting white, non-Hispanic white, non-Latino white, and Wonder Bread — plus Spanish-language names like guerro, gringo, and anglo, as well as terms like haole.
[Anglo in lower case shows it is used as a demonizing Spanish-language label, not a respectable English-language part of the ethnic name, Anglo-Saxon.]
Anti-white narrative names and labels are based on hateful, bigoted, supremacist, deceptive, and bullying claims that the diverse white Euro-Americans have (a) no diversity, (b) no nationality, (c) no continent of origin, (d) no national or regional origins, and (e) no right to name themselves.
Plant, animal, insect, and food names dehumanize the diverse white Americans just as the use of a color name [“a white”] standing alone can be dehumanizing. Comparing the diverse white American peoples to a cancer or other disease is another popular dehumanization tactic.
American society no longer has a majority demographic throughout the nation, having morphed from involuntary pluralism to coerced multiculturalism and then to politicized multiracialism, but attacking the anti-white narrative is a key to reversing defensiveness and silence by the diverse white American peoples.
Slurs
A slur is a name, label, definition, or description imposed on the diverse white Americans to silence them. Gringo and goyim are examples. These names always deny the diversity and the nationality of the diverse white Americans.
Hate Caricatures
A hate caricature is a portrayal constructed with descriptions, films, cartoons, and fictional characters to picture white Euro-Americans in a hateful way. “Beavis ‘n’ Butt-head” and “Archie Bunker” are examples. The March on Skokie and Black Churches Burning are other examples.
Negative Stereotypes
A negative stereotype is a generalization about the diverse white European Americans that demeans or dehumanizes them to smother their diversity and nationality, and to silence them. “Typical white person” and “acting white” are examples.
Why Attackback
It is important to reduce the negative impact that the anti-white narrative is having on the lives of the diverse white American youth from whom knowledge of European and American histories, cultures, origins, and diversities has been stripped, in favor of an anti-white narrative by the likes of Howard Zinn, Jane Elliott, and Noel Ignatiev.
The diverse white American youth are confronted with bullying by name-calling (“acting white”) and supremacist aspersions against their ancestors’ diversity (“a typical white person”) on the school bus, on the sidewalk, on television, in films, in classrooms, on playing fields, and by politicians. Any name or label is a supremacist act if offered by the other.
But the diverse white American youth do have the right to a decent sense of self-respect (something different from “white pride”), and the right to name and define themselves. And we adults need to make this crystal clear to the leaders of the campaign of defamation in the dominant media culture, the corporate entertainment culture, the textbook industry, the leading political caste (you know who), and educational institutions.
And Speaking of Harm
Consider recent news that middle-aged white American men are dying off more quickly than any other demographic. Clearly the butt-crack jokes about hard-working blue-collar white men on sit coms along with Jewish TV Producer Norman Lear’s portrayals of middle-aged blue-collar white men (i.e., Archie Bunker) are a powerful element in the die-off of these wonderful people.
Source Article from http://renegadetribune.com/resisting-defamation-as-an-act-of-war-part-1/
Posted in 
Tags: 
