February 25, 2016
“Traditionally, the scales of justice are depicted as awaiting the weight of the evidence. A preponderance on one side or the other will tip them to a just conclusion. Indeed, this is the ideal to which we still aspire. Unfortunately, it is rarely found today in our courts. If an attorney finds that the weight of evidence is tipping the scales against his client, he immediately employs one of the myriad techniques of “civil procedure” to have that evidence declared inadmissible, to have his opponent’s witnesses impeached or found incompetent, and to mount a counterattack of his own to tip the scales back to favor his client. This technique is called “practicing law.” Like any other skill, it is honed by constant practice, but this skill depends heavily on its practitioner’s willingness to employ any subterfuge on his client’s behalf. It is as though a football game were being played during which the players were allowed to commit any unsportsmanlike or illegal act in order to gain a point, with the umpire (that is, the judge), actually cooperating in and officially approving the illegal conduct. In legal parlance, this has a name; it is known as “professional courtesy,” because the judge, like the lawyers, is also a member of the bar.”
Source Article from http://henrymakow.com/2016/02/rich-jews-bullied-me-2.html
Related posts:
Lockdown surrender? Sweden warns of more restrictions, gears up to close restaurants & gyms
U.S. Congress Quietly Passes Controversial CLOUD Act
Walmart hired weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin to spy on employees using human trafficking softw...
Fajr Jam Co. exports 6.7 m/b condensates to East Asia
MIT Historian Suing CIA For Transparency On Nelson Mandela
2.5K asylum-seekers 'disappear' from Finnish reception centers - report