Ron Paul focuses on anti-abortion rights position in new ad

October 15th, 2011

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Stephanie Condon
CBSNEWS
Friday, October 14, 2011

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul is airing a new ad in key primary states that ignores his well-known libertarian views on issues like foreign policy and instead focuses on his social conservatism — namely, his strong views opposing abortion.

Full story here.

Print this page.

Comment Rules

32 Responses to “Ron Paul focuses on anti-abortion rights position in new ad”

Dr. Paul Opposes Abortion Like He Opposes MASS MURDER OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION…

BUT, THIS IS THE ‘ENDGAME’, NOT ‘SCRABBLE’.

QMB
life, liberty,
the pursuit of
happiness

Startover Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 8:56 am

Not scrabble? hahaha
Not scrabble? thats a good one…

clamlicker69 Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 3:28 pm

Power2ThePeaceful says:

October 14, 2011 at 7:53 am
“We Are The 99%”

cleanitup says:
October 14, 2011 at 7:00 am
I think this is hilarious. The longer the protesters are there, the harder it is to take them seriously. Really, does anyone think these people care about keeping the park clean? The don’t even keep themselves clean. Not showering, doing drugs and fornicating under tarps on the sidewalk, while wearing/holding signs that are supposed to make some kind of point?

doing drugs and fornicating under tarps

fornicating under tarps

fornicating

fornicating fornicating fornicating

doing drugs and fornicating

under tarps

“We Are The 99%”

doing drugs and fornicating

“We Are The 99%”

doing drugs and fornicating reconscoutsniper doing drugs and fornicating

reconscoutsniper doing drugs and fornicating

under tarps

Doctor Zhivago Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 12:05 pm

So, your saying that Ron opposes death?

Death of life.
Death of liberty.

Wa’ yea, that is like, why he’s the leader of “The Real Thing”, which isnt Coke–its the American Family.
I’d trade medical abortions for marijuana legalization any day, and I love abortions.
Umm, Really?? How bout worry about those who are already alive and being murdered donkey, besides, only women can give birth or abort, so this isn’t a mans decision, so shut the fukc up ronny! Way more problems than this!!!
Soon masterbating is gonna be illegal because your killing your sperm, vote Ron, he approves this message!
wow, i guess the trolls are out early this morning…..life is precious, period.
WRONG……..I favor you Ron Paul and I want you to win, but women are who you need to gather into your camp and the majority of them view this as a ‘womens’ issue. I kind of disagree, and think abortions are way overdone…….but Sir, you are running for national politiclal and need to control your message…………..I don’t know who is running your campaign, but when you lead it with a commercial glorifying Ron Reagan, who is really a very controversial figure, and follow that with an anti-abortion commercial you are preaching to the small congregation you already have and turning off a big segment of the population with both messages. Believe me this campaign will get dirty and you need some handlers who think about these things!!!!!!!!!

BiGpharmakillZ Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 12:11 pm

He is speaking for the VATICAN!!!
Not a good idea,
Many of the Occupy Wall Street/well meaning leftist are for abortion or are neutral. This will turn them off of Ron Paul.

exexpat11 Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

My thoughts also. This is a “Third Rail” topic that will get you thrown in with crazy Michele Bachmann if you aren’t careful.

exexpat11 Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 4:32 pm

I made the statement before I watched the ad. It was done very tastefully (unlike many Right to Life ads have been).

I still don’t think it needed to be said though. He is a Doctor with strong Christian beliefs so I kind of already knew where he stood on the issue.

Paul needs to get his mainstream message out there! Quickly! Limit Government! Save America first!
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness….. unless your irresponsible mother wants to rip your head off and shred your body to save herself.

Sounds to me like Ron is a strict libertarian. He is just on the side of the unborn person.
Also… has anybody else ever wondered if the solution to any of the earth’s greatest problems wasn’t killed along with a genious in a random womb????

bornready Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 10:55 am

*genius lol
I don’t understand liberals at all. You guys want to save animals and death row inmates but not babies. And conservatives are supposed to be capitalist, corporate money worshipers but they want to save the babies. I’m a libertarian so I don’t want anyone telling me what to do but at the same time when do the rights begin?

Also, if abortion weren’t an option I bet there would be a lot less “accidents”. The morning after pill is at walgreen’s. Maybe skip the next i-whatever and take care of your problem IMMEDIATELY!
Ron Paul would have gotten my vote and the vote of all my female friends…except for this stand.
We women are fed up with the War on Women…so this was a BIG mistake on his part.
We all plan to canvess and speak out against the War on Women big time…the ladies are pissed…

Mad Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

WE women!? Speak for yourself, Winyan. You think tossing a living baby into a bucket is okay? You and your feminist friends are fed up with the War on Women, but give an enthusiastic thumbs up to the War on Babies. Do you honestly think Dr. Paul is anti-abortion because he wants to control and subdue all womankind? Do you think that perhaps he champions the rights of the most helpless and voiceless among us?

So who ARE you going to vote for now? Some hypocrite who supports abortion while sending more troops to kill and die in foreign interventionist wars?
This was a mistake!
Nobody wants to hear about dead babies in buckets. He should have fired his campaign manager after the 2008 fiasco, The President can do nothing about Roe vs. Wade anyway, so why bring this up?
There were many ‘conservative views’ he could have brought to light rather than this one.
Huge Mistake!

Mad Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 4:25 pm

What 2008 fiasco? Ron Paul raised more grassroots money than any other candidate. It wasn’t his fault that the elections are controlled by the elite establishment.

If you don’t want to hear about dead babies in buckets, then don’t support the pro-abortion agenda!
Excuse me, the “pro-choice” agenda… but I’m wondering what choice the baby has.
It’s no wonder we’re murdering innocent people in so many other countries; so many here don’t even have a problem murdering their own ! Ron Paul is a TRUE MAN of PRINCIPLE; that’s a trait this country has been missing in Washington for many,many years…………….RON PAUL 2012 !
Abortions are for irresponsible sluts, adoption at least give the kid a chance, or just take the fucking pill, sick fucks.
OH some of you can’t see what is happening here.

This is going to be full out war on Christians, and RP is leading the way. He is working for the Vatican and just look up RP and the John Birch Society and the Vatican!

This is all part of the divide and conquer. Mark my words, you are falling into the traps by choosing a side.
Most of the women I know feel just like you do, so Ron Paul is not wise to put this issue out front no matter how he feels personally. Abortion is such a complex question, that it is better left alone. I frankly am militantly neutral on abortion, which means I’m tired of both sides making unfair and silly arguments. I am militantly neutral because I see two very different issues where you had for instance a young teenage girl raped by a relative and a medical study showed the baby was likely to be born horribly deformed at great risk to the mother versus a case where somebody decides 9 month into a pregnancy that a baby would be inconvenient and they do a partial birth abortion and have to basically kill a full term ‘fetus’ that already very viable. I think abortion should be rare and very regulated, with many options for expectant mothers including a large cash fee from the many childless couples that would happily pay to adopt an infant. So there you have my opinion. Very complex and difficult as is the whole issue. But I know that most women claim a right to do what they want with their bodies and I would not take my stand, much less Ron Paul’s stand, if I was a serious candidate for President. And as one other poster has said, I think he should fire the majority of his campaign staffers, who are coming up with these ideas. He need to stay on point, which is the economy, the war issues, and the fleecing of America.

Mad Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 4:46 pm

You are right about abortion being an insurmountably complex issue, akat. There needs to be allowances made for child pregnancies, rape, incest and endangerment, but so many abortions are made simply for the convenience of the woman. I know women and even married couples who “just weren’t ready for a child yet.” ?! Not ready to give up their busy social life or to deal with this hiccup in their career plans, so they kill the developing child!

I also agree that making this statement was not the best career move because, unlike his stand on other issues, he hasn’t told us what he would DO about the abortion epidemic as president. Anything he comes up with is going to raise hackles on a significant number of voters.
MArk my words Abortion is MURDER. That’s not an opinion. Go watch one if you think not. This is a huge part of the reason this country WILL FALL ! There is a moral code that smells of being extremely immoral.

BiGpharmakillZ Reply:
October 14th, 2011 at 2:21 pm

True that.
With Ron Paul, you know what you are getting. No hidden agenda. He won’t flip flop, tell you what you want to hear. He’s our last chance. I think we are in the end game. If the people of this country consciously choose a leader who will continue the status quo, knowing what we know now and experiencing what we have, then we deserve our fates. If this happens, then Lord, please make a way of escape for me and those who are precious in my sight. Amen.
He was a kind of solution to this misery, but obviously he is not interesting in the job. He already collected enough money and it is time to say goodbye. I thought this time would continue till the end, he presented himself with more confidence than previous time but I was wrong.
So Mr. Paul if you teenage daughter got pregnant accidentally and she didn’t want to become a mother what would you do or others people daughters for example?
Can you force Parenthood on someone ?
shame on you, dr. Paul. Who are you to decide when pople find it necessary to give up on a child to not give them that freedom. we here in holland have given the rights to the women to what they want to decide, not some politician.
for example women who are raped should be given the right to abort if they are pregnant. and for the rest, i think of the child and what you are doing to him/her. an unwanted baby who will be tormented for life, because some mothers aren’t capable of taking care of a child, psychological or financially.
all because of ‘god’ told you so, women and children should suffer, sounds alot like bible-taliban to me……