RSPCA PERVERSION

The following is reproduced from one of our fellow fighters on an Austrailian anti RSPCA site;;

I agree with many of the points which you are trying to make – in the UK there are cases like Attorney-General v RSPCA (where the RSPCA were found to have perverted the course of justice and got fined for doing so) and RSPCA v Cruden (where they were found to have presented a dishonest case but their advocate is now a judge hearing these cases). However, publishing a stream of consciousness without particularity does not do sufficient credit to the work you undoubtedly put in. Insane statements like “the RSPCA have more power than the police” and “The RSPCA can have transcripts of Court Hearings altered” and “are able to gain complete acceptance from the Magistrate in Court for their fabrications of evidence, intimidation of witnesses and perjured evidence” is bonkers. When you say “The Magistrate when asked, when he would charge the witness with perjury said he would consider the provable lies of RSPCA witnesses. RSPCA provable perjury (lies) were considered as facts by Magistrates”. Who was this magistrate and what did (s)he do about this “provable lies” – when did this happen. “Who, what, when where, why, how, with what result?”

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes