Sen. Ron Johnson and Firefighters Reignite 9/11 Controlled Demolition Debate, But Who and Why? Bush “Neocons” Discussed “New Pearl Harbor”

May 2nd, 2025

aW3aO7lN9v

In case you missed it:

Major Firefighters Professional Journal Supports Sen. Ron Johnson, Says 9/11 Was “Explosive Demolition” Johnson Calls for New Investigation

9/11 Truthers are rapidly revealing the impossible physics of the official story. Central among these is the idea of “pancake collapse,” in which collapsing floors in a skyscraper accumulate irresistibly and force a skyscraper to come down. The theory is a unicorn. The next question is not far behind: who, and why?

If 9/11 was a so-called “inside job,” it is reasonable to ask who would do such a thing, and for what reasons?

That’s the easy part. If there is anything that marks greatly evil minds, it is hubris, and the belief that one is so vastly superior and more intelligent than the ordinary person, that there is no need to cover all tracks. In fact many serial killers historically have enjoyed playing cat-and-mouse with police, leaving ample clues, confident that justice will never be served.

The main architects of the Iraq Invasion of 2003 for years made no secret of their desire to overthrow Saddam Hussein, by military force if necessary. Saddam was definitely not in the Western financial or military orbit, was the only Arab country to lob real, live SCUD missiles at Israel during Gulf War I.

Even more helpfully, the most powerful men in the world, able to mobilize the greatest land army on Earth for such an audacious undertaking, mentioned, almost in passing, that “a new Pearl Harbor” might be a prerequisite for realizing their goals.

ABC News reported in March 2003 in “Were 1998 Memos a Blueprint for War?”

“Years before George W. Bush entered the White House, and years before the Sept. 11 attacks set the direction of his presidency, a group of influential neo-conservatives hatched a plan to get Saddam Hussein out of power.

The group, the Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, was founded in 1997. Among its supporters were three Republican former officials who were sitting out the Democratic presidency of Bill Clinton: Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz.

In open letters to Clinton and GOP congressional leaders the next year, the group called for “the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power” and a shift toward a more assertive U.S. policy in the Middle East, including the use of force if necessary to unseat Saddam…”

Although they were not former soldiers but largely tweed-coat academics, the PNAC-ers seemed to see themselves as Olympian gods, changing the course of history. One said to a reporter “We will act and you will study what we did, and when you are done we will have acted again and you will study that…”

[Project for a New American Century]

One of the areas of 9/11 with the most unanswered questions is the air defense “stand-down,” or failure to act, in the face of airliners which flew around the country for hours unmolested, by a military which routinely put fighter jets outside the wings of planes which were lost or disoriented within minutes.

At top speeds of nearly three times the speed of sound, war planes close in on slow commercial aircraft like they are standing still.

The issue is key. It would require people high up in the government to artfully sabotage the nation’s air defenses. On 9/11, the people who wrote of “a new Pearl Harbor” were the government.

One of the key resources for studying 9/11 is 911Research.wtc7.net. The encyclopedic website writes in a section “Air Defenses”:

“For the first few days after the attack, the official story was that no interceptors were scrambled until after the Pentagon strike. On September 16th Vice President Cheney told Meet the Press that George Bush personally made the decision to scramble interceptors, and suggested that he did so only after the Pentagon was hit. 1 General Myers, during his confirmation hearing on September 13th, said that no military aircraft were scrambled until after the Pentagon was hit. 2 There was also no mention in the major media of scramblings of jets prior to the Pentagon hit, until September 14th, when Dan Rather announced on the CBS Evening News that F-15s were scrambled from Otis at 8:44 and F-16s were scrambled from Langley at 9:30. 3 Officials such as Cheney apparently were not kept apprised of these new “facts,” since his Meet the Press interview was two days later. Four days after the CBS disclosure, the new story was incorporated into NORAD’s official timeline.

The official timeline was changed again with the release of the 9/11 Commission Report. The differences between the NORAD and Commission timelines are graphically summarized on the timelines pages…”

And in a section “NORAD Stand-Down , The Prevention of Interceptions of the Commandeered Planes “:

“It is standard operating procedure (SOP) to scramble jet fighters whenever a jetliner goes off course or radio contact with it is lost. Between September 2000 and June 2001, interceptors were scrambled 67 times. 1 In the year 2000 jets were scrambled 129 times. 2

There are several elements involved in domestic air defense. The air traffic control system continuously monitors air traffic and notifies NORAD of any deviations of any aircraft from their flight-paths or loss of radio contact. NORAD monitors air and space traffic continuously and is prepared to react immediately to threats and emergencies. It has the authority to order units from the Air National Guard, the Air Force, or other armed services to scramble fighters in pursuit of jetliners in trouble.

Routine interception procedures were not followed on September 11th, 2001.”

In “Failures to Scramble”:

“No plausible explanation has been provided for failing to scramble interceptors in a timely fashion from bases within easy range to protect the September 11th targets. Fighters that were dispatched were scrambled from distant bases. Early in the attack, when Flight 11 had turned directly south toward New York City, it was obvious that New York City and the World Trade Center, and Washington D.C. would be likely targets. Yet fighters were not scrambled from the bases near the targets. They were only scrambled from distant bases. Moreover there were no redundant or backup scrambles…

“No interceptors were scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base to protect the capital, at least not before the Pentagon was hit. Andrews Air Force Base had two squadrons of fighters on alert, and is only about 10 miles from the Pentagon.”

US Senator Ron Johnson calls for a new 9/11 investigation

Gateway Pundit: “Senator Ron Johnson Links WTC Building 7 to 9/11 ‘Cover-Up’, Demands New Investigation Into the Attacks”

“Senator Ron Johnson is urging Congress to reopen the investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, focusing in particular on the unexplained collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, which was never hit by an aircraft and remains, in his view, deeply suspect.

In an explosive new interview that’s turning heads and raising eyebrows, Johnson, known for his America First positions and alignment with President Trump, tore into the official narrative and pointed fingers at what he calls a “corrupt” investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Speaking to conservative commentator Benny Johnson, the Wisconsin senator stated, “Let’s start with Building 7. I don’t know if you can find any building engineers—except those who held the corrupt investigation at NIST—who would say it crashed in some other way than through a controlled demolition.”

Johnson, who leads the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is demanding answers and calling out what he sees as a blatant cover-up.

“You’re talking about molten steel. Just watch the footage. Listen to the documentary Bravo 7, put together by New York firefighters. There are a lot of questions. Who ordered the removal and destruction of all evidence? That’s completely contrary to every investigative procedure we have for fire scenes. Who gave that order?”

Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was “Explosive Demolition”

“In the videos of the collapse of WTC 7, it descends for the first 2.5 seconds at the acceleration of gravity, also known as “freefall.” If the falling material encounters any resistance whatsoever, it will fall at a slower rate. All three visible corners of WTC 7, and several other points along the roofline, over a span of 328 ft. (100 m), were measured to transition instantly from full support to freefall simultaneously within 0.2 seconds. The perimeter walls fall straight down without tipping, and the building falls symmetrically within its own footprint. Under what circumstances have you seen this pattern of collapse previously?

Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition. Freefall continued for about 2.5 seconds, equivalent to removal of all support columns over 8 floors, low in the building. This could not have been a pancake collapse because pancaking of floors would produce a series of jolts that would slow the rate of descent. The only way for the upper floors to accelerate uniformly downward through the building is for ALL of the underlying support columns to be removed simultaneously.”

Some Anomalies

– Illegally and confoundingly for the most unique and deadly engineering failures in building history, 95% of the steel evidence

– the steel debris from the buildings – was hastily removed from Ground Zero and shipped to China to be melted, per the orders of NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Normal fire disaster protocol requires that evidence be preserved so that reconstruction of the sequence of events can be attempted.

– Rigid, extensively cross-braced steel-framed skyscrapers cannot fall at free-fall acceleration in seconds, without all main supports being cut at nearly the same time by explosive charges. There is no such thing as a “pancake collapse” in which floors accumulate irresistibly and force a skyscraper to come down. A collapsed floor would meet enormous resistance from the cross-braced steel frame below, most of which was undamaged in the Towers and WTC7 not hit by a plane.

– Commercial airline jet fuel, “Jet A” is essentially kerosene and burns no hotter in open air.

– The majority of the steel can be seen as cleanly-cut sections of beam, strewn across the entire WTC complex, with pieces embedded as by explosive force in buildings far away. The official theory says heat caused all three buildings to collapse, which would lead one to expect heat-deformed piles of steel heaped at the bases of the buildings. (See: “9/11: How it Was Done: the Science of Demolition” Aerial Image of Ground Zero 12 days after 9/11 )

– The concrete from the towers and WTC7 was all pulverized to dust, not in chunks, the result of great energy output far greater than the force of gravity.

– Great quantities of molten steel were found in the bases of towers, which require forgery-like temperatures far higher than can be reached by open-air, non-forced oxygen fires.- WTC owner Larry Silverstein, his son, and his daughter, against their established habits all missed work at their offices in the North Tower that day.

– Multiple war games had eviscerated the nation’s air defenses over the Eastern Seaboard that day.

– Not an anomaly, but of great interest, is the Bush Jr foreign policy team’s long-held desire for “regime change” in Iraq, which, in an influential paper under the guise of the group Project for a New American Century, held that an event like a “new Pearl Harbor” might be needed to mobilize American public opinion in support of what amounted to an invasion of Iraq. The paper was entitled, interestingly, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” even though the US had seen nothing but growth in its enormous military budget since Ronald Reagan.

Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job – “Calling Out Bravo-7” Documentary

NOAA satellite photo taken 12 days after 9/11, before major clean-up operations had begun. Note cleanly cut steel beams thrown long distances across entire WTC complex. Largest detail photo HERE.