RSS Feed
April 2nd, 2015 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda 
Smoke Bombs used to Create Realism in the Germanwings Crash Hoax
In the drill known as the Germanwings suicide “purposeful” crash were smoke bombs used to simulate actual fire to create a sense of realism? Upon close inspection this is precisely what appears to be the case. It is not smoldering plane parts – not in the least. There is no char to justify that. Nor is there any blackish-colored smoke, as would be expected from residual burning jet fuel or even the burning of other hydrocarbons such as the plastics, cushions, and other of the plane parts.
Notice where the smoke is seen and from where it is arising. It is in the gullies and ravines, areas where smoke bombs could easily have been planted. In contrast, as a rule that smoke is not seen on the slopes or peaks: with one exception.
Notice the trail from the ground upward, that is up the gully. That’s the gravitational evolution of smoke bombs, not smoke from actual smoldering fires.
There is no visible wreckage to be seen. Then, how can that be real burning airliner parts? That smoke snakes about, just like the smoke being liberated from pyrotechnic smoke canisters. Moreover, it appears that these were either placed there, manually, or dropped there from psyops/drill helicopters.
It’s the same white smoke as seen from known pyrotechnic fakes.
The smoke originates from the area at which the canister is dropped, rising into the air.
See how they originate from nowhere with a starter plume, a thinner plume, then graduating to larger? How are they different to any degree?
This would explain the behavior of the purported relatives, who are found smiling, smirking, over-acting, faking it as if crying, and behaving as if not in shock or grief to the least. It explains it. This is a hoax, a mere stage. No one died; there was no plane crash. It’s all fabricated, with a rather elaborate though inane attempt to create realism.
As a rule the color of smoldering fires from real airliner crashes is a different color, darker, more grey or even greyish-black:
Moreover, when a plane crashes into a mountainside there is fire, and thus there is char:
S-2T air tanker crash
Look at the amount of black and blackish-grey smoke. Why is there no such smoke from the crash of a massive jet airliner?
Too, in the crash of this F/A-18 Hornet jet there is smoke which is not white in color but is instead grey:
Notice the amount of char on the wreckage from a relatively small jet holding much less fuel than that held by an Airbus 320. In all cases there is wreckage that is associated with the fire.
Though muddy and filthy there is no burn effect on any of the Germanwings wreckage:
Where is the charring that would be expected from the detonation of all that highly volatile jet fuel, which would have caused an explosion on impact with the mountain slopes?
Why is none of this material burnt up?
There is, in fact, not the slightest evidence of any actual jet fuel fires, which would have caused considerable burning and char, not just of the airline components but also of the surrounding area, including the grasses and wood.
In this runway overshoot crash in China the difference is highly evident. Notice what happened to the aluminum fuselage as well as the paint:
The aluminum is actually melted. This is not the case in any of the wreckage seen in the French Alps crash hoax?
REAL Vs. FAKE
The Germanwings staged plane components are free of all char and all evidence of melted metal as well as corroded or burnt off paint.
This is final confirmation. This is a hoax. There was no crash of a Germanwings plane in the French Alps, Mar. 24, 2015. Didn’t happen, not in the least, fully proven, here.
Credit to our posters for sizing this one up immediately.
Source Article from http://nodisinfo.com/smoke-bombs-used-to-create-realism-in-the-germanwings-crash-hoax/
Views: 0
Posted in 
