Supreme Court Dockets Income Tax Challenge

October 22nd, 2012

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Drake advised that Federal taxes will be eliminated after The Event at some point—but not some of the State taxes. Income tax is a Federal tax and it looks like it’s legality is being called into question. Anything unconstitutional will go the way of the do-do bird.

A Colorado man’s challenge to the IRS says that wages don’t count.

The government calls those who argue that the income tax has no legal foundation, “tax protesters” and labels their arguments “frivolous.” And usually
judges toss their arguments out of court, and assess them court costs on top of taxes, interest and penalties; and sometimes even threaten them if they
file further cases.

But now the U.S. Supreme Court — the nine judges who sit on the bench in Washington by virtue of their selection by presidents and confirmation by the
U.S. Senate — has docketed exactly that type of case. (also page 3)

No. 12-6169
Jeffrey Thomas Maehr, Petitioner
v.
Commission of Internal Revenue
Docketed: September 11, 2012

The results? Who knows, considering the radical arguments offered by the pro se plaintiff, Jeffrey Thomas Maehr, a Colorado chiropractor who has been
involved in a number of business ventures, including PureHealthSystems.

Among Maehr’s contentions is that while the government has the legal authority to tax, the Internal Revenue Service has used “unlawful, unconstitutional, unfair and biased” manipulations to assess income taxes on that which is not income – essentially salaries and wages.

Basing his argument on 10 years’ worth of research into tax law, he concludes that salaries and wages are the result of the mutual agreement
among participants to exchange labor for money – and that’s not income.

Income, he said, is the increased value of an asset, such as interest on money in a bank account, which can be subjected to income tax.

He says his arguments repeatedly have been tossed from courthouses —in his case, nine times over the years — and he’s anxious to see what the
Supreme Court justices may decide.

Read the rest of the article…