Syria: Britain, US and France in urgent talks on arming rebels

Added urgency was provided by the disclosure from David Cameron that rebel
groups affiliated to al-Qaeda “have attempted to acquire” chemical weapons
for use in Syria, citing briefings from British intelligence.

The US announcement that it would be sending military aid to the rebels,
including communications equipment, logistical support and – according to
some officials – light weapons and ammunition, has sharply upped the ante on
Syria.

Reports from The Times on Friday night claimed that 300 US Marines have
already been deployed to northern Jordan, along with a Patriot anti-aircraft
missile, ahead of plans to arm the rebels.

The Kremlin, which has backed the regime diplomatically and militarily and
ignored months of Western entreaties to use their influence to rein in Mr
Assad, reacted
with derision to Washington’s finding that Syria had used chemical weapons
.

US President Barack Obama has numerous problematic options to deal with
over Syria.

“What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us,” said
Yuri Ushakov, President Vladimir Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, before
comparing the findings to the US intelligence dossiers on Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction.

Syria also predictably scorned the US findings, accusing the White House of
making “a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria
based on fabricated information”, according to a foreign ministry official
quoted by the state news agency SANA.

“The United States is using cheap tactics to justify President Barack Obama’s
decision to arm the Syrian opposition,” he added.

In Washington, Senator John McCain said the increased US support for the
Syrian opposition was woefully inadequate, accusing President Barack Obama
of “insane” and “disgraceful” inaction amid the massacre of 93,000 people.

“For us to sit by, and watch these people being massacred, raped, tortured, in
the most terrible fashion, meanwhile the Russians are all in, Hizbollah is
all-in, and we’re talking about giving them light weapons? It’s insane. And
let me just tell you it is turning into a regional conflict, not just a
conflict within Syria.

“Does anybody believe today that Bashar al-Assad is bound to fall? Of course
not. It’s disgraceful, the conduct of the United States in sitting by and
watching this happen.”

Mr Putin and Mr Obama are to meet on the sidelines of the G8 at Lough Erne,
ostensibly to discuss how to resuscitate the Geneva peace proposals which is
increasingly being overtaken by events on the ground. Fighting around the
suburbs of Aleppo was reported to be “at its most violent in months”,
according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group.

Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama

Europe remains divided over how best to assist the rebels, with Angela Merkel,
the German chancellor, calling for “urgent discussions” at the UN Security
Council over how to bring all sides to the so-called Geneva II peace process
announced in Moscow in May.

Sweden opposed the US move to provide greater military support. Carl Bildt,
the foreign minister, warned that the US decision could set off an arms race
with Russia, which is already considering whether to supply its advanced
S300 air defence systems. “I don’t think the way forward is to get an arms
race going in Syria,” he said, “There’s a risk that that would undermine the
conditions for a political process.”

A photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA – a Syrian man
who suffered an alleged chemical attack at Khan al-Assal village is treated
in hospital

Gen Salim Idris, the commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, welcomed the US
pledge of further support. “We hope to have the weapons and ammunition that
we need in the near future,” he told Al-Arabiya TV. “This will surely
reflect positively on the rebels’ morale.”

Downing Street said “no decision had been taken” on whether Britain – which
pushed for the ending of an EU arms embargo last month – should join the US
in arming the opposition fighters.

The option of enforcing a limited no-fly zone to protect rebel training bases
in Jordan, is also being considered, according to US officials. However, the
French government indicated that it would be almost impossible to secure the
necessary international agreements.

A Free Syrian Army fighter pointing his weapon in the old city of
Aleppo, Syria.

US officials also played down the possibility, despite the deployment of
Patriot missile and aircraft to Jordan in recent weeks, warning of “great
and open-ended costs for the United States and the international community”.

Asked about a no-fly zone, Downing Street said “nothing was off the table”.

Source Article from http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568301/s/2d4ed8ab/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Cmiddleeast0Csyria0C10A1219210CSyria0EBritain0EUS0Eand0EFrance0Ein0Eurgent0Etalks0Eon0Earming0Erebels0Bhtml/story01.htm

Views: 0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Syria: Britain, US and France in urgent talks on arming rebels

Added urgency was provided by the disclosure from David Cameron that rebel
groups affiliated to al-Qaeda “have attempted to acquire” chemical weapons
for use in Syria, citing briefings from British intelligence.

The US announcement that it would be sending military aid to the rebels,
including communications equipment, logistical support and – according to
some officials – light weapons and ammunition, has sharply upped the ante on
Syria.

Reports from The Times on Friday night claimed that 300 US Marines have
already been deployed to northern Jordan, along with a Patriot anti-aircraft
missile, ahead of plans to arm the rebels.

The Kremlin, which has backed the regime diplomatically and militarily and
ignored months of Western entreaties to use their influence to rein in Mr
Assad, reacted
with derision to Washington’s finding that Syria had used chemical weapons
.

US President Barack Obama has numerous problematic options to deal with
over Syria.

“What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us,” said
Yuri Ushakov, President Vladimir Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, before
comparing the findings to the US intelligence dossiers on Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction.

Syria also predictably scorned the US findings, accusing the White House of
making “a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria
based on fabricated information”, according to a foreign ministry official
quoted by the state news agency SANA.

“The United States is using cheap tactics to justify President Barack Obama’s
decision to arm the Syrian opposition,” he added.

In Washington, Senator John McCain said the increased US support for the
Syrian opposition was woefully inadequate, accusing President Barack Obama
of “insane” and “disgraceful” inaction amid the massacre of 93,000 people.

“For us to sit by, and watch these people being massacred, raped, tortured, in
the most terrible fashion, meanwhile the Russians are all in, Hizbollah is
all-in, and we’re talking about giving them light weapons? It’s insane. And
let me just tell you it is turning into a regional conflict, not just a
conflict within Syria.

“Does anybody believe today that Bashar al-Assad is bound to fall? Of course
not. It’s disgraceful, the conduct of the United States in sitting by and
watching this happen.”

Mr Putin and Mr Obama are to meet on the sidelines of the G8 at Lough Erne,
ostensibly to discuss how to resuscitate the Geneva peace proposals which is
increasingly being overtaken by events on the ground. Fighting around the
suburbs of Aleppo was reported to be “at its most violent in months”,
according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group.

Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama

Europe remains divided over how best to assist the rebels, with Angela Merkel,
the German chancellor, calling for “urgent discussions” at the UN Security
Council over how to bring all sides to the so-called Geneva II peace process
announced in Moscow in May.

Sweden opposed the US move to provide greater military support. Carl Bildt,
the foreign minister, warned that the US decision could set off an arms race
with Russia, which is already considering whether to supply its advanced
S300 air defence systems. “I don’t think the way forward is to get an arms
race going in Syria,” he said, “There’s a risk that that would undermine the
conditions for a political process.”

A photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA – a Syrian man
who suffered an alleged chemical attack at Khan al-Assal village is treated
in hospital

Gen Salim Idris, the commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, welcomed the US
pledge of further support. “We hope to have the weapons and ammunition that
we need in the near future,” he told Al-Arabiya TV. “This will surely
reflect positively on the rebels’ morale.”

Downing Street said “no decision had been taken” on whether Britain – which
pushed for the ending of an EU arms embargo last month – should join the US
in arming the opposition fighters.

The option of enforcing a limited no-fly zone to protect rebel training bases
in Jordan, is also being considered, according to US officials. However, the
French government indicated that it would be almost impossible to secure the
necessary international agreements.

A Free Syrian Army fighter pointing his weapon in the old city of
Aleppo, Syria.

US officials also played down the possibility, despite the deployment of
Patriot missile and aircraft to Jordan in recent weeks, warning of “great
and open-ended costs for the United States and the international community”.

Asked about a no-fly zone, Downing Street said “nothing was off the table”.

Source Article from http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568301/s/2d4ed8ab/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Cmiddleeast0Csyria0C10A1219210CSyria0EBritain0EUS0Eand0EFrance0Ein0Eurgent0Etalks0Eon0Earming0Erebels0Bhtml/story01.htm

Views: 0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Syria: Britain, US and France in urgent talks on arming rebels

Added urgency was provided by the disclosure from David Cameron that rebel
groups affiliated to al-Qaeda “have attempted to acquire” chemical weapons
for use in Syria, citing briefings from British intelligence.

The US announcement that it would be sending military aid to the rebels,
including communications equipment, logistical support and – according to
some officials – light weapons and ammunition, has sharply upped the ante on
Syria.

Reports from The Times on Friday night claimed that 300 US Marines have
already been deployed to northern Jordan, along with a Patriot anti-aircraft
missile, ahead of plans to arm the rebels.

The Kremlin, which has backed the regime diplomatically and militarily and
ignored months of Western entreaties to use their influence to rein in Mr
Assad, reacted
with derision to Washington’s finding that Syria had used chemical weapons
.

US President Barack Obama has numerous problematic options to deal with
over Syria.

“What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us,” said
Yuri Ushakov, President Vladimir Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, before
comparing the findings to the US intelligence dossiers on Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction.

Syria also predictably scorned the US findings, accusing the White House of
making “a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria
based on fabricated information”, according to a foreign ministry official
quoted by the state news agency SANA.

“The United States is using cheap tactics to justify President Barack Obama’s
decision to arm the Syrian opposition,” he added.

In Washington, Senator John McCain said the increased US support for the
Syrian opposition was woefully inadequate, accusing President Barack Obama
of “insane” and “disgraceful” inaction amid the massacre of 93,000 people.

“For us to sit by, and watch these people being massacred, raped, tortured, in
the most terrible fashion, meanwhile the Russians are all in, Hizbollah is
all-in, and we’re talking about giving them light weapons? It’s insane. And
let me just tell you it is turning into a regional conflict, not just a
conflict within Syria.

“Does anybody believe today that Bashar al-Assad is bound to fall? Of course
not. It’s disgraceful, the conduct of the United States in sitting by and
watching this happen.”

Mr Putin and Mr Obama are to meet on the sidelines of the G8 at Lough Erne,
ostensibly to discuss how to resuscitate the Geneva peace proposals which is
increasingly being overtaken by events on the ground. Fighting around the
suburbs of Aleppo was reported to be “at its most violent in months”,
according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group.

Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama

Europe remains divided over how best to assist the rebels, with Angela Merkel,
the German chancellor, calling for “urgent discussions” at the UN Security
Council over how to bring all sides to the so-called Geneva II peace process
announced in Moscow in May.

Sweden opposed the US move to provide greater military support. Carl Bildt,
the foreign minister, warned that the US decision could set off an arms race
with Russia, which is already considering whether to supply its advanced
S300 air defence systems. “I don’t think the way forward is to get an arms
race going in Syria,” he said, “There’s a risk that that would undermine the
conditions for a political process.”

A photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA – a Syrian man
who suffered an alleged chemical attack at Khan al-Assal village is treated
in hospital

Gen Salim Idris, the commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, welcomed the US
pledge of further support. “We hope to have the weapons and ammunition that
we need in the near future,” he told Al-Arabiya TV. “This will surely
reflect positively on the rebels’ morale.”

Downing Street said “no decision had been taken” on whether Britain – which
pushed for the ending of an EU arms embargo last month – should join the US
in arming the opposition fighters.

The option of enforcing a limited no-fly zone to protect rebel training bases
in Jordan, is also being considered, according to US officials. However, the
French government indicated that it would be almost impossible to secure the
necessary international agreements.

A Free Syrian Army fighter pointing his weapon in the old city of
Aleppo, Syria.

US officials also played down the possibility, despite the deployment of
Patriot missile and aircraft to Jordan in recent weeks, warning of “great
and open-ended costs for the United States and the international community”.

Asked about a no-fly zone, Downing Street said “nothing was off the table”.

Source Article from http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568301/s/2d4ed8ab/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Cmiddleeast0Csyria0C10A1219210CSyria0EBritain0EUS0Eand0EFrance0Ein0Eurgent0Etalks0Eon0Earming0Erebels0Bhtml/story01.htm

Views: 0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Syria: Britain, US and France in urgent talks on arming rebels

Added urgency was provided by the disclosure from David Cameron that rebel
groups affiliated to al-Qaeda “have attempted to acquire” chemical weapons
for use in Syria, citing briefings from British intelligence.

The US announcement that it would be sending military aid to the rebels,
including communications equipment, logistical support and – according to
some officials – light weapons and ammunition, has sharply upped the ante on
Syria.

Reports from The Times on Friday night claimed that 300 US Marines have
already been deployed to northern Jordan, along with a Patriot anti-aircraft
missile, ahead of plans to arm the rebels.

The Kremlin, which has backed the regime diplomatically and militarily and
ignored months of Western entreaties to use their influence to rein in Mr
Assad, reacted
with derision to Washington’s finding that Syria had used chemical weapons
.

US President Barack Obama has numerous problematic options to deal with
over Syria.

“What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us,” said
Yuri Ushakov, President Vladimir Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, before
comparing the findings to the US intelligence dossiers on Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction.

Syria also predictably scorned the US findings, accusing the White House of
making “a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria
based on fabricated information”, according to a foreign ministry official
quoted by the state news agency SANA.

“The United States is using cheap tactics to justify President Barack Obama’s
decision to arm the Syrian opposition,” he added.

In Washington, Senator John McCain said the increased US support for the
Syrian opposition was woefully inadequate, accusing President Barack Obama
of “insane” and “disgraceful” inaction amid the massacre of 93,000 people.

“For us to sit by, and watch these people being massacred, raped, tortured, in
the most terrible fashion, meanwhile the Russians are all in, Hizbollah is
all-in, and we’re talking about giving them light weapons? It’s insane. And
let me just tell you it is turning into a regional conflict, not just a
conflict within Syria.

“Does anybody believe today that Bashar al-Assad is bound to fall? Of course
not. It’s disgraceful, the conduct of the United States in sitting by and
watching this happen.”

Mr Putin and Mr Obama are to meet on the sidelines of the G8 at Lough Erne,
ostensibly to discuss how to resuscitate the Geneva peace proposals which is
increasingly being overtaken by events on the ground. Fighting around the
suburbs of Aleppo was reported to be “at its most violent in months”,
according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group.

Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama

Europe remains divided over how best to assist the rebels, with Angela Merkel,
the German chancellor, calling for “urgent discussions” at the UN Security
Council over how to bring all sides to the so-called Geneva II peace process
announced in Moscow in May.

Sweden opposed the US move to provide greater military support. Carl Bildt,
the foreign minister, warned that the US decision could set off an arms race
with Russia, which is already considering whether to supply its advanced
S300 air defence systems. “I don’t think the way forward is to get an arms
race going in Syria,” he said, “There’s a risk that that would undermine the
conditions for a political process.”

A photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA – a Syrian man
who suffered an alleged chemical attack at Khan al-Assal village is treated
in hospital

Gen Salim Idris, the commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, welcomed the US
pledge of further support. “We hope to have the weapons and ammunition that
we need in the near future,” he told Al-Arabiya TV. “This will surely
reflect positively on the rebels’ morale.”

Downing Street said “no decision had been taken” on whether Britain – which
pushed for the ending of an EU arms embargo last month – should join the US
in arming the opposition fighters.

The option of enforcing a limited no-fly zone to protect rebel training bases
in Jordan, is also being considered, according to US officials. However, the
French government indicated that it would be almost impossible to secure the
necessary international agreements.

A Free Syrian Army fighter pointing his weapon in the old city of
Aleppo, Syria.

US officials also played down the possibility, despite the deployment of
Patriot missile and aircraft to Jordan in recent weeks, warning of “great
and open-ended costs for the United States and the international community”.

Asked about a no-fly zone, Downing Street said “nothing was off the table”.

Source Article from http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568301/s/2d4ed8ab/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Cmiddleeast0Csyria0C10A1219210CSyria0EBritain0EUS0Eand0EFrance0Ein0Eurgent0Etalks0Eon0Earming0Erebels0Bhtml/story01.htm

Views: 0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes