Jew World Order

In this short essay I want to address a big problem in the study of our past, namely the growing trend among scientists who claim White people were a few thousand years ago some kind of mixture between Arabs and Siberian Indians.

The deception lies not in the data or in the methods, of course, but rather in the assumptions made and in the lack of common sense. Hyper-rationalism is an inheritance of our Judeo-Christian culture, making us incapable of seeing beyond rational arguments and present data. Our intuitions, common sense and creativity are turned off and this makes us reach stupid and false conclusions, even when based on rational arguments.

My attention was turned recently toward this fraud, and I realized very quickly that we are dealing with Marxist infiltration of academic knowledge. As I started to do more research I discovered one by one the marks of scientific subterfuge, like the lack of clarity in the claims or the fact that all sources reach strange conclusions without further explanation and with total equanimity.

No one is discussing how it is possible that an Amerindian-like bastard race became, in literally just a few years, a pure breed Norwegian. This should have triggered a passionate discussion, but all scientists pretend nothing weird is going on. That is a clear warning sign.

Here is a summary of the situation: Newest genetic research points out strongly for an origin of the Indo-Europeans in the Caspian steppes and the bearers of this culture were brown people, a mixture of Middle Eastern and Siberian hunters. They replaced the earlier farmers of Europe and contribute supposedly to around 70% of the Genes or White people:

..the spread of the Yamnaya horizon was the material expression of the spread of late Proto-Indo-European across the Pontic-Caspian steppes.” The genetic basis of a number of physical features of the Yamnaya people were ascertained by the ancient DNA study conducted by Haak et al. (2015), Wilde et al. (2014), Mathieson et al. (2015): they were genetically tall (phenotypic height is determined by both genetics and environmental factors), overwhelmingly dark-eyed (brown), dark-haired and had a skin colour that was moderately light, though somewhat darker than that of the average modern European.[25][6] Despite their pastoral lifestyle, there was little evidence of lactase persistence.[26] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamna_culture#Characteristic)

Now, this doesn’t fit with reality. We do not know with certainty which material remains belong to the Proto-Indo-Europeans, therefore the fact that the Yamnaya people are the bearers of the Corded-ware culture (assumed to be the Indo-Europeans) doesn’t mean they are the original Proto-Indo-Europeans. Secondly, even if they were the Proto-Indo Europeans that would only mean that the Indo-Europeans are not the genetic ancestors of White people (but more of this later).

This is the case because we know the earlier hunters of Northern Europe, before the arrival of the IE were already blond, tall and blue-eyed, therefore we realize that the Whiter you are, the less you resemble those Yamnaya brown people.

Here is the part where some people obsessed with haplo-groups and genetic markers will protest that genetic probes all around Europe show the tested persons to be related to these Yamnaya people. That I can believe, but we must remember that real Nordic people are a minority in Europe. Only central and Northern Europe got isolated from mixture with the brown, south-living people, and that’s why Northern Europe shows more continuity in population than the rest.

The problem lies in the samples taken. Scientist take many samples of people all around the world with consideration only to geography and not to outer appearance of the tested persons, therefore out of the European samples they have perhaps only a few from Central and Northern Europe, and from those few only two or three have real Nordic appearance.

Nordic people show little mixture with those brown invaders, but apparently they lump them together with all the race-mixed Europeans.

I read the most recent study regarding the genetic history of Northern Europe and, regarding Scandinavia, they took samples of only a single(!) ancient DNA, namely from Sweden, and they put this single person together with samples from Russia, which we know has been in contact with Asiatic people from Siberia since immemorial times.

Nonetheless, most ancient DNA samples in that paper were taken from the Baltic countries and surprise of surprises, they showed extreme continuity with the first settlers, the tall, blond hunters; and that should apply to all of Northern Europe.

Strangely enough they interpreted that as an exception (despite most samples coming from them) and made assumptions for all Northern Europe based namely on a single sample from Scandinavia and samples of race-mixed people outside of Northern Europe.

We see that the more Northern we look, the less we find these Yamnaya invaders and that’s the important point. Only people who didn’t mix with them, even if they are in the minority today within Europe, are really Whites. I believe only Celts, Baltic and North Germanics, hence the people who live today in Northern Europe to be really White. There are some pockets of real Whiteness in Ukraine, Slavic countries and Finland too.

Now I want to tell you why I don’t believe the Indo-Europeans were the Yamnaya people. The Indo-Europeans are described invariably as blond, tall with blue eyes in the sources, and we know the Yamnaya were race-mixed, brown people.

The fact that the ancient DNA of a culture with Indo-European remains turns out to be non-White could mean also that the White rulers (the grounders of the culture) were in the minority and their DNA was not preserved for us to analyze.

Now let me present you another example of stupidity using modern genetics. An article in the German magazine die Welt claims every tenth German has Jewish ancestry and only one third of the whole German population are really Germanic.

We see, of course, that this is no more than cheap propaganda from a Jewish owned magazine. We know historically that the Jews made only a small percentage of German population and both the Jews and the Germans consciously avoided mixing with one another through all their history (Jews mixed willingly only in small, controlled proportions in order to infiltrate the White elites). These absurd claims must lie in the samples taken too.

More ridiculous is the claim that only a third of the German people is really of Germanic origin. Using a language analogy, it is like claiming only a third of Germanic languages belong to the Germanic branch of languages. That makes, of course, no sense.

Germanic means the White people who have inhabited Germany and Scandinavia, not a mental construct based on accidental, mute remains.

Someone took DNA samples from a few ancient skeletons belonging to a culture they guess to be Germanic and they decided only people belonging to these two accidental samples are Germanic, even if these ‘Germanic’ samples could be passer-by tourists like Ötzi, or didn’t belong to the ancestors of the White people who have lived in those lands.

That’s the problem of hyper-rationalism. Instead of saying Northern Europe has a distinct White people, we should find out where they came from. They give more weight to mute findings than to the visible reality of the last thousand years.

In order to differentiate myself from those swindlers I want to make my statement as clear and direct as possible, taking the responsibility of having an opinion of my own:

I believe White people arose isolated in Central Germany and Scandinavia out of the first hunters. They preserved their genetic integrity till today, but a few of them started wandering south, being known as the Indo-Europeans, although we cannot assign them yet with certainty to specific remains.

After some time these wanderers started to mix, disappearing in a mass of brown people and that’s why we cannot find them so easily in accidental, isolated samples. Modern geneticists profit from this confusion of migrations and mixtures in order to claim Whites originated from some kind of Amerindians.

***

I left to the end my most important argument and that is the fact that a new race doesn’t appear out of mixture, but rather out of isolation. A race which has been evolving alone, will disintegrate with mixture, and not the other way around.

Don’t get me wrong, this doesn’t mean pure races do not have mixtures in their past, I mean rather that they became visibly different only because they isolated at some point. They stopped mixing, while digesting that mixture into a race. This painful process of becoming a race takes many, many years and not every population survives this brutal process; most of them fall apart into conflict and never become totally homogeneous.

There are only two thousand years(!) of separation between the arrival of these brown Yamnaya people in Europe and the first reports regarding the physical appearance of Germanics and Celts by Roman authors.

Are we supposed to believe that this brown people, who have been continually mixing, became like the pure Nordics described by Roman authors (with almost no outer resemblance to other peoples) in just two thousand years?

Have the late Romans become a new, purer looking, Whiter, taller, more homogeneous race after two thousand years mixture?

Scientists have computed that modern human races become with time ever more different from each other and that this process goes ever faster (evolution hasn’t stopped). Since we have historical records (together with depictions, etc.) no race has transformed itself in such a way comparable to what is expected from a Yamnaya to become a Norwegian. Even when transformation goes faster today than back then!

In conclusion: As long as these haplo-groups mumbo-jumbo and these genetic-marker hocus-pocus don’t accord with visible reality and common sense, no one should take them seriously, despite of their complicated language and intimidating computations, because Nature and reality are the ultimate arbiter not mental-specters or sophisticated theories alone.