The Safest Place to Be In a Terror Attack Is Next to President Obama





CSS Offical-New-Logo2

 

sweeden muslim riots 2

In the event of a terror attack, the safest place to stand is next to a prominent politician, preferably the President of the United States. Said President is seemingly immune from such attacks. Why is this true? This article explores the undeniable truth that terrorists never strike at prominent politicians, only average people. Why? Because people controlled by fear, are more easily controlled.

Lone, Nut Assassins Are Much More Effective Than Terrorists When It Comes to Political Assassinations

Why is it a proven fact that “lone, nut assassins can get close and kill or wound politicians, but terrorists never do?

– John Wilkes Booth assassinated President Abraham Lincoln at point blank range.

– Charles Guiteau assassinated President James Garfield at point blank range.

– Leon Czolgosz assassinated President William McKinley at point blank range.

– Lee Harvey Oswald “allegedly” assassinates President John F. Kennedy from several yards away from JFK’s motorcade.

– Sir Han Sir Han “allegedly” assassinates Presidential candidate and frontrunner, Bobby Kennedy at point blank range.

– John Hinckley comes within an eyelash of assassinating President Ronald Reagan at point blank range. Reagan barely survived a gunshot wound to the lung.

Again, I ask, why is it that only lone nut assassins can get close enough to kill or wound a President, but terrorists never do?

The Belgian Government Is Guilty of Fear-Mongering of the Highest Order

When it comes to terrorism, why is that only the common man can be impacted by terrorists? Why aren’t politicians driven underground, so to speak, in the face of a terror threat. Why should people avoid “public areas” for fear of being a victim of terrorism, but politicians still make public appearances?

Didier Reynders "Fear Everything and Everyone!"

Didier Reynders, “Fear Everything and Everyone!”

On November 20, 2015, the Belgian Foreign Minister, Didier Reynders, hyped the terrorist fear unnecessarily by raising its terror alert to its highest level in the history of Brussels. Public transportation venues, such as the Metro stations and other lesser public transportation venues that people rely on were temporarily shut down. Why is it that only the venues frequented by the common man are impacted and nothing connected to the elite are ever threatened by terroristic violence?

Reynders went on to greatly and irresponsibly hype the fear when he uttered, “We have sufficient elements to estimate that the threat of an attack is precise and imminent.” Yet, Reynders provided absolutely no proof that supporting his claim that a terror attack is imminent. In fact, Belgium’s Coordinating Unit for Threat Analysis (OCAM/OCAD) has greatly added to hyping the fear level by warning people “to avoid crowded areas, including public venues and transportation hubs”, yet again, no proof was offered to justify for the hyping of the fear level.

What is going on in Belgium reminds me what happened in Boston after the Boston Marathon Bombing. Who could forget the following images as Boston became a clear sign of things to come in the United during the coming wave of terror attacks!

Are We In Belgium or Boston?

Belgian martial law

Belgian martial law

 

Boston Martial Law

Boston Martial Law

 

Belgian Martial Law

Belgian Martial Law

 

Boston Martial Law

Boston Martial Law

Regardless of the Country, the Agenda Is Always the Same

 

boston martial law dress rehearsal

 

What Does It All Mean?

sweeden muslim riots 9

The FBI and has consistently said that 10% of the Muslim population is radicalized. It has been said before and it bears repeating, that when Obama relocates tens of thousands of Muslims to the United States, 10% of these people are potential terrorists who have not been screened and pose a significant security risk to the people of the United States. And when the bulk of the immigrants are young, healthy, athletic males, the threat level is increased exponentially.

The NWO Agenda Is Clear for All Who Have Eyes to See

It is so clear that if terrorists wanted to assassinate political figures, such as a President, they could and they would. If John Hinckley can get close enough to shoot President Reagan, then a “Muhammad Atta” should be able to get even close enough to President Obama. Then why don’t they? The answer is simple, all terrorism is state sponsored terrorism and terrorists are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. And who controls the state? The elite who are using these tools of political manipulation which will perpetuate their agenda. And what is their agenda? The agenda of the NWO is clear and unmistakable. They seek to erase all national boundaries, as evidenced by the hordes of immigrants which are destabilizing the so-called Western democracies.

Through fear mongering, perpetuated by a series of so-called terror attacks, the NWO is conditioning the sheeple to accept a brutal, totalitarian dictatorship which will include the elimination of all individual civil liberties and the NWO is using Muslims to accomplish this goal.

In the event of a terror attack, please proceed to and stand with the most prominent politican you can find.

The above comment needs no elaboration.

In the event of a terror attack, stand next to this man.

And with this….

immigrants are soldiers

The West is going to get more of this..

What will you use for tender if the dollar collapses in a World War III scenario?

What will you use for tender if the dollar collapses in a World War III scenario?

 







Dave Hodges


Dave Hodges











Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaveHodges-TheCommonSenseShow/~3/TSeZSexkESI/

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes