RSS Feed
June 17th, 2014 
Awake Goy Who is ISIS ? – Really
June 13, 2014 at 7:27pm
• Copy n Paste (plus screen shots of entire article in case FB redact it) from Laurent
Guyenot – 20.8.2013 http://english.irib.ir/analysis/articles2/item/178909-isisand-
al-qaeda,-two-sides-of-the-same-us-minted-coin
• http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/world/map-how-isis-is-carving-out-anew-
country/1095/
• http://www.theweek.co.uk/world-news/isis/58941/mayhem-in-iraq-don-t-expectblair-
co-to-take-blame-forisis#
ixzz34UewZZuB%3Chttp://www.theweek.co.uk/worldnews/
isis/58941/mayhem-in-iraq-don-t-expect-blair-co-to-take-blame-for-isis%3E
“Was 9/11 an Inside Job, or a Mossad Job?” (and the expertise with which False
Flags continue)
LAURENT GUYENOT AUGUST 20, 2013 61
The role of the Israeli Deep State in the Sept. 11th terror attacks, which have laid
the foundation for the 21st century on the biggest lie in human history, is
surrounded by a taboo even within the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement. Most
activists groups remain focused on the slogan “9/11 was an Inside Job”, and keep
their eyes “wide shut” on the evidence incriminating the secret services of the
Jewish State. Laurent Guyénot reviews the key evidence, and questions the process
of denial.
by Laurent Guyénot
As the role of Israel and its powerful lobby in the recent destabilization of the
Middle-East becomes clearer, the idea that a gang of Israeli likudniks, helped by
their moles in the U.S. administration, are responsible for the false flag 9/11 attacks,
is gaining ground. Francesco Cossiga, President of Italy between 1985 and 1992,
said in 2007 to the newspaper Corriere della Sera, that it was well known in
informed circles in America and Europe that the September 11th attack “was
planned and executed by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist
world in order to blame the Arab countries, and to persuade the Western powers to
intervene in both Iraq and Afghanistan”[1]. Alan Sabrosky, a professor at the U.S.
Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, published in July 2012 an article
entitled “Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake”, where he explained
his conviction that September 11th was “a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation”
carried out with the complicity of the U.S. government, in order to lead the United
States into a “war of civilizations” against the enemies of Israel — which is to say,
against the Arab-Muslim world as a whole[2].
[Those who dare raise suspicions about Israel’s involvement in 9/11 are quickly
marginalized as outcasts, as Thierry Meyssan has experienced after his groundbreaking
work in exposing The Big Lie less than a year after the event.]
Suspicion of Mossad guilt does not stem only from the reputation of the world’s
most powerful secret service, which a report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced
Military Studies (SAMS), quoted by the Washington Times, September 10th, 2001,
described as “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and
make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act”[3]. The Mossad involvement, together with
other Israeli elite units, can be demonstrated by several little known facts. These facts
have been compiled by Justin Raimondo, editorial director of Antiwar.com, inThe Terror
Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection, 2003[4], and by Christopher Bollyn in more
than a hundred articles, synthesized in Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the
World (2012)[5], but they have received little attention in most 9/11 Truth investigative
books and websites.
200 Israeli pseudo-spies
Few people know, for example, that at the time of the attacks, the American federal
police were busy dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever caught on U.S. soil. In
March 2001, the National CounterIntelligence Center (NCIC) posted this message on its
website: “In the past six weeks, employees in federal office buildings located throughout
the United States have reported suspicious activities connected with individuals
representing themselves as foreign [Israeli] students selling or delivering artwork”. The
NCIC states that, “these individuals have also gone to the private residences of senior
federal officials under the guise of selling art”.
Then in the summer, after a number of incidents of this type in its premises, the Drug
Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a report which would be revealed to the public by
the Washington Post on November 23rd, 2001, followed by a Carl Cameron’s four-part
documentary broadcast on Fox News from December 11th, 2001. On March 14th, 2002,
an article in Le Monde signed by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before
the French magazine Intelligence Online made it fully accessible on the Internet[6]. The
DEA report listed 140 Israelis, aged between 20 and 30, arrested since March 2001.
Organized in twenty teams of four to eight members, they visited at least “36 sensitive
sites of the Department of Defense”. Many of them were identified as members of the
Mossad, and six were in possession of phones paid for by a former Israeli Vice Consul.
Sixty arrests have occurred after September 11th, bringing the total number of Israeli
spies arrested to 200. Those who were subjected to a lie detector test failed. However,
thanks to a decision that would come from the Attorney General John Ashcroft, all were
eventually released.
The report concluded that,“the nature of the individuals’ conducts […] leads us to
believe the incidents may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity”. However,
the nature of the intelligence gathered remains mysterious. It could well be that espionage
was not their primary mission, when one considers the training received by some in the
Israeli army, according to the DEA report: “A majority of those questioned has stated
they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance
units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the
son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army,
one served in a Patriot mission unit”. Another, Peer Segalovitz, under-officer in the 605
Battalion of the Golan Heights “acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars,
and anything else that he needed to”. It may be that this espionage activity — as
ostentatious as it was unproductive, apparently — was really a secondary cover behind
their primary cover as “art students”, the art-student cover being not intended to deceive
anyone but rather to draw attention to their secondary cover.
Why would these Israeli agents need to be labeled as spies? One possible answer is
suggested by a crucial detail mentioned in the DEA report: “The Hollywood, Florida,
area seems to be a central point for these individuals”. Of the 140 fake Israeli students
identified before the attacks, more than 30 lived in or near the city of Hollywood, Florida
(140,000 inhabitants), exactly where 15 of the 19 alleged Islamist hijackers had
regrouped (9 in Hollywood, 6 in the vicinity). One of the “art students” arrested, Hanan
Serfaty — actually an Israeli intelligence officer who handled at least $100,000 in three
months — rented two Hollywood apartments close to the apartment of Mohamed Atta.
What were the relations between the Israeli spies and the Islamist terrorists? The
explanation relayed by the press is that the Israelis were there only to monitor the
terrorists. Israel comes out only slightly tainted, since a spy agency cannot be reasonably
blamed for not sharing information. At most Israel can be accused of “letting it happen”,
a guarantee of impunity. The information is minimized in the mind of the public by the
absence of any follow-up, according to the principle of the “media vaccine”. This could
explain the spy activity of the “Israeli art students” as a secondary cover, designed to
explain away their link to the Islamist terrorists: they were Israeli false flag terrorist
experts dressed as Israeli spies dressed as Israeli art students, their cover as art student
being really designed to draw attention on their undercover as spies monitoring al-Qaeda.
In reality, they were not spying of these so-called terrorists, but manipulating them,
funding them, and ultimately making them disappear. These patsy terrorists’
relationship to Israeli secret services is thus very similar to Oswald’s relationship to
the CIA. An article in the New York Times on February 18th, 2009, established that
Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had
spent 25 years spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the
Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah since 1983. He is currently in prison in
Lebanon[7]. Recall also that the “Mohamed Atta” in Florida was a fake.The real
Mohamed Atta, who called his father after the attacks, was described by his family as
reserved, pious, not solicitous of women and having a fear of flying. He had had his
passport stolen in 1999 while studying architecture in Hamburg. The false Mohamed
Atta in Florida was living with a stripper, ate pork, loved fast cars, casinos and
cocaine[8]. As has been reported by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel on September 16
(Jody Benjamin, “Suspects’ Actions Don’t Add Up”), he got drunk and intoxicated and
paid for the services of several prostitutes in the weeks and days prior to September 11th,
along with four other suicide bombers who had similar behavior — incompatible with
the Islamic preparation for death.
[Ehud Barak, former chief of the Israeli military Intelligence (Sayeret Matkal) was
Prime Minister from July 1999 to March 2001. When replaced by Sharon, he took a
job as adviser for Electronic Data Systems and for SCP Partners, a front company
specialized in security, known as a front for Mossad, and with access to high tech
explosives such as nano-thermite through its partners Metallurg Holdings and
Advanced Metallurgical. SCP Partners had an office in the town of Englewood, New
Jersey, less than 7 miles from Urban Moving Systems (see below).
One hour after the explosion of the North Tower, Barak was on BBC World to point to
bin Laden as prime suspect and demand immediate retaliation against Afghanistan.]
Dancing Israelis
One particular event makes the connection between Mossad and 9/11 hard to dismiss. It
was reported the day after the attacks by the journalist Paulo Lima in the regional
newspaper of Bergen County, New Jersey, The Record, based on “sources close to the
investigation”. Immediately after the first impact on the North Tower, three individuals
were seen on the roof of a van parked at Liberty State Park in Jersey
City, “celebrating”, and“jumping up and down”, taking pictures with the twin towers in
the background. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey
City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same ostentatious celebrations. The
police soon issued a BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out): “Vehicle possibly related to New
York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with
‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the
time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with van were
seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion”.
The van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men inside, all Israelis: Sivan
and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. Before a
question was even asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, burst out strangely: “We are
Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians
are your problem”. The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as members of the
Mossad. Police sources interviewed by Paulo Lima were convinced of Israeli
involvement in the morning’s attacks: “There are maps of the city in the car with certain
places highlighted. It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew
what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park”. They were found to
carry passports of different nationalities, $6,000 in cash, and open plane tickets for
abroad. The five Israelis officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for
espionage) named Urban Moving Systems. An employee of the company
told The Record that the majority of his colleagues were Israeli and that they were happy
upon hearing of the attacks: “I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered
me”. On September 14th, after a visit from the police, the business owner, Israeli-
American Dominik Otto Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv.
[Yaron Shmuel has a LinkedIn profile that boasts his “explosives” and “secret
services” expertise and experience.[1]
His Facebook account mentions that he got married on September 11, 2002 —the first
anniversary of the “Big Wedding”, as 9/11 is sometimes referred to in Israeli circles,
for the special bonding it created with the U.S.[2] ]
The information disclosed by The Record was verified and taken up and by investigative
sites like The Wayne Madsen Report (September 14, 2005) and Counterpunch(February
7, 2007). It was also reported in some mainstream media, but in a curtailed way that
minimized its significance: The New York Times (November 21, 2001) forgot to mention
the nationality of the five suspects, as did Fox News and Associated Press.
The Washington Post (November 23, 2001) did mention it, but not their apparent
foreknowledge of the event, giving credence to their own excuse that they were merely
happy that Americans will now feel empathy for Israel’s situation. Only The
Forward, the magazine of New York Jewish community (March 15, 2002) revealed
their Mossad connection, quoting an anonymous U.S. Intelligence source to the effect
that Urban Moving Systems was a front company for the Mossad (and yet had received
a $ 498,750 federal loan, as its tax records show).
[Omer Marmari, Oded Ellner, and Yaron Shmuel, three of the five “dancing Israelis”,
invited on an Israeli TV talk show after their return home in November 2001. “Our
purpose was simply to document the event”, ingenuously declared one of them[10].]
The 579-page FBI report on the investigation that followed (partially declassified in
2005, fully in 2035), revealed several important elements[11]. First, once developed, the
photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire confirm their
attitudes of celebration: “They smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to ‘high
five’ one another”. To explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply
happy that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, “the United States will take steps to stop
terrorism in the world”. Yet at this point, most Americans believed the crash was an
accident. Besides, at least one witness saw them positioned to watch the scene at 8
am, before the first plane hit the WTC, while others confirmed seeing them immediately
after. A former employee of Urban Moving Systems testified about the anti-American
mentality prevailing in the company, quoting one Israeli employee as saying to
Americans: “Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your
country”. The five Israelis from the van were also found to be connected to another
removal company called Classic International Movers, which employed five other
Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed suicide hijackers. In
addition, one of the five suspects had called “an individual in South America with
authentic ties to Islamic militants in the middle east”. Finally, the FBI report states that
the “The vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a
positive result for the presence of explosive traces”.
After all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of the report: its
conclusion that “the FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the detainees and
they should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings”. In fact, a letter
addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated September 25th,
2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the events, the FBI federal headquarter had
already decided to close the investigation, asking that “The U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings”.
The five “dancing Israelis”, also known as “the high fivers”, were detained 71 days in a
Brooklyn prison, where they first refused, then failed, lie detector tests, before being
quietly returned to Israel under the minimal charge of “visa violation”.
[Michael Chertoff, son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer, was heading the Criminal
Division of the Department of Justice in 2001. As such, he was responsible for the
retention and destruction of all the material evidence regarding the 9/11 attacks, from
the steel beams of the WTC to the video recordings at the Pentagon. He was also
responsible for the quick repatriation of the “dancing Israelis”. In 2003, he was
appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of counter-terrorism on the
American soil, which allowed him to control dissenting citizens and restrain access to
the evidence under the pretext of Sensitive Security Information.]
What remains the most puzzling aspect of this whole story is the recklessly ostentatious
behavior of these young Israelis undercover agents, high-fiving on the top of their van.
One possible explanation comes from a rarely mentioned detail: it seems that several
witnesses mentioned that they looked Middle-Eastern. One anonymous call to the police
in Jersey City, reported the same day by NBC News, mentioned “a white van, 2 or 3 guys
in there. They look like Palestinians and going around a building. […] I see the guy by
Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. […] He’s dressed
like an Arab”[12]. It was this call that led to the interception of the van and the arrest of
the five Israelis. Two hypotheses come to mind, here. Either they were indeed dressed up
as Arab/Palestinian/Muslim, or the anonymous witness was an accomplice. The second
hypothesis seems more likely for two reasons: first, neither the police nor the FBI report
mention any middle-eastern clothes found in the van. Second, the anonymous caller
falsely said that the van was heading toward Holland Tunnel, whereas it was intercepted
on Lincoln Tunnel, only because the police decided to block all access between New
York and New Jersey. In either case, there is the obvious intention to start a rumor that
Arabs had been seen rejoicing at the attacks and behaving suspiciously. If police hadn’t
spotted the van, the story would have circulated around the world on mainstream TVs
under the title: “The Arab Dancers”.
The New York network
An operation such as this requires, outside of government, the technical
participation of powerful people, super-sayanim so to
speak. Sayanim(“collaborators” in Hebrew) are Jews living outside Israel and known
to the Mossad as potentially ready to give a hand, in the form of an unlawful action,
without necessarily knowing the entire operation. According to the renegade agent Victor
Ostrovsky (By Way of Deception, 1990), there are thousands of sayanim in the United
States, especially in New York, the capital of Jewish Americans. Larry Silverstein, the
WTC leaseholder, appears as the archetype sayan of September 11th. He is a leading
member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New
York, the largest American fundraiser for Israel (after the U.S. government itself). He
is also an intimate friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he converses by telephone
every Sunday, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Silverstein’s partner in the
WTC lease was, for the underground shopping center, Frank Lowy, another Zionist
“philanthropist” close to Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, and former member of the
Haganah. The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted the lease to Silverstein
and Lowy, is none other than Lewis Eisenberg, another member of the United Jewish
Appeal Federation and former Vice-President of AIPAC.
[Lucky Larry! Every morning of the week, Larry Silverstein had breakfast at the
Windows on the World on top of the North Tower, until September 11th, when he had
an appointment with his dermatologist.]
Other members of the New York network can be easily identified. According to the NIST
report, the Boeing which crashed into the North Tower “cut a gash that was over half the
width of the building and extended from the 93rd floor to the 99th floor. All but the lowest
of these floors were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide insurance company,
which also occupied the 100th floor”.[13] The CEO of Marsh & McLennan is Jeffrey
Greenberg, member of one of the richest Jewish dynasty who contributed heavily to
George W. Bush’s 2000 campaign. The Greenbergs were also the insurers of the Twin
Towers and, on the 24th of July 2001, they took the precaution of having the
contract reinsured by competitors, who had to indemnify Silverstein and Lowy after
9/11, and yet were not entitled to investigate themselves. And since this is a small
world, in November 2000, Lewis Paul Bremer joined the Board of Directors of Marsh &
McLennan. On September 11th, 2001, Bremer, we recall, would be the Chairman of the
National Commission on Terrorism appearing on NBC to name Bin Laden as prime
suspect and, in 2003, he would be appointed as Administrator of the Coalition
Provisional Authority in Iraq. Under his leadership, 9 billion dollars disappeared in
fraud, corruption and embezzlement, according to a report by the Special Inspector
General for Iraq Reconstruction, Stuart Bowen, published January 30th, 2005.
[Lewis Paul Bremer on NBC two hours after the collapse of the North Tower on
September 11th, calm and relaxed, as 400 of his employees are missing (295 will finally
be declared dead).]
There must have been other accomplices to the 9/11 false flag attack in the airports and
airlines involved in the attacks. Both airports from which flights AA11, UA175 and
UA93 took off (Logan Airport in Boston and Newark Airport near New York)
subcontracted their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), a
firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon, a treasurer of the Likud. A
serious investigation would likely expose many other people involved, not necessarily
with the full knowledge of the operation; on September 27th, 2001, the Washington
Post reported that, “officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two
employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two
hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks”. The first plane hit
the WTC “almost to the minute”, confirmed Alex Diamandis, Vice-President of Odigo,
headquartered in Israel. Even more disturbing is the behavior of the American branch
of Zim Israel Navigational, a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state
(occasionally used as a cover for the Israeli secret service), which moved its offices from
the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4th, 2001, one week before the
attacks —“like an act of God, we moved”, said the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when
interviewed by USA Today, November 17th, 2001[14].
All the facts mentioned above give new meaning to the words of Bob Graham,
pseudo-whistleblower of the 9/11 Commission, claiming to have “evidence that there
were foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some of the
terrorists in the United States”[15]. Speaking in a PBS interview in December 2002,
Graham, of course, was referring to Saudi Arabia. He repeated the charge in his
bookIntelligence Matters: The CIA, the FBI, Saudi Arabia, and the Failure of America’s
War on Terror (2004), denouncing the government censorship of 28 pages of the
Commission’s report dealing with Saudi support to terrorists. Why would the Saud
family have helped Osama bin Laden after stripping him of his Saudi nationality and
putting price on his head for his attacks on their soil? “The answer I have come to”, says
Graham, “is survival — survival of the state and survival of the House of Saud”. Or, as
he explained more clearly in July 2011: “the threat of civil unrest against the monarchy,
led by al-Qaeda”[16]. This ridiculous theory (which Graham, lacking arguments,
developed in a novel)[17] has only one purpose: to divert suspicion away from the
only “foreign government” whose links with terrorist suspects are out in the open: Israel
(an enemy of Saudi Arabia, as it happens).
The conspiracy within the conspiracy
In asserting further that the Saudi connection was stifled because of “the special personal
friendship between the [Saudi] royal family and the highest levels of our national
government [meaning President Bush]”, Graham is using George W. Bush as a fuse, a
lightning rod, or a human shield. This is a clearly identifiable damage control strategy of
the neocons. In their book An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror (2003),
Richard Perle and David Frum argue that “the Saudis qualify for their own membership in
the axis of evil”, and implore President Bush to “tell the truth about Saudi Arabia”,
namely that the Saudi princes finance al-Qaeda. These fabricated rumors of Saudi
involvement in 9/11 are, in fact, indicative of a power struggle between several players
within the Deep State.
The commercial partnership forged by the Bushs with Saudi Arabia is notorious. It
started when CIA Director George H.W. Bush first traded with the bin Mahfouzs and the
bin Ladens, through a company of aircraft brokerage entrusted to Jim Bath. Commercial
exchanges were broadened during the Gulf War, which allowed President Bush to pose as
protector of Saudi Arabia. The Carlyle Group, of which George Bush is a shareholder,
played a central role, and is notoriously linked with a nephew of King Fahd. A scandal
broke out in March 2001, during one of Bush’s visits to Saudi Arabia, as acting head of
the Carlyle Group. The nature of his meeting with King Fahd raised questions: was this a
diplomatic meeting, private business travel, or both? On the same occasion, the former
President also met the bin Laden family, in business with Carlyle since 1990. On
September 11th, 2001, George Bush and Shafig bin Laden (Osama’s half-brother) were
holding a meeting of the Carlyle Group in Washington, with several hundred investors in
attendance. The news caused considerable embarrassment for the Bush family. In the
following week, at the request of the Saudi ambassador to Washington Bandar Bin Sultan
(nicknamed Sultan Bush because of his close ties to the President’s family), and in
violation of the flight ban maintained by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), a
Boeing 747 from Saudi Arabian Airlines was allowed to leave the United States, carrying
140 Saudis, including Shafig bin Laden and twenty members of his family.
The idea of a conspiracy emanating from inside the Bush administration, which is
the common wisdom of the 9/11 Truth Movement, faces a major contradiction: if
the responsibility of Osama bin Laden is a prefabricated lie, so are the elements that
are potentially embarrassing for the Saudi state, and indirectly for the Bush family.
The involvement of the Bush clan in the organization of the September 11th scheme
(and not only in its cover-up) is probable, given the role played by the President’s
brother, Marvin Bush, and his cousin Wirt Walker III, through their company
Securacom; but the choice of bin Laden as a patsy does not seem very wise,
especially if the objective was to divert suspicion away from the Bush family. This
paradox can be resolved if we consider that a complex operation like 9/11, designed to
change dramatically the course of world history, necessarily involves several powerful
networks, whose interest do not necessarily coincide totally, and who hold each other
hostage after the operation. It is impossible, at this stage, to know exactly who knew what
and who did what, but it is easy to imagine that some people who signed in the plot (the
Bush clan, to speak broadly) were outsmarted by the real masterminds, believing that
they were allowing a limited harmless false flag (involving for example only two virtual
planes and an explosion in the Pentagon) for the limited purpose of invading Afghanistan
and get the UNOCAL project going, while the smartest guys (the neocons and their
Zionist network) raised the stakes by adding two planes into the WTC, and by forcing
Bush II into the Iraq invasion that Bush I had refused in 1991, bullying even Colin
Powell to support it by who knows what blackmail. It is hard to know where the greedy
Rumsfeld and Cheney stood in this configuration, but we can clearly see Cheney taking
over the government on 9/11, while the President has been pushed aside into a primary
classroom in Florida.
To get a grasp of the multi-purpose dimension of the 9/11 operation, remember that,
on September 10th, 2001, the day before the attacks, Donald Rumsfeld publicly
announced that $2.3 trillion were missing from the accounts of the Department of
Defense for the 2000 year (25% of its annual budget), in addition to $1.1 trillion missing
for 1999; just for comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses of
Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All this money evaporated
into thin air under the watch of William Cohen, Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton’s
second term. In 2001, the man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions
was Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and an
ordained rabbi. Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by financial analysts at
Resource Services Washington (RSW). Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by
“al-Qaeda” the following morning. The “hijackers” or Flight AA77, rather than hitting
the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose to attempt an impossible
downward spiral at 180° in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the
location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in their offices,
together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted in the biography of the team leader
Robert Russell for the National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial: “The weekend before his death,
his entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were celebrating the end
of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically, every person that attended that party
was involved in the Pentagon explosion, and are currently missing”.
[By an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to make sense of the
Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported to have died at the precise location
of his office, not because he was working there that day, but because he was on a
business trip on Flight AA77. In the words of the Washington Post database: “Bryan
C. Jack was responsible for crunching America’s defense budget.
He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official business in
California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would
have been at work at his computer”.]
It’s the Oil, stupid!
The strategy of blaming 9/11 on the Bushs’ business venture with the Saudis has
worked so far, since the 9/11 Truth Movement has pursued Bush and Cheney with
hostility while hardly breathing a word on Israel. Again, we see Machiavelli at work:
accomplish your dirty ends through the actions of another, then turn popular vengeance
against him. When, under mounting pressure from public opinion, the mainstream media
will be forced to abandon the official story, the protest movement will have been already
well infiltrated, and the slogan “9/11 was an inside job” will have prepared the public to
turn against Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, while the neocons will remain legally
untouchable. As for Israel’s implication, if it cannot be avoided, it will be minimized by
Chomsky’s good old sophistry, that Israel is after all only the 51st American State,
controlled from Washington, so that, whatever evil Israel does, it can always
claim:America made me do it.
[A particularly nasty and effective attempt to shift the blame away from Israel on Wall
Street has been performed by film producer Aaron Russo who, six months before
passing away from cancer, accused Nick Rockefeller (a minor and and very distant
figure in the dynasty, already dead by the time of Russo’s interview) of having
forwarned him of 9/11 one year in advance and explained it as part of the Wall Street
elite’s plan for a New World Order. Thus Russo was well prepared to meet Yahweh and
answer the question: “What did you do for my chosen people before you died?”]
For Chomsky, responsibility for the destabilization of the Middle East falls on
Washington, not Tel-Aviv. That the war in Iraq was for oil is, for him, so obvious that he
dismisses even the need to argue: “Of course it was Iraq’s energy resources. It’s not even
a question”[18].He has been joined by Alan Greenspan, director of the Federal Reserve,
who likewise concedes “what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil” (The
Age of Turbulence, 2007). Also among the supporters of the oil theory are
environmentalists; but for them too it seems more of a personal conviction rather than a
provable fact: “I personally believe that there is a deep relationship between the events of
9/11 and peak oil, but it’s not something I can prove”, admits Richard Heinberg, a
specialist in energy depletion, in the documentary Oil, Smoke and Mirrors.
[A Zionist in his youth, Noam Chomsky is now the guru of the radical left, who has
remained there to hold the ground, while other radical leftists like Irving Kristol moved
to the other far end of the political field.
Chomsky has always been hostile to any questioning of the official 9/11 story, as well
as, curiously, to the quest for the truth of the Kennedy assassination[19].]
[Chomsky’s alter-ego Howard Zinn takes a similar view of 9/11, known as the
“blowback theory”. His interview for The Real News can be summarized like this: “It’s
not important to investigate who did 9/11. What is important is to understand why bin
Laden did it? (i.e. why people hate America in the Middle East)”.]
The problem is that there is no indication that the oil lobby has encouraged the military
intervention in Iraq. What oil companies had asked, rather, was the lifting of sanctions
that prohibited them from dealing with Saddam’s Iraq — the same they are now asking
for Iran. Indeed, as James Petras has shown in Zionism, Militarism and the Decline of US
Power(2008), “‘Big Oil’ not only did not promote the invasion, but has failed to secure a
single oil field, despite the presence of 160,000 US troops, 127,000 Pentagon/State
Department paid mercenaries and a corrupt puppet régime”[20]. When in 2009 the
licenses for exploitation were auctioned, it was Russia and China who grabbed the lion’s
share, with even France’s Total coming ahead of U.S. companies.
Proponents of the oil thesis like to foreground Halliburton, which has doubled its income
in becoming the largest private contractor working for U.S. forces in Iraq. They rightly
accuse Dick Cheney of having personally gained $50 million in promoting Halliburton,
after having served as its CEO from 1995 to 2000. However, Halliburton and Cheney’s
personal gains in Iraq have little to do with a national strategy for control of natural
resources. Furthermore, Halliburton is not a petroleum company, but rather a civil
engineering company that provides services to oil companies, as well as to armies.
Besides, in the 1990s, even Halliburton (then under Cheney’s leadership) had called for
the lifting of sanctions on Iraq, Iran and Libya, and had even been charged a $3.8 million
fine for having bypassed said sanctions. Yes, Dick Cheney has blood on his bank account
— and he is not alone — but the United States of America as a whole won nothing in the
war in Iraq, which cost the American people a whopping $3 trillion, according to lowest
estimates (Joseph Stiglitz,The Three Trillion Dollar War, 2008). As for the Bushs,
renowned oil sharks, there is no indication that they stood to make personal financial
gain, not to mention the fact that the aggressiveness of neoconservative rhetoric against
Saudi Arabia has hurt their interests. No, the oil does not explain the war in Iraq, nor does
it explain the war in Afghanistan, nor does it explain the planned war against Iran. And it
certainly does not explain the extraordinary discipline of corporate medias in their
support of the 9/11 government myth.
[On the 4th of March, 2001, Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series The Lone
Gunmen, watched by 13 million Americans. Computer hackers working for a secret
cabal within the government hijack a jet by remote control with the intent to crash it
into one of the twin towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic
terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control of the plane. The
purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting
terrorism. Could this be another kind of “media vaccine”, meant to denigrate in
advance conspiracy theories as inspired by fiction?]
Israel’s false flag culture
Israel had the motive and the means for 9/11, but also the criminal history that goes with
it, which needs to be recalled here. Its terrorist networks and secret services have a grand
expertise in waging false flag attacks. Indeed, a world history of false flag operations
would have to dedicate at least half of its pages to modern Israel, a nation less than a
century old. The cast was formed even before the creation of the Jewish State, with the
bombing of the King David Hotel, the headquarters of the British authorities in
Jerusalem. The morning of July 22nd, 1946, six terrorists of the Irgun (the terrorist militia
commanded by Menachem Begin, future Prime Minister) dressed as Arabs entered the
building, and around the central pillar placed 225 kg of explosives hidden in milk churns,
while others spread explosives along the access roads to the hotel to prevent emergency
aid. When a British officer manifested his suspicion a gunfight broke out and the Irgun
members fled, but not before igniting the explosives. The explosion killed 91 people,
mostly British, but also 15 Jews.
The strategy was repeated in Egypt during the summer of 1954,
with OperationSusannah. The goal was to compromise the Brit’s withdrawal from the
Suez Canal, demanded by Colonel Abdul Gamal Nasser with support from President
Eisenhower. Egyptian Jews trained in Israel bombed several British targets, then placed
the blame on the Muslim Brotherhood, as to discredit Nasser in the eyes of the British
and the Americans, and to generate antipathy against Egypt. The accidental detonation of
an explosive device allowed the exposure of the conspiracy. The Defense Minister Pinhas
Lavon was held responsible, even though he placed the blame on Colonel Benjamin
Givli, Director of Military Intelligence (Aman). The scandal, known as the “Lavon
Affair”, was largely overlooked in the Israeli and American media, and it was not until
2005 that the State of Israel publicly acknowledged its responsibility.
The most infamous and calamitous Israeli false flag operation came in June 1967 with the
attack of the USS Liberty, an unarmed American vessel of the NSA stationed in
international waters, which was bombed, strafed and torpedoed for 75 minutes by the
Israeli army, with the obvious intent to leave no one alive on board, blaming the attack on
the Egyptians, and drawing the U.S. into a war that would have quickly escalated into a
new world war. I have already broached on this affair in an earlier article[21].
In 1986, Israel tried to make it seem that a series of terrorist orders were transmitted from
Libya to various Libyan embassies around the world. According to former agent Victor
Ostrovsky (By Way of Deception, 1990), the Mossad was using a special communication
system code named “Trojan Horse” hidden inside enemy territory by Mossad
commandos. The system acted as a relay station for faked transmissions originating from
an Israeli ship, immediately retransmitted on a radio frequency used by the Libyan state.
As the Mossad had hoped, the NSA intercepted and deciphered the transmissions, which
were then interpreted as evidence that the Libyans were supporting terrorism, evidence
that the Mossad would reinforce by providing the US more faked intelligence of their
own. Israel’s strategy relied on Reagan’s promise for retaliation against any country
caught in the act of supporting terrorism. As expected, the Americans fell into the trap,
dragging with them the British and the Germans: April 14th, 1986, 160 American
aircrafts dropped over sixty tons of bombs on Libya, targeting mainly airports and
military bases. Among the civilian casualties on the Libyan side was Gaddafi’s adopted,
four year old daughter.
[Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services (Shai in 1944, Shin Bet in 1948, Mossad
until 1963) predicted in 1980, to the Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic
terrorism would end up hitting America. “In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is
very important.]
Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the
phallic symbol they will hit”.[22] When repeating these words in 2004 (in an interview
with Deborath Calwell and in his book The American Prophecies, Terrorism and Mid-
East Conflict Reveal a Nation’s Destiny), hoped to make Harel pass as a prophet. It
seems more rational to conclude that 9/11 was an idea born thirty years earlier within
the Israeli Deep State.]
The manipulative capacity of the Mossad during that time can be further illustrated by
two stories analyzed by Thomas Gordon in Gideon’s Spies: the Secret History of the
Mossad(2009). On April 17th, 1986, a young Irish woman named Ann-Marie Murphy
boarded a flight from London to Tel Aviv, unknowingly carrying 1.5 pounds of Semtex.
The man who had given her the bag was her fiancé, a Pakistani named Nezar Hindaoui,
who was arrested while trying to find refuge at the Syrian Embassy. He had himself been
manipulated by the Mossad, who would achieve their desired result: the Thatcher
government broke off diplomatic relations with Syria.
In January 1987, the Palestinian Ismail Sowan, a Mossad mole who had infiltrated the
PLO in London, was entrusted, by someone claiming to work for his PLO superior, with
two suitcases packed with weapons and explosives. Ismail was informed of his Mossad
contact by phone, who told him to take the next flight to Tel Aviv, from where they sent
him back to London. What he didn’t know is that the Mossad simultaneously denounced
him to Scotland Yard as a suspect in a potential Islamist attack in London. He was picked
up on his return to Heathrow Airport and charged on the basis of weapons found at his
home. As a result, the Mossad found favor with the Thatcher government again.
A third story will make the pattern even clearer. After the attack of February 26th, 1993,
against the WTC, the FBI arrested the Palestinian Ahmed Ajaj and identified him as a
terrorist linked to Hamas, but the Israeli newspaper KolHa’ir showed that Ajaj had never
been involved with Hamas or the PLO. According to the journalist Robert Friedman,
author of an article in The Village Voice (August 3, 1993), Ajaj was actually nothing
more than a petty crook arrested in 1988 for forging currency, sentenced to two and a half
years in prison and released a year later thanks to a deal made with the Mossad, for whom
he would then infiltrate Palestinian groups. Upon his release, Ajaj underwent a
classic sheep-dipping by being once again briefly imprisoned, this time for trying to
smuggle weapons for the Fatah into the West Bank. We have, therefore, with the
bombing of the WTC in 1993, a prototype and precedent for September 11th, in which is
demonstrated the deep involvement of Israel in false flag terrorism.[23]
It is worth noting that, in December 1993, Philip Zelikow and John Deutch wrote an
article entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism” in Foreign Affairs, where they speculated on
what would have happened if the WTC bombing had been instead a nuclear attack: “An
act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or
disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a
watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property
unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security
within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or
perhaps even worse. […] Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future
into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures
scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects
and use of deadly force”.[24] Here we have, already, the reference to Pearl Harbor (a
code-word for “false pretext” for any informed person) that will be recycled in the
infamous September 2000 PNAC report Rebuilding America’s Defenses, where the
authors regret that “the process of transformation” they advocate for the military “is
likely to be a long one, absent of some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new
Pearl Harbor”.
The bombing of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 killed 29 and wounded
242. It was immediately blamed on Hezbollah using a truck bomb. But the judge in
charge concluded that the explosives had been placed inside the building, and revealed
pressures and false testimonies from American Jews and Israelis in order to contradict
him. When the Argentinian Supreme Court confirmed this thesis, Israeli diplomats
accused the judges of anti-Semitism.
The list of Israeli false flag operations goes on, and it must be remembered that only the
failed ones can be documented. On January 12th, 2000, according to the Indian
magazineThe Week, officers of Indian Intelligence arrested at Calcutta airport eleven
Islamist preachers who were preparing to board a flight to Bangladesh. They were
suspected of belonging to al-Qaeda and of intending to hijack the plane. They presented
themselves as Afghans who had stayed in Iran before spending two months in India to
preach Islam. Unfortunately for their story, they all had Israeli passports. The officer of
the Indian Intelligence services told The Week that Tel Aviv “exerted considerable
pressure” on Delhi to secure their release.[25]
On October 12th, 2000, in the final weeks of Clinton’s presidency, the destroyer USS
Coleen route to the Persian Gulf, was ordered from its homeport of Norfolk to refuel in
the port of Aden in Yemen — a rather unusual procedure since these destroyers are
generally supplied by a Navy tanker at sea. The captain of the ship expressed his surprise
and concern: the Cole had recently filled up at the entrance of the Suez Canal, not to
mention the fact that Yemen is a hostile zone. The USS Cole was in a docking maneuver
when it was approached by a garbage disposal dinghy, which then exploded against the
hull, killing 17 sailors and wounding 50. The two “suicide bombers” driving the dinghy
also perished. The attack was immediately blamed on al-Qaeda, even though bin Laden
did not take responsibility and the Taliban denied that he could have been involved. The
accusation gave the United States a pretext to force the Yemeni President Ali Abdullah
Saleh to cooperate in the fight against anti-imperialist Islamism, by closing three
paramilitary camps on its territory. What’s more, a few weeks before the elections, the
attack would become the October Surprise that brought Bush to power.
John O’Neill was put in charge of the investigation. An experienced counter-terrorism
specialist at the FBI for twenty years, he had already investigated the WTC bombing in
1993. His team came to suspect that Israel had fired a missile from a submarine: the hole
was indeed indicative of that type of munitions and inexplicable by the explosion of one
dinghy. President Saleh shared the suspicions, and spoke in an interview
with Newsweekregarding possibility that the attack was due to Israel, “trying to spoil the
U.S.-Yemeni Relationship”.[26] O’Neill and his team suffered the hostility of the U.S.
Ambassador Barbara Bodine and were forbidden to dive to fully inspect the damage.
Finally, taking advantage of their trip home for Thanksgiving, Bodine refused them
reentry to Yemen. The crew of the USS Cole was directed not to speak about the attack
except to Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). In July 2001, O’Neill resigned
from the FBI. He was soon after offered a position as head of security at the WTC that he
was to hold from September 11th, 2001. His body was found in the rubble of the WTC
after been missing for two days. As for Barbara Bodine, in 2003 she would integrate the
corrupt team of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Baghdad, under Lewis Paul
Bremer.
Where does the list end? The New York Times and other news outlet reported that, on
the 19th of September 2005, British SAS (part of the Special Forces) used tanks
assisted by helicopters to tear down the prison of Basra in order to liberate two of its
agents who were arrested on the same day after having forced a checkpoint, dressed as
Arabs in a car full of arms, munitions, explosives and detonators. It is believed they
were part of a false flag terror unit planning to explode bombs during a religious event
in the center of Basra, in order to exacerbate religious conflits between Shiits and
Sunnites. Captain Masters, in charge of the investigation, died in Basra on the 15th of
October.
Also see:
• “The machiavellian threefold game of the neoconservatives”
• Nine Eleven IS the LitmusTest
• 9/11 and Israel: Exclusive Interview With Dr Alan Sabrosky
End Notes:
[1] http://il.linkedin.com/in/yaronshmuel
[2] https://www.facebook.com/shmuel.yaron?fref=ts
[1] www.corriere.it/politica/07_novembre_30/osama_berlusconi_cossiga_27f4ccee-9f55-
11dc-8807-0003ba99c53b.shtml
[2] “Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of
Mistake”,http://mycatbirdseat.com/2011/06/demystifying-911-israel-and-the-tactics-ofmistake/
[3] Rowan Scarborough, “U.S. troops would enforce peace Under Army study”, The
Washington Times, 10 septembre
2001,http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2001/sep/10/20010910-025319-6906r/).
[4] Raimondo, however, carefully avoids denying Al-Qaeda’s responsibility for the
attacks, certainly for strategic reasons.
[5] See also Christopher Ketcham, “What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11
Attacks?” CounterPunch, 2007, vol. 14, p. 1-
10,http://www.counterpunch.org/2007/03/07/what-did-israel-know-in-advance-of-the-9-
11-attacks/)
[6] The full report is on http://antiwar.com/rep/DEA_Report_redactedxx.pdf. It is quoted
here from Raimondo and Bollyn’s books. Bollyn’s book can also be read online on his
site: http://www.bollyn.com/
[7] Robert Worth, “Lebanese in Shock Over Arrest of an Accused Spy”,
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/world/middleeast/19lebanon.html?_r=0
Sur la petite amie d’Atta, voir http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAZkRq8m1xo
[9] Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the
World, 2012,p. 278-280.
[10] www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OyUoGUV7b8&feature=youtu.be.
[11] This report has been thouroughly analyzed by French investigative reporter Hicham
Hamza in Israël et le 11 Septembre : le Grand Tabou, Amazon kindle, 2010, and are
fully reproduced on the 6 following webpages:
https://hichamhamza.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/doc-1-62392807-1138796-001-303ank-
105536-section-1-944861.pdf
https://hichamhamza.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/doc-2-62393381-1138796-001-303ank-
105536-section-2-944876.pdf
https://hichamhamza.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/doc-3-62394063-1138796-001-303ank-
105536-section-3-944880.pdf
Israeli agents are experts at provoking Sunni vs Shiite confrontation and exploitation of
conflict
Another Point of View:
ISIS and al-Qaeda, two sides of the same US-minted coin
• font size
• Print
• Add new comment
The self-styled Jihadi groups that have unleashed terrorism on a grand scale in Syria are
without the least doubt on the payroll of the US and the Zionists, as part of the intricate
plot to distort the image of Islam. Recently, the CIA-created outfit, al-Qa’eda, said the socalled
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, known by its abbreviations ISIS, is too extreme.
It seems to be a classic case of the kettle calling the pot black, which analysts believe to
be nothing but a clumsy effort to deceive public opinion. Let us read what the prominent
US critics of the supposed war on terror Dr. Kevin Barrett has to say in this regard.
Colonel Michael Aquino is a man of remarkable achievements. He was expelled from the
Church of Satan for being too evil – and then, after being prosecuted and miraculously
acquitted of horrific child abuse, was promoted to head all US military psychological
operations programs. This makes us recall that when the late Founder of the Islamic
Republic of Iran, Grand Ayatollah (Imam) Ruhollah Khomeini, called the US
government “the Great Satan” he was not kidding. Getting kicked out of the Church of
Satan for being too evil – now THAT is impressive. But the militant group ISIS has
managed an equally impressive feat: It has been expelled from al-Qaeda for being ‘too
extremist’ in its approach to terrorism. Brookings terror expert William McCants told the
New York Times in this regard: “ISIS is now officially the biggest and baddest global
jihadi group on the planet. Nothing says ‘hard-core’ like being cast out by al-Qaeda.”
This means the US government, which protests that it is only helping the “good
terrorists” rather than the “bad terrorists” in Syria, will now have to add a third group to
the list: the “really, REALLY bad terrorists.”
The American people, terrorized by media propaganda into believing they could be
blown up or mailed US government anthrax by al-Qaeda at any moment, must be
shivering with dread. A new global jihadi group is out there that even al-Qaeda finds
terrifying! What is the US government doing to protect its citizens from the likes of ISIS?
Americans might be surprised to learn that the US government and its allies appear to be
arming ISIS, encouraging it, and pushing it to commit ever-more-extreme acts of
senseless terrorism. Back in 2010, when ISIS was known as al-Qaeda in Iraq or AQI, the
world learned that key US ally Saudi Arabia was funding the “al-Qaeda” terrorists.
Former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen cited US intelligence sources:
“The King of Saudi Arabia has strongly criticized the country’s intelligence officials for
disclosing a secret document, which shows Riyadh has links with terrorist activities
carried out by al-Qaeda in Iraq. King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz ordered a special
committee to investigate the intelligence leak and inform him about those liable in the
case. Some 37 members of Saudi’s intelligence service, accused of being behind the
leakage of the confidential document, were also reported to have been arrested.”
Saudi Arabia isn’t the only US Mideast ally supporting al-Qaeda and its offshoots. On
December 5th 2002, the BBC cited Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon claiming that al-
Qaeda was active in Gaza: “We know that they are there.” Three days later, the BBC
reported that Palestinian authorities had caught Israeli agents creating fake “al-Qaeda”
cells in Gaza. No wonder Sharon knew they were there! This was not, alas, the first time
that Israel had set up a fake “al-Qaeda” cell. The Hamburg “al-Qaeda” group around
Mohammed Atta was apparently infiltrated and taken over by Israeli intelligence, which
used a Hebrew-speaking Atta double and at least two doubles of long-time Mossad asset
Ziad Jarrah, among other impersonators, as it set up the (barely) plausible patsies for the
9/11/2001 false flag operation.
Those interested in learning how Muslim patsies were framed for 9/11 should start with
three books: The Hidden History of 9/11, edited by Paul Zarembka; Hijacking America’s
Mind on 9/11 by Elias Davidsson; and Welcome to Terrorland by Daniel Hopsicker.
And it isn’t just the Saudis and Israelis. The US and the West in general appear to be
sponsoring “radical Islamic terrorism” all over the world – and the more extreme the
better. In Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai has charged US forces of carrying out the
worst terrorist atrocities in his country and trying to blame them on the Taliban. The
Washington Post reports that Karzai has provided “a list of dozens of (false-flag) attacks
that he believes the US government may have been involved in…The list even includes
the recent bomb and gun assault on a Lebanese restaurant in Kabul, one of the bloodiest
acts targeting the international community in Afghanistan, the official said. The attack,
which left 21 people dead, including three Americans, was almost universally attributed
to the Taliban.”
Karzai believes the US is committing false-flag terrorism in Afghanistan in order to
destabilize the country. That also appears to be a goal of Western-sponsored false-flag
terror in Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. Even al-Qaeda leader Ayman az-Zawahiri has
suggested that some of the most extreme terrorism attributed to ISIS (previously known
as AQI) is false-flag. In September 2005, az-Zawahiri wrote a letter questioning AQI’s
indiscriminate attacks on Shi’a Muslim civilians; and in 2007 he said that “traitors”
posing as AQI were responsible for the ongoing terror onslaught against Iraqi civilians.
So the recent split between al-Qaeda and ISIS has a long and bloody history. Why is the
West encouraging and even creating the bloodiest, most vicious “Islamic terror” groups?
For the same reason police plant agent-provocateurs in the ranks of demonstrators: To
destabilize the protest groups, turn the public against them, and allow the police to crush
them. The anti-globalization movement was hamstrung by agent-provocateurs in black
ski masks, who would suddenly begin smashing windows and committing violent acts.
This would give the police an excuse to beat and arrest protestors and shut down the
demonstrations. The media would then broadcast images of the false-flag violence, and
dutifully report that “violent protests” had been quashed and order restored. The Zionistled,
bankster-ruled West is terrified of the Islamic Awakening. So they are planting
agents provocateurs in the ranks of Islamic militants to provoke violence, extremism, and
sectarianism – and to turn the Western and global publics against Islam, and justify a fake
“war on terror” that is actually a war on Islam. So when a bunch of terrorists get kicked
out of al-Qaeda because their terrorism is too extreme, we may safely assume that they
are agents provocateurs, working to destabilize the Middle East on behalf of the global
bankster elite.
LikeLike · · Share
•
Susan Kentwell, Corren Garavanta and 4 others like this.
•
1 share
•
Corren Garavanta I read today Isis is Islamic State of Iraq & Syria… Since when?
Isis. comeon! Cant get any more blatant
http://www.theweek.co.uk/…/mayhem-in-iraq-don-t-expect…
June 13 at 7:32pm · Like · 1
•
Craig Workman Its interesting that its only popped up on the mainstream medias
radar in the past few days, when this has been going on for months
June 13 at 7:50pm · Edited · Like · 1
•
Will Crain I just posted yesterday on someone else’s link that I believe this ISIS to
be a front group that is to consolidate a Califate that will then declare war on
Israel…. Then lose, convincingly.
Allowing Israel to annex the regions, therefore opening up the expansion of the
“Greater Israel Plan”.
June 13 at 8:11pm · Like · 1
•
Hanneke Thesame http://english.irib.ir/…/178909-isis-and-al-qaeda,-two… CIA??
June 13 at 11:05pm · Like · 3
•
Will Crain Not much difference between the CIA and Mossad.
Except for the addresses.
June 13 at 11:13pm · Like · 3
•
Julie Hall Hanneke you are a gem
June 14 at 8:15am · Like
•
Will Crain It just like the Libyan Gold Dinar was the Endgame of the Arab
Spring.
June 14 at 8:20am · Like · 2
•
Julie Hall http://apps.washingtonpost.com/…/map-how-isis-is…/1095/
MAP: How ISIS is carving out a new country
apps.washingtonpost.com
As the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) continues to seize cities in Iraq,…
See More
June 14 at 9:14am · Like · 2
•
Will Crain http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the…/5324815
June 14 at 12:49pm · Like · 1
•
Will Crain Check out the maps.
June 14 at 12:49pm · Like · 1
•
Julie Hall http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/The-Latest-911-NAZI…
Tom Heneghan Explosive Intelligence Briefings
www.tomheneghanbriefings.com
tom heneghan,NSA,Nazi Paperclip,DHS,false
flag,constitution,treason,wanta,syria,protocols,bush,nazi,zionist,mossad,benghazi,
terrorist,adamus group
Yesterday at 11:55am · Like · 1
•
Julie Hall @ the 22 second mark with the man wearing orange.Abu Bakir al-
Baghdadi is Major Nidal Hasan Ft Hood shooter in 2009
IMO both incidences are covering up a larger crime using the same fall guy.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv5rQXZR6Og…
‘I Will See You Guys In New York’, ISIS Leaders Last Words to US Troops!
The current leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) had some chil…
See More
Yesterday at 11:58am · Edited · Like · 1
•
Julie Hall http://www.npr.org/…/120206378/the-shootings-at-fort-hood
The Shootings At Fort Hood
www.npr.org
Fort Hood remains in mourning as the community looks for answers to why an
Army … See More
Views: 1
Posted in 
Tags: 
