By
Michael Portillo
Last updated at 12:32 AM on 5th January 2012
Tribute: Michael Portillo believes he owes everything to his education at Harrow County for Boys
This was surely one of the most original excuses ever heard for non-attendance at a gathering.
Ten years ago, I went to a reunion of staff and former pupils from my old grammar school, Harrow County for Boys, which was based in north-west London.
The happy centrepiece of the evening was a tribute to a much-loved master, Harry Rees, who was finally retiring after years of devoted service, not only in teaching history but also in staging school drama productions.
The farewell took the format of the popular TV show This Is Your Life, though, in reference to Harry’s work in drama, it was entitled This Is Your Backstage Life.
At one stage during the proceedings, which were full of fond reminiscences, the organiser said: ‘Now Harry there is one boy you might remember from about 30 years ago, who was a dab hand at painting scenery for your sets.
‘Unfortunately he cannot be with us tonight,’ continued the organiser, pausing for effect…
‘Because he is in Sweden — receiving the Nobel Prize for Medicine.’
The explanation was absolutely true. The boy in question was none other than the brilliant scientist Sir Paul Nurse, now President of the Royal Society and in 2001 the recipient of the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on cell structures.
Standards
And it was right that Sir Paul should be mentioned, even in his absence, at our reunion, because his rise to the pinnacle of scientific achievement reflected the high academic standards of the school.
I was reminded of my affection for the place when I recently participated in a new documentary series on the history of grammar schools, the first episode of which will be shown on BBC Four tonight.
Forgiven! Sir Paul Nurse was absent from the reunion as he was in Sweden receiving the Nobel Prize for his work on cell structures
Like so many other grammar schools that flourished in Britain before they were abolished through a mix of ideology and political folly, Harrow County was a fiercely competitive institution, where all boys were taught to strive for excellence.
It was precisely because of this demanding regime that results were so good. Funded by the state, the school gave bright boys a magnificent start in life, no matter how disadvantaged their backgrounds.
As the BBC programme shows, the grammars like Harrow County were true engines of social mobility for working-class pupils fortunate enough to win places at them. Indeed, Sir Paul Nurse himself is a classic example of this pattern.
He was brought up in Wembley by his grandparents — his grandfather was a mechanic in the local Heinz factory and his grandmother was a cleaner.
Yet from these modest beginnings he became one of the world’s greatest geneticists, thanks partly to the influence of Harrow County.
I, too, feel I owe a huge debt to the school, for I am also from an unconventional background. My own father was a refugee from the Spanish civil war in the 1930s, later going on to become a BBC radio producer after World War II.
Having passed my 11-plus exam, the selective test that decided whether pupils would go to the elite grammars or the less academically orientated secondary moderns, I was lucky enough to study there between 1964 and 1971, before winning a place at Cambridge University.
Founded in 1911 at the zenith of Britain’s imperial grandeur, Harrow County was consciously modelled on the English public school — not surprisingly since not far down the road was Harrow, one of the most renowned establishments in England and the alma mater of Winston Churchill.
The customs of Harrow County reflected this traditionalist public-school ethos.
Example: Harrow County for Boys was deliberately modelled on a public school – famous Harrow (above) was just down the road
There was a powerful house structure, with the head boy and prefects at the top of the pupil hierarchy. To denote his status, the head boy wore a gown with sleeves, while prefects donned sleeveless gowns.
Latin was compulsory in the early years and Greek was still on the curriculum. Rugby, the gentlemen’s game, was played, rather than soccer.
When I arrived in 1964, the school still had a strongly authoritarian atmosphere, thanks to the tough-minded headmaster Dr Simpson, who firmly believed in corporal punishment. Fortunately, when Dr Simpson retired the next year, the cane was phased out, though discipline remained strong.
What was most striking about the school was its superb academic record, reflected in the phenomenal levels of attainment in public exams. In the year I left, no fewer than 22 pupils won places at Oxford and Cambridge, with all but one of them gaining either a scholarship or an exhibition [a kind of scholarship].
Superb: Harrow County had a phenomenally successful academic record, and many went on to study at Oxbridge
This record was achieved not through lavish facilities or state-of-the art equipment.
Indeed, Harrow County’s site was quite cramped, many of the buildings were Edwardian and, in my final years, the classroom furniture was incredibly shabby.
No, academic success was reached through two factors.
One was the ferociously competitive culture of learning in the school. Harrow County was unashamedly elitist, with pupils divided into streams according to their ability.
Dedication
The brighter ones were encouraged to take their O-levels a year early, so that they would pass sooner into the huge sixth form, which had more than 300 pupils.
In practice, therefore, we had three years to prepare for our A-levels and university exams.
The other vital factor was the high calibre and dedication of the teaching staff. All of them were extremely bright and prepared us meticulously.
I had one history teacher called Mr D’Arcy who produced duplicated, closely typed sheets of information on every conceivable subject that could come up as an exam question, from the origins of World War I to the arguments for the 1832 Reform Act. In all, he made about 200 of these beautifully written summaries, a monument to his diligence.
But it was not all work.
The school was also strong in sports, especially in cricket.
Starring role: Diana Abbott was one of the Harrow girls who featured in some of our plays
Moreover, all pupils either had to be in the Boy Scouts or the Combined Cadet Force (CCF). One enjoyable consequence of being in the Scouts was that, at the start of each new school year, we had to camp out in tents on the school playing fields.
It was also a tradition that we all had to wear either our Scouts or CCF uniforms every Friday in term time.
But the non-academic activity I enjoyed by far the most was the drama — though I was more of a producer than an actor. For those of us in the sixth form, the great attraction of dramatics was that we would stage co-productions with the local grammar school for girls.
One of the Harrow girls who featured in some of our plays was none other than Diane Abbott, now the Labour MP for Hackney and the first black woman elected to Parliament.
Surprisingly, she was a quite shy as a teenager, though she was a good actress.
I look back on my schooldays with a warm glow of nostalgia.
They were wonderful times. There was no unpleasantness in the school, no bullying or vicious gangs. Indeed, even though this was the late Sixties, I don’t recall any drugs.
We were certainly aware of the social revolution that was taking place across Britain, especially in music and politics. I was actually a youthful supporter of the Labour Party then, but there was no hint of angry rebellion in the air.
I was lucky enough to make a number of great friends at Harrow County, including the TV presenter Clive Anderson, who was just as funny and quick-witted as a boy as he is today.
I was also close to Geoffrey Perkins, the BBC comedy producer who sadly died a couple of years ago, and Sir Nigel Sheinwald, who has just stepped down as Britain’s ambassador to the USA.
Those were the days: Michael Portillo (centre) attended Harrow County for Boys with Clive Anderson
Sadly Harrow County, like so many other grammar schools, disappeared in the 1970s when it was amalgamated with other local schools to form what was known as Gayton High School, later to be renamed Harrow High in 1998 when it became fully co-educational.
The demise of the grammar schools was a tragedy for this country, robbing the brightest working-class children of the chance to be educated to the highest level.
Betrayed
The absurdity of the grammars’ abolition was that the politicians were addressing the wrong problem. Instead of tackling the failure of the old secondary moderns, they attacked the one part of the school system that worked well.
The paradox today is that no major political party would dare to campaign to bring back grammar schools, yet where they still exist, such as Kent or Buckinghamshire, no front-rank politician would dare to advocate their abolition, because they are so cherished by parents.
But at least the new Education Secretary Michael Gove is moving in the right direction, through the creation of free schools and academies which will undermine the miserable, dead-hand of central bureaucracy. The sadness is that, over recent decades, so many children have been betrayed by political dogma.
The Grammar School: A Secret History is on BBC Four tonight at 9pm
Share this article:
Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
I went to both a Technical School and then to a Grammar School , both of which were good schools .
Then came this ridiculous notion of not wanting to hurt peoples feelings :
Now everyone was supposed to dumb themselves down , so little Freddie who had no desire to better himself wouldn’t feel bad !!
Then came sport , no one was allowed to win , in case Fat Freda felt bad because she would rather eat doughnuts , than get off her behind and compete !!
This is what comes of listening to Lefties , especially the comfortable shoe female variety .
Report abuse
But no one tells the other side of the story – what happened to those who got dumped in Secondary Modern Schools when they had passed the 11+ and should have been in Grammar Schools. It wasnt all sweetness and light and there was no opportunity to be moved. I was forced into an SM school, was told if I worked I would be placed in a grammar school at 13 but when the time came I was told that there were no places and it was unfair to make one of the grammar kids who wasnt making the grade leave so I could go – so there! It had a knock on effect in my education too, even though I have a degree and a Ph.D I was one of the few but I also know the ” hidden history” and cost but thats always glossed over. The real failure was not having places for those who wanted to go. and not ditching the kids out who shouldnt have been in grammer schools when they proved unworthy of that education. .
Report abuse
Spot on Mike from KL. I also went to a grammar school in the 50s which educated me rather than trained me. I also didn’t pay enough attention and perhaps didn’t reach my potential as a result BUT that time gave me the insight to learn more through my lfe and understand education for it’s ownsake. Having said that I know many who did not go to a grammar school (both my brothers for example) who have carved brilliant careers out wth their seconday school and technical college educations. The problem wth comprehensive eduction is that all abilites and types of mind are mixed together and a norm is sought. You can only standardise one way. DOWN. All the old schools were selctive inasmuch as people were asessed as to their strengths, literary,technical, numerical or artisan and slotted in where it best suited them. And none of us needs a calculator to add up or communicates by grunt.
Report abuse
I went to grammer school and did well in life wearing a suit and tie ,my two best friends went to secondry modern and went on to own buisnesses in “trade” both have children at university and both made lots of money with their own buisneses,whats so wrong with the old system? it worked for us.
Report abuse
Our useless backtracking prime minister wants to abolish our remaing grammar schools.He is a priviliged out of touch toff,who having a bought education and doors opened wants to pull up the ladder for others of much greater intelect than himself.
Report abuse
Britian is finished who cares, its become a hell hole full of fools.
Report abuse
The reason why no political party is campaigning for the return of grammar schools is because that would see the return of secondary modern schools as well. Grammar schools typically had more money to spend per pupil than secondary moderns. It is no wonder that their results were better. Grammar schools also tended to be in the better parts of towns, and therefore did not have to cater for as many disruptive pupils. In the town where I live, there is a first-class grammar school and a first-rate comprehensive alongside it – such towns are very rare in England. If the coalition and Michael Gove are really striving for equality of opportunity for all pupils, then there is no need for grammar schools. It is all very well to wallow in nostalgia, but Mr Portillo is forgetting a lesson from his English class – “The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it”. We must move on.
Report abuse
And how about fair funding for English kids while we’re at it? Currently English kids get less per person per year than Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish kids. The UK government discriminates against the English – why do the English just take it?
Report abuse
A glorious education at Queen Elizabeths Grammar School for Boys in Mansfield in the 1950’s, at which I shamefully did not work hard enough, except cricket and swimming. Education is the major item that I still feel indebted to the UK, and the freedom it gave me.
Report abuse
Our useless backtracking prime minister wants to abolish our remaing grammar schools.He is a priviliged out of touch toff,who having a bought education and doors opened wants to pull up the ladder for others of much greater intelect than himself.
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.