GOD cursed the Jews out of Jerusalem for life, for practising Satanism. Jesus Christ tried to preach the word of God, but the antichrist crucified him for it.

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D. The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating, killing, thieving, kidnapping children, poisoning wells, and undermining the Christian faith.

ONCE WE UNITE We can stand up against those that keep seeking to divide us, with false news, and staged terrorist attacks. Together we can stop working for them, stop paying taxes, bills, fees, fraudulent debt etc. The end of the fiat currency that is used to enslave us begins. No more slavery, debt poverty terrorism illness evil and control e.t.c.

REAL MUSLIMS are never ever shown on TV News networks.  The Muslims you see on TV are the Jews dressed as Muslims, defaming them, to spread racism and hate among us. Wake up and stop hating false enemies that the Jews invent for us to focus on.

OUR NATURE IS SOVEREIGN (we are born free) and so, obviously, God wants us to be liberated from earthly rulers.

Jews were behind the Crucades, Ku Klux Klan, Spanish Inquisition, killing millions of real Christians, in the name of God, hiding behind the Roman Catholic Church (Vatican) spreading Terror... just like they are now doing to the Islamic religion.

JUDAISM = ZIONISM today, started way back in 740bc when the Amalek Edomite Khazarian Turks (now called JEWS), converted to Judaism for political reasons. A stolen identity and history, now needs a name to become complete, so the term "Jew" was invented in 1770. All history and so called "holy books" were re-written to accomodate the lies, to create the Satanic Jew... which has nothing to do with Israelite Hebrews.

HATE CRIMES. Today, the whole world already knows that U.S.A, England and Israel (Rothschild & Co.) plans attacks and wars, using proxy regimes in every country, (so no one blames the Jews) tying them to the dates of Jewish holidays. It’s been noticed that not only terrorist attacks and military operations are planned on Jewish holidays, but also carrying out those terrorist attacks is planned so that the funerals from the attacks would fall on the feasts of the Jews

THE AGENDA: To destroy Christianity, just as they have destroyed empires, nations, heterosexual identities and nuclear families. The agenda is to strip people of power, control, unity, identity and health, leaving us defenceless in the face of a Jewish One-World Tyranny.

JUDAISM = SATANISM is the only religion that have sex (thrusting their pelvis) when they pray to Sex Goddess Shekinah. Jews today continue to murder Christian and non-Jewish children to use their blood in Jewish rituals and holidays

The invention of the Muslim Terrorist is the latest invention by the Jews, to spread fear and dismantle governments that are not yet puppets of the Jews...or have decided to stop serving the Jews.. justifying raping the World, and slaughtering billions of innocent genuine semite and gentile families in every country for power and control annually... under the illusion of Freedom, Democracy, War on Terror, or anything else that can justify their invasions and mass murders for their 2 horned God.

Jewish Rabbi claims Islam is Israel's broom
"We control Islam, and we'll use it to destroy the west."

1.PROBLEM 2.REACTION 3.SOLUTION.

The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Problem, Reaction, Solution, is a Jew conjuring trick within their forever wandering diaspora in order to play the victim, and influence global changes in laws to protect all their historic and contemporary lies ……Who still falls for this old Yiddish trick manipulating policy changes to hide and protect Jewish crimes, acting out Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution against the gentile, changes which gives (((them))) immunity when hiding the truth.

Jews killing Christian Arabs again for their 2 horned God

Everyone was talking about Jesus! But when it came time to speak up for him in public, no one said a word. All were afraid of the Jews. Fear can stifle our witness. Although many people talk about Christ in church, when it comes to making a public statement about their faith, they are often embarrassed. Jesus says that he will acknowledge us before God if we acknowledge Him before others.

All 'Jews' today are the Khazars (converts) and Edomites, some call them the Khazarian Mafia (KM) hellbent on a World Government, as was the ruling Jewish class in the times of Jesus. Herod was an Edomite, after Esau ( Malachi 1: 3 ; Romans 9:13 ), not Jacob Israel. These Jew Fraudsters believe themelves to be Israelites (Hebrews) or from the royal tribe of Judah, claim the Bible Consignor gives themselves mandate to rule the whole world ( Psalm 2: 6-9 , Psalm 2: 10-11 , Deuteronomy 20: 10-14 , Deuteronomy 20 : 12-17 , Isaiah 60: 5 , 60: 10-11 , 60:12 , 60: 14-16 ,Psalm 2: 8 ; ), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah, most of the apostles were Israelites, only one of them was Jewish; Judas. The first time Jews are Mentioned in the Bible, is in II Kings 16: 6105: 44 ; 111: 6 ). Jesus was a Galilean or resident of Galilee ( Matthew 26:69 ; John 7:41 (and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war with the Jews and drave the Jews from elathane. The 'Jews' in 'Jesus' time were Edomites/Turkic Mongols/Khazars/Amalak/Gog/Magog. Edom or Edomite had BEEN translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated IDUMAEANS-Judean into Iewes. The first "Jews" were Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite.Source

Netanyahu marches in Soviet parade with Putin

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 540 other followers

Source Article from https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/09/21/netanyahu-marches-in-soviet-parade-with-putin/

Related Posts
Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/09/16/reaction-to-declassification-of-memos-showing-us-hushed-up-soviet-massacre/
Alex Jones may have been a Soviet asset all along A capture of Jones’ Russian visa
By Timothy Fitzpatrick August 26, 2019 Anno Domini The above Capital Research Center mini documentary,
The total destruction of that city, and the instant incineration of 40,000 mostly civilian people,

Hits: 6

Facebook to Launch ‘Independent Supreme Court’ Body to Monitor Its Content

What’s behind the Facebook Independent Supreme Court?

Facebook has announced the formation of a new Oversight Board which will be in charge of content moderation on the social media giant’s platform. The new body was known previously and colloquially as the Facebook Independent Supreme Court. This nickname is apt for many reasons.

Facebook is not a private company but a quasi-governmental organization, and I use the word ‘quasi’ very generously in this context. Facebook has a background of accepting Military Intelligence seed money.

Its suspicious inception date suggests it is a continuation of DARPA’s LifeLog surveillance program. Like many big companies in the corporatocracy, FB has a revolving door at the top, accepting many former government officials (like Nick Clegg quoted below) into senior management positions.

Then, there is its cosy relationship with the Atlantic Council, which is in turn funded by the US Government and is connected to NATO.

Facebook unveiled the plan for the board which includes giving it the power to moderate all content – including presumably the ability to demote, censor and ban. But how independent will this board be? What does this mean for free speech and censorship?

The Composition of the Facebook Independent Supreme Court

This Oversight Board will be funded by another body (the Facebook Trust). Initially, Facebook will be doing everything: funding the Trust, choosing the trustees of the Trust and placing all the initial 11 members on the Oversight Board. Independent, you may ask? RT reports:

“Facebook insists it is “committed to selecting a diverse and qualified group” – no current or former Facebook employees or spouses thereof, current government officials or lobbyists (former ones are apparently OK), high-ranking officials within political parties (low-ranking is apparently cool), or significant shareholders of Facebook need apply.

“A law firm will be employed to vet candidates for conflicts of interest, but given Facebook’s apparent inability to recognize the conflict of interest inherent in paying “independent” board members to make binding content decisions, it’s hard to tell what would qualify as a conflict.”

Setting an Industry Standard for Content Moderation, i.e. Censorship

Facebook has been under scrutiny and pressure for years now, especially for its disregard and invasion of privacy, as well as its perceived violation of anti-trust law. CEO Zuckerberg even called for Congress to regulate FB. This move is likely an attempt to self-regulate in the hopes that it avoids heavy-handed governmental regulation.

Former British politician and now VP Global Affairs and Communications, Nick Clegg, wrote that the “Oversight Board will make Facebook more accountable and improve our decision-making … This charter is a critical step towards what we hope will become a model for our industry.”

Is this Facebook Independent Supreme Court yet another attempt (alongside organizations like the Soros-linked International Fact Checking Network, and the Neocon and Atlantic Council-linked Newsguard) to set up some kind of authoritative body who decides what is true and false, right and wrong, allowed and disallowed for every single online user? Will they begin to ‘rule by precedent’ in banning certain kinds fo speech? How much chance will a small average user have to appeal?

Here is RT again:

““For now,” only Facebook-initiated cases will be heard by the board – Facebook users will be able to launch their own appeals by mid-2020 … Decisions will not only be binding, but also applicable to other cases not being heard, if they’re deemed similar enough – potentially opening a Pandora’s box of far-reaching censorship.”

All the Big Tech giants are trying new ad transparency measures, however it may mostly be for show, as the article Facebook’s New ‘Supreme Court’ Could Revolutionize Online Speech highlights:

“Facebook, Google, and Twitter have all recently unveiled ad transparency measures; meanwhile the proposed Honest Ads Act, which would compel these sorts of disclosures, has made little progress in Congress. This is despite extensive reporting about weaknesses in Facebook’s ad transparency tools.”

Trying to Shift the Censorship Buck

It would be a PR victory for Facebook if it could blame censorship (or in Orwellian language ‘difficult content moderation decisions’) on an outside and supposedly independent board. The same article describes Facebook’s motivations here:

“There is also the user-relations dimension. When Zuckerberg first floated the idea in April, I analogized Zuckerberg’s desire for restraint to the voluntarily segregated hotels and restaurants that counterintuitively supported anti-discrimination legislation during the Civil Rights Movement.

“They did so because they would earn more profits if they provided their services to everyone, but would pay a social cost in their white communities if they decided to voluntarily stop discriminating. Content moderation decisions on Facebook are hard and any call is likely to upset a proportion of Facebook users. By outsourcing the decision and blame, Facebook can try to wash its hands of controversial decisions.”

Final Thoughts

Facebook has become the data mining and surveillance arm of the New World Order. Zuckerberg called the people ‘dumb fucks’ who handed over their personal information to Facebook early on. Earlier this year, Facebook’s lawyers argued that Facebook users have no “reasonable expectation of privacy.”

At one point, Facebook promoted the idea of an internet driver’s license and wanted to be the one to supply unique internet IDs – just to ensure the tracking and tracing of society went even further.

There was the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal where that company harvested the personal and psychographic data from millions of peoples’ FB profiles without their consent to used it for political advertising. Just recently, smart TVs were caught sending sensitive user data to Facebook.

The scandals truly never end for this privacy-destroying, free-speech squashing, military-intelligence-government-linked company. A Facebook Independent Supreme Court? Don’t expect it to be anything other than another tool of censorship and control.

By Makia Freeman, HumansAreFree.com

Source Article from http://humansarefree.com/2019/09/facebook-to-launch-independent-supreme.html

Related Posts
By Makia Freeman THE STORY: On September 17th 2019, Facebook released a charter for a
The Spanish Supreme Court has recently delivered a historic verdict banning all activities relates to
By Jamie Williams The California Supreme Court just rejected the government’s attempt to require a
Yesterday, the US Supreme Court in favor of the Trump administration to use $2.5 billion
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump Administration can use $2.5 billion in Pentagon

Hits: 15

90% of Plastic Waste Polluting Earth’s Oceans Comes From Asia and Africa – So Why Are Westerners Being Lectured?

Despite westerners being lectured by climate activists like Greta Thunberg, a study has found that around 90 per cent of plastic waste polluting earth’s oceans comes from Asia and Africa.

During her U.S. tour, Thunberg cited “horrifying pictures of plastic in the oceans,” as one of the primary reasons why Americans should listen to her.

However, researchers at Germany’s Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research discovered that a small number of rivers account for the vast majority of plastic pollution and none of them are located in western countries.

“The 10 top-ranked rivers transport 88-95 percent of the global load into the sea,” Dr. Christian Schmidt, a hydrogeologist who led the study, told the Daily Mail.

“The rivers with the highest estimated plastic loads are characterized by high population – for instance the Yangtze with over half a billion people.”

Out of the top ten rivers that produce the most pollution, eight are in Asia and two are in Africa. The Yangtze River in China and the Ganges River in India were responsible for the most plastic pollution.

While westerners are being told to alter their lifestyles and have fewer children to save the planet, virtually nothing is being said about or to the people in the countries responsible for the vast majority of pollution.

This is probably one of the main reasons why many in the west remain skeptical about the true motives of the environmentalist movement.

As we reported earlier, only 38 per cent of Americans believe global warming is man made.

Reference: Summit.news

Source Article from http://humansarefree.com/2019/09/90-of-plastic-waste-polluting-earths.html

Related Posts
September 7, 2019 By B.N. Frank Experts have already determined that E-Waste is a huge
(Natural News) Swedish researchers talk about the potential of using fungi to convert food
June 11, 2019 By B.N. Frank Activist Post has reported before about how digital, electronic,
  Another whale has washed up on the shores of Italy and just like the last

Hits: 18

Soros-funded ‘Best for Britain’ Group Threatens Queen Over Brexit

The EU loyalist Best for Britain group appeared to invoke the fate of the beheaded King Charles I after Queen Elizabeth II agreed to prorogue (temporarily suspend) Parliament for a few weeks before the Brexit deadline.

Following news that the Queen rubber-stamped Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s request to suspend the parliamentary session — the longest-running for almost 400 years — so that his government can bring forward a new legislative programme on October 14th, the George Soros-funded group tweeted that it would “make no sense for the Queen to back this deeply undemocratic, unconstitutional and fundamentally political manoeuvre from the government,” in comments later attributed to its CEO, Naomi Smith.

“If the Queen is asked to help, she would do well to remember history doesn’t look too kindly on royals who aid and abet the suspension of democracy,” the anti-Brexit group added darkly, appearing to allude to the fate of the monarch’s ancestor Charles I, who tried to govern without Parliament and was in the end publicly beheaded.

Read & share: ‘List of Soros’ Names 226 MEPs in Europe Who Are Under the Complete Control of George Soros

In fact, it is misleading to suggest the Queen’s decision to approve the Prime Minister’s request for a suspension has involved her in politics in a personal way, any more than the Houses of Parliament involve her in politics when they vote for a law and put it in front of her to receive the Royal Assent.

In theory, the Queen could decline the “advice of her ministers” on Government decisions like whether or not to prorogue, as she could in theory refuse to grant her assent to parliamentary bills — but it is understood that she does not do so by constitutional convention, with her final decision on such matters being essentially ceremonial.

Best for Britain’s assertion that prorogation is “unconstitutional” also seems dubious, as it would not have been approved if if there was no legal basis for it — and the great constitutional jurist A V Dicey was clear that “The House [of Commons] can in accordance with the constitution be deprived of power [when] there is fair reason to suppose that the opinion of the House is not the opinion of the electors” in his seminal Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution.

Source: Breitbart.com

Source Article from http://humansarefree.com/2019/09/soros-funded-best-for-britain-group.html

Related Posts
  The British House of Commons has voted in favor of debating a motion to take
youtube twitter facebook rss Source Article from https://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-threatens-use-nuclear-weapons-wipe-out-its-enemies/5687924
Railways minister Sheikh Rasheed Ahmad, who is in charge of his country’s choo-choo trains and
As with most things about US foreign policy today, the irony of this situation is
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has warned of a “strong response” if it is

Hits: 6

Cameras On Nearly 3,000 Street Lights All Over San Diego

In December 2016, when the San Diego City Council approved a $30.3 million project to upgrade 14,000 street lights with sensors — and a portion of them with cameras — law-enforcement applications had not yet been considered.

San Diegans are only just now coming to a wider understanding of how police access and use of video footage captured by the cameras mounted on nearly 3,000 street lights is taking place throughout the city, Erik Caldwell, the director of economic development for the city of San Diego, told The San Diego Union-Tribune on Tuesday.

“When we launched the system we did not intend for law enforcement to get as much use out of it as they are,” Caldwell said.

“And so as that changed and that fact changed we wanted to engage the public in having a conversation about that … to make sure that this unintended use case has the proper policy and oversight in place to ensure privacy and ensure that there’s no nefarious use.”

San Diego Police Department Lt. Jeffrey Jordon confirmed that the department has used video from these cameras to help in 46 investigations since August 11 when the department first requested their use.

Tuesday, Caldwell explained that the cameras mounted on 2,940 street lamps all over the city do not have the capability to engage in facial recognition or license-plate reading as is the case in other places. An additional 250 are currently being installed, he said.

A story published Monday about the smart street light sensors and cameras explains how the devices work. But how exactly can the police department use the data from the sensors and cameras? Where exactly are the camera-equipped street lights located? And how much information do they capture?

Here are the questions we’re answering today:

How exactly can police use video captured by the street light cameras?

The San Diego Police Department has used video footage to assist in at least 46 investigations, Lt. Jordon told the Union-Tribune on Tuesday. The cameras are recording 24 hours a day but access to video footage is highly restricted, according to the department’s policy on the “Intelligent Streetlights” program.

In the course of an investigation of a crime, a police officer may file a written request to access the exact portion of video footage captured. Direct access to video information now includes officers from divisions that investigate homicides, sex crimes, internal affairs, traffic investigations and robberies, Lt. Jordon said.

How police determine what’s an acceptable use for this video footage depends on the severity of the crime, the immediacy of a threat to public safety and what sort of other information is needed in critical incidents.

The “Intelligent Streetlights” are not equipped with Pan-Tilt-Zoom, or PTZ, video magnification, facial recognition technology or automatic license-plate readers, or ALPR, according to the department.

By Luis Gomez, SanDiegoUnionTribune.com (excerept)

Source Article from http://humansarefree.com/2019/09/cameras-on-nearly-3000-street-lights.html

Related Posts
Authored by Economic Prism's MN Gordon, annotated by Acting-Man's Pater Tenebrarum, The Future and the
Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project Waking TimesFox News is no stranger to hating on
Footage shows the a group of armed protesters –many equipped with helmets and gas masks–
Source Article from https://21stcenturywire.com/2019/08/21/proud-boys-vs-antifa-portlands-pantomime-street-theater/
Before his extended stay in New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center began in July, disgraced sex

Hits: 6

Dems Help Cook 10,500 Steaks at Event While Lecturing Americans to Eat Less Meat

Democrat leaders cook 10,000 steaks at event while lecturing ordinary Americans to eat less meat

Even Democrats don’t believe their own virtue-signaling propaganda.

Democratic presidential candidates assembled to Iowa Saturday to take part in the Polk County Democratic Party’s annual steak fry.

Over 10,500 steaks were grilled at the annual event in Des Moines.

Freebeacon.com reports: Democratic candidates recently participated in a CNN climate town hall, where multiple candidates discussed the importance of reducing meat intake. Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) called for the U.S. government to create incentives to eat less meat.

“As a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat and in terms of healthy eating because we have a problem in America,” Harris said. “But there has to be also what we do in terms of creating incentives that we will eat in a healthy way, that we will encourage moderation and that we will be educated about the effect of our eating habits on our environment.”

Andrew Yang said he would “modify Americans’ diets over time” by increasing the price of beef to the point where Americans would buy less meat. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) and Mayor Pete Buttigieg are also in favor of adding a meat tax in order to decrease consumption.

Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.), who is a vegan, said “this planet simply can’t sustain” people eating meat.

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/dems-cook-10500-steaks-while-lecturing-americans-eat-less-meat/

Related Posts
The revelations about the machinations of the so-called “deep state” often conceal deeper truths that
An Israeli military officer on leave was moderately wounded Friday afternoon after being hit in
An Oklahoma sheriff's deputy was arrested with a large knife, gloves, and zip ties while
(Natural News) In the wonderful world of Los Angeles California, liberals are
    New World Order in Meltdown, But Russia Stronger Than Ever by Jon Hellevig

Hits: 11

Russia Might Have Evidence About Prince Andrew’s Abuse of Epstein’s Sex Slave: MI6

Russia might have evidence about Prince Andrew's abuse of Epstein's sex slave, MI6 warn

British intelligence officials are worried Russia has obtained evidence about Prince Andrew’s abuse of Epstein’s teenage “sex slave”.

Incriminating evidence links the Duke’s 2001 encounter with then-17-year-old Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre, MI6 say.

The intelligence agency’s concerns center on the case of John Mark Dougan, a former Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy who now lives in Russia, The Times of London reported.

Nypost.com reports: Dougan, who moved to Moscow and sought asylum there in 2016, had worked for the sheriff’s office in 2005, the year it began an investigation into Epstein. The billionaire pedophile had owned a Palm Beach mansion.

Now, almost 20 years after Andrew’s alleged tryst, a “security source” tells the Times that MI6 is concerned Dougan may still have inside information concerning Epstein and Prince Andrew.

Dougan claimed on Facebook in July he still possessed confidential documents no one had seen, the Times said.

And Dougan is known to have had contact with Pavel Borodin, a senior Russian government official who is sometimes referred to as President Vladimir Putin’s “mentor,” the Times said.

Dougan quit the Palm Beach County sheriff’s office in 2009 after three years on road patrol and became a self-appointed corruption “whistleblower.”

By 2012, he was running loose-cannon websites accusing his former fellow sheriffs of corruption, fascism and even child molestation.

“It didn’t bother me until he said I raped my son,” then-Sheriff Ric Bradshaw complained of Dougan to the Palm Beach Post in 2012.

With an FBI investigation looming, Dougan fled the US in 2016, catching a flight from Toronto to Moscow.

There, he claimed political asylum and billed himself as “BadVolf,” an exiled law-enforcement whistleblower.

In 2017 he was linked to an online story falsely accusing one of his longtime targets, Palm Beach’s then-chief deputy sheriff, of being a white supremacist who wanted to rape and kill “a black man or a Jew.”

Dougan denied involvement with the story to the Palm Beach Post at the time.

His current website says he is appearing on Russian documentaries, working for disability charities and selling self-branded Dougan’s Steaks.

The Post’s attempts to reach Dougan by phone and email were unsuccessful.

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/russia-evidence-prince-andrews-abuse-epsteins-sex-slave-mi6/

Related Posts
Two years ago, I asked, “Will Russia Leave the West?” The world’s largest territorial country—sprawling
The Tsentr-2019 (Center-2019) drill, which kicked off on Monday, amasses around 128,000 troops, with more
It's the second major Russia-North Korea incident on the high seas in as many months:
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran H.E. Hassan Rouhani, President of the Russian Federation
For the U.S., encouraging Iraq to optimise its gas flows so that it reduces

Hits: 8

NBC News Demand Ordinary Americans ‘Confess’ Their Climate Change Sins

NBC News asks American public to confess their climate change sins

NBC News is now demanding that ordinary Americans confess their climate change sins to unburden themselves of their first-world problems.

Yes, really.

The far-left network recently put out a call for “climate confessions”, allowing viewers to “do their part” in “preventing climate change” by confessing their sins to NBC in one of six categories: plastics, meat, energy, transportation, paper and food waste.

Rt.com reports: Previous visitors’ climate “sins” are posted anonymously, in case you need inspiration or can’t remember how you last violated the trust of Mother Nature.

But NBC’s audience doesn’t seem to be falling for it. “I run my AC 24/7. I’m not going to sweat to appease this climate religion,” reads one confession posted on the site. “I think the climate has always been changing, and I’m not going to stop eating meat because of cult-like manipulation by the left,” reads another.

As criticism of the green movement increasingly points out its cultish aspects, NBC’s online confessional is providing some quality ammunition. But it’s not the only element of the green movement that has religious underpinnings. Carbon offsets are little more than a 21st century version of the papal “indulgences” purchased by wealthy sinners to offset their evil deeds and grant them entry into heaven. The trend toward consuming flavorless sludge like Soylent and insect-based foods to save the planet by punishing one’s own tastebuds is reminiscent of those medieval religious devotees who wore hair shirts to mortify their flesh.

With the movement’s Joan of Arc Greta Thunberg in the lead – seriously, mainstream publications are unironically calling her Joan of Arc – children worldwide are mounting what some have termed a crusade, demanding their parents fix the planet lest the world end before they have a chance to grow old.

Those parents – and everyone else in their generation – are socially forbidden to criticize Thunberg because of her age and mental disorder, and NBC’s climate confessional seems to be a peace offering, or a gateway drug: if you can’t beat them, join them. “Confessions” have a limit of 130 characters – you don’t have to tell your life story – just admit it, say you’ve been bad, and say 40 Hail Gretas.

In Sweden and other parts of Europe, Americans are told, people are already avoiding air travel, lest they be accused of hogging more than their fair share of carbon emissions. Millions of little Greta acolytes reportedly take to the streets every Friday, striking for climate – never mind that most children will seize any opportunity to take a day off school, no matter what the cause. And this phenomenon, Americans have been informed, is coming to the US, whether they like it or not.

In New York, Mayor Bill deBlasio has officially excused kids from school next Friday, so long as they participate in the climate strike. Thunberg has already chastised Congress for refusing to take “meaningful action,” as if that was something Congress did on any other issue.

Flygskam” (flying shame) could catch on among the 40-plus percent of Americans who can’t afford to take vacations, but more likely they will continue to save up for an airborne getaway. For those who can afford to fret over the recyclability of their straws, however, a promising new religion has landed on US shores in a racing yacht owned by the royal family of Monaco.

And like the medieval church, the green movement has a major sideline in getting rich. We Don’t Have Time, the tech company that made Thunberg a star, has attracted hundreds of investors by launching a “social network for climate action” that will essentially evaluate businesses based on the quality of their greenwashing PR.

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/nbc-news-ordinary-americans-confess-climate-change-sins/

Related Posts
Three American journalists decided to do what many of their colleagues have done since the
This week Dutch journalist Rico Brouwer sat down with U.S. whistleblower attorney Jesselyn Radack in
(Natural News) In a truly bizarre attempt at making the abortion process
As activist groups around the world prepare to stage a global ‘climate strike’ on Friday,
Martin SIEFF September 14, 2019 The people of Hong Kong enjoy one of the highest standards

Hits: 9

Epstein Paid Doctors to Drug Teen ‘Sex Slaves’ Who Were Trafficked to Elite

Jeffrey Epstein paid doctors to drug his sex slaves who were sometimes trafficked to the elite

Jeffrey Epstein’s victims say the pedophile billionaire paid doctors to drug them up before being raped and trafficked to his VIP friends.

“There were doctors and psychiatrists and gynecologist visits. There were dentists who whitened our teeth. There was a doctor who gave me Xanax. What doctor in their right mind, who is supposed to protect their patients, gives girls and young women Xanax?” said victim Virginia Giuffre, who was one of Epstein’s child sex slaves who was trafficked to Prince Andrew when she was just a teenager.

Giuffre sat down with fellow sex slave victims Sarah Ransome and Marijke Chartouni to discuss their experiences – just a handful of the 60 victims uncovered by the Miami Herald’s Julie Brown

Zerohedge.com reports: Ransome – a South Africa native who successfully sued Epstein and his former partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, finds it hard to believe that high-profile people in Epstein’s orbit had no idea what was going on

“I find it so funny with all these people, after Jeffrey was arrested, saying ‘we didn’t know — we didn’t see anything,” she said. “Jeffrey was always surrounded by girls, always. And these weren’t normal girls. You could see it in our faces. … We were damaged, we were medicated. How can you sit in front of a group of girls with Jeffrey and say ‘we just didn’t know it’? You had to know.”

Following Epstein’s death, federal authorities in New York are now focusing their efforts on Maxwell – Epstein’s alleged ‘madam’ and chief operator of his sex trafficking scheme – along with other potential co-conspirators, including doctors and lawyers who may have helped him.

Besides Maxwell, the other possible accomplices named in court documents are Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross and Jean-Luc Brunel, owner of Mc2 modeling agency, based in Miami. All of them, in court papers, have either denied being involved or have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. –Miami Herald

According to Fort Lauderdale-based attorney Bradley Edwards who represents several of Epstein’s victims, “He would find out they have no home, no car, that they need a place to live, and he would provide a place to live. He can get you to the best doctors. Sometimes he would do that and sometimes he wouldn’t do that, but the promise was real because as soon as you walk into his house and see there are legitimate cooks, chefs, and assistants, everybody catering to him — it gives this air of legitimacy. I mean, everybody in this whole entire mansion can’t possibly be running an illegal sex trafficking operation, right?

Victims of dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein say he paid doctors and psychiatrists to dope them up with anti-anxiety and antidepressant medications, according to a new report in the Miami Herald

“There were doctors and psychiatrists and gynecologist visits. There were dentists who whitened our teeth. There was a doctor who gave me Xanax. What doctor in their right mind, who is supposed to protect their patients, gives girls and young women Xanax?” said victim Virginia Giuffre, who was recruited into Epstein’s world when she was just 16-years-old. 

Giuffre sat down with fellow accusers Sarah Ransome and Marijke Chartouni to discuss their experiences – just three of the 60 victims uncovered by the Miami Herald’s Julie Brown

Ransome – a South Africa native who successfully sued Epstein and his former partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, finds it hard to believe that high-profile people in Epstein’s orbit had no idea what was going on

“I find it so funny with all these people, after Jeffrey was arrested, saying ‘we didn’t know — we didn’t see anything,” she said. “Jeffrey was always surrounded by girls, always. And these weren’t normal girls. You could see it in our faces. … We were damaged, we were medicated. How can you sit in front of a group of girls with Jeffrey and say ‘we just didn’t know it’? You had to know.”

Following Epstein’s death, federal authorities in New York are now focusing their efforts on Maxwell – Epstein’s alleged ‘madam’ and chief operator of his sex trafficking scheme – along with other potential co-conspirators, including doctors and lawyers who may have helped him.

Besides Maxwell, the other possible accomplices named in court documents are Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross and Jean-Luc Brunel, owner of Mc2 modeling agency, based in Miami. All of them, in court papers, have either denied being involved or have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. –Miami Herald

According to Fort Lauderdale-based attorney Bradley Edwards who represents several of Epstein’s victims, “He would find out they have no home, no car, that they need a place to live, and he would provide a place to live. He can get you to the best doctors. Sometimes he would do that and sometimes he wouldn’t do that, but the promise was real because as soon as you walk into his house and see there are legitimate cooks, chefs, and assistants, everybody catering to him — it gives this air of legitimacy. I mean, everybody in this whole entire mansion can’t possibly be running an illegal sex trafficking operation, right?

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/epstein-paid-doctors-drug-teen-sex-slaves-trafficked-elite/

Related Posts
Prince Charles’ favourite uncle, Lord Louis Mountbatten, was close friends with Jimmy Saville. Mountbatten and
Editor’s note: We have confirmed that Jeffrey Epstein owned a modeling agency where he brought
Vic Bishop, Staff Writer Waking TimesSome things in our world are so terrible that no
     A Charlotte County deputy was caught trafficking a controlled substance which predators use to

Hits: 15

Rabbi Predicted 40 Years Ago: Israeli Elections but No Gov’t Signals Arrival of Messiah

Rabbi Yitzchak Kaduri predicted that an Israeli election and no government would signal the coming of a new messiah

Forty years ago Rabbi Yitzchak Kaduri, a Kabbalist from Baghdad, predicted that the Messiah would arrive at a time when elections resulted in no government.

The Israeli elections last week resulted in no coalition being formed. Many mystics and end-of-day experts say the dissolution of the government is a precursor to the resurrection of the Davidic Dynasty.

Breakingisraelnews.com reports: Forty years ago, Rabbi Eliyahu Merav was a young man and looked to Rabbi Kaduri as his spiritual guide. 

“It is very important to understand such things in context,” Rabbi Merav said. “Rabbi Kaduri spoke very little so it was very important to understand precisely what he intended. One day, he was taking questions and someone asked when the Moshiach (Messiah) would arrive and whether there were signs the would precede his arrival. The rabbi answered, ‘When there will be elections but there will not be a government’.”

Rabbi Merav noted that at the time, this statement was very confusing.

“It seemed contradictory,” Rabbi Merav said. “How could there be elections but no government? If there are elections, there will be a government. That is simply the way things work. No one understood him at the time but this is really how it is with prophecy; you don’t understand it until it happens.”

“The primary goal of every politician is to stay in power,” Rabbi Merav noted. “It goes against their nature to want to campaign a second time. What is happening now in Israeli politics is not only unprecedented, it is counter-intuitive.”

“As strange as things are, I realized that it was precisely the situation that Rabbi Kaduri described 40 years ago,” Rabbi Merav said. “There is a mitzvah (Torah commandment) incumbent upon every Jew to anticipate the arrival of the Messiah at every moment. I certainly strive to perform that mitzvah but we are not the kind of people who are always seeking signs for the end of days. There is a lot of work to do without that. Serving Hashem is not easy. If there are signs that the Messiah is imminent then these show us that even more than usual, it is time to focus on doing Hashem’s will.

Rabbi Merav’s anecdote about the holy man’s prediction will take on even more weight should the unprecedented failure to form a coalition government happen a second time.

Rabbi Berger: “Demeaning” Government Must Fall Before Davidic Dynasty Can Appear

Rabbi Yosef Berger, rabbi of the Tomb of King David on Mount Zion and a direct descendant of King David, noted that a failure to establish a new government was prophesied to precede the Messiah.

“The Davidic Dynasty will only be established after the ‘demeaning’ government ends,” Rabbi Berger said to Breaking Israel News, citing the Talmud. “The Davidic Dynasty will not be established as a continuation of a bad government. If a government in Israel does not adhere to the Torah and act as the means to spread the light of Torah out to the nations, it must first fail, end entirely, and then a new ruler will arise who will establish the dynasty.”

“This is a punishment that suits the offense. Any ruler who demeans the Bible will, in the end, be demeaned. This was clearly what happened last week when Netanyahu was forced to leave the stage because Hamas fired rockets at him,” Rabbi Berger said. “The ruler embodies the entire nation and it is forbidden for him to allow himself, or the nation, to be dishonored. What would Trump do if an enemy fired rockets at him? Netanyahu ran from the stage and there was no real response.”

Rabbi Berger noted that this prophecy of the government falling was so clear to the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox ) that many decided not to vote in this week’s election.

Two Gates Must Fall

Rabbi Yekutiel Fish,  an expert in Jewish mysticism who blogs in Hebrew under the title ‘Sod Chashmal,’ told Breaking Israel News that the final redemption is very close indeed and that one clear sign that this is so will be when the second round of elections fail to result in the formation of a government. He based this on a section of the Talmud. 

The disciples of Rabbi Yossi the son of Kisma questioned him, asking when the son of David (the Messiah) will appear. And he answered: I am afraid you will request from me a sign as well. And they assured him that they would not. He then said to them: When this gate will fall, be rebuilt and fall again, be rebuilt again and fall again. And before it will be rebuilt for the third time the Messiah will appear. Tractate Sanhedrin (78a).

Rabbi Fish explained that the term שער (gate) refers to government or leadership, as seen in a  verse in Deuteronomy.

You shall appoint magistrates and officials for your tribes (gates), in all the settlements that Hashem your God is giving you, and they shall govern the people with due justice. Deuteronomy 16:1

In a recent blog, Rabbi Fish cited a commentary that explains the words שער (gate) as an acronym for שִׁלְטוֹן עֵרֶב רב (rule by the mixed multitude). Rabbi Fish explained the ‘gate’ referred to the government of Israel.  

Rabbi Fish also predicted that the second elections will be accompanied by war, a prediction that was also made by Netanyahu on Friday.

80 Years And Now God Steps In

Dov Bar Leib, an end-of-days blogger, noted that if, as most of the pundits predict, no new government emerges, the status quo will stay in place and Netanyahu will remain as prime minister.

“Many prophecies indicate that Netanyahu will be the last leader before the Moshiach arrives,” Bar Leib said, referring to the 12th chapter of the Book of Zechariah. “The one who ushers in Moshiach must be from the House of Natan.”

The family of the House of David by themselves, and their womenfolk by themselves; the family of the House of Natan by themselves, and their womenfolk by themselves; Zechariah 12:12

 Bar Leib explained that the prime minister’s grandfather, Benzion Mileikowsky, changed his family name to Netanyahu after making aliyah from Poland.

The next first indicates that the leader who ushers in Messiah must be a Levite.

The family of the House of Levi by themselves, and their women-folk by themselves; the family of the Shim’ites by themselves, and their womenfolk by themselves; Zechariah 12:13

“No one knew that Netanyahu was a Levite until 2011 when a Likud conference was held in Tzfat (Safed),” Bar Leib explained. “At the afternoon prayers, they asked if there was a Levite for the appropriate portion of the Torah reading and Netanyahu announced that he was a Levite. It is now common knowledge however it is significant that he first made this known in Tzfat, which means ‘to look out over.’ It was so named since it overlooks the upper Galilee which is prophesied to be the first pace the Messiah will be revealed.”

Bar Leib noted that the third characteristic related to “the House of Shimi”.

“Shimi ben Geira came from the tribe of Benyamin, connecting him at least in name to Netanyahu,” Bar Leib said. “He and his descendants were charged with doing a tikkun (fixing) for King Saul’s failure to wipe out all of Amalek. This was partially rectified by Mordecai, a descendant of Shimi and both from the tribe of Benjamin, in Persia.”

“Netanyahu is acting as the House of Shimi by his opposition to Iran, the modern Persian and incarnation of Amalek,” Bar Leib said.

He noted that the elections will be held on a Biblically auspicious date: the 17th day of the Hebrew month of Elul.

“The 17th of Elul is the day on which Noah sent out the Dove the first time from Noach’s Ark,” Bar Leib told Breaking Israel News. “It returned that evening because it could find no rest for its foot.”

Bar Leib noted another event that took place on the 17th of Elul exactly 80 years ago: Hitler’s invasion of Poland. 

“Three million Polish Jews would then be murdered because they had no place to run to, no place to rest their feet,” Bar Leib said, citing Psalms.

The span of our life is seventy years, or, given the strength, eighty years; but the best of them are trouble and sorrow. They pass by speedily, and we are in darkness.Who can know Your furious anger? Your wrath matches the fear of You. Psalms 90:10-11

“God gave us 80 years to bring redemption through natural, even political means,” Bar Leib said. “Now, he is showing us that politics didn’t work and he will take over.”

Bar Leib suggested that two key people in the elections do not come from either of the major parties. One is President Reuven Rivlin who, as president, chooses which party will be tasked with forming the next government. 

“President Rivlin is descended from Rabbi Hillel Rivlin of Shklov, a disciple of the Vilna Gaon in the 18th century, who wrote Kol Hator” Bar Leib noted. Kol Hator is a book describing the Jewish tradition of Messianic era as a two-stage process beginning with Moshiach (Messiah) from the house of Joseph, a practical process that includes building up the land of Israel and the ingathering of the exiles. Moshiach from the house of David is a miraculous process culminating in the completion of the Third Temple and the resurrection of the dead. According to Rabbi Rivlin, the Moshiach for the House of Joseph began in the times of the Vilna Gaon.

According to Bar Leib, the second character in the elections is referred to in Psalms and marks the beginning of the Moshiah from the House of David. He explained that the Hallel (a verbatim recitation from Psalms 113–118 said on certain holidays) is a prelude to redemption. The first two chapters describe the Exodus from Egypt but the last four chapters describe the final redemption. 

“Psalm 115 is the transition from Moshiach ben Yosef to Moshiach ben David,” Bar Leib explained, referencing the penultimate verse.

The dead cannot praise Hashem, nor any who go down into silence. Psalms 115:17

The word for ‘silence’ in this verse is דוּמָה (Duma). 

“When Jewish boys were falsely accused of perpetrating a deadly arson in the Arab village of Duma, the Shin Bet (internal security forces) tortured them, refusing to allow them to even see their parents,” Bar Leib said. “Itamar Ben Gvir of the Otzma Yehudit party descended into the Gehenom (hell) of the prison to force the police to give them their rights. He is the gatekeeper of the depths and will play a key role in the transition from one Moshiach to the next.”

Source Article from https://newspunch.com/rabbi-predicted-israeli-elections-no-govt-arrival-messiah/

Related Posts
The Jerusalem District Court on Sunday sentenced a Spanish journalist to seven years in prison
Since Bill and Hillary Clinton left the White House in 2001, they have turned political
Auto Workers Go On Strike After Years Of Tirelessly Helping General Motors Reach Record-Level Profits
“The worst act of terrorism in the history of our country which claimed almost 3000

Hits: 12

China and Russian Federation: draft resolution on Syria

JPEG - 10 kb

China and Russian Federation: draft resolution

The Security Council,

Recalling all of its previous resolutions, statements of its President and press statements on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,

Reaffirming the full respect for the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Reiterating its grave distress at the continued severity of humanitarian situation in North-West Syria, exacerbated by the indiscriminate attacks on populated areas, the use of improvised explosive devices, abductions, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary executions, forced disappearances, and violence against civilian population, including sexual and gender-based violence, use of civilians as human shields, restrictions of freedom of movement, and forced recruiting,

Expressing its serious concern over the dominance of terrorists in the Idlib de escalation zone, controlling more than 90% of its territory, which causes suffering to civilian population and hampers humanitarian activities in north-west Syria,

Renewing its unwavering commitment to strengthening international cooperation to prevent and combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, and reaffirming that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever, and by whomsoever committed,

Reaffirming that Member States must ensure that any measures taken to combat terrorism comply with all their obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law, refugee law, and international humanitarian law, while reaffirming its resolve to address all aspects of the threat posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da’esh), Al Qaeda and Al-Nusra Front (ANF) and all other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al Qaeda or ISIL, and other terrorist groups, as designated by the Security Council,

Further urging all States to ensure no tolerance for terrorism, regardless of the targets or motives, and calling upon all States to refrain from organizing, instigating, facilitating, participating in, financing, encouraging or tolerating terrorist activities and to take appropriate practical measures to ensure that their respective territories are not used for terrorist installations or training camps or for the preparation or organization of terrorist acts intended to be committed against other States or their citizens,

Recognizing that the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects sustains conflicts, exacerbates violence, contributes to the displacement of civilians, undermines respect for international humanitarian law, impedes the provision of humanitarian assistance to victims of armed conflict and fuels crime and terrorism,

Recalling the legal obligations of all parties under international humanitarian law and international human rights law, as well as all relevant UN Security Council resolutions, especially to cease all attacks directed against civilians, civilian objects and as well as medical personnel, their means of transport and equipment, hospitals and other medical facilities,

Expressing dismay over discrepancies in the coordinates and purposes of the facilities, submitted to the parties for de-confliction,

Welcoming the unilateral ceasefire announced by the Syrian Government on 31 August 2019 and expressing deep concern over ongoing military activities in Idlib Governorate, including those conducted by the state parties, which may lead to further hostilities and deteriorate the humanitarian situation,

Reiterating its deep disturbance at the continued lack of humanitarian access in Idlib Governorate, and recalling in this context its resolution 2449 (2018), emphasizing the importance of upholding the principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence, in the provisions of humanitarian assistance and recalling also the importance of humanitarian aid reaching its intended beneficiaries, and in this regard expressing concern over the lack of monitoring and accountability mechanisms for the transboundary deliveries of humanitarian assistance into north-west Syria,

Stressing the importance of de-escalation and respecting ceasefire agreements, as well as the full implementation of resolutions 2254 (2015), 2268 (2016) and 2401 (2018), as steps towards a comprehensive nationwide ceasefire, and emphasizing the need for all parties to respect their commitments to existing ceasefire agreements, and that humanitarian access must be part of these efforts in accordance with international humanitarian law,

Taking note of the memorandum of understanding agreed between the Russian Federation and Turkey on 17 September 2018, as communicated in Security Council document S/2018/852,

Underscoring that Member States are obligated under Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations to accept and carry out the Council’s decisions,

1. Decides that all parties maintain the cessation of hostilities as of 31 August 2019 to avoid a further deterioration of the already catastrophic humanitarian situation in Idlib Governorate;

2. Reaffirms that the cessation of hostilities shall not apply to military operations against individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with terrorist groups, as designated by the Security Council;

3. Reaffirms its decision in resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists, condemns in the strongest terms all instances of non-compliance with the aforementioned decision, and stresses the importance of full and effective implementation of the relevant resolutions and appropriately addressing the issues related to the lack thereof;

4. Reiterates that any individual, group, undertaking or entity either owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by, or otherwise supporting, any individual, group, undertaking or entity associated with ISIL or Al-Qaida, including on the ISIL (Da’esh) & Al-Qaida Sanctions List, shall be eligible for inclusion in the aforementioned List;

5. Reiterates its demand for all parties to comply with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law, to facilitate safe and unhindered humanitarian access to population in need, and immediately seize all attacks against civilians, civilians objects, medical personnel, humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transport, hospitals and other medical facilities, as well as to demilitarize all civilian objects, hospitals and other medical facilities in accordance with international law and to avoid establishing military positions in populated areas;

6. Requests the Secretary-General, through his good offices and the efforts of his Special Envoy for Syria, as outlined in resolution 2254 (2015), to continue to engage in order to find an immediate, durable and lasting solution to the situation in Idlib Governorate, and calls on all relevant Member States, parties to the conflict, and the international community to support and provide concrete assistance to these efforts;

7. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

Source Article from https://www.voltairenet.org/article207697.html

Related Posts
The Security Council, Recalling its resolutions 2042 (2012), 2043 (2012), 2118 (2013), 2139 (2014), 2165
Welcome to your second country, that was the greeting our Syrian hosts gave us when
Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/09/19/israel-syria-internationallaw-israel-attacks-syria-twice-in-24hrs-its-hypocritically-ignored-while-msm-talks-about-saudi-arabia-sept-19th-2019/
The United States is discussing with Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies about possible responses
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran H.E. Hassan Rouhani, President of the Russian Federation

Hits: 20

Belgium, Germany and Kuwait: draft resolution on Syria

JPEG - 10 kb

The Security Council,

Recalling its resolutions 2042 (2012), 2043 (2012), 2118 (2013), 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014), 2175 (2014), 2191 (2014), 2209 (2015), 2235 (2015), 2249 (2015), 2254 (2015), 2258 (2015), 2268 (2016), 2286 (2016), 2332 (2016), 2336 (2016), 2393 (2017), 2401 (2018) and 2449 (2018), and its Presidential Statements of 3 August 2011 (S/PRST/2011/16), 21 March 2012 (S/PRST/2012/6), 5 April 2012 (S/PRST/2012/10), 2 October 2013 (S/PRST/2013/15), 24 April 2015 (S/PRST/2015/10) and 17 August 2015 (S/PRST/2015/15),

Reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic, and to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

Reiterating its grave distress at the continued severity of the devastating humanitarian situation in Syria, and at the fact that urgent humanitarian assistance is required by 11.7 million people in Syria, of whom 6.2 million are internally displaced,

Reaffirming that there is no military solution to the Syria conflict, expressing outrage at the unacceptable levels of violence escalating in and around Idlib Governorate, in particular at the indiscriminate attacks in densely populated areas, including through an intensified campaign of aerial bombings and the use of barrel bombs, and heavy shelling, and further expressing its alarm about the risk of a further deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the event of continued military escalation in northwest Syria, with an estimated civilian population of three million, including over one million children, whilst noting that almost half of the civilian population of Idlib Governorate are internally displaced persons,

Expressing serious concern at the presence of terrorist groups, as designated by the Security Council, and their activities in Idlib Governorate,

Condemning attacks against civilians, civilian objects and medical facilities, including those on the deconfliction list and UN-supported facilities in the area, further compounding suffering and displacing large numbers of people, and recalling in this regard the legal obligations of all parties under international humanitarian law and international human rights law, as well as all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, especially to cease all attacks against civilians and civilian objects, medical facilities, as well as attacks on schools, and stressing the need to end impunity for violations of international humanitarian law and violations and abuses of human rights, and reaffirming that those who have committed or are otherwise responsible for such violations and abuses in Syria must be brought to justice,

Reaffirming that Member States must ensure that any measures taken to combat terrorism comply with all their obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law, refugee law, and international humanitarian law, while reaffirming its resolve to address all aspects of the threat posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da’esh), Al Qaeda and Al-Nusra Front (ANF) and all other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al Qaeda or ISIL, and other terrorist groups, as designated by the Security Council,

Reiterating its deep concern at the continued lack of humanitarian access in various parts of Syria, and recalling in this context its resolution 2449 which demanded that all parties allow safe, unimpeded, and sustained access for United Nations’ and their implementing partners’ humanitarian convoys, including medical and surgical supplies, to all requested areas and populations according to United Nations’ assessments of need in all parts of Syria, and recalling the obligations for all parties to respect the relevant provisions of international humanitarian law and recalling the United Nations guiding principles of humanitarian emergency assistance, emphasizing the importance of upholding the principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence, in the provision of humanitarian assistance and recalling also the importance of humanitarian deliveries reaching their intended beneficiaries,

Stressing the importance of de-escalation and respecting ceasefire agreements, as well as the full implementation of resolutions 2254 (2015), 2268 (2016) and 2401 (2018), as steps towards a comprehensive nation-wide ceasefire, and emphasizing the need for all parties to respect their commitments to existing ceasefire agreements, and that the provision of humanitarian assistance is essential for the survival of the civilian population must be part of these efforts in accordance with international humanitarian law,

Taking note of the memorandum of understanding agreed between the Russian Federation and Turkey on 17 September 2018, as communicated in Security Council document S/2018/852;

Expressing outrage at the insufficient implementation of its resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014), 2191 (2014), 2254 (2015), 2258 (2015), 2268 (2016), 2332 (2016), 2393 (2017), 2401 (2018), and 2449 (2018), and recalling that resolution 2401 demands that all parties cease hostilities without delay,

Determining that the devastating humanitarian situation in Syria continues to constitute a threat to peace and security in the region,

Underscoring that Member States are obligated under Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations to accept and carry out the Council’s decisions,

1. Decides that all parties shall immediately cease hostilities to avoid a further deterioration of the already catastrophic humanitarian situation in Idlib Governorate, beginning at noon Damascus time on 21 September 2019;

2. Demands that Member States ensure that all measures taken to counter terrorism, including in Idlib Governorate, comply with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and international refugee law, and stresses that counterterrorism operations do not absolve parties to armed conflicts of their obligations under international humanitarian law, including their obligation to distinguish between civilian populations and combatants, and urges all parties to apply the principles of distinction, proportionality, and the obligation to take all feasible precautions to avoid and in any event minimize harm to civilians and civilians objects, and requests the Secretary-General to provide reports of any violations of international humanitarian law to the Security Council immediately;

3. Reiterates its demand, reminding in particular the Syrian authorities, that all parties immediately comply with their obligations under international law, including international human rights law, as applicable, and international humanitarian law, in particular the respect for protection of civilians, including the immediate halting of any indiscriminate aerial bombardments resulting in civilian casualties, as well as taking all feasible precautions to avoid, and in any event minimize, harm to civilians, including children, and civilian objects, as well as the respect for and protection of all medical personnel and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transport and equipment, as well as hospitals and other medical facilities;

4. Demands the full and immediate implementation of all provisions of all relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014), 2254 (2015), 2258 (2015), 2332 (2016), 2393 (2017), 2401 (2018), 2449 (2018), and recalls that some of the violations and abuses committed in Syria may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, and stresses that those who have committed violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law must be held accountable;

5. Calls upon all parties to respect and fulfil their commitments to existing ceasefire agreements, including the full implementation of resolutions 2254 (2015), 2268 (2016) and 2401 (2018), and furthermore calls upon all Member States to use their influence with parties to ensure the implementation of a cessation of hostilities, the fulfilment of existing commitments and to support efforts to create the conditions for a durable and lasting nation-wide ceasefire and stresses the need for relevant guarantees from those Member States, including through the implementation of the memorandum of understanding agreed between the Russian Federation and Turkey on 17 September 2018;

6. Emphasizing the need for a ceasefire monitoring, verification and reporting mechanism, requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on options for such a mechanism that it can support, as soon as possible and no later than one month after the adoption of this resolution, and encourages Member States, including members of the Security Council, to provide assistance, including through expertise and in-kind contributions, to support such a mechanism;

7. Requests the Secretary-General, through his good offices and the efforts of his Special Envoy for Syria, as outlined in resolution 2254 (2015), to continue to engage in order to find, without delay, a durable and lasting solution to the situation in Idlib Governorate, and calls on all relevant Member States, parties to the conflict, and the international community to support and provide concrete assistance to these efforts;

8. Reiterates its demand that all parties allow and facilitate, safe, unimpeded and sustained humanitarian access for the United Nations and its implementing partners to requested areas and populations in Syria in order to ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches people through the most direct route in order to meet basic needs, consistent with the provisions of its resolution 2449 (2018);

9. Demands that all parties facilitate safe and unimpeded passage for medical personnel and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their equipment, transport and supplies, including surgical items, to all people in need, consistent with international humanitarian law and reiterates its demand that all parties demilitarize medical facilities, schools and other civilian facilities and cease to establish military positions in populated areas and desist from attacks directed against civilian objects;

10. Calls upon all parties, in particular the Syrian authorities, to undertake confidence-building measures, including through the immediate release of any arbitrarily detained persons, particularly women, children, and the elderly, as well as the provision of information on missing persons and handover of the bodies of the deceased to families, as outlined in resolution 2474 (2019);

11. Reiterates that there will be no significant and sustainable improvement of the humanitarian situation in the absence of a political solution to the Syrian conflict in line with resolution 2254 (2015) and the Geneva Communique of 30 June 2012, to facilitate a Syrian-led and Syrian-owned political transition, in order to end the conflict in Syria, and further reiterates its support for the efforts of the Special Envoy, and stressing again that the Syrian people will decide the future of Syria;

12. Reaffirms that it will take further measures under the Charter of the United Nations in the event of non-compliance with this resolution;

13. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on the implementation of this resolution, and on compliance by all relevant parties in Syria, within 15 days of the adoption of this resolution and thereafter within the framework of its reporting on resolutions 2139 (2014), 2165 (2014), 2191 (2014), 2258 (2015), 2332 (2016), 2393 (2017), 2401 (2018), and 2449 (2018);

14. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

Source Article from https://www.voltairenet.org/article207698.html

Related Posts
China and Russian Federation: draft resolution The Security Council, Recalling all of its previous resolutions,
Welcome to your second country, that was the greeting our Syrian hosts gave us when
Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/09/19/israel-syria-internationallaw-israel-attacks-syria-twice-in-24hrs-its-hypocritically-ignored-while-msm-talks-about-saudi-arabia-sept-19th-2019/
The United States is discussing with Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies about possible responses
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran H.E. Hassan Rouhani, President of the Russian Federation

Hits: 11

Donald Trump’s Challenge To His Administration, by Thierry Meyssan

JPEG - 29.6 kb
Donald Trump and John Bolton

Several things are clear about the possible change of doctrine of the United States that I announced two weeks ago [1]. For the past three years, President Trump has been trying to impose his point of view on an administration whose senior civil servants have been riveted for 18 years on the Rumsfeld / Cebrowski doctrine of destroying state structures in entire regions of the non-globalized world. On the contrary, for Donald Trump, it is appropriate, from a Jacksonian perspective, to substitute negotiation and business for war, so as to dominate the world in good agreement with Russia and China and no longer against them. He hopes to achieve his goals for September 23, the date of his speech at the UN, one year before the US presidential election. He could thus justify running for a second term by asserting his balance sheet.

The new elements that complement what I said about Syria and Venezuela are Afghanistan, Iran and Yemen. But the most obvious of course is the resignation of National Security Advisor John Bolton. He was not asked to resign, but thanked for his kind and loyal service.

- John Bolton is absolutely not a neo-conservative as some media have written, but a staunch supporter of “American exceptionalism” [2]. This school of thought is based on the myth of the “Pilgrim Fathers”. It refuses to apply international treaties in domestic law; judges the behavior of others with severity, but on principle absolves Americans who act in the same way; and refuses any international jurisdiction in its internal affairs. In a word, it believes that, for religious reasons, the United States is not comparable to other states and must not submit to any international law.

This colorful character does not hesitate to say what suits him, without worrying about proofs or verisimilitude. Thus, in the Syrian Accountability Act vote in 2003, he argued in Congress that Syria – like Iraq – was threatening world peace with weapons of mass destruction. More recently, he made history by banning the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal from coming to investigate in the United States.

John Bolton, who is very popular with ultra-right voters, does not share President Trump’s ideas on international politics. The only National Security adviser who was in harmony with him was General Michael Flynn, who was forced to resign after only three weeks. Bolton succeeded him after General H. R. McMaster. As in the US soap operas, he played with Donald Trump the role of “bad cop”, allowing the president to appear much more conciliatory.

- The second element is the evolution of the Afghan and Yemeni conflicts. It was known that the United States had begun negotiations with the Taliban at the end of the Obama mandate in 2015 in Qatar. What is less known is that since March 2019, President Trump has negotiated Afghanistan’s future, not only with the country’s authorities and insurgents, but also with Russia and China. This time it was not a question of sharing power between the two factions, but of recognizing the legitimacy of the Taliban resistance to foreign presences on their soil in exchange for its condemnation of jihadism. Two meetings were held in Moscow and Beijing [3]. Another was secretly scheduled to be held last week at Camp David, in the presence of Presidents Donald Trump and Ashraf Ghani. Alas! On September 5, the Taliban, wishing to negotiate through force, claimed an attack in Kabul, killing twelve people, including a US citizen. Immediately the Camp David meeting was canceled and the US Army bombed Taliban areas.

At the same time, it was reported that Washington had begun secret negotiations with Yemeni Houthis who are challenging the power of the internationally recognized president, Abdrabbo Mansour Hadi. A few weeks ago, Washington presented them as Iranian agents. The United States suddenly remembered that the Houthis were not supported by Iran at the beginning of the conflict and that they joined forces with Tehran only for the sake of survival. Therefore, it is obvious that in view of the Saudo-Emirati disagreements, Washington’s interest is no longer to support a puppet whom no one obeys and who has long ago taken refuge in Saudi Arabia.

During these negotiations, the war continues without the United States. The Houthis sent a dozen drones to burn Aramco factories. Riyadh claimed to have suffered considerable damage, halving its domestic production. Mike Pompeo has denounced the hand of Tehran who is attacking the global supply of oil. All of this is disproportionate, to say the least. These statements must be interpreted in the context of our third point: the relations between the United States and Iran.

- Recall the data: in 2012, the Obama administration secretly negotiated in Oman with emissaries of the Guide of the Revolution sidelining the team of the nationalist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the election of a merchant in arms of the Iran-Contras affair, Sheikh Hassan Rohani. Once elected, an international agreement, JCPoA, was negotiated in Switzerland. It denounced the impossibility of reactivating the military nuclear program that the Revolutionary Guards had abandoned in 1988, considering weapons of mass destruction as incompatible with their vision of Islam. While a second agreement, bilateral and secret this time, planned to supply Europe with Iranian gas to replace Russian gas. When he arrived at the White House, Donald Trump meant for the United States to control the world energy market, but not at the expense of Russia or China with whom he hoped to dominate the world. He therefore withdrew from the two agreements with Iran and immediately proposed to resume the discussion. Realizing that he had everything to lose in exchange, Sheikh Hassan Rohani demanded respect for the word given, refused the outstretched hand, and-considering an impeachment imminent – declared to wait for the return of the Democrats to the White House. The Guide of the Revolution, meanwhile, reacted in religious and not in politic. Outraged by US disloyalty, which he condemned morally, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei instructed his personal army, the Guardians of the Revolution, to extend his authority over all foreign Shia communities. Overnight, the Guardians stopped defending Iranian national interests for Shiite religious interests; a turnaround that was particularly visible in Syria and becomes so in Lebanon. Last week, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, delivering a speech on Achourra Day, introducing his organization no longer as the Lebanese Resistance to Imperialism, but as loyal to Ayatollah Khamenei. . This is obviously not a 180-degree turn, but rather a support for the Guide to the Revolution on the eve of negotiations.

It seems that all this agitation could stop: the two parties are showing their muscles while preparing to talk to each other again. So far, Russia has had good relations with Iran while knowing of the Persian hope of replacing Russian gas in Europe. Simultaneously, it did not intervene when Israel was crossing the Syrian skies – which it controls – to bombard Iranian targets. Moscow could stop playing with carrot and stick. It could guarantee the sincerity of a US-Iran-Iran agreement (or rather its sustainability), if it were not against Moscow anymore. In this case, it would protect the Iranian bases in the Middle East. It is, it seems, what Vladimir Putin has just announced to Benjamin Netanyahu.

All these advances support the role of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. He appears as the true architect of Donald Trump’s foreign policy. He was the first CIA director of the new president. He now has the privilege of being invited every day to his briefing with the Agency, so that he combines information from the CIA and the State Department. Above all, he is the designer of the president’s energy strategy [4]. Some of the Republican leaders do not believe that Donald Trump will succeed in imposing anything on the military, and certainly not the doctrine – according to them outdated – of President Andrew Jackson. They advised Pompeo not to go down with his boss, but to resign and to run for The Senate in Kansas.

Source Article from https://www.voltairenet.org/article207628.html

Related Posts
Authored by Tom Luongo, Rep. and Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) brought the hammer and
CNN | Nicole Gaouette: President Donald Trump and his senior officials head to the United
Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/09/21/trump-ukraine-joebiden-latest-trump-witch-hunt-involving-ukraine-boomerangs-towards-joe-biden-9-21-2019/
The latest 'smoking gun' Democrats have been clinging to in search of that ever-elusive Trump impeachment
Hillary Clinton blasted President Trump on Friday for seeking the assistance of a foreign government

Hits: 9

Iran Zarif reminds dark days of war against Iran

IRNA – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in a message referred to the start of Iran-Iraq imposed war (1980-1988) by Saddam Hussein supported by global powers.

“9/22/1980 is a dark day for Iranians as it marks Saddam’s invasion – with support of global powers,” Zarif tweeted on Sunday.

He added: “Our region has been in turmoil ever since.”

“We want to make 9/22 a day of peace- not war,” Zarif said referring to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s speech on the occasion of the Sacred Defense Day in Tehran, saying: “Today @HassanRouhani launched Coalition for HOPE: Hormuz Peace Endeavour. Details at UNGA”

Rouhani said that Iran will raise the initiative of Peace at the UN General Assembly with the slogan of Coalition for Hope and Hormuz Peace in the region in protest to attempt to attribute regional events to Iran.

Iran will announce to the world that foreign forces’ presence is trouble-making and dangerous for the region, international waterways, security of the shipping, oil, and energy.

Iran’s path is to create unity and coordination among regional countries, Rouhani said, adding that those who want to attribute regional incidents to Iran are repeating their lies.

Zarif is also in New York and will accompany President Rouhani during his upcoming tour.

The UN announced in a statement that leaders of the countries will take part in a series of sessions with the aim of beefing up efforts in the fields of climate change, sustainable growth, health and global peace in addition to the General Assembly.

The United Nations General Assembly is one of the six principal organs of the UN, the only one in which all member nations have equal representation, and the main deliberative, policy-making, and representative organ of the UN.

Source Article from https://theiranproject.com/blog/2019/09/22/iran-zarif-reminds-dark-days-of-war-against-iran/

Related Posts
IRNA – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said US wants to make negotiations with
“Arab blood vs. Arab oil / A primer on U.S. policy,” Mohammad Javad Zarif wrote
Tasnim – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif left Tehran to attend the 73rd session
AlJazeera – The United States has issued visas allowing Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad
Sputnik – The US has accused Iran of conducting an attack on Saudi Aramco oil

Hits: 9

Rouhani congratulates Iranians on Asian Volleyball Championship title

Tasnim – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani offered his congratulations to the country’s people over the national volleyball team’s winning the title in 2019 Asian Men’s Volleyball Championship.

“The powerful championship of our country’s national volleyball team in the Asian Men’s Volleyball Championship for the third time brought a wave of pride and cheerfulness to our dear people and added another golden page to their athletic glories,” Rouhani said in a message on Saturday night.

“I would like to congratulate the great Iranian nation over this valuable victory, which has added to hopes for qualifying for the upcoming Tokyo Olympic Games (2020),” he said.

“I would also like to appreciate the coaching staff and hard-working athletes, and everyone involved for their efforts,” the president added.

Iran swept aside Australia 3-0 (25-14, 25-17, 25-21) in the 2019 Asian Men’s Volleyball Championship final on Saturday.

In the match, held at the 12,000-seater Azadi Sports Complex in Tehran, Igor Kolakovic’s men showed their reign in Asia for the third time.

It was sweet revenge for Team Melli who had lost to Australia 3-1 in the preliminary round.

Japan defeated South Korea 3-1 (25-23,25-17, 23-25, 25-22) in the bronze medal match.

Source Article from https://theiranproject.com/blog/2019/09/22/rouhani-congratulates-iranians-on-asian-volleyball-championship-title/

Related Posts
The United States treatment of the Iranian volleyball team at the airport in Chicago
IRNA – Iran’s First Vice President in a message expressed his congratulations on the occasion
No matter how you feel about immigration, Mexico is not going anywhere and either is
Tehran, July 19, IRNA – The US Congress by adopting anti-Iranian measures, is trying to
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says the Caspian Sea’s legal regime should guarantee that

Hits: 6

Trump heads to the UN focused on Iran and his political base

CNN | : President Donald Trump and his senior officials head to the United Nations’ annual gathering of world leaders this week focused on a narrow agenda that reflects domestic political concerns, the foreign policy challenge posed by Iran and — by design or default — a continued disconnect with many traditional US allies on the issue of climate change.

When world leaders gather Monday to focus on the UN Climate Action Summit, the US is sending a lower level State Department official who will not speak, leaving the US silent on an issue that UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres has called “a direct existential threat” to the world.

Instead, the President will lead an event on religious freedom, an issue that plays to evangelicals who make up part of the political base he is relying on to win re-election. Trump and his Japanese counterpart are also expected to announce an agreement on trade. The President leveraged voters’ economic anxiety during his campaign, regularly rails against “unfair” trade arrangements and touts the benefits of bilateral pacts that give the US the upper hand.

The furor over reports Trump pressed Ukraine’s president to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son during a call earlier this summer is also likely to overshadow the President’s week, especially on Wednesday when he is due to meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky.

‘An attack on everyone’

And while Trump and his administration have been openly skeptical of the value of international organizations and the UN in particular, this year they will be focused on lobbying the world community to join their push to bring Iran under control — an effort that could be an uphill battle, some analysts say.

The United Nations General Assembly is taking place in the wake of an attack on Saudi oil facilities that Yemen-based Houthi rebels, locked in an ongoing war with Saudi Arabia and its allies for control of the country, say they carried out. Iran has denied responsibility, but the Trump administration insists that is where the blame belongs.

Over the next few days, the Trump administration will stress that point to the audience gathered in New York and emphasize that the victim wasn’t just Saudi Arabia, but the international community. The strikes, attributed to a flotilla of drones and missiles, hit the world’s largest oil processing plant and an oil field and sent global oil prices soaring.
“It’s important to remember the attack on the Saudi facility is an attack on everyone,” a White House official said in a call with reporters on the administration’s plans for the UN.

‘I always like a coalition’

Skeptical allies

‘We all pray’

Source Article from https://theiranproject.com/blog/2019/09/22/trump-heads-to-the-un-focused-on-iran-and-his-political-base/

Related Posts
Authored by Tom Luongo, Rep. and Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) brought the hammer and
Donald Trump and John Bolton Several things are clear about the possible change of doctrine
Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/09/21/trump-ukraine-joebiden-latest-trump-witch-hunt-involving-ukraine-boomerangs-towards-joe-biden-9-21-2019/
The latest 'smoking gun' Democrats have been clinging to in search of that ever-elusive Trump impeachment
Hillary Clinton blasted President Trump on Friday for seeking the assistance of a foreign government

Hits: 7

Zarif: US making negotiations impossible by imposing sanctions

IRNA – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said US wants to make negotiations with Tehran impossible by imposing sanctions.

“The U.S. is running out of options,” Zarif was quoted by Chinese media ‘CGTN’ as saying.

“The maximum sanctions do not work,” he noted.

“It makes it more difficult to remove the sanctions. They want to make the negotiations impossible… want to make a change impossible. It’s very difficult for (President Trump) and his successor to remove,” he added.

Earlier speaking to reporters in New York, Zarif said it is crystal clear that Americans had left the negotiation table.

Stressing the fact that conditions for returning to the negotiation table are clear, he said the negotiation table belongs to those members of the JCPOA who honor their commitments.

The US cannot continue with “Economic Terrorism” or what President Trump says the economic war against Iran and at the same time request for sitting at the negotiation table, Zarif noted.

Reacting to the US recent choice to sanction Central Bank of Iran (CBI) and Sovereign Fund for Development of Iran, he said it indicates the US desperation.

Americans imposed all sanctions that they could do against Iran, Zarif said, adding that they sanctioned the CBI which had earlier been blacklisted now under a new topic.

Describing the US act as dangerous and unacceptable, the Iranian top diplomat said their act is an indication of trying to block international purchases and the supply of food and medicine to the Iranian people.

It is not only the violation of the JCPOA commitments, but also all international principles requiring immunity of the central banks of the sovereign states, Zarif reiterated.

Source Article from https://theiranproject.com/blog/2019/09/22/zarif-us-making-negotiations-impossible-by-imposing-sanctions/

Related Posts
IRNA – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in a message referred to the start
“Arab blood vs. Arab oil / A primer on U.S. policy,” Mohammad Javad Zarif wrote
Tasnim – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif left Tehran to attend the 73rd session
AlJazeera – The United States has issued visas allowing Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad
Sputnik – The US has accused Iran of conducting an attack on Saudi Aramco oil

Hits: 6

Esmaeili reveals details of Rouhani’s visit to NY

MNA – Parviz Esmaeili, deputy presidential chief of staff for communications, disclosed details of the visit of the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani to New York.

Rouhani will leave Tehran for New York on Monday to attend the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations.

As Esmaeili said, in addition to delivering a speech at the high-level UNGA meeting, Rouhani will also hold talks with high ranking media officials as well as media experts. He will conduct interviews with international news agencies and will hold a presser.

Rouhani will also meet top officials from different participating countries besides the Secretary-General of UN and some presidents and heads of international bodies during his stay in New York, he added.

He will leave New York for Tehran on Thursday evening, Esmaeili informed.

Rouhani said Sunday in Tehran while addressing the military parades on the occasion of the start of the Sacred Defense Week that “this year, we are going to New York with the slogan of ‘Coalition of Hope’ and ‘Hormuz Peace Initiative’. This year, we are going to propose an initiative in the United Nations that is based on the fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran can ensure the security of the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman with the help of regional countries.”

He added, “We announce to the world that the presence of foreign forces undermines security of navigation and oil and energy, but the path that the Islamic Republic of Iran has taken is based on unity, solidarity and coordination with regional countries”.

Source Article from https://theiranproject.com/blog/2019/09/22/esmaeili-reveals-details-of-rouhanis-visit-to-ny/

Related Posts
Rouhani’s visit will be at the official invitation of his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Esmaili
On October 30, 1946, members of the Jewish underground in Palestine blew up the waiting
KYIV, Ukraine — A 70-year-old Ukrainian Jewish man on Tuesday met with Prime Minister Benjamin
Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib changed her mind Friday on visiting the West Bank, hours after
US Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib has rejected Israel’s offer to allow her to visit her

Hits: 6

Dr. Gary Null: Communications Decency Act Immunity Letter

letter

  

Dear Senator:

It is time for Congress to take action and remove immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”). The immunity has allowed the big tech companies – the companies that control the information received by the American public – to shield themselves from liability while they abuse their power to censor viewpoints they disagree with. The immunity has left big tech companies no motivation to follow their policies or have a neutral point of view, no motivation to protect the First Amendment right to free speech, no motivation to protect a person’s right not to be defamed. Congress has a responsibility to the American public to remove an immunity that hinders rather than protects their First Amendment right to free speech, to protect them from defamation. And for decades Congress has neglected that responsibility.

I. History

The CDA was passed in 1996 to address problems surrounding the regulation of obscene speech on the internet, primarily minors’ access to pornography. Surely it was not Congress’s intention to shield “internet computer servicers” from liability and interpreting the law as if it was has yielded devastating consequences.

In an article published in Berkeley Technology Law Journal in 2002, Paul Ehrlich discusses the legislative record.[1] He notes that the plain text of the immunity provision does not “expressly preclude distributor liability” and that the law was a response to confusion among the courts. (409)

Ehrlich also discusses the impact that immunity will have on defamation law, writing, “While immunity is a good solution to the problem of obscenity generally, the problem of defamation can only be solved either through a return to distributor liability (costly to free speech) or, more preferably, the weakening of anonymity for defamatory posters.” (408)

That was 2002. And the same issues that Ehrlich addressed then, are present today, 2019, seventeen (17) years later, and have magnified, and will continue to magnify if Congress does not take action.

II. Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act

Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) recently introduced a bill that would remove automatic immunity for big tech companies with respect to political viewpoints. Senator Hawley recognized that “There’s a growing list of evidence that shows big tech companies making editorial decisions to censor viewpoints they disagree with. Even worse, the entire process is shrouded in secrecy because these companies refuse to make their protocols public.”[2]

Hawley’s bill would require big tech companies to prove “by clear and convincing evidence that their algorithms and content-removal practices are politically neutral.” Requiring big tech companies to prove “their algorithms and content-removal practices are politically neutral” hardly seems unreasonable in exchange for an immunity that they have enjoyed for decades, an immunity that is not offered to other media organizations, an immunity that stifles public debate. And as Justice William Brennan wrote in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan in 1964, the First Amendment provides that “debate on public issues … [should be] … uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.”[3]

In the wake of Josh Hawley’s bill, lobbying on behalf of big tech companies is only increasing. According to NBC, “the fervor over Hawley’s bill has revealed just how well powerful companies have laid the foundation in Washington to fight efforts to rein them in.”[4] The same article discusses the “think tanks and other Washington influencers, who help shape discussion about policies that affect those companies.” It is time Congress stop allowing big tech companies shape that discussion about policies because those policies do not only affect those companies, they affect the American public, an American public that is forgotten in the process.

III. Big Tech Companies, Wikipedia

In U.S. Code Section 230(a)(5), Congress found that “Increasingly Americans are relying on interactive media for a variety of political, educational, cultural, and entertainment services.” While immunity should be withdrawn for all big tech companies, Google, Facebook, etc. so that they are no longer to abuse their power to censor viewpoints they disagree with, Wikipedia, and big tech companies that recommend it, may be among the most dangerous.

Today, Wikipedia, is the fifth most popular site in the world. A search in Google, the most popular site in the world, will often return Wikipedia as one of the top results for a search conducted in its engine. And the American public relies on Wikipedia for facts. Why shouldn’t they? It is, after all, an encyclopedia. Even Wikipedia’s own entry for “Wikipedia” refers to itself as such.[5] And the website’s entry for “Encyclopedia” states that “encyclopedia articles focus on factual information concerning the subject named in the article’s title.”[6]

If you don’t want to take Wikipedia’s word for it (totally reasonable under the circumstances), the court in Pitale v. Holstine writes, “Wikipedia is an open-source encyclopedia, primarily serving (or at least intending to serve) as a source of factual information rather than as a forum for expressing opinion. Wikipedia strives to be a repository of facts, not opinions.”[7] In a footnote, the court acknowledges Wikipedia’s “neutral point of view” as one of its “three core content policies.”

But is Wikipedia following its stated policies? Does it have a neutral point of view? Do any of the big tech companies? Josh Hawley is aware of evidence that big tech companies “censor viewpoints they disagree with.” And where such censorship exists, there can be no neutrality.

IV. Immunity and Motivation

Shielded by immunity, big tech companies have no motivation to follow their policies or have a neutral point of view. In the case of Wikipedia, editors are free to remove good faith corrections by other users and then “protect” a page so only a handful of editors are able to make edits. The editors may not even be experts on the subjects of the pages they are editing. They have free rein to target individuals, professions, with whom/which, they disagree. They are able to choose sources that are not objective, take quotes from objective sources out of context, use only negative quotes from objective sources, mis-characterize sources to the point that the information leaves a false impression on a massive audience–a massive audience that is relying on the website for factual information. And so on, and so on, and so on, forever… Such editorial decisions render the big tech companies active, not passive, in their role.

Shielded by immunity, big tech companies have no motivation to give an individual harmed by such biased editorial decisions the opportunity to make a correction. They have no motivation to reveal the identities of their anonymous editors. They have no motivation to consider the American public, their right to free speech, their right not to be defamed. These companies are corporations, so are not held to First Amendment standards, and when editorial decisions render the information biased, these companies are hindering, rather than furthering speech.

Shielded by immunity, big tech companies are denying the American public the opportunity to make informed decisions about a subject. Imagine a person exercising his or her right to vote after relying on biased biographies of candidates that hold themselves out to be factual. Imagine a person making a medical decision after relying on an entry that mentions one peer-reviewed point of view, but not a peer-reviewed point of view that contradicts it because the editors, qualified or unqualified, disagreed with the latter study.

If the big tech companies could be sued, perhaps they would find the motivation to consider the rights of the American public. Perhaps they would follow their policies and have a neutral point of view, perhaps they would protect the First Amendment right to free speech, a person’s right not to be defamed.

V. Immunity v. Defamation

Many individuals who have ideas that do not align with the views of a particular big tech company community are suffering irreparable harm to their reputations and financially as a result of this immunity. They are being defamed with no avenue to repair their reputations and recover their losses. The “internet computer services” can hide behind the automatic immunity, anonymous editors, and a lack of transparency as to their role in the publication and republication of the information.

And while there are obstacles to defamation claims such as a statute of limitations and what constitutes republication, there is no such limitation to the amount of time libelous material will spread through big tech companies to their worldwide audience. The harm goes on indefinitely. In essence, the law as interpreted sentences individuals to an electronic gulag in perpituity.

In addition to removing immunity under Section 230 of the CDA, Congress might reconsider insufficient long-arm statutes and statutes of limitations for defamation claims when statements published and republished on the internet are involved.

VI. Conclusion

Perhaps Congress did not understand the issue in 1996, or read Ehrlich’s article in 2002, but in 2019 there is no excuse for elected representatives to be unfamiliar with this issue. With the introduction of his bill, Hawley has informed you. With this letter, we have informed you. It is time for Congress to acknowledge the injustice that has occurred and continues to occur and take action to remove immunity under Section 230. The American public does not want “think tanks and other Washington influencers” shaping policy. They want their elected representatives shaping policy. They want Congress to finally do what it should have done years ago – remove an immunity that does not protect their First Amendment right to free speech, their right not to be defamed. It is time. Who will Congress protect – the big tech companies or the American public?

References

[1] scholarship.law.berkeley.edu

[2] hawley.senate.gov

[3] New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)

[4] nbcnews.com

[5] Wikipedia

[6] Encyclopedia

[7] Pitale v. Holstine, No. 11 C 00921-Document 37 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

About the author

Gary Null is an internationally recognized thought leader and activist who holds a Ph.D. in human nutrition and public health science and Richard Gall is the Executive Producer for the Progressive Radio Network.

Source Article from https://www.sott.net/article/420806-Dr-Gary-Null-Communications-Decency-Act-Immunity-Letter

Related Posts
With no end to the Brexit impasse in sight, European governments are growing increasingly anxious
Dear Colleague, I hope that you had an enjoyable and productive summer recess, with the
The Facts:Darwin's Theory of Evolution has, for a great many scientists, become relatively obsolete in
  President Donald Trump has said that North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un wants to meet again
More than 100 legal professionals sign letter   The American Bar Association is voting on a

Hits: 7

Robert F. Kennedy Jr: The government is covering up vaccine deaths

Vaccines

  

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is continuing his personal crusade against Big Pharma and Big Government collusion, authoring a hard-hitting article explaining that the government are withholding information from the public about vaccines – and covering up vaccine deaths – in order to protect pharmaceutical companies.

RFK Jr. writes:

Vaccine scientists and the public health community cautiously and occasionally will admit that vaccines can cause adverse reactions just like “any other medication or biological product.” Although experts are less willing to openly disclose the fact that adverse reactions can and do include death, one has only to look at reports to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to see that mortality is a possible outcome.

From 1990 through 2010, for example, VAERS received 1,881 reports of infant deaths following vaccination, representing 4.8% of the adverse events reported for infants over the 20-year period.

Moreover, analysts acknowledge that VAERS, as a passive surveillance system, is subject to substantial underreporting. A federal government report from 2010 affirms that VAERS captures only about 1% of vaccine adverse reports.

On the international frontier, the public health community — with the World Health Organization (WHO) in the vanguard — previously used a six-category framework to investigate and categorize serious adverse events following immunization (AEFI), including death.

Guided by this tool, public health teams examined temporal criteria and possible alternative explanations to determine whether the relationship of an AEFI to vaccine administration was “very likely/certain,” “probable,” “possible,” “unlikely,” “unrelated,” or “unclassifiable.”

In 2013, the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety discarded the prior tool, ostensibly because users “sometimes [found it] difficult to differentiate between ‘probable,’ ‘possible,’ and ‘unlikely’ categories.” The WHO enlisted vaccine experts to develop a “simpler” algorithm that would be more readily “applicable” to vaccines. The resulting four-category system now invites public health teams to classify an AEFI as either “consistent,” “inconsistent,” or “indeterminate” with a vaccine-related causal association or as “unclassifiable.”

Despite the patina of logic suggested by the use of an algorithm, “the final outcome of the case investigation depends on the personal judgment of the assessor” [emphasis added], especially (according to the tool’s proponents) when the process “yields answers that are both consistent and inconsistent with a causal association to immunization.”

In a 2017 letter in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, Drs. Jacob Puliyel (an India-based pediatrician and member of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization) and Anant Phadke (an executive member of the All India Drug Action Network) raise important questions about the revised tool.

They describe an Orwellian Catch-22 situation wherein it is nearly impossible to categorize post-vaccine deaths as vaccine-related. This is because the revised algorithm does not allow users to classify an AEFI as “consistent with causal association with vaccine” unless there is evidence showing that the vaccine caused a statistically significant increase in deaths during Phase III clinical trials.

By definition, however, any vaccine not found to “retain safety” in Phase III trials cannot proceed to Phase IV (licensure and post-marketing surveillance). The result of the algorithm’s convoluted requirements is that any deaths that occur post-licensure become “coincidental” or “unclassifiable.”

Drs. Puliyel and Phadke describe what happened in India when the country’s National AEFI committee assessed 132 serious AEFI cases reported between 2012 and 2016, including 54 infant deaths that followed administration of a pentavalent all-in-one vaccine intended to protect recipients against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b infections. For babies who survived hospitalization, the committee classified three-fifths (47/78) of the AEFI as causally related to vaccines (with 47% of the incidents viewed as “product-related” and 13% as “error-related”), but they rated nearly all (52/54) of the deaths as either coincidental (54%) or unclassifiable (43%) despite mounting evidence that pentavalent and hexavalent vaccines are increasing the risk of sudden unexpected death in infants.

…doctors who “naïvely” accept biased reports on vaccine safety “are losing the trust of the public and in the process…endangering public health.”

The absurdity and negligence inherent in the ultimately subjective WHO checklist have not escaped the attention of others in India and beyond. In a series of comments published in the journal Vaccine in response to the 2013 publication of the revised tool, commenters issued the following scathing remarks:

  • “Even if a healthy child dies within minutes following vaccination and there is no alternate explanation for the AEFI, even then the powers that be could easily declare that death as coincidental and not due to the vaccine, thanks to the new AEFI. This is dangerous ‘science’.”
  • “Amongst the 20 items of their checklist, no less than 15 (75%) are devoted to refute a vaccine-induced causality [emphasis in original]…. After all and as the authors confess with an astonishing ingenuousness, the main point is to ‘maintain public confidence in immunization programs.'”
  • “People understand that there are no true coincidences — only events that have been made to appear to be coincidental by either a genuine lack of understand[ing] of the overall facts leading to the ‘coincidence’ reported or by the deliberate suppression of the facts, including when…AEFIs that result in death are made to ‘disappear.'”
  • “It seems that huge business in [the] vaccine industry is affecting [the] science of vaccines and we are developing various ways to promote the business at the cost of human lives. …Going for a less sensitive tool for safety concerns is not only illogical but risky for the children of the world.”

Unfortunately, many vaccine proponents appear to be more concerned with forestalling “misconceptions” and “erroneous conclusions about cause and effect” than they are about preventing and identifying adverse events following vaccination. The result, as Dr. Puliyel argues, is that doctors who “naïvely” accept biased reports on vaccine safety “are losing the trust of the public and in the process…endangering public health.

Source Article from https://www.sott.net/article/420805-Robert-F-Kennedy-Jr-The-government-is-covering-up-vaccine-deaths

Related Posts
  California has very strict compulsory vaccination laws for children in school, and as a result
The Facts:The Facts:This article was written by Sayer Ji, Founder of Greenmedinfo.com where this article
The Facts:The Facts:This article was written by Sayer Ji, Founder of Greenmedinfo.com where this article
How far would you go to protect your children from a potential harm? Currently in
On Aug. 23, 2019, New York State Supreme Court Judge Denise Hartman issued an

Hits: 6

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes