February 25, 2016
“Traditionally, the scales of justice are depicted as awaiting the weight of the evidence. A preponderance on one side or the other will tip them to a just conclusion. Indeed, this is the ideal to which we still aspire. Unfortunately, it is rarely found today in our courts. If an attorney finds that the weight of evidence is tipping the scales against his client, he immediately employs one of the myriad techniques of “civil procedure” to have that evidence declared inadmissible, to have his opponent’s witnesses impeached or found incompetent, and to mount a counterattack of his own to tip the scales back to favor his client. This technique is called “practicing law.” Like any other skill, it is honed by constant practice, but this skill depends heavily on its practitioner’s willingness to employ any subterfuge on his client’s behalf. It is as though a football game were being played during which the players were allowed to commit any unsportsmanlike or illegal act in order to gain a point, with the umpire (that is, the judge), actually cooperating in and officially approving the illegal conduct. In legal parlance, this has a name; it is known as “professional courtesy,” because the judge, like the lawyers, is also a member of the bar.”
Source Article from http://henrymakow.com/2016/02/rich-jews-bullied-me-2.html
Related posts:
The CIA's conclusion in 2007: 'US has no choice but to coexist with Iran', - latest Wikileaks
US Senate Staffer Robbed At Gunpoint In DC As Crime Crisis Spirals Out-Of-Control
Washington relies on Moscow’s rocket engines: US admits
Ireland Passes Law Making Independent Media Users ‘CRIMINALS’ Who Are ‘Guilty Until Proven Innocent’
Number of Palestinian refugees in occupied territories has increased by 1 million in the past decade
Iran’s top commander questions objectives of Saudi anti-terrorism coalition