Amnesty International (ai): Increasingly doubts about credibility – Suzanne Nossel, Donatella Rovera: The non

At Amnesty International (ai), there is a growing rumbling. Also in Germany, more and more members do ask, whether they are even still part of the right club. Backgrounds are the completely one-sided reports on individual countries and the silence on human rights violations in other countries.

Originally, Amnesty International (ai) has once begun, as a human rights organization, to be at the side of world’s political prisoners. For this, Amnesty International had earned a great deal of praise. But this is long ago.

The relative block-overlap policy of Amnesty International was quickly a thorn in the eyes of some Western powers and they began to infiltrate the organization systematically. From then on, it went downhill with neutrality. The infiltration of the organization with people, with have really nothing to do with the idea of Amnesty, is continued at a rapid pace since then.


The current high point of infiltration was the appointment of Suzanne Nossel as the Executive Director of Amnesty International in the United States. She is now the highest official of the organization.

In January 2012, Suzanne Nossel has directly joined Amnesty International, as she has left the U.S. State Department. So she comes directly from the government which is responsible for the maintenance of the detention center at Guantanamo. From a government that maintains killers – without any conscious process of law – for unwanted citizens of the U.S. president anywhere in the world.

The maintenance of concentration camp-like facilities as a prisoner of war camp or the death orders of the U.S. president were until a few days hence no problem for Suzanne Nossel. She was loyal and devoted to her government that they will continue to be like this.

Suzanne Nossel was not a typist or cleaning lady in the U.S. regime. Of course, not. She was employed in the responsible position as Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Organizations. To her further background, it is mentioned in an official statement:

“At the State Department, Nossel played a leading role in US engagement at the UN Human Rights Council, including the initiation of groundbreaking human rights resolutions on Iran, Syria, Libya, Cote d’Ivoire … she has served as vice-president of US Business Development at Bertelsmann Media Worldwide, vice-president of strategy and operations for the Wall Street Journal…”

Thus, she was involved in a leading role at the subversive U.S. foreign policy regarding Libya, Iran, Syria and the Ivory Coast.

…and “suddenly”, she is the new head of a human rights organization!

In the current newsletters, which are distributed by Amnesty International USA, they distribute lurid and rabble-rousing articles, which should fuel the conflicts in individual countries.

Amnesty International (ai) was last noticed in the past week with a false report about the conditions in Syria. Against their better knowledge, Amnesty International has widespread lies in its report about the conditions in Syria.

Even the right-conservative “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” (FAZ – notice the last article about the “Houla massacre”, that was committed by the armed militias) is contrary to the statements by Amnesty International (ai), which are only served to increase the pretext for a war against Syria and to prepare the stage for a Western invasion.

Not one victim is helped with this policy of Amnesty International.

Now it seems that the measure is full, and there is spread unrest in the German section of the members of Amnesty International.

An increasing number of German members of Amnesty International are asking themselves whether they get not abused, if Amnesty has degenerated into a mere agitprop troupe of the U.S. administration.

As a side note, Donatella Rovera, the known propaganda-dog of Amnesty International, which washes her hands in innocence every time she has previously misused false reports for propaganda purposes (e.g. Libya, now Syria), has never really left her room in Syria.

According to UN personnel, she has spent a lot time in her room and never went out of the room. Of course, she sure went out of the room some time, but this kind of description by UN personnel in the Syrian capital Damascus tells it all. It stinks like the UN report on Syria, which is based on telephone calls, non-verified information and other dubious sources.

Based on: haraldpflueger.com

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes