Jew World Order

The West plans to intervene in Syria. The question of whether an military intervention must really happen, seems to already answered since a long time, now the focus of the West is apparently on the correct moment for a intervention in Syria.

In this context, war preparations are already being made, such as the delivery of new communications technology of the U.S. to Syria, while there are some rumors, that the U.S. already delivers weapons to Syria over contact persons in Georgia. Just as Saudi Arabia and Qatar are already doing this since months.

The armed militias in Syria received satellite phones with GPS capability, so that they can provide data of places of e.g. a massacre (or staged scenarios) better to the Internet and to the “operators” abroad. Then, the massacre of al-Houla (al Hula) could have just been the beginning.

Not to mention that these things like false-flag actions, the fueling of sectarian fights and the media spin are just parts of e.g. the so-called “Salvador Option“; useful for intended “regime changes”. One can find some information about the “unconventional warfare” of the United States, for example, in this article. The militias, the so-called “Syrian rebels”, have increasingly better and heavier weapons, and they are more than only willing to use them. But in the main media of the NATO countries, this gets hardly mentioned, of course.

These Western editorial offices rather confine themselves to portray the regime in Damascus as a monster, escaped from hell, which never misses an opportunity to commit atrocities. All without any evidence for the atrocities and the accusations. The horrible massacre of al-Houla (Hula) was a good example for the biased coverage and the propaganda-attempts by Western editorial offices of e.g. CNN, BBC and ARD.

The “excuse” by BBC for the use of “opposition propaganda” as allegedly credible source for the reporting about the “Houla massacre” is nice but only the tip of an iceberg of lies and the attempt to sell non-confirmed information and staged clips for propaganda purposes in order to serve the interests of the British government.

The biased reporting, the dissemination of lies and unilateral accusations against the Syrian government in Damascus also ensure that the situation in Syria actually gets more explosive. As usually, the media coverage benefits from headlines, which finally serve the economic interests of the companies. Investigative journalism is a fairy tale, just as the stories about “moderate Islamists”.

Although the Syrian government still sticks to the six-point peace plan by the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and the Syrian army mainly just acts in order to defend themselves, the responsible levels are now willing to strike, when the armed militias and different armed groups of Islamists, criminals and foreign mercenaries do not lay down their weapons. Just normal. The regular army of every state has the duty to protect the civilians and the Syrian army has the face of all sectors of the Syrian society.

However, the blame for the gradual escalation (and here one must remember that it is limited to particular regions in Syria) lies not only at the side of the armed radicals and militias, but especially also on the sides which do equip these radical strangers, criminals and jihadists with weapons, ammo, technical stuff and money. How is it logical to decrease the violence when one still delivers weapons to one side, which is obviously not ready to comply the ceasefire. Of course, the support and the willfully fueling of the violence happen for reasons.

The masterminds of the violence in Syria are exactly the ones who willfully pretend in front of the cameras as if they would care about the Syrian people. They chant empty phrases about human rights and democracy, while their governments support the militias, which have already committed enormous violations of human rights in Syria.

A representative of this hypocritical behavior is Mrs. Hillary Clinton. While Hillary Clinton talks about human rights, and forgets meanwhile willfully the violations of human rights by the U.S. administration, she is working in the intentions to boost the violence in Syria, in order to destabilize the country and primarily, the government and leadership in the different sectors.

Not to mention that the West, the member states of the United Nations (UN), know that the sanctions most heavily harm the Syrian population, but that is the real intention. Let the population suffer till more and more change the sides or do join the ranks of the armed militias and radical Islamists. The events in Syria were congruent to the content of the manuals about “unconventional warfare” from the United States.

Hillary Clinton is a woman with wounded pride, and serves the interests of some sides willfully. Some could mention words like AIPAC and Israel at this point. Hillary Clinton is ready for anything and she wants the military intervention in Syria.

What is likely to prevent the United States from carrying out the intervention, is still the position of Russia and also of China. In addition, the strength of the Syrian army is, also it seems easy to rate for some sides, not really assessable from the outside. The situation in Syria is very confusing and while the majority of the Syrian people still support the President Bashar al-Assad and the so-called reform process, an intervention can not only be implemented from the air.

In addition, the Syrian opposition is much divided, just like the armed militias within Syria; there is no body that represents the views of all and no body of the external Syrian “opposition” represents the opinion of the majority in Syria.

However, they press the lever of the preparations for war more and more. The massacre of al-Houlah (al-Houleh/al Hula) and the atrocities afterwards were just the beginning. It was already presented and this is also a confirmed fact for a lot of experts, that the horrible massacre was not carried out by the Syrian army or the so-called “Shabiha” (Shabi7a), which are a good base, because of the mythic factor, to be misused as perpetrators in stories which have no real evidence; for propaganda purposes.

But despite these information and views of experts and connoisseurs of the local conditions in Syria, some sides and some Western editorial offices still stick to the wrong story, which was immediately distributed after the news of the massacre, without any evidence for it, and this manner of publication even raised the impression that this was an already prepared scenario.

Al-Houlah is, as it is anywhere to read, a turning point in the conflict of Syria. Logically, the massacre provided the best opportunity to increase the pressure on the Syrian government in Damascus and to further continue with the isolation the leadership, and especially to further concentrate on the work how to “quickly” overthrow the Syrian President al-Assad.

However, since neither al-Houla (Hula), al Qubair (Kubeir) nor al-Haffeh (Haffah) have prepared the necessary conditions for an intervention, it just continues. A new UN report by Amnesty International (ai), which was published at the beginning of this week, and also a new report by Human Rights Watch (HRW), which was also published in this week, only rehash and include the old allegations and information. The human rights organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) was never independent from the beginning, and Amnesty International (ai) was transformed in a dependent organization for specific interests.

Who is really yet surprised about the news? Of course, for the United Nations (UN) and these human rights organizations, the Syrian regime of hell is ready for anything and apparently rapes and abuses anyone, who crosses the path of the killing soldiers. Already the stories about the “human shields” were not logically. Such “human shields”, as it is known and as it often was carried out by different sides since centuries, serve the occupiers and groups which have entrenched themselves in an area, building or even in a district of a village, a city. The side, which wants to liberate this area, has no real benefits of “human shields”.

The reports by the UN and these allegedly independent human rights organizations are just further evidence of the intentions of the West, especially the NATO countries and the two Gulf States, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which have already a lot of blood on their hands, and try by the demand for new blood, to wash away / to obscure the old blood. The history gets rewritten by the winners. An fresh example for this are the entries about the behavior of e.g. Amnesty International (ai) on Wikipedia, when it comes to Libya.

The staff of Amnesty International (ai) was, according to their own information, without an official permit in Syria. In March and April, they traveled through the north of the country (mainly in the provinces of Aleppo and Idleb) and have visited allegedly 23 villages.

What staff of Amnesty International? How could they enter Syria and how could they carry out all the allegedly interviews for so a long time, without being noticed? Considering, that the Syrian Secret Service is allegedly so feared and is present everywhere. This is not really reported. In addition, as already stated here, UN people in Damascus have reported, that Donatella Rovera has, while her stay, never really left her room.

So, Amnesty International (ai) has made surveys with people, allegedly, which are used to generalize the situation and to derive a “pattern of abuses” across Syria. And it is such a “black and white” situation in Syria, really! No surprise, that more and more people put the credibility of Amnesty International into question.

The allegedly surveys confirmed the allegations of the Islamist “Syrian National Council” (SNC) and the NATO-vassals against the Syrian regime and the Syrian army: e.g. soldiers kidnap children and use them as “human shields”, as already mentioned some lines earlier. On the conquering expeditions of the Syrian army, women and children are raped and abused, houses are looted and burned.

The presentations by many Syrians do sound different: They are happy when the Syrian army is in the villages, because they feel protected. They even demand more protection by the Syrian soldiers so that they can protect their families and homes and are able to go on with their daily life. The armed militias, also known as “Syrian rebels” or “protesters for a democratic Syria”, want to occupy zones for special reasons, they invade villages and plunder, take hostages, rape women, torture people, kill people and also take revenge on those families who do not want to join them, have other opinions, religions, sects, or are at the false location to the false time.

The horrible massacre of al-Houla (Hula) is a good example for this, but also friends in Homs, Hama and other regions of Syria have directly confirmed this to us since months. Friends, who are trusted and credible, because they have to suffer on location because of these armed militias, groups of Islamists, jihadists, criminals and foreign mercenaries.

Amnesty International also ignored the events in al-Houlah in the new “report”, and takes this village as an example for the brutality of the Syrian army. Interesting, isn`t it? No word in the report about the violence that the “rebels” are ready to apply and which they carry out daily.

In the new report by Amnesty International, Donatella Rovera, the propaganda front of Amnesty International, reiterates the call for an embargo against Syria, so that no weapons can be further delivered to the government. Wow. And what about the weapons for the armed militias and Islamists? Interesting one-sided conclusion, Donatella.

Donatella Rovera acts like she always did in the recent years. It is no surprise that Rovera cares about Syria under the coverage by the human rights organization Amnesty International. About the arming of the “Syrian rebels”, not a word can be found. Furthermore, they skillful prevent to record the infiltration of radical Islamic and Islamist forces. Some might wonder, whether they really traveled through the north of Syria for a long time? At least, it looks like the report of the UN (United Nations), which is also based on telephone calls, not confirmed statements and further dubious sources.

The report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) is in no way different than the report by Amnesty International (ai). A confirmation of the credibility of both reports? Sorry to say, but that is a misbelief. The copy and paste-method also works for these human rights organizations, just as good as it works for so-called journalists. Both reports cannot be taken to give each other credibility. So, now you have new outrageous accusations against the dictator Assad and his henchmen, and you can continue to beat the drums of war. What a perfect situation.

The fact that some sides want to remove al-Assad by all means, shows the news coverage by the NATO countries quite clearly. If even the massacre and the give faked (staged) reports are not enough, one makes use of the behavior, to spread rumors about the attitude of Russia.

Last Friday, headlines were published and distributed, which stated again, that Russia would change its attitude toward Assad. They even wrote of rumors that match Westerwelle and Fabius with Lavrov would come to depose Assad after Yemeni model. While most newspapers have, at least, noted that these are rumors and Lavrov has denied this, other Western newspapers have ignored this small detail in their reports. Good journalism.

Certainly, Russia has stressed on several occasions that it is not about protecting Assad, but to prevent escalation and to the possible outbreak of a nationwide war and that the Syrian people should decide for themselves.

Clearly, Russia has its interests in Syria, but America has also interests, just like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Germany, France, Britain and, not surprising, Israel and Jordan, but they do not respect human rights, they do not care about the introduction of democracy and that they do not care about the Syrian population should already be clear.

It’s about geopolitical issues and the supremacy in the Middle East, and thus also about the access to Asia. Both Russia and China see themselves threatened by the U.S. and its aspirations. Syria is now the “tipping the scales”, which will determine the future for the upcoming years. The fact that there is a high level of violence in Syria, nobody denies. All sides, which are involved in the conflict, proceed with brutality, and also civilians are victims.

However, the Syrian army gives the people time to flee to adjacent villages, and / or to barricade themselves in their homes, before the area is attacked in order to liberate it from the armed militias and Islamists, that is happening in acceptance of the most locals.

Particularly hard-fought are the border towns that lie on the smuggling route, and where many weapons were already secured. But the NATO media hide these details in its coverage of the situation in Syria. Those are not the messages that would justify a war against the Syrian government.

Russia, China, Syria and the head of the UN observers remain committed to the implementation of the Annan plan. It seems the only way to create a political solution, but the mission of the UN observers constantly is in danger because of the massive use of violence and fighting in different places, mainly in the provinces of Homs and Idleb. Next month, the continuation of the observer mission and thus the maintenance of the Annan Plan will be decided.

Whether the Annan plan will be still officially get supported by the NATO countries is questionable. For these forces, and especially Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the plan was actually only implemented to achieve a truce and to upgrade the Armed with new weapons, after the defeat in Baba Amr, Homs.

You remember back: The truce was reached in mid-April, before one could read again and again that the rebels had almost no ammunition to put up a fight. Only days after occurrence of the ceasefire, is was announced at the meeting of the so-called “Friends of Syria” (Enemies of Syria), that the rebels will be financially supported.

Afterwards, arms and money have flowed to the rebels in Syria and they still flow into the hands of these militias. Modern technology, a better collaboration between the strategies of the “operators” within and outside Syria. The armed militias have picked up their fight again. The opponents of Syria were the ones, who have explained the ceasefire as being dead and who have agreed immediately to the idea that the plan of Kofi Annan has failed. Again, one should ask, who benefits from the chaos in Syria.

On Monday, Obama and Putin will meet each other on the margins of the G-20 summit. The main topic at their meeting will be Syria and Iran. Obama will surely try to persuade Russia to take its protective hands of Syria. The U.S. and Saudi Arabia are thirsty to Syria, the last Arab country that refuses the imperialistic intentions of the United States and where one is not able to find only a trace of an military base by the United States.

No surprise, that some honorable people were already able to see through this what is happening. These people can answer the questions, why it is happening, why now and what are the real interests behind the common pretexts that successfully work in Western minds.

Putin cares about the last access to the Mediterranean and to Europe, and he is willing to protect this for Russia. Both sides will not be able to convince the other side on Monday. Russia will not be able to convince Barack Obama to stop arming the militias and Islamists, and to care about everything else politically.

One has to wait until Monday probably, and hope, that it will not end in a real confrontation between the two heads of state.