Mike Huckabee: Ron Paul Must Change Stance on Iran to be Electable

August 20th, 2011

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Robert Wanek
MNchange.org
August 19, 2011

Mike Huckabee Bashes Ron Paul And Avoids Iran Question

This past Saturday at the GOP straw poll in Ames, IA several members of Minnesota We Are Change took to the Iowa State University to cover this critical event in this years election process. Along the way we ran into former presidential hopeful and Fox News host Mike Huckabee. He quickly turned our question about Ron Paul’s second place finish in the poll, to an opportunity to smear Ron Paul and discredit his non-interventionist foreign policy. Then When I asked Mr. Huckabee about the 1953 coup that led to our Iran hostility , as mentioned in the Iowa Debate by Ron Paul, he ignored it and continued ranting about Paul’s foreign policy stances and small chances of being taken seriously by america. In closing we attempted to ask Mike about the CFR and got no response.

MNChange Huckabee Extended footage

Robert Wanek, Sean Wright, Adam Miller, Clinton Lambeth, Alex Nitescu, Steve Tiongson, and Amy Falkenborg interviewed everyone willing to share their thoughts with us. Some Main Stream Media answered questions but filtered to get their Propoganda off, and dodged questions about the CFR and Bildeberg, Imagine that….

Print this page.

Comment Rules

6 Responses to “Mike Huckabee: Ron Paul Must Change Stance on Iran to be Electable”

War is peace.
Mike Huckabee …
we hear the well-paid, Israel-firster telling lies
Shocking!
Their argument is not supported nor is it debunked by the issue of what happened in 1953. Huckabee’s argument has to do with what Iran has recently stated is its intention to bomb Israel first and USA second.

So then until this argument is addressed honestly all the knowledge about 1953 is of no importance.

Did Iran actually say that? That might be open for debate. Maybe it is not open for debate. If Iran has stated they intend to nuke the United States then that does change what our foreign policy should be toward Iran.

This would place Paul in a losing position. So then does huckleberry have a valid point or not? Discussion of who started it does not matter when determining what must be done at this juncture. Ron Paul should preempt the inevitable ambushing on this subject by prefacing all such discussion on Iran with the whole truth of the matter. Last thing Paul needs is an ambush clipped and cropped for maximum media advantage.

.
- Iran offered to help the US in finding the 9/11 perpetrators. They held mass vigils the night of 9/11. Then one day one guy said they were in an “axis of evil.” and tensions arose.
  If the US could reasonably connect Iran to an attack on US forces, we’d already have gone to war. I would say that’s pretty peaceful considering the US has surrounded them for nearly 10 years. Violent people would certainly have done something.
- If we look back to the league of Nations when most of the “ARAB Nations” walked out and told the NWO to go to hell, oh that was 1927? 1953 was just a contiuation of the external manipulation of the NWO- PLAN. They (NWO) have had the mid-east as the way to achive thier NWO goal for years, GOOGLE Albert Pike. He had a three war plan. That was 1862? Check it out.
Mike (Masonic Baptist Bastard) Huckelberry is the same as all the rest the establismet front men and women. When asked about the treachery, they ignore you and slither away.