RSS Feed
June 17th, 2016 
Awake Goy Donald Trump has been taking baby steps in his promised effort to “make America great again.” But those expecting great things had better listen to their candidate. Better yet, ask him about it.
He has not even been nominated yet, yet Donald Trump is “making his bones” with the establishment by carefully-choreographed lobbying of the NRA to support gun-purchase bans for those on the no fly list. Children as young as 18 months and 4 have been put on the “no fly” list, apparently as some sort of pre-crime existential threat, with no way to find out how they got on or how to get off. (1)(2)(3)(4) Trump has also been supporting a gun ban for those on the “terrorist watch-list” (in which people are watched, but apparently never apprehended until after some terrorist act.) [Source]
These are, of course, the same measures being supported more openly and blatantly by his prospective rival, Goldman-Sachs “valedictorian” Hillary Clinton.
Paul Ryan and his Republican cohort caved in on June 15th to a Democrat filibuster and agreed to allow a vote on the above measures. With more than a few Republicans being closet homosexuals, and others counting on funding from homosexual-oriented groups such as the “Log Cabin Republicans” (don’t ask me to explain that one to you!), expect to see quite a few defections from the party line. This bill has a chance of passage and, if that happens, will drive the last stake into the heart of the 2nd Amendment.
What this bill would do is give any political group in power the authority to disarm its opponents – which is exactly what the 2nd Amendment was designed to prevent – the political process degenerating into open thuggery and even civil war. On any whim, a person with unpopular beliefs can be placed on this list and face an endless bureaucratic maze trying to get off, at the end of which would be the new Supreme Court with a majority of leftists and anti-gun judges. The no-fly list is completely against every legal principle in the West since the Magna Carta – no accusers, no indictment and bill of charges, no conviction, no recourse and no penalties for abuse.
But my question for the government is that, even if someone is on your “terrorist watch-list”, why would you want to stop them from buying a gun? Because, if you do that and this person is a terrorist, then he might get clued in and secretly get weapons from Mexican or Central American drug cartels. Curiously, these are the very groups it has been revealed the U.S. Government indirectly provided ASSAULT RIFLES to in the “Fast and Furious” operation. (5) More importantly, you would reveal to the subject the fact that he or she IS on the terrorist watch list! This would stop them from contacting members of their terror network. The same goes for the no-fly list. If someone on it was a real threat, wouldn’t it be more useful to screen and watch the person more carefully in hopes of learning connections and intentions? Why tell them they’re under observation?
Let’s call a spade a spade. I grew up around cops and this legislation makes no sense unless one considers it a political weapon being used by one faction to completely disarm a large cross-section of the American population, for which some sort of major political/economic coup is being planned. It in no way would prevent an Orlando-type shooting, in which the claimed perpetrator was a security guard (with full clearance from 2007 to 2015) with a major U.S. Government contractor, G4S (formerly Wackenhut). (6) It would prevent law-abiding Americans from getting weapons, while still leaving the borders open to arms trafficking by alien criminal gangs. And how would this type of legislation stop the mythical “lone wolf”–wouldn’t significant weapons purchases be the only indicator that such an individual needed to be watched more closely? (Of course, a real “lone wolf” wouldn’t be on the radar, would he or she? So logically you’d have to disarm EVERYONE to know for sure.)
It’s almost as if someone studied the Russian Revolution and is determined to repeat the process, only with a little less damage to the economy (since the financial backers of the 1917 Revolution pretty much own the means of production now.) The question Americans should be asking, in light of Trump’s statements and NRA meeting, is: to what extent is Trump willing to participate in such an endeavor?
Endnotes:
(1) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/14/nyregion/14watchlist.html?_r=0
(2) https://www.rt.com/usa/list-tsa-jetblue-riyannas-950/
(3) http://www.scpr.org/news/2016/04/05/59257/lawsuit-challenging-us-no-fly-list-includes-4-year/
(4) http://www.upworthy.com/a-7-month-old-baby-on-the-no-fly-list-yup-but-thats-not-the-most-absurd-thing-about-it
(5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
(6) https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2016/06/14/g4s-employer-of-orlando-shooter-is-a-front-for-cia/
Source Article from http://www.renegadetribune.com/donald-making-america-great-disarming/
Posted in 
Tags: 
