GOD cursed the Jews out of Jerusalem for life, for practising Satanism. Jesus Christ tried to preach the word of God, but they crucified him for it.

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D. “The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”

ONCE WE UNITE We can stand up against those that keep seeking to divide us, with false news, and staged terrorist attacks. Together we can stop working for them, stop paying taxes, bills, fees, fraudulent debt etc. The end of the fiat currency that is used to enslave us begins. No more slavery, debt poverty terrorism illness evil and control e.t.c.

REAL MUSLIMS are never ever shown on TV News networks.  The Muslims you see on TV are the Jews dressed as Muslims, defaming them, to spread racism and hate among us. Wake up and stop hating false enemies that the Jews invent for us to focus on.

OUR NATURE IS SOVEREIGN (we are born free) and so, obviously, God wants us to be liberated from earthly rulers.

Jews were behind the Crucades, Ku Klux Klan, Spanish Inquisition, killing millions of real Christians, in the name of God, hiding behind the Roman Catholic Church (Vatican) spreading Terror... just like they are now doing to the Islamic religion.

JUDAISM = ZIONISM today, started way back in 740bc when the Amalek Edomite Khazarian Turks (now called JEWS), converted to Judaism for political reasons. A stolen identity and history, now needs a name to become complete, so the term "Jew" was invented in 1770. All history and so called "holy books" were re-written to accomodate the lies, to create the Satanic Jew... which has nothing to do with Israelite Hebrews.

HATE CRIMES. Today, the whole world already knows that U.S.A, England and Israel (Rothschild & Co.) plans attacks and wars, using proxy regimes in every country, (so no one blames the Jews) tying them to the dates of Jewish holidays. It’s been noticed that not only terrorist attacks and military operations are planned on Jewish holidays, but also carrying out those terrorist attacks is planned so that the funerals from the attacks would fall on the feasts of the Jews

THE AGENDA: To destroy Christianity, just as they have destroyed empires, nations, heterosexual identities and nuclear families. The agenda is to strip people of power, control, unity, identity and health, leaving us defenceless in the face of a Jewish One-World Tyranny.

JUDAISM = SATANISM is the only religion that have sex (thrusting their pelvis) when they pray to Sex Goddess Shekinah. Jews today continue to murder Christian and non-Jewish children to use their blood in Jewish rituals and holidays

The invention of the Muslim Terrorist is the latest invention by the Jews, to spread fear and dismantle governments that are not yet puppets of the Jews...or have decided to stop serving the Jews.. justifying raping the World, and slaughtering billions of innocent genuine semite and gentile families in every country for power and control annually... under the illusion of Freedom, Democracy, War on Terror, or anything else that can justify their invasions and mass murders for their 2 horned God.

Jewish Rabbi claims Islam is Israel's broom
"We control Islam, and we'll use it to destroy the west."


The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Problem, Reaction, Solution, is a Jew conjuring trick within their forever wandering diaspora in order to play the victim, and influence global changes in laws to protect all their historic and contemporary lies ……Who still falls for this old Yiddish trick manipulating policy changes to hide and protect Jewish crimes, acting out Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution against the gentile, changes which gives (((them))) immunity when hiding the truth.

Jews killing Christian Arabs again for their 2 horned God

Everyone was talking about Jesus! But when it came time to speak up for him in public, no one said a word. All were afraid of the Jews. Fear can stifle our witness. Although many people talk about Christ in church, when it comes to making a public statement about their faith, they are often embarrassed. Jesus says that he will acknowledge us before God if we acknowledge Him before others.

All 'Jews' today are the Khazars (converts) and Edomites, some call them the Khazarian Mafia (KM) hellbent on a World Government, as was the ruling Jewish class in the times of Jesus. Herod was an Edomite, after Esau ( Malachi 1: 3 ; Romans 9:13 ), not Jacob Israel. These Jew Fraudsters believe themelves to be Israelites (Hebrews) or from the royal tribe of Judah, claim the Bible Consignor gives themselves mandate to rule the whole world ( Psalm 2: 6-9 , Psalm 2: 10-11 , Deuteronomy 20: 10-14 , Deuteronomy 20 : 12-17 , Isaiah 60: 5 , 60: 10-11 , 60:12 , 60: 14-16 ,Psalm 2: 8 ; ), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah, most of the apostles were Israelites, only one of them was Jewish; Judas. The first time Jews are Mentioned in the Bible, is in II Kings 16: 6105: 44 ; 111: 6 ). Jesus was a Galilean or resident of Galilee ( Matthew 26:69 ; John 7:41 (and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war with the Jews and drave the Jews from elathane. The 'Jews' in 'Jesus' time were Edomites/Turkic Mongols/Khazars/Amalak/Gog/Magog. Edom or Edomite had BEEN translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated IDUMAEANS-Judean into Iewes. The first "Jews" were Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite.Source

Judaism says to kill Christians

Judaism says to kill Christians


Related Posts
“Do you think Judaism will ever recover from having been hijacked by Zionism?” a friend
Zionism Contradicts Judaism New York historian, journalist, and lecturer, Alfred M. Lilienthal, was the leading 20th
  January 22, 2019 "Some may call it Communism, but I call it what it
By looking to the Jewish religion as the source of Israeli cruelty, Walker is making
Karl Marx wrote:  "The Jew emancipated himself ... by making himself master of the money-market...

Hits: 605

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit and used her to train their dogs

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit and used her to train their dogs

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit, and used her to train their dogs.

This was posted on Facebook, directly by the Christian Palestinian victims.

Related Posts
June 11, 2019 By Eoin Higgins One of the key fears that critics of mass
"The study of [true] philosophy consists in knowing not what men have thought, but WHAT IS
By Jason Hickel Source Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, and his wife,
How Britain's Royal Jews stole $45 trillion from India And lied about it. by Jason

Hits: 744

Jewish Sharia Law

Jewish Sharia Law

The more I look at Judaism, the more I see that Islam is a just a clone of Judaism.

And we can see why Jews keep bragging why their crime rate is so low — they just don’t report the crime!

From a rare New York Times article, one only has to substitute “Muslim” for “Jew”, “mullah” for “rabbi” and “Sharia” for “Beth Din”, to see that Islam and Judaism are closely tied in Sharia law tradition.

    • Ultra-Orthodox Jews [have] long [been] forbidden to inform on one another without permission from the rabbis who lead them…


    • Members of this close-knit community, who refer to themselves as the “haredim,” meaning those who fear God, reject modern secular culture and keep strict control over what they consider internal affairs.

For centuries, disputes involving children, marriage and business have been decided by rabbinical courts called beth dins, which do not report their findings to the secular authorities, even when they judge someone guilty.

    • Taboos codified long ago during times of persecution discourage community members from informing on other Jews; violations can result in ostracism.


    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Is the Judiac institution of Beth Din nothing more than Islamic Sharia Law?

Jewish Lawyers screw Christian men in secular courts,
get their own divorce in Jewish courts

While American Christian men are being taken to the cleaners by Jewish lawyers, Jewish lawyers have their own divorce proceedings done outside the judicial system they work for.

Their divorce and their child protective services are done in a Rabbinical Court called a beth din.

Perhaps what is good for Jews would be good for Christians in place of the plague of “no-fault” divorce. Marriage Arbitration in one’s Church would prevent many needless broken homes and their resulting broken children.

Jewish media-Scribes attack without worries

And from this same New York Times article, one can deduce why Jewish media-Scribes have been able to impute scurrilous accusations against Catholic Church priests without anyone being able to accuse them of hypocrisy, as in the Rabbi child molestation abuses which are hidden from public view.

Again, because the serious and heinous crimes by Jews are not being reported to the proper authorities, Catholic priests become prey to these killers.

We are not talking about the Jewish religious crime of working on the Sabbath not being reported — we are talking about the religious and criminal crime of child abuse NOT being REPORTED.

    • Now, a growing number of haredi Jews in Brooklyn say they do not think they can get justice from the rabbinical courts, which in several high-profile cases have exonerated people who were later criminally convicted of child abuse. And although some advocates for victims contend that the district attorney has been too accommodating of the rabbinical hierarchy — a charge that Mr. Hynes denies — more families are turning to his office for help.


    • Prosecutors say that since last year 40 minors have agreed to testify about abuse in court, if necessary. And Mr. Hynes’s office has been asked for advice by prosecutors with jurisdictions that include other large haredi enclaves in the Northeast.


    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Indeed, Survivors for Justice founder Ben Hirsch confirms that there is abuse of children in the Jewish community and keeping it a secret only helps abusers of Jewish children.

    • Children in haredi families are no more or less likely to suffer sexual abuse than others, according to several recent studies. But Ben Hirsch, founder of Survivors for Justice, a New York group whose members include haredi Jews molested as children in communities nationwide, said

the clandestine handling of molestation cases had kept leaders from dealing with the problem and made it easier for predators.

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

This site has said so much in its previous article — Rabbi Rap Sheet —

“Religious Sensitivities”

For Christian child abusers, the abuser loses his job — because he is sitting in prison! Then after serving his time in prison, he has the additional punishment of the Megan’s Law “Scarlet Letter” hung around his neck when he has to register as a child molester with the authorities reporting where he lives to one and all.

Not so with Jewish child molesters — who have “religious sensitivities”!

    • David Zwiebel, executive vice president of Agudath Israel of America, a group representing many haredi factions, offered the moderate view…

he added that prosecutors should recognize “religious sensitivities” by seeking alternatives to prison, to avoid depriving a family of its breadwinner

    • , or by finding appropriate Orthodox homes for children removed from abusive families.


    • “The district attorney should be careful not to be seen as making a power grab from rabbinic authority,” Mr. Zwiebel said.


    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Does this sound like an invitation for abuse? — Yes indeed !

And once again, Jewish children suffered for the bad decisions of Jewish authorities.

    • Advocates for victims say similar views have informed some of the Brooklyn rabbinical leadership’s worst judgments, allowing prominent rabbis who were repeatedly accused of abuse to keep their jobs and reputations.


    • In 2000, Rabbi Baruch Lanner, a charismatic youth leader and yeshiva principal who was the focus of students’ abuse claims for more than 20 years — and was exonerated by a beth din — became the subject of an exposé in The Jewish Week, which found more than 60 accusers. The article led to a criminal investigation and a seven-year prison term for Rabbi Lanner.


    • Another rabbi, Yehuda Kolko, a grade school teacher at a Flatbush yeshiva, was accused of sexually abusive behavior by parents and former students numerous times over 30 years. The complaints were dismissed by rabbinical authorities, however, until New York magazine wrote about them in 2006.


    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009


Jewish Fatwa

Muslim Mullahs are well know to issue Fatwas against anyone who demeans Islam in the slightest degree. Simply drawing a picture of Muhammad is a death sentence.

Now we find that Judaism has fatwas as well.

In a Jewish Fatwa, in order to obtain your death sentence, all you have to do is report a credible factual crime of child abuse to the appropriate government officials.

…one rabbi mentioned frequently on blogs cites ancient doctrine that justifies killing someone who informs on a fellow Jew.

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

One is left to assume that Jewish “justified killing” can be done by any means available, not just by the standard Islamic method of beheading.

Fear of a Jewish Fatwa

Fearing a Jewish Rabbi “Death Wish” Fatwa against him for reporting child abuse, here is the troubles which one Jewish father had to go through before he would feel free to report the abuse of his 6-year-old son.

The father had to get a Jewish “Permission” Fatwa from a Rabbi, just to be able to bring justice to his 6-year-old son.

For, committing a “sin” in Judaism can get you killed.

    • When his 6-year-old son told him one day that Rabbi Kolko had sexually abused him, the father said he resolved to go to the police because he knew that the Brooklyn hierarchy had protected the rabbi in the past.


    • But first he made a detour. “I booked a flight to Jerusalem,” he said. “I made an appointment to speak with a very prominent rabbi” who had written sympathetically about abuse victims.


    • “He told me it would be O.K. to report this teacher to the police,” the father said.

“He told me that if I reported him I would not be committing a sin.”

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution


    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009


Related Posts
The city of Minneapolis has set up a hotline for residents to report citizens who
Swedish lawmakers celebrated International Women’s Day by legalizing wife beating within the Islamic community, citing
A documentary about a Syrian family on Germany’s Spiegel TV has caused controversy in the
Michael Hoffman: America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law My bedtime reading is the
In the latest bit of insanity from the left-wing, a Muslim psychologist has claimed that

Hits: 536

The War On Drugs hoax

The War On Drugs hoax

Related Posts
A GP in Britain is urging fellow doctors to prescribe singing as an alternative to
An audit of New York state’s Medicaid program found that registered sex offenders received $63,000
The Facts:A new study has linked heartburn drugs linked to fatal heart and kidney disease,
   Death risk increases the longer such drugs are used Extended use of popular drugs

Hits: 594

The real enemy is at home

The real enemy is at home

Related Posts
Tasnim – Commander of the Iranian Navy Rear Admiral Hossein Khanzadi said the enemy has
Last week, the House of Representatives voted in favor of a Labor, Health and Human
Trump: “I Think I Know” Who Was Behind 9/11 Attacks Also arrested in the aftermath
IRNA – Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri
  June 12, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/06/talmudism-not-islam-is-america.html

Hits: 646

The Satanic Cult that rules the world

The Satanic Cult that rules the world


Related Posts
The United Nations’ World Refugee Day, observed annually on June 20, should not merely represent
Caitlin Johnstone, The Mind Unleashed Waking TimesIt can be very difficult to figure out what’s
Because ‘Another World Is Possible,’ Tens Of Thousands Of Activists Stage Climate Mobilizations In Germany
Tensions in the Persian Gulf are reaching a point of no return. In recent weeks,
The UCC Connection – How the Uniform Commercial Code ‘secretly took over’ the world The

Hits: 631

Why do Children go missing every year

Why do Children go missing every year

Jewish Blood Libels and Child Sacrifices to Satan, Moloch, Baal.

Related Posts
The AN-32 military aircraft disappeared in Mechuka in Arunachal Pradesh near the border with China
  At least 5 people have died after a series of landslides in the Eastern Region
The aircraft went missing an hour after take-off from an airbase in northeastern India. It
More than 120 missing children have been found in just one day during a wide-scale
Government agencies have, under duress, declassified millions of pages of documents in recent years. But

Hits: 690

The Invention of the word JEW

The Invention of the word JEW


The word “Jew” is a relatively modern invention used, seemingly indiscriminately and interchangeably, by 18th century redactors to describe Israelites, Judahites and Judaeans. It first appeared in these eighteenth century Bibles and it first appears within these redactions in 2 Kings 16:6 …. in an episode that describes a war between Israel and Judah: when Rezin, king of Syria and Pekah, king of Israel went to war with wicked Ahaz, king of Judah. The Syrians “drove the Jews from Elath” who were in possession of it and so here is the first time that the inhabitants of the kingdom of Judah are called “Jews” when more properly they should be called Judahites. However, the point here is this: the very first time the word “Jew” is found in the modern Bible, they are at war with Israel.
Edomites are therefore descended from Edom (Esau) whose descendants later intermarried with the Turks to produce a Turco-Edomite mixture which later became known as Khazars. That is, most of today’s Jews are descendants of this interbreeding that produced a race called Khazars who had once governed an empire called Khazaria. Furthermore, this hybrid race Edomite/Turk/Khazar who created the Khazar kingdom and who between the seventh and ninth centuries AD, adopted the religion of Judaism. And, it is these Khazar Jews who are the ancestors of the vast majority of today’s Jewish people. That is, Edomite/Turk/Khazars are the ancestors of the modern “Jews” including the Torah-true and Zionist Jews who spuriously claim right to the land of Palestine claiming it it is theirs by biblical demands and ancestral rights.

Consequently, the majority of today’s Jewish people are known as “Jews” not because they are Judahites and descended from Jacob/Israel but because their Edomite/Turk/Khazar ancestors in their Kingdom of Khazaria adopted the religion of Judaism, called themselves “Jews” and arrogated the Birthright Promises and Bible Covenants belonging to the Israelites, but especially those belonging to the Judahites.

Thus, “Jews” are not Israelites and certainly they are not Judahites. Hence, modern Jews are not heir to the Bible Covenants nor to the ancient Nation of Israel given by Yahweh to the Israelites and the Judahites and so have no Divine Right or biblical mandate to the modern Land of Palestine.

Similarly, Jesus of Nazareth was not a “Jew” he was a Judahite, and Jesus Christ was not “King of the Jews.”

Related Posts
The International Conference on Palestine held in Istanbul between April 27-29 brought together many speakers
Shuai Geng quit his job last year to pursue a life of idle pursuits, producing
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK HERE“#1917LIVE: The Russian Revolution in Tweets” was published following a year-long interactive
Next Story Government secrecy is running rampant in an age where more and more people
Never afraid of speaking truth to power and educating the masses about the powers that

Hits: 4046

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

Related Posts
Sen. Bernie Sanders gave a very revealing answer when he was asked how he could
The OECD may not be able to include employer-based health insurance premiums into its model,
Funding The Green New Deal Without Raising Taxes And Creating Massive Debt As alarm bells
Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has refused to pay an outstanding tax bill to the IRS,

Hits: 599

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack School Shootings and Muslim Terrorist Groups

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack School Shootings and Muslim Terrorist Groups

Related Posts
Watching the Trump administration’s push for war with Iran, news consumers may find it hard
  A man has been arrested in Brussels on suspicion of planning an attack on the
  Rocket fire has killed 12 civilians in a regime-held village in northwestern Syria, state news
Turkish security forces have killed a prominent member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) militant group

Hits: 417

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Related Posts
Britain’s internal secret service MI5 has been criticized for breaching laws on a serious
A former Secret Service agent assigned to the Vice President Joe Biden residence claims that
Uncle Sam has a problem in his South American “backyard” with those uppity Venezuelans who
Every investor worth his or her salt knows that buying

Hits: 622

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas


Related Posts
Left-wing superstar Madonna says she feels like there’s something “sexual” about seeing Jesus Christ “practically
  April 19, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/04/why-christ-was-crucified.html
John W. Whitehead, Guest Waking Times“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is
Jesus Christ was not a Jew https://youtu.be/MCphuicYt0M https://youtu.be/mAXQI8JALfk
January 29th, 2019 By Nick Polizzi Guest writer for Wake Up World What do Jesus, Muhammad,

Hits: 737

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist


Related Posts
Watching the Trump administration’s push for war with Iran, news consumers may find it hard
  A man has been arrested in Brussels on suspicion of planning an attack on the
  Rocket fire has killed 12 civilians in a regime-held village in northwestern Syria, state news
Turkish security forces have killed a prominent member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) militant group

Hits: 556

Are you a real Christian?

Are you a real Christian?

Or are you led by the devil himself.

Related Posts
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/11/culturewars-logosrising-is-christian-anti-semitism-responsible-for-the-poway-synagogue-shooting-e-michael-jones-published-on-jun-11-2019/
Good day Rabbi Friedland, During this past Shabbat’s service, I distributed an unauthorized “Prayer for Peace”
    Source Article from http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/05/mike-pompeo-visits-third-temple-sanhedrin-synagogue-why-video/
  May 28, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/05/earnest-christian.html
POWAY, California — A Southern California synagogue where a gunman killed a woman and wounded

Hits: 549

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

Related Posts
MNA – Vice-President for Science and Technology Sorena Sattari said on Tue. that commercialization of
Press TV – Syria lashes out at the United States over its new sanctions targeting
MNA – Iranian Deputy Defense Minister Brigadier General Taghizadeh left Tehran for Moscow on Tuesday
IRNA – Apart from defensive capabilities, “our biggest asset and means of deterrence are the
Tasnim – Commander of the Iranian Navy Rear Admiral Hossein Khanzadi said the enemy has

Hits: 611

Israel-founded firms ‘making impact’ in New York State economy

Israeli-founded companies are making a “substantial impact” on the New York State economy by generating significant revenue and hiring New Yorkers, according to the findings of a study released by the New York – Israel Business Alliance.

The independent study, released Tuesday, showed that Israeli-founded companies in New York directly contributed $18.6 billion in revenue in 2018. The economic benefit to New York jumped to $33.8 billion when factoring in additional spending on goods and services in the local economy, representing 2.02% of the state’s Gross Domestic Product.

The 506 Israel-founded companies in New York State directly employed 24,850 New Yorkers and indirectly employed 27,502 when accounting for the additional demand for local goods and services, the study said.

When looking at recent growth trends, the study found that from 2014 to 2016, Israeli companies secured $3.5 billion in venture capital funding and, in 2016 alone, were responsible for more than 20 percent of the total capital raised in New York State.

From 2016 to 2018, the growth continued. During those years, Israeli-founded businesses had a 9.5% year-over-year growth for direct revenue generated, while the rest of the state grew by 4.2%.

In addition, Israeli-founded businesses added new jobs at double the state’s rate: Israeli companies saw 2.5% job growth while the rest of the state had 1.2%.

New York State is home to five Israeli-founded unicorns – startups valued at $1 billion and above: Compass, a real estate tech firm, Lemonade, an online insurer, Payoneer, a financial services company, Taboola, a content discovery firm, and WeWork, the co-working space developer.

From 2009 to 2018, 436 Israeli-founded companies opened and maintained offices in New York State, the report said.

“For anyone who has spent time in New York over the past decade, it’s evident that Israeli businesses are flourishing here,” New York – Israel Business Alliance founder Aaron Kaplowitz said. “For the first time, we’re able to quantify their impact and use data to help create additional jobs and generate more revenue across New York State.”

The aim of the New York – Israel Business Alliance is to create economic opportunities between New York State and Israel.

Stax Inc., a global market research firm, conducted the study.

Source Article from https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-founded-firms-making-impact-in-new-york-state-economy/

Related Posts
Watching the Trump administration’s push for war with Iran, news consumers may find it hard
    BREAKING: General Flynn Uncovered Massive Clinton Scandal Linked to Terrorist Funding – Was
Mark always had panic attacks and would break down frequently due to the brain-washing -
Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project Waking TimesThe ostensible land of the free has more prisoners per population

Hits: 38

US, Iran tensions show cyberattacks becoming part of warfare — ex-NSA chief

The recent tensions between the US and Iran and its spillover into mutual cyberattacks point to such warfare becoming an expected part of hostilities, Mike Rogers, a former director of the US National Security Agency and a former head of the US Cyber Command, said Tuesday at a conference in Tel Aviv.

“We see that cyber, which has been an ongoing part of daily competition between states, will be part of the conflict between nations,” Rogers said at the Cyber Week conference at Tel Aviv University.

An Iranian minister said Monday that the US was unsuccessful in its cyberattacks against Iran after Tehran downed an American surveillance drone late last week.

On Sunday the New York Times reported US military and intelligence officials were drafting plans for additional cyberattacks against Iranian targets.

Current and former officials told the Times the White House was drafting a wide range of covert operations that include disabling Iranian boats used to conduct shipping attacks in and around the Strait of Hormuz, as well as unspecified efforts to stoke unrest inside the Islamic Republic. The White House may also be exploring ways weaken Iranian proxy groups in the region, the officials said.

Tensions between Washington and Tehran have flared since Iran on Thursday shot down the US drone. Iran said the drone violated its airspace — a claim the US denies — near the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

In response to the drone’s destruction, the US was ready to carry out a military strike against Iran but US President Donald Trump said he called it off at the last minute after being told some 150 people could die.

After the drone’s downing, Trump secretly authorized US Cyber Command to carry out a retaliatory cyberattack on Iran, The Washington Post reported Saturday.

The attack crippled computers used to control rocket and missile launches, according to the Post, which cited people familiar with the matter.
Tehran is believed to have stepped up its own cyber capabilities in the face of US efforts to isolate the regime.

Cyberattacks seen as less risky than active warfare

At the conference in Tel Aviv, Rogers, who emphasized he no longer worked for the government and all of his comments were based on what he had learned via the media, said that in the recent US-Iran tensions, both nations were using cyberattacks “as a potential response option that offers lower risk” than active warfare or a military strike.

“That suggests to me that we are going to see more of this,” he said, because a cyberattack has the potential to send a message without provoking more violence. “It is not likely to trigger an escalatory response from the other side,” he said.

A third insight that can be gleaned from the recent US-Iran events is that both nations and companies could face the threat of cyberattacks.

“In the West we have always drawn this line between what is government and what is commercial,” but Iran has not been respecting this distinction, which presents “another interesting challenge” for cybersecurity firms along with potential targets, he said.

Rogers added that cyberattacks are growing globally both in complexity and scale. Technologies such as AI and machine learning are a double-edged sword, offering “great defensive capabilities” but at the same time serving as a handy tool for malicious players. The huge amount of data available today and the convergence of networks makes it harder for both humans and machines to identify all kinds of threats. So, he said, the key is to prioritize the most critical data and processes to be protected, and identify the best possible partners to work with.

The way forward, he said, is to use “more integrated solutions.”

“Doing more of the same and expecting a different response is just not going to work,” he said. “I don’t understand why we are not using more integrated solutions between the government and the private sector,” which should be working together to learn from each other’s experiences.

Unlike the aviation industry, for example, where every incident is analyzed and widely reported, he said, “in cybersecurity we don’t learn from every incident. We need a new model, where the pain of one benefits many. But today, the pain of one is constantly repeated over and over again. ”

Becoming more ‘vulnerable’

At the conference, Yossi Cohen, the head of the Mossad spy agency, said that “cyber-collection” — or gleaning information from the cyber-sphere —  has become “one of the main tools used by intelligence organizations in the war against terror,” and makes it possible for agencies like the Mossad to provide significant warnings to avert immediate threats to lives.

A world in which everything is becoming more and more connected is “redesigning the threat of the nation,” he said. “We are surrounded on all sides by the cyber threat and as a result we are becoming increasingly vulnerable and more exposed to attacks.”

The intersection of the cyber sphere with the physical world “creates vulnerabilities of an unprecedented scale” that are being discovered by malicious players.

To avert this threat, he said, cooperation is needed between governments and companies and societies.

The Mossad was presented by the organizers of Cyber Week with an Award for Achievement in Cyber.

The intelligence agency has set up a technology innovation fund, Libertad, that seeks to invest in technologies in a wide variety of fields, including AI, machine learning, natural language processing and remote personality analysis, to tap into cutting edge developments.

Modeling cybersecurity like human immune system

Michal Braverman-Blumenstyk, chief technology officer, Cloud & AI Security, at Microsoft, said in her talk that a key challenge ahead for cybersecurity firms is to find a balance between security and devices’ usability and privacy, and to ensure that security does not become too costly.

By making objects and devices too secure, she said, you may make them unusable. The same goes for privacy: sometimes more security comes at the cost of privacy. Regarding costs, she said, because not everything can be secured, only the “prime jewels” should be identified and secured.

“We should model our security system like our immune system,” she said. The human immune system is transparent and non-intrusive. “It doesn’t bother you,” she said; nor should cybersecurity systems.

The immune system also has a high detection rate — it identifies infections and averts them in a timely manner, and also has very few false positives — meaning it knows when to send in the the heavy artillery.

“That is the way we should build security systems,” she said.

Cyber Week is a conference attended by some 8,000 people from 80 nations and hosts experts from around the world in the field of cybersecurity and intelligence.

The conference is hosted by the Blavatnik Interdisciplinary Cyber Research Center (ICRC), Yuval Ne’eman Workshop for Science, Technology and Security, Tel Aviv University, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the National Cyber Directorate at the Prime Minister’s Office.

Source Article from https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-iran-tensions-show-cyberattacks-becoming-part-of-warfare-ex-nsa-chief/

Related Posts
The US considers China a strategic adversary. Waging war on the China by other means makes
Well, well, well.  There goes the British Broadcasting Corporation again! BBC’s news story titled “Uncovering
Daniel Hale, an Air Force veteran and former U.S. intelligence analyst turned anti-war activist was
by Finian Cunningham Writer, Dandelion Salad East Africa Crossposted from Sputnik, May 16, 2019 May
The current crisis atmosphere in U.S.-Iranian relations, in which the risk of open warfare appears

Hits: 34

Iran says it will abandon further nuclear deal commitments on July 7

Iran will “resolutely” abandon more commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers on July 7, the semiofficial Fars News Agency reported on Tuesday quoting a “note” from a top security official.

Tehran had announced on May 8 that it was suspending two of its 2015 pledges and gave Europe, China and Russia a two-month ultimatum to help Iran circumvent US sanctions and sell its oil or it would abandon two more commitments.

Last year Washington withdrew from the landmark nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions on Tehran, and Europe’s efforts so far to help Iran economically benefit from the accord have been dismissed by Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as a “bitter joke.”

“As of July 7, Iran will forcefully take the second step of reducing its commitments” to the nuclear deal, Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, was quoted as saying by Fars.

This was so “countries who interpreted Iran’s ‘patience’ with weakness and inaction realize that Iran’s answer to the American drone’s violation of its airspace will be no different than its reaction to devious political efforts to limit Iranian people’s absolute rights,” he added.

Amid escalating tensions last week, Iran shot down a US spy drone it said had crossed into its territory, a claim denied by the United States.

Russia, a key ally of Iran, on Tuesday backed Iran’s version of events.

US President Donald Trump said he ordered retaliatory airstrikes against Iran but pulled back at the last minute.

Shamkhani slammed Europe’s “political insolence” for expecting Iran to continue its commitments without them fulfilling their end of the deal and said it showed a “lack of will” to face the US.

France’s foreign minister said that Iran would be making a “serious mistake” by violating the nuclear deal as a response to pressure from the United States.

“French, German and British diplomacy is completely mobilized to make Iran understand that it would not be in its interest,” Jean-Yves Le Drian told parliament.

In retaliation to what it says is European inaction, Iran has begun to increase its enriched uranium and heavy water stockpile beyond the limits set in the deal.

The second step would involve breaking past the 3.67 percent restriction on enriching uranium and restarting development of a heavy water reactor that was put on hold.

Source Article from https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-says-it-will-abandon-further-nuclear-deal-commitments-on-july-7/

Related Posts
A senior Chinese official and former chairman of the state-owned China National Nuclear Corporation, Wang Shoujun, said
youtube twitter facebook rss Source Article from https://www.globalresearch.ca/dod-doctrine-nuclear-operations-published-taken-offline/5681349
IRNA – Iran’s positive measures in compliance with the nuclear deal is obvious, Matthias Hohn,
Reducing obligations under the 2015 agreement between the world powers and Tehran (known as the
This incisive article by award winning author Manlio Dinucci was first published in May 2019

Hits: 31

Iranians mock Trump, claim he mistook leader for dead predecessor

US President Donald Trump was mocked by Iranians on Tuesday, as some claimed he had mixed up the country’s current supreme leader with his predecessor who died 30 years ago.

“The assets of Ayatollah Khamenei and his office will not be spared by these sanctions,” Trump said Monday as he announced new measures against Iran’s supreme leader and top officials.

But some Iranians said Trump’s pronunciation of the name sounded far closer to “Khomeini.” The Islamic Republic’s founder and revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini died in 1989, and the country has since been led by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“Trump doesn’t know that Ayatollah Khomeini has passed away and that Ayatollah Khamenei is the leader of Iran,” tweeted Sara Masoumi, diplomatic correspondent for the reformist daily Etemad.

“Has this narcissist been waiting for (a dead man) to call him?” wrote another Twitter user, after Trump last month said he would like Iran to phone him.

One social media user suggested “Trump took revenge” for Khamenei reportedly mispronouncing the president’s name as Ronald.

But one Twitter user suggested there was a plot in the White House to make the US president “look like a lunatic!”

The US on Monday imposed sanctions on Khamenei and a string of military chiefs, tightening pressure on the country.

Trump called the move a “strong and proportionate response to Iran’s increasingly provocative actions.”

Trump said it was now up to Tehran to negotiate.

Tensions are running high after Iran shot down a US spy drone last week and Trump considered, then canceled, a retaliatory strike.

Source Article from https://www.timesofisrael.com/iranians-mock-trump-claim-he-mistook-leader-for-dead-predecessor/

Related Posts
With the US doing its level best to raise tensions with Iran, Hunt has revealed
And if it does, why does America not tell the world where Iran’s secret nuclear
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/iran-trump-benshapiro-why-did-trump-defy-the-warmongers-and-decide-not-to-attack-iran-the-duran-streamed-live-on-jun-21-2019/
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/iran-trump-drone-the-duran-live-e39-mixed-signalsthe-duran-streamed-live-on-jun-21-2019contradicting-news-headlines-claim-that-trump-ordered-srikes-against-iran-while-at-the-same-time-calling-o/
After Iran unceremoniously slammed the door on diplomacy, President Trump has decided to tweet his

Hits: 30

‘Our Boys,’ HBO series on Israel’s violent summer of 2014, set for premiere

Joseph Cedar and Hagai Levi’s series “Our Boys,” a 10-part series focusing on the violence that wracked Israel five years ago, premieres August 12 on HBO.

The show is set in the summer of 2014, when Jewish teenagers Gil-ad Shaar, Eyal Yifrach and Naftali Fraenkel were kidnapped on June 12 by Hamas terrorists in the West Bank and killed shortly thereafter.

Two days after their bodies were found, following a search of nearly three weeks, Palestinian teenager Muhammed Abu Khdeir from East Jerusalem was burned alive in a brutal retaliatory killing by Jewish extremists. As a result of the rising tensions, the 2014 Gaza war broke out.

The series was filmed on location in Israel, and was a co-production of cable channel HBO and Israeli production company Keshet International. It was directed by Cedar (known for the Oscar-nominated “Beaufort” and “Footnote”) and created by show runner Hagai Levi (also known for “In Treatment” and “The Affair”) and Tawfik Abu-Yael,

The show follows the investigation by a Shin Bet agent from the internal terror division as he probes the Abu Khdeir murder. The series tells the story of all those involved, Jews and Arabs alike, and of their lives forever changed by these events.

The Jewish teenagers’ abduction sparked a massive search operation and crackdown on Hamas in the West Bank, with hundreds of members of the organization arrested. Tensions ratcheted up further after the teens’ bodies were found outside Hebron at the end of June, and Abu Khdeir was killed by a group Jewish Israelis in an apparent revenge attack, sparking days of unrest throughout the country and in the West Bank and heavy rocket fire from the Gaza Strip at Israel.

On July 8, Israel launched Operation Protective Edge to stymie the rocket fire with airstrikes and later carried out a ground incursion into Gaza to destroy a network of cross-border attack tunnels.

HBO executives said it was important to share the story.

“We’re excited to work with Keshet and this extremely talented and creative group led by Hagai Levi. We look forward to sharing this important story with our subscribers,” said HBO programming chief Casey Bloys.

The limited series will debut with two one-hour back-to-back episodes beginning at 9 p.m. in the US, followed by single episodes on subsequent Mondays. The show will also be available on HBO NOW, HBO GO, HBO On Demand and partners’ streaming platforms.

Source Article from https://www.timesofisrael.com/our-boys-hbo-series-on-israels-violent-summer-of-2014-set-for-premiere/

Related Posts
Surveillance is merely a variant of violent voyeurism, the human behind the camera or visual
by Susan Duclos Something Else They Don't Want You To Know: The Rise of Radical
  A woman has drowned in Lake Geneva when her sightseeing boat sank as a violent
The Facts:The notion that the planet is warming at an alarming rate due to an
Violent, Bigoted Supporters Of Juan Guaidó Attempt To Invade Venezuela’s D.C. Embassy Above Photo: Activists pose

Hits: 41

US consumer confidence hits 21-month low as tariff fears bite

Anxieties jumped among American consumers this month as President Donald Trump’s trade wars dragged on, sending an index of consumer confidence to a 21-month low, survey data showed Tuesday.

Greater shares of the public now say jobs currently are hard to get and expect business conditions in the next six months to worsen, according to the Conference Board.

The unexpected weakening in confidence reversed two months of gains and could weaken retail sales at the end of the second quarter.

The Consumer Confidence Index sank nearly 10 points to a reading of 121.5, its lowest since September of 2017 and well below the result economists had expected.

“The escalation in trade and tariff tensions earlier this month appears to have shaken consumers’ confidence,” Lynn Franco, the board’s senior director for indicators, said in a statement.

“Although the Index remains at a high level, continued uncertainty could result in further volatility in the Index and, at some point, could even begin to diminish consumers’ confidence in the expansion.”

The index for the present situation fell more than eight points to 162.6 its lowest level in a year while expectations fell more than 10 points to 94.1, the lowest level since January.

The share of those saying jobs are now “hard to get” rose 4.6 points to 16.4 percent. Meanwhile, hopes for higher income and stronger job creation sagged.

Those saying they expected business conditions to worsen jumped 4.3 points to 13.1 percent, also the highest level since January.

Late last month, President Donald Trump threatened to impose stinging tariffs on all US imports from Mexico, demanding that Mexican authorities do more to curb migration toward the southwest US border.

He withdrew the threat provisionally early in June but officials are currently preparing to slap tough new duties on $300 billion in Chinese imports, which raise prices on popular consumer items like mobile telephones, laptops and apparel.

Markets are watching a Friday meeting between Trump and China’s Xi Jinping, which could show whether the two sides are likely to resolve their differences after a year of clashes.

Ian Shepherdson of Pantheon Macroeconomics said Tuesday the index was likely to recover from the sudden dip.

“If we’re right, the confidence index will rebound strongly in July, unless the Osaka summit is a disaster and the president imposes tariffs on imported Chinese consumer goods,” he said in a client note.

The index remains high despite the decrease, meaning retail spending should continue to rise, he added.

(Source: AFP)

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/25/599418/US-consumer-confidence-hits-21month-low

Related Posts
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/04/trump-mexico-tariffs-trade-wars-trump-builds-a-tariff-wall-the-duran-published-on-jun-4-2019/
Just hours after President Trump announced he will be imposing 5% tariffs on Mexican imports
When US President Donald Trump re-imposed sanctions on Iran last week, he warned that any
When US President Donald Trump re-imposed sanctions on Iran last week, he warned that any
White House Announces 25 Percent Tariff on Chinese

Hits: 30

Turkey will lose F-35 warplanes if S-400 deal goes ahead: US NATO envoy

The United States Ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Kay Bailey Hutchison, says her country will stop Turkish forces flying and developing F-35 stealth fighter jets in case Turkey presses ahead with its plans to acquire advanced Russian-made S-400 missile defense systems.

“Everything indicates that Russia is going to deliver the system to Turkey and that will have consequences,” she told reporters in the Belgian capital city of Brussels on Tuesday.

Hutchison went on to say that even though Turkey is an important partner in the production of parts of the fuselage, landing gear and cockpit displays for F-35 warplanes, security concerns about Russia are paramount.

“So many of us have tried to dissuade Turkey,” she asserted.

The senior US military official added, “It’s not over until it’s over, but so far Turkey has not appeared to retract from the sale. The consequences will occur, we don’t feel there’s a choice in that.”

Also on Tuesday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Ankara would take delivery of Russian S-400 missile defense systems in July.

“The issue of S-400 is an issue directly related to our sovereignty and we will not backtrack from that,” Erdogan said in a televised speech.

“God willing, the delivery of the S-400 will start next month. In order to meet its security needs, Turkey … does not need to get permission, let alone bow to pressure,” he said.

The remarks came a day after Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said Ankara does not fear US sanctions over S-400 deal.

“No matter what sanctions there may be and which statement comes from the United States, we have already bought the S-400,” Cavusoglu told reporters in Ankara on Monday following a meeting with his Rwandan counterpart Richard Sezibera.

“Now we are talking about when the S-400 will be delivered to Turkey. It is not possible for us to give up on the purchase of the S-400,” he added.

Citing three unnamed people familiar with the matter, English-language Bloomberg television news network, reported on June 19 that US President Donald Trump’s administration is weighing three packages of sanctions against Turkey over S-400 purchase.

The sources underlined that the most severe package under discussion between officials at the National Security Council and the State and Treasury departments would all but cripple Turkey’s troubled economy, and would be in addition to Ankara’s exclusion from the F-35 fighter jet program.

The sanctions proposal with the most support would target several companies in Turkey’s key defense sector under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).

The US Congress passed the CAATSA against Russia in August 2017 over allegations of interfering in the 2016 presidential election. The law, among other things, imposes sanctions on countries and companies that engage in contracts to purchase weaponry from Russia.

Moscow and Ankara finalized an agreement on the delivery of the S-400 in December 2017.

Back in April 2018, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin said in Ankara that they had agreed to expedite the delivery of the S-400. At the time, it was said that the delivery could be made between late 2019 and early 2020.

A number of NATO member states have criticized Turkey for purchase of the S-400, arguing the missile batteries are not compatible with those of the military alliance.

They also argue that the purchase could jeopardize Ankara’s acquisition of F-35 fighter jets and possibly result in US sanctions.

The S-400 is an advanced Russian missile system designed to detect, track, and destroy planes, drones, or missiles as far as 402 kilometers away. It has previously been sold only to China and India.

Ankara is striving to boost its air defense, particularly after Washington decided in 2015 to withdraw its Patriot surface-to-air missile system from Turkish border with Syria, a move that weakened Turkey’s air defense.

Before gravitating towards Russia, the Turkish military reportedly walked out of a $3.4-billion contract for a similar Chinese system. The withdrawal took place under purported pressure from Washington.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/25/599412/Turkey-will-lose-F35-warplane-if-S400-deal-goes-ahead-US-NATO-envoy

Related Posts
According to officials familiar with the situation, the announcement that the US is
FNA – The Syrian and Russian fighter jets carried out a fresh round of heavy
Local Editor 24-05-2018 | 09:31 Source Article from https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2018/05/24/us-warplanes-strike-syrian-army-bases-in-deir-ez-zor/
(ANTIWAR.COM) — Saudi warplanes carried out an attack against the Yemeni capital city of
The report, first cited by the German magazine Spiegel, says the Panavia Tornado, which first

Hits: 57

Annual defense show displays Russian military power

Russian military power was on display in the Moscow region on Tuesday (June 25) at this year’s Army Forum, an annual event.

“I want to mark, that despite economic sanctions, which were imposed to slow down the development of science and technology in Russia, the defense industry enterprises not only stood firmly but are also increasing positive dynamics. I am sure that the forum will assure our guests and partners of that,” Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said.

The convention showcases the latest advancements across the military industry from Russia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, India, Kazakhstan, China, Pakistan, Thailand, Turkey, and South Africa.

The Army 2019 expo will host military shows and conferences until June 30.

(Source: Reuters)

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/25/599410/Russia-defense-show-Shoigu

Related Posts
At the very moment a Russian warship has docked in Cuba — a mere one hundred miles
Marian Radzajewski was found guilty and sentenced to 14 years in a “strict regime colony,”
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty will expire in six months after the US announced
The cat named Redhead was found over a year ago in Russia’s Novosibirsk, suffering from
President Putin’s opening speech was read aloud by Russian Security Council chief Nikolai Patrushev, which explained

Hits: 29

Foreign investment in Iran more than doubled in a year: Minister

Iran’s minister of economy and finance says that the country has managed to record more than a double increase in foreign direct investment (FDI) over the past year.

Farhad Dejpassand said on Tuesday that Iran’s FDI had reached to above $3.5 billion in May 2019 from a “worrying rate” of around $1.7 billion a year ago.

Dejpassand said the country was eyeing to meet higher FDA targets at the end of the current Iranian calendar year in March, specially with a scheme to facilitate investments above $250 million.

He said Iran managed to collect around 1,090 trillion rials (more than $8 billion) worth of taxes in the 12-month period ending in March 2019, adding that the figure was around 10 percent higher than the government projections.


Fully prepared to counter sanctions

Dejpassand also said Iran is fully prepared to defuse US economic pressure a day after Washington imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran.

The minister said that Tehran had a range of options to counter US sanctions although he would not elaborate on the specifics.

“In current circumstances we have a full armory to counter enemy’s efforts but unfortunately we can’t announce the adopted measures in public,” said Dejpassand while speaking to a group of journalists in Tehran.

The Iranian minister said US sanctions on Iran’s oil industry had caused the country to accelerate its efforts and policies aimed at cutting to zero the dependency of its operating budget to oil incomes.

“We have adopted measures in terms of budget and income to minimize the tension being felt by the country,” said Dejpassand.

“We have adopted solutions to resort to clean and robust form of income during the time of decreased oil revenues so that we can realize the old dream of oil-independent budget,” he added.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/25/599409/Iran-economy-foreign-investment-sanctions-Dejpassand

Related Posts
MNA – Iranian Deputy Defense Minister Brigadier General Taghizadeh left Tehran for Moscow on Tuesday
Israel and the US are setting up a joint R&D center to focus on technologies
Last week, the news broke in Israeli media that Israel’s Ministry of Strategic Affairs (MSA)
Former Oasis front-man Liam Gallagher is arguing his case to replace Theresa May as the
Iran’s minister of science, research, and technology hails that nationwide academic endeavor has awarded

Hits: 29

Palestinians launch general strike in Gaza Strip in protest at US-led Bahrain conference

Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip have launched a general strike in rejection of the US-led conference in Bahrain, which would seek to advance the economic aspects of President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal for “peace” between the Israeli regime and Palestinians, dubbed “the deal of the century.”

On Tuesday, people stopped going to their workplaces and closed businesses. Public transportation also came to a halt, and most of the public and private institutions, including universities, banks and courts, were shut for the day.

The High Follow-Up Committee of the National and Islamic Forces had called for the action, urging citizens to raise black flags over homes and in their areas.

The Committee said it would hold a national conference at Rashad Shawa Cultural Center in Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City on Tuesday at the same time as the Manama economic workshop is underway.

Another popular conference is scheduled to be held in the eastern flank of the Gaza Strip on Wednesday.

A massive popular march will also take place on the same day from the western gate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) headquarters to the UN office in Gaza.

Elsewhere in the southern West Bank city of al-Khalil (Hebron), located 30 kilometers (19 miles) south of Jerusalem al-Quds, clashes broke out between a group of Palestinians and Israeli troops.

Israeli security forces surround Palestinian demonstrators, during a protest against the US-sponsored Middle East economic conference that opens today in Bahrain, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Bethlehem on June 25, 2019. (Photo by AFP)

Palestine’s official WAFA news agency reported that the skirmishes erupted in the Bab a-Zawiya neighborhood of the city, and Israeli military forces fired rubber-coated steel bullets, teargas canisters and stun grenades to disperse the crowd. Tens of the protesters suffered respiratory problems due to inhalation of tear gas. They were treated on the ground.

Rudeineh: Arab Peace Initiative red line that could not be redrafted

Meanwhile, Palestinian Presidential spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeineh has stressed that the Arab Peace Initiative is a redline, which neither Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner nor anyone else could redraft.

Palestinian Presidential spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeineh (file photo)

Abu Rudeineh’s remarks came in response to Kushner’s earlier comments that the so-called deal of the century will not follow the lines of the Arab Peace Initiative.

The Arab Peace Initiative, proposed by Saudi Arabia in 2002, calls on Israel to agree to a two-state solution along the 1967 lines and a “just” solution to the Palestinian refugee issue. The initiative has been repeatedly endorsed by the Arab League in 2002, 2007, and 2017.

The senior Palestinian official further noted that peace will not be achieved at any cost and that President Mahmoud Abbas has already exposed the real intentions of the US-touted Mideast plan.

“The Manama workshop is designed to pave the way for the creation and expansion of an emirate in Gaza, separation of Gaza from the West Bank, and the Judaization of al-Quds (Jerusalem),” he said, emphasizing that any plan that disregards the Palestinian legitimacy is doomed to failure.

Abu Rudeineh went on to say that any unilateral actions aimed at bypassing Arab and international legitimacy will reach an impasse, and that Palestine has not nominated anyone to negotiate on its behalf.

The so-called “Peace to Prosperity” workshop opened in Bahrain on June 25 and will run through June 26.

The Palestinian leadership is boycotting the meeting, leading critics to question the credibility of the event.

The Palestinian Bar Association (PBA) plans to file a lawsuit against participants in the US-led conference in Manama.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/25/599408/Palestinians-launch-general-strike-in-Gaza-Strip-in-protest-at-USled-Bahrain-conference

Related Posts
Imagine taking your two-month-old daughter in for her scheduled vaccines. Imagine watching as she
With mounting social and political restrictions under Hamas rule, musicians are struggling to
‘Toyota Cow-rolla’: Indian woman plasters her car with bovine DUNG to cool it down (PHOTOS)
IMAGE: Britain’s Ambassador to the UN, Karen Pierce, left in the lurch by near unanimous
Scores of police in Jerusalem backed up by officers on horseback trying to break up

Hits: 33

The unwritten history of Israel’s alliance with the Shah’s dictatorship

For years, Israel maintained close political, economic, and security relations with the Shah of Iran. Newly-declassified documents reveal that Israeli leaders were well aware of his murderous suppression of political opponents.

By Eitay Mack

Shah Mohammad Reza with his consort and crown prince after the coronation, 1967.

Shah Mohammad Reza with his consort and crown prince after the coronation, 1967.

2019 year marks the 40th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, during which the Ayatollahs took control of the country and brought down the Shah’s absolutist monarchy. The Iranian masses, who were undergoing various ideological changes at the time, overthrew the Shah’s corrupt and oppressive regime.

Much has been written over the years about Israel’s ties with Mohammad Reza Shah and his dictatorship, and when it was convenient for the IDF censor and political and security officials in Israel, information — and even secret documents from that period — were also revealed to the general public.

Recently, files from the Foreign Ministry regarding relations with Iran have been opened and can now be found in Israel’s State Archives. These include more than 10,000 pages from 1953 until 1979, which were heavily censored when compared to similar files in cases of other countries.

The documents expose Israel’s extensive and exceptional relations with a foreign country, not only because these political and security-based relations were with with a Muslim country, but because the relationship with the Shah’s dictatorship was strategic and central to the State of Israel from a security, economic and political point of view. At the time, Israel’s relations with many other countries were limited mainly to weapons sales in exchange for votes in international forums.

Thus, for example, Israel purchased a significant portion — and in some years all — of its oil from the Shah’s regime, while Iran used Israel as a middleman to sell its oil to third countries. The alliance over oil required that Israel and the Shah ensure the safety of shipping routes. This strengthened their partnership in the struggle against Egypt’s Gamel Abdel Nasser’s repeated attempts to promote ideological and military alliances throughout the Middle East that were hostile to Iran and Israel, particularly in the Gulf states and the Arabian Peninsula.

Private and state-owned Israeli companies, ranging from textiles, agriculture, electrical appliances, water, fertilizers, construction, aviation, shipping, gas, tires and even dentures, had been operating extensively in Iran. In some years, Iran was one of the main destinations for Israeli exports. Meanwhile, Israeli academia also enjoyed relatively extensive cooperation with academics in Iran.

The Shah never officially recognized Israel

Iran de facto recognized the State of Israel in March 1950, but in light of internal pressure by those who opposed Israel and the Shah’s pro-Western and pro-American policies — as well as external pressure by Arab states — Iran avoided officially recognizing Israel.

The Shah did have “secret” representation in Tel Aviv beginning in 1961, and Israel had permanent representation in Tehran, which at one point became an embassy that included military attachés. Due to the sensitive nature of the agreement, Israeli representatives in Iran generally refrained from conducting relations with the Shah regime through bureaucrats in the Foreign Ministry and other government ministries. Instead, it carried out its business through a narrow circle of Shah loyalists and politicians, as well as the top echelons of Iran’s defense establishment. Sometimes those relations were conducted directly with the Shah himself and his Royal Court minister.

President Chaim Weizmann (left) receives members of the diplomatic corps, including from Iran, on Independence Day, April 23, 1950. (David Eldan/GPO)

President Chaim Weizmann (left) receives members of the diplomatic corps, including from Iran, on Independence Day, April 23, 1950. (David Eldan/GPO)

Over the years, Israel attempted to hide its involvement in the security apparatuses and the suppression meted out by the Shah, yet the Iranian public was well aware of Israel’s aid to the regime. In particular was Israel’s close ties with the Shah’s security service, SAVAK, which was responsible for the political persecution, torture and murder of the monarch’s political opponents.

Given the breadth of relations between the two countries, I will focus on documents relating to Israeli assistance to the security apparatuses and the suppression by the Shah’s dictatorship, which would eventually lead to his downfall. These documents attest to the depth of Israeli involvement in the regime, Israel’s strategic importance to this relationship, and the fear of the consequences of the Shah’s fall — a concern that became palpable in the years before the end of his rule.

Stability through oppression

Israeli awareness of the Shah’s oppressive policies is evident from a telegram sent on April 22, 1955 by the Israeli embassy in London. The telegram describes an Iranian diplomat who tells his Israeli interlocutor that the Iranian government is banning communism everywhere, and that the Americans are satisfied with these actions.

Eight years later, on September 9, 1963, Director of the Middle East Department at Israel’s Foreign Ministry Nathaniel Lorch wrote that the traditional religious processions that took place that month had turned into mass demonstrations against the Shah’s regime, and that the government “was surprised by the use of religious demonstrations for political protest. The riots spread to a number of towns. The government used great force to suppress the riots and officially announced that 86 were killed and 193 were wounded. The last few days passed quietly. The regime controls the situation in both Tehran and its provinces.”

Lorch claimed that “the anti-Israel chants by the demonstrators made up a small part of all the slogans, and in the meantime the anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli tone has completely disappeared.” Lorch further noted that “any attempt to present Israeli-Persian relations as a cause for events should be thwarted.”

According to a January 3, 1964 report prepared by Dr. Zvi Doriel, the head of the Israeli delegation in Tehran: “The internal stability and exclusive reign of the Shah achieved by the suppression of religious and other opponents of the regime in June, as well as by what the regime views as a successful election season, continues without significant disturbance. The process of the disintegration of the National Front [the nationalist coalition that opposed the Shah — E.M.] continues.”

Shah Mohammad Reza seen during a visit to the White House along with Jordan's King Hussein and U.S. President Jimmy Carter, 1976.

Shah Mohammad Reza seen during a visit to the White House along with Jordan’s King Hussein and U.S. President Jimmy Carter, December 31, 1977.

The Shah, according to Israeli reports, also leaned heavily on the ruling Iran Novin Party while fostering a semblance of opposition. According to a November 25, 1964 survey by Israel Haviv of the Middle East Department of the Foreign Ministry, instead of maintaining a one-state system ruled by Iran Novin, the Shah supported the continued existence of the People’s Party as a fictitious opposition party that would imbue parliamentary life in Iran with a more democratic character.

The Iranians can ‘stifle any resistance movement’

In a meeting on December 19, 1964 between Foreign Minister Abba Eban and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aram, the latter praised the relations between Israel and Iran and said that there was no other country with which Iran’s relations were so close. Meanwhile, the Iranians preferred to keep the relationship quiet. Meir Ezri, an Israeli representative in Tehran, reported in a missive sent on May 5, 1965 about a meeting he held with the foreign minister, in which Aram complained about the public nature of Israel’s activities in the country, saying it may harm Iran’s relations with Arab countries.

Ezri replied to the minister, saying that “Israel’s general interest in the Middle East is the existence of a sovereign and prosperous Iran headed by the Shah, who is considered a friend of Israel… We do not believe that the Arabs will ever be friends with Iran despite all Iranian efforts. Our friendship obliges us to bring to Iran’s attention what we know about the Arab efforts aimed at the most vital Iranian interests.”

Israel, as noted, was aware of the murderous suppression of the Iranian opposition. David Turgeman, who was part of the Israeli mission in Iran, reported on January 27, 1966 that the leaders of the communist Tudeh Party had been sentenced to death in absentia, part of a larger trend of putting opposition members on trial. A few months later on July 21, Turgeman reported that the Shah and the top echelons of the government were confident and that “there is no internal danger posed by left-wing oppositionists, and that security forces can stifle any resistance or underground movement.”

Turgeman had no doubt about the nature of the regime. In a March 8, 1967 survey he wrote, in conjunction with the Shah’s family protection reforms, that “we must admit that the new law is a classic example of the benefits of a regime of enlightened absolutism.”

The IDF attaché is the ‘hero of the day’

This did not prevent Israel from seeing Iran as a matter of substance. In a survey prepared on February 23, 1966, Director of the Foreign Ministry’s Middle East Department Mordechai Gazit wrote that “in some respects it was said that Iran-Israel relations are a kind of unwritten secret alliance that gives Israel a range of advantages in the fields of the economy, security, the Middle East and anti-Nasserism.”

Gazit added that Israel is engaged in “the renovation of Iranian Air Force planes and civil aviation aircrafts with full and large compensation… Israeli experts were employed in the anti-Nasser Persian propaganda… very close intelligence cooperation through taking full advantage of the Iranian territory… Close cooperation between the IDF and the Iranian army… The attachés are in daily contact with the Iranian general staff, and this is, in fact, without unnecessary modesty… An Iranian purchase from IMI Systems, in addition to the “Uzi” deals and the other acquisitions are in advanced stages of discussion.”

An Iranian representative undergoes training at Beit Berl College, Kfar Saba. (Fritz Cohen/GPO)

An Iranian representative undergoes training at Beit Berl College, Kfar Saba. (Fritz Cohen/GPO)

The published documents do not detail the content of the partnership between Israel and the notoriously despised SAVAK. However, the documents do include a breakdown of military cooperation. For example, according to a telegram from January 4, 1967, the Iranian prime minister asked the Israeli military attaché in Tehran, Colonel Ya’akov Nimrodi, to coordinate the training of the head of his bodyguards. In a conversation held a month later with Meir Ezri, the Israeli representative in Tehran, the prime minister told Ezri that “he instructed the commander of the gendarmerie to purchase an Uzi submachine gun and approved the necessary budget for doing so in accordance with the request of the IDF attaché in Tehran.”

Two months later, on April 13, then-Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin spoke with the Shah, who was interested in Israeli planes and tanks, and was “knowledgeable about what was going on and particularly on the security/military level” when it came to Israeli-Iranian cooperation.

A review by Israeli Ambassador in Tehran, Dr. Zvi Dorel, on August 29, 1967, read as follows: “We have established a close, friendly, and practical partnership between the IDF and the security services and their Iranian counterparts, with joint execution of programs and missions of national importance, with continuous mutual visits by the heads of the armed forces and their senior officials.”

“Various security problems vital to Israel have been solved in close cooperation with the Iranians,” Dorel continued. “The military attaché is recognized by the general staff and the Iranian Foreign Ministry, it maintains extensive relations with the Iranian army and deals with an impressive list of issues of national importance and enjoys special fondness by the Iranian military circles… They conducted advanced negotiations regarding the purchase of Israeli-made products and BEDEC programs to the tune of millions of dollars… Israeli chiefs of staff and the head of the security services have met with the Shah several times… the Iranian army views the IDF and the security services as allies and those involved in making contact and professional issues… Colonel Nimrodi, an IDF attaché, was a hero today among the army circles.”

The Shah in Israeli gossip columns

According to a telegram dated December 27, 1967 (it is unclear who sent it): “Prominent Israeli presence was accepted by the Iranian public as a fact that cannot be annulled… Iran views the ‘revolutionary’ Arab regimes not only as the source of extreme Arab nationalism but also as a threat to the royal regime. This is convenient and encouraging not only in the intimate relations between our security services and those of Iran, but also in the diplomatic realm in Western capitals, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom, and even in coordination and cooperation in the Middle East (vis-à-vis the Kurds and Yemen).”

Nevertheless, despite the close relations, the Shah’s regime did not particularly like these relations — or criticism of the regime — to be publicized. The Shah’s inner circle repeatedly objected to Israeli media reports about both the relationship between the two countries as well the hedonism of the royal family. For example, in August 1967 the Iranian Foreign Ministry protested a gossip article published in LaIsha, an Israeli lifestyle magazine for women, about the Shah’s family, even though the Israeli representative in Tehran explained that it was “a magazine of no importance that is mainly read by teenage girls.”

According to a telegram sent by Y. Margolin on September 13, 1967, the Foreign Ministry examined the possibility of appealing to the Attorney General to initiate criminal proceedings against LaIsha and to require any gossip published about the Shah’s family to first be approved by the IDF censor.

According to a telegram sent in August 1972 by Ambassador Ezri to the director general of the Ministry of Defense, the negotiations over the purchase of Israeli tanker aircrafts by the Shah’s dictatorship were progressing. A report prepared by the Foreign Ministry on Israel’s defense exports to the dictatorship on October 29 of that year reveals that between 1968 and 1972, IMI Systems sold $20.9 million worth of equipment to Iran; Israel Aerospace Industries sold $1.3 million; Soltam sold $16.9 million in mortars; Motorola sold $12 million; Tadiran sold $11.3 million and set up a radio equipment factory in Iran; and Israel’s Defense Ministry sold $700,000 worth of equipment.

A united front against communism

A letter dated June 28, 1973 by the Finance Ministry’s deputy supervisor of foreign exchange to the deputy director general of the International Defense Cooperation Directorate of the Israel Ministry of Defense stated that “Recently, Israeli officials have increased their activity in Iran, including: production units of the IDF and our Ministry of Defense, the Air Industry, Tadiran, Motorola, and others who are trying to sell their services and products to the Iranian army, the Iranian Ministry of Defense and similar government agencies.”

“The spectrum of activity is broad, ranging from the supply of military products and electronics manufactured by factories in Israel, to the export of systems for creating and assembling them on the spot, training, surveys, construction, assembling and maintenance of facilities on the ground through contractors. From what has been brought to our attention, we see that the activities of various Israeli bodies are similar and perhaps even overlapping,” the deputy supervisor wrote.

Iranian police received training in operating communications equipment at Motorola in Israel, but according to a telegram sent on July 2, 1975 by A. Levin from the Israeli mission in Tehran to the Foreign Ministry’s Agency for International Development Cooperation, the Iranians requested to “receive full training in Israeli police facilities.” Levin recommended that the request be accepted and eventually informed the Foreign Ministry that “Israel Police agrees to accept under its auspices and responsibility the course for Iranian liaison officers,” and that the theoretical part of the course will include “tours to police facilities.”

Armed left-wing protesters seen during demonstrations against the Shah's regime. behind of them is written: 'Long live anti-Imperialism and democratic forces,' January 1, 1979.

Armed left-wing protesters seen during demonstrations against the Shah’s regime. behind of them is written: ‘Long live anti-Imperialism and democratic forces,’ January 1, 1979.

These relations existed at the highest level. Prime Minister Golda Meir met with the Shah in 1972, and in a May 19 report she said that the Shah “thinks that the relations and cooperation between countries that stand against communism should be strengthened: Persia, Israel, Turkey and Ethiopia.” Two years later, when Meir resigned and Yitzhak Rabin took over, the new Israeli prime minister also visited Iran. According to a telegram from December 8, 1974, Rabin met with the head of the Iranian security services.

The beginning of the end

It was during those years that Israel began to believe that the regime was unstable. In a report prepared by the Foreign Ministry on September 11, 1972, shortly after Meir’s visit to Tehran, it was noted that “social unrest is manifest among students and intellectuals, and the stability of the regime is maintained through policing.” Four years later, in June 1976, Israel already understood that the Shah was in trouble.

A telegram sent at the time by Israeli Ambassador Uri Lubrani stated that the Shah’s liberalization policy, which included the assumption of powers from SAVAK, led to “the opportunistic elements that until recently had been underground or dormant to take advantage of this and begin expressing their opposition to the regime.” This forced the Shah to return some of SAVAK’s authority in an effort to control the situation.

Ambassador Lubrani added that “the feeling of many in Iran today is that the status of the Shah has begun to be quickly undermined, a process that cannot be reversed and will eventually lead to his defeat and a drastic change in the form of government in Iran. It is very difficult to give a time estimate and my personal assessment, which is not based on any objective data, is that this will take place more or less in the next five years. There is no answer to the question of who or what will replace the current regime. It is reasonable to assume that the monarchy will end and that, at least in the first stage, the military officers will take its place. The big question is who will lead them and what direction he will take.”

A pro-Shah demonstration in Tabriz, Iran, 1978.

A pro-Shah demonstration in Tabriz, Iran, April 8, 1978.

As for the consequences for the State of Israel, Ambassador Lubrani wrote that “the implications of a new situation for Israel-Iran relations should the Shah’s rule be undermined are grave, and the current regime of the Shah will be seen as the most positive one for Israel in Iran. Any change in this government will, to the best of our assessment, be to the detriment of our relations with this country.”

Lubrani also that Israel had extensive activities in Iran at the time, including “relationships surrounding the oil supply from Iran (both to supply itself and the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline), and oil sales such as security-related projects,” and that “the security arrangements that were recently signed create an Israeli commitment to Iran vis-a-vis sensitive areas, as well as Iranian financial commitments that are significant for our national economy.”

As time went on, Israel became increasingly concerned about the fate of the regime. Two years later, on August 14, 1978, Lubrani sent a telegram to the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem in which he painted a bleak picture of the Shah’s future. The ambassador met with Deputy Police Chief Ja’afri, who told Lubrani that “in the short term he does not anticipate difficulties in maintaining law and order and believes that the military regime is capable of dealing with any attempt at rebellion. On the other hand, he believes that this situation cannot continue indefinitely and that if the government does not take far-reaching measure to change the system of governance and its priorities, the existing regime will collapse.”

Ja’afri believed that the Shah was unaware of his true situation. He also criticized the head of SAVAK for “not introducing changes into the system that the people themselves have hated for years.” Ja’afri claimed that the regime made a mistake when it used the army and “caused many casualties,” while noting “the special relations we had with him and promised to help if necessary.”

The last hope

A month and a half later, on September 28, Lubrani reported to the Foreign Ministry that he had met with the Shah in light of the huge demonstrations that sought to oust his regime, during which Shah reiterated his claims that the communists were responsible for the demonstrations. When the Shah asked Lubrani about the identity of his interlocutor, Lubrani answered that “on political matters I have always acted, if not in tandem the head of SAVAK, then through the Royal Court minister or Tufanian (Deputy Minister of Defense – E.M.).”

Lubrani summarized the meeting: “I have a difficult impression of the man. He is not the man we were familiar with, he was distant and sometimes stares. There is no doubt that the man has gone through a nightmare from which he has yet to fully recover. He is full of terror and uncertain of the future. The most worrisome aspect is the sense that he seems to have made peace with his fate, without having found any strong desire to take matters into his own hands and change it. I will add that it is possible that I found the Shah in a temporary moment of gloom.”

Protests by anti-Shah demonstrators in Tehran's Jaleh Square, September 7, 1978. The following day, Iranian security forces would open fire on protesters, killing over 80 of them.

Anti-Shah demonstrators protest in Tehran’s Jaleh Square, September 7, 1978. The following day, Iranian security forces would open fire, killing over 80 protesters in what would come to be known as ‘Black Friday.’

Israel did not want to lose its stronghold in Iran under any circumstance. If the Shah was to be deposed, Israel hoped that a military regime would take his place. In a telegram from December 30, 1978, Director of the Middle East Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yael Vered writes that the best option for the State of Israel is “extreme toughness by the army and the establishment of a military regime and a real military government. Whether initiated by the army in the form of a military coup or with the Shah through tacit consent on his part.”

On January 4, 1979, in a last-ditch attempt to bring calm to the streets of the country, the Shah appointed Shapour Bakhtiar as prime minister. Israel, however, had no illusions about his ability to govern. Four days later, Vered sent a telegram to Israeli missions around the world saying that Bakhtiar’s government had no public support and was in danger of collapsing.

Vered wrote that the Shah and Bakhtiar had reached an understanding about the Shah going on “holiday leave,” but “the length of time and who will decide on his return remains a question and may lead to crises in the future. The Shah continues to symbolize the unity of Iran, and the loyalty of the army to him, even today and despite the number of cracks, is undoubted.”

Vered estimated that if Khomeini and his supporters took power, relations with Israel would come to an end. Yet she maintained hope that the army would take over and that Iran would see “another form of government like the current one or a more convenient army, and it is likely that the presence (of Israel – E.M.) will initially continue under a lower profile.” Vered’s hopes did not come to fruition, and on January 16 the Shah fled Iran.

Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran after 14 years of exile on February 1, 1979. (sajed.ir/BY-SA 3.0)

Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran after 14 years of exile on February 1, 1979. (sajed.ir/BY-SA 3.0)

On February 11, about a week after Khomeini returned from exile to Iran, the Israeli government decided to evacuate its remaining representatives in Tehran, especially Ambassador Yossef Harmelin, while at the same time examining the possibility of leaving an Israeli representative so as to not completely sever ties with the new regime. “The foreign minister instructed the director-general, after the Mossad announced the evacuation of our people, to examine the possibility of leaving a person in a diplomatic appointment so as not to cut the wire,” the cable said. “There will be no official announcement of leaving. If Harmelin leaves – he will be in danger should he be imprisoned, due to the fact that he was the former head of the Shin Bet.”

‘The masses can bring down a regime with tanks’

Yet Israel still held out hope for the new regime. Three days later, Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan met with the Japanese ambassador to Israel. A report sent to the Israeli embassy in Tokyo shows Dayan told the diplomat that “the current stage (in Iran – E.M.) is not final and is a transition into a new period. There is concern that the influence of extreme leftists will grow, and that in addition to the religious sea change, xenophobia will also spread.”

Yet, according to Dayan, Iran will still need foreigners to operate its sophisticated weaponry, especially after the Americans had left. Minister Dayan further expressed his concern for the fate of the Jewish community in Iran, arguing that “one must worry about the influence of the events in Iran on other countries in the area, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Sudan, and Morocco, who also do not respect civil rights.”

On the same day, Dayan spoke with U.S. Secretary of Defense Harold Brown, who according to the protocol told the Israeli minister that “the United States does not feel guilt about what happened to the Shah, since the Shah failed to develop a managerial class below him that would shoulder some of the responsibility, and if everything in his country was in his hands, then his mistakes were his alone. There was also the problem of corruption. The revolution in Iran has reached the masses. There is a strong sense of nationalism. One can hope that the Iranians will understand the main factors in their national interest and act accordingly.”

But beyond concerns about the loss of an Israeli “outpost” in Iran, Israel had other no less serious concerns: the fear that the masses in the Middle East would imitate the Iranians and overthrow their own regimes. According to the minutes of a meeting of deputy directors-general held on the same day Dayan spoke with Brown, Pinchas Eliav, director of political research at the Foreign Ministry, said that the serious issue is that “the social-economic-public character of the upheaval proved that the street and the masses could bring down a regime with tanks, the most modern weaponry, and an air force.”

“All these forces stood before a street that is nevertheless a street (perhaps Khomeini had some agents and some communist intervention), incitement, and ideology, and the masses succeeded in overthrowing the regime. This is, in my opinion, a harbinger of danger to all the regimes in the region, including the radical ones.”

Neither Israel nor the United States have never taken responsibility for their continued support of the dictatorship and their support for the Shah in crushing the left and the progressive elements in Iran. Their conduct was instrumental in the establishment of the dictatorship of the Ayatollahs.

Eitay Mack is an Israeli human rights lawyer working to stop Israeli military aid to regimes that commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Source Article from https://972mag.com/israel-shah-iran-dictatorship/142040/

Related Posts
November 4th, 2018 By Lorna Bevan Guest writer for Wake Up World Claiming Your Unwritten Potential: Jupiter
April 26, 2016 photo of Congressman Joe Sestak, center, his wife Susan Sestak, left, and
Calls for the annexation of the Occupied West Bank are gaining momentum in both Tel
The iconic golden dome of the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa mosque, located on
When Israeli prime ministers are in trouble, facing difficult elections or a corruption scandal, the

Hits: 23

A resurrection followed by a crucifixion: The story of Diego Armando Maradona

The bargain-basement recruitment of the wayward Barcelona vagabond by troubled Napoli, perpetually battling relegation from Italy’s Serie A, was the greatest piece of transfer business in football history, but only for the club not for Maradona.

What followed was a resurrection – the club rose and rose to domestic and international championships – and then a Via Dolorosa ending in the crucifixion of the troubled troubadour.

All told by Kapadia through masterful editing of hundreds of hours of footage and sparse commentary. Maradona never appears on screen except in archive, even his few words spoken almost indecipherably as befitting the complete physical and psychological wreck he has become.

But no archive could more beautifully showcase the almost superhuman majesty of Maradona.

Also on rt.com
Whether it’s fair or not, Messi is forever stuck in Maradona’s shadow

I saw him as a teenager at Hampden Park, Glasgow in 1979 where as a substitute he came out to warm-up at half time. He certainly warmed us up. He played ‘keepy-uppies’ with the ball in the middle of the park literally hundreds of times without the ball touching the ground. When he came on in the second half no one was in any doubt that a star was born.

The veteran Liverpool and Scotland defender Alan Hansen, tasked with keeping tabs on him, described afterwards the state of his own “twisted legs” by the end of the game and how he couldn’t sleep that night without the light on so total had been the humiliation.

Kapadia shows in the archive the sewer from which the young Maradona emerged. Except there were no sewers or roads or pavements in the wooden shack shanty in which the large Maradona family grew up on the outskirts of Buenos Aires. No world-famous multi-millionaire in history can have been born and raised in such squalor.

Many were surprised in later life when Maradona was often seen with the likes of Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro. If they’d known of his origin there would’ve been no surprise at all.

The world at large soon saw what I saw at Hampden Park and before long he was on his way to the mighty Barcelona. But he never left the slums truly behind, with all the insecurities, the scars, the fears.

Barcelona and the big-time didn’t work out for Maradona, he spent too much time and energy on wine, women and song. In a way, Napoli offered redemption and the only way was up, professionally. The team could only get better.

You could say that Naples and Maradona were a match made in heaven. Decayed grandeur boundless enthusiasm reviled by the establishment. For the northern Italian kings of Italian football “Africa began at Rome” in which case Naples was darkest Africa. The fans in the north sang songs about Napoli carrying cholera, having no work, being beggars. All the epithets Maradona knew well in Argentina about he and his kind.

Also on rt.com
‘I’m not dying’: Argentina icon Maradona denies Alzheimer’s rumors

As the Argentine drove Napoli to greater and greater success, beating them regularly, winning their first ever championships and cups he grew to be as hated in the rest of Italy as he was loved, in fact revered, by the Neapolitans, Religious imagery of Maradona multiplied, he was on his way to becoming a God. But his feet of clay were soon able to be glimpsed.

Wine turned not into water but into cocaine. Dancing partners soon became prostitutes. Drinking partners soon became the killers and extortioners of the Camorra – the Naples mafia. Soon he was in their vice-like grip. And hopelessly addicted to the adulation but more to the narcotics.

The end when it comes is truly tragic, almost unbearably so. This bundle of effervescent genius becomes a grotesque parody of himself. The “hand of God” he once wielded at such cost to England was replaced by the deadly grasp of the devil. As a morality tale Asif Kapadia’s Maradona the film simply could not be bettered. Shakespeare himself could not have written it.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462648-diego-maradona-football-napoli/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
    The ‘Peacemaking’ POTUS Morphs Into a Warmongering Psychopath The Millennium Report President Trump
(Natural News) Police recently arrested a Baptist pastor in Spokane, Wash., and
June 20th, 2019 By Dr. Joseph Mercola Contributing writer for Wake Up World Originally published at mercola.com
When America Had An Open Prison – The Story Of Kenyon Scudder And His ‘Prison
President Trump has hurled the dire charge of "Treason" at the New York Times for

Hits: 19

Cost of potential US war with Iran? $250 oil & another Afghanistan

Right after the Global Hawk UAV was shot down, the New York Times reported that US President Donald Trump approved military strikes against Iran, but then changed his mind.

Let’s start by saying that the decision to launch a military operation against Iran (which is what this is really about), including the specific time and place, would have to be taken by a very small group of top US political and military officials. At such meetings, no leaks could possibly occur by definition.

Now, let’s take a look at some of the details. The difference between a ‘strike’ and an ‘operation’ is quite significant, at the very least in terms of duration, and forces and equipment involved. It would be nice to know if the NYT actually meant a single airstrike or an entire air operation.

Also on rt.com
US lapdog Jeremy Hunt prepping British public for war with Iran, just in case Trump asks

Amusingly enough, the publication reported that the strikes were scheduled for early morning to minimize the potential death toll among the Iranian military and civilians. It’s worth pointing out that the US has never cared about the number of victims either among the military personnel or the civilian population of its adversaries.

Moreover, the purpose of any military conflict is to do as much damage to your enemy as possible in terms of personnel, military hardware and other equipment. This is how the goals of any armed conflict are achieved. Of course, it would be best if civilian losses are kept to a minimum, but for the US it’s more of a secondary rather than a primary objective.

The US Navy and Air Force traditionally strike before dawn with one purpose alone – to avoid the antiaircraft artillery (both small and medium-caliber), as well as a number of air defense systems with optical tracking, firing at them. Besides, a strike in the dark hours of the day affects the morale of the enemy personnel.

Here we need to understand that Iran would instantly retaliate, and Tehran has no small capabilities for that. In other words, it would be a full-scale war. For the US, it wouldn’t end with one surgical airstrike without consequences, like in Syria. And the US seems to have a very vague idea on what a military victory over Iran would look like.

Also on rt.com
US will not ‘stumble into’ war with Iran by mistake. If it happens, it will be by design

There is no doubt that a prolonged air campaign by the US will greatly undermine Iran’s military and economic potential and reduce the country to the likes of Afghanistan, completely destroying its hydrocarbon production and exports industries.

To say how long such a campaign could last would be too much of a wild guess, but we have the examples of Operation Desert Storm in 1991 when airstrikes lasted for 38 days, and Yugoslavia in 1991 when the bombing continued for 78 days. So, theoretically, the US could bomb Iran for, say, 100 days, wrecking the country’s economy and infrastructure step by step.

However, the price the US would have to pay for starting such a military conflict may turn out to be too high.

For instance, Iran can respond to US aggression by launching intermediate and shorter-range ballistic missiles to target oil and gas fields and terminals in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE.

Should such a war really happen, the stakes would be very high, so there is every reason to assume that Iran’s missiles would not only be equipped with conventional high explosive fragmentation warheads, but would also carry toxic agents and dirty bombs.

Firstly, it should be pointed out that even though the capabilities of US intelligence agencies are almost limitless, quite a few Iranian missile launching sites remain undiscovered. Secondly, US air defense systems in the Persian Gulf, no matter how effective, would not shoot down every last Iranian missile. And even a handful of Tehran’s missiles reaching critical infrastructure in the Persian Gulf region would be enough to cause devastation.

On top of that, there are more questions than answers regarding the reliability of the antimissile and air defense systems that the Persian Gulf monarchies deployed to defend their hydrocarbon terminals and other oil and gas infrastructure.

Also on rt.com
$300 oil? US war with Iran spells catastrophe for global economy, expert tells RT

If such a scenario came true, that would bring inconceivable chaos to the global economy and would immediately drive up oil prices to $200-250 per barrel – and that’s the lowest estimate. It is these implications that are most likely keeping the US from attacking Iran.

To solve the problem of Iran once and for all, the US would need to mount a large-scale ground operation, with the US Army invading the country. America would have to wipe out both regular Iranian forces and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, unseat the current leadership of Iran, and have a military presence in every major city for the next 10 to 15 years, keeping tight control over the entire country at the same time.

For the record, the US failed to do that even in Afghanistan, which is several times smaller than Iran in terms of both territory and population. And almost 18 years of fighting later, the US has achieved next to nothing.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462647-cost-war-us-iran/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
by Joseph P. Farrell With all the bad weather over the American plains states, people
Justice Minister Morgan Johansson is currently investigating whether or not runes should be banned in
Antiwar.com reports… As Trump Administration officials continue to talk up war with Iran, one would
May 19, 2019 By TLAV A rocket lands in Green Zone in Iraq. Trump appears
May 14th, 2019 By Juliet Tang Contributing writer for Wake Up World “If you plan on being

Hits: 20

US lapdog Jeremy Hunt prepping British public for war with Iran, just in case Trump asks

With the US doing its level best to raise tensions with Iran, Hunt has revealed himself to be every bit the pathetic poodle of Washington that Tony Blair and ex-foreign secretary Jack Straw were in 2003 before the invasion of Iraq.

Campaigning for the Tory leadership in Scotland on Monday, Hunt pretended to be “very concerned” about the recent attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman, which he claimed were “almost certainly” the work of Iran. He offered no new evidence, of course — but then again, he didn’t need it; “instinct” had already told him that the Trump administration’s chief warmongers, John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, were telling him the truth.

Also on rt.com
Who needs proof? Britain believes US claims on Iran because ‘they’re our closest ally’

US requests for military support would be evaluated on a “case-by-case” basis, Hunt said, adding that the British government wanted to “de-escalate the situation” with Iran. Readers might recall it was only last week that Hunt branded Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn“pathetic and predictable” and accused him of “incredibly dangerous … virulent anti-Americanism” for the sin of calling for de-escalation — so let the level of the foreign secretary’s sincerity be calculated with that in mind.

Hunt was right about one thing, though. Corbyn’s reaction was indeed predictable. When one million gathered for a massive anti-war rally at London’s Hyde Park in February 2003, Corbyn was there, making an impassioned and prophetic speech against the impending invasion of Iraq — a war in which he said there would be “no justice whatsoever” and which would “set off a spiral of conflict, of hate, of misery, of desperation” that would only fuel more terrorism.

Sixteen years later, with one million dead in Iraq, a disastrously destabilized Middle East and jihadists running rampant across the region, the warmongering British elite are readying themselves to do it all over again — only this time, geopolitical and military analysts are warning, the results could be even more disastrous.

Britain’s instant, slavish support for the US’ flimsy narrative against Iran is even more pathetic when you consider that other usually staunch US allies are openly questioning Washington’s claims. Germany and Japan have both cast doubt on the Trump administration’s assessments, making room for Britain to confirm its role as the most reliable of US lapdogs once again.

There have been attempts in the past to whitewash Britain’s role in the Iraq war, with some eager to claim Tony Blair was tricked or “duped” into the conflict by Washington. Yes, Colin Powell iconically waved a vial of anthrax around at the UN in 2003, warning of Saddam Hussein’s non-existent WMD’s — but Blair’s government concocted its own set of fabrications. Blair was not tricked or duped, he was a willing architect, who enthusiastically spun lies for Bush.

Also on rt.com
US will not ‘stumble into’ war with Iran by mistake. If it happens, it will be by design

The 2016 Chilcot report revealed that when then foreign-secretary Jack Straw was advised that the evidence against Iraq “would not convince” the public of an imminent threat, publication of the government’s intelligence report was postponed until juicier details could be dreamed up. Later, the Hutton inquiry revealed that Straw had been instrumental in “hardening up” the now-infamous “dodgy dossier” with what his private secretary referred to in a 2004 email as the “killer paragraph.”

That dossier, overseen by Blair spin-doctor Alistair Campbell, included the false claim that Iraq could launch a chemical weapons strike against Britain within “45 minutes.” When the BBC revealed that the document had been “sexed up” to convince the public to support the war, Blair’s government set about ruining the life of top weapons inspector Dr. David Kelly, the man who had revealed their deceit to the BBC. Kelly was later found dead, officially from suicide, though some still believe his death was suspicious.

It’s at these moments when the public should be questioning why the men who got it so wrong on Iraq are swanning around still capable of commanding respect, while those who got it right are labelled unpatriotic and dangerous.

The warmongers — with ample help from the media — have been remarkably successful in preventing anti-war rhetoric from creeping into public discourse and becoming a “mainstream” view. Anti-war voices have been belittled and sidelined, because their voices represent the gravest danger to the elite. To hell with Iranian civilians, imagine how dangerous peace would be for the American and British weapons manufacturers.

Prominent anti-war figures like Corbyn pose such a threat to the war profiteering of the ruling classes that Pompeo was even caught on tape promising that the US would do its “level best” to prevent the Labour leader from becoming prime minister. Pompeo dressed up his promise to interfere in Britain’s domestic politics in fake concerns over “anti-Semitism” — but anyone who is even half-awake can see that Corbyn’s decades of anti-war activism would be the real cause of sleepless nights in Washington if he became PM.

Also on rt.com
Kremlin compares US attacks on Iran to fake ‘white powder evidence’ against Iraq in 2003

For now, Trump has managed to convince the media that he “doesn’t want war” with Iran — though whether he is sincere or not is another question entirely. The president who promised an end to pointless wars is quite clearly playing ‘good cop’ to Bolton and Pompeo’s ‘bad cop’ — buttering up the media and prepping the propagandized public to believe he did all he could to avoid conflict if one eventually comes.

Britain is playing along, slotting into its usual role as the supportive sidekick, ready to eat up whatever dodgy evidence Washington produces — and, no doubt preparing to concoct some of its own to go with it.

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462586-jeremy-hunt-uk-support-iran-war/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
US President Donald Trump was mocked by Iranians on Tuesday, as some claimed he had
And if it does, why does America not tell the world where Iran’s secret nuclear
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/iran-trump-benshapiro-why-did-trump-defy-the-warmongers-and-decide-not-to-attack-iran-the-duran-streamed-live-on-jun-21-2019/
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/iran-trump-drone-the-duran-live-e39-mixed-signalsthe-duran-streamed-live-on-jun-21-2019contradicting-news-headlines-claim-that-trump-ordered-srikes-against-iran-while-at-the-same-time-calling-o/
After Iran unceremoniously slammed the door on diplomacy, President Trump has decided to tweet his

Hits: 24

Cri-me-a-blues: Sanctimonious sanctions on Russia are damaging the EU, so why renew them?

‘Understand and not judge’ was the philosophy of the legendary Belgian crime writer Georges Simenon and it’s his objectivity and lack of sanctimony which arguably makes his Inspector Maigret novels so refreshing to read in an age when everyone seems so opinionated and keen to virtue-signal.

It’s a pity that those behind the decision to extend some sanctions on Russia for another six months because of “a lack of Minsk Agreements implementation” and others for a further one year on account of Russia’s “annexation” of Crimea, didn’t read Simenon before they made their call.

Instead of applying common sense and doing what is best for European economies, EU leaders are doing the opposite to what Simenon recommended. They are judging and not understanding.

The rationale behind the sanctions is punishment for Russia for ‘annexing’ Crimea. Which brings to mind another wise aphorism, this time from Friedrich Nietzsche: “Mistrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful”.

When it comes to the turmoil in Ukraine context is everything. We’re expected to see what’s going on there only in close-up, to zoom-in on Russia’s ‘annexation’ of the Crimea and not see the bigger picture.

It is a simple truth that Crimea would not have been reclaimed by Russia, and there would have been no separatist movement in the east of Ukraine, had there been no ‘regime-change’ operation in 2014 to topple the democratically-elected government of Viktor Yanukovych. The fragile post-Soviet consensus that an independent Ukraine would neither tilt too far to the east to Russia, or to the west, which survived even the ’Orange Revolution’ of 2004-5, was broken. Ukraine would now be a de facto Western colony. Just listen to the leaked tape recording of the US State Department’s Victoria Nuland discussing with US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, who should and shouldn’t be in the new ’democratic’ government, if you still have any doubts.

Also on rt.com
‘F**k the EU’: Snr US State Dept. official caught in alleged phone chat on Ukraine

Russia’s use of Sevastopol as the home for its Black Sea fleet was in serious jeopardy and given the fact that hard-core, Russian-hating Ukrainian ultra-nationalists were at the forefront of the regime-change operation, Ukraine’s Russian population had cause for concern too.

Given the events of February 2014, the reclaiming of Crimea by the Russian Federation, which was endorsed overwhelmingly by the Russian-majority people of the province in a referendum, was entirely predictable and understandable.

In fact, it beggars belief that anyone would think the majority of Crimeans would want to stay tied to Kiev, given the political changes that had taken place. This does not necessarily mean that we support what happened, only that we understand it.  

Unfortunately the West’s leaders in shaping their response took their cue not from the pipe-smoking, non-judgemental man-of-the-world Inspector Maigret, but from Uriah Heep, the nauseating hand-wringing hypocrite in Charles Dickens’ David Copperfield. “Heep is an affront not just because he is evil, but because he’s society’s fault. Our fault. He is the part of us that enjoys flattery, that likes to hear the word ‘yes’ loud and often, and doesn’t mind feeling superior to other people,”writes Sam Jordison in his article on Heep from the Guardian in 2015.

Russia’s ‘annexation’ of Crimea was a “great crime,” declared those who had actually supported far worse and far less justified annexations and invasions by other countries. “It’s an incredible act of aggression, it really is a stunning willful choice by President Putin to invade another country,”raged then-US Secretary of State John Kerry, conveniently forgetting that just over a decade earlier his own country had illegally invaded oil-rich Iraq on the fraudulent grounds that it possessed WMDs.

One million people died following that “incredible act of aggression” yet for some Western virtue-signalers, the relatively bloodless return of Crimea to Russia was a far more heinous action. Have sanctions been imposed on the US and other countries, who invaded Iraq? Perish the thought! But we are supposed to back seemingly everlasting sanctions on Russia.

The costs of these sanctions have been extraordinary. Last week at his Direct Line Q&A session with members of the public in Moscow, President Putin claimed that sanctions and the counter-sanctions Russia had imposed, had cost the EU $240 billion since 2014. Russia itself had lost $50 billion.

Also on rt.com
Sanctions cost European economies $240 billion while Russia lost $50 billion – Putin

If we go to Western sources, a report in October 2017 from the Austrian Institute of Economic Research found that Russian sanctions had cost EU countries 30 billion euro. EU exports to Russia in 2013, the year before sanctions were introduced, were worth 120 billion euro, in 2016, they had dropped to just 72 billion.

Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

We all know that Europe has come under great pressure from the US, which does far less trade with Russia, to keep the sanctions in place but shouldn’t European leaders be putting their countries, their businesses and their people first?

As to blaming Russia for a “lack of Minsk agreements implementation,” the sanctions relating to Crimea were introduced before there were any Minsk agreements.

One suspects that goalpost-moving is in operation here by those who are quite happy to see Europe and Russia continuing to take a big financial hit.

Georges Simenon would not be impressed by EU leaders going along with it.

Follow Neil Clark @NeilClark66

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462574-eu-russia-sanctions-ukraine/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
Press TV – Syria lashes out at the United States over its new sanctions targeting
IRNA – The US unilateral sanctions and economic war against the Iranian nation is impeding
“Economic sanctions”, a mode of coercion in international relations resuscitated in recent years, has prompted
Actions: No War, No Coup, End The Sanctions, Troops Home Now UNAC supports the call
US Sanctions Violate Human Rights And International Code Of Conduct Above Photo: Torbjorn Toby Jorgensen/Flickr GENEVA

Hits: 18

Joe Sestak, early Democratic critic of Israel, announces presidential run

April 26, 2016 photo of Congressman Joe Sestak, center, his wife Susan Sestak, left, and daughter Alex Sestak react after speaking to supporters gathered outside his campaign headquarters in Media, Pa. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Sestak, a retired Navy admiral and two-term Democratic Pennsylvania congressman, called for easing Israel’s blockade of Gaza. He then ran in a primary bid against Arlen Specter, the pro-Israel senator who had just switched from Republican to Democrat. The Dem establishment, including Obama, backed Specter, but Sestak won the primary. Conservative pro-Israel groups spent millions targeting Sestak, who then narrowly lost the general election to Republican Pat Toomey…

Ron Kampeas reports in JTA:

WASHINGTON (JTA) — Joe Sestak, whose failed 2010 Senate race was a precursor of this decade’s shift among Democrats toward increased criticism of Israel’s government, is running for president.

Sestak, 67, is the 25th candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. His announcement Monday referred to his foreign policy experience, and his advocacy for tax reform and addressing climate change.

Sestak was a retired Navy admiral and two-term Democratic Pennsylvania congressman in 2009 when he announced a primary bid against Arlen Specter, the Jewish senator who had just switched parties from Republican to Democrat.

The party establishment, including President Barack Obama, backed Specter, but Sestak won the primary. He went on to narrowly lose the general election to Republican Pat Toomey, who is still one of the state’s two senators.

Sestak was one of the first endorsees of the then newly established J Street, a Jewish Middle East policy group that favors a two-state solution and pressure on Israel to bring it about.

Conservative pro-Israel groups spent millions targeting Sestak, citing J Street’s backing and his calling on Obama to pressure Israel to ease its blockade on the Gaza Strip.

Sestak’s departures from mainstream pro-Israel orthodoxies, rare at the time, have become commonplace among Democrats, and J Street is now a force to be reckoned with among Democrats vying for Congress, endorsing more than half the party’s caucuses in Congress.

Sestak ran again for the Senate in 2016, walking across the entire state to campaign, but lost the primary.

Sestak’e campaign website is here.

Politico reported in 2010:

Leading conservatives will launch a new pro-Israel group this week with a scathing attack on Rep. Joe Sestak, the Democratic Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, the first shot in what they say will be a confrontational campaign against the Obama administration’s Mideast policy and the Democrats who support it.

The Emergency Committee for Israel’s Leadership unites two major strands of support for the Jewish state: The hawkish, neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of whom are Jewish, and conservative Evangelical Christians who have become increasingly outspoken in their support for Israel. The new group’s board includes Weekly Standard Editor William Kristol and Gary Bauer, the former Republican presidential candidate who leads the group American Values, as well as Rachel Abrams, a conservative writer and activist.

“We’re the pro-Israel wing of the pro-Israel community,” said Kristol.

While President Barack Obama and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attempted to put the best public face on their differences after a White House meeting last week, the two leaders have had a contentious relationship. Some American backers of Israel, as well as many Israelis, remain deeply suspicious of Obama’s efforts to press Israel toward specific policy shifts and to improve American relations with the Muslim world.

The new committee declined to disclose its funding — as a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization, it isn’t required to — but said it had raised enough to air its first ad, starting this week, on Fox and CNN and during a Philadelphia Phillies game. The ad attacks Sestak for signing a letter criticizing Israel’s blockade of Gaza while not signing a defense of Israel circulated by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and for appearing at a fundraiser for the Council on American Islamic Relations…”  Read more


Source Article from https://israelpalestinenews.org/joe-sestak-early-democratic-critic-of-israel-announces-presidential-run/

Related Posts
Screengrab from Mike Gravel’s campaign video Presidential candidate Mike Gravel says, “The two-state solution is
US President Donald Trump says he would be willing to accept damaging information from
@LiberatePalestine, et al Jeremy Salt nails Kushner, Trump, Netanyahu, et al, to the wall: https://ahtribune.com/world/north-africa-south-west-asia/palestine/3203-the-joke-of-the-century.html
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.—“Many of the things I’m going to say today would be slanderous
Gravel, who is currently running for president, shared a clip from his appearance on RT’s

Hits: 36

Trump: War President or Anti-Interventionist? By Patrick J. Buchanan Tuesday – June 25, 2019

And if it does, why does America not tell the world where Iran’s secret nuclear facilities are located and demand immediate inspections?

“No further sponsoring of terror,” Trump says.

But what does that mean?

As the major Shiite power in a Middle East divided between Sunni and Shiite, Iran backs the Houthi rebels in Yemen’s civil war, Shiite Hezbollah in Lebanon, Alawite Bashar Assad in Syria, and the Shiite militias in Iraq who helped us stop ISIS’s drive to Baghdad.

In his 12 demands, Pompeo virtually insisted that Iran abandon these allies and capitulate to their Sunni adversaries and rivals.

Not going to happen. Yet, if these demands are nonnegotiable, to be backed up by sanctions severe enough to choke Iran’s economy to death, we will be headed for war.

No more than North Korea is Iran going to yield to U.S. demands that it abandon what Iran sees as vital national interests.

As for the U.S. charge that Iran is “destabilizing” the Middle East, it was not Iran that invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, overthrew the Gadhafi regime in Libya, armed rebels to overthrow Assad in Syria, or aided and abetted the Saudis’ intervention in Yemen’s civil war.

Iran, pushed to the wall, its economy shrinking as inflation and unemployment are rising, is approaching the limits of its tolerance.

And as Iran suffers pain, it is saying, other nations in the Gulf will endure similar pain, as will the USA. At some point, collisions will produce casualties and we will be on the up escalator to war.

Yet, what vital interest of ours does Iran today threaten?

Trump, with his order to stand down on the missile strike on Iran, signaled that he wanted a pause in the confrontation.

Still, it needs to be said: The president himself authorized the steps that have brought us to this peril point.

Trump pulled out of and trashed Obama’s nuclear deal. He imposed the sanctions that are now inflicting something close to unacceptable if not intolerable pain on Iran. He had the Islamic Revolutionary Guard declared a terrorist organization. He sent the Abraham Lincoln carrier task force and B-52s to the Gulf region.

If war is to be avoided, either Iran is going to have to capitulate, or the U.S. is going to have to walk back its maximalist position.

And who would Trump name to negotiate with Tehran for the United States?

The longer the sanctions remain in place and the deeper they bite, the greater the likelihood Iran will respond to our economic warfare with its own asymmetric warfare. Has the president decided to take that risk?

We appear to be at a turning point in the Trump presidency.

Does he want to run in 2020 as the president who led us into war with Iran, or as the anti-interventionist president who began to bring U.S. troops home from that region that has produced so many wars?

Perhaps Congress, the branch of government designated by the Constitution to decide on war, should instruct President Trump as to the conditions under which he is authorized to take us to war with Iran.

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/trump-war-president-or-anti-interventionist-by-patrick-j-buchanan-tuesday-june-25-2019/

Related Posts
Tasnim – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani plans to submit his administration’s proposed budget bill for
Israeli forces can be seen demolishing Palestinian homes in the village of Umm Al-Hiran, Negev
The track does not make it clear exactly where the aircraft landed, but it
     By Tuesday night, the region will be under a blanket of 10 to 15
report from the Daily Stormer It is self-help Tuesday, and this meme is accurate. If you’re

Hits: 49

Will Joe Repudiate His Segregationist Friends? By Patrick J. Buchanan 6/21/2019

“The Democratic Party, the oldest party on earth, was from its founding to the final third of the 20th century, the bastion of slavery, secession and segregation…”

“Apologize for what? Cory should apologize. He knows better. There’s not a racist bone in my body.”

Thus did a stung Joe Biden answer rival Cory Booker’s demand he apologize for telling contributors, in a southern drawl, “I was in a caucus with James O. Eastland, He never called me ‘boy.’ He always called me ‘son.”

Joe was recalling fondly a time in the 1970s when he came into the Senate at 30, having lost his wife and child in an accident, and “Jim” Eastland, the arch-segregationist from Mississippi, took him under his wing and became a patron, mentor and friend.

“You don’t joke about calling black men ‘boy’,” Booker had said. “Biden’s relationships with proud segregationists are not the model for how we make America a safer and more inclusive place for black people.”

Kamala Harris piled on: If Biden’s segregationist friends “had their way … I wouldn’t be in the United States Senate.”

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted a photo of his black wife and two children, saying, “Eastland thought my multiracial family should be illegal & that whites were entitled to ‘the pursuit of dead n——-s.’”

Said The Washington Post, “(Biden’s) history of collegiality with racists is being seen by many in his party as a reason to question his judgment — and not, as Biden says, a sign of his civility.”

This portends a coming clash over race inside the Democratic Party in 2019 and perhaps 2020. For Joe is bleeding and his rivals can see in his segregationist friends of yesterday a way to peel off the black support crucial to his nomination.

Biden is about to have his nose rubbed in friendships formed almost half a century ago.

Like reparations for slavery, on which hearings have opened in the House, this issue seems certain to arise in the debates next week, where taking down Biden will be an objective of every other candidate.

And Jim Eastland is not the only segregationist friend Joe had.

Joe called Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who conducted the longest filibuster in history against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, “one of my closest friends,” and delivered a eulogy at Strom’s funeral.

When Joe backed an anti-busing amendment in the 1970s, Sen. Jesse Helms, on the Senate floor, welcomed him to the “ranks of the enlightened.” On leaving the Senate for the vice presidency in 2009, Biden spoke of his “close personal relationships” with “Eastland, Stennis, Thurmond … all these men became my friends.”

Those three Senators all signed the Southern Manifesto pledging “massive resistance” to desegregation of the public schools mandated by the Brown decision of 1954. All three opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, enacted after bloody Sunday at Selma Bridge.

Asked her views on Biden’s remarks, Elizabeth Warren joined the attack: “It’s never OK to celebrate segregationists. Never.”

But if that is the new Warren Rule in Democratic politics, it may be hard to maintain. For the Democratic Party, the oldest party on earth, was from its founding to the final third of the 20th century, the bastion of slavery, secession and segregation.

Jim Crow voted a straight Democratic ticket.

Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, founding fathers of the party, were slave owners, as were James Madison and James Monroe, who succeeded Jefferson in the White House. And so were John Tyler and James K. Polk, who succeeded them.

Washington, a slave owner, was the Father of our Country and gave us our independence and a new nation from the Atlantic to the Mississippi. Jefferson executed the Louisiana Purchase. Jackson seized Florida. Tyler annexed Texas. Polk got us the Southwest, California and clear title to Washington and Oregon. All were slave owners — and also the Democrats who gave America almost all of her land and frontiers.

The first Democratic president of the 20th century, Woodrow Wilson, restored segregation to the U.S. government. The second, FDR, chose a segregationist vice president, “Cactus Jack” Garner, put a Klansman, Hugo Black, on the Supreme Court, and, with Wilson, carried all 11 segregated states of the Old Confederacy, all six times they ran.

To hold a segregated South against Eisenhower in 1952, liberal Adlai Stevenson continued the Southern strategy by putting on his ticket John Sparkman of Alabama. Returning to the Senate after Adlai’s defeat, Sparkman signed the Dixie Manifesto and opposed the civil rights acts of both 1964 and 1965.

On his second run for the presidency over a decade ago, Joe Biden joked of his home state: “Delaware … was a slave state that fought beside the North. That’s only because we couldn’t figure out how to get to the South. There were a couple of states in the way.”

The Warren Rule notwithstanding, Southern segregationists remain honored today. The Old Senate Office Building was renamed in 1972 for Sen. Richard Russell of Georgia and John C. Stennis of Mississippi.

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/will-joe-repudiate-his-segregationist-friends-by-patrick-j-buchanan-6-21-2019/

Related Posts
This statement was released on July 23 as “International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network’s Response to the
“Who wants a U.S. war with Iran? Primarily the same people who goaded us into
“What are these “values” of which politicians incessantly talk? Are they immutable? Or do they
“As for war in our hemisphere, which Pence said was possible, that could come sooner
“If Trump believes, not without reason, that Pelosi’s caucus is out to kill his presidency,

Hits: 16

#CultureWars #LogosRising Our Interesting Times: Free Speech, Religious Freedom and Privilege E. Michael Jones Published on Jun 19, 2019

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/culturewars-logosrising-our-interesting-times-free-speech-religious-freedom-and-privilege-e-michael-jones-published-on-jun-19-2019/

Related Posts
Signs Of The Times Jewification Of America Articles Signs Of The Times By Brother Nathanael
JERUSALEM, PALESTINE — In a highly provocative statement — one that was most likely well
Senator Kamala Harris is seeking to separate herself from the Democratic field by being an
A recent article in The New York Times, a major mouthpiece for the establishment, is

Hits: 21

#Iran #Trump #BenShapiro Why did Trump defy the warmongers, and decide not to attack Iran? The Duran Streamed live on Jun 21, 2019

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/24/iran-trump-benshapiro-why-did-trump-defy-the-warmongers-and-decide-not-to-attack-iran-the-duran-streamed-live-on-jun-21-2019/

Related Posts
[False flag operations:] “The powers-that-be understand that to create the appropriate atmosphere for war, it’s
The US and 15 other nations, including Britain, France, and Canada, also declared their commitment
    Putin and Kim Announce the U.S. is Irrelevant by Tom Luongo The summit

Hits: 21

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes