The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Zionism is just another label that the Jews have invented to hide behind and blame their atrocities on. The Gentiles under Christianity have become servants of the Jews. Acting as physical and spiritual cattle for the Jews to harvest in building their Global Satanic Kingdom.

Wake up and Unite!... two things that we have been kept from doing.. by deception. When we Unite, we become unstoppable against Humanities greatest enemy the Jew.

If I converted to Buddhism, does that make me Chinese? If I converted to Hinduism, does that make me Indian? When Khazarians (Turks) converted to Judaism in 740 BC and stole the true Negro Hebrew identity, and turned them into slaves... did that make the counterfeit Jews Hebrew? Well, the Jew World Order seems to think so. They crucified Jesus Christ for exposing them.

The invention of the Muslim Terrorist by our Jewish Governments... to keep us in fear, and to justify raping the World, and slaughtering billions of innocent families in every country for power and control...for their 2 horned God Moloch.

Khazarian-Babylonian Mafia known as the JEW

Every Religion and Church has been infiltrated by the Jews. How do you know? ... if your Church has not discussed the below phrases by Christ... then it has been compromised.

True Islam. True Arabs. True Muslims.

True Islam. True Arabs. True Muslims.

True Islam. True Arabs. True Muslims. ( not Jews disguised as arabs)

Australian Jews imprison Brendon O’Connell’s Christian beliefs for 3 years

Australian Jews imprison Brendon O’Connell’s Christian beliefs for 3 years

Brendon O’Connell who exposes Zionist infiltration and operation Talpiot is currently being held in prison in New Zealand… Brendon O’Connell had already served 3 years prison in Australia… please share this around as this case is potentially a big one to expose the Jew World Order.

This is why Brendon left Iran, because he realized Iran was in bed with israel.

Why do Children go missing every year

Why do Children go missing every year

Jewish Blood Libels and Child Sacrifices to Satan, Moloch.

Jews are not Gods chosen people

Jews are not Gods chosen people

Does "Moses supposes erroneously?"Does "Moses supposes erroneously?"

Does “Moses supposes erroneously?”

By Robbie the Pict

‘Jews are not the ‘Chosen People’, Palestine is not the Promised Land The Jews were rejected by the Israelites as brutal gang-masters and tax extortionists. British Hebrew exposes world’s greatest scam.’
A limited inquiry into why the Jews think they are ‘Chosen’ above others, and entitled to other people’s real estate as their ‘Promised Land’.

This essay will found its basic argument on the contents of the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Old Testament, supposedly written by Moses but also rumoured to have been scripted by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus in the first century.  Short-hand on stone tablets is impossible so how was it recorded?  Leaving that aside, let us examine the contents, with the assistance of the First Book of Chronicles.

If we descend the family tree from Noah, our interest must focus on Shem, although a study of the sons of Japhet will also bring rewards. (See especially Antiquities of the Jews Book II, Chapter 6, by Josephus.)  One of Shem’s 5 sons was named Arphaxad, who in turn father Shelah, who fathered Eber.  At that point our interest is raised because Eber is accepted as the patriarch of the Hebrews.  Outside of the Old Testament myth-building, ‘habiru’ is simply the word for a wanderer.

Eber the first Hebrew had two sons, Peleg and Joktan.  I Chronicles 1, verse 20 seems to contain a misprint at this point, stating Joktan begat Almodad and twelve other sons, while verse 24 goes on to list another ten sons of Joktan without giving any mention to Peleg.  It would seem strange that Peleg had no sons and Joktan had twenty three.  (Falsus in unum, falsus in omnia?)

The last in the list of Joktan’s sons is “Abram, the same is Abraham” who had two sons Isaac and Ishmael.  I Chronicles I, verse 34 tells us “Abraham begat Isaac” and his sons were called Esau and Jacob, later Israel.  I Chronicles chapter 2 states “These are the sons of Israel; Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, Isachar and Zebulun, Dan, Joseph and Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad and Asher.”  These names should be noted carefully.  These are the twelve tribes of the House of Israel, but also known elsewhere as the Sons of Isaac.

It should also be noted that the children of Israel have a sister Dinah.  We can but look forward to the revelation of the Dinahites as a full-blown Israeli tribe in their own right.  Perhaps the ‘woman’s touch’ could put the whole House of Israel in order.  Nothing says the next Messiah has to be male.

So what do these genealogical links leave us with?

  • The term Shemite is derived from Noah’s son Shem.
  • The term Hebrew is derived from Shem’s descendant Eber. Eber was a Shemite, and the first Hebrew. The first Hebrew could not be a Jew or even an Israelite because neither had come into being at that time.
  • Abraham in turn was Eber’s descendant. Abraham was a Shemite and a Hebrew, but still could not be a Jew or Israelite because neither yet existed.
  • Isaac was Abraham’s son. Isaac was a Shemite and a Hebrew, but could not be a Jew or an Israelite either because they didn’t exist.
  • Jacob, who God renamed Israel, was Isaac’s son. Israel was a Shemite and a Hebrew, but not a Jew.
  • Judah was only one of Israel’s twelve sons. Judah was a Shemite, a Hebrew, and an Israelite. The first Jews were the children of Judah. The descendants of the other eleven sons of Israel are not Jews. We will come to significant aspects of that fact later.

The Jewish myth about being the ‘Chosen People’ is supposedly founded in a reading of Deuteronomy 14.2.  It states: “For thou art a holy people unto the Lord thy God, and the Lord hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth.”  However, a reading of Deuteronomy 17.12, 21.20 and 26.15 makes it clear and confirmed that ‘the Lord’ is addressing Israel, not just the Tribe of Judah.

The promise is made to greater Israel, not just the Jews.  Sorry Zionists, but there are 13 other peoples just as ‘Chosen’ as you, namely the Reubenites, the Simeonites, the Levites, the Isacharites, the Zebulunites, the Danites, the Josephites, the Benjaminites, the Naphtalites, the Gadites and the Asherites.  To that must be added, from the sons of Joseph, the so-called ‘half-tribes’ or ‘step-tribes’ of Manassehites and Ephraimites.

However the story now takes a twist.  The House of Judah effectively shames itself OUT of the Kingdom of Israel, in reality becoming dis-enfranchised, to the extent that it ignores the commandments of the Lord laid out in Deuteronomy to keep Israel decent and thus one must assume alienates itself from any position of private peculiarity to God.

The historical event which caused the departure of the Jews from the bosom of Israel happened over 2,800 years ago and the rift has never been healed.  The circumstances were roughly as follows.  When Solomon died in 796 BC his son Rehoboam traveled to Schechem in the center of the country occupied by the Israelites for the crowning ceremony, as was traditional.  Although occupying a smaller territory in the south, along with the Benjaminites, the House of Judah maintained the ‘royal’ line of David and had provided the Kings of Israel.  When he traveled north to Schechem for his coronation in the land of Ephraim, he was met by elders from the House of Israel who complained of increases in taxation and excessive conscription of men as labor, beneficial only to the House of Judah.

Rehoboam had a fit at this disrespectful demonstration of impertinence and immediately doubled the taxation and threatened them with scorpions where Solomon had only used bull-whips.  Less than enamored by the new king’s diplomacy, the Israeli elders walked out on his coronation, went back to their tents and elected their own King Jeroboam.  The unfortunate gang-master Adiram was sent to the new northern kingdom to whip up some recruits for laboring down south and the response was to stone him to death.

This attempted extortion of excessive taxation from their own brothers caused a terminal fracture in the Israeli family, making it truly a ‘house divided’.  It has stayed that way ever since.  From that day on the Kingdom of Judah was divorced from the Kingdom of Israel.  There is therefore an argument, and a very good one in law, that Judah has blotted its copy-book and put itself out the will, so to speak.  It has disqualified itself, disgraced itself and thus dis-enfranchised itself from any favor or considerations which may or may not have been promised to the chosen people.  They are no longer of that people.  They are Judeans, not Israelis.

We can conclude this point with an additional observation in ‘God and My Birthright’ by Dr, J. Llewellyn Thomas, suggesting that this split had been pending and obvious long before “The distinction between Israel and Judah did not commence at the time of the rending of the kingdom after the death of Solomon.  One has only to read the preceding chapters of the books of Samuel to realize that from the days of king Saul the distinction between Israel and Judah is most marked.  The term Israel, except in a very few instances where it very obviously applies to the whole twelve tribes, is used of the tribes to the exclusion of Judah.

The Promised Land – A small but important observation.

That there would be a divinely-chosen place where Israel would be brought together is plainly stated in the scriptures.  God makes a remarkable promise in II Samuel 7.10.  He says “Moreover, I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more:  neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime.”  I Chronicles 17.9 says something similar:  “also I will ordain a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, and they shall dwell in their place, and shall be moved no more…”

Note that this promise was made to King David when the Israelites were already established in Palestine – ‘the Promised Land’ – and at a time when the kingdom did indeed already extend from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates and was at the peak of its power.  So when the Lord says “I will appoint a place for my people Israel and will plant them” the appointed place or promised  land cannot be Palestine.  That’s where they are standing.  It must be somewhere else, and it is for the whole of Israel, not just the House of Judah.

Dr Thomas’s view is that “This promise of God to David was given at a time when these terms ‘Israel’ and ‘Judah’ had meanings which were clear and distinctive, and became still more so during the long history of these separated peoples.”

A reading of ‘Antiquities of the Jews’ by Flavius Josephus, at Book 1, Chapter 6 is illuminating to reveal how a large number of European nations derive their origins from the ten tribes.  The detail readers can discover for themselves using the wonderful internet, but suffice for our purposes to say that it appears that the Anglo-Saxon Israel adherents have been right all along.  The Israelites proper are now scattered throughout European Christendom, principally centered in the British archipelago but also in the Scandinavian and Germanic countries.  For American readers, you seem to be disguising the Tribe of Manasseh, who along with Ephraim (now the English) comprised the House of Joseph.

The Jews are thus revealed as fraudulent scoundrels, continuing an eons-old tradition of criminal deception and extortion.  However one small matter might need clarification.  Recent writings have claimed DNA proof that the current occupants of Israel are not genuine Jews, but Ashkenazis from Kazakstan.  It should though be noted that in the seventh century AD, a tribe of so-called ‘Jews’ arrived in Kazakstan, having been turfed out of both Persia and Anatolia for the crime of usury, a practice prohibited by Muslim religion.  These banished crooks presented themselves to the Kazak king as royalty and inveigled their way onto the throne (King Joseph) of this rough nomadic society, by the ruse of marrying into the Kazak ‘royal’ family.  From this new powerbase east of Crimea they hustled their way into Europe and also back to the Levant through the Dardanelles and Turkey.  So there may be a smidgeon of Jew in them after all.

As I have stated elsewhere in VT absolute truth is another myth, so I can only point at clues and indications.  However if there is a God who chooses one part of his family over another and promises them real estate into the bargain, he’s not for me.  I’m with Jesus on the ‘promised land is within’ line, which puts us all on the same life-mains supply.  We are but one, so let us not self-harm, or extort, or deceive.

The Holy Bible of the Hebrews is by today’s standards a handbook and bid for white race supremacy.  The actions of the celebrated King David are those of a murderous thug.  The ‘uncircumcised’ Philistines/Palestinians are treated abominably.  For other Caucasians there is one good reply to Jewish charges of ‘anti-semitism’.  The bulk of ‘christendom’, spread throughout Europe, North America and the antipodes is likely to be the progeny of the ten tribes and we are not only mainly white but also Sons of Shem or Semites, just as the Jews are.  Logic dictates that inter-tribal criticism of indecent behavior is just that, contemptible conduct which gives us Shemites a bad name.  Race is essentially based on skin color.  It is white-on-white to criticize indecent Jewish crimes, an attempt to end practices which risk return fire on all other white tribes.  You can’t shut that down by calling it hate crimes, racism or terror.  You caused it Tel Aviv and so Bibi et al., you are both busted and about to get some payback!


Source Article from http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/28/hebrew-israelite-and-jew/

History of the Khazarians, today’s Jews

The Edomites are descendants of Esau (“hairy, rough”), the eldest son of Isaac, and twin brother of Jacob, whose singular appearance at birth originated the name (Gen 25:25). Also, he was given the name of Edom (“red”)  from his conduct in connection with the red lentil “pottage” for which he sold his birthright (Gen. 25:30, Gen. 25:31).

Esau was much loved by his father and was, because he was first-born, his heir but was tricked into selling his birthright to his younger brother, Jacob, with the help of his mother, for a meal of red lentil pottage. Esau lost his father’s birthright and his paternal blessing due to Jacob’s subterfuge and thus raised the anger of Esau, who vows vengeance (Gen. 25:29-34; 27:1-41).  Yahweh thereafter called Esau, “Edom” and the country subsequently settled by Esau/Edom and his brood was “the country of Edom” (Gen 32:3). Jacob, the grandson of Abraham and Sarah, the son of Isaac and Rebecca, is the ancestor of the Israelites. Later, Yahweh told Jacob that his name was no longer Jacob, but henceforth, Israel (Gen. 32:22-32; Gen. 35:10). Jacob’s twelve sons were the ancestors of the Twelve Tribes of Israel and their descendants are described as the Twelve Tribes of Israel originally identified by the names of the twelve sons of Jacob: the Patriarchs Joseph, Judah, Issachar, Benjamin, Levi, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Simeon, Dan, Zebulun, Reuben. Later, Joseph’s two sons, his eldest, Manasseh and his second son, Ephraim, were adopted by Jacob as his own and so those two tribes replaced Joseph and Levi among the Twelve of Israel.  The patriarch Judah was the fourth son born to Jacob (Gen 29:35).

The Edomites were thus the progeny of Esau, whose name was Edom, so called from the red lentil pottage he sold his birthright for to his brother Jacob (later, at Yahweh’s behest, called Israel). These Edomites were also separate from the Twelve Tribes of Israel and so were not true Israelites. They lived separately in a different land nurturing an enmity originating with their patriarch, Esau/Edom for Jacob/Israel and his descendants: a hatred born of a deep sense of injustice and betrayal that birthright and grace had been arrogated by trickery. Edom’s violence against Israel (Jacob) was so intense not only due to a sense of betrayal but also because they both came from the same parents (Isaac and Rebekah); in fact, this great and enduring enmity began in Rebekah’s womb, continued as the boys grew to manhood and endured until today in the phenomenon of the struggle of nations. Moreover, because of this enduring bitterness and jealousy, Esau would have destroyed Jacob had Yahweh not intervened

Ezekiel 35:1-15 describes Yahweh’s judgement on, and devastation of, Edom who exulted over Israel’s humiliation, who was their most bitter foe, and who “had a perpetual hatred to them, to the very name of an Israelite.” Esau/Edom in his hate and anger pursued “his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath for ever.” (Amos 1:11). Hence, the Edomites’ “perpetual hatred” and “wrath forever” toward Israelites. That is, this seminal struggle of nations, which began in Rebekah’s womb, endures today in the modern-day descendants of Israel (Jacob) and Edom (Esau) …. a great struggle between the Israelites and the Edomites.

The Edomites lived and prospered in a land separate from Israel but were later attacked and defeated by Saul (1 Sam. 14:47) and some forty years later, by David (2 Sam. 8:13-14).  Later, in the reign of Jehosaphat, (c 914 BC), the Edomites attempted to invade Israel, but failed (2 Chron. 20:22). They later joined with Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Chaldea, in his invasion of Judaea, the Judaean kingdom of the Two Tribes, and helped in his destruction of Jerusalem as well as the subsequent deportation of the Judaeans to Babylonia (c 630-562 BC). The terrible cruelty displayed by the Edomites at this time provoked fearful denunciations by the later prophets (Isa 34:5-8; Isa 63:1-4; Jer 49:17). Afterwards, the Edomites invaded and held possession of the south of Palestine but they eventually fell under the growing Chaldean power (Jer 27:3, Jer 27:6). The Edomites were thus Semites since they are closely related in blood and in language to the Israelites but they had no claim on the unique Bible Covenant and Birthright Promises gifted by Yahweh to Abraham, then to Jacob/Israel and then to his descendants. However, for more than four centuries, the Edomites continued to prosper but during the warlike rule of the Maccabeans, they were again completely subdued, and even forced to conform to Jewish laws and rites, and submit to the government of Jewish prefects. Here, at this time, the Edomites become incorporated within the resurgent Judaean kingdom.

Edomites are therefore descended from Edom (Esau) whose descendants later intermarried with the Turks to produce a Turco-Edomite mixture which later became known as Khazars. That is, most of today’s Jews are descendants of this interbreeding that produced a race called Khazars who had once governed an empire called Khazaria. Furthermore, this hybrid race Edomite/Turk/Khazar who created the Khazar kingdom and who between the seventh and ninth centuries AD, adopted the religion of Judaism. And, it is these Khazar Jews who are the ancestors of the vast majority of today’s Jewish people. That is, Edomite/Turk/Khazars are the ancestors of the modern “Jews” including the Torah-true and Zionist Jews who spuriously claim right to the land of Palestine claiming it it is theirs by biblical demands and ancestral rights.

Consequently, the majority of today’s Jewish people are known as “Jews” not because they are Judahites and descended from Jacob/Israel but because their Edomite/Turk/Khazar ancestors in their Kingdom of Khazaria adopted the religion of Judaism, called themselves “Jews” and arrogated the Birthright Promises and Bible Covenants belonging to the Israelites, but especially those belonging to the Judahites.

Thus, “Jews” are not Israelites and certainly they are not Judahites. Hence, modern Jews are not heir to the Bible Covenants nor to the ancient Nation of Israel given by Yahweh to the Israelites and the Judahites and so have no Divine Right or biblical mandate to the modern Land of Palestine.

Similarly, Jesus of Nazareth was not a “Jew” he was a Judahite, and Jesus Christ was not “King of the Jews.”

Our Communist Judeo Society

Our Communist Judeo Society

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

Gay Homosexual Jews are GODS

Gay Homosexual Jews are GODS

Jews Control Islam and We’ll Use It to Destroy the West.

Jews Control Islam and We’ll Use It to Destroy the West.

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack and Fake Muslim Groups

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack and Fake Muslim Groups

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Jews Control All Governments in Every Country

Jews Control All Governments in Every Country

Muslim Mother confronting the ISRAEL CIA ISIS Terrorists

Muslim Mother confronting the ISRAEL CIA ISIS Terrorists


London Bridge staged Terrorist Attack by Government

London Bridge staged Terrorist Attack by Government


Jews faking the News again

Jews faking the News again

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas


Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist


Are you a real Christian?

Are you a real Christian?

Or are you led by the devil himself.

What did the Jews do to Germany in 1930?

What did the Jews do to Germany in 1930?

More Jewish Terrorism

Special Notice to all Jews

Special Notice to all Jews

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

What World-famous Men have said About the Jews

What World-famous Men have said About the Jews


The Jews are the only people in the world who have found hostility in every country in which they settled in any numbers. The big question is — WHY?

Today it is taught in the schools that “Anti-Semitism” began in Germany in the 1930s after which they were deported. What is not studied is the fact that at one time or other the Jews have been expelled from every nation in Europe! When the Jews first began to immigrate to America the early colonialists in New York, Charleston and Savannah tried to ban their entry. Benjamin Franklin pleaded with the members of the Continental Congress to enter a specific ban against Jewish immigration into the U. S. Constitution to bar them for all time to come.

The Jews claim that they are “only” a religion. The truth is that the Jews are a RACE of Khazarian / Babylonian Mongol Turks. Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists — they still claim to be Jews — members of the Jewish race! Every race has inherited traits. In the case of the Jews they include trading, money-changing, Murder, Satanism, Child sacrifices, Pedophilia, Beastiality, Slavery, usury, and a loathing for “productive labor” which is scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their “bible” called “THE TALMUD.”

The Jews have not changed since the days when Jesus Christ took up a whip and drove “the money changers out of the Temple.” Jews have always united to form monopolies. Today they control all the department store chains, Music industry, Hollywood, TV, Radio Industry, News and Media Industry, Organised Crime, Slave trade, Drug Trafficking, Governments, Large Corporations, Medical industry, Terrorism, Drug Industry, Oil Industry, Creating new viruses in Labs, creating more Poverty, creating famine, Child trafficking, Organ trafficking, Sex slaves, Pedophilia networks, Blood diamonds, Ivory industry, Exotic animals, Fur industry,and specialty shops along with the lucrative jewelry and animal fur trade. Jews dominate the fields of all precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, tin, lead, etc. They will always ban together to drive Gentile competitors out of business… by defaming them, or slaughtering them.

Today America is being flooded with Jewish immigrants from Russia and even 20,000 per year leave Israel for the U. S. — all with dollar signs in their eyes. Jews have used their vaunted money-power to seize control of every Political Party in every country. Today they own nearly every Corporation around the Globe. While only 3% of the population, the Jews control over 90% of the nation’s wealth and this percentage rises every year. They are the only racial group totally organized to work for political domination over the planet.

Opposition to the Jews did not begin in Germany but dates back before the birth of Christ over 2,000 years ago! Study the statements made by “The world’s greatest men.” They reveal why the “wandering Jews” have made enemies out of every host country that ever accepted them.

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman, writer.

“Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.” (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to “speak softly” shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote: “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher. “The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors.” (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form: “The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.” (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian.Observed that Jews treated other people as enemies and inferiors. “Usury” is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described himself as a “barking dog” when dealing with Jews: “Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor, shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect those who feed them, and I, who am feed by the poor, shall I see them robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?” (E. Flornoy, Le Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his “On the Governance of the Jews,” he wrote: “The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9 “There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance . . . There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease.”

H. H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 “The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute.”

W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919 “The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?”

POPE CLEMENT VIII “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.”

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization, page 163 “Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has persistently shown himself ungrateful . . . The Jews have always formed a rebellious element in every state.”

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278 “The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.”

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. – then answered the Jews — ” (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William Hazlet, page 43 “But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them.”

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding, pages 114 – 115 “Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity.” Paul said: “You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism — how furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of may own age among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of my forefathers.” (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation).

While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism are filled with hate for Christians. Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination UNDER high sounding words that have a “RELIGIOUS” ring in the ears of Christians. The Jews use such “religious” sounding words as “the Jewish faith,” “the Jewish religion,” “Jewish spiritual values,” “Jewish religious doctrines,” and like phrases which deceive and lead the unlearned into total equanimity. Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, and the destruction of Christianity.

REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count Cherep-Spiridovich’s book The Secret World Government, page 194 “If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian principle which has protected him.”

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D. “The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John 7:1 “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him.”

M. H. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir “The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains “a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear.” “In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of “attack on public morals” and “pornography.” In delivering its verdict, the Court declared ‘INTER ALIA:’ “The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning.” QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 – 230 A. D.) Latin Church Father “The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian actions.”

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death, February, 1546 “Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much harm . . . You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day… for that reason you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions. Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings.”

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 – 1789) “Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.”

(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that “The Talmud is the real “bible” of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read “THE TALMUD UNMASKED” for the full shocking details.)

DIDEROT, DENIS. 18th century French scholar. His famous ENCYCLOPEDIE, the bible of the pre-revolutionary French “enlightenment,” has often been complained of by Jewish writers as ‘anti-Semitic.’ Some of Diderot’s other writings are likewise unfriendly: “And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear … Go, take back your books and remove yourselves from me. (LA MOISADE) [The Talmud] taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to regard them as savage beasts, to push them over the precipice . . . to kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible imprecations against them. (JUIFS)

NESTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370 “The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism . . .The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible.”

F. TROCASE, in Jewish Austria “No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy.”

COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian general “The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country. The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides.”

MOHAMMED, in the Koran “Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit.”

BACON, FRANCIS. 16th century British writer, politician. In his The New Atlantis, he remarked that Jews “hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against the people among whom they live.” He also disapproved of non-Jewish usurers as “Judaizers” who would wear “tawny bonnets” like Jews.

LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer. “They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther . . . On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope.

1). The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts . . . Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: “When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews.

2). Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.

3). A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile! If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself! Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service . . . And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants — yea, their cattle! I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews . . . Should someone think I am saying too much — I am saying much too little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish as all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks . . . No heathen has done such things and none would to so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses — as he possesses the Jews. Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the people of God. Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1,400 years ago during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem! . . . Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.

Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people? . . . Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country. For as heard before, God’s wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away with them! How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity! What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (From THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES) Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself. Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk.”

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co. “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a “CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,” at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. “I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America. “The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race — such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ — not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.) The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by “their worships” for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were ‘poor and persecuted:’ ” . . . and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company.” (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY) THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization “use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.” (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman. “Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in.” (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS) “Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people.” (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher. “There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is their reward.” (New York speech, October 30, 1937)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman. Opposed admission of Jewish immigrants to England because: “They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world… The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March 19. 1925) “Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face.”

WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosophy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish “TALMUD” which is the “bible” of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the “NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN” of February 3, 1949.)

CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician. In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the “national Jews” of Russia, he said: “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNYIN, MIKHYL. 19th century Russian revolutionary. “Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschild’s. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence . . . In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well — this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschild’s appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks . . . (Pol Emique contres les Juifs) This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers — overwhelmingly Jewish – since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described “Bolshevik banker” who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’ commissars.

WILHELM II. German Kaiser. “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949 “The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, New York speech, October 30, 1937 “When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top — And this is no hazard.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937 “The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.”

A. HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7 “History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals.”

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.”

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923 “The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.”

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10 “B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of “the Covenant,” or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government — which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.”

VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, quoted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10) “There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.) . . . Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.”

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316) “Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.”

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921 “Jews have always controlled the business . . . The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada . . . is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.”

M. OUDENDYK, the Netherlands’ Minister to Petrograd on September 6, 1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919 “. . . I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is till raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

A. N. FIELD, in Today’s Greatest Problem “Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one.”

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25 “The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom.”

A. N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208 “The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greatest physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history . . . The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl’s “terrible (Jewish) power of the purse”) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison.”

H. H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 “Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918.”

HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real “Crime,” page 6 “Communism and Judaism are one and the same.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 “There is nothing else in Communism — a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a “paradise on earth.”

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is — a Jewish scheme invented by Jews — that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.”

REV. KENNETH GOFF, in STILL ‘TIS OUR ANCIENT FOE, page 99 “The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization — as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution.”


SYLVESTER I. Condemned Jewish anti-Christian activity.

GREGORY I (‘The Great’). Protested wholesale circumcision of Christian slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls to Oriental and African buyers.

GREGORY VIII. Forbade Jews to have power over Christians, in a letter to Alfonso VI of Castile.

GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing “every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.”

BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared:

“The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing the truth.”

JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned “everywhere” and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings — an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.

PAUL IV. Cum nimis absurdim (1555) promulgated immediately after his coronation, was a powerful condemnation of Jewish usury. It embodies a model legal code to curb Jewish power that was recommended to all communities.

PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal States.

GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews “continue to plot horrible crimes” against Christians “with daily increasing audacity.”

CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum 1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce and “systematical despoliation” of the Christian through usury.

PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by Jewish writers.

BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against “the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder.” This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. — And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician. While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews: “I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold. (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)

1). The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.

2). Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.

3). No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits. By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American soldier. In a letter from Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote: “I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use — the purchase of arms and ammunition . . . Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it.” (The Sherman Letters)

ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military man. As did Generals ULYSSES S. GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish ‘carpetbagging’ cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote: “The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away.”

OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century American architect, historian. “A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out of business many of the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For other views on Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES S. GRANT and MARK TWAIN.)

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer. “In the U.S. cotton states, after the war . . . the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

1). The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm — like Joseph.

2). In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics — but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants — but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event . . . I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics. (“Concerning the Jews,” Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married — or was married by — the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete “Concerning the Jews” from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories.

1). Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a legitimate question whether there was any preplanning for the wholesale — and retail — economic looting done by mainly Jewish carpetbaggers after the war.

2). We have cited a host of other writers on the terrible economic depredation that Jewry visited on the people of Tzarist Russia.

ERNEST RENAN, French historian “The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but — and this is the most important factor — ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew . . . In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him.”

GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881 “The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.”

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer. “The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.” (Treatise on the Gods) The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht . . . (“not wanted.”) “I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish . . .”

“The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.” (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist. “This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925) This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

WAGNER, RICHARD. 19th century German composer. “The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a live of art-enabling import . . . “So long as the separate art of music had a real organic life-need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only when a body’s inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the power of judgment in it — yet merely to destroy it. On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and falsification of our highest culture-tendencies. Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. (Judaism in Music)

SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist. “Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World . . . ”

FITZGERALD, F. SCOTT. 20th century American novelist. “Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the passers from intent eyes — eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride, with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York — he could not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people — the little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over with hawks’ eyes and a bee’s attention to detail – they [were Jews.]

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet. “The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer. After a sting as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews, Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of Jews. “The Jew’s hand was ever, like Ishmael’s, against every man but those belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind, whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law contributed to inflame his wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.”

DREISER, THEODORE. 20th century American writer. “New York to me is a scream — a Kyke’s dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5, 1922) ” “Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means — and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)”

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer. “The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel.” (The Outline of History)

“Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people.” (The Anatomy of Frustration)

“A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.” (Letter of November 11, 1933)

Wells was in the habit of referring to KARL MARX as “a shallow third-rate Jew,” and “a lousy Jew” in private correspondence. (Norman MacKenzie, H. G. Wells)

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer. Wednesday, August 23, 1939 “We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.”

Thursday, May 1, 1941 “The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.” (The Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29, 1939 “The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish influence throughout the world.”

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher. “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with . . . How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen? A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden) For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have cause great evil to many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. (“Hebraer,” in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general. “The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes . . .” “Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity . . . “They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.”

“The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it . . . The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.” (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)

“Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.” (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

1). Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his license every year.

2). Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)

DE GAULLE, CHARLES. 20th century French politician. Addressing the Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27, 1967, he observed: “The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people, self-confident and domineering.”

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist. “I saw in ‘the wandering Jew’ the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.” (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: “Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners . . . Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: “It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.”

FRANCO, FRANCISCO. 20th century Spanish statesman. In his victory speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared: “Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day.”

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 – November 1, 1937 “In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” . . . “I implore all of you to be accurate — call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is your reward.”

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate. “The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty — not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.” (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)

HOUSTON STEWART CHAMBERLAIN, world famed author of Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Vol. I, page 337 “The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew! . . . I have searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of finding — naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of the suffering Savior — but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no longer a Jew, but a denier of Judaism. And while we find, even in Mohammed’s Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ “the new birth with the death mask,” which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the Cross he assures us that “the Jews do not require this convulsive emotion for their spiritual improvement,” and adds, “particularly not among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities.” His comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a “dead dog” that lies “buried in a dunghill.” Besides, the Jews have taken care to issue in the latter part of the nineteenth century several editions (naturally in Hebrew) of the so-called “censured passages” from the Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to our scorn and hatred as a “fool,” “sorcerer,” “profane person,” “idolater,” “dog,” “bastard,” “child of lust,” etc.: so, too, His sublime Mother.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s “Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth — and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.”

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England “England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship — a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life.”

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman, wrote in his dairy that in 1946 “Truman was “exasperated” over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added “Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that ‘Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?’ Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.”

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYANT, three times the Democratic Party candidate for President said: “New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous, mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of conscience . . . This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed.”

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895 “The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.”

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician. “One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer. In an interview, he assailed “the Zionist mafia” monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer. “Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race . . .” “The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous — cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.” (Essai sur le Moeurs)

“You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.” (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his ‘anti-Semitism.’ Examen des Quelques Objections . . . dans L’Essai sur le Moeurs.)

“You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.” (“Juif,” Dictionnaire Philosophique)

“I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made . . . But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.” (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)

“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.” (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer. In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER. “Jews! To the heights of your Sinai . . . I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!!” repute.htm


Gina Haspel — Trump’s New Torture Chief?

By TOM LEONARD in New York
for The Daily Mail

She looks like a favourite aunt. But is ‘Bloody Gina’, the woman who could be the next CIA boss, up to her eyeballs in TORTURE?


Is Trump’s prospective new CIA Chief a “sadistic monster”,
as many Washington insiders believe her to be? 

Her name has been excised from file after file, but insiders insist there is no mistaking the identity of the CIA chief whom they dubbed ‘Bloody Gina’.

As ‘chief of base’ of a secret ‘black site’ CIA prison in Thailand, she oversaw a brutal regime in which suspected terrorists were subjected to ‘enhanced interrogation’ techniques, including being waterboarded, hurled against walls and squeezed for hours into coffin-like boxes.

It is claimed she even went to a prisoner’s cell to goad him after he had been tortured, and there is speculation that she once joined in an interrogation.

But while she had the power to stop the interrogation of suspects as they vomited, urinated on themselves in their shackles, or lost consciousness, official records show that she never did.

Those records also show that she was instrumental in the destruction of video tapes that documented the use of techniques now almost universally regarded as torture.

The CIA agent in question is Gina Haspel and, to widespread horror, she may soon be the West’s most powerful spy.

While President Donald Trump has been keen to highlight his wish to appoint the first female boss of the CIA, a growing outcry in Washington has greeted his announcement that, having promoted CIA director Mike Pompeo to Secretary of State, he wants Haspel — Pompeo’s deputy — to take his place.

Republican Senator John McCain, who was himself tortured while a prisoner of war in Vietnam, has described the enhanced interrogations carried out under the George W. Bush administration as ‘one of the darkest chapters in American history’. He was one of the first to demand that Haspel be made to explain the nature and extent of her involvement in it when she faces approval hearings in the Senate.

That dark chapter mentioned by McCain began with the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001, after which the CIA came under intense pressure to find out more about Al Qaeda and any other planned attacks on the U.S.

In 2002, the agency thought they had captured the third-highest ranking Al Qaeda official, a Saudi named Abu Zubaydah, who was a personal aide to Osama Bin Laden.

It was specifically to break down this ‘high-value’ captive that the CIA employed its controversial enhanced interrogation techniques.

He was taken to the first of America’s black sites, an off-the-books CIA prison in Thailand whose existence was never officially acknowledged. Codenamed Cat’s Eye, it became a laboratory for U.S. techniques that the Obama administration later admitted were torture by another name.

Under Bush, however, Haspel was reassured that these interrogation methods were not only legal, but essential in the battle against Islamic extremism.

Haspel, a senior member of the CIA’s counter-terrorism centre, was rapidly appointed Cat’s Eye’s chief of base (or COB) and personally supervised the interrogation of Zubaydah and another important prisoner, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a fellow Saudi accused of numerous acts of terrorism, including helping to plot the bombing of the USS Cole in Aden in 2000.

Government memos reveal Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002 alone, far exceeding the number the U.S. Justice Department had approved. Astonishingly, the process — which simulates drowning — continued even after he started to co-operate.


He had no information to give but was tortured all the same

With the CIA’s video cameras switched on to record any evidence he gave, guards shackled Zubaydah to a gurney and interrogators poured water over his mouth and nose until he began to suffocate.

He told his lawyers: ‘They kept pouring water and concentrating on my nose and my mouth until I really felt I was drowning and my chest was about to explode from lack of oxygen.’

He also said his interrogators repeatedly slammed him against walls, a technique called walling, and kept him confined in a coffin-like box for hours, meaning he was agonisingly unable to move. A 2014 Senate report confirmed he wasn’t exaggerating his torment, noting that he was once waterboarded until he ‘became completely unresponsive, with bubbles rising through his open, full mouth’.

Medical staff had to revive him. The report added: ‘Interrogation techniques such as slaps and wallings were used in combination, frequently concurrent with sleep deprivation and nudity.’

The then 31-year-old Zubaydah pleaded for mercy, saying — correctly, as it transpired — that he knew nothing about the terror group’s plans.

LD offers this relevant block quote from The Atlantic:

“The use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques—including walling, attention grasps, slapping, facial hold, stress positions, cramped confinement, white noise and sleep deprivation—continued “in varying combinations, 24 hours a day, for 17 straight days,” through August 20, 2002. When Abu Zubaydah was left alone during this period, he was placed in a stress position, left on the waterboard with a cloth over his face, or locked in one of two confinement boxes. According to the cables, Abu Zubaydah was also subjected to the waterboard “2-4 times a day … with multiple iterations of the watering cycle during each application.”

The “aggressive phase of interrogation” continued until August 23, 2002. Over the course of the entire 20-day “aggressive phase of interrogation,” Abu Zubaydah spent a total of 266 hours (11 days, 2 hours) in the large (coffin size) confinement box and 29 hours in a small confinement box, which had a width of 21 inches, at depth of 2.5 feet, and a height of 2.5 feet. The CIA interrogators told Abu Zubaydah that the only way he would leave the facility was in the coffin-shaped confinement box.

According to the daily cables from DETENTION SITE GREEN, Abu Zubaydah frequently “cried,” “begged,” “pleaded,” and “whimpered,” but continued to deny that he had any additional information on current threats to, or operatives in, the United States.”

(See HERE)

So all during this time, Gina Haspel showed no moral qualms about subjecting an innocent man to a wide variety of torture techniques over an extended period. And this is the sadistic monster our president is about to appoint as his new CIA chief. It beggars belief. (LD)

In a scene described in a book written by one of the two psychologists who interrogated him, the COB went to his cell and ‘congratulated him on the fine quality of his acting’, telling the prisoner: ‘Good job! I like the way you’re drooling; it adds realism. I’m almost buying it. You wouldn’t think a grown man would do that.’

Although the COB is identified in the book as a ‘he’, investigators believe it was actually Haspel.

The CIA has rejected the most damning reports of Haspel’s behaviour at Cat’s Eye as inaccurate, but hasn’t specified in what way.

Some dozen video tapes were made of the interrogations and stored at the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok.

As concern grew in Washington over the Bush administration’s use of black sites and enhanced interrogation, Haspel reportedly pushed for the tapes to be destroyed, say ex-colleagues.

Declassified CIA cables show her name was on the order to shred them in 2005, although nobody was ever charged with the offence of destroying the tapes, despite the chief lawyers of the CIA and the White House having insisted that they be preserved.

It later emerged that Zubaydah — who is held in the Guantanamo Bay detention centre to this day — was nowhere near as important an Al Qaeda figure as had initially been thought.

And the reason he had provided no useful information while being waterboarded was because he didn’t have any. A debate is now raging in Washington over whether Haspel is a sadistic monster, or a patriot who was simply following orders and acted out of duty.

Her critics say the defence that she was only following orders isn’t a good enough excuse because Haspel zealously went far beyond her interrogation remit.

While a former CIA agent who knew Haspel described her to me as ‘a sociopath’, John Kiriakou — another CIA man who arrested Zubaydah and worked with Haspel in counter-terrorism before blowing the whistle on the waterboarding scandal — said she was ‘always very quick and very willing to use force’.

He described her as one of a group of officers in the agency’s counter-terrorism centre who used torture ‘because they enjoyed doing it’.

He went on: ‘Everybody knew that torture didn’t work…they tortured just for the sake of torture, not for the sake of gathering information. She didn’t have any moral qualms about what she did.’

Zubaydah mentioned in his testimony that a woman whose name he didn’t know once joined in his brutal interrogation. Some believe this could have been Haspel, although Mr Kiriakou, who wasn’t posted to Cat’s Eye, believes it was another female CIA officer.

Ironically, 61-year-old Haspel certainly doesn’t look like the thuggish stereotype of a sadistic torturer. Nor, for that matter, does she remotely resemble TV’s favourite female CIA agent, the glamorous if unstable Carrie Mathison, played by Claire Danes in Homeland.

Rather, she has the appearance of a fresh-faced executive, well-groomed and with a pleasant, open smile. Like members of MI5 and MI6, Haspel — a member of the CIA’s ‘clandestine’ arm — has spent her career under cover.

Such agents are never publicly identified and if they die in service, they are merely honoured with a star that is added to a memorial inside the agency’s Virginia headquarters.

Unsurprisingly, little is known about her personal life. She joined the CIA in 1985 and was reportedly posted successively to Turkey, Ethiopia and central Asia.

Although critics say she should have been jailed for her role at the Thailand black site, she was instead rewarded by being made CIA chief in London — widely regarded in the agency as the most plum foreign post it has to offer.

In Washington, she held a string of senior roles before being appointed deputy director in 2017.

Former colleagues believe she is single and has no children. ‘She was married to her job, a workaholic like the rest of us,’ Mr Kiriakou told me.

While former CIA bosses have praised her ‘uncanny ability to get things done’ and her leadership skills, Mr Kiriakou remembers her somewhat less positively.

‘Many of us called her “Bloody Gina” and we kept our distance,’ he said. He recalled how a CIA psychiatrist had once warned him that women in their line of work would be far more ruthless with him than men if he were ever captured abroad. ‘He told me: “Women who are true believers, they’re the psychopaths.”

Haspel ‘had a reputation as someone who was not afraid to make tough decisions and to do things many of the rest of us would never have done’.

Like other critics of Haspel, he believes she should have been prosecuted rather than promoted. ‘Gina Haspel should be in the dock at The Hague, not in the director’s office at the CIA. She has blood on her hands,’ he said.

He added that at least two — and possibly as many as five — prisoners reportedly died at Cat’s Eye and another black site (one from hypothermia and another from suffocation). Haspel and other senior CIA officers, Mr Kiriakou said, had effectively ‘covered up for murderers’.

If nothing else, he added, her destruction of the interrogation tapes amounts to the criminal offences of obstruction of justice and destroying evidence.

However, Haspel clearly has the approval of Donald Trump, who likes hard-headed military and intelligence types and who has expressed his support for using waterboarding and ‘a lot worse’ to counter terrorism. ‘She’s an outstanding person who I’ve also got to know very well,’ he said this week.



“O most pernicious woman!
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain!”
— Shakespeare, Hamlet

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Source Article from https://www.darkmoon.me/2018/gina-haspel-trumps-new-torture-chief/

Israeli Military Drill Simulates Multi-front War – With Russia Intervening Over Syria

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,886 other followers

Source Article from https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/03/18/israeli-military-drill-simulates-multi-front-war-with-russia-intervening-over-syria/

“Police Urge Austin City Residents To Stay In Their Homes!” After FORTH Explosion This Month! (Video)

FBI agents work the scene of an explosion in Austin, Texas, Sunday, March 18, 2018. At least a few people were injured in another explosion in Texas’ capital late Sunday, after three package bombs detonated this month in other parts of the city, killing two people and injuring two others. Austin American-Statesman via AP Nick Wagner

Oh come on …this is now the forth bomb explosion in the Texas capital ….

These are not some random acts of violence.

And of course, FBI agents raced to the scene (maybe the scene they were covertly involved in?).

These kinds of events make people more fearful and pliable, more insecure and dependent on the controllers and their lapdogs.

I’m wondering how many more of these incidents we will be witnessing and do not believe that the perpetrator(s) will be caught if the intended goal is to create more of these operations….how this dialectic will play itself out only time will tell.

Star-Telegram reports:

The latest blast occurred around 8:30 p.m. Sunday in a suburban neighborhood known as Travis Country in southwest Austin — far from the previous three that were all in residential areas in the eastern part of the city — and investigators didn’t immediately confirm what caused it. But police Chief Brian Manley repeated previously issued warnings for residents not to touch any unexpected packages left at their homes.

“What we have right now is a scene where it is obvious that an explosion has taken place,” Manley said at a hastily organized news conference near the site of the latest blast.

Two men in their 20s were hurt in the latest blast. Police said they were hospitalized with injuries that weren’t life-threatening. It was the fourth explosion to rock Austin in less than three weeks.

The first was a package bomb that exploded at a northeast Austin home on March 2, killing a 39-year-old man. Two more package bombs then exploded farther south on March 12, killing a 17-year-old, wounding his mother and injuring a 75-year-old woman.

Police said all three of those were likely related and involved packages that had not been mailed or delivered by private carrier but left overnight on doorsteps. Manley originally suggested they could have been hate crimes since all the victims were black or Hispanic, but now says that investigators aren’t ruling out any possible motive.

Manley last week urged residents receiving unexpected packages to call authorities without touching or opening them, and police responded to hundreds of calls about suspicious packages but didn’t find anything dangerous.


The latest explosion came hours after authorities raised the reward by $50,000 for information leading to the arrest of whoever is responsible for the first three explosions. It now totals $115,000.

Sunday is the final day of the South By Southwest music festival, which draws hundreds of thousands to Austin every March. It is also the end of spring break for many area school districts, meaning families who were out of town in recent days are returning to a city increasingly on edge.

The explosions occurred far from the main South By Southwest activities, though a downtown concert by hip-hop band The Roots was canceled Saturday night after a bomb threat. Authorities later arrested a 26-year-old man, and the incident did not appear to be related to any previous explosions.



Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ASheepNoMore/~3/CEz2dYSxCHY/

China Is Implementing a ‘Social Ranking System’ Straight out of the Netflix Hit Series Black Mirror

Passengers wait to board trains ahead of the Chinese Lunar New Year, at Nanjing Railway Station in Jiangsu province, China January 31, 2018. China Daily via REUTERS

China to bar people with bad ‘social credit’ from planes, trains

Have you watched the Netflix hit series called Black Mirror? (see video below)

In “Nosedive,” the first episode of Black Mirror’s third season, people rate each interaction they have. A lovely conversation would net both participants a 5, while a fight would result in 1s.

A person’s societal status, as well as related benefits like premium airline bookings and access to certain events and venues, revolves around one’s score. As the title suggests, the protagonist struggles in this type of system, especially if they have an unfortunate case of bad luck.

For those who are not aware of Big Brother’s grip on human affairs, this system is now becoming reality …in China…

And if you’re into conspiracy ….might Black Mirror be some sort of predictive programming for those of us living in the US???

Reuters reports:

China said it will begin applying its so-called social credit system to flights and trains and stop people who have committed misdeeds from taking such transport for up to a year.

People who would be put on the restricted lists included those found to have committed acts like spreading false information about terrorism and causing trouble on flights, as well as those who used expired tickets or smoked on trains, according to two statements issued on the National Development and Reform Commission’s website on Friday.

Those found to have committed financial wrongdoings, such as employers who failed to pay social insurance or people who have failed to pay fines, would also face these restrictions, said the statements which were dated March 2.

It added that the rules would come into effect on May 1.

The move is in line with President’s Xi Jinping’s plan to construct a social credit system based on the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted”, said one of the notices which was signed by eight ministries, including the country’s aviation regulator and the Supreme People’s Court.

READ MORE: Slaughterbots: They Cannot Be Stopped (WATCH) 

China has flagged plans to roll out a system that will allow government bodies to share information on its citizens’ trustworthiness and issue penalties based on a so-called social credit score.

However, there are signs that the use of social credit scoring on domestic transport could have started years ago. In early 2017, the country’s Supreme People’s Court said during a press conference that 6.15 million Chinese citizens had been banned from taking flights for social misdeeds.

WATCH THIS VIDEO: Black Mirror’s S03E01 called ‘Nosedive” Airport scene



Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ASheepNoMore/~3/G2TPBYSklyI/

UK Spy Agencies Warn Power Companies To Brace For Crippling Russian Cyberattack

Millions of Americans believe that Russian agents tried to infiltrate the voting systems of individual states – even though the Department of Homeland Security clarified that it was unable to verify who or what organized the attacks.

Despite this, UK intelligence agencies are warning the National Grid (a major utility company), the National Health Service, the Sellafield nuclear power plant and Whitehall Departments to brace for a potentially crippling cyberattack organized by Russia that could trigger a widespread blackout, following its decision to blame Russia for the nerve-agent poisoning of a former Russian spy, per the Sunday Times  (an attack that’s increasingly looking like a false flag).

Spy chiefs have warned the bosses of Britain’s key power companies to boost their security amid fears of a Russian cyber-attack that could put the lights out.

The National Grid was put on alert last week by officials from the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) – a branch of the signals intelligence agency GCHQ – and given advice on how to improve its defences to prevent power cuts.

NCSC officials, working with the National Crime Agency and MI5’s Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure, have told key organisations that they could face attempts to steal the data of taxpayers and patients or “denial of service” attacks that could shut down their websites.

A Whitehall security source said: “They’re contacting all the critical national infrastructure operators. They’ve been in touch with National Grid with guidance.”

Paul Chichester, the NCSC director of operations, said: “It is absolutely right that we give advice to sectors on defending themselves from cyber-attacks.”

On Monday, Prime Minister Theresa May revealed that former Russian spy, Sergey Skripal and his daughter Yulia, were poisoned with “a military-grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia” known as ‘Novichok’.

The chemical agent, which was identified by the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down, has been used by May to suggest that Russia’s culpability in the attack “is highly likely.”

On these grounds, she claimed that only two scenarios are possible:

“Either this was a direct act by the Russian State against our country. Or the Russian government lost control of this potentially catastrophically damaging nerve agent and allowed it to get into the hands of others.”

And while the British government’s line has been uncritically parroted by the global press with little scrutiny of its plausibility, evidence has emerged that points to a larger pool of possible culprits than just Russia.

* * *

Meanwhile, Russia has already expelled 23 British diplomats – the same number as the UK kicked out a few days earlier – while also ordering the closure of the UK consulate in St. Petersburg and the Moscow British Council, a cultural and educational organization.

The warnings about a Russian cyberattack come just days after the US Treasury followed through with sanctions against two Russian intelligence agencies as well as a Russian troll farm and an associated Russian oligarch that were indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

And they also precede what’s expected to be a flurry of actions to be authorized by May this week to crack down on Russia’s ties with the UK.

May will chair a meeting of the national security council on Tuesday to decide how to respond. Downing Street has drawn up plans to:

  • Pass emergency legislation to make it easier to seize the assets of people who live in Russia but launder their money though London.
  • Strengthen the visa regime to make it harder for Vladimir Putin’s cronies to travel to London.
  • Close a Russian trade outpost in Highgate, north London, which is viewed as a hotbed of espionage.
  • Target the finances of Russian oligarchs living in the UK.
  • Publish a further list of Russian officials to be expelled.

* * *

UK officials are set to keep beating the anti-Russia drum this week, with Foreign Minister Boris Johnson set to meet with NATO Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg. Already this weekend, Ruth Davidson, the Tory leader in Scotland, suggested that the Kremlin-backed television channel RT should be shut down.

“Russia Today exists for the sole purpose of promoting the agenda of Putin’s regime,” she said. “Objectivity is poisoned when state agents pump propaganda into the households of this country.”

Britain will not name the 23 Russian spies it has ordered to leave. But intelligence chiefs are worried Moscow will publish the names of the alleged spies that it has decided to expel – which would render them useless for espionage in other foreign locales.

Of course, it’d be incredibly foolish for Russia to authorize a massive cyberattack in the UK right now while it’s facing so much scrutiny. But that likely wouldn’t stop the UK from reacting by blaming Russia if an attack should happen, regardless of the credibility of any evidence gathered.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ASheepNoMore/~3/5-n2rjqdYBI/

Anonymous: Something Thought to be Impossible is Happening ….

Watch this compelling video …

We are n now living in a completely evil world with a  corrupted system and soon everyone is going to realize their errors to which will be irreplaceable.

The more that man messes with science, the more the ruining of everything not organic, nature-al.

These symptoms of disease are but now humanity trying to play god here.

You’ll notice that these satanic globalists are bringing these atrocities more in the open as they attempt to normalize and gain acceptance of their wickedness….something that they have been doing for eons yet the masses remain ignorant.

It is beyond ridiculous that people are still conforming to the mainstream paradigms after seeing this.

These people are evil.

The Synagog of Satan  …

Ever wonder why so many people go missing every year?

Via Anonymous Official:

You can assist me in keeping this small, independent media site running by supporting A Sheep No More through Donation! Thank You!!!

Patreon https://www.patreon.com/ASheepNoMore

Paypal.me: https://www.paypal.me/ASheepNoMore



Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ASheepNoMore/~3/IeoyOx9f3Fo/

Google’s Search Results For Questions About Parkland Shooting Are Different From Other Search Engines

By John Vibes

Google may be the world’s most popular search engine, but it has also been the subject of a number of accusations in recent years that it is purposefully censoring searches and influencing results. In the case of search results related to the Parkland shooting, that alleged influence is becoming even more apparent.

This week, the staff at The Free Thought Project began testing various keywords related to the Parkland shooting on different search engines, and we noticed that if our search terms were controversial, the first page of Google results was filled with entirely different information than the other search engines. The information showed on Google was often not relevant to our search, and the results always seemed to support the official narrative.

The most striking of these results came when we searched for the words “girl says 3 shooters parkland,” expecting the news footage of an eyewitness from the school saying that there were multiple shooters.

This video did not come up on Google, nor did any articles about the statement that the student made to the news, despite the fact that our search was extremely specific. Don’t be fooled by the top article “Calling B.S in Parkland, Florida,” it is an op-ed promoting gun control.

Oddly enough, when we searched for the same keywords on Yahoo, Bing or DuckDuckGo, each search engine brought up exactly what we were seeking. Try this experiment yourself and see what you come up with. It does not just have to be for this story—if you find other stories and search terms that Google appears to be suppressing, let us know. Below are screenshots from DuckDuckGo and Bing. We did not post Yahoo because their results were identical to Bing.

Google became the most popular search engine on the Web because it connected people with the links that were close to their searches while offering up a wide variety of different sources. But now it is obviously far past time to move onto more trusted platforms.

In the early days of the Internet, search engines and service providers like YouTube acted as a gateway to the world. But over the years the most powerful of these companies have increasingly begun to act as gatekeepers, caving into pressure from the government.

In the last two years, censorship on the Internet has been brought to an all-time high, thanks to “fake news” hysteria and a consistent campaign from the mainstream media to silence dissenting voices during times of tragedy when the official story has come into question—like the recent shootings in Las Vegas or Parkland.

Instead of investigating stories and asking tough questions, the mainstream media simply regurgitate press releases from police and government agencies. Before the Internet gave birth to the alternative media there was only one side to every news story, the official narrative, and for the most part, everyone believed it. Even if news outlets have partisan disagreements about politics, they always sell the basic version of reality, especially when it comes to questioning information handed down from those in authority.

As the alternative media has grown in size and relevance in recent years, there has become a wide range of perspectives for people to choose from, and there is no longer just one side to the story when large news events happen. Now there are many different investigations and theories behind every event—from the brilliant to the insane—leaving it up to the reader to use their own critical thinking when reading this news.

Critics see this as some type of breakdown of reality, where everyone just adopts whatever version of the world that suits their needs. While this is a legitimate problem that does happen to some extent—in the case of online echo chambers and actual fake news—these things are far less dangerous than allowing an all-powerful media cartel to think for us.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL

Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ActivistPost/~3/YV9KIS1ricE/google-search-results-parkland-shooting-different-other-search-engines.html

10 x 5 Reasons Enacting Stricter Gun Control Is Not The Answer

By Cate Schrödinger

1 – We already have some pretty good laws on the books, if we enforced them.

We have gun control! There are already some pretty “common-sense” gun control laws in place. The problem is that they are not enforced very well. Adding more laws that we don’t enforce is not going to change anything. Here are five examples when existing gun control laws have failed due to poor enforcement:


1 Devin Kelley killed 26 churchgoers in Sutherland Springs, Texas in 2017. Under federal law, he should not have been able to purchase a gun, but the Air Force failed to maintain the record that would have prevented it.

2 Virginia Tech student Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 people with a gun at Virginia Tech, although his mental illness should have prevented the purchase. Once again, poor record keeping.

3 Dylan Roof killed 9 nine people in a church in Charleston, South Carolina in 2015. Again, he should have failed the background check but the FBI examiner did not get his record in time.


4 19 states have provided fewer than 100 records of individuals disqualified from gun ownership on mental health grounds.


5 The U.S. government itself let more than 2,000 guns into the hands of criminals through Operation Fast and Furious, allowing guns to be distributed to Mexican cartels.

2 – Criminals don’t care about laws anyway.

Last time I checked, murder was already illegal. Laws are followed by law-abiding citizens, not those who are determined to defy them. Stricter gun control laws will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals, it will just make the rest of us more defenseless. Here are five times a civilian stopped a tragedy from happening with a lawfully-carried gun:


1 Hero Stephen Willeford used his assault rifle to stop the mass murder of 26 churchgoers in Texas in 2017.

2 In 2007, Jeanne Assam stopped assailant Matthew Murray, who had killed four people in a church in Colorado Springs.

3 In 2017, an usher at a Tennessee church used a firearm to stop a gunman who had already killed one and injured six others.


4 An Uber driver in Chicago shot and wounded a gunman who opened fire on a crowd of people.

5 A man shot Warren Edwards, who had opened fire on customers and barbers in a barber shop in Philadelphia

3 – Our outrage over mass shootings is manipulated.

The reason why we are outraged about guns and mass shootings is because there is an agenda to disarm the American population, and our emotions are manipulated, which is easy because gun violence, and especially mass shootings, can be so horrific and tragic. We should be outraged about mass shootings, but we should also be outraged about drone violence, war, the healthcare crisis, the opioid crisis, and other unnecessary deaths. And we should be looking for actual solutions, not allowing ourselves to be manipulated and led down a path toward tyranny.

Mass shootings are a tiny percent of gun homicides, and an even tinier percent of overall gun violence (most of which is suicide), not to mention an even tinier percent of deaths overall. If we are going to generate outrage, let’s aim it thoughtfully. In 2017, 433 people were killed in mass shootings. Compare this with:

  1. Police killed 1,184 people in 2017, far more than in any other civilized country and the fourth year in a row that number was over 1,000.
  2. A 1990 Harvard medical study suggests 150,000 people die annually from doctors’ negligence.
  3. Drug overdoses killed more than 60,000 people in 2016.
  4. At least 165,000 civilians were killed by direct violence in the Iraq war through 2015 alone (the actual number is probably much higher).
  5. Estimates of civilians killed by U.S. drone strikes in the Middle East range widely, but Airwars estimates the civilian death toll to be between 2,300 and 3,400 over a period of just two years.

4 – By the way, the police won’t protect you.

The average police response time for alarm dispatches is about seven minutes, but that varies widely by geographic location, and in many places it may take over an hour. I applaud our emergency service teams – they do yeoman’s work – but they cannot be everywhere at once. Those few minutes may very well be the difference between life and death.

If the police do answer the call, there’s no guarantee they will help either. Here are five examples of police “help” going horribly, horribly wrong:


1    In 2017, Justine Damond was shot and killed by police in Minneapolis after she called 911 to report a disturbance.


2    In 2016, Eugene Craig tried to protect his wife from what he thought were armed intruders into his home. It turns out they were police, conducting a welfare check by kicking the door in.


3    Mark Steven Parkinson, age 65, was gunned down in his home by deputies dispatched to conduct a welfare check on someone else.


4    A 28-year-old man was shot in his home in 2017 when a SWAT team was dispatched based on a false report.


5    This one is hard to watch. The police were called about reports of a “rifle” in a hotel room, which turned out to be a pellet gun used in a pest control business. That didn’t stop them from literally torturing an innocent, unarmed man and then shooting him in cold blood.

5 – All of the people calling for gun control seem to be surrounded by armed guards.

Politicians, Hollywood actors — somehow they feel unhypocritical calling for gun control when they travel with armed escorts and generally have very highly armed security details at their events. Tell them to get rid of their armed guards, and then maybe we’ll talk. You say they are more of a target than the average person? How about wives or girlfriends who are targets of abusive spouses? I am not even going to list them; the instances of an abusive husband or boyfriend stalking and killing his girlfriend/wife/ex-wife, in spite of police involvement, are too numerous to count. Not that I think they should all shoot their stalkers, but in those situations, maybe having a gun and being trained to use it wouldn’t be such a bad thing.

6 – Gun control does not equal safer.

This probably should have been #1 on the list, but I am following the lead of gun control advocates, who always bury it. The rational thing to do would be to examine the facts, looking at areas where strict gun control has been enacted versus areas with looser laws, and how their crime/murder rates are affected. The reason we don’t look at that is because the facts don’t support gun control. Here are ten gun control facts to open your eyes:


1   Washington, D.C. banned guns in 1976, and annual homicide rates skyrocketed. With some of the strictest gun laws in the country, it’s still one of the most dangerous places to live.

2   The vast majority (nearly 99 percent) of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones. Of course; they are an easy target.

3   There is a clear correlation between higher firearm ownership and reduced police killings. A national Association of Chiefs of Police survey found that more than 86 percent of 20,000 police chiefs support concealed carry.


4   Ireland banned firearms in 1972 after having a fairly static homicide rate for years. After the ban, the murder rate shot up for a brief period of time, then dropped back to about its previous level. Since then, it has increased steadily despite the gun ban.

5   Australia: Australia’s gun ban in 1996 had virtually no long-term effect, but there was a small spike immediately following the ban. Same for the U.K.

7 – Law-abiding citizens should be able to have guns.

Never mind that the Bill of Rights says that this is an INHERENT right — not a privilege that can be taken away by the government. Never mind that most people who have guns would NEVER, EVER kill someone except in the direst of circumstances. Never mind that sometimes just having a gun is protection enough.

Gun control isn’t really about controlling guns, which it won’t. It’s about transferring power from the citizens to an elite class that controls the military and law enforcement. A country where only the government gets guns is a totalitarian country of slaves. The Second Amendment was designed to ensure a well-regulated militia; given the encroachment of the massive police state, this does not seem like a good time to give up our guns. The day the military and law enforcement don’t carry guns is the day that I will advocate for a citizenry without guns.

Free citizens are free citizens, and slaves are slaves.

8 – People will not abide by the law.

With laws that are just and clearly benefit the community, most people are happy to abide by the law. Most people don’t murder or steal. But unjust, unfair, burdensome laws tend to see resistance, as we saw with prohibition and as we are seeing with marijuana now. Laws may act as a deterrent, but good luck enforcing any laws that take away Americans’ guns. How far do you want to take it? Door-to-door confiscation, imprisonment, reeducation camps?

On a side note, we are millimeters away from building a blockchain black market in which people will be able to access anything they want, from weapons to drugs to awful things like child pornography. We’d better grow up and find a way to evolve rather than trying to control each other.

On another side note, everything you need to build a working firearm, you can find at Home Depot.

9 – You can’t ban everything that’s dangerous.

Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Yes, that’s trite but it’s true. A person can make a flamethrower out of a lighter and some hairspray; are we going to ban hairspray? Murder can come in oh so many ways, many of them very efficient and extremely available, guns or no. The problem is NOT GUNS. We need to look deeper to solve the actual problem, not just ban stuff.

10 – The problem is deeper than guns.

Our society has become so pathological that people kill themselves daily by overdosing on opioids (an average of one death every ten minutes), and so painful to live in that there are people who would rather commit a massacre than continue to live. People are chronically sick, malnourished, miserable, overworked, over-stressed, addicted, and unhappy; our society is not a fit place to live. Focusing on guns is missing the point. We need to do the real work of building a civilization where people can be healthy, joyful, happy, and — yes — free.

Lastly, here are ten things WE CAN DO NOW that can make us much safer in the long run:

  1. Stop glorifying gun violence.
  2. Deal with mental illness, and look into the connection between SSRIs and violent/suicidal behavior.
  3. Work to close the wealth gap, so people are not so desperate.
  4. Eliminate poverty, so people don’t have reasons to kill or steal from one another.
  5. Value women as more than sexual objects or objects to be abused.
  6. Stop isolating people who are different or struggling; bring them into the fold and help them.
  7. Stop elevating psychopaths to positions of power.
  8. Start thinking for ourselves, rather than being manipulated by a massive media machine.
  9. Stop criminalizing things we don’t like, and look for better ways to deal with our issues.
  10. Treat each other with kindness, respect, and compassion. Start really listening to each other rather than allowing ourselves to be divided.

Airwars drone strike data:


Drone strike estimates:


Cate Schrödinger is a writer and independent researcher out of Portland, Oregon. She is a mother and a yogi, and with deep gratitude is tirelessly devoted to understanding why the world is so f***ed up. And figuring out how to fix it (even though really it doesn’t need any fixing.) You can contact Cate at cateschrodinger@theiamyouproject.com. You can read more from Cate at her blog The I Am You Project, where this article first appeared.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL

Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ActivistPost/~3/3fzJkR0tmxg/10-x-5-reasons-stricter-gun-control-not-answer.html

Killing Diplomacy: Theresa May and Boris Johnson are Sending Britain Over the Edge

Dmitry Orlov
21st Century Wire

There is the famous aphorism by Karl von Clausewitz: “War is the continuation of politics by other means.” This may be true, in many cases, but it is rarely a happy outcome.

Not everybody likes politics, but when given a choice between politics and war, most sane people will readily choose politics, which, even when brimming with vitriol and riddled with corruption, normally remains sublethal. In relations between countries, politics is known as diplomacy, and it is a formal art that relies on a specific set of instruments to keep countries out of war. These include maintaining channels of communication to build trust and respect, exercises to seek common ground, and efforts to define win-win scenarios to which all sides would eagerly agree, including instruments for enforcing agreements.

Diplomacy is a professional endeavor, much like medicine, engineering and law, and requires a similarly high level of specialized education. Unlike these other professions, the successful exercise of diplomacy demands much greater attention to questions of demeanor: a diplomat must be affable, personable, approachable, decorous, scrupulous, levelheaded… in a word, diplomatic. Of course, in order to maintain good, healthy relations with a country, it is also essential that a diplomat fluently speak its language, understand its culture and know its history. Especially important is a very detailed knowledge of the history of a country’s diplomatic relations with one’s own country, for the sake of maintaining continuity, which in turn makes it possible to build on what has been achieved previously. Complete knowledge of all treaties, conventions and agreements previously entered into is, obviously, a must.

Sane people will choose politics over war, and sane (that is, competently governed) nations will choose diplomacy over belligerence and confrontation. An exception is those nations that cannot hope to ever win the game of diplomacy due to an acute shortage of competent diplomats. They are likely to strike out in frustration, undermining the very international institutions that are designed to keep them out of trouble. It then falls upon their more competent counterparts in other nations to talk them off the ledge. This may not always be possible, especially if the incompetents in question can’t be made to appreciate the risks they are taking in blindly striking out against their diplomatic counterparts.

If we look around in search of such incompetently governed nations, two examples readily present themselves: the United States and the United Kingdom. It is rather challenging to identify the last moment in history when the US had a Secretary of State that was truly competent. To be safe, let’s set it as January 20, 1977, the day Henry Kissinger stepped down from his post.

Since then, US diplomatic history has been, to one extent or another, a history of fantastic blunders. For example, as far back as 1990 US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie told Saddam Hussein, “[W]e have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait,” in effect giving the green light to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and setting off the cascade of events that has led to the current sad state of affairs in the region. Another highlight was Hillary Clinton, whose only credentials had to do with a sort of fake noblesse, stemming from her marriage to a former president, and who used her position as Secretary of State to enrich herself using a variety of corrupt schemes.

Among the lower ranks of the diplomatic corps, most ambassadorships went to people with no diplomatic education or experience, whose only qualifications had to do with electoral fundraising on behalf of whoever happened to occupy the White House and other partisan political considerations. Few of these people are able to enter into a meaningful dialogue with their counterparts. Most are barely able to read a programmatic statement of policy from a piece of paper handed them by a staffer.

In the meantime, the UK establishment has been gradually decrepitating in its own inimitable post-imperial fashion. Its special relationship with the US has meant that it had no reason to maintain an independent foreign policy, always playing second fiddle to Washington. It has remained as a US-occupied territory ever since World War II, just like Germany, and, deprived of its full measure of sovereignty, could allow its international organs to slowly atrophy from disuse. The benefit of this arrangement is that it has allowed the collapse of the British Empire to proceed in slow motion—the slowest and longest collapse in the long history of empires.

What little competence there was left gradually drained away in the course of the UK’s temporary dalliance with the European Union, due to end next year, during which most of the rest of UK’s sovereignty was signed away by treaty, and most questions of international governance were relinquished to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. And now, at the end of this long process of degeneration and decay, we have in the person of the Foreign Minister a clown by the name of Boris Johnson. His equally incompetent boss Theresa May recently saw it fit to very loudly and publicly violate the terms of the Chemical Weapons Convention to which the UK is a signatory.

To recap, Theresa May claimed that a certain Russian-cum-British spy living in the UK was killed using a nerve agent made in Russia, and gave Russia 24 hours to explain this situation to her satisfaction. Russia is likewise a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), and had destroyed all 39,967 metric tons of its chemical weapons by September 27, 2017. On that occasion, The Director-General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü, stated: “The completion of the verified destruction of Russia’s chemical weapons programme is a major milestone in the achievement of the goals of the Chemical Weapons Convention. I congratulate Russia and I commend all of their experts who were involved for their professionalism and dedication.” The US is yet to destroy its stockpiles, preferring to squander trillions on useless ballistic defense systems instead of living up to its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Here is precisely what Theresa May did wrong. Under the terms of the CWC, the UK was obligated to provide Russia with a sample of the nerve agent used, along with all related evidence uncovered in the course of the investigation. After that, the treaty gives Russia 10 days to respond. Instead, May provided no evidence, and gave Russia 24 hours to respond. When Russia formally requested to see the evidence, this request was refused. We can only guess at why she refused, but one reasonable supposition is that there is no evidence, because:

• May claimed that the nerve agent was Novichok, developed in the USSR. In order to identify it, the UK experts had to have had a sample of it. Since neither the USSR, nor Russia, have ever been known to export it, we should assume that it was synthesized within the UK. The formula and the list of precursors are in the public domain, published by the scientist who developed Novichok, who has since moved to the US. Thus, British scientists working at Porton Down could have synthesized it themselves. In any case, it is not possible to determine in what country a given sample of the substance was synthesized, and the claim that it came from Russia is not provable.

• It was claimed that the victims—Mr. Skripal and his daugher—were poisoned with Novichok while at a restaurant. Yet how could this have been done? The agent in question is so powerful that a liter of it released into the atmosphere over London would kill most of its population. Breaking a vial of it open over a plate of food would kill the murderer along with everyone inside the restaurant. Anything it touched would be stained yellow, and many of those in the vicinity would have complained of a very unusual, acrid smell. Those poisoned would be instantaneously paralyzed and dead within minutes, not strolling over to a park bench where they were found. The entire town would have been evacuated, and the restaurant would have to be encased in a concrete sarcophagus by workers in space suits and destroyed with high heat. None of this has happened.

• In view of the above, it seems unlikely that any of what has been described in the UK media and by May’s government has actually taken place. An alternative assumption, and one we should be ready to fully test, is that all of this is a work of fiction. No pictures of the two victims have been provided. One of them—Skripal’s daughter—is a citizen of the Russian Federation, and yet the British have refused to provide consular access to her. And now it has emerged that the entire scenario, including the Novichok nerve gas, was cribbed from a US/UK television drama “Strike Back.” If so, this was certainly efficient; why invent when you can simply plagiarize. Watch the clip here:

• This is only one (and not even the last) in a series of murders and assumed but dubious suicides on former and current Russian nationals on UK soil that share certain characteristics, such the use of exotic substances as the means, no discernible motive, no credible investigation, and an immediate, concerted effort to pin the blame on Russia. You would be on safe ground if you assumed that anyone who pretends to know what exactly happened here is in fact lying. As to what might motivate such lying—that’s a question for psychiatrists to take up.

In considering all of the above, healthy skepticism is called for. All we have so far is an alleged double murder, no motive, doubtful means, over 140 million suspects (anyone who’s Russian?), and public statements that amount to political theater. As far as repercussions, there is very little that the UK government can do to Russia. They kicked out a few dozen Russian diplomats (and Russia will no doubt reciprocate); the Royal Family won’t be attempting the World Cup in Russia this summer (not a great loss, to be sure); there are also some vague threats that don’t amount to anything.

But that’s not what’s important. For the sake of the whole world, (former) great powers, especially nuclear ones, such as the US and the UK, should be governed with a modicum of competence, and this show of incompetence is most worrying. The destruction of public institutions in the US and the UK has been long in the making and probably can’t be undone. But the least we can do is refuse to accept at face value what appear to be blatant fabrications and provocations, demand compliance with international law, and keep asking questions until we obtain answers.

Writer Dmitry Orlov is an American author of ten books including, The Five Stages of Collapse. Learn more about his current projects and support his work at Patreon. See more of Dmitry’s work at Club Orlov.

READ MORE SKRIPAL NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Skripal Files


Source Article from http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/03/19/theresa-may-and-boris-johnson-are-killing-diplomacy/

The Salisbury Chemist: False Flags for Newbies

Dmitry Orlov
21st Century Wire

Britain is in a media frenzy over the recent poisoning of the former Russian intelligence service colonel turned British spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, England.

British PM Theresa May demanded that Russia explain itself, claiming that they were poisoned using a nerve agent called “Novichok” (Russian for “Newbie”) that was a product of Soviet biological weapons research. It is no longer produced and the destruction of its stockpiles has been verified by international observers. However, its formula is in the public domain and it can be synthesized by any properly equipped chemical lab, such as Britain’s own Porton Down, which, incidentally, is just an 18-minute drive from Salisbury.

Russia’s Sergei Lavrov

May provided no evidence to back up her claims of Russian complicity in the attempted murder. Russia’s Foreign Ministry has requested that Britain turn over all available evidence to back up its accusation of chemical weapons use (under the terms of the Chemical Weapons Convention Britain must do so within 10 days) but Britain has refused. Therefore, Russia’s FM Sergei Lavrov has announced that Russia will not be responding to such baseless allegations.

An important key to spotting a false flag is that the “knowledge” of who is to blame becomes available before any evidence is in. For example, in the case of the shooting down of Malaysian Airlines MH-17 over Eastern Ukraine, everyone in the West was convinced that “pro-Russian separatists” were to blame even before the means could be established. To date, it isn’t understood how they could have done it given the equipment they had at their disposal.

In this [Salisbury] case, Russia was accused almost immediately, while British FM Boris Johnson was quick to volunteer that Britain should not send its team to the World Cup in Russia this summer, disclosing the real reason behind the assassination attempt.

Is there anything new and different behind this latest provocation? Not really; it seems like a replay of the Litvinenko assassination back in November 2006. The choice of an exotic poison (Polonium 210), the lack of evidence (the British claimed that compelling circumstantial evidence exists but haven’t provided any), and the instantaneous leap to “blame Russia” are all the same. The Russians offered to prosecute whoever is responsible if only the British would provide them with the evidence, but the British have failed to do so.

Giving the British story the benefit of the doubt, let’s see what would compel Russia’s secret services to go after Skripal. In Russia, he was convicted and sentenced for treason, then pardoned and released to the British in a prisoner exchange that included ten Russian spies who had worked in the US, including the rather memorable Anna Chapman [image, left]. It is a very important rule of the spy business that those released in a spy swap are never acted against; if this rule were violated, the resulting bad faith would make spy swaps impossible to negotiate. Thus, if the Russian authorities were to order the hit on Skripal, this would not just be immoral and illegal. That would be neither here nor there, since there are instances where raison d’état obviates the need for such scruples. Worse than that, such behavior would have been unprofessional.

Then there is the question of timing. Russia’s presidential elections will take place in just a few days, on March 18. This is a particularly inopportune time to cause an international scandal. What possible urgency could there have been behind killing a pardoned former spy who no longer possessed any up-to-date intelligence, was living quietly in retirement, and at that moment was busy having lunch with his daughter? If the Russian government were involved in the poisoning, what possible reason could have been given for not waiting until after the election?

The attack on Skripal is by no means an isolated incident; there have been multiple suspicious murders of high-profile Russians within the UK for which no adequate explanation has been given. There is a consistent pattern: a strange murder; an instantaneous leap to “blame Russia”; and an attempt to exploit the incident politically. It would be beneficial to put this incident in context, but that would require a much longer article.

IMAGE: Skripal family reunion (Source: Telegraph)

You would be justified in thinking that none of this makes much sense. Given the dearth of evidence, to make sense of this story we are forced to indulge in a bit of conspiracy theory. However, if a conspiracy theory is what it takes to produce the simplest, most elegant and most internally consistent explanation, then that in itself can be considered as circumstantial evidence for the existence of a conspiracy. My simple and consistent explanation, expressed in a single sentence, is as follows:

Under direction from their colleagues in the US, and closely following a script previously worked out in the Litvinenko case over a decade ago, the British secret services, in close coordination with the British government and the press, poisoned Skripal and his daughter using a nerve agent obtained from Britain’s military research base at Porton Down in order to obtain an excuse to compromise the World Cup games in Russia this summer and also to create a scandal immediately before the Russian presidential election.

This is deplorable, of course, but there is a silver lining to this cloud as far as Russia is concerned: Britain (and, by association, the US) will now have a much harder time recruiting double agents from inside the Russian government, since their recruitment prospects will now know that they will remain vulnerable even if they escape, or are pardoned and exchanged. Clearly, the British consider them disposable and see it fit to kill them in exotic ways, then to exploit the incident for political purposes.

As far as Skripal himself… well, that’s just a really sad story: reputation ruined, life ruined, living in exile, wife dead from cancer, son dead from liver failure, and now this. All for the sake of serving as a warning unto others, which is: Don’t trust the Anglos, for they are devious and without shame.

Writer Dmitry Orlov is an American author of ten books including, The Five Stages of Collapse. Learn more about his current projects and support his work at Patreon. This article was originally published at Club Orlov.

READ MORE SKRIPAL NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Skripal Files


Source Article from http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/03/19/the-salisbury-chemist-false-flags-for-newbies/

Hollywood, DC – Sean Stone Doc. ft. Oliver Stone, Jay Dyer, Greg Palast, Matthew Alford

Part 1

Part 2 

Jay Dyer is the author of the best selling title, Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film from Trine Day. Focusing on film, philosophy, geopolitics and all things esoteric, JaysAnalysis and his podcast, “Esoteric Hollywood,” investigates the deeper meanings between the headlines, exploring the hidden aspects of our sinister synthetic mass media matrix.

READ MORE HOLLYWOOD NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Hollywood Files


Source Article from http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/03/18/hollywood-dc-sean-stone-doc-ft-oliver-stone-jay-dyer-greg-palast-matthew-alford/

Episode #226 – ‘Statecraft for Newcomers’ with Patrick Henningsen & Mike Robinson

Episode #226 of SUNDAY WIRE SHOW resumes on March 18th 2018 as host Patrick Henningsen brings you a very special LIVE broadcast on the Alternate Current Radio Network (ACR) – covering all the top news stories worldwide…


5pm-8pm UK Time | 12pm-3pm ET (US) | 9am-12am PT (US)

This week the SUNDAY WIRE broadcasts LIVE as host Patrick Henningsen is joined in-studio by Mike Robinson editor of the UK Column to discuss this week’s top stories from the US, Europe and beyond. In the first hour we’ll cover the UK’s breaking Russian Spy ‘Novichok’ Affair what it really means and what are the true motivations behind this international incident, and we’ll also read a recent essay by writer Dmrity Orlov called ‘Killing Diplomacy‘. Later we’ll try and connect with SUNDAY WIRE roving correspondent for Culture & Sport, Basil Valentine, to look at how this event will impact East-West relations in the run-up to the much anticipated 2018 World Cup in Russia. Enjoy the show…




Strap yourselves in and lower the blast shield – this is your brave new world…


Download Episode #226

Sunday Wire Radio Show Archives

iTunes Libsyn Spreaker Stitcher Stitcher

Source Article from http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/03/18/episode-226-statecraft-for-newcomers-with-patrick-henningsen-mike-robinson/

(VIDEO) REMEMBER: Whatever Goes Wrong, You Can Always Blame a Russian!

Poll numbers sliding? Having trouble politically or maintaining credibility with the public? Lost an election or a referendum?

No need to fret – just remember: if something has gone wrong in life and you’ve run out of options… blame a Russian.

#ICYMI presents to you a once-in-a-lifetime offer. Buy your very own Russian, and never take the blame for anything again…

READ MORE RUSSIAGATE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Russiagate Files


Source Article from http://21stcenturywire.com/2018/03/18/video-remember-whatever-goes-wrong-you-can-always-blame-a-russian/

Going Underground – Ep. 590: Legendary Noel Edmonds on City Corruption & Dr Alford on Intelligence-Hollywood Collusion

Going Underground – Ep. 590: Legendary Noel Edmonds on City Corruption & Dr Alford on Intelligence-Hollywood Collusion

Going Underground with Afshin Rattansi

In this episode, we speak to legendary broadcaster Noel Edmonds about corruption and fighting the British banking system. Dr Matthew Alford on alleged collusion between the U.S. government and Hollywood. Plus, Jackie Walker performs a scene from her play The Lynching!

LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingund…

View the original video for Going Underground – Ep. 590: Legendary Noel Edmonds on City Corruption & Dr Alford on Intelligence-Hollywood Collusion at youtube.com

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Civil Rights and Privacy, Politics, Television Video & Film.

Tagged with , , , , .

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DarkPolitricks/~3/GwFzVRmRPVc/

Trump Calls Out Comey For Lying Under Oath

Trump Calls Out Comey For Lying Under Oath

Daily Caller
March 18, 2018

President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday that former FBI Director James Comey clearly lied under oath in his testimony before Congress in 2017.

Wow, watch Comey lie under oath to Senator G, he tweeted Sunday morning, When asked have you ever been an anonymous source or known someone else to be an anonymous source ? He said strongly never, no. He lied.

Indeed, it does appear that Comey may have misrepresented the truth during his congressional testimony in 2017. The following is an excerpt from his questioning before Congress:

Director Comey, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?

COMEY: Never.

GRASSLEY: Question two, relatively related, have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?


Read more

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Freedom of Speech, Politics, Prison Planet Articles.

Tagged with , , , , , .

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DarkPolitricks/~3/ETK_FWJ3HXk/

A Lack of Candor: Andrew Mccabe and the War on (Or In) the FBI?

The explanation from Andrew McCabe that he was fired merely due to his staunch support of his former boss and mentor, FBI Director James Comey, and the “Russiagate” investigation,  does not pass the smell test.

Similar to the one that mainstream corporate media is spinning, McCabe’s explanation almost totally ignores the fact that it was the relatively independent Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) and the FBI’s own Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR internal affairs) who recommended firing McCabe for his “lack of candor” on (the totally unrelated issue of) granting improper press access to the Wall Street Journal during ongoing FBI investigations of the Clinton Foundation and Clinton’s emails.

While the exact specifics of McCabe’s “lack of candor” – which McCabe denies – haven’t been released by the IG, it’s my own personal opinion that such official briefing of the press should not necessarily be a fireable offense as long as it’s justified to correct faulty media reporting and was not covertly done for improper political reasons. But technically, firing for “lack of candor” has long been the FBI’s “bright line” policy, ever since former FBI Director Louis Freeh tried to “clean up” the FBI in the mid-1990s when so many agents, including Special Agents in Charge, were caught lying about sex affairs, improper government credit card charges and drunk driving incidents – some amounting to reckless homicides.

But of course, Freeh was rather hypocritical as he was himself involved in several instances of “lack of candor” including appointing his friend, Larry Potts, as Deputy Director. This, despite the fact that Potts had covered up his own role in substituting “rules of engagement” for the FBI’s “deadly force policy” during the Ruby Ridge standoff with (the arguably unconstitutional) “rules” directing the shooting on sight of any armed male.

The cover-up of Potts’ mishandling of Ruby Ridge came to light during the criminal investigations and prosecution of the FBI sniper who had subsequently shot and killed Randy Weaver’s wife while aiming at someone else.  When Pott’s role was revealed, Freeh had to censure and demote his Deputy Director; but even then Potts wasn’t actually fired.


So it may well be that “lack of candor” sets too high a standard that no one, not even the angels, let alone FBI agents and their managing officials can live up to.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ lofty statement that the FBI’s integrity is its brand, may be nice, wishful thinking but like other self-promoting speeches going back to J. Edgar Hoover, it has never rung true based on the hundreds of unethical actions I witnessed or was made aware of.

A number of OPR officials themselves were always getting caught in various unethical, deceitful (and sometimes even illegal) actions, including their long systemic practice of employing “double standards” in recommending disciplinary actions, i.e. top ranking officials received light discipline while lower-ranking agents got far more severe punishments for similar wrongdoing. In 2001, some of the FBI’s internal affairs supervisors became whistleblowers and testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the FBI’s disciplinary “double standards.” Although some remedies were eventually put into place, the IG also had to investigate some retaliatory fall-out.

In any event, McCabe’s calling his firing a “war on the FBI” doesn’t make sense considering it was the FBI’s own internal affairs office that recommended he be fired. (Note that DOJ IG Michael Horowitz was appointed by President Obama in 2012 and the FBI’s OPR is run by a career official originally appointed to that position in 2004 by then FBI Director Robert Mueller.)

Perhaps it would be more apt if McCabe had called it a war inside the FBI (and in Washington as a whole). Could the obvious chaos – some would say “bloodbath” – at all levels of government also be part of the “blowback” from 16 years of waging “perpetual war” (and from attendant war crimes and the internal corruption by which all empires rot)? As author Viet Thanh Nguyen noted about the 2016 election: “That sickness is imperialism… America is an imperial country, and its decay might now be showing. Empires rot from the inside even as emperors blame the barbarians.” Remember how wars have a way of migrating home.

Don’t forget that McCabe’s mentor, James Comey, as Assistant Attorney General had signed off on the Bush-Cheney Administration’s torture tactics.  Special Counsel Robert Mueller (said to be “joined at the hip” with Comey) dutifully looked the other way, as then FBI Director, when the CIA’s torture program was instituted, allowing the atrocities to continue. It should also be recalled that Mueller helped the Bush-Cheney Administration to lie us into the Iraq War.

In early January, 2017 CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, NSA Director Michael Rogers and National Director of Intelligence James Clapper briefed President Obama and President-elect Trump on their “Intelligence Community Assessment” by which their agencies’ “hand-picked analysts” accused Russia of meddling in the election and which also included former MI6 spy Chris Steele’s “salacious dossier” accusing Trump’s campaign of colluding with the Russians.

By prior plan, the three other intelligence directors left Comey alone in the room with Trump for Comey to confront the President-elect with the damning summary of Steele’s dossier (which Comey admitted was not verified) and, as icing on the cake, also warning Trump that these accusations would probably appear soon in the media.

Forgetful Democrat Party loyalists also should be reminded that John Brennan was termed the drone assassination and “kill list” czar (before being named CIA Director). As CIA Director, Brennan was hellbent on covering up and promoting CIA torture.

James Clapper, also not known for candor in having previously misled Congress about the NSA’s massive spying on Americans, has even been reported to be the source of the leak to CNN about the Obama intelligence directors’ January briefing that focused on the Steele dossier. It sure looks like there is plenty “lack of candor” to go around!  And plenty for these officials to continue covering up.  But as Cicero observed hundreds of years ago, “the law falls silent in time of war.” At very least everyone should be wary of partisan media spin since all of these war crimes and other deceitful, illegal actions made possible by the wars are fully bipartisan.

The real problem that most of the mainstream media don’t want to even mention is how unprecedented it was to have both Presidential campaigns under serious criminal investigation in the weeks before the 2016 election! In all fairness, even if these now-fired FBI Directors were trying to do the right thing – which would not be in line with their rather sordid track records – it wouldn’t really be possible to walk that political minefield without a faux pas one way or the other.  Seen in that light, it’s possible to even sympathize a little with any FBI Director when the public corruption at the highest levels in Washington DC has become so bad (and fully bipartisan), that it’s hard to know where to start.

Top Photo | Andrew McCabe listens on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017, during the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on major threats facing the U.S. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

Coleen Rowley is a retired FBI special agent, division legal counsel and law enforcement ethics instructor who testified in connection with the 9-11 Joint Intelligence Committee’s Inquiry, the Senate Judiciary Committee investigation and Department of Justice Inspector General’s investigation, exposing some of the FBI’s pre-9/11 failures, was named one of TIME magazine’s “Persons of the Year” in 2002.

© Consortium News



Source Article from https://www.mintpressnews.com/andrew-mccabe-the-war-on-or-in-the-fbi/239133/

Russia Says UK Lab Could Br Source Of Nerve Agent Used In Spy Attack

A Russian official has suggested that the nerve agent used in the Salisbury spy poisoning could have come from a research laboratory in the UK.

Porton Down could be the source of Novichok, the nerve agent used in the attack on ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter, according to Russia’s EU ambassador Vladimir Chizhov.

Chizhov said Russia had ‘nothing to do’ with the poisoning incident in Salisbury and that Russia did not stockpile the poison.

He added that the Porton Down lab was only eight miles (12km) from the city where the incident occurred.

Metro reports: The government has dismissed his comments as ‘nonsense’.

Mr Skripal, 66, a former MI5 double agent, and his daughter Yulia, 33, remain critically ill in hospital after the nerve agent attack in Salisbury on March 4.

Theresa May told MPs that Porton Down – Britain’s military research base – identified the substance used on them as being part of a group of military-grade nerve agents known as Novichok developed by Russia.

The Russian government has denied any involvement in the attack.

Mr Chizhov’s comments come after a Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman said the UK was one of the most likely sources of the nerve agent, along with the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Sweden or possibly the United States.

Maria Zakharova said a large number of ex-Soviet scientists had gone to live in the West, ‘taking with them the technologies that they were working on’.

Czech foreign minister Martin Stropnicky said the claims were ‘unsubstantiated’ and ‘a classic way of manipulating information in the public space’, while Sweden also ‘forcefully’ rejected the suggestion.

Mr Chizhov told the BBC that Mr Skripal could ‘rightly be referred to as a traitor’ but ‘from the legal point of view the Russian state had nothing against him’.

Asked how the nerve agent came to be used in Salisbury, he said: ‘When you have a nerve agent or whatever, you check it against certain samples that you retain in your laboratories.

‘And Porton Down, as we now all know, is the largest military facility in the United Kingdom that has been dealing with chemical weapons research.

‘And it’s actually only eight miles from Salisbury.’

When asked if he was suggesting Porton Down was ‘responsible’ for the nerve agent in the attack, Mr Chizhov said: ‘I don’t know. I don’t have any evidence of anything having been used.’

The Foreign Office said there was ‘not an ounce of truth’ in his suggestion of a link to Porton Down.

Source Article from http://yournewswire.com/russia-says-uk-lab-could-br-source-of-nerve-agent-used-in-spy-attack/

Russians Reject New World Order As Putin Wins Election By Landslide

Russian citizens reject New World Order as Putin wins election by a landslide

Vladimir Putin won the Russian presidential election by a huge landslide on Sunday, as tens of millions of Russian citizens reject the globalist policies of the New World Order. 

Vladimir Putin will lead Russia for another six years, after receiving a staggering 75% of the vote, according to the central election commission.

Addressing a rally in Moscow after the early results were declared, Mr Putin said voters had “recognised the achievements of the last few years”.

Rt.com reports: Ella Pamfilova, head of the Russian Central Election Commission, has said that there were no major violations during the vote, and that only “minor and local complaints” were received.

Vladimir Putin was first elected to the Kremlin in 2000, and again four years later. Constitutionally barred from serving more than two consecutive terms, he did not run in 2008, the same year presidential terms were extended from four years to six years.

Putin won 63.6 percent of the vote in 2012, and, if the early results are confirmed, he will now stay in his post until 2024, the year he turns 72.

Source Article from http://yournewswire.com/russians-reject-new-world-order-putin-win/

Edward Snowden: Facebook Is A Reckless Surveillance Company

Edward Snowden calls Facebook a surveillance tool

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has blasted Facebook following the suspension of Cambridge Analytica, calling the social media giant a “reckless surveillance company.” 

Facebook accused the data analytics firm of improperly harvesting data from millions of Facebook users, but Snowden lashed out saying the blame lies squarely on Facebook.

Washingtonexaminer.com reports: “Businesses that make money by collecting and selling detailed records of private lives were once plainly described as ‘surveillance companies,’” Snowden said. “Their rebranding as ‘social media’ is the most successful deception since the Department of War became the Department of Defense.”

“Facebook makes their money by exploiting and selling intimate details about the private lives of millions, far beyond the scant details you voluntarily post,” Snowden said earlier in the day. “They are not victims. They are accomplices.”

Cambridge Analytica on Saturday denied any wrongdoing, issuing a statement that said the firm “fully complies” with Facebook’s terms of service,

The ensuing uproar has prompted at least one lawmaker, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., to call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, reportedly asked Cambridge Analytica last fall to surrender emails from any of its employees who worked for the Trump campaign. The firm complied to the request.

Facebook has already taken heat for spreading “fake news” during the election and promised changes.

Last year Facebook handed Mueller its findings regarding Russian Facebook ads, revealed when the company announced $100,000 was purchased for ads from June 2015 to May 2017 by a Russian “troll farm” called the Internet Research Agency, which has promoted pro-Russian propaganda. The money was connected to approximately 3,000 ads and 470 “inauthentic accounts and pages.”

Mueller later indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for meddling in the 2016 presidential election, those who were part of the Internet Research Agency.

Snowden was granted asylum in Russia back in 2013 after he leaked secret information from the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs and has been there ever since.

Source Article from http://yournewswire.com/edward-snowden-facebook-surveillance/

Flight MH370 Found With Eerie Black Box Recording: “SOS, They Are Not Human”

Flight MH370 found covered in bullet holes

Images have emerged of the wreckage of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, just hours after a Black Box recording surfaced featuring an eerie message.

Google Earth pictures show the outline of the plane covered in bullet holes under the sea just north of Mauritius.

The discovery comes just hours after a Twitter user received a coded voicemail which experts claim to be a recording from inside the plane.

The message was in military codesign, which translates to: “Danger SOS it is dire for you to evacuate be cautious they are not human sos danger SOS.” The eerie voicemail also gave a series of numbers.

Users started doing their investigations on the meaning behind the “series of numbers.” The numbers when used as coordinates, pointed to a location near Malaysia. Digging deeper, it revealed that it was within the area in the radar where flight MH370 was last seen.

The Sun reports: Australian amateur crash investigator Peter McMahon has spent years poring over NASA and Google Maps images since the plane disappeared in the Indian Ocean four years ago and claims he now thinks he has found it.

He believes the aircraft is 10 miles south of small islet Round Island – an area not included in the search operation by experts.

Mr McMahon said he sent his findings to the Australian Transport and Safety Bureau, which confirmed it could be the missing craft.

But he claims they were then told by US officials to stick to the assigned area of the Indian Ocean.

Could this be part of the front cabin of missing MH370 in waters south of Rodrigues Island?Mr McMahon, 64, told Daily Star Online: “Four Americans were sent to Australia to oversee the findings of MH370.

“They have made sure that all information received has been hidden from the public, even our government – but why?”

He said authorities “do not want it found as it’s full of bullet holes, finding it will only open another inquiry.”

According to reports, along with the main section, Mr McMahon claims to have found part of the front cabin in waters south of Rodrigues Island, also near Mauritius.

Mr McMahon, a mechanical engineer, as spent 25 years working on crash investigations.

Search teams have never found the bodies of the missing passengers and crew.

Earlier this year Malaysia’s government approved US-company Ocean Infinity to dispatch a vessel to search more than 9.000 sq m of Australian waters for the missing Boeing 777.

Its exact location has never been known.

Debris was found by volunteers clearing a beach in St Andre, Reunion in 2015 and Australia released satellite imagery in 2017 showing 12 objects floating near the suspected crash site.

Source Article from http://yournewswire.com/flight-mh370-black-box-sos/

Russian Ambassador: UK Lab Responsible For Releasing Nerve Agent

Russian ambassador accuses UK lab of secretly releasing nerve agent

Russia’s EU ambassador has accused a UK research laboratory of secretly launching the nerve agent attack on an ex-spy and his daughter last week.

Vladimir Chizhov told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that Russia had “nothing to do” with the poisoning in Salisbury of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.

BBC News reports: He said Russia did not stockpile the poison and that the Porton Down lab was only eight miles (12km) from the city.

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson described the claims as “satirical”.

Retired military intelligence officer Mr Skripal, 66, and Yulia, 33, remain critically ill in hospital after being found slumped on a bench in Salisbury city centre on 4 March.

UK Prime Minister Theresa May has told MPs that Porton Down – Britain’s military research base – identified the substance used as being part of a group of military-grade nerve agents known as Novichok developed by the Soviet Union.

Chemical experts arriving

Mr Johnson told the Marr Show that Russia’s reaction to the incident “was not the response of a country that really believes itself to be innocent”.

He said the UK had evidence that Russia, within the last 10 years, had been developing and stockpiling Novichok, as well as investigating the delivery of nerve agents for the purpose of assassination.

He also said experts from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) would arrive in the UK on Monday to test samples of the nerve agent.

The results are expected to take a “minimum of two weeks”, the Foreign Office added.

Mr Chizhov, when asked how the nerve agent came to be used in Salisbury, said: “When you have a nerve agent or whatever, you check it against certain samples that you retain in your laboratories.

“And Porton Down, as we now all know, is the largest military facility in the United Kingdom that has been dealing with chemical weapons research.

“And it’s actually only eight miles from Salisbury.”

But pressed on whether he was suggesting Porton Down was “responsible” for the nerve agent in the attack, Mr Chizhov said: “I don’t know. I don’t have any evidence of anything having been used.”

He said a number of scientists who claim to be responsible for creating some nerve agents “have been whisked out of Russia and are currently residing in the United Kingdom” but no stockpiles of chemical weapons had left the country after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

He added that there were “no stockpiles whatsoever” of nerve agents left in Russia.

Russia ‘manipulation’

Mr Chizhov’s comments come after a Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman said the UK was one of the most likely sources of the nerve agent, along with the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Sweden or possibly the United States.

Maria Zakharova said a large number of ex-Soviet scientists had gone to live in the West, “taking with them the technologies that they were working on”.

Czech foreign minister Martin Stropnicky said the claims were “unsubstantiated” and “a classic way of manipulating information in the public space”, while Sweden also “forcefully” rejected the suggestion.

Chemist Vil Mirzayanov, who revealed the existence of Novichok in the 1990s and later defected to the United States, said he was convinced Russia created the substance used in the attack.

He told the BBC: “Russia is the country that invented it, has the experience, turned it into a weapon. This is the country that has fully mastered the cycle.”

On Saturday, the Russian foreign ministry said UK staff would be expelled from Moscow within a week, in response to Britain’s decision to expel 23 Russian diplomats.

It also said it would close the British Council in Russia, which promotes cultural ties between the nations, and the British Consulate in St Petersburg.

‘Unpredictable and aggressive’

The UK foreign secretary will meet his EU counterparts and Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg for talks in Brussels on Monday.

Mr Stoltenberg said he expected the response to Russia to be reassessed at July’s Nato summit, telling German media the Salisbury attack followed a pattern of Russia “becoming more unpredictable and more aggressive”.

Theresa May said the UK government would consider its next steps “in the coming days, alongside our allies and partners”.

Labour shadow attorney general Shami Chakrabarti reiterated Labour’s position that the incident was either a “loss of control” by the Russian state or a “malevolent directed attack”.

And John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, said Labour had given a “constructive critique” in response to the incident which others “had misread”.

He told ITV’s Peston on Sunday: “We support exactly what the prime minister said and we condemn Russia for this, condemn them.”

Source Article from http://yournewswire.com/russian-ambassador-uk-lab-nerve-agent/

Rights group says 2017 was the worst year in Gaza’s history

Director of Al-Mezan Centre for Human Rights said on Sunday that 2017 was the worst year in the history of the Gaza Strip in terms of political, economic, cultural, social and health conditions.

Issam Younis told journalists in the besieged territory that the coming days would be “worse” if the Israeli siege remains in place and the Palestinian division is not ended.

Younis called for the international community to put pressure on Israel to abide by international law and lift the 11-year-old siege on Gaza.

He also called for the Palestinian Government of National Accord to stop its punitive measures against the people of Gaza, including forcing its employees in the territory into early retirement, slashing up to 50 per cent of salaries and reducing supplies of electricity, medicines and medical equipment.

According to the human rights official, the number of Gazans suffering psychological disorders increased by 21 per cent in 2017 compared with 2016, and the rate of those who are consulting psychiatrists increased by 69 per cent during the same period.

Meanwhile, the marriage rate decreased by 10.8 per cent and families which are run by women increased by 9.5 per cent.

In addition, field researcher Mohamed Abu Jray said that the Palestinians in Gaza are currently in urgent need of 102,000 residential apartments.

Around 24,000 of the apartments destroyed during Israel’s wars against civilians in the enclave between 2008 and 2014 still need to be rebuilt.

Indeed, only around 53 per cent of the houses completely destroyed by the Israeli occupation during the last offensive in August 2014 are suitable for human habitation.

With regards to the economic crisis, Centre staff pointed out that exports from Gaza decreased to their lowest level ever, and estimated monthly losses resulting from the siege amount to $16 million.

Unemployment among young people, meanwhile, has reached 60 per cent; among women the figure is 85 per cent.

Almost 1,000 acres of agricultural land has been damaged due to Israel’s use of poisonous pesticides and the lack of a reliable electricity supply for irrigation purposes.

Source Article from http://daysofpalestine.com/post/10965/rights-group-says-2017-was-the-worst-year-in-gaza’s-history

Netanyahu, his family to be investigated over corruption charges

Israeli media predicts that the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to be investigated along with his wife and eldest son Yair over corruption Case 4000.

The investigations over Case 4000 revolve around facilitations offered by Netanyahu to the businessman Shaul Elovitch, the owner of the news site Wallah, in return for favourable media coverage.

Last month Israeli police recommended that Netanyahu be indicted on charges of bribery and breach of trust in relation to allegations referred to as Case 1000 and Case 2000.

Case 1000 is related to charges of receiving valuable gifts from international billionaires, including expensive cigars, pink champagne and jewellery for his wife.

Meanwhile, Case 2000 is related to secret talks with the publisher of the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronothin which Netanyahu requested positive favourable coverage in return for damaging the pro-Netanyahu Israel Hayom.

Sources close to the investigators expected that Sarah would be indicted, Quds Press reported, noting that that she had been previously indicted on charges of using some $100,000 of state funds to pay for outdoor furniture and electrical work for the Netanyahu’s private home in Caesarea.

Source Article from http://daysofpalestine.com/post/10964/netanyahu-his-family-to-be-investigated-over-corruption-charges

Extremist settlers spray-pain racist graffiti in Jerusalem

A group of extremist Israeli Jewish settlers known as ‘Price Tag’ spray-painted on Monday night racist graffiti on cars and homes of Palestinians in Jerusalem neighbourhood of Hizma.

Local sources said that residents of Hizma woke up to find car tyres slashed, and slogans spray-painted on to vehicles and walls.

The Hebrew-language slogans included: “The Arabs of Jerusalem are terrorists, expel or kill them.. Let us kill with them.. There is no place in Israel for foreigners and the enemies of God.. God is our king”.

Israeli occupation police said the incident was under investigation, but at the time of writing, no suspects had been arrested.

Jewish Israeli settlers and ultra-nationalist extremists often target Palestinians in so-called ‘Price Tag’ attacks, in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and within the Green Line.

These attacks typically take the form of graffiti, vandalism and damage to property, but can also entail physical assaults leading to injury or even fatalities.

Source Article from http://daysofpalestine.com/post/10963/extremist-settlers-spray-pain-racist-graffiti-in-jerusalem

It Begins: Florida Police Now Confiscating Guns From People With No Due Process

By Matt Agorist

Broward, FL — In what’s being called the first gun confiscation of its kind in Florida, police have taken four guns and a couple hundred rounds of ammunition from a 56-year-old Lighthouse Point man. The man was not tried, had not committed a crime, and the guns were solely removed because “experts” deemed him a threat.

The guns and ammunition have been temporarily removed from the man under the state’s new “risk protection” law, which is also sometimes called “red flag” legislation, Lighthouse Point City Attorney Michael Cirullo confirmed, according to the Sun-Sentinal.

“We know it’s the first case of its kind in Broward County and we think it’s the first one in Florida, under the new law,” Cirullo said. “Up until the introduction of this law last week, there was no process for us to protect the public in this kind of situation.”

In Florida, prior to passing the new gun control law, people deemed psychologically unfit could be involuntarily hospitalized under what is called the Baker Act. During this involuntary admission to a hospital, the person is evaluated to determine if they are a risk to themselves or others.

Only after they had been psychologically evaluated and deemed a threat could the government then move in to temporarily disarm them. Now, however, this tiny bit of due process is no longer necessary and “experts” can simply deem someone a threat and take their guns.

Although the 56-year-old man was subsequently Baker Act-ed, his guns were taken before this happened.

To illustrate the insidious nature of Florida’s new bill and its rights-violating implications, prior to the new legislation, if police would have done what they did to this 56-year-old man—taken his guns with no due process—they would be fired and fined up to $5,000.

It is important to note that this man was certainly acting strangely and, according to the Sun-Sentinal, he told officers he “was being targeted and burglarized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and a neighbor who lives in (his) building,” the judge wrote in his order. “(He) could not describe the neighbor but stated that the neighbor ‘shape shift, he can change heights and I’m not sure where he comes from’ and ‘to be honest, he looks like Osama Bin Laden.’”

He also turned off all of his power to the apartment he lived in. By all means, he was acting very strangely. However, he still deserved due process.

It will now be up to the man to prove that he is healthy enough to ever be able to get his guns back again.

To be clear, no one here is advocating for people determined to be mentally unfit to be able to possess firearms. However, they need to be determined to be mentally unfit before they lose their rights.

This law was a reaction to the shooting in Parkland, however, it is important to point out that there were already laws on the books that should’ve stopped Nikolas Cruz from ever getting a gun. Citing Cruz as the reason for advocating the removal of due process, the anti-gun activists are claiming he should’ve had his guns taken which would have prevented the tragedy. Sadly, however, they are ignoring the fact that he was accused of multiple felonies—and should’ve never been able to purchase a gun in the first place—but law enforcement failed to act on any of it.

In Florida, if a person making death threats intends for the victim to fear for her safety, specifically fearful of death or bodily harm, it is considered a credible threat under the law, which changes the crime from stalking, a first-degree misdemeanor, to aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. Cruz was reported at least 4 times for this very crime before he bought his AR-15 and police did nothing.

Florida’s law also mirrors another due process-removing law that was recently used in Washington state to remove a man’s guns.

As TFTP reported earlier this month, there is a law on the books known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order or ERPO, which went into effect in June of 2017. This law is used when a person is considered an “extreme” threat as reported by police and family members. An ERPO must be approved by a judge and only after this person is proven to be a danger to themselves or others can police move in to confiscate their weapons.

“We now have to go to someone’s house and knock on the door and say, ‘We’re from the government. Can we have your guns?’” Seattle police Sgt. Eric Pisconski told KIRO Radio’s Dave Ross. “That can get very dangerous.”

While touted as a necessary tool for police, an ERPO and Florida’s new law both remove due process as the person who is accused of being mentally unstable does not have to be present and gets no chance of facing their accuser.

To those who may be in favor of such laws, consider the following: There is no way to stop an estranged spouse from calling police repeatedly and telling them their ex is threatening to cause harm to others. While the man in Florida had his guns taken for being psychologically unfit, the man in Seattle simply open-carried a pistol and looked out of windows and his guns were taken because his neighbors thought it was strange.

Anyone, any time, now has the ability to claim someone else is a threat and have police take their guns. One does not need to delve into the multiple ‘what if’ scenarios to see what sort of ominous implications arise from such a practice. What’s more, police now have the power to deem you a threat at any time and legally disarm you—due process be damned.

This is the exact scenario that Donald Trump advocated for in February. Last month, notorious gun-grabber Senator Dianne Feinstein, sat next to Donald Trump and likely salivated over his remarks as he called for the removal of due process and to “take the guns first.” Now, police are doing just that.

To those that support the removal of due process under the ostensible notion that it would make you safer, you would do well to remember history before you or someone you know finds yourself subject to these very laws.

This article originally appeared on The Free Thought Project.

Source Article from http://www.renegadetribune.com/begins-florida-police-now-confiscating-guns-people-no-due-process/

Follow the Fake Blood in the 2015 San Bernardino Shooting Hoax

Battery Makers Descend on Australia, Canada Cobalt Developers

Battery Makers Descend on Australia, Canada Cobalt Developers

March 18th, 2018

Via: Reuters:

Nervous Asian battery makers are turning to early-stage cobalt projects in Australia and Canada to lock in supplies of the critical battery ingredient ahead of expected shortages as demand for electric vehicles revs up.

Mine developers say interest from Japanese and Korean firms is particularly strong as they compete with rivals from China, which has built deep supply chain ties with the Democratic Republic of Congo, the world’s top producer.

The central African country accounts for nearly two-thirds of global cobalt output and production is set to rise despite concerns over the use of child miners and rising royalties.

“We are starting to see the first signs of an arms race to secure long term cobalt supplies,� said Joe Kaderavek, chief executive of Australia’s Cobalt Blue.

“With over 85 percent of new global cobalt supply over the next decade coming from Africa, in a region where the Chinese have entrenched relationships, the Korean and Japanese cobalt processing industries are very focused upon Australian and Canadian projects.�

Related: Cobalt to be Declared a Strategic Mineral in Congo




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=52530

Intel: ‘Partitions’ in New Chips Will Correct Design Flaw that Created Spectre and Meltdown

Intel: ‘Partitions’ in New Chips Will Correct Design Flaw that Created Spectre and Meltdown

March 18th, 2018

Via: GeekWire:

After security researchers were able to exploit design flaws in modern processors that lay undetected for up to 20 years, Intel said it would redesign future chips to correct those flaws, and on Thursday it provided a little more information about how that will work.

Starting with the Cascade Lake version of its Xeon server processors later this year, Intel will incorporate “protective walls� in its hardware that prevent malicious hackers from using speculative execution techniques to steal private information from the secure part of the processor. These fixes will also ship with the PC version of the Cascade Lake chips, but the tech industry has been much more concerned about the effect of these design flaws on server processors running in data centers and cloud vendors.




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=52527

By 2019 Every New Ford Will Have 4G LTE Connectivity for Over-The-Air Updates

By 2019 Every New Ford Will Have 4G LTE Connectivity for Over-The-Air Updates

March 18th, 2018

Tesla has been doing this for years, and it’s very disturbing. Of course, the justification is that changes can be made to the car to fix things over the air, without the customer having to bring the car in for servicing. I get all of that. But many people don’t realize that the vehicles are also transmitting imagery from multiple video cameras back to Tesla. The new Model 3 has a driver facing camera inside the car!

*pfft* you say. The number of vehicles Tesla is selling amounts to a noise level phenomenon.

But Ford… That’s huge.

My guess is that virtually nobody will be discouraged by these and many other privacy concerns, never mind the potential health issues. While you and I probably won’t ever buy such a car, just about everyone else will. This means that even those of us who refuse will be swept up in the surveillance networks that these vehicles will create.

Via: Ars Technica:

Ahead of this month’s New York International Auto Show, Ford released some info about its plans to adapt to the changing world of transportation. The Blue Oval says it’s “going all-in on hybrids,” including versions of the F-150 truck and Mustang sports car. The automaker is also readying six new battery electric vehicles (BEVs) by 2022, with the first due in 2020, and adding more performance versions of its SUV line up. Additionally, by the end of 2019, every new Ford will have 4G LTE connectivity, and the company is developing a new cloud platform that will deliver over-the-air updates.




Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source Article from http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=52525

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes