GOD cursed the Jews out of Jerusalem for life, for practising Satanism. Jesus Christ tried to preach the word of God, but they crucified him for it.

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D. “The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”

ONCE WE UNITE We can stand up against those that keep seeking to divide us, with false news, and staged terrorist attacks. Together we can stop working for them, stop paying taxes, bills, fees, fraudulent debt etc. The end of the fiat currency that is used to enslave us begins. No more slavery, debt poverty terrorism illness evil and control e.t.c.

REAL MUSLIMS are never ever shown on TV News networks.  The Muslims you see on TV are the Jews dressed as Muslims, defaming them, to spread racism and hate among us. Wake up and stop hating false enemies that the Jews invent for us to focus on.

OUR NATURE IS SOVEREIGN (we are born free) and so, obviously, God wants us to be liberated from earthly rulers.

Jews were behind the Crucades, Ku Klux Klan, Spanish Inquisition, killing millions of real Christians, in the name of God, hiding behind the Roman Catholic Church (Vatican) spreading Terror... just like they are now doing to the Islamic religion.

JUDAISM = ZIONISM today, started way back in 740bc when the Amalek Edomite Khazarian Turks (now called JEWS), converted to Judaism for political reasons. A stolen identity and history, now needs a name to become complete, so the term "Jew" was invented in 1770. All history and so called "holy books" were re-written to accomodate the lies, to create the Satanic Jew... which has nothing to do with Israelite Hebrews.

HATE CRIMES. Today, the whole world already knows that U.S.A, England and Israel (Rothschild & Co.) plans attacks and wars, using proxy regimes in every country, (so no one blames the Jews) tying them to the dates of Jewish holidays. It’s been noticed that not only terrorist attacks and military operations are planned on Jewish holidays, but also carrying out those terrorist attacks is planned so that the funerals from the attacks would fall on the feasts of the Jews

THE AGENDA: To destroy Christianity, just as they have destroyed empires, nations, heterosexual identities and nuclear families. The agenda is to strip people of power, control, unity, identity and health, leaving us defenceless in the face of a Jewish One-World Tyranny.

JUDAISM = SATANISM is the only religion that have sex (thrusting their pelvis) when they pray to Sex Goddess Shekinah. Jews today continue to murder Christian and non-Jewish children to use their blood in Jewish rituals and holidays

The invention of the Muslim Terrorist is the latest invention by the Jews, to spread fear and dismantle governments that are not yet puppets of the Jews...or have decided to stop serving the Jews.. justifying raping the World, and slaughtering billions of innocent genuine semite and gentile families in every country for power and control annually... under the illusion of Freedom, Democracy, War on Terror, or anything else that can justify their invasions and mass murders for their 2 horned God.

Jewish Rabbi claims Islam is Israel's broom
"We control Islam, and we'll use it to destroy the west."

1.PROBLEM 2.REACTION 3.SOLUTION.

The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Problem, Reaction, Solution, is a Jew conjuring trick within their forever wandering diaspora in order to play the victim, and influence global changes in laws to protect all their historic and contemporary lies ……Who still falls for this old Yiddish trick manipulating policy changes to hide and protect Jewish crimes, acting out Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution against the gentile, changes which gives (((them))) immunity when hiding the truth.

Jews killing Christian Arabs again for their 2 horned God

Everyone was talking about Jesus! But when it came time to speak up for him in public, no one said a word. All were afraid of the Jews. Fear can stifle our witness. Although many people talk about Christ in church, when it comes to making a public statement about their faith, they are often embarrassed. Jesus says that he will acknowledge us before God if we acknowledge Him before others.

All 'Jews' today are the Khazars (converts) and Edomites, some call them the Khazarian Mafia (KM) hellbent on a World Government, as was the ruling Jewish class in the times of Jesus. Herod was an Edomite, after Esau ( Malachi 1: 3 ; Romans 9:13 ), not Jacob Israel. These Jew Fraudsters believe themelves to be Israelites (Hebrews) or from the royal tribe of Judah, claim the Bible Consignor gives themselves mandate to rule the whole world ( Psalm 2: 6-9 , Psalm 2: 10-11 , Deuteronomy 20: 10-14 , Deuteronomy 20 : 12-17 , Isaiah 60: 5 , 60: 10-11 , 60:12 , 60: 14-16 ,Psalm 2: 8 ; ), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah, most of the apostles were Israelites, only one of them was Jewish; Judas. The first time Jews are Mentioned in the Bible, is in II Kings 16: 6105: 44 ; 111: 6 ). Jesus was a Galilean or resident of Galilee ( Matthew 26:69 ; John 7:41 (and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war with the Jews and drave the Jews from elathane. The 'Jews' in 'Jesus' time were Edomites/Turkic Mongols/Khazars/Amalak/Gog/Magog. Edom or Edomite had BEEN translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated IDUMAEANS-Judean into Iewes. The first "Jews" were Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite.Source

Judaism says to kill Christians

Judaism says to kill Christians

 

Related Posts
“Do you think Judaism will ever recover from having been hijacked by Zionism?” a friend
Zionism Contradicts Judaism New York historian, journalist, and lecturer, Alfred M. Lilienthal, was the leading 20th
  January 22, 2019 "Some may call it Communism, but I call it what it
By looking to the Jewish religion as the source of Israeli cruelty, Walker is making
Karl Marx wrote:  "The Jew emancipated himself ... by making himself master of the money-market...

Hits: 533

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit and used her to train their dogs

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit and used her to train their dogs

israel defence forces stole a pregnant donkey from a Palestinian family in Salfit, and used her to train their dogs.

This was posted on Facebook, directly by the Christian Palestinian victims.

Related Posts
June 11, 2019 By Eoin Higgins One of the key fears that critics of mass
"The study of [true] philosophy consists in knowing not what men have thought, but WHAT IS
By Jason Hickel Source Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, and his wife,
How Britain's Royal Jews stole $45 trillion from India And lied about it. by Jason

Hits: 659

Jewish Sharia Law

Jewish Sharia Law



The more I look at Judaism, the more I see that Islam is a just a clone of Judaism.

And we can see why Jews keep bragging why their crime rate is so low — they just don’t report the crime!

From a rare New York Times article, one only has to substitute “Muslim” for “Jew”, “mullah” for “rabbi” and “Sharia” for “Beth Din”, to see that Islam and Judaism are closely tied in Sharia law tradition.

    • Ultra-Orthodox Jews [have] long [been] forbidden to inform on one another without permission from the rabbis who lead them…

 

    • Members of this close-knit community, who refer to themselves as the “haredim,” meaning those who fear God, reject modern secular culture and keep strict control over what they consider internal affairs.

For centuries, disputes involving children, marriage and business have been decided by rabbinical courts called beth dins, which do not report their findings to the secular authorities, even when they judge someone guilty.

    • Taboos codified long ago during times of persecution discourage community members from informing on other Jews; violations can result in ostracism.

 

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Is the Judiac institution of Beth Din nothing more than Islamic Sharia Law?

Jewish Lawyers screw Christian men in secular courts,
get their own divorce in Jewish courts

While American Christian men are being taken to the cleaners by Jewish lawyers, Jewish lawyers have their own divorce proceedings done outside the judicial system they work for.

Their divorce and their child protective services are done in a Rabbinical Court called a beth din.

Perhaps what is good for Jews would be good for Christians in place of the plague of “no-fault” divorce. Marriage Arbitration in one’s Church would prevent many needless broken homes and their resulting broken children.

Jewish media-Scribes attack without worries

And from this same New York Times article, one can deduce why Jewish media-Scribes have been able to impute scurrilous accusations against Catholic Church priests without anyone being able to accuse them of hypocrisy, as in the Rabbi child molestation abuses which are hidden from public view.

Again, because the serious and heinous crimes by Jews are not being reported to the proper authorities, Catholic priests become prey to these killers.

We are not talking about the Jewish religious crime of working on the Sabbath not being reported — we are talking about the religious and criminal crime of child abuse NOT being REPORTED.

    • Now, a growing number of haredi Jews in Brooklyn say they do not think they can get justice from the rabbinical courts, which in several high-profile cases have exonerated people who were later criminally convicted of child abuse. And although some advocates for victims contend that the district attorney has been too accommodating of the rabbinical hierarchy — a charge that Mr. Hynes denies — more families are turning to his office for help.

 

    • Prosecutors say that since last year 40 minors have agreed to testify about abuse in court, if necessary. And Mr. Hynes’s office has been asked for advice by prosecutors with jurisdictions that include other large haredi enclaves in the Northeast.

 

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Indeed, Survivors for Justice founder Ben Hirsch confirms that there is abuse of children in the Jewish community and keeping it a secret only helps abusers of Jewish children.

    • Children in haredi families are no more or less likely to suffer sexual abuse than others, according to several recent studies. But Ben Hirsch, founder of Survivors for Justice, a New York group whose members include haredi Jews molested as children in communities nationwide, said

the clandestine handling of molestation cases had kept leaders from dealing with the problem and made it easier for predators.

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

This site has said so much in its previous article — Rabbi Rap Sheet —

“Religious Sensitivities”

For Christian child abusers, the abuser loses his job — because he is sitting in prison! Then after serving his time in prison, he has the additional punishment of the Megan’s Law “Scarlet Letter” hung around his neck when he has to register as a child molester with the authorities reporting where he lives to one and all.

Not so with Jewish child molesters — who have “religious sensitivities”!

    • David Zwiebel, executive vice president of Agudath Israel of America, a group representing many haredi factions, offered the moderate view…

he added that prosecutors should recognize “religious sensitivities” by seeking alternatives to prison, to avoid depriving a family of its breadwinner

    • , or by finding appropriate Orthodox homes for children removed from abusive families.

 

    • “The district attorney should be careful not to be seen as making a power grab from rabbinic authority,” Mr. Zwiebel said.

 

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

Does this sound like an invitation for abuse? — Yes indeed !

And once again, Jewish children suffered for the bad decisions of Jewish authorities.

    • Advocates for victims say similar views have informed some of the Brooklyn rabbinical leadership’s worst judgments, allowing prominent rabbis who were repeatedly accused of abuse to keep their jobs and reputations.

 

    • In 2000, Rabbi Baruch Lanner, a charismatic youth leader and yeshiva principal who was the focus of students’ abuse claims for more than 20 years — and was exonerated by a beth din — became the subject of an exposé in The Jewish Week, which found more than 60 accusers. The article led to a criminal investigation and a seven-year prison term for Rabbi Lanner.

 

    • Another rabbi, Yehuda Kolko, a grade school teacher at a Flatbush yeshiva, was accused of sexually abusive behavior by parents and former students numerous times over 30 years. The complaints were dismissed by rabbinical authorities, however, until New York magazine wrote about them in 2006.

 

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

 


Jewish Fatwa



Muslim Mullahs are well know to issue Fatwas against anyone who demeans Islam in the slightest degree. Simply drawing a picture of Muhammad is a death sentence.

Now we find that Judaism has fatwas as well.

In a Jewish Fatwa, in order to obtain your death sentence, all you have to do is report a credible factual crime of child abuse to the appropriate government officials.

…one rabbi mentioned frequently on blogs cites ancient doctrine that justifies killing someone who informs on a fellow Jew.

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

One is left to assume that Jewish “justified killing” can be done by any means available, not just by the standard Islamic method of beheading.

Fear of a Jewish Fatwa

Fearing a Jewish Rabbi “Death Wish” Fatwa against him for reporting child abuse, here is the troubles which one Jewish father had to go through before he would feel free to report the abuse of his 6-year-old son.

The father had to get a Jewish “Permission” Fatwa from a Rabbi, just to be able to bring justice to his 6-year-old son.

For, committing a “sin” in Judaism can get you killed.

    • When his 6-year-old son told him one day that Rabbi Kolko had sexually abused him, the father said he resolved to go to the police because he knew that the Brooklyn hierarchy had protected the rabbi in the past.

 

    • But first he made a detour. “I booked a flight to Jerusalem,” he said. “I made an appointment to speak with a very prominent rabbi” who had written sympathetically about abuse victims.

 

    • “He told me it would be O.K. to report this teacher to the police,” the father said.

“He told me that if I reported him I would not be committing a sin.”

    • — Orthodox Jews Rely More on Sex Abuse Prosecution

 

    — by PAUL VITELLO October 13, 2009

 

Related Posts
The city of Minneapolis has set up a hotline for residents to report citizens who
Swedish lawmakers celebrated International Women’s Day by legalizing wife beating within the Islamic community, citing
A documentary about a Syrian family on Germany’s Spiegel TV has caused controversy in the
Michael Hoffman: America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law My bedtime reading is the
In the latest bit of insanity from the left-wing, a Muslim psychologist has claimed that

Hits: 463

The War On Drugs hoax

The War On Drugs hoax

Related Posts
An audit of New York state’s Medicaid program found that registered sex offenders received $63,000
The Facts:A new study has linked heartburn drugs linked to fatal heart and kidney disease,
   Death risk increases the longer such drugs are used Extended use of popular drugs
“We reject in the strongest possible terms the decision to censor ‘Rocketman’ for the Russian
May 31st, 2019 By Kelly Brogan, M.D. Guest Writer for Wake Up World Originally published

Hits: 515

The real enemy is at home

The real enemy is at home

Related Posts
IRNA – Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri
  June 12, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/06/talmudism-not-islam-is-america.html
MNA – Commander of Iran’s Army Ground Force Brigadier General Kioomars Heidari said that the
  May 30, 2019 (Left, Humanity is controlled by psychopaths)(henrymakow.com) The above-stated difference in the
    FBI Director Wray & CIA Director Haspel Both Stonewall AG Barr Source Article

Hits: 548

The Satanic Cult that rules the world

The Satanic Cult that rules the world

 

Related Posts
The wave of jubilation swept across Indian social media as the national men’s cricket team
Mohammed Halabi, arrested in 2016 by Israel on accusations of diverting charity funds to Hamas, is
   Moscow stands firmly against trade wars and "fighting without rules" in international commerce, Russian
Russia-China Partnership Ending US Unipolar World Above Photo: From Consortiumnews.com The Russia-China strategic partnership, consolidated last
   On Monday, the U.S. State Department confirmed that back in April, an American tourist

Hits: 553

Why do Children go missing every year

Why do Children go missing every year

Jewish Blood Libels and Child Sacrifices to Satan, Moloch, Baal.

Related Posts
The AN-32 military aircraft disappeared in Mechuka in Arunachal Pradesh near the border with China
  At least 5 people have died after a series of landslides in the Eastern Region
The aircraft went missing an hour after take-off from an airbase in northeastern India. It
More than 120 missing children have been found in just one day during a wide-scale
Government agencies have, under duress, declassified millions of pages of documents in recent years. But

Hits: 580

The Invention of the word JEW

The Invention of the word JEW

 

The word “Jew” is a relatively modern invention used, seemingly indiscriminately and interchangeably, by 18th century redactors to describe Israelites, Judahites and Judaeans. It first appeared in these eighteenth century Bibles and it first appears within these redactions in 2 Kings 16:6 …. in an episode that describes a war between Israel and Judah: when Rezin, king of Syria and Pekah, king of Israel went to war with wicked Ahaz, king of Judah. The Syrians “drove the Jews from Elath” who were in possession of it and so here is the first time that the inhabitants of the kingdom of Judah are called “Jews” when more properly they should be called Judahites. However, the point here is this: the very first time the word “Jew” is found in the modern Bible, they are at war with Israel.
Edomites are therefore descended from Edom (Esau) whose descendants later intermarried with the Turks to produce a Turco-Edomite mixture which later became known as Khazars. That is, most of today’s Jews are descendants of this interbreeding that produced a race called Khazars who had once governed an empire called Khazaria. Furthermore, this hybrid race Edomite/Turk/Khazar who created the Khazar kingdom and who between the seventh and ninth centuries AD, adopted the religion of Judaism. And, it is these Khazar Jews who are the ancestors of the vast majority of today’s Jewish people. That is, Edomite/Turk/Khazars are the ancestors of the modern “Jews” including the Torah-true and Zionist Jews who spuriously claim right to the land of Palestine claiming it it is theirs by biblical demands and ancestral rights.

Consequently, the majority of today’s Jewish people are known as “Jews” not because they are Judahites and descended from Jacob/Israel but because their Edomite/Turk/Khazar ancestors in their Kingdom of Khazaria adopted the religion of Judaism, called themselves “Jews” and arrogated the Birthright Promises and Bible Covenants belonging to the Israelites, but especially those belonging to the Judahites.

Thus, “Jews” are not Israelites and certainly they are not Judahites. Hence, modern Jews are not heir to the Bible Covenants nor to the ancient Nation of Israel given by Yahweh to the Israelites and the Judahites and so have no Divine Right or biblical mandate to the modern Land of Palestine.

Similarly, Jesus of Nazareth was not a “Jew” he was a Judahite, and Jesus Christ was not “King of the Jews.”

Related Posts
The International Conference on Palestine held in Istanbul between April 27-29 brought together many speakers
Shuai Geng quit his job last year to pursue a life of idle pursuits, producing
DOWNLOAD THE BOOK HERE“#1917LIVE: The Russian Revolution in Tweets” was published following a year-long interactive
Next Story Government secrecy is running rampant in an age where more and more people
Never afraid of speaking truth to power and educating the masses about the powers that

Hits: 3695

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

Related Posts
Sen. Bernie Sanders gave a very revealing answer when he was asked how he could
The OECD may not be able to include employer-based health insurance premiums into its model,
Funding The Green New Deal Without Raising Taxes And Creating Massive Debt As alarm bells
Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has refused to pay an outstanding tax bill to the IRS,
DID YOU KNOW the NAZI JEW BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY spent YOUR TAXES building ZEPPELIN BOMBERS

Hits: 519

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack School Shootings and Muslim Terrorist Groups

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack School Shootings and Muslim Terrorist Groups

Related Posts
Turkish security forces have killed a prominent member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) militant group
  Syria: ‘Russian’ warplanes bomb rebel-held Idlib, dozens dead   Russia Rebuffs Trump’s Call To
    US-Iran: Inverted Reality, Real War by Tony Cartalucci June 3, 2019 (Tony Cartalucci –
Indian news channel TV9 Gujarati and Asian News International reported on Wednesday that, following an

Hits: 338

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Related Posts
Britain’s internal secret service MI5 has been criticized for breaching laws on a serious
A former Secret Service agent assigned to the Vice President Joe Biden residence claims that
Uncle Sam has a problem in his South American “backyard” with those uppity Venezuelans who
Every investor worth his or her salt knows that buying

Hits: 540

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas

 

Related Posts
  April 19, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/04/why-christ-was-crucified.html
John W. Whitehead, Guest Waking Times“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is
Jesus Christ was not a Jew https://youtu.be/MCphuicYt0M https://youtu.be/mAXQI8JALfk
January 29th, 2019 By Nick Polizzi Guest writer for Wake Up World What do Jesus, Muhammad,
JESUS WAS NOT A Jew Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar. From

Hits: 656

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist

 

Related Posts
Turkish security forces have killed a prominent member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) militant group
  Syria: ‘Russian’ warplanes bomb rebel-held Idlib, dozens dead   Russia Rebuffs Trump’s Call To
    US-Iran: Inverted Reality, Real War by Tony Cartalucci June 3, 2019 (Tony Cartalucci –
Indian news channel TV9 Gujarati and Asian News International reported on Wednesday that, following an

Hits: 481

Are you a real Christian?

Are you a real Christian?

Or are you led by the devil himself.

Related Posts
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/11/culturewars-logosrising-is-christian-anti-semitism-responsible-for-the-poway-synagogue-shooting-e-michael-jones-published-on-jun-11-2019/
Good day Rabbi Friedland, During this past Shabbat’s service, I distributed an unauthorized “Prayer for Peace”
    Source Article from http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/05/mike-pompeo-visits-third-temple-sanhedrin-synagogue-why-video/
  May 28, 2019 Source Article from https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/05/earnest-christian.html
POWAY, California — A Southern California synagogue where a gunman killed a woman and wounded

Hits: 464

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

Related Posts
Electronic Pollution is Killing Us We live in an increasingly irradiated environment (radiation soup) with
by Andrea Garrett The ninth and final season of the animated series "My Little Pony"
UPDATE: No evidence of leaks had been found during a survey by a remote vehicle
MNA – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said the country welcomes China’s investment and participation in
IRNA – Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri

Hits: 536

If Iran Is Responsible for the Fuel Tanker Attacks in the Gulf of Oman (And It May Not Be), It Is Only a Reaction to Washington’s Outrageous Conduct in the Middle East

Who is responsible for the recent attacks on the fuel tankers in the Gulf of Oman? Washington blames Iran, and has offered what it calls proof—a grainy video allegedly showing what are said to be Iranians removing what is said to be a mine from what is said to be the hull of a stricken tanker.  But the video proves nothing more than someone removed, or appeared to remove, (not affixed but removed) something from the hull of a ship. Even The New York Times was skeptical of the video-graphic indictment. US secretary of state Mike Pompeo argued that the attacks could only have been carried out by a perpetrator with “a high level of expertise,” i.e., a state, and not just any state, but Iran. But the Times pointed out that “the video depicts a curiously haphazard operation, with an ill-advised placement of the mine on the ship, careless safety procedures to remove it and little effort to hide the activity.” [2] This is hardly what you would expect of a sophisticated perpetrator with a high level of expertise. That this so-called proof of Iranian culpability was provided by Pompeo, who in May crowed that as director of the CIA “we lied, cheated, and stole” [3] hardly makes the case more convincing.

On the other hand, while Iran fervently denies responsibility for the attacks, its denials carry little weight. The country has very good reason to disrupt the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, and equally good reason to deny it is doing so. Iran is the target of an undeclared but hardly secret war by the United States and of efforts by Washington to reduce Iranian oil exports—the country’s major source of revenue—to zero. Tehran warned as long ago as 2011 that it would retaliate against efforts to block its oil shipments, and that it would do so by dint of lex talionis—that is, via the Old Testament justice of an eye for an eye. [4] The logic is clear. Since continued access to oil revenue is a sine qua non of Iran’s existence as a viable independent state, it cannot afford to allow the United States to sever it connections to the world economy. One of the few effective measures it can take to force Washington to back off is use its geostrategic position in the Gulf to disrupt the flow of oil on which US investors depend for profits and US allies depend for energy.  Accordingly, Tehran has “repeatedly threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz if Iran isn’t allowed to export oil.” [5] The idea, then, that Iranian operatives may be behind the oil tanker attacks is hardly far-fetched. And, Iran’s leaders, hardly simpletons, would never willingly acknowledge responsibility, since an admission would quickly be turned by Washington into a casus belli.

This isn’t to say that Iran is indeed the perpetrator; only that it may be the perpetrator, and that if it is, the fact that it is, is entirely predictable. As William J. Burns, a former deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration put it, “If the Iranians were responsible for the attacks on shipping in the gulf, it is … a predictable consequence of an American coercive diplomacy strategy.” [6] What’s more, considering the nature of the undeclared US war on Iran—one led by a program of what Iranian foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif aptly calls ‘economic terrorism’—Iranian retaliation against US-allied shipping is not only predictable, but legitimate, as one of the few, if not only, means available to the Iranian state to safeguard its existence against an unprovoked attack by the United States.

Speaking at the Heritage Foundation in May, 2018, Pompeo issued a list of 12 demands to Iran, [7] reducible to three overarching requirements:

  • End support for opponents of US allies Israel and Saudi Arabia;
  • Abandon the Syrian government in its fight against a Western-backed Sunni Islamist insurgency;
  • Forebear from enriching uranium and developing ballistic missiles, activities that could provide the basis for a militarized nuclear self-defense in posse.

In short, Pompeo demanded that Iran capitulate to a US dictatorship over the region.

There is only a vanishingly small chance that the current government in Tehran, which is constitutionally opposed to monarchy (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, hence, Washington’s Arab allies), European settler colonialism (Israel), and submission to US tyranny, will prostrate itself before Pompeo’s diktats. Which means the only way Washington could possibly achieve Iranian compliance is by replacing the country’s current government with a regime of marionettes. While Washington denies it seeks regime change in Tehran, Brett McGurk, the former US envoy for the fight against ISIS, acknowledges the obvious. “Trump may not even realize it, but particularly since the arrival of John Bolton as national security adviser last year, his administration has been pursuing what are effectively regime-change policies in not one but three countries: Venezuela, Syria, and Iran.” McGurk explains that while the United States is not explicitly calling for regime change, it is pursuing policies “that, if carried to their logical conclusion, necessitate a change of government.” [8]

There is no doubt that, its denials notwithstanding, Washington seeks regime change in Iran. Former U.S. Ambassador Robert Blackwill points out that Pompeo’s 12 demands are “effectively impossible for Iran to accommodate without fundamentally changing its leadership and system of government.” [9] Pompeo admitted to “Michael J. Morell, a former acting director of the C.I.A., that the administration’s strategy would not coerce Iranian leaders into a friendlier stance. But, he said, ‘I think what can change is, the people can change the government.’” [10] In other words, since the current government is unlikely to bow to US demands, a new government must be installed, one willing to pander to US requirements. This accords with the thinking of US national security advisor John Bolton. In July 2017, Bolton opined, “The behavior and the objectives of the regime are not going to change and, therefore, the only solution is to change the regime itself.’” [11] If any further proof is needed that Washington is pursuing a regime change program, consider this:

  • Bolton has long been on record as demanding regime change in Iran. “The declared policy of the United States should be the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime in Tehran,” Bolton said before being hired by US president Donald Trump. [12] Michael McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia, argues that given Bolton’s very clear positions, “If you hire him, you’re making a clear signal that’s what you want.” [13] “In May 2018, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani told reporters that the administration is ‘committed to regime change’ in Iran.” [14]
  • Bolton “warned Iran’s leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, after the 40th anniversary of Iran’s 1979 revolution, that he should not expect ‘many more to enjoy’ (suggesting that Khamenei may be gone in a year).” [15]
  • Pompeo has referred to the US “effort to make sure that the Iranian people get control of their capital” [16] and has “suggested the Iranian public could take matters into its own hands.” [17]

If the US goal of regime change in Iran isn’t secret, then neither are the means by which Washington intends to achieve its objective. The methods are clearly spelled out in open source documents and have been reported widely in the US news media. In sum, the United States seeks to recruit Iranian citizens en masseas US agents of regime change. The goal is to induce Iranian citizens to “take matters into [their] own hands” and “get control of their capital.” The lash that will drive them to do this, according to the plan, will be the misery created by US efforts to destroy the Iranian economy, chiefly by driving Iran’s oil revenue to zero, a goal to be achieved by threatening secondary sanctions on any country that does business with the Islamic Republic. Driven by economic desperation, Iranians will channel their energies into movements to overthrow the government, facilitated by a CIA-led program of subversion, if the plan proves successful. At the same time, the CIA will stir up unrest among Iran’s ethnic minorities, adding to the maelstrom.

Washington has subjected Iran to what Pompeo calls “the strongest sanctions in history,” [18] which he describes “as being calculated to produce domestic political unrest in Iran.” [19] “What Mr. Trump and his team are trying to do,” observed The Wall Street Journal, “is to use economic sanctions to generate unprecedented pressure on Iran … to create enough economic distress in Iran that the regime could buckle under the weight of popular discontent.” [20]

Whether the sanctions are the strongest in history, as Pompeo claims, is unclear. But what is clear is that they attack the length and breadth of the Iranian economy. The United States “has sanctioned the oil sector, the metals industry and military leaders by cutting them off from the American-led international financial system. To compel unhappy allies to go along, it has threatened to cut off their companies as well if they continue doing business with Iran.” [21]

More “than 700 Iranian banks, companies and individuals, have been targeted. [22] And Washington imposed “sanctions that would severely penalize any foreign or U.S. company that does business with Iran.” [23] The US goal is to completely cut off all Iranian oil sales [24] and to blockade the country economically.

Iran’s foreign secretary calls the sanctions economic terrorism, and with good reason. If terrorism is the threat, or infliction, of harm on civilians in order to achieve political ends, then the US measures clearly constitute terrorism. There’s no doubt that the measures are intended to achieve the political goal of regime change; that they’re intended to pressure Iranian civilians; and that they’re causing harm to civilians.

As a result of US economic coercion, Iran’s economy is cratering, according to The Wall Street Journal. [25] The New York Times says the Iranian economy is “reeling from sanctions” [26] and that it is “in a bad state.” [27] Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, says his country is facing the worst economic challenge in forty years. [28]

US economic warfare on Iran has caused the value of the country’s currency, the rial, to plunge. [29] This, in turn, has “led to a sharp increase in the prices of imported goods.” [30] “By raising the cost of imports, the currency collapse” has sparked a massive inflation. Inflation is running at 40 per cent. [31] Inflation has bankrupted businesses  and put many imported goods, such as critical medicines, beyond  the reach of ordinary Iranians. [32] The IMF predicts that the economy will continue to undergo significant contraction. [33] In turn, the misery of ordinary Iranians will increase.

The cratering of the Iranian economy by itself creates the possibility of social unrest, but leaving nothing to chance, Washington has established a CIA program to help the process along. “In 2017, John Bolton—not yet national security adviser—recommended in a memo to President Trump that the U.S. support ‘internal resistance’ and minorities inside Iran,” according to The Wall Street Journal. [34] As it turned out, the administration was already working along these lines. HR McMaster, Bolton’s predecessor as national security advisor, had “signed and put out a 27-page methodical Iran strategy with two prongs. The first was…a subversion campaign to influence Iran’s population. The second was confrontation,” according to Bob Woodward, in his book about the Trump White House, Fear. [35] The New York Times’ Matthew Rosenberg and Adam Goldman had reported in June 2017 that the US president had “appointed to the National Security Council hawks eager to contain Iran and push regime change, the groundwork for which would most likely be laid through C.I.A. covert action.” According to the reporters, “Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the council’s senior director for intelligence — the main White House liaison to intelligence agencies” had told other administration officials that he wanted “to use American spies to help oust the Iranian government.”  Appointed to lead the subversion operation was Michael D’Andrea, “the Central Intelligence Agency officer who oversaw the hunt for Osama bin Laden.” D’Andrea goes by the sobriquets “Dark Prince or Ayatollah Mike.” [36]

In late December 2017 and early January 2018 economic “problems and political complaints led to a wave of public protests in more than 100 Iranian cities.” [37] Trump aides pointed “to outbursts of protest in the streets of Iranian cities as a sign that, maybe” Pompeo’s “strongest sanctions in history” were producing their intended effect. One senior administration aide acknowledged “that the protests are ’sporadic’ and without any central organization, but” said: “In a hundred cities and towns in the country there is enormous dissatisfaction.”  [38] According to The New York Times, “with runaway inflation, broad economic problems and labor unrest, the Iranian government believes its popularity is weakening.” [39]

Bolton had also called on Washington to foment secessionist unrest among “minorities inside Iran.” [40]  Ethnic minorities, including Kurds, Arabs, and Baluchis, account for one-third or more of Iran’s population, [41] and uprisings by these communities could substantially add to the chaos already occasioned by Washington’s economic war on the Persian Gulf state. The Wall Street Journal reported that “Iran’s non-Persian ethnic groups, once relatively quiet, are increasingly discontented with the regime,” and that the “wave of protests across much of the country … has been strongest in the predominantly non-Persian districts.” [42] “Kurdish groups have been clashing with Iranian forces with increasing frequency in the northwest, where most of Iran’s roughly 8 million Kurds live.” To the south, Arab separatists launched a September 2018 attack on a military parade in Iran’s main oil hub. Meanwhile, “to the east, insurgents fighting for greater autonomy or independence for the Baluch people of Iran have hit military posts in an area bordering Pakistan.” [43]

Bad enough as these malign US actions are, US economic terrorism and CIA subversion are only two layers of a palimpsest of US aggression, overlaid upon ongoing US military pressure. As The New York Times notes, “The United States Navy’s Fifth Fleet patrols the Persian Gulf. American forces are deployed in Iraq to the east, Afghanistan to the west and in other regional neighbors including Turkey, Bahrain and Qatar.” [44] Iran is hemmed in by hostile US forces.

The country has also been the target of a major US cyberwarfare effort. “In the early years of the Obama administration,” wrote David E. Sanger and Mark Mezzetti in The New York Times, “the United States developed an elaborate plan for a cyberattack on Iran in case the diplomatic effort to limit its nuclear program failed and led to a military conflict. The plan, according to the reporters, is “code-named Nitro Zeus,” and is “devised to disable Iran’s air defenses, communications systems and crucial parts of its power grid.” At its zenith, “the planning for Nitro Zeus involved thousands of American military and intelligence personnel, spending tens of millions of dollars and placing electronic implants in Iranian computer networks to ‘prepare the battlefield,’ in the parlance of the Pentagon.” [45]

Earlier, the United States’ “fast-growing ranks of secret cyberwarriors” had blown up nuclear centrifuges in Iran in an effort to prevent the country from acquiring a latent nuclear weapons capability that could be actualized in an emergency to defend itself. “The attacks on Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, begun in the George W. Bush administration and code-named Olympic Games, destroyed roughly 1,000 centrifuges and set back the Iranians by a year or so,” according to The New York Times. [46]

Recently, Washington has ratchetted up its military pressure on Iran, sending a carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, “and its accompanying ships as well as what is known as a bomber task force to the region.” [47]  The US warship carries more than 40 F-18 Super Hornets, which are “now conducting ‘persistent presence’ missions in international airspace near Iran,” [48] that is, unremitting patrols along the edge of Iranian airspace with one purpose: intimidation. “The U.S. also is sending the amphibious assault ship USS Arlington to the Middle East. The ship carries U.S. marines, amphibious vehicles and helicopters that can be used in a range of military operations.” [49]

Additionally, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan presented an updated military plan that envisions sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East.”  Some US officials dismiss the plans as a scare tactic, [50] a bluff designed to frighten the Iranians. But bluff or not, the intent is to intimidate, and is thus part of the undeclared war on Iran.

If Iran is indeed responsible for disrupting the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf (and it may not be), its actions are only the predictable consequence of the multilayered US aggression. What’s more, attacks on Persian Gulf shipping may be the only practicable means by which Iran can defend itself against a threat to its very existence as a viable independent state. What recourse has Iran to avert the complete collapse of its economy, and the starvation of its citizens, while retaining its independence, but to carry out deniable attacks on Persian Gulf shipping to disrupt the tranquil digestion of US oil company profits and uninterrupted delivery of oil supplies to US allies? Despite the promises of the European Union to rescue Iran from economic collapse by way of a financial mechanism that would allow the country to circumvent the US blockade, Brussels has failed to deliver. “These days, the biggest, baddest weapon in the American arsenal isn’t a missile, or a tank, or a fighter jet. It is America’s economic clout,” observes The Wall Street Journal’s Gerald F. Seib. [51] The Iranians, it seems, are on their own, fated to mount a defense against the economic clout of the world’s largest economy and the military clout of the planet’s biggest war machine.

US chauvinists will retort that while the war on Iran is undeclared and may be reasonably described as terrorism that it is, all the same, justifiable as a measure to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them, to say nothing of pressuring Tehran to curb its support for Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Syrian government, and to cease its opposition to Israel and Saudi Arabia. There is insufficient space to reply in full here, except to make the following points:

  • If Iran had ever been working on a militarized nuclear program, it abandoned the work as long ago as 2003, according to the US intelligence community. [52]
  • If Iran embarks on a militarized nuclear program, it will be the predictable consequence of ongoing US and Israeli military pressure.
  • If the United States, Israel, Britain, France, and other countries can maintain nuclear arsenals in order, they say, to protect themselves from nuclear blackmail, why should that option be permanently foreclosed to Iran (or any other country whose sovereignty is outraged by more militarily formidable opponents)? If nuclear weapons are to be counted among the military equipment available to imperialist powers and settler colonial states, should they not also be available to states seeking to defend themselves against the formers’ predations?
  • Using pressure to coerce Iran to alter its foreign policy to accommodate US needs is an act of imperialism and a violation of Iran’s independence, to say nothing of its being an incentive to Iran to develop the nuclear weapons Washington claims it seeks to prevent Iran from developing.

Iran’s foreign policy is rooted in the country’s opposition to monarchy and European settler colonialism, along with its intolerance of Western domination of the Muslim world. Since most of Washington’s Arab allies collude in the US tyranny over West Asia, and since most of its Arab allies are monarchies, and since Israel is a settler colonial state, Iran, quite naturally, finds itself at odds with Washington’s satraps in the region, and allied to Syria and movements opposed to Israeli apartheid and US dictatorship. It ought to be clear who the good guys are in this struggle—or at the very least, who they aren’t. Iran may not be on the right side of every progressive struggle, but it is clearly on the right side of this one—a struggle against three of humanity’s most abhorrent institutions: monarchy, settler colonialism, and empire.

1 Quoted in “Iran letter to the UNSG and UNSC on Pompeo provocative statement,” Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran, November 30, 2018.

Mark LandlerJulian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt, “U.S. Puts Iran on Notice and Weighs Response to Attack on Oil Tankers,” The New York Times, June 14, 2019.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfrhATD4nM0

4 David E. Sanger and Annie Lowrey, “Iran threatens to block oil shipments, as U.S. prepares sanctions,” The New York Times, December 27, 2011.

5 Benoit Faucon, Costas Paris, and Summer Said, “Gulf of Oman attacks trigger together security on key shipping routes,” The Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2019.

6 David E. Sanger and Edward Wong, “After placing blame for attacks, Trump faces difficult choices on confronting Iran,” The New York Times, June 13, 2019.

7 Michael R. Gordon, “US lays out demands for new Iran deal,” The Wall Street Journal, May 21, 2018.

8 Brett McGurk, “American foreign policy adrift: Pompeo is calling for realism—Trump isn’t delivering,” Foreign Affairs, June 5, 2019.

9 Edward Wong, “Trump pushes Iraq to stop buying energy from Iran,” The New York Times, February 11, 2019.

10 Vivian Yee, “US sanctions cut deep, but Iran seems unlikely to budge,” The New York Times, May 12, 2019.

11 Walter Russel Mead, “Trump’s Iran gambit,” The Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2018.

12 Patrick Cockburn, “The mysterious ‘sabotage’ of Saudi oil tankers is a dangerous moment in Trump’s pumped up feud with Iran,” The Independent, May 13, 2019.

13 David E. Sanger and Gardiner Harris, “’America First’ bears a new threat: military force,” The New York Times, March 24, 2018.

14 Walter Russel Mead, “Trump’s Iran gambit,” The Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2018.

15 Brett McGurk, “American foreign policy adrift: Pompeo is calling for realism—Trump isn’t delivering,” Foreign Affairs, June 5, 2019.

16 Edward Wong and Ben Hubbard, “Pompeo’s anti-Iran tour faces obstacles of a fractious Middle East,” The New York Times, January 14, 2019.

17 Ian Talley, “US toughens stance on future Iran oil exports,” The Wall Street Journal, June 26, 2018.

18 Michael R. Gordon, “US lays out demands for new Iran deal,” The Wall Street Journal, May 21, 2018.

19 Mark Landler, Maggie Haberman and Eric Schmitt, “Trump tells Pentagon chief he does not want war with Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, May 16, 2019.

20 Gerald F. Seib, “Amid the fog, Trump’s real agenda in Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, May 20, 2019.

21 Gerald F. Seib, “The risks in overusing America’s big economic weapon,” The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2019.

22 Ian Talley and Courtney McBride, “As new Iran sanctions loom, US aims to plug gaps,” The Wall Street Journal, November 2, 2018.

23 Greg Ip, “Trump trade levers test long-term US alliances,” The Wall Street Journal, June 2, 2019.

24 Ian Talley and Courtney McBride, “As new Iran sanctions loom, US aims to plug gaps,” The Wall Street Journal, November 2, 2018.

25 Grep Ip, “Trump trade levers test long-term US alliances,” The Wall Street Journal, June 2, 2019.

26 Edward Wong and Clifford Krauss, “US moves to stop all nations from buying Iranian oil, but China is defiant,” The New York Times, April 22, 2019.

27 Thomas Erdbrink, “Iran is changing, but not in ways Trump thinks,” The New York Times, June 25, 2018.

28 Thomas Erdbrink, “Iran faces worst economic challenge in 40 years, president says,” The New York Times, January 30, 2019.

29 Sune Engel Rasmussen and Michael R. Gordon, “Iran defies US bid to curb its Middle East influence,” The Wall Street Journal, September 7, 2018.

30 Thomas Erdbrink, “Iran is changing, but not in ways Trump thinks,” The New York Times, June 25, 2018.

31 Patrick Cockburn, “The mysterious ‘sabotage’ of Saudi oil tankers is a dangerous moment in Trump’s pumped up feud with Iran,” The Independent, May 13, 2019.

32 Edward Wong and Clifford Krauss, “US moves to stop all nations from buying Iranian oil, but China is defiant,” The New York Times, April 22, 2019; Thomas Erdbrink, “Iran’s economic crisis drags down the middle class almost overnight,” The New York Times, December 26, 2018.

33 Patrick Cockburn, “Europe doesn’t have the power to be much more than a spectator in the escalating US-Iran conflict,” The Independent, May 11, 2019.

34 Isabel Coles and Ali Nabhan, “Iranian groups press for rights—and Tehran hits back,” The Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2018.

35 Bob Woodward. Fear: Trump in the White House. Simon & Shuster. 2018. p. 133.

36 Matthew Rosenberg and Adam Goldman, “CIA names the ‘dark prince’ to run Iran operations, signaling a tougher stance,” The New York Times, June 2, 2017.

37 Asa Fitch, “New unrest roils Iran as US ramps up pressure,” The Wall Street Journal, July 1, 2018.

38 Gerald F. Seib, “Amid the fog, Trump’s real agenda in Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, May 20, 2019.

39 Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt, “Pentagon builds deterrent force against possible Iranian attack,” The New York Times, May 10, 2019.

40 Isabel Coles and Ali Nabhan, “Iranian groups press for rights—and Tehran hits back,” The Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2018.

41 Isabel Coles and Ali Nabhan, “Iranian groups press for rights—and Tehran hits back,” The Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2018.

42 Walter Russel Mead, “Trump’s Iran gambit,” The Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2018.

43 Isabel Coles and Ali Nabhan, “Iranian groups press for rights—and Tehran hits back,” The Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2018.

44 Rick Gladstone, “Iran’s missile tests and the nuclear deal,” The New York Times, March 10, 2016.

45 David E. Sanger and Mark Mazzetti, “U.S. had cyberattack plan if Iran nuclear dispute led to conflict,” The New York Times, February 16, 2016.

46 David E. Sanger and Eric Schmitt, “U.S. cyberweapons, used against Iran and North Korea, are a disappointment against ISIS,” The New York Times, June 12, 2017.

47 Gordon Lubold and Michael R. Gordon, “US deploys forces to Mideast to deter Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, May 5, 2019.

48 Gordon Lubold, “US commander weighs an expanded Mideast force to counter Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, June 9, 2019.

49 Nancy A. Yousef, “US bolsters its Gulf defense to counter Iran,” The Wall Street Journal, May 10, 2019.

50 Eric Schmitt and Julian E. Barnes, “White House reviews military plans against Iran, in echoes of Iraq war,” The New York Times, May 13, 2019.

51 Gerald F. Seib, “The risks in overusing America’s big economic weapon,” The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2019.

52 David E. Sanger, “US says Iran could expedite nuclear bomb,” The New York Times, September 10, 2009.

Feature photo | An oil tanker is on fire in the sea of Oman, June 13, 2019. Two oil tankers near the strategic Strait of Hormuz were reportedly attacked last Thursday, an assault that left one ablaze and adrift. Photo | ISNA

Stephen Gowans is a Canadian-based political activist and foreign policy analyst. He is the author of Israel, A Beachhead in the Middle East (Spring 2019); Patriots, Traitors and Empires; and Washington’s Long War on Syria. Visit his personal blog at gowans.blog.

Published with special permission from the author

<!–

–>

Source Article from https://www.mintpressnews.com/if-iran-is-responsible-for-the-fuel-tanker-attacks-in-the-gulf-of-oman-and-it-may-not-be-it-is-only-a-reaction-to-washingtons-outrageous-conduct-in-the-middle-east/259232/

Related Posts
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/16/ken-okeefe-commentary-9-11-truth-vs-washington-mouthpiece-the-debate/
Hell-bent on isolating and suffocating Iran, the Trump administration derailed Japan’s historic talks by accusing
Tasnim – International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano expressed hope that Tehran and Washington
  We're two weeks away from summer and parts of Washington are still getting fresh snow!
Unilateral sanctions are being imposed by the United States on Cuba. In the light of

Hits: 15

Huawei founder on fight with US: ‘No one will win’

Huawei’s founder on Monday said it never occurred to the Chinese technology company that the US government would be so determined to take extreme measures against it.

(Source: AP)

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/17/598743/Huawei-founder-on-fight-with-US-No-one-will-win

Related Posts
  U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Sunday that President Donald Trump might ease U.S.
Like his boss, President Trump, and many others in Washington, Pompeo seems blind to an
  The world's second largest continent, Africa, is experiencing one of the fastest urbanization rates globally
  President Donald Trump on Thursday for the first time linked a dispute over telecom giant
Feng said that China hoped the US will behave rationally and curb what he described

Hits: 16

Palestinians in Gaza to receive new Qatari financial aid

Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip will receive a new tranche of financial aid donated by the gas-rich Persian Gulf state of Qatar. 

Media reports quoting unnamed Qatari officials reported on Monday that the money was brought into the Palestinian enclave Sunday evening by a Qatari envoy to Gaza.

The cash grant of 10 million US dollars was to be distributed to more than 100,000 impoverished Gazan families all over the coastal sliver, with each receiving 100 dollars.

Another 15 million dollars would be provided for infrastructure and cash-for-work projects.

In early May, Qatar allocated nearly half a billion US dollars in aid to the Palestinian Authority as well as the Islamic resistance movement, Hamas, in order to support education and health services and provide urgent humanitarian relief.

Qatar has committed to providing $15 million a month into Gaza under an informal agreement struck last November.

Palestinian government employees collect portions of their overdue salaries at a post office in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on December 8, 2018. (Photo by AFP)

On January 24, Hamas turned down Qatari funds over Israel’s change of conditions due to the unrest along the border fence between the strip and the Israeli-occupied territories, criticizing Tel Aviv for imposing new conditions on the money entering the blockaded Palestinian territory.

Hamas has recently announced a series of new measures to support low-income families, improve electricity infrastructure, expand imports and exports and ensure unemployed university graduates find work.

Gaza has also witnessed tensions since March 30, 2018 which marked the start of the Great March of Return protests, with participants demanding the right to return for those driven out of their homeland.

This picture taken on March 30, 2019 from the southern Israeli kibbutz of Nahal Oz across the fence at Gaza’s border, shows Palestinian protesters waving national flags as they demonstrate to mark the first anniversary of the “March of Return” protests. (Photo by AFP)

The coastal sliver of land has been under a crippling siege by Israel since 2007 and witnessed three wars since 2008.

According to the United Nations, around 80 percent of Palestinians in Gaza are reliant on international aid.

The administration of US President Donald Trump has already canceled all US funding to the UN aid program for Palestinian refugees, part of a policy to impose maximum pressure on the Palestinians to satisfy Israeli interests and Zionist constituencies in the US.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/17/598742/Palestine-Gaza-Strip-Qatar-Israel-Great-March-of-Return

Related Posts
Dr. Mercola, Guest Waking TimesAugust 10, 2018, a jury found Monsanto (now owned by Bayer
JTA — The remains of 300 people killed by the Nazis and used by a
Waking TimesWould you like to start 2019 with an open heart and mind, feeling grounded
November 6, 2018 By B.N. Frank In September, Activist Post published an article about donations
(Natural News) Let’s assume for a moment that the flu vaccine provided

Hits: 41

Lebanon arrests Daesh-linked suspect over bomb attack plots

Lebanese Security forces have arrested a Syrian national suspected of having links to the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group that was plotting to launch attacks on religious sites in the south of the country.

The Internal Security Forces (ISF) said in a statement on Monday that they had “tracked down and identified a man in southern Lebanon who actively publishes ISIL propaganda on social media networks and recruits new members” for the terrorist group.

The suspect, a 20-year-old Syrian national from Lebanon’s southern village of Yater, was in contact with individuals outside Lebanon who helped him to create social networking sites to promote Takfiri ideology, according to the statement.

The ISF said the Syrian national used the sites to discuss plans to carry out bomb attacks on Christian churches, inspired by the deadly Easter bombings in Sri Lanka, and Shia religious centers in the south.

According to the ISF, the suspect shared in April a Daesh video that showed the group’s leader Ibrahim al-Samarrai, also known as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, hailing the Sri Lanka bombings, which targeted churches and luxury hotels in the Sri Lankan capital of Colombo and two other cities on April 21 and claimed at least 253 lives.

He also downloaded a manual compiled by followers of the Takfiri terrorist group instructing readers on how to make improvised bombs and explosives, the ISF statement added.

The suspect is also believed to have spray painted Daesh slogans on walls in the Yater village.

Lebanon has often seen the infiltration of Takfiri elements from neighboring Syria into its territory, where they target the civilian population or security forces with bombings.

In August 2014, members of the Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, formerly known as Nusra Front, and Daesh terrorist groups overran the town of Arsal, located 124 kilometers northeast of Beirut, killing a number of Lebanese forces. They took 30 soldiers hostage, most of whom have been released.

Since then, Hezbollah resistance fighters and Lebanese military forces have been defending Lebanon on the country’s northeastern frontier against foreign-backed terrorist groups from Syria.

Hezbollah fighters have fended off several Daesh attacks inside Lebanon. They have also been providing assistance to Syrian army forces to counter the ongoing foreign-sponsored militancy.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/17/598738/Lebanon-ISF-Syrian-suspect-Yater-religious-sites

Related Posts
Indian news channel TV9 Gujarati and Asian News International reported on Wednesday that, following an
A suspect confronted the court, two other under investigation; reports about another suspect who left
We waved goodbye to general warrants with the Fourth Amendment back in 1791.
Police have conspicuously avoided taking responsibility for the death of Emantic Bradford Jr. after
     UK ministers relied on questions from a tortured terror suspect to make their case

Hits: 22

Palestine urges immediate ICC probe into crimes by Israeli regime, settlers

The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates has called on the International Criminal Court (ICC) to launch an immediate investigation into the crimes of the Tel Aviv regime and extremist Jewish settlers.

The ministry, in a statement released on Monday, condemned the settlers’ assault on the town of Kafr Malik, located 17 kilometers northeast of the occupied central West Bank city of Ramallah, which resulted in the damage of a number of private Palestinian vehicles and racist graffiti being spray-painted on the walls of a local mosque.

“The Israeli regime’s pride in settlement expansion and land grabs reached a blatant provocation in a ceremony attended by [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and [US Ambassador to Israel David] Friedman to launch a new settlement in the occupied Golan Heights named after US President Donald Trump,” the statement read.

This picture shows the aftermath of a settler attack on the town of Kafr Malik, located 17 kilometers northeast of the occupied central West Bank city of Ramallah, on June 17, 2019. (Photo via Twitter)

It added, “The rise in Israeli forces’ and settlers’ expropriation of occupied Palestinian territories and their reckless disregard for international law and resolutions constitute a flagrant challenge to international peace, and the so-called advocates of human rights that claim peace can be achieved through [the so-called] two-state solution.”Extremist Jewish settlers stormed Kafr Malik late on Sunday, slashing the tires of four Palestinian vehicles and spray-painting racist anti-Palestinian slogans on the walls of a mosque there.

The Palestinian foreign ministry finally called on local, regional and international human rights organizations to quickly document these crimes in order to submit them to the ICC, urging them to speed up the opening of an official investigation into these crimes in order to hold Israel accountable for war crimes.

Extremist Jewish settlers stormed Kafr Malik late on Sunday, slashing the tires of four Palestinian vehicles and spray-painting racist anti-Palestinian slogans on the walls of a mosque there.

On Monday morning, Israeli military forces stormed the Palestinian neighborhood of al-Isawiyah in East Jerusalem al-Quds, uprooting tens of trees under the pretext of “security measures.”

Muhammad Abu al-Hummus, a member of a local follow-up committee, said Israeli forces raided the southwestern flank of the area, and took out tens of trees, claiming they were “obstructing the work of surveillance cameras” installed in the region.

Israeli settlers uprooted and chopped down 30 olive trees near the town of Bani Na’im, located 8 kilometers east of al-Khalil, on Sunday.

Rateb Jabour, a local activist, said the tress belonged to Palestinian farmers, and they had been planted there some 30 years ago.

About 600,000 Israelis live in over 230 illegal settlements built since the 1967 Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem al-Quds.

The UN Security Council has condemned Israel’s settlement activities in the occupied territories in several resolutions.

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/17/598736/Palestine-urges-immediate-ICC-probe-into-Israeli-regime-settlers-crimes

Related Posts
Sputnik – Earlier this week, Saudi Arabia blamed Iran for the 13 June attacks on
IRNA – The South Korean Economy and Finance Minister Hong Nam-ki in a meeting with
Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has warned against the risk of a conflict in
Above Photo: The Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, right, and Venezuela’s foreign minister, Jorge Arreaza, give
Britain has reacted to Iran’s announcement that it will suspend parts of its commitments

Hits: 35

Iran, Russia sign cooperation agreements at 15th commission meeting

Ghanbar Naderi
Press TV, Tehran

Iranian and Russian trade representatives have signed several cooperation agreements during the 15th joint meeting of economic and trade cooperation in Tehran. As Our correspondent reports, the two sides will finalize several other trade agreements on the last day of the meeting in Isfahan.

 

Source Article from http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2019/06/17/598735/Iran-Russia-sign-cooperation-agreements-at-15th-commission-meeting

Related Posts
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/15/breaking-putin-u-s-russia-relations-are-getting-worse-and-worse/
The Russian embassy in Syria has slammed CBS News for sending its reporters into Idlib
   Moscow stands firmly against trade wars and "fighting without rules" in international commerce, Russian
(ANTIWAR.COM) — US military intelligence agency the DIA has issued a new statement directly accusing the
Russia-China Partnership Ending US Unipolar World Above Photo: From Consortiumnews.com The Russia-China strategic partnership, consolidated last

Hits: 19

US will not ‘stumble into’ war with Iran by mistake. If it happens, it will be by design

Last week, Donald Trump pinned the blame for the attack on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman squarely on Iran. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been running around provoking Iran in word and deed for months, called the attacks an “unacceptable escalation of tension.” The so-called proof came in the form of a grainy video that presented more questions than answers.

The version of events offered by the US was quickly challenged by the Japanese shipping company which owns one of the tankers damaged in the attack – and the German foreign minister threw another spanner in the works, saying that Washington’s footage was “not enough” to prove Iranian culpability. Britain, as could only be expected, took the Pompeo narrative at face value, with Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt explaining that it was his “instinct” to believe the US “because they are our closest ally.” Solid reasoning, as ever, from London.

However, for every irredeemable neocon who believes this sketchy story, there appear to be 10 more who doubt it – because with such a long history of using false-flag attacks to begin wars, only someone with their head buried very deep in the sand could not feel at least a little skeptical about recent events.




Also on rt.com
Kremlin compares US attacks on Iran to fake ‘white powder evidence’ against Iraq in 2003



There is ample evidence to suggest that central figures within the Trump administration are itching for a war with Iran and willing to go to great lengths to get one. Despite this, there are repeated suggestions from the media that the US could “stumble” into a war with Iran “accidentally” or “by mistake” – despite purportedly wanting to avoid entanglement in another military conflict.

If they are not careful, “the two arch foes could stumble into a conflict,” one Reuters report warned. The UK Telegraph explained British concerns about the risks of “stumbling into an unwanted war.” Foreign Policy magazine published a piece about how Washington and Tehran could prevent an “accidental war.”

READ MORE: Why is the US always ‘stumbling’ or ‘sliding’ into war? How the media misleads with language

Let’s get one thing straight. Washington does not get into wars “by mistake.”

Between Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton, Trump filled two of the most crucial positions in his administration with men who have demonstrated a psychopathic appetite for war with Iran – and not just in the last few months, but over many, many years. Bolton penned an op-ed for the New York Times in 2015 openly advocating for the US to bomb Iran. The US, he wrote “could do a thorough job of destruction” while offering “vigorous” support to the Iranian opposition. With positions in four Republican administrations, he has been impatiently making the case for Iranian regime change for decades.

The Trump administration itself has been taunting and provoking Iran from day one. For Mike “we lied, we cheated, we stole” Pompeo, who has been the most public face of Trump’s anti-Iran campaign, a conflict would certainly be no mistake, either. Trump himself appears less enthusiastic and there are rumors that he is unhappy with Bolton’s bloodlust and constant attempts to steer him toward wars. One can only hope rumors of his looming firing prove true.




Also on rt.com
‘Is it diplomacy, Mr Pompeo?’ Iran recalls US history of false-flag ops, questions tanker attacks



The language of the “accidental war,” the conflicts that somehow manage to come looking for the US but never the other way around, is an obfuscation. It ignores years of US provocation against Iran.

This strange terminology is not reserved for Iran, either. As I have written before, the media often frames US military action as something that happened while good men fell asleep at the wheel. Media reports have had the US “drifting,” “sliding” and “sleepwalking” into wars all over the place. When it is not drowsily stumbling into conflicts, it is being “dragged into” or “sucked into” them. This language intentionally removes the agency from the most powerful and trigger-happy country on Earth, recasting it as the victim.

Incredibly, some print media have been willing to question the US narrative on the Gulf of Oman attacks – far more, at least, than they have done when it comes to other recent regime-change efforts from Syria to Venezuela. Perhaps we can actually thank Pompeo and Bolton for this sudden splash of skepticism. Their eagerness for war has been so transparent, it would be almost criminal for supposedly serious newspapers not to question their statements.




Also on rt.com
Pentagon seeks to build global ‘consensus’ on Iran. Is it time to worry?



The cable news networks have been another story entirely, far more interested in beating the war drums than asking questions. CNN’s Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr is taking particular heat on Twitter for taking her title a bit too literally, regurgitating baseless claims from nameless military “sources” and spreading them around online like they were facts.

What exactly happened to those two tankers, we still don’t know. Nor can we predict what might happen next – but the one thing of which we can be totally certain, is that if the US goes to war with Iran, it will be entirely by design.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462044-iran-war-mistake-us/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
An undercover sheriff deputy was at Xion’s property conducting a warrantless “knock and talk,” following
Lucas Koerner (VA) : Rival marches flooded the streets of Caracas on Saturday as Venezuelans
I have always wanted to try making my own almond milk and was so excited
MNA – The leader of the religious group Nation of Islam (NOI) has described the
He pointed out that the US has isolated itself in the international arena as a

Hits: 21

Microsoft & Pentagon are quietly hijacking US elections (by Lee Camp)

The most trustworthy of corporations recently announced it is going to selflessly and patriotically secure our elections. It’s a small company run by vegans and powered by love. It goes by the name “Microsoft.” (You’re forgiven for never having heard of it.)

The recent headlines were grandiose and thrilling:

Microsoft offers software tools to secure elections.”

Microsoft aims to modernize and secure voting with ElectionGuard.”

Could anything be safer than software christened “ElectionGuard™”?! It has “guard” right there in the name. It’s as strong and trustworthy as the little-known Crotch Guard™ – an actual oil meant to be sprayed on one’s junk. I’m unclear as to why one sprays it on one’s junk, but perhaps it’s to secure your erections? (Because they’ve been micro-soft?)

Anyway, Microsoft is foisting its ElectionGuard™ software on us, but worry not that we Americans will be tied down by laborious public debate as to the effectiveness, efficiency and accountability of said software. According to MintPress, “The election technology is already set to be adopted by half of voting machine manufacturers and some state governments for the 2020 general election.” Hardly any public discussion will plague our media or tax our community discourse.

Microsoft describes ElectionGuard™ as “a free open-source software development kit” that “will make voting secure, more accessible, and more efficient anywhere it’s used.” Wow, those are genuinely great words to hear – free and open source. The only words I like more than “open source” are “open bar,” but my dream of an open bar at every polling location remains elusive.

MintPress News’ Whitney Webb recently reported on ElectionGuard™ (and in fact much of the information in this column is coming from her impressive expose). She spoke to journalist Yasha Levine, who said: “What open source does is give a veneer of openness that leads one to think that thousands of people have vetted the code and flagged any bugs. But, actually very few people have the time and ability to look at this code. So, this idea that open source code is more transparent isn’t really true.

And as WikiLeaks proved when it revealed the CIA’s Vault 7, whenever the CIA discovers holes in important code, they don’t reveal it to the American people. They keep it to themselves to exploit secretly, which is what could be done with ElectionGuard™, resulting in America’s continued descent into Banana Republic™ (in both senses of the phrase).

So, while open source is better than not open source, it’s also not a silver bullet. It’s like saying that having 90 zombies chasing you is better than 100 zombies chasing you. Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s time to sit down and have a cold beer.

The press releases on ElectionGuard™ also touted a dizzying array of election security measures. I’ve reprinted the list of security measures, beginning with the most powerful measure and ending with the least powerful.

  1. Homomorphic encryption

  2. Waterproof keyboards

I imagine some of you are a bit overwhelmed by such an extensive and confusing list. Feel free to take a mental breather now and rejoin this column in a few minutes. Also, I made up number two.

I do acknowledge that “homomorphic encryption” sounds pretty freaking awesome. “Homomorphic” makes you think there might be a gay member of the X-Men. But in fact, it’s a malleable form of encryption, which apparently is not the most secure nor most sought-after form of encryption according to nerds who study the Crypto-verse (a term I conjured up just now to sound smarter). I won’t get into the details, but the experts seem to agree that homomorphic encryption will not turn our elections into an impenetrable wall of democracy, renowned the world over.

On top of that, as Webb stated: “…there is an added layer of concern given Microsoft’s past, particularly their history of working with US government agencies to bypass encryption.”

So, the company setting up the encryption for our elections is a company with a resume of helping the US government break encryption. This is like setting up a system to test for steroids in baseball and asking Sammy Sosa to help you do it.

Yet, the Microsoft takeover gets even worse because it’s not only Microsoft. They’re doing it in partnership with a cyber security firm called Galois. Whitney Webb again:

Though it describes itself as ‘a privately held US-owned and -operated company,’ public records indicate that Galois’ only investors are DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and the Office of Naval Research, both of which are divisions of the Department of Defense.”

Did you catch that? Galois claims to be a private company, but its only investor is the f**king Pentagon. To rephrase something you already understood in another way so that you get mildly annoyed with me: Microsoft and our war machine are taking over the American election system.

Honestly, who would put election software in the hands of DARPA? DARPA’s the department that tries to put microchips in soldiers’ brains to create Terminators or Robocops or other dystopian hounds of hell. If your first response upon hearing about an invention is, “That’s f**king awful!” – DARPA came up with that.




Also on rt.com
Mind-controlled drones? Pentagon hopes to test telepathy tech on humans within 4 years



I wouldn’t even let someone from DARPA look after my cat for the weekend. We all know I’d come home, the cat would have half a head and a Game Boy duct-taped to its ass. “F**k you, DARPA! I don’t care if the Mario Kart theme song plays when it s**ts. Get out of my apartment!

Now, imagine that scenario but replace the cat with our entire election system.

MintPress further revealed Galois has a spin-off company called “Free & Fair” that creates technology for elections and worked with Microsoft to make ElectionGuard™.

Unfortunately, Free & Fair is connected to every form of neocon think tank, government agency and large corporation. They’re especially in bed with the Department of Homeland Security.

So what’s wrong with that, you might ask.

As Webb details, “before, during and after the 2016 election, the Department of Homeland Security was caught attempting to hack into state electoral systems in at least three states – Georgia, Indiana, and Idaho – with similar accusations also made by Kentucky and West Virginia… DHS, which initially denied it, later responded that the attempted breach was ‘legitimate business.’

Legitimate business? Anytime someone from DHS says they’re involved in legitimate business, immediately duck and put your head between your knees.

Plus, the fact that Microsoft wants to introduce this software to us for free should set off an alarm bell the size of Lake Michigan. Microsoft doesn’t do anything for free. Microsoft execs don’t say hello to their grandmas for free. Microsoft is one of the most powerful companies in America because of its predatory practices. If the Mafia offered you something for free, would you just say “Thanks!” and wander off? Or would you start appreciating your final days with knees that bend?

In this world free does not mean no ulterior motive. One motive could be to control or rig our entire government. But who would want that? A tiny little country like America? Please. Our country is so inconsequential that we have a third-rate game show host as president.

MintPress may have found another ulterior motive. “Microsoft President Brad Smith announced that the company ‘is going to provide the US military with access to the best technology… all the technology we create. Full stop.’” A month prior to that, “Microsoft secured a $480 million contract with the Pentagon to provide the military with its HoloLens technology.”

So, right after getting hundreds of millions of dollars from our military, Microsoft partners with Pentagon front companies to develop free software to safeguard our elections. It seems clear the real goal is to hand over our election systems to the military industrial complex – your friendly neighborhood death machine – and bury the reality of our votes under enough encryption and complex technology that no average citizen really knows what’s happening.

Then, if (read: when) an election is rigged with this technology, we won’t be able to prove it because we don’t have reliable exit polls anymore.

Election forensics analyst Jonathan Simon said, “The great irony, and tragedy, here… is that we could easily go the opposite direction and quickly solve all the problems of election security if we got the computers out of the process and were willing to invest the modicum of effort needed for humans to count votes observably in public as they once did.

Jonathan Simon, God bless him, has used 55 words to say 11: We could easily fix our fraudulent election system, but we won’t.

The answer is not to hand it over to Microsoft and the Pentagon and the ass clowns who make robotic death machines. The Pentagon can’t keep track of $21 TRILLION DOLLARS over the past 20 years – what makes us think they can keep track of hundreds of millions of votes?




Also on rt.com
The Pentagon failed its audit amid a $21 trillion scandal (yes, trillion) – Lee Camp



The ruling elite have no interest in making sure our voices are heard. They want that as much as they want nunchucks to the balls. If they sought to have our voices heard, we would have paper ballots, ranked choice voting, real exit polls, and a president who doesn’t look and act like an over-cooked ham-and-cheese sandwich.

It’s time to demand real elections.

By Lee Camp

Lee Camp is an American stand-up comedian, writer, actor, and activist. Dubbed by Salon as the “John Oliver of Russia Today”, Camp is the host of RT America’s first comedy news show Redacted Tonight, which tackles the news agenda with a healthy dose of humor and satire. Lee’s writing credits are vast, having written for The Onion, Comedy Central and Huffington Post, as well as the acclaimed essay collections Moment of Clarity and Neither Sophisticated Nor Intelligent. Lee’s stand-up comedy has also been featured on Comedy Central,  ABC’s Good Morning America, Showtime’s The Green Room with Paul Provenza, Al-Jazeera, BBC’s Newsnight, E!, MTV, and Spike TV.

This article was originally published by Truthdig.

This column is based on a monologue Lee Camp wrote and performed on his TV show “Redacted Tonight.”

Source Article from https://www.rt.com/op-ed/462041-microsoft-pentagon-hijacking-elections/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Related Posts
JERUSALEM, PALESTINE — In a highly provocative statement — one that was most likely well
As the U.S. risks a major conflict with Iran, many have pointed out that the
Source Article from https://21stcenturywire.com/2019/05/21/extra-time-establishment-quietly-changes-skripal-narrative/
The Helms-Burton ActIn mid-April this year, the US State Department announced that it would put
An extraordinary chapter in the ongoing saga of Venezuela has been taking place, virtually unnoticed,

Hits: 32

Arrests Made as Iran Reportedly Busts ‘Large’ CIA-Run Network 6/17/2019

Arrests Made as Iran Reportedly Busts ‘Large’ CIA-Run Network

Iran has dismantled a CIA-run “large US cyber-espionage” network, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) reported, citing the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani.

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/17/arrests-made-as-iran-reportedly-busts-large-cia-run-network-6-17-2019/

Related Posts
A former Arkansas state senator, Linda Collins-Smith was found murdered in her home last week
Another day, yet another fatality in a Tesla where Autopilot may have played a role. 
Despite last night's disappointing PMI print, the latest sign that the trade-war backlash is hurting
Authored by Caitlin Johnstone via Medium.com, Julian Assange’s Swedish lawyer Per Samuelson has told the
Mikhail Krasnoshchekov, a Russian national and member of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in

Hits: 33

Syrian Human rights of Psy op?

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/17/syrian-human-rights-of-psy-op/

Related Posts
The Grayzone — The Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR) portrays itself as a neutral
Syrian government forces have conducted retaliatory strikes against the positions of Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist
The Russian embassy in Syria has slammed CBS News for sending its reporters into Idlib
South Front Fierce clashes have been ongoing in northern Hama since June 6 when Hayat
June 08, 2019 by Aram Mirzaei for The Saker Blog It’s been over a month

Hits: 12

#CultureWars #LogosRising Dr. E. Michael Jones on the Richie Allen Show

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/16/culturewars-logosrising-dr-e-michael-jones-on-the-richie-allen-show/

Related Posts
March 20, 2019  /  Gilad Atzmon Yesterday on Richie Allen Show, I spoke about Corbyn’s buddies and
February 22, 2018  /  Gilad Atzmon GA: Earlier this evening, Youtube deleted The Richie Allen Show channel, one
Ziad Fadel A riot of reports flowing in about the death of Abu Bakr Al-Baghdaadi
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/09/culturewars-logosrising-iran-palestinian-drones-hit-israeli-army-tanks-e-michael-jones-published-on-may-31-2019/
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/07/culturewars-logosrising-e-michael-jones-on-patriotic-weekly-review-e-michael-jones-published-on-jun-6-2019/

Hits: 14

Ken O’Keefe Commentary – 9/11 Truth vs Washington Mouthpiece – ‘The Debate’

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/16/ken-okeefe-commentary-9-11-truth-vs-washington-mouthpiece-the-debate/

Related Posts
Hell-bent on isolating and suffocating Iran, the Trump administration derailed Japan’s historic talks by accusing
Tasnim – International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano expressed hope that Tehran and Washington
  We're two weeks away from summer and parts of Washington are still getting fresh snow!
Unilateral sanctions are being imposed by the United States on Cuba. In the light of

Hits: 9

Israel did 9/11!! First Responder/Hero RUDY DENT exposes NWO/banksters

Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/16/israel-did-9-11-first-responder-hero-rudy-dent-exposes-nwo-banksters/

Related Posts
October 1, 2018 By The Conscious Resistance Derrick Broze questions Christine Todd Whitman (former New
DAMASCUS, SYRIA – After being banned by the Kurds in 2015, the White Helmets –
  Occupy Wall Street September 28, 2011 Responder explains how government let down those who
  Laura E. DavisYahoo! News August 19, 2011 NEW YORK — To lay eyes on
Gaza 61st Friday of Great March of Return and Breaking Siege PCHR 14 June —

Hits: 43

Homebuilder Sentiment Slips For First Time In 2019

For the first time in 2019, sentiment among US homebuilders dropped in June signaling that lower mortgage rates are failing to give the housing market a sustained boost amid property prices that remain out of reach for many buyers.

The headline index dropped to 64 from 66 (with expectations of a rise to 67). All three components declined, with sales expectations hitting a four-month low.

We note that Bloomberg reports homebuilders cited rising costs for development and construction, along with concern over trade issues and labor shortages, according to the report. The figures contrast with some signs that the housing market is picking up, as a gauge of mortgage applications jumped earlier this month by the most in four years, while new-home construction advanced in March and April.

“Despite lower mortgage rates, home prices remain somewhat high relative to incomes, which is particularly challenging for entry-level buyers,” NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz said in a statement.

“Builders continue to grapple with excessive regulations, a shortage of lots and lack of skilled labor that are hurting affordability and depressing supply.”

However, the picture was more mixed geographically, with the index declined in the Northeast and West while rising in the Midwest to the highest since October. It was unchanged in the South.

This means all six sub-groups of the Bloomberg Macro Surprise index are now in the red…

We’re gonna need more rate-cuts (or negative-rate mortgages?).

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/cG7i_2a-FRM/homebuilder-sentiment-slips-first-time-2019

Related Posts
One of my fond memories from a spontaneous and unplanned Easter-season tour of Andalusia with
By Damien Gayle and cross-posted from The Guardian Journalists in the UK are less free
“Using extremism as a tool for anybody must not be allowed – any state, no
Butler & Butler (TC) : South Africa’s government is taking cybercrime seriously. The revised version
Source Article from http://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-lessons-from-history/5507798

Hits: 8

"Beyond Ridiculous" – Trader Warns The Fed "Won’t Do Anyone Any Good By Doing Anything"

Sometimes, the hardest thing to do is nothing… and this week’s FOMC decision will be among the hardest The Fed has faced in months – do they once again give stocks exactly what they are demanding, teaching the spoiled child once again that if they scream enough, they’ll get their juicebox; or remain “patient”, reminding stock speculators that risk is real, that uncertainty demands a premium, and that bonds might just be on to something.

Former fund manager and FX trader Richard Breslow appears to be in the latter camp, suggesting that the FOMC won’t do anyone any good at all by doing anything this week.

Everybody wants to be loved. Which makes distinguishing between what the FOMC is likely to do this week and what they should do unusually difficult. They will most likely hope to get away with staking out a middle ground. Promise flexibility and agility without making any firm promises. And the market will just have to live with that. But they won’t be happy. Fixed-income markets are flexing their muscles and want the Fed to bend to their will. It’s a temptation that should be resisted.

Via Bloomberg,

This is no environment where even short-term forecasts carry a lot of weight. And policy makers shouldn’t spend their sparse resources in order to satisfy futures traders who are trying to prove that they are the boss. Should it come to pass that a rate cut is warranted, there will be no difficulty in getting the message out and pulling the trigger. It’s beyond ludicrous that there remains a need to be constantly reassured that the Committee is watching things carefully and stands ready to act.

The concept of an insurance cut isn’t appropriate. It wouldn’t do any good anyway. One and done won’t satisfy anyone and would be economically meaningless. The examples cited from the 1990s have always struck me as not applying. Either on the basis of the restrictive rates or rapidly tightening financial conditions that characterized both instances. Back then, the market needed the psychological boost, the payments mechanism required some greasing and the banks had their hands out. None of that applies now.

You can’t understand the 1995 episode without reference to the rapid and, to resolutely and inexplicably stubborn traders, disastrous tightening of 1994. And this wasn’t an example of the U.S. being an outlier. Take a look at a Short-Sterling or Bankers’ Acceptance chart to get a sense of what was going on globally.

The post-LTCM/Russian default cut was in reaction to hard news that sent markets reeling. There was nothing proactive about it. They didn’t have dots to confuse the issue. Although, it further solidified the notion that the Fed stood perpetually ready to paper over the mistakes of others. And employing over-leverage was a viable strategy.

Inflation expectations remaining low is also a poor excuse to pull the trigger now. It’s certainly not fresh news. Nor will it change by lopping 25, or even 50 basis points, that we can’t afford off of the Fed Funds rate sometime this summer. It may be sacrilege to say so, but the 5yr/5yr measure is merely a financial-market construct that gets too much attention. Where traders are setting this price can change on a dime. Tell me where crude oil will be trading five years from now and guessing where forward inflation swaps will be gets a lot easier.

There is a wide expectation that the word “patient” will be removed from the communique. It’s a shame, because that is exactly what they should be telling the market. The Fed may indeed be central banker to all but going off message to achieve some financial-condition peace is misguided. And it won’t help Europe or Asia either.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0wPYpubvAUg/beyond-ridiculous-trader-warns-fed-wont-do-anyone-any-good-doing-anything

Related Posts
Iran certainly isn't planning on backing down in the face of Washington's accusations
Press TV – Iran has warned the US to stop playing a blame game through “suspicious”
Russia has warned that a build up of US troop in Poland ‘undermines stability in
Congressman Devin Nunes has warned the FBI that “BIG trouble” is coming for corrupt officials
Sputnik – Moscow warns against hasty conclusions and attempts to blame Iran for the incident

Hits: 15

China Takes Responsibility For "Explosion" Near North Korean Border; Denies Nuclear Test Rumors

Update: Chinese authorities are taking responsibility for Monday’s blast, claiming it happened on their side of the border. Reporters pointed out that the magnitude of the blast was much smaller than a nuclear test, and Chinese authorities have advised that this was not a nuclear test.

As one of the reporters who broke the news said, North Korean wouldn’t dare embarrassing the Chinese with a rogue nuclear test so soon after the announcement of President Xi’s historic visit.

* * *

AFP is reporting a “suspected explosion” near the China-North Korea border that appears to bear some resemblance to an eartquake, possibly one triggered by the country’s nuclear program.

Reports about a possible quake could turn out to be far more innocuous than they seem at first. Reports of a quake from March turned out to be unconnected to any new nuclear tests.

Map

In a reading that would seem to suggest an explosion may have been involved, Seismic agency China Earthquake Networks Center reportedly recorded a 1.3 magnitude earthquake with a depth of zero kilometers in Hunchun City, Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, a region bordering North Korea, according to the agency’s website.

The site referred to the incident as a “suspected explosion,” without providing any additional details. Pyongyang hasn’t commented on the possible cause of the blast.

News of the quake almost immediately followed an announcement on Chinese and North Korean state media that President Xi Jinping would make an official state visit to Pyongyang this week in what will be a historic occasion for North Korea. Xi will meet with Kim during the visit on Thursday and Friday (June 20 and 21) during the first trip by a Chinese leader to Pyongyang in 14 years.

Xi

Kim has repeatedly visited with Xi and other senior Chinese officials during trips to Beijing over the last two years. He also recently visited Russia in the first meeting between a North Korean head of state and a post-Soviet Russian leader. But visits to Pyongyang by foreign dignitaries are few and far between.

The visit coincides with the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and North Korea. Media reports claimed the two leaders will ‘exchange views’ on the situation on the Korean Peninsula.

But the timing of the visit – coming at a time when tensions with Beijing are escalating and denuclearization talks with North Korea have stalled following the collapse of talks in Hanoi – likely isn’t a coincidence. The message to Washington is clear: Refuse to play nice on trade, and North Korea could quickly become a geopolitical problem again.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/a9vyFCE7q6Q/explosion-triggers-small-earthquake-near-north-korea-china-border

Related Posts
On May 26, units of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA), the Tiger Forces and the
Major Mandisa Nomcebo Mfeka, 32, was born in Ntuzuma, just outside Durban on South Africa’s
(Natural News) It’s hard to keep track of all the ways that
(Support Free Thought) - In 2017, the state of Arizona went after the
JOURNALISTS IN FRANCE are facing potential jail sentences in an unprecedented case over their

Hits: 18

275-Year-Old Sotheby’s Goes Private In $3.7 Billion Buyout

After seeing its share price collapse over 40% in the past few months, 275-year-old Sotheby’s has been scooped up by French-Israeli businessman Patrick Drahi for $3.7 billion.

Founded in 1744, the auctioneer has long been a signal of imminent economic demise, so the telecom titan’s buyout could well be catching a falling knife into recession, but for now, the avid art collector is excited:

“Sotheby’s is one of the most elegant and aspirational brands in the world,” Drahi said in the statement.

“As a longtime client and lifetime admirer of the company, I am acquiring Sotheby’s together with my family.”

Bloomberg reports the details. Investors will receive $57 in cash per share of Sotheby’s common stock under terms of the agreement, according to a statement Monday from the New York-based company. The offer price represents a 61% premium to Sotheby’s closing price on Friday. The transaction means Sotheby’s is returning to private ownership after 31 years as a public company.

Drahi, 55 – worth $8.6 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index – is the president of Altice Europe, a publicly traded telecommunications business with more than 30 million customers.

Full PR Statement:

Sotheby’s today announced that it has signed a definitive merger agreement to be acquired by BidFair USA, an entity wholly owned by media and telecom entrepreneur as well as art collector, Patrick Drahi.  Under the terms of the agreement, which was approved by Sotheby’s Board of Directors, shareholders, including employee shareholders, will receive $57.00 in cash per share of Sotheby’s common stock in a transaction with an enterprise value of $3.7 billion.  The offer price represents a premium of 61% to Sotheby’s closing price on June 14, 2019, and a 56.3% premium to the company’s 30 trading-day volume weighted average share price.  The transaction would result in Sotheby’s returning to private ownership after 31 years as a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

Tad Smith, Sotheby’s CEO, said, “Patrick Drahi is one of the most well-regarded entrepreneurs in the world, and on behalf of everyone at Sotheby’s, I want to welcome him to the family.  Known for his commitment to innovation and ingenuity, Patrick founded and leads some of the most successful telecommunications, media and digital companies in the world.  He has a long-term view and shares our brand vision for great client service and employing innovation to enhance the value of the company for clients and employees.  This acquisition will provide Sotheby’s with the opportunity to accelerate the successful program of growth initiatives of the past several years in a more flexible private environment. It positions us very well for our future and I strongly believe that the company will be in excellent hands for decades to come with Patrick as our owner.”

Domenico De Sole, Chairman of Sotheby’s Board of Directors, said, “Following a comprehensive review, the Board enthusiastically supports Mr. Drahi’s offer, which delivers a significant premium to market for our shareholders.  After more than 30 years as a public company, the time is right for Sotheby’s to return to private ownership to continue on a path of growth and success.”

“I am honored that the Board of Sotheby’s has decided to recommend my offer,” commented Patrick Drahi.  “Sotheby’s is one of the most elegant and aspirational brands in the world.  As a longtime client and lifetime admirer of the company, I am acquiring Sotheby’s together with my family.  We thank Domenico and the rest of the Sotheby’s Board for its support and look forward to getting started with Tad and the wonderful members of his team to define our future.”

The closing of the deal is subject to customary conditions, including regulatory clearance and shareholder approvals, but is not subject to the availability of financing.  The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2019 following shareholder approval.

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nocU_WYi7h0/275-year-old-sothebys-goes-private-37-billion-buyout

Related Posts
Art lovers and collectors appeared shocked the moment Banksy’s Girl with a Balloon shredded itself
US President Donald Trump has reportedly decided to cancel a planned meeting with British
PEOPLE IN THE El Paso area were stunned to learn on Memorial Day that
A massive database containing contact information of millions of Instagram influencers, celebrities and brand
Asylum Seekers Are Being “Disappeared” in Private Louisiana Jails (Some names in this story have

Hits: 6

Will A False-Flag Iran War Cause A Financial Crisis?

Authored by John Rubino via DollarCollapse.com,

Just a couple of weeks ago the financial world’s biggest worry was the plunging price of oil. Supply was up, stockpiles were building and speculation was pointing towards $40 a barrel, a price at which the fracking/shale oil “miracle” would evaporate. A trillion dollars of related junk debt would default, taking a big part of the leveraged speculating community along for the ride.

Then it all changed. Someone attacked some ships and oil infrastructure in the Middle East, the US and Saudi Arabia accused Iran, and now the fear is that a major regional war will interrupt the flow of oil, sending its price way up and causing a financial crisis at least as severe as a shale oil debt collapse.

This is a legitimate concern, for two reasons.

  • First, oil shocks have happened in the past, most notably during the Arab-Israeli war of the 1970s. So we know what they do, and it isn’t pretty. Gas prices jump, workers can’t afford their commute, the economy slows dramatically and pretty much everyone other than domestic energy companies suffers badly.

  • Second and potentially more serious, the pretext for this war is so blatantly false that it risks destroying what little credibility the US government has left. Think about it: With the US doing everything it can to delegitimize and destabilize Iran while positioning assets for an invasion, Iran’s leaders … start attacking oil tankers in its offshore waters.

Does that make sense? Of course not. Much more likely is that this is yet another false flag – that is, an incident faked to give a pretext for war – and a clumsy one at that.

For readers who aren’t clear on the false flag concept and its ubiquity in geopolitics, here are just a few of the dozens of documented examples:

  • Japanese troops blew up a train track in 1931, blamed it on China and used it to justify the invasion of Manchuria.

  • After taking power, the Nazis burned down their own parliament building and blamed the communists. Later on, they faked attacks on German citizens and blamed the Poles, to justify the subsequent invasion of that country.

  • In 1939 the Soviets shelled one of their own villages and blamed Finland, prior to invading.

  • In 1954 Israeli terrorist cells operating in Egypt bombed U.S. diplomatic facilities, leaving behind evidence implicating Arabs.

  • The CIA hired Iranians in the 1950s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to ignite a rebellion against the democratically-elected government. After the rebellion succeeded the US installed a hand-picked dictator.

  • The US staged a naval engagement — the Gulf of Tonkin incident – and blamed the North Vietnamese, providing a pretext for entering the Vietnam War.

  • The FBI used provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

  • In 1984, Israel faked radio messages that linked Lybia to terrorism. The US bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

  • Russian blew up apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya

The list goes on seemly forever. But these examples are enough to make the twin points that 1) lots of countries employ false flags attacks, and 2) the US is especially fond of them.

There’s just one problem this time: Everyone is on to it. Even the New York Times, which has never met a Mid East war it didn’t love, sees through the deception:

As Trump Accuses Iran, He Has One Problem: His Own Credibility

To President Trump, the question of culpability in the explosions that crippled two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman is no question at all. “It’s probably got essentially Iran written all over it,” he declared on Friday.

The question is whether the writing is clear to everyone else. For any president, accusing another country of an act of war presents an enormous challenge to overcome skepticism at home and abroad. But for a president known for falsehoods and crisis-churning bombast, the test of credibility appears far more daunting.

For two and a half years in office, Mr. Trump has spun out so many misleading or untrue statements about himself, his enemies, his policies, his politics, his family, his personal story, his finances and his interactions with staff that even his own former communications director once said “he’s a liar” and many Americans long ago concluded that he cannot be trusted.

Fact-checking Mr. Trump is a full-time occupation in Washington, and in no other circumstance is faith in a president’s word as vital as in matters of war and peace. The public grew cynical about presidents and intelligence after George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq based on false accusations of weapons of mass destruction, and the doubt spilled over to Barack Obama when he accused Syria of gassing its own people. As Mr. Trump confronts Iran, he carries the burden of their history and his own.

“The problem is twofold for them,” said John E. McLaughlin, a deputy C.I.A. director during the Iraq war. “One is people will always rightly question intelligence because it’s not an exact science. But the most important problem for them is their own credibility and contradictions.”

The task is all the more formidable for Mr. Trump, who himself has assailed the reliability of America’s intelligence agencies and even the intelligence chiefs he appointed, suggesting they could not be believed when their conclusions have not fit his worldview.

All of that can raise questions when international tension flares up, like the explosion of the two oil tankers on Thursday, a provocation that fueled anxiety about the world’s most important oil shipping route and the prospect of escalation into military conflict. When Mr. Trump told Fox News on Friday that “Iran did do it,” he was asking his country to accept his word.

“Trump’s credibility is about as solid as a snake oil salesman,” said Jen Psaki, who was the White House communications director and top State Department spokeswoman under Mr. Obama. “That may work for selling his particular brand to his political base, but during serious times, it leaves him without a wealth of good will and trust from the public that what he is saying is true even on an issue as serious as Iran’s complicity in the tanker explosions.”

Combine these two problems – a Middle East war sending oil much higher, and a near-universal lack of belief in the rationale for that war – and the remaining faith in American competence and honesty might evaporate.

This takes us back to finance, specifically to a monetary system based on fiat currency which depends for its value on our collective trust in the people managing it.

The Fed will respond to an oil crisis by cutting interest rates back to – or below – zero. But will this be met with euphoria as in the past or with skepticism, as happened in Europe recently? If it’s the latter, remember what gold did the last time there was both an oil shock and a loss of faith in government:

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/lZ95wg5dAPI/will-false-flag-iran-war-cause-financial-crisis

Related Posts
Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip will receive a new tranche of financial aid
Simply put, financial independence is defined as having enough wealth
Note: This is Part V in a series of articles adapted from the second Children’s
June 6, 2019 By Press For Truth YouTube just financially purged the Press For Truth
A group of US lawmakers in Congress have introduced legislation that would force Chinese

Hits: 12

The Rise of Facial Recognition Should Scare Us All

By Derrick Broze

In the last ten years, our world has been completely transformed thanks to the exponential growth of digital technology. Technological advances with computer processors and the Internet have quickly advanced our world into one that resembles some of the most well-known sci-fi films and novels. Not a single day passes without a report on an emerging technology or new feature in an already existing product. The last ten years alone have seen rapid growth in information technology, encryption, the medical industry and 3D printing technology, just to name a few.

Unfortunately, as technology is a tool, there are equally frightening developments taking place in the first two decades of the 21st century. Specifically, the ability for governments and private actors to monitor and spy on the activity of the average person has nearly become accepted as the norm. In fact, it has become commonplace to hear Americans respond to warnings of Orwellian futures with the timeless trope, “If you’re not doing anything wrong, there’s nothing to hide!” This is what makes it all the more surprising to see a surplus of recent reports examining the dangers and implications of a world where facial recognition technology is commonplace.

Here’s a small sample of the current headlines related to facial recognition:

Even the Washington Post published a warning titled “Don’t smile for surveillance: Why airport face scans are a privacy trap.”

Questions surrounding the emerging technology have reached enough of a tipping point that just this week, House Democrats questioned the Department of Homeland Security over the use of facial recognition tech on U.S. citizens. The Hill reported that more than 20 House Democrats sent a letter on Friday to the DHS over the Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) use of facial recognition technology at U.S. airports. The Border Patrol claims that they are rolling out the facial recognition program at a number of airports under a congressional mandate and with an executive order from President Donald Trump. Lawmakers say the program was supposed to focus on foreign passengers, not Americans.

The group of lawmakers wrote:

We write to express concerns about reports that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is using facial recognition technology to scan American citizens under the Biometric Exit Program.

The letter to DHS comes shortly after a representative with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) the House Oversight and Reform Committee said that the FBI has access to hundreds of millions of photos that are used for facial recognition searches. Gretta Goodwin, a representative with the GAO, said the FBI uses expansive databases of photos—including from driver’s licenses, passports and mugshots—to search for potential criminals. Goodwin noted that the FBI has a database of 36 million mugshots and access to more than 600 million photos, including access to 21 state driver’s license databases.

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio reminded Ms. Goodwin that the FBI has access to more photos than there are people in the country. “There are only 330 million people in the country,” Jordan stated.

The TSA was also questioned about their use of facial recognition at airports. Austin Gould, the TSA’s assistant administrator on Requirements and Capabilities Analysis, said the facial recognition program has been helpful for travelers. However, critics say the potential benefits of saved time and reducing passenger volume should not override the greater risk to privacy. The TSA plans to have facial recognition tech at the top 20 airports for international travelers by 2021 and at all airports by 2023. The TSA has also previously expressed their desire to scan the face of every single American who enters the airport.

The push back against facial recognition—and biometric technology in general—has moved beyond words in some areas. Most recently, San Francisco became the first city to ban government use of facial recognition. Due to the success in San Francisco, California lawmakers are considering AB 1215, a bill that would extend the ban across the entire state. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) spoke in favor of the bill, stating that the technology has been shown to have disproportionately high error rates for women, the elderly, and people of color. EFF also warned about the dangers of combining face recognition technology with police body cameras.

The editorial board of the Guardian also recently spoke out about the privacy threats, calling the technology “especially inaccurate and prone to bias.” The editorial board also noted that a recent test of Amazon’s facial recognition software by the American Civil Liberties Union found that it falsely identified 28 members of Congress as known criminal. Although the technology is currently dangerous due to its inaccuracy, the Guardian warns:

It may be too late to stop the collection of this data. But the law must ensure that it is not stored and refined in ways that will harm the innocent and, as Liberty warns, slowly poison our public life.

It’s clear that the debate on the benefits and threats of facial recognition technology is not going anywhere anytime soon. It’s up to us as individuals to educate ourselves and inform our peers about the threats to privacy and freedom that are becoming increasingly more apparent everyday.

By Derrick Broze | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on Minds, Twitter, Steemit, and SoMee.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.




Activist Post Daily Newsletter


Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL

Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ActivistPost/~3/B4veHvxHYUc/the-rise-of-facial-recognition-should-scare-us-all.html

Related Posts
As the term suggests, ‘keyword stuffing’ is about stuffing your
  The UK's decision to extradite WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange to the US should be taken
  Former "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart's demeanor on Capitol Hill Tuesday was vastly different from
(Natural News) Did you know that pears are related to apples? Like
Blog of Staś Staś Source Article from https://stanstasblog.wordpress.com/2019/06/07/britain-should-not-have-fought-in-the-first-world-war/

Hits: 29

Is There An Ultimate Advertisement For 5G?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

It never fails to ‘impress’ me how academia, business and industry go out of their ways to hype innovation in science, products and/or services, so consumers can’t resist them, then rush to purchase and use them when made available for sale.

However, there’s another ‘thing’ that really impresses me the wrong way and that is when corporations go ‘hell bent’ to prove their products are safe in varied ways, except two which, of course, are the most important of all, in my opinion as a retired healthcare professional:

1 – There are NO adverse health effects to humans, pets and wildlife.

[We know that microwave RFs produce non-ionizing radiation adverse health effects, which no vested-interest corporate entity apparently wants to investigate, other than independent scientists and academics, who are finding a ‘boat load’ of issues or problems.

Strange as it may seem, Dr. Henry Lai, University of Washington, did research on “Radiofrequency: Does Funding Matter” and found the following data:

Non-industry studies: 70% harmful effects; 30% no effects

Industry studies: 32% harmful effects; 68% no effects]

2 – There are/were NO ecological or environmental impact studies done, which should be required before the hyper-rush of the 5G experiment involving all life forms is implemented.

[Previous generations of microwave energy bandwidths up to 4G did not have such studies performed —BIG mistake—so 5G automatically now is considered to be a “shoo in.”  Where are the Monarch butterflies?  What’s happening to birds and bees losing their ‘navigation’ capabilities?]

“Not so fast,” is the resounding global chorus from concerned individuals, especially those who are electromagnetic hypersensitive [EHS].  Want to know what EHS is, or more about it?  Please read this link written by Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD.

Dr. Magda Havas, PhD, an environmental toxicologist at Trent University, Canada, made a presentation at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which you can experience by watching the video below.

Magda Havas Talks at NIEHS May 9, 2016 on Electrosmog & EHS
15:23 minutes

https://youtu.be/fqMCjEs9oxE?t=21

The EHS population and demographics increase daily as humans realize their health has taken a downward spiral since they were forced to take AMI Smart Utility Meters in addition to using cell phones and other microwave tech products.  Dr. Havas claims about 3% of humans have severe EHS symptoms, and 35% of the population has mild to moderate symptoms, i.e., anywhere from 9 to a 100 million people!  And governments aren’t concerned!  How about the New World Order governance?

Profit outside the rigged system! Protect yourself from tyranny and economic collapse. Learn to live free and spread peace!

Counter Markets Newsletter – Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom

Ah!  That’s their ultimate goal for total control!

How come Lloyds of London won’t insure anything to do with EMFs?

Dr. Havas, at the end of her NIEHS talk, plays a voice over song about men carrying live cell phones in their pants pockets and their “Johnsons,” a ditty you won’t want to miss.

So who are we to believe about Gigahertz (GHz) frequencies at which Wi-Fi operates propaganda?  What will happen when 5G produces faster, more powerful Wi-Fi; ‘smart’ homes and ‘smarter’ everything else but dumbed-down humans; and the coveted of all high tech ‘productions’, the Internet of Things?

One university in the Netherlands believes it can produce, and will have, answers to all concerns consumers have.  It’s the University of Groningen.  Below is the video produced, and what I interpret as a grandiose sales pitch for 5G.

The north of the Netherlands is the ideal testing ground for 5G applications
3:10 minutes

https://youtu.be/WNYwf8_6eGY?t=48

What do you think?

Resource:

Electro-Magnetic Fields From Mobile Phones: Recent Developments
https://www.smombiegate.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/smombie-gate-EMF-Final-November-2010.pdf

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice, plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer health ​issues researcher ​and holistic health advocate since the late 1970s; she continues researching and writing in retirement. Her career in holistic healthcare began in the early 1970s when she had to save, and restructure, her life resulting from having “fallen through the allopathic medical paradigm cracks.”

Catherine has written numerous books. The following can be purchased on Amazon books:

Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities (2016)
Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines (2013)
A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments (2012)
Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009)
Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on Minds, Twitter, Steemit, and SoMee.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.




Activist Post Daily Newsletter


Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL

Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ActivistPost/~3/aLDmzrondbY/is-there-an-ultimate-advertisement-for-5g.html

Related Posts
Electronic Pollution is Killing Us We live in an increasingly irradiated environment (radiation soup) with
(Natural News) In 1984, Apple launched a compelling and ironic commercial that
May 21st, 2019 By Jim Stempel Guest Writer for Wake Up World The stream of
April 18th, 2019 By Aletheia Luna Guest writer for Wake Up World According to ancient Hindu tradition,
  “Follow the Money”   Russophobia, A WMD (Weapon Of Mass Deception) JEAN RANC |

Hits: 46

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes