The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Zionism is NOT about a homeland for Jews - it's to establish the base of a One World Government, where the Jews tyrannically rule the goyim worldwide

If I converted to Buddhism, does that make me Chinese? If I converted to Hinduism, does that make me Indian? When Khazarians (Turks) converted to Judaism in 740 BC and stole the true Negro Hebrew identity, and turned them into slaves... did that make the counterfeit Jews Hebrew? Well, the Jew World Order seems to think so. They crucified Jesus Christ for exposing them.

The invention of the terrorist by our kosher governments, to keep us in fear, and to justify raping the middle-east and slaughtering millions of innocent families for power and control... just like they have done in the past, in every country that they infiltrated.

Khazarian-Babylonian Mafia known as the JEW

Every Religion and Church has been infiltrated by the Jews. How do you know? ... if your Church has not discussed the below phrases by Christ... then it has been compromised.

Why Are Jews At The Head Of ALL Islamic Institutions?

Why Are Jews At The Head Of ALL Islamic Institutions?


On Thursday 08 December 2016, the French newspaper Le Figaro published an article about the highly anticipated creation of the  Foundation of Islam (in French).

It is has now been officially launched with the new Interior Minister’s warm blessings. The president of this new ‘Islamic’ foundation is Jean-Pierre Chevènement and its main financier is Serge Dassault. 

Serge Dassault


He is an israel-firster jew and a very well known figure in France. He is an arm-dealer and the CEO of the main French military industrial complex, The Groupe Dassault which has been praised time and again by the jews for its vital role during the Six Days War.

He also happens to own some of France’s main newspapers and the ‘arabic’ radio station called ‘Radio Beur FM’.

His career is paved with scandals of money laundering and tax evasion but that did not prevent him from becoming a senator. 

Jean-Pierre Chevènement

Jean-Pierre Chevènement

A jew, he is also a known political figure. Having held several different offices (Defense, Interior), he distinguished himself for his very close bond and work with the several jewish institution dictating French politics.

He is married to Nisa Grunberg, the daughter of the former head of the jewish community of Cairo, Egypt. His brother-in-law, Hermann Grunberg is the former CEO of the ‘Franco-American’ jewish bank, Lazard Bank.

His son Raphael, a script-writer is also an israel-firster and openly arch-zionist.

Raphael Chevènement

The current president of the ‘French Council Of The Muslim Faith’ and a defacto board member of the new Foundation of Islam, Anwar Kbibech, employee of franco-israeli billionaire Patrick Drahi, welcomed the creation of this new Foundation, stressing the importance that the training and appointment of all future Imams in France must be done and co-supervised by Jews. In fact, this is already the case, except that now, it is out in the open.

In other words, we have a unique situation in France where a jew, Jean-Pierre Chevènement is being appointed the new Calif of French Muslims with another jew, Dassault, as his banker.

Reminder 1: The Institute Of The Arabic World (Institut du Monde Arabe) is also managed by jews, from bottom to top, with gay, suspected pedophile jew Jack Lang as its president.

Reminder 2: The Rector of the Grand Mosque of Paris, Dalil Boubakeur, is a well known free-mason,an active reformist of Islam, a staunch enemy of ‘traditional’ Islam, a dear friend of Judaism and the jews to the point that he is now known in France as DAVID BOUBAKEUR.  


Our Communist Judeo Society

Our Communist Judeo Society

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

How the Jews swindle our Taxes and Economies

Gay Homosexual Jews are GODS

Gay Homosexual Jews are GODS

Jews Control Islam and We’ll Use It to Destroy the West.

Jews Control Islam and We’ll Use It to Destroy the West.

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack and Fake Muslim Groups

Jews behind every Terrorist Attack and Fake Muslim Groups

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Jews Control All Governments in Every Country

Jews Control All Governments in Every Country

Muslim Mother confronting the ISRAEL CIA ISIS Terrorists

Muslim Mother confronting the ISRAEL CIA ISIS Terrorists


London Bridge staged Terrorist Attack by Government

London Bridge staged Terrorist Attack by Government


Jews faking the News again

Jews faking the News again

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas

How the Jews mock Jesus Christians and Christmas


Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist

Confessions of a CIA economic hitman Terrorist


Are you a real Christian?

Are you a real Christian?

Or are you led by the devil himself.

What did the Jews do to Germany in 1930?

What did the Jews do to Germany in 1930?

More Jewish Terrorism

Special Notice to all Jews

Special Notice to all Jews

Israel The Promised Land of Global Jewish Organized Crime

What World-famous Men have said About the Jews

What World-famous Men have said About the Jews


The Jews are the only people in the world who have found hostility in every country in which they settled in any numbers. The big question is — WHY?

Today it is taught in the schools that “Anti-Semitism” began in Germany in the 1930s after which they were deported. What is not studied is the fact that at one time or other the Jews have been expelled from every nation in Europe! When the Jews first began to immigrate to America the early colonialists in New York, Charleston and Savannah tried to ban their entry. Benjamin Franklin pleaded with the members of the Continental Congress to enter a specific ban against Jewish immigration into the U. S. Constitution to bar them for all time to come.

The Jews claim that they are “only” a religion. The truth is that the Jews are a RACE of Khazarian / Babylonian Mongol Turks. Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists — they still claim to be Jews — members of the Jewish race! Every race has inherited traits. In the case of the Jews they include trading, money-changing, Murder, Satanism, Child sacrifices, Pedophilia, Beastiality, Slavery, usury, and a loathing for “productive labor” which is scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their “bible” called “THE TALMUD.”

The Jews have not changed since the days when Jesus Christ took up a whip and drove “the money changers out of the Temple.” Jews have always united to form monopolies. Today they control all the department store chains, Music industry, Hollywood, TV, Radio Industry, News and Media Industry, Organised Crime, Slave trade, Drug Trafficking, Governments, Large Corporations, Medical industry, Terrorism, Drug Industry, Oil Industry, Creating new viruses in Labs, creating more Poverty, creating famine, Child trafficking, Organ trafficking, Sex slaves, Pedophilia networks, Blood diamonds, Ivory industry, Exotic animals, Fur industry,and specialty shops along with the lucrative jewelry and animal fur trade. Jews dominate the fields of all precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, tin, lead, etc. They will always ban together to drive Gentile competitors out of business… by defaming them, or slaughtering them.

Today America is being flooded with Jewish immigrants from Russia and even 20,000 per year leave Israel for the U. S. — all with dollar signs in their eyes. Jews have used their vaunted money-power to seize control of every Political Party in every country. Today they own nearly every Corporation around the Globe. While only 3% of the population, the Jews control over 90% of the nation’s wealth and this percentage rises every year. They are the only racial group totally organized to work for political domination over the planet.

Opposition to the Jews did not begin in Germany but dates back before the birth of Christ over 2,000 years ago! Study the statements made by “The world’s greatest men.” They reveal why the “wandering Jews” have made enemies out of every host country that ever accepted them.

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman, writer.

“Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.” (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to “speak softly” shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote: “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher. “The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors.” (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form: “The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.” (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian.Observed that Jews treated other people as enemies and inferiors. “Usury” is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described himself as a “barking dog” when dealing with Jews: “Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor, shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect those who feed them, and I, who am feed by the poor, shall I see them robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?” (E. Flornoy, Le Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his “On the Governance of the Jews,” he wrote: “The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9 “There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance . . . There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease.”

H. H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 “The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute.”

W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919 “The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?”

POPE CLEMENT VIII “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.”

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization, page 163 “Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has persistently shown himself ungrateful . . . The Jews have always formed a rebellious element in every state.”

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278 “The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.”

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. – then answered the Jews — ” (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William Hazlet, page 43 “But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them.”

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding, pages 114 – 115 “Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity.” Paul said: “You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism — how furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of may own age among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of my forefathers.” (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation).

While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism are filled with hate for Christians. Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination UNDER high sounding words that have a “RELIGIOUS” ring in the ears of Christians. The Jews use such “religious” sounding words as “the Jewish faith,” “the Jewish religion,” “Jewish spiritual values,” “Jewish religious doctrines,” and like phrases which deceive and lead the unlearned into total equanimity. Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, and the destruction of Christianity.

REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count Cherep-Spiridovich’s book The Secret World Government, page 194 “If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian principle which has protected him.”

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D. “The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John 7:1 “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him.”

M. H. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir “The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains “a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear.” “In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of “attack on public morals” and “pornography.” In delivering its verdict, the Court declared ‘INTER ALIA:’ “The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning.” QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 – 230 A. D.) Latin Church Father “The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian actions.”

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death, February, 1546 “Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much harm . . . You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day… for that reason you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions. Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings.”

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 – 1789) “Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.”

(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that “The Talmud is the real “bible” of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read “THE TALMUD UNMASKED” for the full shocking details.)

DIDEROT, DENIS. 18th century French scholar. His famous ENCYCLOPEDIE, the bible of the pre-revolutionary French “enlightenment,” has often been complained of by Jewish writers as ‘anti-Semitic.’ Some of Diderot’s other writings are likewise unfriendly: “And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear … Go, take back your books and remove yourselves from me. (LA MOISADE) [The Talmud] taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to regard them as savage beasts, to push them over the precipice . . . to kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible imprecations against them. (JUIFS)

NESTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370 “The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism . . .The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible.”

F. TROCASE, in Jewish Austria “No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy.”

COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian general “The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country. The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides.”

MOHAMMED, in the Koran “Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit.”

BACON, FRANCIS. 16th century British writer, politician. In his The New Atlantis, he remarked that Jews “hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against the people among whom they live.” He also disapproved of non-Jewish usurers as “Judaizers” who would wear “tawny bonnets” like Jews.

LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer. “They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther . . . On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope.

1). The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts . . . Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: “When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews.

2). Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.

3). A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile! If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself! Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service . . . And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants — yea, their cattle! I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews . . . Should someone think I am saying too much — I am saying much too little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish as all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks . . . No heathen has done such things and none would to so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses — as he possesses the Jews. Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the people of God. Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1,400 years ago during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem! . . . Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.

Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people? . . . Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country. For as heard before, God’s wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away with them! How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity! What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (From THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES) Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself. Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk.”

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co. “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a “CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,” at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. “I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America. “The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race — such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ — not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.) The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by “their worships” for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were ‘poor and persecuted:’ ” . . . and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company.” (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY) THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization “use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.” (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman. “Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in.” (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS) “Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people.” (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher. “There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is their reward.” (New York speech, October 30, 1937)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman. Opposed admission of Jewish immigrants to England because: “They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world… The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March 19. 1925) “Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face.”

WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosophy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish “TALMUD” which is the “bible” of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the “NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN” of February 3, 1949.)

CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician. In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the “national Jews” of Russia, he said: “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNYIN, MIKHYL. 19th century Russian revolutionary. “Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschild’s. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence . . . In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well — this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschild’s appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks . . . (Pol Emique contres les Juifs) This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers — overwhelmingly Jewish – since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described “Bolshevik banker” who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’ commissars.

WILHELM II. German Kaiser. “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949 “The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, New York speech, October 30, 1937 “When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top — And this is no hazard.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937 “The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.”

A. HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7 “History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals.”

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.”

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923 “The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.”

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10 “B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of “the Covenant,” or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government — which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.”

VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, quoted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10) “There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.) . . . Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.”

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316) “Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.”

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921 “Jews have always controlled the business . . . The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada . . . is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.”

M. OUDENDYK, the Netherlands’ Minister to Petrograd on September 6, 1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919 “. . . I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is till raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

A. N. FIELD, in Today’s Greatest Problem “Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one.”

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25 “The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom.”

A. N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208 “The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greatest physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history . . . The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl’s “terrible (Jewish) power of the purse”) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison.”

H. H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937 “Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918.”

HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real “Crime,” page 6 “Communism and Judaism are one and the same.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 “There is nothing else in Communism — a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a “paradise on earth.”

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is — a Jewish scheme invented by Jews — that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.”

REV. KENNETH GOFF, in STILL ‘TIS OUR ANCIENT FOE, page 99 “The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization — as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution.”


SYLVESTER I. Condemned Jewish anti-Christian activity.

GREGORY I (‘The Great’). Protested wholesale circumcision of Christian slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls to Oriental and African buyers.

GREGORY VIII. Forbade Jews to have power over Christians, in a letter to Alfonso VI of Castile.

GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing “every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.”

BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared:

“The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing the truth.”

JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned “everywhere” and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings — an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.

PAUL IV. Cum nimis absurdim (1555) promulgated immediately after his coronation, was a powerful condemnation of Jewish usury. It embodies a model legal code to curb Jewish power that was recommended to all communities.

PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal States.

GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews “continue to plot horrible crimes” against Christians “with daily increasing audacity.”

CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum 1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce and “systematical despoliation” of the Christian through usury.

PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by Jewish writers.

BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against “the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder.” This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. — And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician. While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews: “I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold. (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)

1). The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.

2). Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.

3). No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits. By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American soldier. In a letter from Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote: “I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use — the purchase of arms and ammunition . . . Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it.” (The Sherman Letters)

ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military man. As did Generals ULYSSES S. GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish ‘carpetbagging’ cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote: “The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away.”

OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century American architect, historian. “A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out of business many of the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For other views on Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES S. GRANT and MARK TWAIN.)

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer. “In the U.S. cotton states, after the war . . . the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

1). The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm — like Joseph.

2). In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics — but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants — but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event . . . I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics. (“Concerning the Jews,” Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married — or was married by — the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete “Concerning the Jews” from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories.

1). Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a legitimate question whether there was any preplanning for the wholesale — and retail — economic looting done by mainly Jewish carpetbaggers after the war.

2). We have cited a host of other writers on the terrible economic depredation that Jewry visited on the people of Tzarist Russia.

ERNEST RENAN, French historian “The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but — and this is the most important factor — ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew . . . In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him.”

GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881 “The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.”

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer. “The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.” (Treatise on the Gods) The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht . . . (“not wanted.”) “I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish . . .”

“The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.” (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist. “This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925) This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

WAGNER, RICHARD. 19th century German composer. “The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a live of art-enabling import . . . “So long as the separate art of music had a real organic life-need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only when a body’s inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the power of judgment in it — yet merely to destroy it. On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and falsification of our highest culture-tendencies. Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. (Judaism in Music)

SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist. “Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World . . . ”

FITZGERALD, F. SCOTT. 20th century American novelist. “Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the passers from intent eyes — eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride, with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York — he could not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people — the little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over with hawks’ eyes and a bee’s attention to detail – they [were Jews.]

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet. “The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer. After a sting as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews, Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of Jews. “The Jew’s hand was ever, like Ishmael’s, against every man but those belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind, whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law contributed to inflame his wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.”

DREISER, THEODORE. 20th century American writer. “New York to me is a scream — a Kyke’s dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5, 1922) ” “Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means — and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)”

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer. “The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel.” (The Outline of History)

“Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people.” (The Anatomy of Frustration)

“A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.” (Letter of November 11, 1933)

Wells was in the habit of referring to KARL MARX as “a shallow third-rate Jew,” and “a lousy Jew” in private correspondence. (Norman MacKenzie, H. G. Wells)

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer. Wednesday, August 23, 1939 “We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.”

Thursday, May 1, 1941 “The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.” (The Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29, 1939 “The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish influence throughout the world.”

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher. “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with . . . How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen? A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden) For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have cause great evil to many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. (“Hebraer,” in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general. “The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes . . .” “Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity . . . “They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.”

“The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it . . . The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.” (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)

“Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.” (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

1). Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his license every year.

2). Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)

DE GAULLE, CHARLES. 20th century French politician. Addressing the Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27, 1967, he observed: “The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people, self-confident and domineering.”

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist. “I saw in ‘the wandering Jew’ the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.” (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: “Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners . . . Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: “It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.”

FRANCO, FRANCISCO. 20th century Spanish statesman. In his victory speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared: “Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day.”

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 – November 1, 1937 “In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” . . . “I implore all of you to be accurate — call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is your reward.”

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate. “The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty — not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.” (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)

HOUSTON STEWART CHAMBERLAIN, world famed author of Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Vol. I, page 337 “The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew! . . . I have searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of finding — naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of the suffering Savior — but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no longer a Jew, but a denier of Judaism. And while we find, even in Mohammed’s Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ “the new birth with the death mask,” which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the Cross he assures us that “the Jews do not require this convulsive emotion for their spiritual improvement,” and adds, “particularly not among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities.” His comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a “dead dog” that lies “buried in a dunghill.” Besides, the Jews have taken care to issue in the latter part of the nineteenth century several editions (naturally in Hebrew) of the so-called “censured passages” from the Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to our scorn and hatred as a “fool,” “sorcerer,” “profane person,” “idolater,” “dog,” “bastard,” “child of lust,” etc.: so, too, His sublime Mother.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s “Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth — and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.”

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England “England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship — a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life.”

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman, wrote in his dairy that in 1946 “Truman was “exasperated” over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added “Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that ‘Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?’ Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.”

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYANT, three times the Democratic Party candidate for President said: “New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous, mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of conscience . . . This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed.”

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895 “The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.”

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician. “One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer. In an interview, he assailed “the Zionist mafia” monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer. “Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race . . .” “The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous — cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.” (Essai sur le Moeurs)

“You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.” (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his ‘anti-Semitism.’ Examen des Quelques Objections . . . dans L’Essai sur le Moeurs.)

“You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.” (“Juif,” Dictionnaire Philosophique)

“I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made . . . But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.” (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)

“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.” (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer. In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER. “Jews! To the heights of your Sinai . . . I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!!” repute.htm

Netanyahu’s Likud to vote against the creation of a Palestinian state on Tuesday

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,752 other followers

Source Article from

Philip Weiss: The Role of Jewish Democrats in Bill That Could Imprison Israel Boycotters for 20 Years

In a recent post on the Mondoweiss website, Journalist Philip Weiss examines the Israel Anti-Boycott Act that would punish those boycotting Israel with a minimum civil penalty of $250,000 and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years in prison. The legislation is being sponsored by both conservatives and liberals. 

Weiss says that the Israel lobby is responsible for the legislation and indicates that it is Jewish Zionists, not Christian Zionists, who are the main wielders of power on the issue.

He writes: “Ultimately, this is a story about the fight inside Jewish life over Zionism and support for Israel. I believe we will win this fight, and that this legislation will help us. The legislation will shock many civil-liberties-loving Jews. The Intercept story will force legislators to redraft the legislation.” 

Weiss reports that “a year ago Stephanie Schriock of Emily’s List and JJ Goldberg of the Forward described the ‘gigantic’ and ‘shocking’ degree of the Democratic Party’s reliance on Jewish wealth for campaign contributions.”

Below is an excerpt from Weiss’s article:

Bill making it a federal crime to support BDS sends shockwaves through progressive community.

…This bill is the work of the Israel lobby. It was drafted by one of the lead Israel-support groups, AIPAC– “one of the most powerful, and pernicious, lobbying forces in the country,” as the Intercept puts it. Greenwald and Grim raise the issue of the American people’s interest:

“In what conceivable sense is it of benefit to Americans to turn them into felons for the crime of engaging in political activism in protest of a foreign nation’s government?

I would answer that question frankly by explaining that the bill is about the Israel lobby’s presence inside the Democratic Party, and therefore of the role of conservative Zionist Jews inside the Democratic Party. The efforts by many to claim that the Israel lobby is also evangelical Christians ~ (lately Paul Pillar at Lobelog) ~ is pure deception when it comes to the Democratic Party.

Evangelical Christians don’t tell Schumer and Gillibrand how to vote on stem-cell research or abortion, and they don’t tell them how to vote on Israel either. No, the organized Jewish community does.

Older Jews tend to be huge ideological supporters of Israel. Ben Cardin goes to synagogues and tells other older Jews that Palestinian statehood is “anti-American.” Schumer has called himself the “Schomer” or guardian of Israel and said that there is a Jewish interest in supporting Israel. A year ago Stephanie Schriock of Emily’s List and JJ Goldberg of the Forward described the “gigantic” and “shocking” degree of the Democratic Party’s reliance on Jewish wealth for campaign contributions.

Ultimately, this is a story about the fight inside Jewish life over Zionism and support for Israel. I believe we will win this fight, and that this legislation will help us. The legislation will shock many civil-liberties-loving Jews. The Intercept story will force legislators to redraft the legislation.

And, most important: a diverse coalition of human-rights-loving Democrats are enraged by this legislation and are organizing against AIPAC’s role in the party. Call it the Keith Ellison wing, the Sanders wing ~ young Jews, young Latinos, blacks, women [& numerous Christians]  ~ they want a more progressive policy on Israel and many of them support BDS. Bernie Sanders did not attend the AIPAC conference in 2016, because his base opposed such pandering, and that base is fighting for the heart of the party.

Lastly, remember this story and the frank declaration of support for a foreign nation by legislators the next time you hear about the insidious influence of Russia in our politics. As the Intercept notes,

“Among the co-sponsors of the bill are several of the politicians who have become political celebrities by positioning themselves as media leaders of the anti-Trump #Resistance, including three California House members who have become heroes to Democrats and staples of the cable news circuit: Ted Lieu, Adam Schiff, and Eric Swalwell.”

Adam Schiff is worthy of special mention, as David Bromwich points out to me. “He is among the scores of obedient Democrats co-sponsoring the bill. Schiff has a high reputation in liberal circles, but he voted for the Iraq war, supported the Saudi intervention in Yemen, said the assassination of Qaddafi was ‘an end to the first chapter of another popular revolution,’ and approved of Trump’s bombing of Syria. On foreign policy he is a believer in the conventional wisdom of the Cold War and the War on Terror, that’s all; but his opinions have taken on an outsize importance since he is now routinely accepted as the party’s outstanding authority on Russia. He knows Russia about as well as he knew Iraq and Libya.”


The Intercept: U.S. Lawmakers Seek to Criminalize Support for BDS

Schumer, ‘guardian of Israel,’ calls anti-Zionism a form of antisemitism [videos]

Israel’s 24-7 ‘War’ on Palestine Rights Movement Advances Anti-boycott Legislation, Torpedoes Events

The Sleazy Origins of Russia-gate

July 22, 2017

, , , , ,

This entry was posted on 07/22/2017, 9:18 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Source Article from

Linkin Park Chester Bennington’s Wife Allegedly Hacked On Twitter Hours After His Death: ‘He Didn’t Kill Himself’

FILE PHOTO: Chester Bennington of Linkin Park and wife Talinda arrive at the 2012 Billboard Music Awards in Las Vegas, Nevada, May 20, 2012. REUTERS/Steve Marcus/File Photo

Shortly after Linkin Park’s vocalist Chester Bennington’s death, his wife, Talinda Bentley was allegedly targeted by ruthless hackers.

On Friday morning, just hours after Bennington’s suspected suicide, Talinda’s Twitter account seemed to be taken over by hackers. According to reports, Bentley’s official Twitter page posted chilling claims about the rock star’s death.

Apparently, the hackers tweeted at least five offensive messages amid the family’s grief. In the now deleted tweets, the vicious perpetrators alleged that Talinda had been unfaithful to Chester, revealing that she had an affair with her husband’s band mate Mike Shinoda.

Another tweet claimed that Talinda was not hacked, adding that she only loved Chester for his money

Aside from infidelity issues, the alleged hacker also revealed some disturbing claims about Chester’s death. In another tweet from Talinda’s account, the hackers suggested that Bennington did not really kill himself and that the singer was already dead before being hanged to make it appear like a suicide.

“He didn’t kill himself, he was already did [sic] before he hung himself, I have proof.”

However, the hackers made a contradicting tweet that added more confusion to the situation. Just a few hours after Bentley’s Twitter account was alleged that Bennington did not kill himself, the page posted another tweet claiming that Talinda “encouraged him to kill himself” adding that “no one cared for him.

Shortly after Chester Bennington’s death, his wife, Talinda Bentley was reportedly hacked on Twitter. [Image by Stephen Shugerman/Getty Images]

As of press time, Mike Shinoda and the Bennington family have yet to comment about the hacking incidents as well as the malicious tweets from Talinda’s account. Chester’s wife has yet to confirm whether or not her Twitter was indeed taken over by hackers. She also has not released an official statement about the singer’s death.

On the other hand, a representative for Linkin Park confirmed that they are currently dealing with the security breach following the supposed hack.


Source Article from

As Paperwork Goes Missing, Private Student Loan Debts May Be Wiped Away

A City College of New York graduate last year. At least $5 billion in private student loans are at the heart of a legal dispute. Credit Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Tens of thousands of people who took out private loans to pay for college but have not been able to keep up payments may get their debts wiped away because critical paperwork is missing.

The troubled loans, which total at least $5 billion, are at the center of a protracted legal dispute between the student borrowers and a group of creditors who have aggressively pursued them in court after they fell behind on payments.

Judges have already dismissed dozens of lawsuits against former students, essentially wiping out their debt, because documents proving who owns the loans are missing. A review of court records by The New York Times shows that many other collection cases are deeply flawed, with incomplete ownership records and mass-produced documentation.

Some of the problems playing out now in the $108 billion private student loan market are reminiscent of those that arose from the subprime mortgage crisis a decade ago, when billions of dollars in subprime mortgage loans were ruled uncollectible by courts because of missing or fake documentation. And like those troubled mortgages, private student loans — which come with higher interest rates and fewer consumer protections than federal loans — are often targeted at the most vulnerable borrowers, like those attending for-profit schools.

At the center of the storm is one of the nation’s largest owners of private student loans, the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts. It is struggling to prove in court that it has the legal paperwork showing ownership of its loans, which were originally made by banks and then sold to investors. National Collegiate’s lawyers warned in a recent legal filing, “As news of the servicing issues and the trusts’ inability to produce the documents needed to foreclose on loans spreads, the likelihood of more defaults rises.”

National Collegiate is an umbrella name for 15 trusts that hold 800,000 private student loans, totaling $12 billion. More than $5 billion of that debt is in default, according to court filings. The trusts aggressively pursue borrowers who fall behind on their bills. Across the country, they have brought at least four new collection cases each day, on average — more than 800 so far this year — and tens of thousands of lawsuits in the past five years.


Source Article from

MUST WATCH: New Information on DEADLY 5G!

Videographer, cindy gray, just ran across some NEW information Today about 5G, that everyone NEEDS to KNOW about …It will be worth your time!

Source Article from

8 Things People Don’t Realize You’re Doing Because You’re Highly Awakened

When we are awakened, we are more conscious of ourselves, spiritually, physically, and otherwise. However, there are a number of things that awakened individuals do that the unawakened individual may perceive as strange behavior.

And we aren’t discouraging anyone from allowing their eccentricities to flourish. On the contrary, we applaud the awakened individual.

However, our endeavor is to bring awareness to your awakening, and in order to do that, we need to show how you may do things, well, differently.

1. You question everything.

While most people accept life for what it is, you aren’t content with that. Instead, you question everything.

2. You are aware that you are onto something, and you are trying to awaken others to that truth.

You can tell that you have discovered something special, and you want to share it with the world. However, everyone is not as accepting of your truth.

3. You see signs in everything.

From an animal on your path to a strange occurrence in your town, you can sense the bigger picture.

4. You feel everything.

Somehow, you can sense the feelings of others more than ever, and it is beginning to creep people out.

5. You trust your intuition more.

You know from personal experience that your intuition is normally right. Because of this, you have learned to trust yourself more.

6. You trust the universe.

You know that things always work out somehow, and because of that, you trust the universe.

7. You shift the conversation to heavier topics.

As we become more awakened, we strive for realism. To us, realness is equated with getting to the bottom of every situation, and the only way to do that is to better understand it.

8. You need more alone time.

While your friends and family may perceive this as anti-social behavior, it is actually normal to need alone time. Especially, if you are shifting towards an awakening.

Is this you?

Source: Awareness Act

Source Article from

These 16 Restaurants Have The MOST Antibiotics In Their Meat! Avoid Them!

By now you probably know quite well how much of the mass-produced meat in this country is laced with antibiotics, but we’re here with a list of the worst restaurant chain offenders.

A collaborative new report recently ranked the 25 largest US fast food and causal restaurant chains based on their policies and practices when it comes to antibiotics in their food.

The following restaurant chains received F grades in antibiotic practices:


  1. KFC
  2. Dunkin’ Donuts
  3. Sonic
  4. Olive Garden
  5. Denny’s
  6. Starbucks
  7. Jack In The Box
  8. Burger King
  9. Applebees
  10. Domino’s Pizza
  11. Chilli’s
  12. Little Caesars
  13. Buffalo Wild Wings
  14. Dairy Queen
  15. Arby’s
  16. IHOP

Source: Organic & Healthy

Source Article from

Donald Trump Orders DOJ To Takedown Darknet Markets

By Aaron Kesel

During a press briefing at the Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed that president Donald Trump ordered the DOJ to go after “organized transnational cyber crime organizations operated on the darknet.”

“Donald Trump gave us several directives. One is to dismantle transnational criminal organizations. That is what we are announcing today. Dismantling of the largest dark website in the world by far,” Sessions said.

Sessions stated that the recent takedown of AlphaBay, a darknet market similar to Silk Road, is part of the battle against opioid addiction in the United States, adding that one American dies of a drug overdose every eleven minutes.

He then pointed out that he knew of several Americans killed by drugs sold on AlphaBay, and gave examples: “One victim was just 18 years old when, in February, she overdosed on a powerful synthetic opioid which she had bought on AlphaBay. The drug was shipped right to her house, through the mail,” Sessions said.

“This is likely one of the most important criminal investigations of this entire year,” he added.

Sessions expressed that darknet marketplaces and criminals aren’t safe from law enforcement, stating:

This case, pursued by dedicated agents and prosecutors, says you are not safe. You cannot hide. We will find you, dismantle your organization and network. And we will prosecute you.

In his closing statement, he said he believes the American people are now safer from identity fraud, malware, and drugs thanks to the takedown of AlphaBay and Hansa, two of the largest darknet marketplaces.

“Make no mistake, the forces of law and justice face a new challenge from the criminals and transnational criminal organizations who think they can commit their crimes with impunity using the dark net.  The dark net is not a place to hide. The Department will continue to find, arrest, prosecute, convict, and incarcerate criminals, drug traffickers, and their enablers wherever they are. We will use every tool we have to stop criminals from exploiting vulnerable people and sending so many Americans to an early grave. I believe that because of this operation, the American people are safer – safer from the threat of identity fraud and malware, and safer from deadly drugs,” Sessions said.

“Transnational organized crime poses a serious threat to our national and economic security,” Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said. “Whether they operate in broad daylight or on the dark net, we will never stop working to find and stop these criminal syndicates.  We want to thank our international partners and those at the Department of Justice, the DEA and the IRS-CI for their hard work in demonstrating what we can do when we stand together,” he added.

Others have argued that AlphaBay gave people a way to peer review drugs, and these drug market places might have actually offered a safer buying option for addicts.

The Grugq wrote on Medium, “Great job ridding the world of a non-violent drug distribution channel that virtually eliminated risk and significantly reduced harm to addicts.”

AlphaBay’s alleged founder Alexandre Cazes was arrested on July 5 in Thailand at his home outside Bangkok and is alleged to have committed suicide shortly after while in a Thai jail on July 12.

Hansa’s operators were arrested and the website was taken over by authorities and controlled for a month leading to the potential that police have additional information on Hansa’s customers. Meaning we will likely hear of future arrests as the investigation into both Darknet websites continue.

As with the nature of the dark web, there will only be more marketplaces that pop up and subsequent takedowns to come under the Trump administration.

Watch full press briefing below:

Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post. Like us at Facebook, follow us at Twitter and Steemit. This article is Creative Commons and can be republished in full with attribution.

Source Article from

If Criminal Psychopaths Run The Government, Why Give Them More Power?

By James Corbett

We all know that the criminal psychopaths who populate the government will stop at nothing to achieve their sadistic ends. But you’ve gotta vote for someone, right? So why not vote for the criminal psychopath that promises you free healthcare? Or maybe the criminal psychopath that promises to keep you safe from the big, bad turban-wearing (Gladio-sponsored) boogeymen? Anyway, I’m sure it’ll all work out…

Visit,  subscribe on YouTube, follow on Steemit.

Source Article from

What Parents Should Know About EMFs and Wi-Fi

By Catherine J. Frompovich

EMFs (electromagnetic frequencies) and RFs (radio frequencies) contribute to Electrosmog; both frequencies affect and compromise the human organism, especially children’s.

I’ve been a consumer health researcher since the late 1970s.  I was one of the few healthcare professionals to learn and to be concerned about vaccine adverse events in the 1980s, since either doctors I knew or those I worked with began hearing Moms’ heart-wrenching stories of how their infants were damaged by vaccines and had not been the same since.  As a result of that exposure on a very definitive timeline, I’ve been following the research, activism, corporatism, and politics of vaccines ever since.  My 2013 book was Vaccination Voodoo What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines is available on

However, for how harmful vaccines are for virtually castrating the immature immune system of an infant and/or toddler, there is something equally as harmful, if maybe not worse, which just about everyone thinks is perfectly safe.  What I’m talking about is microwave technology wavelengths that enable all the smart phones, Apps and other high tech devices and games most people “buy into and love,” plus accept as “safe.”  Nothing can be further from the authentic scientific facts.

There are several particulars I think you ought to know.  The information is imperative to understanding health problems and issues, which, unfortunately, can stem from and/or be caused by constant EMF exposures, especially at low levels.

1 – All smart and/or microwave tech gadgets ‘safety’ parameters are based on World War II science and thermal effects. None consider non-thermal radiation wave length adverse health effects.

2 – Any electronic device that can send and/or receive voice, data, graphics, etc. emits RFs. Cell phones, iPhones, Wi-Fi, routers, baby monitors, are significant devices emitting RFs.  Those devices operate in the 2-3-4 GHz (gigahertz) range, which are more problematic or harmful especially to children.

3 – Why are children more vulnerable to EMFs/RFs? Kids’ bodies and organs are still developing; the brain until around 22 years of age.  All human bodies contain between 60 to 70% water with the brain and heart containing higher percentages, i.e., 73% and the lungs contain about 83%.  Therefore, children’s smaller, less developed bodies and tissues are more vulnerable to RF exposure, especially from Wi-Fi in school and at home.  Microwaves vibrate water.

Water and microwaves. Water molecules contain three atoms and so can vibrate in a number of different ways. … When microwaves pass through water the water molecules absorb some of the microwave energy and as a result they twist and turn, writhing around, as the radiation passes by. Source

Think of Wi-Fi using this analogy: Wi-Fi is like leaving your microwave oven on, operating at high power with the oven door left open.  Now think one such analogy and device for every room in your house, if your house is not hard-wired for safe Wi-Fi, but you use routers.

4 – Keep all high tech, smart appliances away from the use by children, especially cell phones for those who are young. Source

5 – No cell phones, TV, computers, electronic games in a child’s bedroom. Never allow anyone to sleep with a cell phone on the bed, clasped in their hand or under a pillow.  Fried brains, anyone?

6 – At night, turn off circuit breakers to bedrooms, if need be, to get away from AMI Smart Meters sending EMFs with dirty electricity or sinusoidal harmonics pulsing over copper wiring inside your bedroom walls, thousand times faster than the 60Hz wiring is built to carry.  Those sinusoidal waves radiate out 6 to 8 feet and have been documented as interfering with the brain’s production of melatonin, which occurs during sleep at night when the body is in the recuperative/repair stage of its 24 hour circadian rhythm cycle.

7 – The Schumann Resonance is the hertz frequency at which the human body resonates or vibrates electromagnetically, which is 7.83Hz. Humans basically are electromagnetic beings.  That is confirmed by medical tests that measure brain, heart and muscle activity.  However, EMFs/RFs coming off microwave technology appliances are in the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands times faster ranges, therefore, contributing constant stresses to all bodily functions, especially the brain and central nervous system.

8 – EMFs/RFs affect children on the Autism Spectrum leading to higher anxieties, plus more confusion. Therefore, exposure should be eliminated from all sources and appliances. Source

9 – High tech reliance is a newly-acquired human addiction, which has psychologists worried about the younger generations and how they are being affected negatively, socially and emotionally.

10 – Study a comprehensive chart of the Electromagnetic Spectrum to understand how various smart appliances are rated. Cell phones frequency ranges are from 3KHz to 300 GHz.  Because of such extreme overuse and addictions to iPhones, smart phones and cell phones, tech providers now want to install 5G microwave antennas right outside your front porch on a pole.  5G has not been tested for safety, as far as I know, and it can be assumed the U.S. Federal Communications Commission automatically will approve it as ‘safe’ as they have approved all other frequencies based upon the erroneous ICNIRP (Internal Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) principle that there are no EMF/RF wavelengths as non-thermal radiation waves, just thermal or heat effects, which comes from World War II radar research days.   It’s 2017; how far behind the scientific times does the microwave industry have to stay to hoodwink everyone, like the tobacco industry did until the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health.

11 – In April of 2017, an Italian court ruled a work-related use of a mobile phone caused an executive to develop a benign brain tumor. Slowly awareness is coming into the high tech microwave world of legal law suits.  However, microwave industry associations’ science is flawed and their products and services are compromising to human health.

12 – There’s a terrific cartoon-like infomercial on the Internet about how utility companies Smart Meters will collect and sell your personal use data and information to unknown third parties for marketing purposes without your knowledge and/or consent. High tech created the algorithm “Onzo,” which tracks your every appliance usage.  Google O-N-Z-O smart meter algorithm and watch what you don’t know come to reality.

13 – One Hertz (Hz) equals one cycle per second. One kilohertz (KHz) is equivalent to one thousand cycles per second. One megahertz (MHz) equals one million cycles per second.  A Gigahertz (GHz) is a frequency equal to one billion hertz or cycles per second.

Microwaves are a specific category of radio waves that loosely can be defined as radiofrequency energy at frequencies ranging from 1 GHz to 30 GHz.

14 – When an individual’s body biology and biochemistry have been assaulted and saturated for too long by EMFs/RFs and they no longer can tolerate living in the sea of electrosmog from EMFs/RFs, they become electromagnetically hypersensitive (EHS) or idiopathic environment intolerant (IEI), as some medical doctors diagnose the syndrome, which has become more prevalent due to all the smart tech appliances and AMI Smart Meters. 26% of USA citizens are EHS; 19% of Swedish; 27% of Danish and 32% of German citizens are EHS.

15 – The American Academy of Environmental Medicine publishes online its “Recommendations Regarding Electromagnetic And Radiofrequency Exposure,” which I heartily suggest everyone studies and prints out to save.

16 – The FCC safety guidelines say you should not be subjected to a field of 600 microwatts per centimeter squared for more than 30 minutes! A microwatt is equal to one-millionth of a watt.  However, no one has factored in the cumulative total number of microwatts from all EMF/RF sources, so that the FCC safety guideline basically is way off the mark, I say.   Those figures are based on outdated science.  Updated safety guidelines have to be recalculated for 24/7/365 exposures for how humans use microwave tech gadgets:

a. wearing a live cell phone on your person;

b. exposure to Wi-Fi for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week in a school classroom or at your place of employment;

c. AMI Smart Meters pulses and non-thermal exposures coming over inside-house-wall-wires from sinusoidal harmonics thousands times faster than the 60Hz wiring is built to withstand and deliver. Isn’t that both fire and health hazards?

17 – Lastly, Lloyd’s of London and Swiss Re, two major insurance companies of the world, will not cover medical expenses incurred due to electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation (EMR), i.e., cell phones, Wi-Fi, cell towers, antennas, DAS network coverage, Internet of Things (IoT), devices, smart meters, etc. What does that tell you?

18 – The country of Russia apparently has denied 5G rollout and is planning on using fiber optic cables to deliver Internet to everyone—the safest way possible, but not in the USA or with the FCC!

Now I’d like to share information I consider important to know and was generated by independent AMI Smart Meter researchers in California.  The findings are based upon what they found investigating an Itron AMI Smart Meter output measurements: RF/EMF readings drop from 8,000 to 15,000 microwatts per square meter at 2 to 3 feet away from the meter, and down to 300 microwatts per square meter, or less, at ten feet away.  That information indicates the importance of putting distance between you and an AMI Smart Meter and the use of shielding, if you cannot keep an analog meter.

An analog meter is one that has 5 clock-like dials and a disk that spins.  There is an AMR Meter electric companies started installing in the 1980s which reads your usage and sends it to the utility to provide a billing, and no meter reader comes around to read your meter.  The Automatic Meter Reader (remote meter reading) meter looks very similar to an AMI Smart Meter—both are digital in design.  The AMR can send information only one way and does not send dirty electricity pulses onto your house wires every 15 seconds or so looking for appliances to hook up with, monitor, surveil and report back to whomever.

Proper and correct shielding methods can be taken, but you have to do your research to see what will work for you and your family.

According to the California researchers’ work I’ve accessed, they report a reading below 10 microwatts per meter squared to be safe except for the most electromagnetically-sensitive individuals, a category which many ASD children unfortunately fall into.  From my research, I say having no AMI Smart Meter exposure is the safest of all.

Furthermore, those researchers state the most important achievement for shielding against EMFs/RFs is not to have microbursts of radio waves with a few hundred microwatts per meter squared pulsing into your sleeping areas day and night every ten to fifteen seconds, which AMI Smart Meters pulse.

Please remember you never want to sleep with the head of your bed against the wall near or against the electric AMI Smart Meter wall because of the inevitable magnetic field exposure all AMI Smart Meters emit within four feet in all directions.

People living in apartment complexes or condominiums need to check out where the AMI Smart Meter ‘banks’ are located, usually dozens of meters on one wall area, exponentially increasing the EMF/RF outputs.  Stay away from them!

Here are some quick references to make note of:

A. The Smart Meter Guard is a fine wire mesh that encircles the smart meter on sides and front that is grounded to the metal box upon which the smart meter is mounted.

B. Less EMF is an EMF shielding business whose phone number is 888-537-7363. They can provide information how to shield your indoor living and work space from a smart meter.

C. Safe Living Technologies is a retailer of shielding fabrics to protect against sources of RF. The company is run by an engineer and building biologist, Rob Metzinger.  Their phone number is 519-240-8735.

D. Use plug-in shut off switches, available online or at some local hardware stores.

E. If you turn off the electric breakers to your bedrooms, make certain you have battery-operated smoke detectors installed in each bedroom.

F. Shielding also can be achieved by using Finemet and Cobaltex fabric from Less EMF (see B above) to create a safe room, such as a bedroom or sleeping area. That may be particularly helpful in apartment buildings where high frequency transient voltage comes from circuits in walls.

G. If you can, it is best to invest in what’s called an electrosmog meter, a device which gives readings in your home for appliances and AMI Smart Meters.

H. Here are the names of the top ten names of vendors to the “Smart Grid”:

  • ABB
  • eMeter
  • IBM
  • Itron
  • Landis+Gyer
  • SEL
  • Siemens
  • SilverSpring Networks


The very large AMI Smart Meters manufacturers include:

  • Itron, the largest manufacturer of smart meters in the world
  • Elster Group
  • General Electric
  • Landis + Gyr (Swiss based firm)
  • Schieder Electric  Source

The most common symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity, per Richard Mankiewicz, are:

  • A warm or burning sensation in the face somewhat like feeling sunburnt.
  • A tingling or prickling sensation across the face or other parts of the body
  • Extreme dryness of mucous membranes such as the back of the throat and eyes
  • A swelling of the mucous membranes such as nose, throat, ears and sinuses without any infectious cause
  • Problems with concentration, loss of memory and dizziness
  • A feeling of impending influenza (flu) that somehow never quite breaks out
  • Headaches and nausea
  • Teeth and jaw pains
  • Aches and pains in muscles and joints
  • Cardiac palpitations  [If these do occur, it’s time to get real medical help from a healthcare practitioner who is familiar with and will factor in the possibility of EHS.]  Source

Here’s a suggestion to consider: Have a qualified electrician install a circuit breaking wall switch for each bedroom of your home so that at night while you sleep, the hot wires to your outlets that surround your room are shut off.   This way you’re not sleeping within what is known as a dirty electrical circuit field that fluctuates above 60 cycles.  That type of spike disturbance keeps human life and frequency patterns off kilter. Source

Causes Of Dirty Electricity

Here are some of the common sources of dirty electricity:

  • Light dimmer switches
  • Computers and laptops that plug in
  • Printers and scanners
  • Fluorescent lights and tubes (CFLs)
  • Solar power installations
  • Televisions
  • Music Entertainment Systems
  • Video game consoles
  • Cordless phones
  • Microwave Ovens
  • Smart meters and smart appliances
  • Wi-Fi routers and modems
  • Battery chargers for cell phones, etc.
  • Blenders and mixers
  • Hair Dryers
  • Multi-Speed Fans

Dirty electricity can be measured by using a GS or STETZERiZER® Microsurge Meter.

Using a Microsurge meter and installing a collection of STETZERiZER® Filters is a means by which your electricity can be rendered ‘safer’.

I’d like to leave you with this information, which was emailed to me by a registered radiologic technologist: “why are these companies allowed to affix radiation emitting devices to our homes, which expose peeps 24/7 with non-ionizing radiation, which btw…is probably way more damaging because of the radiation being on the “low level side” on the radiation spectrum  …..these add way up and above, highly, regulated, radiation! exposures……”

Unfortunately, that’s what we have to deal with because of our addictions to microwave-run technologies and gadgets, plus an apparent regulatory disregard for non-thermal radiation science documenting numerous health harms.

Image Credit

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Source Article from

New Hampshire Law Now Allows Local Common Core Opt Out

By Michael Maharrey

On Tuesday, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu signed a bill into law that prohibits the state department of education and the state board of education from requiring any school or school district to implement Common Core standards. This represents an opportunity for local communities to opt out of Common Core and nullify the program in practice.

A coalition of Republicans introduced Senate Bill 44 (SB44) in January. The legislation opens the door to to end common core in the state by prohibiting the department of education and the board of education from requiring schools to implement Common Core standards.

Neither the department of education nor the state board of education shall by statute or rule require that the common core state standards developed jointly by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers be implemented in any school or school district in this state.

In addition, SB44 prohibits the state board of education from amending existing academic standards, or approving new standards, without prior review and recommendation of an education legislative oversight committee.

The House passed SB44 by a voice vote. The Senate passed it with a 14-9 vote. Sununu signed it into law on Tuesday.

This is a first step toward unraveling Common Core in New Hampshire. While it will not immediately end the program, or require school districts to abandon it, it would allow for local decision making. School districts that want to abandon the national standards would be free to do so.


Common Core was intended to create nationwide education standards. While touted as a state initiative through the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), the U.S. Department of Education was heavily involved behind the scenes. Up until recently, the DoE tied the grant of waivers from the No Child Left Behind Act to adoption of Common Core, using the standards as powerful strings to influence state educational policy. The Every Student Succeeds Act passed by Congress in 2015 now prohibits the DoE from attempting to “influence, incentivize, or coerce State adoption of the Common Core State Standards … or any other academic standards common to a significant number of States.” But under the new federal law, states still must comply with College and Career Ready Standards, based on Common Core, as a condition for receiving some federal dollars. It also requires the federal education secretary to approve each state’s plans for standards and assessments.

Even with the federal strings partially cut from Common Core for the time being, it is still imperative for each state to adopt its own standards. The feds can once again use these national standards to meddle in state education at any time if they remain in place. Just as importantly, one-size-fits-all standard simply don’t benefit children. State and local governments should remain in full control of their own educational systems.

Rejecting nationalized education standards is the first step toward bringing true academic choice, and freedom. Passage of this legislation into law represents a positive step forward for the people of New Hampshire and a path for other states to follow.


SB44 will go into effect on Sept 16, 2017

Source Article from

Will 5G Be Cost Effective For The Cell Industry?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Have consumers ever thought what faster 5G cell service actually could wind up doing and/or costing?

There’s a lot of talk about 5G being the next generation of cell provider service, but analysts at UBS think 5G may be too expensive!

Too expensive!  Yes, too expensive is what UBS put forth in a note to investors.  UBS analyst Richard Dineen claims:

We modelled how many 5G sites would be required to cover the NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), an area of ~8,300sq/mi with >20m population (6% of US total). Using FCC tower data, terrain, street and vertical elevation models, our analysis suggests over 600,000 5G cells (each at 100m radius) would be required for contiguous 5G coverage – more than a 500-fold increase from today’s 3G/4G cell footprint. Clearly this would not make economic sense for operators, adding conviction to our view that 5G at mmW frequencies could only be deployed as a WiFi-like “hotzone” service in densely-populated, wealthy areas. [1]

The above model says more than most folks may realize what will need to be implemented in order to have faster Wi-Fi, etc.  It would require an investment in building 500 times more cell towers than now exist to transmit 3G/4G technology.  And current towers dot the landscape like mushrooms after a spring rain.

Can you imagine the cost(s) to construct 600,000 new cell towers with each having only a 100 m (meter or 300 foot) radius, when the average cell tower cost is between $200,000 and $250,000?  And those 600,000 towers would take care of providing 5G cell services to only New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania!  What about the rest of the country?  Frankly, one has to question how much that type of service would cost subscribers monthly.  Could only the rich afford 5G service?

Now here’s what seems to be a ‘prickly burr’ in the 5G scenario, in my opinion.

The technology uses millimeter waves that simply don’t travel far enough, and are too easily disrupted, to make sense for a large-scale cell phone network.

The 5G technology does work. It promises speeds that are much faster than the current 4G systems allow, but only if you can get that signal to reach between a cell tower and a phone. [1] [CJF emphasis]

Will a solution to the above ‘problem’ be to place 5G ‘thimble’ cell towers on everyone’s front porch or on a special pole planted outside front doors?

However, I think the cell/microwave industry may be biting off more than they can chew and swallow, i.e., can 5G make them go broke?  Isn’t that something for them to think about, especially if only the rich can afford 5G?



Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Source Article from

Episode #195 – SUNDAY WIRE: ‘Chickenhawk Nation’ with Patrick Henningsen, Mike Robinson

Episode #195 of SUNDAY WIRE SHOW resumes on July 23rd, 2017 as guest host Patrick Henningsen brings you this week’s LIVE broadcast on the Alternate Current Radio Network – covering all the top news stories both at home and internationally…


5pm-8pm UK Time | 12pm-3pm ET (US) | 9am-12am PT (US)

1-SUPPORT-21WIRE-ClickThis week we deliver another LIVE broadcast from the UK, as SUNDAY WIRE host Patrick Henningsen is joined by Mike Robinson, editor of the UK Column, as we discuss this past weekend’s event at the Grenfell Tower in West London, and hear some testimonies from effected residents. Later in the second our we’ll discuss the collapse of the US Mainstream Media including the recent case of Kurt Eichenwald and Newsweek magazine who were defeated by a Sputnik News staff writer in a recent legal challenge, John McCain’s recent diagnosis, as well as the recent CIA announcement that they are finally halting (or so they claim) their failed ‘train and equip’ covert program in Syria used to traffic weapons into the hand of terrorists in Syria, and much, much more…

VOTE IN OUR NEWS POLL: Who ‘Meddled’ More in the 2016 Election – The Democratic National Committee (DNC) or Russia?


Strap yourselves in and lower the blast shield – this is your brave new world…


Download Episode #194

Sunday Wire Radio Show Archives

iTunes Libsyn Spreaker Stitcher Stitcher

Source Article from

Progressives Outraged Over Beyonce “So White” Wax Figure at Madame Tussauds

American liberal activists still struggling with the concept that a wax figure is not meant to be real.

21st Century Wire says…

The progressive culture police are on the march again – this time to Madame Tussauds Wax Museum in New York City. The recent unveiling of the new Beyoncé wax statue sent activists into a frenzy when it was claimed that the celebrity pop singer was “too white.”

America’s unofficial cultural Stasi slammed the museum for purportedly “whitewashing” the singers skin tone.

The liberal outcry on social media prompted the museum to withdraw the statue temporarily to avoid any further uproar, confirming that it will be “off the floor until further notice.”

However, Madame Tussauds issued a statement reassuring liberal activists that nothing untoward had happened and that they only needed to readjust the lighting of their new exhibition:

“We love, respect and enjoy a working relationship with Beyoncé… We have adjusted the styling and the lighting of her figure and she is on display at  New York.”

In an interview with Entertainment Tonight museum spokesperson added, “Our talented team of sculptors take every effort to ensure we accurately color match all of our wax figures to the celebrity being depicted.”

“Lighting within the attraction combined with flash photography may distort and misrepresent the color of our wax figures, which is something our sculptors are unable to account for at the production stage.”

And now – for other more important news…

READ MORE HOLLYWOOD NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Hollywood Files


Source Article from

Legal Fears Push Newsweek to Delete Eichenwald’s Articles Used to Smear Sputnik News

21st Century Wire says…

Failing US magazine Newsweek once again finds itself on the ropes.

For the last year, US mainstream media outlets have given themselves license to freely spray any and all slanderous accusations regarding Russia into the public domain, and about Russian-based media outlets in particular. One of the primary motivations for this festival of defamation is of course political. Early on in the general election the ‘Russian conspiracy’ theory was promulgated by the White House and the Clinton campaign and the mainstream media in order to damage Trump’s credibility. After Clinton’s epic loss, legions of Democratic Party affiliated journalists and Hillary Clinton supporters in the media are still angry and upset about their election loss and do not accept Donald Trump as their President. As a result, many journalist are still using their positions in media to act out in public, and mostly with the full backing of their like-minded editors and media executives.

While most of the endless scapegoating and lies about Russia and Trump continue as annoying background noise, some of the US liberal establishment’s fake news and libelous claims, like stories made-up by CNN – are beginning to be challenged in the courts – which is causing a panic in many mainstream editorial news desks across America.

This latest challenge to Newsweek and its shamed staff writer Kurt Eichenwald follows on the current ‘blow-back’ trend line…

RT International

Sputnik and RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan commented on the removal by Newsweek of false stories about Trump “conspiring with Russia,” saying it “deleted the lies about us, fearing court proceedings.”

“We’ll continue explaining to variousnewsweeksthat lying is bad,” Simonyan told Sputnik.

Her comments come after Newsweek was forced to take down two erroneous articles by journalist Kurt Eichenwald, claiming that US President Donald Trump had conspired with Russia, as well as smearing former Sputnik editor William Moran.

On Friday, Moran said that a settlement had been reached, but did not provide any further details, saying that the deal was confidential between the two sides.

In October, Moran mistakenly attributed an article by Eichenwald to Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal and, realizing his mistake, deleted the article 20 minutes later. However, while the piece was online, Eichenwald saw it and imagined collusion between the Trump campaign, Sputnik, and Wikileaks.

At the time, numerous media outlets (some usually quite critical of Russia) spoke out against Eichenwald. The Washington Post said that Eichenwald “is at best misleading,” while BuzzFeed proved that Trump and Moran quoted the same erroneous tweet, which was widespread online.

Moran then contacted Eichenwald, attempting to clarify the situation and expecting Eichenwald to retract the story.

That, however, did not happen. Instead, Eichenwald asked him to stay silent in exchange for a job as political reporter with The New Republic, and warned him about the potential consequences if the young journalist refused.
Moran turned down the offer and went public with his version of events.

Moran has left the field of journalism and is currently pursuing a law degree, Sputnik news agency said.

“Newsweek is an established brand of 80 years and yet it is not even in Sputnik’s league in terms of global web traffic and performance,” Patrick Henningsen, geopolitical analyst and executive editor at, said. News outlets like RT and Sputnik are winning in the ratings battle with many US and UK English language media platforms, he said, and explained why this is happening.

“It is simply because the Russia-based English language outlets are filling a demand for real international news and edgy opinion. They are simply feeding a massive audience out there which has been intentionally neglected for decades by Western establishment media conglomerates who have always enjoyed a monopoly on the global English language market. A network like RT, and a website like Sputnik, are only filling a demand which was always there.”



Source Article from

The Birth of a Nation: Thoughts on Turkey’s Recent Anniversary Celebrations

Dr Can Erimtan
21st Century Wire

During last year’s coup attempt Tayyip Erdoğan (or the Prez) narrowly escaped an attempt on his life . . . in the year that has now passed, his Justice and Development Party (or AKP) has been at pains to portray its leader as a hero able to defeat his enemy by means of calling upon the Turkish nation.

Last Saturday was the first anniversary of Turkey’s Coup-that-was-no-Coup, and the Prez and his henchmen made good use of this opportunity to solidify the quasi-mythological narrative they have been constructing ever since. The commemorative festivities already started on July, 11th:

“Turkey has started marking the first anniversary of the failed coup attempt that took place last July. The July 15 Democracy and National Unity Day events will be held under the auspices of the Presidency and last until Sunday evening [15 July 2017],” as related by the official Anadolu Ajansı.

In Ankara, the Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu opened an exhibition entitled ‘The Treacherous 15 July Coup Attempt in Pictures,’ also visiting the graves of the ‘martyrs’ killed that night in Ankara’s Gölbaşı district. Turkey’s EU Minister Ömer Çelik, for his part, visited the graves of two police officers killed in the Gölbaşı district, grave sites located in the southern province of Adana, the ‘martyrs’ home province. Other AKP ministers visited other locations, ensuring that the population-at-large throughout the country be convinced of the AKP government’s deep love for the whole of Turkey – Environment and Urbanization Minister Mehmet Özhaseki going to Central-Anatolian Kayseri, Culture Minister Nabi Avcı visiting West-Anatolian Eskişehir. The Anadolu Ajansı also underlines the religious and pseudo-Ottoman dimensions of the commemoration: in the Central-Anatolian city of Bursa, the first Ottoman capital, morning prayers were recited at the Ulu Camii (or Grand Mosque of Bursa, commissioned between the years 1396-99 by Yıldırım Bayezid [1389-1402], the first Ottoman ruler to officially call himself Sultan by Caliphal decree), followed by Quranic recitations and invocations. During the whole day, on the 15th of July, numerous festivities and commemorations took place all across the nation, events at which banners and posters proclaiming “15 July” to be a veritable “saga” or “epic poem” (in Turkish, destan) were displayed. The epic deeds described in the quasi-mythological accounts took place in reponse to Tayyip Erdoğan’s televised FaceTime call to arms; when the population responded in droves imbued by a religious fervour and dedication quite unknown in Turkish Republican history.

As a result, AKP supporters have since termed the popular reaction the “people’s re-awakening,“ as if the whole of the Turkish nation had been raised from the dead (in Turkish, halkın dirilişi) and have been advocating the phrase throughout the nation so that it has now been universally adopted.

The anniversary constituted the perfect opportunity to stage an all-out propaganda assault, with the figure of the Prez himself supposedly penning an op-ed for the Guardian, published on “Saturday 15 July 2017 02.00 EDT,” as a clear attempt to sway global public opinion. Tayyip Erdoğan, or whomever he was able to call upon to write this piece, declared quite coolly that:

“[t]oday marks the first anniversary of the 15 July coup attempt in Turkey. Exactly one year ago, millions of Turkish citizens set aside their political, cultural and ethnic differences to form a united front against the plotters who tried to suspend our country’s constitution, shot at innocent civilians and bombed the parliament. Together, the people of Turkey refused to allow an armed group to rob them of democracy, liberty and their way of life. In thwarting this assault, 250 people lost their lives and another 2,193 were injured. My government’s continuing efforts to bring to justice Fethullah Gülen and his followers – who, evidence suggests, were behind the failed coup – isn’t just important for Turkey but for democracy everywhere.”

But, in reality, the purge of individuals associated with the figure of Gülen (image, left) following the coup was but the continuation and widening of a persecution that had been going strong since late 2013. These purges had come in response to a “corruption probe which implicated several government ministers and Erdoğan’s son,”  a scandal that erupted on 17/25 December 2013 and that is commonly referred to as #AKPgate. In response, “the AKP government moved swiftly to purge thousands of police officers, civil servants, prosecutors and judges without trial or disciplinary procedure, a self-confessed ‘witch-hunt,’ on the pretext of Hizmet [or Gülen] affiliation,” as expressed in report compiled by the Brussels-based Dialogue Platform, an admittedly Gülenist non-profit association. One could argue that last year’s coup attempt provided AKP-led Ankara with a perfect pretext to finish these purges. The AKP machinery is now trying to use the international platform that is The Guardian to distort reality further and convince the world that the “alternative facts,“ presented on the website of the broadsheet universally touted as left-leaning and pro-human rights-oriented yet equally beholden to the imperial agenda benefitting the U.S. and NATO, could now become embedded in global public opinion’s consciousness:

“[t]he fact that efforts by Turkey to identify and dismiss public officials loyal to Gülen – a US-based Turkish national – came under fire from the same groups raised questions regarding the west’s commitment to my country’s democracy and security. To add insult to injury, dozens of senior leaders of FETÖ, the organisation led by Gülen, have been granted asylum by our country’s self-proclaimed friends and allies. There is no way to sugar-coat this betrayal of Turkey’s friendship – which is incompatible with bilateral relations and fundamental values alike. Today, western leaders have a choice between standing in solidarity with terrorists or regaining the favour of the Turkish people,” the apparently Prez-penned piece continues.

In language somewhat reminiscent of George W. Bush’s post-9/11 words, the Prez and the AKP machinery seek to construct a ‘underdog narrative’ in an attempt to create sympathy and support for their project for a New Turkey: “[e]very nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists,“ Bush, Jr. said on 21 September 2001.

Ever since the party’s inception in 2001, Tayyip Erdoğan and his AKP machinery have been striving to change Atatürk’s nation-state and transform Turkey into a Muslim nation beholden to the Prophet’s example (the Sunnah) and the rules and precepts laid down in the Holy Book (Quran). Many critics have argued that Erdoğan’s long-term yet somewhat hidden goal had always been to establish an Islamic state in Anatolia, with a population composed of Sunni Muslims of different ethnic backgrounds and/or allegiances, as I also explained at length in December 2013. In contrast, Erdoğan himself declared in 2005 that “[w]e are not an Islamic party, and we also refuse labels such as Muslim-democrat.” And on 29 July 2008, Turkey’s Constitutional Court “stopped just one vote short of the necessary consensus that would have seen the Justice and Development party (AKP) closed and its leading figures banned from politics” on account of alleged anti-secular tendencies and behaviour – counter to “the principles of the democratic and secular republic” (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, Article 68, 4th Paragraph). A little more than a year later, the Prez-then-PM Tayyip Erdoğan told an audience at the Johns Hopkins University that “[o]ur party is by no means an Islamist party,“ adding that “there is no Neo-Ottoman tendency present in the Republic of Turkey.“ (“Turkey in the 21st Century: Building Peace Through Diplomacy,” 7 December 2009). But, the developments in Turkey over the past 5 to 7 years have clearly proven otherwise, I would argue.

Last year, Tayyip Erdoğan’s by now more than legendary televised FaceTime call to arms was in reality an open invitation to martyrdom – the Prez urged his followers comprised of male and female Turkish citizens to lay their lives on the line and, as we have seen, untold Turks responded enthusiastically with “250 people” actually dying in the process. These individuals are now hailed as martyrs and these words are more than just florid language. The issue of martyrdom is a potent subject in Islam, one but has to think of the many jihadi terrorists sacrificing their lives in suicide attacks. The Islamic scholar Abul-Fazl Ezzati posits that:

“concepts of martyrdom and Holy Struggle in the cause of Allah [otherwise known as jihad] are interrelated. Both words have been frequently used in the Holy Qur’an. In fact, there is no martyrdom without struggle in the cause of Allah and for the cause of the truth [or Al-Haqq, one of the godhead’s 99 beautiful names].”

Traditionally (meaning in Kemalist terms), in Turkey, the concept of martyrdom had been divorced of its religious context and meaning, becoming an honorific bestowed upon soldiers perishing in terror attacks during their pursuit of duty defending the fatherland, which had become a higher goal in its own right. But the AKP government made sure to bring an end to such semantic confusion. During a meeting of the AKP faction in Turkey’s Parliament (or TBMM) on Wednesday, 21 March 2012, the then still-PM Erdoğan made the following announcement:

“[w]e are including civilians who died in terror events into the category of martyrs. Civilians who become invalid of die by reason of a terror event and their relatives will receive compensation and a monthly allowance.”

Following the failed coup, the AKP authorities were quick to term the coup-plotters terrorists belonging to a “shadowy, clearly elusive, and possibly even non-existent, organization” known only as the supposed terror group FETÖ (Fettullahçı Terör Örgütü or Fethullahist Terror Organization) – a terror group that seems to be nothing but the outcome of the Ankara judiciary’s inventive and creative phraseology (7 May 2015).

As a result, the FaceTime ‘call to arms’ was nothing but an open invitation to become a mujahid (or one who struggles in the cause of Allah, or its representatives on earth, or practising jihad, if you will) and possibly even a martyr (or shahid, spelt as şehit, in Turkish). During the anniversary celebrations these martyrs were duly commemorated and honoured in prayers and exhortations. The Turkish journalist and columnist Cengiz Çandar relates that the “zenith of the ceremonies was in Istanbul, which saw an impressive one-man show by Erdogan and also a significant response to the recent 450-kilometer (280-mile) march for justice from Ankara to Istanbul led by [opposition leader Kemal] Kilicdaroglu . . . Tens of thousands filled the highway leading from the Asian side of Istanbul to the Bosporus bridge renamed ‘The July 15 Martyrs Bridge’ and poured toward the European side where Erdogan delivered a venomous speech targeting Kilicdaroglu, as well as other political opponents, while also attacking Fethullah Gulen, the cleric whom Turkish authorities claim was the mastermind of the failed coup.”

In his speech to the gathered masses, the Prez was surprisingly frank and honest: “[o]ur people (or nation) immediately recognised by looking at the methods and style [of action] employed that the gang of traitors [known as] FETÖ stood behind this coup attempt. Our people (or nation) shot into action straightaway when they saw that Turkey stood on the verge of an attack, of an attempted occupation by means of [employing] the gang of traitors [known as] FETÖ . . . The biggest resistance and the bloodiest attacks were experienced in Istanbul and Ankara . . . So, what did the people opposing [tanks and weapons employed by the coup-plotters] hold in their hands? Did my citizens hold weapons in their hands? In their hands, just like today, there was a flag, but next to it there was another, much more effective weapon. That weapon was their faith, their faith.”

At the outset of his speech, the Prez identifies the enemy as a terror group working for nefarious outside forces, outside forces that had been intent on invading and occupying the Turkish homeland, arguably referring to the U.S. and the CIA. Tayyip Erdoğan then presents the Turkish people or the Turkish nation as an entity imbued with an unshakable faith, a true belief in the one god that is Allah and in Muhammad, his Prophet and Messenger. As a result, it seems quite commonsense that over the past year the Prez and his henchmen have been speaking about a Second War of Independence in reference to the popular opposition to the attempted coup.

Kemalist historiography and propaganda has always portrayed the War of Independence (1919-22) as a popular uprising against foreign occupiers led by the charismatic leader of the nationalist movement, Mustafa Kemal Pasha (who was to become Atatürk in 1934). The War of Independence was portrayed as an irredentist movement of the Anatolian population, a mixed population group consisting of many ethnic groups and sub-groups united in geographical and religious terms. Following  Mustafa Kemal’s victory, state-led propaganda efforts and social engineering transformed these disparate Muslim groups into a cohesive nation of Turks. For this reason, Islamist opponents of the Kemalist state have always reasoned that Anatolian Muslims were only able to defeat the foreign occupiers with the “power of their faith“ (in Turkish, iman gücü). Tayyip Erdoğan is now cunninngly employing last year’s failed coup and this year’s commemorations to proclaim himself the founder of a new nation, a new nation of believers living in the newly liberated spiritual territories of the New Turkey. In this context, a telling hashtag has surfaced on social media, namely #DemokrasiDeğilİslamİçin or #NotDemocracyButForIslam. Mustafa Kemal and his nationalist armies succeeded in the physical liberation of the land, and nearly one hundred years later, Tayyip Erdoğan’s volunteer army of mujahids and martyrs-in-waiting has now liberated the Anatolian peninsula in spiritual terms. As a result, the terms citizen and believer have now become synonymous.

The July 15 Democracy and National Unity Day marks the birth of a new nation on the grounds of the Republic of Turkey. The columnist Çandar’s summary of the end of the day’s events nicely illustrates this point:

“[t]he night of July 15 and the early hours of July 16 saw commemoration events transformed into a show of Islamist symbols and of Erdogan himself. The reciting of the Holy Quran from the minarets of 80,000 mosques all over the country was accompanied by collective prayers in the garden of the parliament building in Ankara. Islamic and Islamist symbols marked the ceremonies in Ankara and in Istanbul.”

Last year I put forward that Erdoğan was intent on “turning ’15 July’ into a symbolic date, comparable to ’31 March’ in reverse. The so-called ’31 March Incident’ (or in Turkish, 31 Mart Vakası) refers to the defeat of a 1909 countercoup, a counter coup that would have abolished the constitutional regime introduced the previous year and reinstated Sultan Abdülhamid II as an absolute autocrat ruling the Ottoman lands. At the time, counter-revolutionary army units were joined by hordes of theological students (softa) and turbaned clerics (ulema) shouting, ‘We want Shariah.’ Future history books might very well relate the events of ’15 July’ as a successful counter-revolution that established Tayyip Erdoğan as Turkey’s first absolute president, overseeing Turkey’s successful return to its Islamic roots of yesteryear. “In hindsight, last April’s referendum could be seen as the culmination of such a development. This seemingly democratic ploy has given Erdoğan the opportunity to proclaim his Absolute Presidency, a polity that might very well see the proclamation of Islamic Law in Turkey, as symbolised by the issue of capital punishment which also figured prominently during the last weekend’s celebrations. The referendum allowed the Prez to receive the “reins of power from the people as a ‘gift from God,’ [which enabled] him to replace the figure of Atatürk in the hearts and minds of the Turkish  people.” The D.C.-based Turkey specialist Soner Çağaptay even calls Erdoğan “an anti-Atatürk Atatürk.“

But now, last year’s failed coup attempt has given the Prez the opportunity to greatly expand his ambitions. From merely returning Islam to its rightful place in the land, Tayyip Erdoğan has now secured victory in a second War of Liberation, thereby forging a new nation of believers on the territories of the Republic of Turkey, united as Muslims in spite of their “political, cultural and ethnic differences.”

Like the Ottoman Yıldırım Bayezid who established the Ottoman Sultanate in the 14th century, destined to become the pre-eminent Muslim state in the world, Tayyip Erdoğan has now established the New Turkey, as a state he hopes will dominate the Islamic world as the heir to its Ottoman forebear that once united the Sunni Islamic world in one polity.

Dr. Can Erimtan is an independent scholar who was living in Istanbul for some time, with a wide interest in the politics, history and culture of the Balkans and the Greater Middle East. He attended the VUB in Brussels and did his graduate work at the universities of Essex and Oxford. In Oxford, Erimtan was a member of Lady Margaret Hall and he obtained his doctorate in Modern History in 2002. His publications include the book “Ottomans Looking West?” as well as numerous scholarly articles. In the period 2010-11, he wrote op-eds for Today’s Zaman and in the further course of 2011 he also published a number of pieces in Hürriyet Daily News. In 2013, he was the Turkey Editor of the İstanbul Gazette. He is on Twitter at @theerimtanangle

READ MORE TURKEY NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Turkey Files


Source Article from

The Esoteric Meaning of The Fountain (2006) – Jay Dyer

Jay Dyer
21st Century Wire

The Fountain is one of Hollywood’s more difficult esoteric films: The failure of the film to achieve at the box office can be chalked up to this heavily mystifying plot and symbolism.

To decode the film requires some familiarity wth cabalism, alchemy, Mayan mythology, Genesis and creation and Zen philosophy. Combining all these motifs in a menagerie of metaphysical midrash, as with most Darren Aronofsky films like Noah or Black Swan, the key is found in the speculation of the cabala.

The film opens with Genesis 3:24, that man was banished from Eden by a Cherub with a flaming sword, sending the fallen couple East of Eden. As a result, death and corruption entered, not just the human race, but the entire created order became subject to corruption, decay and death (Romans 8). In our film, the narrative takes place in three time periods, each some 500 years apart, with the oldest being Hugh Jackman as Tomas Verde, a Conquistador in love with Queen Isobella of Spain (Rachel Weisz), imprisoned within her own palace at the behest of a Spanish Inquisition in league with Rome and hell-bent on seizing power from the cabalistically-influenced Queen.

Isobella is regaled in tree-like dress, encased in her throne room behind a tree-like fence, hinting ahead of time she is mystically linked to the Tree of Life (understood here in the cabalistic sense as the metaphysical structure of creation). Tomas, commissioned by Isabella and a Franciscan, is told to seek the source of immortality within the Mayan Legends that also foretell the story of the Tree, which Isobella understands must be united with the power of the Tree of Knowledge. These two trees will make up one of the important themes in the film – the unification of logical, analytical and left-brain masculine reasoning with intuitive, emotional, right-brained feminine approaches. This is why modern-day Tom (Jackman) finds himself consumed with a different quest to save the life of Izzy (Weisz) from cancer. As a cutting-edge neuroscientist, Tom is on the verge of curing cancer by synthesizing an extract from a tree in Guatemala – the same tree mystically linked to Izzy and the Tree of Life.

Mayan Tree as the Life-giving Fountain.

Under the veils of Roman Catholicism and Mayan religion, the esoteric philosophy of the film slowly emerges: the ancient Mayan priest’s flaming sword that beheads Tomas is a re-enactment of the ancient Edenic tale of Adam and Eve’s banishments. Now, the secrets to both immortality and life are under the guardianship of a pagan priesthood of death. The religion of human sacrifice and cannibalism, which is likely why the images of hair and flesh appear in reliquaries. In other words, Roman Catholicism is interpreted to be a cover for the perennial philosophy of cabalism, now veiled by the symbols of various religions and cultures. The dark secret, however, is buried within the darkest path of black magic and sorcery, including the “enlightenment” purported to come from the astral realm of “Shibalba,” the Mayan Underworld.

Isobella is the Garden, the  Tree, the Fountain and Sophia.

Tom is also seen 500 or so years in the future traversing the galaxy in an enclosed bubble craft that also contains the tree where Izzy was buried (that mystically links with both Izzy and the Tree of Life) in order to deliver this tree to Shibalba, which we learn is a dying star. The Mayan religion was an astrotheology which linked the stellar heavens with various regions and locales on earth. In fact, the actual entrance to the Mayan Underworld was actually discovered to be the source of a vast system of underwater lakes and streams, called “Shibalba” by the Mayans.  The Guardian explains:

“The director of archaeology for the National Institute of Anthropology and History, Pedro Sanchez Nava, said the theory makes sense in light of other pre-Hispanic peoples such as those who lived at Teotihuacan, near Mexico City, where another water tunnel was found.

“In both cases there was a water current present,” said Sanchez Nava. “There is this allegorical meaning for water … where the cycle of life begins and ends.”  The dig began in 2012, when researchers become concerned about underground anomalies detected with geo-radar under the area in front of the pyramid’s steps.”

The deliverance of the tree to the dying star will presumably bring life to the dying system, as Tom’s synthesizing of the tree extract will save Izzy and as Tomas’ reaching the tree of life atop the Mayan Temple. In each era, Tom’s selfish choice based on attachment and prolonging life results in the cycle starting all over again (presumably). This is why the film consistently shows circular and cyclical imagery, until the climax.

“After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side[a] of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.” -Gen. 3:24

It is only at the end of the age, when Space Tom finally decides to embrace death, recalling the words of Isabella that death is the path to immortality and eternal life. Here, as with the astrotheology and reincarnation, the film links to Platonism (and cabalism), in presenting Tom’s “enlightenment” as flashes of memory of his past lives. Recalling Isobella’s words of acceptance of death, the Tom of each age determines to choose differently, accepting death. As a result, each Tom reaches the Tree, and understands the mystery, eventually transforming into a new, “spiritual” Adam (and Izzy, a new Eve).

The One Ring of Eternal Return and Mystical Union.

Reunion with Izzy, however, can only be achieved in the final stage, when Space Tom can actually travel to the astral Shibalba, and offer both himself and the tree in death, with love overcoming death. Zen ideas are obviously present, such as detachment from life and possessions, while Tom’s full enlightenment is revealed to be apotheosis – by reaching the star gate to the Underworld, Tom becomes “First Father,” and recreates a world in his image from a point of light.

A new world is born, as Tom achieves a mystical marital union as Father with Sophia, his feminine principle. Thus, a Zohar-style cabalistic narrative is the key to decoding the entire film, with an alchemical wedding of masculine and feminine principles, of inner and outer worlds, and reason and intuition, of myth and scientific fact. Mystically, it is the Americas that are the source of the secrets of immortality, which come through scientific gnosis and the eventual overcoming of the limitations of time and space (much like Starchild in 2001: A Space Odyssey).

Beyond the Infinite.

In fact, the choice of Spain was consciously done, as 13th century Spain is the origin of the cabalistic works known as the Zohar, which specifically treat of this gnostic doctrine of divine union, where the male and female archetypes of “god” are fragmented and need to be re-unified. Professor Israel Shahak in his Jewish History, Jewish Religion writes:

“From the First Cause, a first male god called ‘Wisdom’ or ‘Father’ and then a female goddess called ‘Knowledge’ or ‘Mother’ wee emanated or born. From the marriage of these two, a pair of younger gods were born: Son, also called by many other names such as “Small Face,” or the “Holy Blessed One,’ and Daughter, also called ‘Lady,’ ‘Shekinah,’ ‘Queen,’ etc. “

Shahak goes on to explain various secret sexual rites that would go on to influence various occult orders, including the perversions of Crowley and Kenneth Grant in the notion of the Nightside of Eden. For The Fountain, Tom must eventually write the “Divine Words” that complete Izzy’s story which is actually her past life as Queen Isobella. Man becomes the new creator, and Thomas becomes God the Father. Like the Renaissance cabalists and Neoplatonic magicians, all the way back to Egypt, the doctrine of pantheism and reincarnation (aspects of cabala) are found to be the hidden meaning of the pseudo-biblical traditions and teachings. Man’s apotheosis is the Gnostic secret doctrine, and man his own God and Savior. The key to this mystery is revealed to be sexual magic and transhumanism, all of which have their modern origins in medieval cabalistic doctrines of scientism and the transfiguration of “dead matter.”

Tree of Life, Tree of Knosis.

While the Fountain is a fascinating presentation of symbolism and imagery unheard of in most films, the unfortunate doctrine is essentially Luciferian. The enlightenment offered is that of salvation through the scientific attainment of immortality through scientism and occult mythology, combined with the left-handed path association of taking on all possible evils and defilements. As a result of this occult version of dark theosis, one comes to the Abyss of the galaxy (as Tom does) and if successful in crossing and not going mad, one returns divinized. Just as the Serpent promised in the Garden, if man would partake of the Tree of Knowledge, he would attain godhood, apart from God.

Tree of Life of hermeticism and cabala.

Instead this brought death, but in the film, death is presented as merely a stage in occult initiation, indeed as the very embodiment of the alchemical philosopher stone project (hence the golden imagery at the close of the film). Isn’t it odd that the occult realm will posit all manner of esoteric possibilities about Genesis and Eden, God and even the possibility of Man incarnating God through sorcery, but never the actual presentation of Genesis or the Incarnation of God as Man. It’s almost as if there is a plan to mock the biblical message as ridiculous, yet at the same time take a philosophy far more outrageous and inane and prop it up as the highest enlightenment.

READ MORE HOLLYWOOD NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Hollywood Files

Jay Dyer is the author of the best selling title, Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film from Trine Day.  Focusing on film, philosophy, geopolitics and all things esoteric, JaysAnalysisand his podcast, “Esoteric Hollywood,” investigates the deeper meanings between the headlines, exploring the hidden aspects of our sinister synthetic mass media matrix.


Source Article from


3 reasons the United States lost the Middle East by Adam Garrie Jul 22, 2017


Click for Source Article on TheDuran

#1 Chinese economic might = China quietly helped Syria fix the terms on which Chinese companies will invest $2 BILLION in Syria’s economy to rebuild Syria’s largely destroyed infrastructure + China, Russia, and Iran = Substantial supported Syrian military + Both Syria & Iran are on China’s New Silk Road from East Asia to the Middle East. US missed out on cooperating with China on NEW SILK ROAD. China’s One Belt–One Road which runs through much of the region is an economic super-giant in the making.

2. Russian geo-political, military and energy might = Russia gain new Middle Eastern and Eurasian allies and strengthen traditional alliances while not alienating a single power in the region. + Russian involvement in the Syrian war has strengthened an old alliance with Damascus. Syria stated that Russia will be given priority along with China in Iran, in areas of post-war redevelopment with Russia strong in the Energy Sector + Russia is building a partnership with Iraq & strengthening Iran relations + Egypt is warm to Russia and cooperate against terrorist threats and want Libya rebuilt with a decent government. + Russia is cultivating relations with Qatar. = Puts Russia in a unique respected position as a super-power in the wider Middle East as a security partner.

3. Turkey’s realignment and Iran’s re-emergence = Turkey’s relationship with Washington continues to plunge to new depths. Turkey’s participation in the Astana Peace Process along with Russia and Iran is symptomatic of Turkey’s increasingly good relationship with Russia and moreover, of Turkish President Erdogan’s good personal relationship with President Putin. Russia joins Turkey’s strongly pro-Qatari position in the Gulf has put Tehran and Ankara on the same page. + Turkey is looking for new allies like Russia, Iran and Qatar. + Erdogan’s enthusiastic participation in the One Belt–One Road forum in Beijing is a further sign that Ankara is increasingly looking east.






Phone & Alternative link:




Phone & Alternative link:

div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;}


Source Article from

Too Cool For School

Implicit in the banking concept is the assumption of a dichotomy between human beings and the world: a person is merely in the world, not with the world or with others; the individual is spectator, not re-creator.

Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1968)

As a scholar who has spent my professional life reading, writing, and teaching university students, I have come to realize how lucky I was to have been fully funded for my graduate studies and likewise received into departments around the world where my scholarship was welcomed by scholars from countries whose compatriots, when they immigrate to the United States, Canada, and the UK, are often not given a reciprocal reception. More than this, however, I have seen how education is so highly prized by students from these very same backgrounds. Although I have taught middle and upper-class Americans and Canadians for whom education is not something you struggle for, it has been challenging to see how so many white, middle-class students have come to regard education as a right unique to their worldview. Compare this to poor Americans and Canadians and most every immigrant student, and education shifts from being a right to a privilege.

In the early 1990s when I taught at the Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, I was stunned initially when I discovered that the students and I all had to share all the texts in the university library for each of the plays I was covering. The course had approximately 15 students in it and ten different plays to study with the library holding one copy of each play. So we had to time-share the texts throughout the session. My Peruvian students appreciated this course I taught on Avant-Garde theatre so much that I do not remember one complaint from any of them regarding our having to time-share the texts.

And more recently, while working on a child trafficking project in Haiti, I would spend my off day working on ecological projects in Port-au-Prince where I ended up in the Ministry of the Environment where several farmers were waiting to meet the Minister of Environment alongside me and my friend, Rodrigo, as we were there to pitch an ecological workshop plan to the minister. In speaking with these young farmers, we discussed the toxic presence of Monsanto within the Ministry of Agriculture and the methods of collusion between corporations offering free agricultural products and the funneling of money to the Haitian government officials. I related the similarity of what was happening with my work on child trafficking and these young men, both around 24 years of age, were not surprised by the facts, but rather shocked that I knew who in the government was the puppet master. When they realized that I was a university professor, they both said, I want to study with you. There was a certain respect for knowledge that actually involved learning from historical facts, scientific accuracies, and not the ideological spin that people from developing countries identify far more readily than most Canadians and Americans.

At no time in my career have I witnessed education being taken for granted so completely as I have in recent years where critical masses of students from the University of Toronto, New York University, Stanford University, Princeton, Yale, and beyond have turned the classroom from the locus of debate and discussion and into the space of sacred political ideology. Indeed, the classroom in North America and the United Kingdom has become the place where nobody dare question, think, or respond less students and professors alike are made into the objects of pile on culture. And the students who are silenced by these tactics come away with far less direct aggression given that the general model today used against professors is to attack their livelihood and demand that they be fired, to contact their publishers and demand that their words be censored or withdrawn entirely, and in more severe cases, to harass and threaten these individuals and their families.

A product of the student rebellion culture post-1968 which changed the direction of politics on and off campuses around the planet, I grew up knowing that power was always to be questioned and education to be respected. The child of an immigrant father from India, the importance of education was hammered into my head as my father would talk of his own childhood when he would have to read his texts for school with the aid of lamps fueled by mustard seed oil. And he would tell us these stories not as a means of bringing down the learning he engaged in as a small boy, but to show his pride for the time and effort he exerted to read the texts his teachers assigned to him.

Skip to the present day, and many universities in the UK are actually asking professors not to have their students read and write. Instead, using online applications that give the students PowerPoint presentations has become the surrogate for reading and writing. And many professors who do insist on asking students to read and write and refusing to pass undeserving students, are being punished for so doing. I was personally asked at two different UK universities not to have my students write and I was told to not have them read at one university. Is it any surprise that students today are struggling to read entire books? Is it any wonder that the very students who are being so unchallenged by a curriculum which is positing political correctness as the task of the semester (above and beyond the learning of any factual, historical, philosophical, and literary texts) can no longer evoke any coherent critique of why they are joining in protest of the latest SJW-fabricated victim du jour?

And we are already seeing the effects of a generation which is being educated by in-class visuals which are set up to replace reading and where note taking is now comprised of students using their mobile phones and clicking a few pictures of the onscreen lecture. Indeed, students are not being asked to read or to think — they are being asked to become ideological vessels in the very same way that the Brazilian educator and philosopher Paulo Freire warns in his Pedagogy of the Oppressed when he discusses the dangers of education where there is no labour or thinking involved simply because the student is expected to regurgitate everything she has been told. The classroom becomes a quasi-religious space where this parroting of ideas is expected of the young student and the university structure is cast as the space for the young to rebel, to protest, and even to question why they are being asked to read at all, especially if they are engaged in protest.

The larger problem is that university campuses have been turned into political spaces with the assumption that the students who scream the loudest are, in fact, the morally superior and the judicially correct. And as the establishment of safe spaces , privilege checking , and trigger warnings over the years have also been ideologies which have formed part of the current hijacking of education towards political ends, one must wonder about the legitimacy of these mechanisms. For all the banging on about privilege checking some of these students are quite economically privileged despite their screaming at professors about their need for safe spaces. While there is a sizable body of students across these three countries who depend upon student loans and online loans to receive an education, reducing the problems of class inequality, racism, and sexism to privilege ignores the real life core of why these very real structural inequalities exist. In short, attacking every white male professor is not going to change much less address the structural problems.

Just a quick read through some of the incidents that have occurred against scholars who are posing their students serious questions and the backlash is palpable. Just ask Jordan Peterson, Michael Rechtenwald, Bret Weinstein, Rebecca Tuvel, and George Ciccariello-Maher. And one can easily leave the walls of academia and find the likes of Katie Herzog and Natasha Vargas-Cooper who have faced serious retaliation for their writing in recent months. Largely led by students at university campuses, the problem posed by this notion that only one type of thought is acceptable in and out of the classroom, the social justice warrior movement is quickly being revealed as a massive formation of largely privileged students who embolden the historical outrage long associated with the right-wings notions of the sacred. Where rational debate was once the pillar of education and academic exchange, today the concept of breeched safe spaces and hurt feelings have become the hallmark of this era which replaces safety pins as symbolic talisman for critical thinking.

Professors are not the only ones growing tired of the social justice culture of political purity. There are students who are paying a very high price for studying subjects deemed the the SJW politburo as threatening. And in one case in the UK, a university is engaging in intellectual gatekeeping by preventing a Masters student from undertaking a specific line of study for his thesis simply because his topic of choice is unpopular. He is now crowd-funding his legal challenge to Bath Spa University for the right to undertake his Masters research.

And while many writers have long recognized the dangers of the social justice movement, there is now a shift in the tide. In recent months, students at Princeton have been pushing back as have students at the University of Toronto. And what is most troubling to witness is when the students actually have the opportunity to engage with the object of their hatred, such as this video of one such interaction with Jordan Peterson, it is painfully clear that these students do not have the academic dexterity to engage in thoughtful debate. The conversation inevitably turns on straw man, false accusations of violence, and the theatre of anger that fizzles out because it is clear that the many students of color surrounding Jordan Peterson view this SJW movement as endangering their access to education and thoughtful dialogue.

Aside from the acts of violence and verbal aggression reported from Evergreen State College recently, there are now calls for Weinstein to be fired because he was interviewed by Tucker Carlson earlier this year. And Bret Weinsteins recent evocation of the events that have transpired over the past six weeks should be enough for any reasonable student or scholar previously aligned with social justice movement, to step far away and rethink their position.

While most of us would love to live in a world that is socially just , the first step in understanding social justice ought to include the first bit about the social. After all, this term invokes society in general, and not only the select few who scream the loudest or who claim purity within their mantra. We cannot pretend to speak truth to power if we deem massive tracts of our shared society as unworthy of being heard, of forming opinions, or of publishing their thoughts.

If those of us on the left scapegoat critical thinking as bigotry simply because it conflicts with our world view, then we are not really engaging the social whatsoever. While those who take such a position to silence dissent have historically belonged to the religious right, it is not the rule. The left has had and is now fully engaging in its own culture of political censorship. And it is our obligation to challenge some of the vacuous attacks by those on the left who require an allegiance to a pre-conceived social justice orthodoxy. Even if driven by a progressive desire for social and political equality, anti-intellectualism and bullying simply does not make ones political position any more reasoned.

Julian Vigo is a scholar, film-maker and human rights consultant. Her latest book is Earthquake in Haiti: The Pornography of Poverty and the Politics of Development (2015). She can be reached at: [email protected]</ Read other articles by Julian.

Source Article from

The Balfour Declaration: Time to Say Sorry and Time We Made Amends

In a letter to a local newspaper about Brexit and the way prime minister Theresa May is handling it, I happened to mention in passing the Balfour Declaration, criticising her plans to celebrate the centenary “with pride” and invite Israel’s PM Netanyahu to the fun. This drew a sharp response from someone spouting the usual Israeli propaganda ‘facts’ and saying my attitude harmed the Jewish community worldwide.

The Balfour Declaration is a deadly serious subject. It is a cause of great horror and grief, of justifiable international anger, and a matter for profound regret. This is a right time and proper time for debate. Let’s focus on it for the next few months because justice groups are urging the British Government to mark the Balfour Declaration centenary by saying sorry.

Mrs May could do some real good here. She could, at a stroke, help quell the destructive turmoil in the Middle East and begin repair to Britain’s tattered prestige. She could even open new trade routes into Islamic markets, vitally important as we leave the EU.

By eating a little humble pie and apologising on our behalf for 100 years of agony inflicted on lovely people in a lovely part of the world Mrs May could take a giant step for mankind on the world stage. She has between now and November to do it. Will she?

No, she’ll be celebrating Balfour in style with the Israeli prime minister and not giving a toss about the people Britain wronged.

Which is shocking when a UN report recently branded Israel an apartheid regime. It’s even more regrettable considering the desperate cry for help from the National Coalition of Christian Organizations in Palestine in an open letter to the World Council of Churches and the ecumenical movement, signed by over 30 organisations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Here’s an extract:

We are still suffering from 100 years of injustice and oppression that were inflicted on the Palestinian people beginning with the unlawful Balfour declaration… followed by the Israeli occupation of the West Bank including East Jerusalem and Gaza and the fragmentation of our people and our land through policies of isolation and confiscation, and the building of Jewish-only settlements and the Apartheid Wall…

Mrs May needs a jolt.

When I enquired whether the Balfour Declaration is taught in our schools I was told ‘no’. So what exactly is it?

Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary in 1917, penned a letter to the most senior Jew in England, Lord Rothschild pledging the Government’s “best endeavours” to facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a national home for Jewish people. Balfour also wrote:

We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.

It amounted to a betrayal of our Arab allies in WW1. Many in Parliament objected, including Lord Sydenham who remarked:

What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.

At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 when the Great Powers carved up the territorial spoils of war a Zionist delegation produced Balfours promissory note. It planted a powder-keg in the Middle East and the fuse was now lit. Britain accepted the mandate responsibility for Palestine and eventually in 1947 the Great Powers pushed the United Nations into partitioning the territory, again without consulting those who lived there.

So what made Balfour do it? The more you delve, the more incredible the answers to those unaware of the growing influence of worldwide Zionism. Support for the movement and its ambition to create a New Israel was quite fashionable in the corridors of power around the time of WW1. The story I find compelling is that, while Britain struggled desperately against German U-boat successes and ammunition shortages, the Zionist power-brokers of Germany and Eastern Europe consulted with their opposite numbers in America and decided, given their grip on money and media, they could bring the US into the war against Germany and its Ottoman ally if Britain were to promise them Palestine for a Jewish homeland afterwards.

Balfour was a Zionist convert (as were many others including prime minister David Lloyd-George) and in the right position. The proposition was put to Britain in 1916. The Zionists delivered. The US entered the war. In the meantime immigrant Polish-Zionist chemist Chaim Weizmann offered a solution to the production of enough acetone, a critical ingredient in cordite for artillery shells, to satisfy the war effort. He demanded the same promise. Balfour handed them their ‘receipt’ in November 1917 even though Palestine was not, and never could be, Britain’s to give away.

‘Name of the game: erasing Palestine’

Balfour had inserted into his ‘declaration’ that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing and non-Jewish communities. on the insistence of the only Jew in the British Cabinet, Lord Montague, who was anti-Zionist and opposed the deal. But this safeguard was jettisoned as soon as Britain lost control of events.

Not content with the territory allocated to them under the UN Partition Plan the Israelis declared statehood ignoring all boundaries. Their ‘Plan Dalet’ offensive, begun beforehand, had seized much Arab-designated land at gunpoint. Jewish militia – the Irgun, Haganah, Palmach and Lehi – raided towns and villages forcing inhabitants to flee. Numerous attrocities were committed including the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (headquarters of the British administration) in 1946 murdering 91, and the massacres at Deir Yassin and Lydda in 1948.

Today Israel illegally occupies the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the Old City, and has Gaza in a stranglehold so pitiless as to have caused a long-term humanitarian crisis and irreparable environmental damage. For nearly 70 years millions of dispossessed Palestinians and their families have languished in refugee camps, and those who remain in their homeland – Christian and Muslim alike – live a miserable life under brutal military occupation.

The situation stands as a monumental stain on the flag of the United Nations, which hasn’t the backbone to take action. And the continuing repercussions throughout the Holy Land should concern all true Christians and Muslims especially regular churchgoers like Mrs May.

Miko Peled, the son of an Israeli general and a former soldier in the Israeli army – and now an important figure in the struggle for justice – confirms what many have been saying for years:

The name of the game: erasing Palestine, getting rid of the people and de-Arabizing the country By 1993 the Israelis had achieved their mission to make the conquest of the West Bank irreversible…. That is when Israel said, OK, well begin negotiations

My critic in the local newspaper called Hamas terrorists. Peled describes the Israeli army, in which he served, as one of the best trained and best equipped and best fed terrorist organisations in the world. Take your pick. But Hamas’ political wing is not proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The accusation that criticising the Israeli regime harms Jewish communities is unacceptable. There are many admirable Jewish groups vehemently campaigning against Israel’s crimes. One-time Israeli Military Intelligence chief Yehoshafat Harkabi warned that Jews throughout the world would pay the price of Israel’s misconduct. So the problem appears to be a ‘family’ matter between Jews everywhere.

Stuart Littlewoods book Radio Free Palestine, with Foreword by Jeff Halper, can now be read on the internet by visiting Read other articles by Stuart.

Source Article from

CrossTalking – Neocons Return

CrossTalking – Neocons Return

By CrossTalk

Like a bad cold you cant shake, the neocons are back and they are back with a vengeance. Long associated with the extremist wing of the GOP and tied with catastrophic policy failures, they have now found themselves being embraced by the Democrats and the liberal media. It would seem being anti-Russia attracts strange bedfellows.

CrossTalking with Michael Maloof, George Szamuely, and Andrew Moran.

FACEBOOK: Like CrossTalk on Facebook
SOUNDCLOUD: Listen to CrossTalk+ here…
YOUTUBE: Watch all CrossTalk shows here:… (2015 – Current)… (2013 – 2014)… (2012 – 2013)… (2011 – 2012)… (2009 – 2011)


Subscribe to RT!…

Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Instagram
Follow us on Google+
Listen to us on Soundcloud:

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.

View the original video for CrossTalking – Neocons Return at

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Politics, Public Figures, Television Video & Film.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .

Source Article from

What Trump Is Learning From His Presidency

What Trump Is Learning From His Presidency

By Eric Zuesse.

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at

It is now clear that Donald Trump had never cared about public policy except to the extent it affected his own bottom line as a businessman, and that hes only now starting, as the U.S. President, to think about ideology, and about public policy, and about what the functions of government are and what they ought to be, and how they can most efficiently be carried out in policy. Hes in a learning-mode, now, more than a doing-mode. So: what is he actually learning?

Back on 27 February 2017, after already more than a month as President, he said Nobody knew that healthcare could be so complicated, and that “I have to tell you, it’s an unbelievably complex subject. For him, as someone who never had really thought about it before, this fact (the need for authentic expertise in the interests of the public, not of himself) came as an unpleasant shock after already several weeks in the White House.

He has made clear that hell be happy to sign anything that Republicans in the U.S. Senate and House can have enough agreement with each other about so as to get onto his desk for him to sign into law.

The latest iteration of this is that Trump, it has recently become clear, would even be delighted to sign into law a healthcare bill that would strip away almost all regulations almost all legal limitations on what health insurance companies are allowed to do in the insurance policies they sell. Philip Klein, in the Washington Examiner, on the morning of Wednesday July 19th, headlined Trump calls Mike Lee in attempt to revive Senate healthcare bill , and reported that Trump had just spoken with Senator Lee who along with Rand Paul is one of the Senates two libertarians (believers in eliminating all economic regulations) and Klein reported there that:

Trump reached out to Lee, R-Utah, on Tuesday afternoon to take his temperature and, according to a spokesman for the senator, Lee reiterated his position that he wanted to free the market from Obamacare’s regulations in an effort to drive down premiums and provide more choices.

Trump, according to the spokesman, seemed receptive.

In other words: Trump is receptive to eliminating almost all of the Obama regulations on the insurance policies that insurance companies can sell. Lee, who is a sincerely committed libertarian, has demanded that Obamacare be eliminated altogether before it is replaced, and the reason he has required this is that Obamacare has placed legal limitations upon the insurance policies that are allowed to be sold in the United States, and that Lee wants to get rid of all of them.

Almost everyone in Congress is either an ideologue or else corrupt, or else both (which combination is possible if corruption is acceptable within that persons ideology). Mike Lee is specifically a libertarian ideologue, and no one has been able to corrupt him to violate his ideology, which, one can reasonably infer from this and other examples, excludes him from corruption from selling it out.

Kleins news-report stated, however, that Lee was willing to compromise it, just a little, if the Republicans can strip out all but the most popular Obamacare regulations:

Lee has indicated that he would be inclined to support the bill if it included a provision that he helped write with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that would allow insurers to offer plans that do not have to abide by Obamacare’s regulations as long as they offer plans that meet all of the requirements. Cruz eventually agreed to a compromise that would allow insurers to get around most of the regulations, but that maintained Obamacare’s requirement that all insurers operate a single risk pool in a given state. That means that as written, insurers would be governed by two drastically different regulatory regimes within a single risk pool, which Lee determined would put upward pressure on premiums.

Lee, it is clear, believes that regulations put upward pressure on premiums. Reduce the regulations and the cost of premiums would go down, he believes. But what about the costs that health insurance isnt even covering? Just forget about that, is the attitude. The obsession is: premiums. What a consumer gets for those premiums, most members of Congress dont even care they dont think its their business to be involved in that. Certainly, most of the Republican ones dont. To be involved in that would be regulation and anyone who is even just partially libertarian is against regulation. The very concept has a bad odor to them.

However, that view, libertarianism, is exactly the opposite of the true understanding not only of health care, but even of just health insurance, because all international experience has made unequivocally clear that in order to drive down even only premiums, libertarianism is actually poison: libertarianism actually drives up both health-insurance premiums, and uncovered healthcare costs. Libertarians even people who are only partially and not exclusively that ignore the total picture (which includes both premiums and whats not covered by premiums). But when premiums are being driven down by means of driving up what consumers pay out of their own pockets (i.e., by means of reducing insurance-coverage), consumers tend to put off or delay care until their healthcare-problem becomes very expensive or impossible to treat and thats not at all the efficient way for a healthcare-system to function. It reduces instead of increases health. The obsession of politicians, who dont want to draw attention to the broader picture of driving down all healthcare-costs (while increasing health), including not just premiums but out-of-pocket (uncovered) costs, is premiums, but premiums dont by any means include paying for everything in health care. See the link at the phrase, “quality of care; and the U.S. quality of care is low in comparison to other advanced nations, in this article, wherein Americas unique combination of low quality and astronomically high cost is documented and is also placed into its broader perspective so that it can also be understood, not be at all confusing. This is what public-policymaking is really all about: its about the entire system, if its public-policymaking in an authentic democracy. An incomplete view of the system such as libertarianism demands is toxic to the public. If politicians dont care about the public but only about their big campaign-donors, then calling the holders of public office Representatives of the public is a lie, thats not a real democracy but only a fraudulent one. The U.S. has both the least regulated, and the most expensive, healthcare in the world, and its inferior even to that in many countries where healthcare costs-per-capita are less than half as high as in the United States. Moreover, Americas healthcare also costs twice as high a percentage of GDP as in those other countries. That fact (Americas having by far the costliest, and also one of the lowest quality, healthcare-systems of all industrialized countries) is too complicated for the neophyte policy-thinker Trump to grab hold of (he doesnt really care about it), or for the libertarian ideologue Mike Lee even to care at all about (since it contradicts his false theory, libertarianism); but its undeniably true, nonetheless: America is the corrupt laughingstock of all other countries, when it comes to healthcare. Ideologues such as Lee, and also plain psychopaths such as Trump, have made it become that way; but, still, its not yet enough libertarian to suit them. They want even more of it. (Certainly their megadonors do.)

Libertarianism is actually chaos, and thats what America now has in its healthcare; and its both very expensive and very inefficient. Chaos is unregulated, but it is unbelievably complex, because the options and sub-options in a chaotic social system regarding healthcare or anything else, are so numerous and so incompatible with one-another, so that the less regulated the system (thats provided under the law) is, the more numerous the regulations themselves must necessarily be. There must be exceptions all over the place and this frees up anyone who wants to get an edge on the free market, to do whatever he or she wants to do thus its libertarian, such as the U.S. is famous for being: ideologically committed against socialism, no matter how democratic, how anti-authoritarian, that socialism may, in fact, be. Its all communism they say: Denmark has it, so does Sweden, so do many countries, but did we oppose them during the Cold War? Of course not! That type of thinking is for idiots, but plenty of them exist. And both Lee and Trump want them to wade through all those choices that, even Trump himself now admits, are unbelievably complex. He thinks its complex for him, but not too complex for ordinary hardworking Americans to study fully and carefully enough so that they can intelligently choose the optimum insurance-policy to meet their own actuarial probability of this disease or that disease, or this type of accident, or that type of on-the-job health-risk? Really?

Trump is running into this same learning-curve when it comes to international trade; and, like with healthcare, hes not learning.

Also on July 19th, Shane Savitsky and Jonathan Swan at Axios headlined, “Trump’s own words put his trade policy in jeopardy , and they wrote:

President Trump wants to invoke a national security provision to stop the “dumping” of cheap steel into America, but trade lawyers believe Trump’s public statements and dubious legal reasoning could expose the administration to significant legal problems.

The White House’s rhetoric: The administration in April identified dumping as the impetus for Trump “standing up” for the steel and aluminum industries.

Trump last week on Air Force One:”They’re dumping steel and destroying our steel industry, they’ve been doing it for decades, and I’m stopping it.”

Why it matters: International trade experts, including NYU Law professor Robert Howse, told Axios that Trump made a big mistake by identifying “dumping” as his basis for imposing retaliatory tariffs on national security grounds. There are already laws on the books to remedy dumping, and if Trump invokes the national security provision to impose new tariffs, other nations will immediately challenge him because they’re operating under a World Trade Organization agreement that has no national security exceptions.

The Trump administration has launched an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act to explore how to stop foreign countries “dumping” artificially cheap steel into the U.S. market. The Trump administration labels this a national security threat because it undermines American manufacturers. Trump’s team would likely try to justify its actions to the WTO by citing Article XXI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which allows countries to make trade decisions based on “the protection” of “essential security interests.”

But the White House might never be able to use its preferred defense for steel tariffs using the GATT because the WTO already has a superseding Anti-Dumping Agreement that specifically disciplines such cases and it doesn’t allow for a dumping case based on “national security” or contain any national security exceptions. Given that the administration has been clear that dumping is a centerpiece of its Section 232 investigation, a WTO member could choose [to] bring a legal challenge under the Anti-Dumping Agreement to preempt the administration’s Article XXI plan.

The approach has other problems: Trade experts view Article XXI designed for emergencies or wartime as a third rail in international trade law. If Trump invokes it he would threaten the WTO’s legitimacy and potentially spark a global trade war. The U.S. also has domestic laws surrounding dumping that were recently expanded by Congress early last year, and White House could face a domestic legal challenge to any action against steel dumping for example, from an auto manufacturer or a foreign exporter before it has to face down the WTO.

What trade lawyers are asking: Is this the strategy of a nationalist administration set to paint either an international trade organization or the judicial branch as diametrically opposed to its America first policy or, similar to the roll-out of the travel ban, is the administration not prepared for the impact of the president’s public statements?

This displays from Tump the same incompetency at systems-thinking that he displays in regards to healthcare. He doesnt really give a damn about public policy.

The best thing that can be said about Trump as President is that, unlike his political opponent Hillary Clinton, who had an extensive track-record proving her commitment to overthrowing every head-of-state that is at all friendly toward Russia, and was so determined to do it as to be willing to bring about nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia, Trump just doesnt care at all, except about himself and his family. He had no track-record at all in public life, and, fortunately, had no regime-change in Syria commitment at all (though Americas neoconservative newsmedia still grasp at the straws of hope for him to change on that and thus for him to become even more similar to his opponent than he already is turning out to be). His psychopathy gives the world at least a possibility itll survive his term in the White House. Thus, if Clinton were the President, Id be even less optimistic than I am, about the next few years. Furthermore, there is now the possibility of massive political gridlock in Washington. That could be a great relief. Sometimes, incompetency in a person is a gift to be treasured, to ward off that persons becoming really dangerous or, at least, more dangerous than he/she would otherwise be. But, of course, the same would have been true regarding Mrs. Clinton. And, either way, it was a con, not a functioning democracy. Thats the first thing to understand about America, regardless who won the White House.

UPDATE: Just as this article was being completed, on the evening of July 19th, the neoconservative Washington Post headlined the most important breaking news story thus far in Trumps Presidency, Trump ends covert CIA program to arm anti-Assad rebels in Syria, a move sought by Moscow , and reported, President Trump has decided to end the CIAs covert program to arm and train moderate Syrian rebels battling the government of Bashar al-Assad, a move long sought by Russia, according to U.S. officials. The program was a central plank of a policy begun by the Obama administration in 2013 to put pressure on Assad to step aside, but even its backers have questioned its efficacy since Russia deployed forces in Syria two years later. Obama Administration officials, and other neocons, were quoted there saying such things as, This is a force that we cant afford to completely abandon. If they are ending the aid to the rebels altogether, then that is a huge strategic mistake. These moderate rebels, as the U.S. regime and its newsmedia called them, were overwhelmingly jihadists, whom Obama had been using as cheap boots-on-the-ground proxies for far costlier American corpses so as to overthrow Assad and install a pro-Saud Islamic Sharia-law regime to run Syria instead; Hillary Clinton had been intent upon finishing that job even if it would mean war against Russia. This action by Trump is a sea-change for the better. It is a heroic act by a U.S. President whom the U.S. aristocracy have been trying to oust (in favor of the committed neoconservative Mike Pence) so as to overthrow Assad and any other head-of-state who is allied with Russia. Maybe Trump is learning something important, after all. And maybe he is starting to care, finally, about the welfare of the American public. The present observer, at any rate, is again in a wait-and-see mode, about him.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.


View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Source Article from

Four German women who joined Islamic State detained in Iraq

Four German women who joined Islamic State detained in Iraq

One of the Germans had Moroccan roots and another seemed to come from Chechnya

July 22, 2017

Four German women, including a 16-year-old girl, who joined Islamic State in recent years are being held in an Iraqi prison and receiving consular assistance, Der Spiegel magazine reported on Saturday.

It said diplomats had visited the four in a prison at the airport in BAGHDAD on Thursday and they were doing well given the circumstances. They could face the death penalty in Iraq for belonging to the militant group, the magazine added.

It said Iraqi authorities had given Germany a list with the women’s names at the beginning of the week, identifying the teenager only as Linda W. from the small town of Pulsnitz near the eastern city of Dresden.

Germany’s Foreign Ministry declined to comment on the report.

Read more

RELATED: Eyewitness To Mass Extermination Of Christians In The Middle East Tells All

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, ISIS, Middle East, Prison Planet Articles, Syria, Television Video & Film.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .

Source Article from

VIDEO: The China-Israel Joint Committee on Innovation Cooperation

Hello Zionist Report Followers!

As you know, our mission is to EXPOSE THE TRUTH. And, we need your help to achieve it.

We are a team of two journalists that are tirelessly working on this mission. We have grown tremendously since we launched in January. And now we are looking to take our growth to the next step with EXCLUSIVE content. We are asking for donations to make this next step reality. The money will be for equipment upgrades to provide you with exclusive videos and articles. In addition, the donations will go to improve the site through custom applications and plug-ins. Lastly, we will hire a freelance journalist to give us fresh video content from Palestine.

Please support us! Any bit would help! Thank you! 

$5,000 USD is our initial goal – please help us achieve it.

Source Article from

INTERVIEW: Israeli Restrictions At Al-Aqsa (Temple Mount) Mosque Spark Protests

Hello Zionist Report Followers!

As you know, our mission is to EXPOSE THE TRUTH. And, we need your help to achieve it.

We are a team of two journalists that are tirelessly working on this mission. We have grown tremendously since we launched in January. And now we are looking to take our growth to the next step with EXCLUSIVE content. We are asking for donations to make this next step reality. The money will be for equipment upgrades to provide you with exclusive videos and articles. In addition, the donations will go to improve the site through custom applications and plug-ins. Lastly, we will hire a freelance journalist to give us fresh video content from Palestine.

Please support us! Any bit would help! Thank you! 

$5,000 USD is our initial goal – please help us achieve it.

Source Article from

Notorious Abortionist Lauded By Pope Francis To Speak At Catholic Church In Italy

RONCO DI CASSATO, Italy, July 19, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) Emma Bonino, a former abortionist once praised by Pope Francis as “a great Italian,” will appear in a Catholic church to present the pro-migrant campaign “ERO STRANIERO: La humanità che fa bene” (“I was a stranger: Humanity that does good” 

As an abortion rights activist and an abortionist herself, Bonino is directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of approximately six million Italian babies between 1968 and today.

Bonino’s appearance in the Church of San Defendente, Ronco di Cassato, on July 26 will be one of several events celebrating World Refugee Day 2017. The moderator of Bonino’s talk will be parish priest Don Mario Marchiori.

On his blog “Stilum Curae,” Vatican-based journalist Marco Tosatti remarked dryly that

“One assumes that now, after having helped deprive this country of an enormous number of human beings, [Bonino] will be able — in church — to push for a nice ethnic replacement program in Italy.”

More than 500,000 migrants have entered Italy in the past three years.

Bonino came to the attention of Catholics outside her native Italy when in 2016 Pope Francis told an interviewer for the Corriere della Sera that she was “among the great ones of Italy.”

To those who “blink” at Francis’ admiration for Bonino, Francis cited Bonino’s work for refugees:

“She is the person who understands Africa best. And she has offered the best service to Italy through understanding Africa.”

Francis told his interviewer that he has been told Bonino is someone “who thinks very differently from us. But [I say] patience. You have to look at people, what they do.”

Bonino, now 69, had an illegal abortion at age 27 and, as she told an interviewer for feminist website European Database, the experience inspired her to go into politics. In 1975, she began to work as a volunteer abortionist for the Italian Information Center on Sterilization and Abortion she founded with Adela Faccio. Bonino personally performed 10,000 abortions. After four months abroad evading arrest, she returned to Italy and served a 10-day prison term. She believes her arrest caused the abortion issue to “burst” in Italy. Certainly, it propelled her into the limelight. For more than 40 years, she has been a hero to Italian left-wing media.

Bonino joined the Italian Partito Radicale (Radical Party) in the mid-1970s and was first elected to government in 1976. Until 1978, her primary mission was the legalization of abortion. Having achieved it, she turned her attention to liberalizing Italian divorce laws.

With friend and colleague Marco Pannella, a founder of the Radicals, Bonino championed a number of left-wing causes, including the legalization of recreational drugs, the banning of a national nuclear energy program, nudism, same-sex “marriage,” transgenderism, the abolition of the armed forces, the disbanding of NATO, the liberalization of porn laws, and mandatory sex education. According to Family Domani, Bonino identifies with the 1970s feminist slogan “No longer wives, daughters, and mothers! Let’s destroy the family!” With the rest of the Italian Radical party, she threw in her lot with FUORI (Fronte Unitario Omosessuale Rivoluzionario Italiano — or United Revolutionary Front of Italian Homosexuals) in the 1970s.

Recently Bonino has taken up the cause of mass migration to Italy from Africa and the Middle East. WIthout irony, she says this migration is necessary to Italy’s survival because of the low Italian birth rate. She is calling for the integration of the migrants, to save them from homelessness and human trafficking.

Just as Pope Francis admires her work for migrants, so Bonino admires Pope Francis. In a recent interview with the Financial Times, she praised Francis for changing the Catholic Church: “As long as he lasts, as long as he hangs on, it is less of a stepmother, it is more inclusive,” Bonino said. “I’m not practicing, I’m not even Catholic, but my family is. They felt rejected and now they feel much more welcome.”

Bonino has no children.

Source Article from

VIDEO: AIPAC & The US/Israeli Strategic Partnership Act

Hello Zionist Report Followers!

As you know, our mission is to EXPOSE THE TRUTH. And, we need your help to achieve it.

We are a team of two journalists that are tirelessly working on this mission. We have grown tremendously since we launched in January. And now we are looking to take our growth to the next step with EXCLUSIVE content. We are asking for donations to make this next step reality. The money will be for equipment upgrades to provide you with exclusive videos and articles. In addition, the donations will go to improve the site through custom applications and plug-ins. Lastly, we will hire a freelance journalist to give us fresh video content from Palestine.

Please support us! Any bit would help! Thank you! 

$5,000 USD is our initial goal – please help us achieve it.

Source Article from

Smoking Is Being Wiped Out Without Having To Ban It

Smoking rates have been slowly falling in Western countries for decades. Soon, the habit could be wiped out, without even having to ban it.

Most of us in the West are an unhealthy lot: we eat junk food, drink too much alcohol, exercise too little and generally ignore medical advice designed to help us live longer.

But there is one thing we are listening to our doctors about. Smoking rates have been slowly falling, year on year, in most Western countries for decades.

This month saw the 10-year anniversary of England’s ban on smoking in enclosed workplaces – including bars and restaurants – a change that once would have seemed inconceivable.

The UK government is due to announce new tobacco control strategies for the next few years.

The decline of smoking is emboldening some public health officials to plan for what is sometimes called the tobacco endgame – stubbing out smoking completely.

But several strategies to reach this goal have potential pitfalls, and some could even be counterproductive.

So is a smoke-free future ever going to happen, and what could we do to bring it about?

Smoking was a minority pursuit until the late 19th century and the arrival of one of the deadliest inventions in history: industrially produced cigarettes.

Their popularity soared during the first world war, as soldiers were given cigarettes with their rations.

Celebrities, athletes and even doctors endorsed the habit. At its peak in the mid-20th century, around half of all adults in the UK and the US smoked.

But the evidence was building that smoking causes lung cancer, as well as heart attacks, strokes and other diseases.

The risks were denied by tobacco companies for decades, but the tide of public opinion was turning.

As governments brought in an increasing array of tobacco control measures, from health warnings on cigarette packs to advertising bans and restrictions on where people can light up, smoking rates have slowly declined.

A long-standing fear, however, has been that the fall would stop because of a hard core of smokers impervious to all health advice.

“People always used to say you can never get below 25 per cent,” says Martin Dockrell of Public Health England.

“In the UK, adult smoking rates are now down to about 16 per cent, in the US, 15 per cent”

But this hasn’t happened. In the UK, adult smoking rates are now down to about 16 per cent, in the US, 15 per cent. So how long could this trend continue?

Some think there is practically no limit, including Stanton Glantz at the University of California, San Francisco, a long-time tobacco control crusader.

He says that while smoking will never be completely wiped out, the habit could be eliminated “as a public health problem of substantial consequence” – in other words, smoking rates could be reduced to just a few per cent.

Some countries already have this goal in sight. New Zealand, which has long had some of the world’s strictest tobacco control laws, aims to get adult smoking down to below 5 per cent by 2025.

Finland is aiming for this by 2030, including the use of chewing tobacco and e-cigarettes.

A Plan To Ban

But is this goal enough? Despite all the health warnings, some argue that people assume cigarettes can’t be that bad if you can still buy them everywhere.

Perhaps a full ban is the only way to get the message across.

To date, only one country has dared go this far. In 2004, the Himalayan nation of Bhutan outlawed the sale of all cigarettes and chewing tobacco.

People can buy them legally abroad, but there is a limit on what they can bring into the country.

Western nations probably shouldn’t look to Bhutan’s ban as a guide, though, as even before it came in, the country’s smoking rate was estimated at just a few per cent.

It is also very different culturally. The main religion is Tibetan Buddhism, which encourages people to keep a clear mind so they can meditate, says Michael Givel at the University of Oklahoma.

“Tobacco hasn’t been as big a cultural thing as elsewhere.”

Aside from the question of whether it is ethical to stop people doing something they enjoy, this kind of ban may also backfire. History tells us that prohibition fuels criminal suppliers.

This happened in the 1920s when alcohol sales were banned in the US, and still goes on today with illegal recreational drugs such as heroin.

“There are all sorts of scary unintended consequences that could come along with prohibition,” says Dockrell.

Use could even increase, he says, as illicit cigarettes would be much cheaper and lack health warnings.

“You’re much more effective at regulating products if they’re legal,” says Deborah Arnott of UK anti-smoking group Action on Smoking and Health.

It’s hard to know the effect of the ban in Bhutan as there is no reliable data, but seizures of smuggled tobacco in the country rose more than three-fold between 2005 and 2008.

“If anyone claims they can get rid of smoking based on the Bhutan model, the evidence is fairly to the contrary,” says Givel.

There are other strategies on the table. One sometimes floated is the introduction of a minimum age for buying cigarettes that rises each year.

Existing smokers could carry on, but youngsters wouldn’t legally be able to start.

Such a law has been debated in the Tasmanian parliament in Australia, although it has never been introduced anywhere, partly because it raises the same problem of fostering a black market for those under the age limit.

Others have suggested forcing the tobacco industry to alter the make-up of cigarettes, such as making them slightly more alkaline to deter deep inhalation.

This would make them more like the harsh old-style “gaspers”, as cigarettes used to be known in the UK. But again, milder, black-market cigarettes would win out.

“In 2004, the nation of Bhutan outlawed the sale of all cigarettes and chewing tobacco.”

The best approach, says Glantz, is to continue raising taxes, and further restrict advertising and where people can smoke in public.

The next target should be cutting out smoking in movies and other media, he says, perhaps by giving any films that contain smoking a high age rating.

Studies show that the more that teenagers see smoking on screen, the more likely they are to take it up. “It’s a bigger effect than conventional advertising,” says Glantz.

And what about those who really don’t want to give up smoking? They may be able to wean themselves off using e-cigarettes.

Since they were first mooted, these devices, which vaporise nicotine without producing smoke, have divided public health experts.

In most of the West, particularly the US and Australia, the mainstream view is that they are almost as dangerous as ordinary cigarettes.

In the UK, on the other hand, vaping is increasingly seen as a useful aid to help people quit smoking, like nicotine gum.

Public Health England says e-cigarettes are 95 per cent safer than smoking, and that we should consider letting people vape in places where smoking is banned – sometimes even indoors.

“There’s no evidence of harm to bystanders, and by prohibiting vaping you might undermine people’s attempts to give up smoking,” says Dockrell.

He would even like to see doctors be able to prescribe e-cigarettes on the NHS.

One study illustrates how vaping has been shown to reduce carcinogens by almost 98 percent in former smokers who dropped their cigarette habit and switched to vaporizers.

The latest UK figures also seem to contradict the idea that e-cigarettes are a gateway to smoking.

Vaping took off around 2010, and since that time the rate of decline in smoking has, if anything, slightly steepened.

On the other hand, smoking rates are falling in the US and Australia, where vaping is more frowned on. Perhaps in a few years’ time, we will know which approach is right.

Glantz predicts that as smoking continues to fall, it will become less socially acceptable to light up when among non-smokers or even just out in public.

Studies suggest that smoking bans in indoor workplaces help people to keep their own houses smoke-free, even if they smoke themselves.

“The current policies are working,” he says. “We just need to do them more.”

By Claire Wilson, Guest author

Source Article from

The Best Form of Meditation You’re (Probably) Not Doing

You might know this about me already, but I’m a big advocate for meditation of all kinds. 

There are a multitude of different types of meditation options available. With so many options, it can be pretty confusing to know what to do and what will work best for you.

I’m going to touch briefly on two popular types of meditation for this article, and then dive into a third type that is my personal favorite.

The first type of meditation is one pretty much everyone has heard of:

Transcendental Meditation, or which falls into the category of “mantra meditation,” where the practitioner repeats a mantra silently in order to calm the stream of thoughts that arise from the mind.

TM has become a big business in the U.S. and is fairly expensive to get started with, but even with that facet in the mix, many people can attest that TM was the first meditation practice that they were able to continue to do long-term, which makes it a win in my book.

Meditation type number two is Guided Visualization, which I am obviously quite fond of, given my penchant for producing them.

One big advantage of guided visualization is that it can allow someone who normally has trouble quieting the mind to have a meditative, healing experience.

It can also allow someone to tap into the meditative benefits of an experienced meditator by following in their footsteps, so to speak.

Our third type of meditation is what I consider the most important form of meditation in my own life, and I call it simply, “Silence Meditation” although it is also often referred to as “Mindfulness Meditation,” which I consider slightly different.

You might be surprised to hear that I don’t use guided visualizations since I produce so many of them, but that’s exactly the reason I don’t utilize them: I tend to like my own versions better.

So what is Silence Meditation? It is the simple, but not easy, act of sitting in total silence, with a focus on achieving a complete stillness in the mind.

A total absence of thought, even for just a few moments.

This is simple in concept, but difficult in practice, because the mind’s nature is to produce thought and it does so consistently all day and even at night when we’re in REM sleep.

Yes, our nighttime dreams are a form of thought expressing itself, and the thoughts only cease when we go down into the deepest levels of Delta sleep.

How to Silence the Mind… For a Few Moments

Upon reading the above, the mind naturally will produce a question: “How can someone use the mind to silence their mind?”

There are almost as many ways of achieving this silence as there are meditators in the world, which means that there is no one right way to do it.

Since there isn’t a single “right way,” I will just tell you how I do it for myself, because my methods are somewhat unconventional.  No surprise there, right?

First is the setup, or how I sit.  I use a “V” shaped meditation cushion and place it in front of my couch so that I can rest my back against it. You could use a wall for this purpose, too.

This goes against the grain of meditation teachers who want people to sit fully upright with no back support.

That’s great for a photo-shoot, but the reason I use something for back support is because I don’t want to be distracted by thinking about what position my body is in during meditation.

By sitting upright on my pillow while supporting my back with my couch, I eliminate one of the major distractions of sitting and meditating.

For your own practice, feel free to simply sit in a chair that allows you to have upright posture. Go with whatever is the most simple and supportive for your body.

Next is blocking out the external world, which I achieve with ear plugs and a blind-fold.  More specifically, I use a pair of sound-isolating “ear-buds” for playing audio.

They block outside sounds better than regular ear plugs, and allow me to use one of the Genius Brain Power audio tracks to help assist my meditation if I so choose. Usually an Alpha or Theta track.

Some would consider using brainwave entrainment cheating or a crutch, but if it works for the individual, I say go for it.

Now to be fair, I personally only use entrainment audio once in a while when the background noise level is too high for the ear-buds alone to block.

95% of the time I just use the ear-buds with no audio because they work better for me than standard foam ear plugs.

Keep in mind that the ear plugs are optional, but if you find yourself being distracted by background noise while meditating, then I recommend trying out some ear plugs for a few sessions.

As for the blindfold, any type of blindfold will suffice, and if necessary you can improvise with whatever you have around.

Even a long-sleeve shirt will do in a pinch. Enough said there.

Time Enough for Self-Love

With the setup handled, it’s time to start meditating, right? Almost. One more important thing:  Use a timer!

You don’t want to be distracted by thinking about how long you’ve been meditating, so a simple kitchen timer will alert you when your pre-determined time is up.

But how long should you meditate? That is entirely up to you!

I personally meditate in this fashion for 22 minutes in the early morning, which is long enough to get the job done, and short enough that I won’t make up an excuse not to do it.

I arrived at 22 minutes in a somewhat arbitrary fashion. I started out at 10 minutes, and added one minute a day until I was at 20 minutes.

Later I added one more minute as an easy way to accomplish 5% more meditation. Eventually I went up one more minute to 22 simply because I like repeating numbers.

So 22 is my “magic number,” but your number might be smaller, especially at first, and that’s fine!

You could start with just 5 minutes if you need to, and gradually add one minute per day until you are at a number you feel is giving you the results you desire.

The most important part of choosing your meditation duration is to start small and gradually increase the time each day that you meditate IF you want.

If the number feels small and easy to do, then you are far more likely to do it than if you choose a number that feels like an arduous task, or an amount of time that could make you late for work, an appointment, etc.

A shorter duration is better for those days when you’re not getting into a deep meditative state and you’re constantly silencing mind-chatter without enjoying any mental quietness.

Speaking from experience, the temptation to “bail out” of the process is far smaller if I know that I won’t have to struggle with that day’s meditation for too long.

The Actual “Silence Meditation” Process

I’m seated, ears are plugged, eyes blind-folded, the timer has started and now it’s time to actually meditate.

The first thing I do is start breathing slowly and deeply, putting all of my focus on my breath. After years of practice this alone produces a few moments of blissful mental silence.

But not for long! No sir! My wonderful mind has all kinds of lovely thoughts it wants me to entertain.

So when the first thought comes up, I use a mental prompt to release it: Clear the Deck.

As I think those words, I also direct my mind to a brief visualization of the deck of a wooden boat, out at sea, with nothing but blue skies and blue water in every direction, and I imagine that the thoughts are being swept off the deck, down into the water.

Then I let the visualization fade away and return to focus on my breath.

Silence. Breath. Silence. “I need to mail that check to…” (or whatever thought bubbles up).

Yes, the silence doesn’t last for long, especially in the early days and weeks of meditation, and sometimes even after years of practice.

But that’s ok! The mind produces thoughts. That’s one of its main jobs and it can take a lot of training to get it to go into that deep silence.

When that thought arises, and it always does, I will name the type of thought, which is a form of acceptance and acknowledgement.

I don’t want to fight my mind, only to direct it, so I acknowledge the thought with one word whenever possible.

Examples: Planning, anticipating, ruminating, reminiscing, worrying, analyzing, imagining, judging, speculating.

Once I name the thought, I use my next mental prompt which is: Let it go. So it would “sound” (in my mind) like, “Planning… Let it go.”  Yep, I keep things simple!

Silence. Breath. Silence. “I wonder if I’ll have time to exercise before breakfast.” “Oh… Anticipating…Let it go.”

Silence. Breath. Silence. “That guy trolling my blog really needs to get a life.” “Ahhh…judging…Let it go.”

Two More Prompts

I also use two more mental prompts to help deepen the meditative state. Over time these have become commands which my mind (usually) obeys. The first one is “Go Deep.”

This pretty consistently puts me into a deeper brainwave state, which I can feel happening because I have practiced it for years, both with and without brainwave entrainment.

The other prompt is “Go Clear” which very nicely clears away any stray thoughts.

I tend to use these prompts after releasing a thought with “Let it go” in order to deepen the meditative state and extend the amount of time where no thoughts are floating through my mind.

Slow It Down

I like to “speak”  all of those thought-prompts very slowly in my mind.

For example, if I’m thinking “Go Clear,” I will think “Gooooooooooo” on the in breath, and “Clearrrrrrrrrr” on the out breath.

Slowing down the thoughts helps lead me back to the state of non-thought more easily.

This is Too Hard!

When most people first try this style of meditation, they often don’t have much success at quieting the mind. That’s ok!

The fact that you took some time to sit up straight, breathe deeply and even attempt to meditate is huge!

Seriously, you should congratulate yourself after every meditation session, no matter how “good” or “bad” it seemed to be.

Even if you spent the entire time “clearing the deck” and “letting it go” with no observable quieting of the mind, you should STILL give yourself a pat on the back for putting in the time and effort.

Then do it again tomorrow.

With regular practice (daily is best) you will start to have moments of pure mental silence, and over time those moments will grow longer and more frequent.

There can still be bad days where you can’t put the thoughts aside, and that’s ok, too!

Remind yourself that whatever is happening in your mind is ok.  Don’t fight the mind, just do your best to guide it gently into that place of silent rest.

These Prompts Don’t Work For Me!

This is where things get personal. Not that I will take it personally if my prompts don’t work for you, but personal in the sense that everyone will respond differently to the process of guiding their own mind into a place of silence.

The prompts that I use just might not work for you, which means that you’ll need to come up with some of your own.

I think it’s fine to figure that out during the meditation session, since if the prompts you are using aren’t working, you might as well spend that time to audition some new prompts.

However, and this is a big however, I recommend that you don’t give up on the prompts until you have tried them a few times.

Why? Because using the same prompts repeatedly over time conditions the mind to respond to those prompts more effectively.

What’s the Point?

I know life is busy, and often the first things that we drop when we are pressed for time are self-care and self-empowering practices.

However, if you can give yourself the gift of just 5-20 minutes per day of meditation practice, you will start to reap many rewards.

The state of no-thought is incredibly calming, soothing and even blissful. Five seconds of mental silence is like giving your mind a massage or warm bath.

This produces mental, emotional and physical relaxation, reduces inflammation and releases beneficial hormones in the body.

With practice, this or any other type of meditation practice will help you to have “space” between stimulus (stress) and response (reaction) in your environment.

Instead of cursing at the guy who cuts you off in traffic, you might find yourself taking a deep breath and saying, “Let it go” instead.

After all, that other driver can’t hear your words and your inner peace is more valuable than anger, especially when you’re driving.

Instead of snapping at your spouse/ child/ parent/ sibling/ co-worker/ etc. when they push your buttons, you could find yourself taking a deep breath and calmly explaining what you truly want to communicate to them.

Those “little victories” in our day feel really good, and regular meditation can help them to happen more organically, more often.

Best Time of Day?

Opinions vary on the best time of day to meditate.

For years I was more of a night-time meditator, but when I switched to meditating in the morning I found that it had profound, beneficial impacts on my state of being for the rest of the day.

Putting it simply, silence meditation in the morning makes me generally happier, less impatient and more compassionate on days that I do it compared to days where I come up with an excuse to skip it, which is very rare.  

Limiting my morning meditation time to 22 minutes almost completely removes any thought of skipping it, where for mysterious psychological reasons, a 30 minute meditation is easier to skip “because I’m running late” or some other excuse.

Keeping it short and easy to achieve is the key to success in morning meditation.

Take the 5×7 Test Drive

Often one of the biggest self-imposed barriers to trying a something new is the belief that if we start doing it, we have to do that new thing forever, so we don’t even start.

So forget about forever, and instead just take a test drive of doing a silence meditation for 5 minutes per day for 7 days.

That’s it. Just 35 minutes of time over the course of a week.

If you can commit to that small investment, it is possible that you will like the results so much that you decide to keep the practice, but you are not obligated by anyone, especially yourself, to do so.

Share Your Experience

Do you already meditate like this? If so, please leave a comment for how you achieve those delicious moments of mental silence.

Your setup, your inner prompts, any helpful tips for others, etc.

Are you trying this for the first time, or picking it back up again? Let me know how it’s going for you down below.

I will leave the comment section on this post open for 10 days.

Much Love,
Cameron Day

Source Article from

3 Truths That Come To Light When You Expand Your Consciousness

“What you are seeking is seeking you” – Rumi

I knew that I always liked this quote, without really knowing why.

To be honest, for the longest time I never really understood what it meant. Then, everything changed.

1. Discovering the Light

In Daosim, it is believed that the journey to enlightenment starts by turning the eyes inside out and there is an african proverb that states “when there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot touch you”.

As we have all learned by now, the way that view the world around us, is a projection of our inner world, and so our quest for happiness, enlightenment and satisfaction lies primarily upon filling our selves with light and love in order to then radiate it into the world.

Sadly however, as a defence mechanism, we seek to avoid the inner work of illuminating the shadows in our minds and neglect doing what is necessary, to reach an enlightened state.

New age spirituality for instance, relies too heavily on focusing on the love and light aspect; when we seek out, search for, or try to attain this light we are essentially chasing our own tails.

That is what Rumi is portraying when he makes this statement. We become like dogs and cats spinning around in circles, all the while missing the point. Rumi, I feel had a very good sense of humour.

The point being, we are the light because we are awareness and when we can increase our awareness, we expand our consciousness.

That is, we make the unseen-seen and bring unconscious thought forward into a consciously understandable level.

You see, awareness is like a field of energy, “awareness is in your whole being, awareness of itself is like a light inside, do not imagine in as the sort of light you see, light and awareness is one of the same thing” – Mai Agate Valjataga

2. Reconnecting to Unity Consciousness

All is one. We are all one. We are all connected and every man and woman is your brother and your sister. This isn’t religious, this is science.

While there are many interpretations of unity consciousness, and many perceptions to be had. Today I will give you a glimpse of mine own.

I am not asking that you believe it, I am not telling you to take it as the “gospel”. What I am going to tell is that this is my perception.

This is what I saw when I found the light, when I projected out of my body and into the universe and this is what resonates with me.

The universe, is sexual. The universe is playful. The universe is God. My physical body is the projection of my creator because I am just a cell in its body.

I see that the planets are also cells, and we are cells within those same cells. My aura is my protoplasm and my body is the nucleus.

The entire universe is creation at all moments, cell multiplication and death. I see the big bang as the moment the sperm entered the egg.

I see the milky way as the semen of the gods, and I see that I am a universe. Because I am capable of creating life, and I am part of creation, I am also a god.

When we create life we are creating a universe of cells, with their own unique consciousness, no matter how small.

I see that my soul is a spark in the night sky, a star, and when I leave my physical body and ascend into the heavens, I will shine bright for all to see. You and me.

“Every human being knows everything as all that is needed to know is contained in the memory of their cells and the zero point quantum field.

“The only problem is they have yet to discover how to read that field” – Mai Agate Valjataga, Kreet Rosin Excerpt from Your Every Feeling Creates You

3. The Immortal Foundation of the Soul

It was once believed, that a person cannot be truly considered a soul incarnate until it possesses pure and genuine compassion for others. I find this to be extremely poetic.

Compassion, while it sounds like a simple and common word. It isn’t always easy to attain and uphold a higher perspective.

To put your ego aside and elevate yourself to a level of understanding which sees every being as child.

That is to say, we are all infants in the universe and to rise above and “take the high road” as they call it, takes an enlightened mind.

A soul who has found the light within, and makes the conscious choice to be righteous in judgement, righteous in understanding and righteous love.

Righteousness, to me doesn’t me being right. It means showing love, compassion and understanding, no matter what you think is right.

By LJ Vanier, Guest author

Source Article from

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes