Jew World Order

Automation looms large over industrial sectors around the world, and Iran is no different. The arrival of what is being called the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” was the focus of the 2016 World Economic Forum in Davos. The “Future of Jobs” report published during as part of the annual gathering made waves for its prediction of rapid and dramatic shifts in the composition of workforces worldwide. The report predicted over 1.6 million lost jobs in the manufacturing sector by 2020 across a sample of 20 countries that included developed economies such as the United States, Germany, and Japan, as well as rising economies such as China, India, Brazil and South Africa.

While Iran was not one of the country’s sampled in the report, the findings did cover Turkey, which is a strong proxy for Iran given the similar size and composition of its labor force. Employment in the manufacturing sector will actually increase in Turkey through 2020. Similar increases are forecasted for Mexico and South Africa. The report evidences how the pace of economic growth in emerging markets in the next 5-10 years will mean an expansion, rather than contraction in blue-collar jobs. The trend should hold true for Iran.

However, the report’s authors also note that the implementation of automation technologies will only begin to gain momentum globally between 2018 and 2020, when “Advanced robots with enhanced senses, dexterity, and intelligence” which “can be more practical than human labour in manufacturing” begin to account for a greater number of the roles on the production line.

Realistically, the adoption of these expensive technologies in less-developed economies such as Iran will take place later, but as adoption increases the next generation of automation technologies will become less expensive in the same period when Iranian labor begins to grow more expensive as wages rise during the post-sanctions economic recovery. This combination of events will make automation even more appealing. Inbound investment will be used to improve efficiency and productivity in the manufacturing sector and capital intensive automation will be justified based on economies of scale made possible as Iran’s exports rebound.

Already, companies like German robotic arm manufacturer Kuka have helped modernize the assembly lines at Iran Khodro and other Iranian automakers. While such improvements to efficiency have helped Iran’s auto-industry become more competitive by international standards, thereby justifying the new wave of potential investment from the likes of Renault, Daimler, and Volkswagen, the long-term profitability of these sectors could depend on reductions to the workforce.

The experience of European automakers in their domestic markets is instructive. On average, a European Union auto worker produces the equivalent of 7 vehicles per year. In Iran, which has approximately 500,000 autoworkers and an annual vehicle production of about 1 million, the worker-to-vehicle productivity ratio is just 2. In the medium-term, an improvement in Iran’s productivity ratio would necessitate both increases in automation and also reductions to the workforce.

For the Rouhani administration, this presents a stark dilemma. How do you usher in an economic agenda to serve the people, if the new agenda will also usher in technologies that could upend employment opportunities for the working classes?

Over the last few years, many of Rouhani’s critics have taken to labeling him a neoliberal, the implication being that his pursuit of economic growth will come at the expense of blue-collar workers. Rouhani’s ability to address the concern will depend on his ability to ensure that “knowledge transfer” follows investment.

When asked how they intend to manage impending shifts in labor markets, 65% respondents in “Future of Jobs” report cited “reskilling current employees” as the fundamental strategy for basic industries, including blue-collar work such as manufacturing and construction. But while rich countries like Switzerland and Sweden that face this dilemma can experiment with ideas such as universal income or mass retraining of the workforce, for Iran, these issues are far more delicate.

As World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and board member Richard Samans write in the preface of the report:

It is critical that businesses take an active role in supporting their current workforces through re-training, that individuals take a proactive approach to their own lifelong learning and that governments create the enabling environment, rapidly and creatively, to assist these efforts.

For the biscuit company, the opportunities to retrain staff for new roles are numerous. Whereas 200 individuals work in the company, just a dozen are involved in the distribution and sales of the company’s products. There are essentially no formalized teams in sales and marketing, business services, retail partnerships, human resources, or corporate and legal affairs despite robust annual revenues. So while the overall proportion of manufacturing labor may decline, the growth of companies like the biscuit maker, should also open the door to opportunities in other job roles.

Looking to the breakdown of the Mondelez workforce in the UK, of the 5000 total employees, two-thirds are directly involved in manufacturing. By this standard the Iranian biscuit company should have nearly 10 times the current number of commercial staff given the size of the manufacturing staff.

Indeed, the “Future of Jobs Report” forecasts job growth in business and financial operations, management, and sales functions across the sampled countries. For Iran, the challenge will be to make sure blue-collar employees are empowered to make the leap into these new roles.