Head Blows May Hamper Learning in College Athletes

WEDNESDAY, May 16 (HealthDay News) — Using tests of mental
function and special helmets to measure impact from hits to the head, a
new study found that some college athletes in contact sports showed signs
of temporary decline in learning ability following repetitive head
injuries.

Followed over a single season, 24 percent of football and hockey
players performed poorly on a postseason test of new learning compared to
4 percent of athletes in non-contact sports, such as track, crew and
cross-country skiing.

However, cumulative effects from years of playing hockey or football
were not seen in these athletes from three NCAA Division I schools, and
most players showed no decline in learning capacity at the season’s end,
the researchers said.

“Across the board, the contact athletes that were hitting their heads
in their sports were not performing differently at the beginning of the
season or significantly so at the end of the season, if you were just
looking at the group averages,” said study author Dr. Thomas McAllister.
“To a certain extent I think this is reassuring and good news.”

But “there may be a subgroup of athletes that for hitting their heads
over and over again, it’s not a good thing,” said McAllister, a
distinguished professor of psychiatry and neurology at Geisel School of
Medicine at Dartmouth.

More research is needed to determine if this damage is short-term or
long-lasting, the authors said.

The study, published in the May 16 online edition of Neurology,
looked at 214 varsity football and hockey players enrolled at Brown
University, Dartmouth College and Virginia Tech between 2007 and 2010.
They were compared with 45 non-contact sport athletes.

Most of the athletes were male. None had a history of concussion, and
this study did not focus on concussion.

For the study, the contact-sport players wore special helmets fitted
with devices that counted head impacts above a certain force and recorded
different types of acceleration, such as “rotational acceleration —
around the center of gravity of the head,” McAllister explained.

During a season, contact players sustained 469 hits to the head, on
average.

To look at possible effects of all these hits on classroom performance,
athletes took a computerized “ImPACT” test — widely used to screen for
concussion — right before and after their season to look for declines in
thinking and memory skills. Overall, no significant differences were seen
between contact or non-contact players.

Also, “there was no evidence for a cumulative effect over the years,”
McAllister said.

Digging deeper, the researchers gave a smaller group of athletes from
just one school a more extensive battery of neuropsychological tests.

They found that in one test of verbal learning ability, “close to four
times as many of the contact-sport athletes were doing [significantly]
more poorly than one would have otherwise predicted,” McAllister said.

He said other research suggests that genetic differences might make
some players more vulnerable to the effects of head injury than
others.

Dr. Howard Derman, medical director of the Methodist Concussion Center
in Houston, said that he would not conclude that most of the players had
been unharmed. Because the study only tested athletes before and after the
season, the findings “would give me a false sense of security,” he
said.

Testing throughout the season would be more likely to pick up
short-term changes in brain function, he said.

“What if they do a baseline test, then one at four weeks, one at eight
weeks and one at 12?” Derman suggested. “So if we can say [at any point]
there was a difference, that may imply that there may be something going
on, and just at the end, it’s recovered. But that doesn’t mean there
hasn’t been microscopic damage to the brain during those periods.”

“The implication — that there’s no change with the ImPACT study,
therefore there’s no change in the brain — is not a conclusion I would
reach, unless there were no changes in the ImPACT test sequentially during
that time,” he said.

Results from this research can’t be extrapolated to non-college
athletes, the study noted. It was funded by the U.S. National Institutes
of Health and the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic
Equipment.

More information

Learn about severe brain damage at Boston University’s Center for
the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy
.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes