Men’s Legs May Be New Source for Hair Transplants

WEDNESDAY, Feb. 22 (HealthDay News) — Doctors may have a leg up
on baldness: Transplanting hair from a patient’s legs to his head for what
may be a more natural look.

In the February issue of the Archives of Dermatology, Dr. Sanusi
Umar explained that the finer, softer hair found on the leg is an ideal
candidate for hair grafts that aim to recreate the hairline.

“The whole idea is to take hair transplantation to the next level,”
said Umar, a private practitioner in Redondo Beach, Calif., and clinical
instructor in dermatology at the University of California, Los
Angeles.

There are “several problems” with traditional methods for hairline
transplant, he believes.

“First, the traditional transplant takes hair from the middle of the
back of the head, and that hair happens to be the thickest hair on the
head,” he said. That means that, “if you take it from there and put it in
the hairline, despite your best efforts, it will end up slightly
harsh[-looking] and unnatural in the hairline. It’s problematic to say the
least,” Umar explained.

“The other issue is that people bald or thin to varying degrees,” he
noted. “You can have mild baldness or it can be very severe.” This means
that the standard method of hair transplant is of little use to a man who
has lost most of his head hair and therefore has no source for the
transplant.

“You’re fighting a losing battle because there’s just not enough to
work with. Most ethical practices will therefore tell a very bald person
that they cannot do it because it will not look natural,” Umar said.

“In addition to that, over the years there are a lot of patients that
have had hair transplantation that is antiquated,” he added. “They have a
‘pluggy’ look. They have scars. And they no longer have any donor supply
left on the back of the head to deal with that issue, because it’s already
been used up.”

Looking for a solution, about seven years ago Umar began exploring
“advanced body hair transplantation” or the “U-graft method.”

Essentially, the technique involves scouting for hair from all over the
body, keeping in mind that not all patients are equally hirsute.

“With this approach I can combine beard hair, chest hair and leg hair,
depending on the person’s hair distribution,” Umar noted. “Mixing that
with some thicker head hair as well, I can come up with about 20,000 to
30,000 hairs, which means I’m then able to tackle some very severely bald
individuals.”

However, recreating a natural hairline at the forehead requires
especially fine hair. Umar believes that leg hair “works the best in terms
of simulating nature [in this spot]. Sometimes we can also take hair from
the nape of the neck, which is also very fine. And then for behind the
hairlines we can use some of the thicker head hair.”

In his case report, Umar published the results of two such transplant
efforts. One involved the exclusive use of leg hair follicles to recreate
the front of the patient’s original hairline/temple area, while the other
involved mixing transplanted leg and head hair to soften and bring forward
a custom-designed “widow’s peak” hairline for a patient.

In both cases, the transplant procedure gave rise to what Umar
described as a “fully grown and soft-looking hairline” within nine months.
Between 75 to 80 percent of the fine transplanted leg hair flourished in
its new home on the head, and three to four years later both patients had
experienced minimal hair loss in the transplant area.

However, Umar noted that men seeking such procedures should be both
patient and prepared for a hefty bill. The procedures are typically
spaced over two sessions (each involving three to five days) that are
spread over the course of a year. And at $7 to $10 per hair follicle graft
(with each follicle containing anywhere from one to four strands of hair),
the bill will ultimately total in the thousands, Umar said, with so-called
“slick bald” patients facing the highest expense.

Opinions from other experts in hair transplantation were mixed.

Dr. Malcolm Roth is president of the American Society of Plastic
Surgeons and chief of the division of plastic surgery at Albany Medical
Center in Albany, N.Y. He hailed the innovation as “yet another example of
how new techniques continue to refine and improve outcomes in cosmetic
procedures to give patients more natural results.”

However, Dr. Barry DiBernardo, who has a private practice in Montclair,
N.J., said the procedure does raise a few questions and concerns.

“Finding hair from other parts of the body is not new at all,” he
noted. “We’ve long considered that option, because clearly when you’re
designing a hairline . . . the more we can make it look like what was
there in the first place, the better,” DiBernardo explained.

“But when you use body hair it can be a different thickness,”
DiBernardo said. “It can have more curl to it than the original hair. So
these reports sound fine. But the approach does raise the issue of a hair
mismatch, which of course will depend on the person. Everybody varies,” he
said.

“The other thing is the question of the potential for scarring, or
leaving pinpoint scars, following harvesting of hair,” DiBernardo pointed
out. “Because while you’re not going to see the back of the head and it’s
a very good area for healing to begin with, you will see the leg.
And the leg certainly doesn’t heal as well as the scalp.”

More information

Find out more about hair transplants at the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes