Jew World Order

As the
new world order takes shape, the fundamental economic principles we have
been so accustomed to are changing. The principles behind world
government as dictated by the globalist agenda, is a society that is
free of borders and is controlled by a central government.

Click image to enlarge

Some
have argued that the way in which the new world order will take shape,
prior to the establishment of world government, is via the decentralisation of sovereign governments and the establishment of regional states / localities that are self-governed, borderless and free from regulation.

As you
may be aware, I absolutely love to read historical newspaper articles
about the new world order and the globalist agenda.

On my daily expedition through the newspaper archives, I came across a beauty from 1994. The article is titled “New world order: the rise of the region-state” and was written by Kenchi Ohame. 

Kenchi
Ohame proposes that the only way for the world to prosper is via the
decentralisation of sovereign governments, and the promotion of regional
and smaller self-managed states.

The article provides an interesting insight into how the Globalists are trying to establish world government.
The article was originally written in 1994, 18 years ago, and provides
an account of how governments should be stripped of their sovereignty in
the name of economic prosperity and peace.

Every effort has been made to accurately transcribe the article. If you would like a copy of the original article, please contact me by clicking here.

New World Order: The rise of the region-state

The
noise you hear rumbling in the distance is the sound of the late 20th
century’s primary engine of economic prosperity – the region state –
stirring to life.

No longer will managers organise international activities of their companies on the basis of national borders.
Now the choice will be not whether to go in to, say, China, but which
region of China to enter.

Already, Japanese companies rarely try to
enter the U.S. market as a whole, as if it were a single unified area.
They pick and choose their spots: Northern California, perhaps; and
maybe new England and the great Lakes; and, in recent years, the
mountain states.

Region-states
have vast become the primary units of economic activity. It is through
region states that participation in the global economy actually takes
place, largely because they are the only human scale political entities
whose economic policies put the global logic of individual well-being
ahead of cheap nationalism and the interests of national political
elites.

These region states may in fact be stretched across national borders:
Hong Kong and southern China, for instance, or San Diego and Tijuana,
or the “growth Triangle” of Singapore, neighbouring sections of Malaysia
and the nearby Indonesian islands.

The primary linkages of these natural economic zones are not to their host countries at to the global economy.
As a rule they are small enough (somewhere between five and 20 million
people) to share a limited set of economic and consumer interests, and
large enough to justify the infrastructure (Communications, professional
services, an international airport) necessary to participate
effectively in the global economy.

The
well-informed citizens of a global marketplace will not wait passively
until national governments deliver tangible improvements in lifestyle.
They no longer trust them to do so. Instead, they want to build their
own future.

They can do that most effectively on the regional level –
provided, of course, that is, unlike most nation states, the region is a
genuinely willing to honour the underlying logic of the global
marketplace.

They must, for example, be willing to resist the
inevitable pressures to put the defence of national competitiveness or
job security ahead of providing a hospitable environment for global
resources to come in and operate locally.

The pull
of the global economy, coupled with a growing ability to use that
connection to prosper, is universal – and universally attractive. Physical distance has become economically less important.

This is a world in which manufacturers often discounted prices for
hardware by 20% or more and where the average logistics cost of moving a
product around the globe is less than 10% of the end-user price.

Economic
borders have meaning, if at all, not as a dividing line between
civilisation or nation states, but as the contours of information flow. Where information reaches, the demand grows; where the demand grows, the global economy has a local home.

Perhaps
the best example of this is Dallian, a prosperous city of 1.2 million
people in Liaoning Province in northern China. Dalian’s prosperity has
been driven not by clever management from Beijing but by an infusion of
foreign capital and the presence of foreign corporations.

Of the 3 1/2
thousand corporations operating there, as many as 2 1/2 thousand are
affiliates of foreign companies from all over the world, including more
than 250 high-tech Japanese corporations.

When the city is half finished
industrial development area is completed, it will by itself create a
mini city of some 2 million people, bringing the total population of the
metropolitan area to roughly 3 times the size of Singapore.

In Dallian
you can virtually smell the global economy at work. This is what happens
when government red tape is forgotten and the forces of progress are
unleashed.

In a
world of region states, business managers strategic maps look like the
hide of a zebra; shaded areas of activity, such as Dallian, set off by
unshaded bands of open space.

In economic terms it is regional
borders, which determine the shape of the zebras patches, not the
dividing lines between cultural or political entities that increasingly
matter.

Government
tend not to like this. For them, significantly unequal rates of
patterns of growth are an endless source of problems; by what rule or measure do we define the minimum level of public services that we must provide all citizens in common?

Through what mechanisms of governance can we aspire to manage such vast
the different classes of economic activity? How can we best protect
such different activities from the distorting effects of cross-border
flows of capital and information?

These
are the wrong questions. They are all about control, about holding the
borderless economy at bay, not about letting successful regions flourish
and so provide energy, stimulus and support to bring the rest along.

Capital
markets and corporate decision-makers know perfectly well when the wrong
questions are being asked.

They also know when foreign participation is
not particularly welcome, or when the urge to protect local industries
and competitors is hard to resist, or when the investment of cautious
pension insurance funds is high risk because the government openness to
such capital flows is unpredictable.

Both capital and corporate presence
flow to those areas where global economic logic is – and can be seen to
be – consistently and reliably at work. And where they flow, economies
flourish.

July 7, 2012 – posted at TheGlobalistReport

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook