Texas Violates 14th Amendment: Deny US Born Mexican Children Birth Certificates


Susanne.Posel-Headline.News.Official- texas.birth.certificate.14th.amendment.ted.cruz.ben.carson.birthright.citizenship_occupycorporatismSusanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | Co-Founder, Legacy Bio-Naturals
October 17, 2015

US District Court Judge Robert Pitman ruled that the sta

te of Texas can continue their practice of denying the issuance of birth certificates to children born in the US because their parents are illegal immigrants.

Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right afforded to all born on US soil because of the 14th amendment. This addition to our US Constitution was disapproved by states that had seceded from the Union during the Civil War because it essentially freed Africans from slavery, gave them the opportunity to obtain employment, own or lease land, serve on juries, and vote.

This fact was further solidified by the 1898, wherein the concept of jus soli (i.e. birthright citizenship) was applied to the 14th amendment by the US Supreme Court.

According to documents: “The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment affirmed the traditional jus soli rule, including the exceptions of children born to foreign diplomats, to hostile occupying forces or on foreign public ships, and added a new exception of children of Indians owing direct allegiance to their tribes. It further held that the ‘Fourteenth Amendment … has conferred no authority upon Congress to restrict the effect of birth, declared by the Constitution to constitute a sufficient and complete right to citizenship’ and that it is ‘throughout affirmative and declaratory, intended to allay doubts and settle controversies which had arisen, and not to impose any new restrictions upon citizenship.”

This amendment does include the exclusion of jus soli to children born in the US whose parents are diplomats, born on foreign ships, and those of hostile occupying forces.

None of which currently apply to Mexico.

So essentially, the state of Texas is violating our Constitutional laws when the Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit began refusing birth certificates to children immigrants.

The original lawsuit explained how Texas was able to circumvent the constitution – by refusing matrícula or an ID card issued by a local Mexican consulate of the parents.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was integral in the final ruling after he requested the court dismiss the plaintiff’s case on jurisdiction.

Paxton said the case is about state, not federal, laws; and Texas has immunity.

They did this because Texas state laws prohibit the acceptance of a foreign passport as identification unless it “bears a current US visa”.

Local media explained that the state government “accepts several forms of ID to verify identity but not the matrículas consulares because the documents used to obtain them are not verified by the ‘issuing agency’.”

Another way Texas has been cleverly getting away with violating that 14th amendment is by refusing birth certificates to the children of children born to illegal immigrants.

Regarding this scheme, the complaint reads in part: “As a result of Defendant’s wrongful denial of the birth certificate, Plaintiff Perales faces serious problems in enrolling her daughter in day care, traveling with her child, obtaining necessary medical care and other health, education and welfare services requiring parental consent and/or proof of K.Z.P.S.’s Texas birth.”

Wendy Kramer, director of the Donor Sibling Registry (DSR) wrote an op – ed piece on biology and birth certificates, wherein she explains that because birth certificats have “become an important (if not our sole) means of identification” and because of this, “legal parentage” and “biological background” have devolved into a point of contention and clarification by conservative Republicans.

Birth certificates can illegitimate a person’s right to be a part of the US if it is determined that their procurement was done through breaking current state or federal laws; however in the this case, Texas has taken it upon itself to reclassify a document in order to take advantage of a loophole that does just that.





Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OccupyCorporatism/~3/LVg5R8pezf4/

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes