The First Amendment Is Now a Felonious Criminal Act

May 2nd, 2012

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Mac Slavo
SHTF Plan
May 1, 2012

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment I
Bill of Rights
United States Constitution
Adopted August 21, 1789

As Congressional representatives overwhelming approved the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act in February of this year, few Americans were paying attention. When President Obama signed the Act into law, he did so in secret, without any of the fanfare that came with his signing of universal health care two years prior – and for good reason. This is one of those laws the government doesn’t want you to know exists until it’s too late to do anything about it.

For many, awareness of the existence of the new law will only become apparent when they are arrested and charged under new Federal trespassing guidelines as they attempt to protest, display signs or disrupt any person or event of national significance. An event of national significance is any activity where Secret Service agents are responsible for security. With several thousand agents in the field at any given time, events involving the President, Congressional members, staff or individuals running for Federal office are all fair game.

Simply standing with a bullhorn, holding up a sign, promoting a contentious message or even being on the grounds of a Secret Service secured event will now make it possible for the government to detain, arrest and charge those involved in these “disruptions” (even if you just happen to be passing through) with a felonious criminal act.

Excerpt from HR 347:

Whoever attempts or conspires to knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;

OR

knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds

…

The punishment for a violation is—

(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more
than 10 years, or both, if—

(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense,
uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm;

(*editor’s note: did you want to show your support for the 2nd Amendment by carrying your rifle or gun to a protest or march like so many have done in the past? Do it as of now and you’re facing ten years in prison)

or

‘(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as
defined by section 2118(e)(3); and

(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more
than one year, or both, in any other case.

The law is very clear in who has authority over these events, but as is generally the case, very broad in what can or cannot be deemed a disruption.

Judge Andrew Napolitano weighs in on Fox News:

“This is not like a traffic ticket – for standing and protesting.

The type of thing that for 230 years Americans took for granted because it was protected by the First Amendment. Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech has actually been abridged.

…

[The law] basically allows Secret Service agents to decide where there are ‘NO Free Speech Zones’, not ‘Free Speech Zones’… ‘NO Free Speech Zones.’

Anybody protected by the Secret Service can ask those agents to ban protests wherever they are. I can think of three violations – speech violations, association violations, and the right to petition the government for redress of your grievances.

What good is free speech if the people in the government are so far away from you that they can’t hear you.

…

It is a part of American history since day one that we have the right to speak freely to, about and against those in the government.

With Red Zones and large-scale detention facilities in the process of being implemented in Chicago ahead of the May 20-21 NATO summit, there’s a strong likelihood that any protests disseminating a message in opposition to those attending this event of national significance will be met with strong-arm tactics of the new American police state.

The government is preparing to send a message to the proles, and their intention is to strike fear into the hearts and minds of every one of us.

Print this page.

Comment Rules

63 Responses to “The First Amendment Is Now a Felonious Criminal Act”

Yeah, vote obamanator , the regulator of any and all human bodily functions, especially speach….

flaming_red_pill Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:24 pm

mayor mike mcginn in seattle wa is actually spearheading the raping of the bill of rights,

the eugene hippies came back today while i was in psychotherapy (around 12:30pm LOL),
and they did a lot of damage to a couple streets worth of storefronts. etc. i guess it had to do with the silly May Day occupy bullshit. :

the police responded with sanctioned brutality and apparently the reason is not vandalism but suspicion of citizens being armed… sigh
THIS IS WHY THE FOUNDERS WROTE THIS AMENDMENT IN STONE ENCASED IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

INALIENABLE RIGHTS.

AND THEN BACKED IT UP BY THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

saber Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:30 pm

unalienable super… its unalienable

hammerhead Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:50 pm

LMAO ! i did not see that one ! i have always posted the same way , “inalienable” lol

every day should ALWAYS bring a new awakening , even in the evening .haha

Chrisballs Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 6:05 pm

Super is correct. It is “inalienable”. “unalienable” is different. When politicians say “unalienable”, they know they are misleading you. It is word art. When they use the later, they presume you have no rights, they are thinking you are an idiot, a useless breeder.

Just like; The punishment for a violation is—

(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more
than 10 years, or both, if—

(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense,
uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm;

The key word is “person”. It does not mean you but, they are pretending it does. Look up the word in Black’s or on Cornell or, in any of your State definitions from code.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:28 pm

GOOD FOR YOU, YOU KNOW THERE ARE 2 SETS OF BOOKS WHEN IT COMES TO WORDS.

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:38 pm

Like the word “may.”

LibertyHound Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:26 pm

The founding fathers used both words, inalienable and unalienable, interchangeably. There are many instances where you would be correct about this issue of deceptive word use but this instance is not one of them.

Pman Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:34 pm

Man all of you are messed up it is and I quote

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

UNALIENABLE refers to your rights as “unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor” meaning you cannot give them away nor can they be taken away.

INALIENABLE refers to Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights. Which means with your consent you can give them away!

DO NOT BE FOOLED the founders put UNALIENABLE in there for a DAMNED GOOD REASON!

In today’s modern time both words are used interchangeably which is ridiculous as they are clearly two different words with 2 different meanings.

I hope this has cleared up this little over looked fact.

Peace Frog Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:34 pm

right you are SDM…if you even dare to criticize anything he says…out comes the race card
You guys are F*%d the lone Kenyan has done more than the two Bushes and Clinton combined and been let get away with it because of the colour of his skin ! Dumb mother fuckers. with less than 20% of the population voting for him.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:18 pm

THE COMMUNISTS PICKED HIM SO THEY CAN POINT AND SAY “RACIST” WHEN WE OPPOSE THEIR MARXIST AGENDA.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:45 pm

If memory serves me Bush set up free speech zones and not even a wimper. They just nibble away bit by bit.

Fuck e’m all.

luvmuscle54 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 6:01 pm

100% agree! People bitch but that’s it.
Stupid, and yet they’ll win with this. The bad guys are WORKING HARD EVERY DAY to kill us, while we are DOING NOTHING EVER ON ANY DAY. Since action wins over inaction, I’d say it’s a foregone conclusion that you HAVE TO USE THAT GUN OR DIE.

hammerhead Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:53 pm

NO – not yet tom … slow down
And, the Congress was in overwhelming approval of – a bill they probably didn’t read or knew what the hell was in it or they knew and it’s just status quo with the ONE party system we have – I mean the Communist Regime we have in WA. It doesn’t surprise us at all knowing that every move this fake pres makes is one of deception and one that stomps the hell out of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The whole thing is a sham with all of them voting the same way. None of them are for the people – none except one guy who the public is flocking to because he has brains in his head – not mush.

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:45 pm

The knew!
I SAID IT BEFORE AND I’LL SAY IT AGAIN.

WE DIDNT WIN THE COLD WAR, MARXISTS EMBEDDED IN THE STATE DEPT SURRENDERED THE USA INTO WORLD SOVIET SOCIALISM.

THE TRANSFORMATION UNDER THE GUIZE OF PROTECTING US FROM TERRORISTS IS WHAT YOU SEE TAKEING PLACE AROUND US.

HELL, THEN EVEN PROCLAIM THE WAR ON TERROR OVER AND YET THE POLICE STATE BUILD UP CONTINUES.

hammerhead Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 4:58 pm

WE DIDNT WIN THE COLD WAR, MARXISTS EMBEDDED IN THE STATE DEPT SURRENDERED THE USA INTO WORLD SOVIET SOCIALISM.

we did not win the cold war , but we surrendered to the NWO and agenda 21 , it was a trade off .

Chrisballs Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:28 pm

What’s with this “we” shit? I didn’t trade my rights for ANYTHING.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:29 pm

THE NWO AND AGENDA 21

IS WORLD MARXISM DUMMY.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:30 pm

WHEN THE HEAD OF THE SURITY COUNCIL OF THE UN IS AND WILL ALWAYS BE A COMMUNIST

THATS WORLD MARXISM.

Super Duper Man 1776 Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:31 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL
What a stupid waste of our tax payer dollars. For enforcement and adjudication of a non-sense law that clearly flies in the face of the First Amendment. So what, a petuli stinking second year Poli Sci student gets 10 years in the klink for peacefully protesting the corporate/government collusion? WTF.

Chrisballs Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 6:07 pm

Stop being a “taxpayer”. It gives them evidence that you agree to their terms.

Peace Frog Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:36 pm

America is a corporation…and we are the collateral…slaves to the state

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:39 pm

Yesser!

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:39 pm

11 years and counting
And still they do nothing but complain, anonymously, on message boards….

Chrisballs Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:32 pm

We are far from “anonymous”, every thing here is well observed and all our IPs are known, for certain. Not all of us here just complain. Much truth is given for those who choose to see it. Sometimes, ironically, in parables.
well, anyway, we can still come on this web forum – even after, in my case, behaving indecently with my life-size bedtime Janet Napolitano doll. I buried it the other day, but dug it up again with reports of this travesty against our rights.

Peace Frog Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:38 pm

Did you ever have a Janet Reno doll rebbi ?
I wonder if they’ll arrest AJ at the upcoming Bilderberg meeting.
as Gomer Pyle used to say

sirpraahhhs sirpraahhhs!!!

Captain Ron Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 6:00 pm

Didn’t you get the memo???

AJ plays for both sides…

MORE GRUEL FOR EVERYONE!!!

Peace Frog Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:40 pm

you know…how does he get away with saying all this stuff…and I get listed ?

what the hell is up with that ?…why isn’t he listed ?…harassed ?… surveiled ?

Dandroid Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:48 pm

For now they ridicule him………..
yeah, but those stripper clips are not as fast loading as the other clips and it’s easy to jam the bullets….
Funny… Nothing looks any different.
another drawback to the SKS is that our lovely US gov has made it a federal firearms offense to alter it. you can’t do shit to this gun without being a felon. even SKS gurus can’t tell you exactly what is illegal. why was the ATF instructed to prohibit the modification of the SKS? well, when they were first imported to the USA they sold for under $100.00 making it really really cheap firepower. then aftermarket businesses began making a slew of cool mods for this cheap rifle to make it even better. can’t have that….
I couldnt find where to post this but, to defend Batista shows no knowledge of the Cuban Revolution. Batista was an organized crime head. Castro openly requested US assistance in removing him. He never received it, so he solicited the Soviets as a last resort. Who happily obliged …Because the US government was totally owned by the mob. And still are.

Peas and Rice guys, who the hell do you stand for? You talk about revolution as long as it’s not “socialist”. What the hell does that mean? You either stand for democratic rule or not.
opps, the ‘gun’ posts above were to a video that loaded in this same page. strange….
Not only that but you are probably supporting the people who offed Kennedy.

Damn Alex, how can you say what you said?
She was kin until she was gone… I was young and foolish didn’t know what I was doing until she was gone, and she had a pretty face that drove my heart wild… But now i have to get up early every morning to find me another lover, because the early bird always catches the worm…. LOL…..

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:07 pm

NOW I GOTTA GET UP EARLY EVERY MORNING TO FIND ME ANOTHER LOVER….

Ho of Babylon Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:19 pm

well, you could ask Rabbi Sam where he got his Janet Napolitano doll. If you bury yours underground too, she might even have worms.
It is the the filthy and longterm ecampments of protesters they want to thwart.

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:10 pm

Is your lover a beautiful babe of your hearts desire?

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:24 pm

See what I mean? NOW I GOTTA GET UP EARLY EVERY MORNING TO FIND ME ANOTHER LOVER….
hahahaha….
I would have thought I would have found a few geniuses on this site but it’s it’s just me all alone…. so I tip my hat in heart and tell myself I hope I can return to love….

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:44 pm

LOL….

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:46 pm

Oh that’s really funny Van now you have descended into laughing at your own jokes….

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 7:47 pm

Get a life Van Your even commenting on your own comments… lol….
Peace Frog – that’s one of those lose-lose questions which I’d better not answer. I just remember what a sweet older Jewish woman once said in a religious setting years ago – “where G-d closes a door, he opens a window”. If conventional protest closes down, I’ll use the window of metaphor, hyperbole, satire, and truth.
I went to war with the God foe loss of love but my heart was confused for I found he did not cherish love so I was exposed in battle and was hurt but not destroyed. Who is this God that judges Men he created? Is the God of Men’s hearts the true God? What is the purpose of the evil against Men from the God if he is true than why does the Evil exist? I have learned in battle against the God and that he cares foe willfulness of Man and also moves against the judgement of men in their minds. To the God it seems to be about men’s minds. It sickened me that the God I thought I loved was a heartless machine like minds. Does he not see the truth of mens suffering under his Devils? So It sickened me to learn of the God of this Universe system….

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 8:51 pm

So even now my heart of hatred of his petty heart rises against him because he killed my father for nothing but his pride. Also I rise against the God for killing me and everything I cherished…. Though he has not killed me yet he surely will….
for the day has come that they will call good evil and evil good a the has come now what are you going to do set on your fat asses and dont do a fucking thing the consitution has the answer and it was said by ben franklyn and thomas jefferson that is this we have to have a revolution every ten years and water the tree of liberty with theirs and our blood to stay free for those who forget the past always repeat the past events with far more eviler events

so i call you all lilly liver panzyies who dont do shit but talk and talk but dont do a goddamn thing so where is your line in the sand huh fuckng bastards

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:07 pm

Oh yes I have drawn my enemy out into battle, he dares to think I will I will not fight to the death for love…
Er, Does this mean that the Secret Service whores will now been demanding payment up front??

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:38 pm

lol!…. don’t they know federal reserve notes are on the verge of being worthless after this world learns the truth of their evi?l….

VanHelsing Reply:
May 1st, 2012 at 9:39 pm

This is how you spell EVIL… get a clue dude, lol….